2021

Fishtank Plus ELA K-2

Publisher
Fishtank Learning
Subject
ELA
Grades
K-2
Report Release
04/27/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: No Foundational Skills

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC

This score represents an average across grade levels reviewed for: integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, and promotion of mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Building Knowledge
68/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report Overview

Summary of Alignment & Usability: Fishtank Plus ELA K-2 | ELA

ELA K-2

The instructional materials for Fishtank Plus Grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment and building knowledge but do not meet the expectations for usability. The materials include texts that are well-crafted. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. Because a similar topic or theme connects all units, students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge-building. There is not sufficient support or guidance in the program provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. While some guidance is provided, the suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of additional materials and scaffolds to the teacher.

Kindergarten
View Full Report
Gateway 1

Text Quality

32/34
0
16
28
34

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

19/25
0
14
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Gateway 1

Text Quality

33/34
0
16
28
34

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

19/25
0
14
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Gateway 1

Text Quality

33/34
0
16
28
34

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

19/25
0
14
22
25

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations