SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE: EdReports.org will be undergoing system maintenance from February 21-23, 2025. During this time, our website, email, and other related services may be temporarily unavailable. To contact us or stay informed, please follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, Bluesky, Threads, and YouTube. We apologize for any inconvenience.

2019

Spider Learning ELA

Publisher
Spider Learning, Inc.
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-8
Report Release
06/18/2020
Review Tool Version
v1.0
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
Not Eligible
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

Note on review tool version

See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used for this report:

Report Overview

Summary of Alignment & Usability: Spider Learning ELA | ELA

ELA 6-8

The instructional materials for Spider Learning ELA Grades 6-8 do not meet expectations of Gateway 1. The materials do include high quality, engaging texts for students in 6th, 7th, and 8th grades, but they do not include every required text type called for in the standards. Students are provided some opportunities to engage in text-based writing and discussion, but this is not comprehensive nor consistent.

Since the materials do not meet expectations for Gateway 1, they were not reviewed for Gateway 2 or Gateway 3.

Gateway 1

Text Quality

13/36
0
17
32
36
Gateway 2

Building Knowledge

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Gateway 1

Text Quality

13/36
0
17
32
36
Gateway 2

Building Knowledge

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Gateway 1

Text Quality

13/36
0
17
32
36
Gateway 2

Building Knowledge

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE
0
15
28
32

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Does Not Meet Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated