About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Green Ninja Middle School Integrated Science | Science
Product Notes
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 do not meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning does not meet expectations. The materials do not engage students through the integration of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs or engage students in sensemaking. While each lesson includes learning objectives, very few of the lessons have three-dimensional learning objectives; often the CCC is missing from the learning objectives. Every unit includes summative assessments as well as a culminating project. Each unit includes Performance Expectations (PEs) as the three-dimensional learning objective but often the summative assessments only assess a portion of that PE.
Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning does not meet expectations. There are few opportunities for students to engage in phenomena and/or problems throughout the series. The majority of the phenomena are seen in Grade 6 and are within the physical science and earth and space science domains. While students engage in problems throughout each grade level, there are few opportunities to engage in problems; when problems are present they are seen in the physical science and earth and space science domains. When phenomena and problems are present, they meet expectations of being connected to grade level DCIs and are presented as directly as possible to students. However, science topics typically organize student learning, as opposed to phenomena or problems driving student learning. Additionally, the materials do not leverage students’ prior knowledge or experiences related to the phenomena or problems.
Science 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 do not meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning does not meet expectations. The materials do not engage students through the integration of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs or engage students in sensemaking. While each lesson includes learning objectives, very few of the lessons have three-dimensional learning objectives; often the CCC is missing from the learning objectives. Every unit includes summative assessments as well as a culminating project. Each unit includes Performance Expectations (PEs) as the three-dimensional learning objective but often the summative assessments only assess a portion of that PE.
Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning does not meet expectations. There are few opportunities for students to engage in phenomena and/or problems throughout the series. The majority of the phenomena are seen in Grade 6 and are within the physical science and earth and space science domains. While students engage in problems throughout each grade level, there are few opportunities to engage in problems; when problems are present they are seen in the physical science and earth and space science domains. When phenomena and problems are present, they meet expectations of being connected to grade level DCIs and are presented as directly as possible to students. However, science topics typically organize student learning, as opposed to phenomena or problems driving student learning. Additionally, the materials do not leverage students’ prior knowledge or experiences related to the phenomena or problems.
6th to 8th
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.