About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: JUMP Math | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten and Grade 1 meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1. The materials in both grades meet the expectation for focus as they assess grade-level topics and spend the majority of class time on major work of the grade. The materials for Kindergarten and Grade 1 are also coherent and consistent with the Standards. The materials for Kindergarten and Grade 1 do not meet expectations for rigor and the mathematical practices (MPs) in Gateway 2. The materials partially meet the expectations for rigor as they develop conceptual understand and procedural fluency, and even though the materials identify and use the MPs to enrich the mathematical content, the materials do not meet the expectations for the MPs.
Grade 2 materials are currently under revision by the publisher. EdReports will re-review and publish the grade-level report upon the completion of the materials revision.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 and Grade 5 meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1. The materials in both grades meet the expectation for focus as they assess grade-level topics and spend the majority of class time on major work of the grade. The materials for Grade 4 and Grade 5 are also coherent and consistent with the Standards. The materials for Grade 4 and Grade 5 do not meet expectations for rigor and the mathematical practices (MPs) in Gateway 2. The materials partially meet the expectations for rigor as they develop conceptual understand and procedural fluency, and even though the materials identify and use the MPs to enrich the mathematical content, the materials do not meet the expectations for the MPs.
Grade 3 materials are currently under revision by the publisher. EdReports will re-review and publish the grade-level report upon the completion of the materials revision.
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 6-8
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1. The materials for all three grades meet the expectations for focus as they assess grade-level topics and spend the majority of class time on major work of the grade, and the instructional materials for all three grades meet the expectations for being coherent and consistent with the Standards. The materials for all three grades do not meet the expectations for rigor and the mathematical practices (MPs) in Gateway 2. The materials partially meet the expectations for rigor as they develop conceptual understanding and procedural skill and fluency, and even though the materials identify and use the MPs to enrich the mathematical content, the materials do not meet the expectations for the MPs.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for Kindergarten
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The materials meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1, and they do not meet the expectations for rigor and the mathematical practices in Gateway 2. Since the materials partially meet the expectations for alignment, evidence concerning instructional supports and usability indicators in Gateway 3 was not collected.
Kindergarten
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectations for Gateway 1. These materials do not assess above-grade-level content and spend the majority of the time on the major clusters of each grade level. Teachers using these materials as designed will use supporting clusters to enhance the major work of the grade. These materials are consistent with the mathematical progression in the standards, and students are offered extensive work with grade-level problems. Connections are made between clusters and domains where appropriate. Overall, the materials meet the expectations for focusing on the major work of the grade, and the materials also meet the expectations for coherence.
Gateway 1
v1.0
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten JUMP Math meet the expectations for not assessing topics before the grade-level in which the topic should be introduced. Although there are suggestions on what could be used as formative assessments in the teacher pages at the beginning of the book marked K.1, there are no areas in specific lessons marked as summative assessment for teachers to use as guidance.
Indicator 1A
JUMP Math materials for Kindergarten meets the expectations for assessing grade-level content. The program does not provide any designated summative assessments, yet it does give suggestions as to what could be used as assessments.
- Page A-11 in the TE states, “The secret to bringing an entire class along at the same pace is to use continuous assessment.”
- On page A-11 in the TE, the publisher states, “ JUMP Math materials are designed to allow for continuous formative assessment.” In addition they state, “The JUMP Math Kindergarten materials provide four levels of assessment for students. Each lesson contains a variety of questions that can be used for formative assessment during the lesson. The activity at the end of the whole-class lesson can be used for more full assessing every student, even those who might be reticent in groups. The accompanying pages of the AP Book can be used to verify that students understood the lesson….Finally, activity centers allow further exploration and integration of materials. Teachers can take advantage of the smaller groups in the activity centers to assess and reinforce if necessary.” While JUMP Math Kindergarten does not contain a more formal assessment system, it does provide options that assess grade level standards.
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectation for having students and teachers using the materials as designed devoting the large majority of class time to the major work of the grade. Students and teachers using the materials as designed devote approximately 76 percent of class time to the major work of the grade.
Indicator 1B
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectations for spending the majority of class time on the major clusters of each grade. Overall, approximately 76 percent of class time is devoted to major work of the grade.
The materials for Kindergarten include 14 Units. In the materials there are 133 lessons. The supporting clusters were also reviewed to determine if they could be factored in due to how strongly they support major work of the grade. There were some connections found between supporting clusters and major clusters.
Three perspectives were considered: 1) the number of units devoted to major work, 2) the number of lessons devoted to major work, and 3) the number of instructional days devoted to major work including days for unit assessments.
The percentages for each of the three perspectives follow:
- Units– Approximately 71 percent, 10 out of 14;
- Lessons– Approximately 76 percent, 101 out of 133; and
- Days– Approximately 76 percent, 101 out of 133.
The number of instructional days, approximately 76 percent, devoted to major work is the most reflective for this indicator because it represents the total amount of class time that addresses major work.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectations for coherence. The materials use supporting content as a way to continue working with the major work of the grade and include a full program of study that is viable content for a school year including 143 days of lessons and assessment. Students are given extensive work on grade-level problems, and materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. These instructional materials are visibly shaped by the cluster headings in the standards, and connections are made between domains and clusters within the grade level. Overall, the Kindergarten materials support coherence and are consistent with the progressions in the standards.
Indicator 1C
The instructional materials for JUMP Math Kindergarten meet the expectation that supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade. When appropriate, the supporting work enhances and supports the major work of the grade level.
Examples where connections are present include the following:
- K.G.B supports the major work of K.CC.B.
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 3 Lessons 6 and 7, students are learning about squares and rectangles while also using their counting skills.
- K.MD.B supports the major cluster of K.CC.B.
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 6 Lessons 2 and 3, students are sorting cubes and cards while also counting objects.
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 6 Lesson 4, students are asked to count each group and how many are in each group after sorting in different ways.
Indicator 1D
The instructional materials reviewed meet the expectations for having an amount of content designated for one grade level that is viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. Overall, the amount of time needed to complete the lessons is approximately 143 days which is appropriate for a school year of approximately 140-190 days.
- The materials are written with 14 units containing a total of 133 lessons.
- Each lesson is designed to be implemented during the course of one 45 minute class period per day.
- There is a unit at the beginning of the Kindergarten book called Getting Ready for Kindergarten Math: Songs, Stories, and Games. This unit includes 10 additional songs, games, and stories without attached lesson plans.
Indicator 1E
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectation for being consistent with the progressions in the Standards. Overall, the materials completely address the standards for this grade-level and provide all students with extensive work on grade-level problems. The materials make connections to content in future grades.
The materials develop according to the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. Content from future grades is not always clearly identified but often related to grade-level work. The Teacher Resources contain sections that highlight the development of the grade-by-grade progressions in the materials, occasionally identify content from future grades, and state the relationship to grade-level work.
- At the beginning of each unit, "This Unit in Context" provides a description of connections to concepts that have been taught earlier in the year and that will occur in future grade levels. For example, "This Unit in Context" from Unit 8, Operations and Algebraic Thinking: Addition within 10, of Teacher Resources Part 2 describes how "students build on Unit 7 by adding numbers with a total less than or equal to 10." Connection to future content is stated, but standards are not made specific. "The final two lessons begin to develop facility with pairs that make 10, an important tool for addition and subtraction in higher grades."
The materials give all students extensive work with grade-level problems. The lessons also include "Extensions," and the problems in these sections are on grade-level.
- Whole class instruction is used in the lessons, and all students are expected to do the same work throughout the lesson. Individual, small-group, or whole-class instruction occurs in the lessons.
- The problems in the Assessment & Practice books align to the content of the lessons, and they provide grade-level problems that "were designed to help students develop confidence, fluency, and practice." (page A-38, Teacher Resources)
- In the Extensions sections of the Lessons, students get the opportunity to engage with more difficult problems, but the problems are still aligned to grade-level standards. For example, the problems in Lesson 4 of Unit 6 in Teacher Resources Part 1 engage students in sorting shapes which is still aligned to K.MD.3 and K.CC.5,6,7.
Indicator 1F
Kindergarten JUMP Math materials meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade level, where appropriate and required by the Standards. Overall, the materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings, and the materials sometimes connect two or more clusters in a domain or two or more domains in a grade when appropriate.
In the materials, the units are organized by domains and are clearly labeled. For example, Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 1 Counting and Cardinality: Numbers 1 to 5 and Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 7 Operations and Algebraic Thinking: Addition within 5 are shaped by the Counting and Cardinality and Operations and Algebraic Thinking Domains. Within the units, there are goals for each lesson, and the language of the goals is visibly shaped by the CCSSM cluster headings. For example, in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 10 Lesson 5 , the goals for the lessons include language concerning work with numbers 11-19 to gain foundations for place value, "Students name recognize and begin to write the numbers 14, 15, 16," , and these lessons are aligned to K.NBT.A. Also, in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 8 Lesson 22, the goals for the lessons include language concerning operations and algebraic thinking, “Given expressions that show addition students add within 10 using objects or pictures," and these lessons are aligned to K.OA.A.
Materials sometimes include problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain or two or more domains in the grade.
- Some lessons connect clusters within a domain. For example, Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 1 Lesson 5 addresses clusters K.CC.A and K.CC.B by having students use number names and count the number of objects.
- Some lessons connect standards from 2 domains. For example, Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 3 Lesson 2 addresses standards K.G.1,2 and K.CC.5 by having students identify and count shapes.
- Student work in Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 6 Lesson 3 by sorting shapes by attribute (K.MD.3) and by counting the sizes of the groups and then ordering the groups by size (K.CC.C).
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 6 Lesson 5, students sort shapes by counting the number of corners (K.CC.B, K.MD.B) and classify shapes into categories (K.G.4).
Overview of Gateway 2
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not meet the expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials partially meet the expectations for rigor and do not meet the expectations for mathematical practices.
Gateway 2
v1.0
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
The instructional materials reviewed forKindergarten partially meet expectations for rigor and balance. The materials include specific attention to both conceptual understanding and procedural skill and fluency; however, there are limited opportunities for students to work with engaging applications. As a result, the materials do not exhibit a balance of the three aspects of rigor.
Indicator 2A
The instructional materials for Kindergarten meet expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.
Cluster K.NBT.A focuses on working with numbers 11-19 to gain foundations for place value.
- Students work with K.NBT.A in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 10. Lesson 2 has students counting 11, 12, and 13 with and without ten frames, and Lesson 3 uses ten frames and number bonds to develop an understanding that teen numbers consist of ten ones and some more ones. Lessons 4-12 continue this development through all teen numbers.
K.OA.A focuses on understanding putting together and adding to, and understanding subtraction as taking apart and taking from.
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 7, students begin their understanding of addition within 5 by counting on (Lesson 2), acting out (Lesson 3), adding with objects and pictures (Lessons 4 and 5), Putting together with objects and pictures (Lessons 6-8), decomposing (Lessons 9 and 10), adding 1 and 0 (Lesson 12).
- Students continue their understanding in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 8 by continuing to use adding on strategies, acting out, objects, pictures, and decomposing.
- Teacher Resources Part 2 Units 11 and 12 extend student understanding from addition to subtraction. Again, students use counting strategies, objects and pictures, composing, and subtraction.
Indicator 2B
The materials for Jump Math Kindergarten meet the expectations for procedural skill and fluency by giving attention throughout the year to individual standards which set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.
- The teacher's edition gives strategies for mental math in the teacher's edition page A-29. The strategies are not incorporated into the lesson plans for the teacher.
- There are games in the teacher's edition pages A34-A35 that help to build student fluency. These games focus on learning pairs to 5 and 10, but these games are not mentioned in the lessons.
Standard K.OA.5 requires students to fluently add and subtract within 5.
- Much of the work in Kindergarten is around adding and subtracting. Teacher Resources Part 2 Units 7, 8, 11, and 12 focus on Operations and Algebraic Thinking standards.
- Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 7 Lesson 2 has students counting on to 5. Subsequent lessons in the unit include Acting Out with Addition, Adding with Objects, Adding with Pictures, Putting Together with Objects/Pictures, and Decomposing 5.
Indicator 2C
The materials for Kindergarten Jump Math do not meet the expectation for being designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics without losing focus on the major work of each grade.
There are 25 lessons in the series that identify a focus on K.OA.2. This cluster calls on students to understand putting together, adding to, taking apart, and taking from situations with unknowns in all positions. Work in this series is limited to adding to, taking from, and putting together with the result unknown as well as put together with both addends unknown. This represents 4 of the 12 possible application situations for this cluster as identified in Table 1 of the Common Core Glossary. There were no problems that addressed add to change unknown, add to start unknown, take from change unknown, take from start unknown, put together addend unknown, take apart total unknown, take apart addend unknown, and take apart both addends unknown. In addition, Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 8 Lessons 21 and 22 and Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 11 Lesson 31 list K.OA.2 as one of the standards addressed in the lesson, but the lessons do not contain word problems. Therefore, this series does not provide the depth called for in the cluster.
Word problems included in the instructional materials are often routine.
- Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 7 Lesson 6: "I like apples and pears, so I buy one apple and two pears. How can I find out how much fruit I bought in all?"
- Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 8 Lesson 18: "Friendly Farm has seven cows. Welcome Farm has three cows. How many cows in all?"
- Teacher Resources Part Unit 11 Lesson 28: "I have five apples. Kate eats two apples. How many apples are left?"
- AP book K.2, pg. 191: "3 ants climb a wall, 2 fall down. How many ants are on the wall now?"
- AP book K.2, pg. 185: "3 cats chase a ball, 2 dogs chase a ball. How many pets in total?"
- AP book K.2, pg. 165: "Draw circles to show bunnies. Cross out circles to show bunnies that hop away. How many bunnies stay?"
Lessons focus on a whole class approach; therefore, most word problems are performed as a whole class, not independently.
Indicator 2D
The instructional materials partially meet the expectation that the materials balance all three aspects of rigor with the three aspects almost always treated separately within the curriculum including within and during lessons and practice. Overall, the majority of the lessons focus on procedural skills and fluency with very few opportunities for students to discover and apply procedures for themselves. There is a not a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade.
- The three aspects of rigor are not pursued with equal intensity in this program.
- Conceptual knowledge and procedural skill and fluency are evident in the instructional materials. There are multiple lessons where conceptual development is the clear focus.
- The instructional materials lack opportunities for students to engage in application and deep problem solving in real world situations.
- There are very few lessons that treat all three aspects together due to the relative weakness in application. However, there are several lessons that include conceptual development leading to procedural practice and fluency.
- There are minimal opportunities for students to engage in cognitively demanding tasks and applications that would call for them to use the math they know to solve problems and integrate their understanding into real-world applications.
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
The instructional materials reviewed for Jump Math Kindergarten do not meet the expectations for practice-content connections. Although the materials meet expectations for identifying and using the MPs to enrich mathematics content, they do not attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. Overall, in order to meet the expectations for meaningfully connecting the Standards for Mathematical Content and the MPs, the instructional materials should carefully pay attention to the full meaning of each MP, especially MP3 in regards to students critiquing the reasoning of other students and teachers engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.
Indicator 2E
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.
In Teacher Resources Part 1, a discussion of MPs is given starting on page A-22 . According to a statement in the materials, “We guide students to develop Mathematical Practice Standards by explicitly teaching the skills required.” The MPs are not listed in the beginning with the lesson goals but in parentheses in bold within the lesson at the part where they occur. As stated on page A-22 in Teacher Resources Part 1, "While the development of these practices occur in virtually every lesson, only some lessons have grade-level application to the standards. These grade-level applications are identified in the margin"
Overall, the materials clearly identify the MPs and incorporate them into the lessons. The MPs are incorporated into almost every lesson; they are not taught as separate lessons. All of the MPs are represented and attended to multiple times throughout the year, though not equally. In particular, MP5 receives the least attention.
Indicator 2F
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not meet the expectations for carefully attending to the full meaning of each practice standard. The publisher rarely addresses the Mathematical Practice Standards in a meaningful way.
The materials only identify examples of the Standards for Mathematical Practice, so the teacher does not always know when a MP is being carefully attended to. MPs are marked throughout the curriculum, but sometimes the problems are routine problems that do not cover the depth of the Math Practices. Many times the MPs are marked where teachers are doing the work.
Examples where the material does not meet the expectation for the full meaning of the identified MP:
- MP1: In Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 12 Lesson 35, Activity 1 is marked as MP1. Students create subtraction stories. Students are given magazines and told to cut out pictures to create a subtraction story with an associated number sentence. Students share these with classmates, but they are not looking for entry points to solve a problem. It is a missed opportunity to have students trade stories and create the subtraction number sentence for another student’s story which would allow them to make sense of math problems and persevere in problem solving. Another example is found in Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 2 Lesson 10; in the lesson, students practice writing the digit 4 as a whole class. Students who finish the whole class lesson early can go to the Assessment and Practice Book Part 1 Unit 1 Lesson 10 and trace the number 4. While writing the digit 4 is a Kindergarten standard, there is no mathematical thinking occurring while students are tracing digits. Students do not have to make sense of mathematical situations or persevere while tracing digits.
- MP4: In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 3 Lesson 21, students are using a blackline master to match houses with doors. This is a matching activity, and there is no modeling.
- MP5: In Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 7 Lesson 9, students are directed to use five frames for counting which does not allow the opportunity to choose an appropriate tool for the math. Typically students do not select tools when MP5 is indicated in a lesson.
- MP6: In Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 14 Lesson 6, students fill containers to determine which has a larger capacity. Students work in groups filling containers with sand and rice to determine which holds more and which holds less. While students are talking and working in groups they are not required to use the precise vocabulary of the lesson during their group work (i.e. bigger, less, more, same amount, and smaller).
- MP7: While the publisher attaches MP7 to many lessons, sometimes the structure is found in the standard itself and not the indicated exercise. For example, in Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 2 Lesson 12, in the activity “Associating written numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, with spoken numbers” the teacher makes a small deck of card numbered 1-5. The teacher holds up a number card for each number and says: “We learned that this is the number 5 .” The teacher repeats as needed and then changes the question to “What is this number?” In this activity students are not discerning anything about the structure of this series of numbers; they are simply matching the digit with its matching word form. Another example is Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 5 Lesson 30, Activity 2. In this activity students have cards numbered 5-7. The teacher clearly says a number from 5 to 7, and students hold up the number card for the number read. These problems do not require students to look closely to discern a pattern or structure.
Indicator 2G
Indicator 2G.i
The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that the materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards. Materials occasionally prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards; however, there are very few opportunities for students to both construct arguments and analyze the arguments of others together.
In the lessons provided in the Teacher Resources Part 1 and 2, examples identified as MP3 are often in a whole group or small group discussion. Students rarely have the opportunity to either construct viable arguments or to critique the reasoning of others in a meaningful way because of the heavy scaffolding of the program. For example, in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 10 Lesson 2, students are asked if 11 or 12 is greater and then asked to explain why. Students are not given an opportunity to analyze the arguments of others.
There are several instances where MP3 is incorrectly identified in the materials:
- Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 1 Lesson 4, the Counting Correctly activity, is labeled MP3. In this activity students are taught three elements of counting objects correctly- touching each object once, saying one number for every object touched, and saying the counting numbers in the correct order. Students show a thumbs up or down to indicate if the teacher is counting correctly, but students are not constructing viable arguments or analyzing the arguments of others.
- In Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 4 Lesson 33 the teacher is holding up fingers to represent the numbers 9 and 10. The teacher shows either 9 or 10 and has the class say the number together. Then the teacher is then prompted to ask, “Is there another way to show 10 using my fingers? (no)." Students are not constructing viable arguments or analyzing the arguments of others.
- In Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 9 Lesson 16 students are shown a 3-D shape such as a sphere. The teacher asks “Is this a sphere,” and students respond with a thumbs up or down. Students provide no justification about why it is a sphere.
Indicator 2G.ii
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the expectation of assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.
Within lessons, the teacher materials are not always clear about how teachers will engage and support students in constructing viable arguments or critiquing the reasoning of others. Materials identified with the MP3 standard often direct teachers to "chose a student to answer" or "have a volunteer fill in the blank." Questions are provided but often do not encourage students to deeply engage in MP3. In addition, although answers are provided, there are no follow up questions to help re-direct students who didn’t understand.
- Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 1 Lesson 14 page 57: The teacher is told to alternate between counting correctly and incorrectly and have students signal if the teacher has counted correctly or incorrectly. "Have students identify mistakes and discuss them as a class."
- Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 3 Lesson 2 page 9: "Does this look like a wheel? (no) Is this a circle? (no)."
- Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 4 Lesson 33 page 30: The teacher holds up either 9 or 10 fingers and has the class say the number together. Then asks "Is there another way to show 10 using your fingers? (no)." The teacher calls out 9 or 10 and has students show the number of their fingers.
- Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 9 Lesson 17: The teacher holds up various shapes, and students do thumbs up or thumbs down if the shape is a cylinder. It also states "you can prompt students by asking whether the object looks like a can."
Overall, some questions are provided for teachers to assist their students in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others; however, additional follow-up questions and direct support for teachers is needed.
Indicator 2G.iii
The materials reviewed for Jump Math Kindergarten partially meet the expectation for attending to the specialized language of mathematics. Overall, there are several examples of the mathematical language being introduced and appropriately reinforced throughout the unit, but there are times the materials do not attend to the specialized language of mathematics.
Although no glossary is provided in the materials, each unit introduction includes a list of important vocabulary, and each lesson includes a list of vocabulary that will be used in that lesson. The teacher is provided with explanations of the meanings of some words.
- In Teacher Resources part 1, page A-21 states that “words being introduced and defined for the first time are presented in bold font in the list and in italics in the lesson plans.”
- Unit introductions sometimes include vocabulary. For example, in Teacher Resources Part 1 Unit 3 page E-1 , there is discussion about the teacher using "quadrilaterals," "pentagons," "parallelograms," and so on but states "you do not need to use these words with your students."
- Vocabulary words are listed at the beginning of each lesson plan in the Teacher’s Guide, but definitions, if any, are within the lesson.
While the materials attend to the specialized language of mathematics most of the time, there are instances where this is not the case.
- Often students are not required to provide explanations and justifications, especially in writing, which would allow them to attend to the specialized language of mathematics. For example, in Teacher Resources Part 2 Unit 9 Lesson 15, vocabulary includes the terms count and number. Each time, however, that these words are used in the lesson, they are used by the teacher. The student is not required to provide an explanation or justification for their answers that would allow them to use the words in this lesson.
- Many of the discussion prompts provided are guided by the teacher so that the student is merely repeating the teacher's language. This limits student ability to actively use mathematical language.