Note on review tool version
See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used for this report:
- Our current review tools are version 2.0. Learn more >
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (version 1.0 or 1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align to current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools >
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Big Ideas Math: Modeling Real Life | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Big Ideas Math: Modeling Real Life Grades K-2 partially meet expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The instructional materials meet expectations for Gateway 1, focus and coherence. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and balance and practice-content connections. The instructional materials were not reviewed for Gateway 3, instructional supports and usability indicators.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed for Big Ideas Math: Modeling Real Life Grades 3-5 partially meet expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The instructional materials meet expectations in Grades 3 and 5 and partially meet expectations in Grade 4 for Gateway 1, focus and coherence. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and balance and practice-content connections. The instructional materials were not reviewed for Gateway 3, instructional supports and usability indicators.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Big Ideas Math: Modeling Real Life, Grades 6-8 partially meet expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The instructional materials meet expectations for Gateway 1, focus and coherence. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for Gateway 2, rigor and balance and practice-content connections. The instructional materials were not reviewed for Gateway 3, instructional supports and usability indicators.