About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Fishtank Plus ELA K-2 | ELA
ELA K-2
The instructional materials for Fishtank Plus Grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment and building knowledge but do not meet the expectations for usability. The materials include texts that are well-crafted. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. Because a similar topic or theme connects all units, students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge-building. There is not sufficient support or guidance in the program provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. While some guidance is provided, the suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of additional materials and scaffolds to the teacher.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 2nd Grade
Alignment Summary
The Fishtank Plus Grade 2 materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.
2nd Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to Standards Components
Instructional materials include content-rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award-winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders and cultures. Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Instructional materials increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences, and examine the structure of texts. Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year and include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions and connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year.
Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year, as the teacher models shared writing and students practice during independent writing using drawings, oral sentences, and writing. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards, and students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Materials provide explicit instruction, practice and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Materials provide some explicit instruction of grade-level grammar and usage standards by embedding skills, modeling, guided practice, shared writing, and classroom discussions in some lessons. Both the Literature and Science and Social Studies units include explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards and provide opportunities for students to practice and authentically apply their learning. Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Instructional materials include content rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders and cultures. Each unit includes both literary and informational texts based on an appropriate grade level theme or topic. The anchor texts in each Literature and Science/Social Studies unit include a variety of genres including but not limited to, realistic and historical fiction, informational, plays, articles, fantasy, biography, autobiography, folktale, encyclopedia, poetry, illustrative guide, and fairytale. The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 51% informational and 49% literary. Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Quantitative, qualitative, and associated tasks have an overall complexity of accessible and moderate. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Some texts that may be at a lower Lexile are more complex in qualitative measures making them appropriate for the grade level. The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes a justification for the texts selected for the program and their educational placement in the grade, as well as a detailed analysis of the texts’ qualitative features. Instructional materials increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. The Teacher Tools section includes independent reading supports, such as independent reading guidelines, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
Instructional materials include content-rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award-winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders, and cultures. Each unit contains texts based on literary themes and science and social studies topics that are age-appropriate and appealing to students. Texts are often read multiple times for different purposes. Texts contain academic vocabulary and varied complex sentence structures including verse and prose. Multi-dimensional text features to support student learning and task completion.
Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Cinderella: An Islamic Tale by Fawzia Gilani contains academic vocabulary, Arabic terms, and complex sentence structure.
In Literature Unit 2, Ants by Melissa Stewart is an engaging informational text with academic vocabulary, a glossary, and vibrant photographs.
In Literature Unit 3, Pinky Rex and the Bully by James Howe is an early chapter book with dialogue, and relatable characters and situations.
In Literature Unit 4, Zappato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules is a chapter book containing complex sentence structure, Spanish words, cartoon illustrations, and dialogue.
In Literature Unit 5, Keena Ford and the Second Grade Mix-Up by Melissa Thomson is a chapter book that includes humor, relatable characters, and complex sentence structure.
In Literature Unit 6, Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly is a realistic fiction narrative including dialogue, colorful illustrations, and Fenway Park facts.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, A Desert Habitat by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay features academic vocabulary, photographs, a table of contents, and an index.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Insectlopedia by Doughlas Florian is an informational text with strong engaging content, rich language, and colorful illustrations.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, The Storyteller’s Candle by Lucia Gonzalez is a bilingual English-Spanish text with academic vocabulary and a strong theme of immigration.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo contains academic language and figurative language.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, The Digestive System by Jennifer Prior has academic vocabulary, photographs, and labeled diagrams.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce is an informational text with photos, colorful illustrations, academic vocabulary, and complex sentence structures.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
Instructional materials include a variety of literary and informational texts. The anchor texts in each Literature and Science/Social Studies unit include a variety of genres including but not limited to, realistic and historical fiction, informational, plays, articles, fantasy, biography, autobiography, folktale, encyclopedia, poetry, illustrative guide, and fairytale. The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 51% informational and 49% literary.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Mufaro’s Beautiful Daughters: An African Tale by John Steptoe (fairytale)
The Talking Eggs by Robert D. SanSouci (folktale)
What Culture? by Bobbie Kalman (illustrative guide)
In Literature Unit 2, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst (folktale)
Anansi’s Feast: A West African Trickster Tale by Glenn McCarty (play)
In Literature Unit 3, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Pinky and Rex by James Howe (narrative)
In Literature Unit 4, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Zapata Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules (narrative)
In Literature Unit 5, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Freckle Juice by Judy Blume (narrative)
In Literature Unit 6, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly (realistic fiction)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
A Forest Habitat by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay (reference guide)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Insect Bodies by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian (guide)
Ants by Melissa Stwart (informational)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Coming to America: The Story of Immigration by Betsy Maestro (historical fiction)
Brothers in Hope: The Story of the Lost Boys of Sudan by Mary Williams (biography)
Islandborn by Junot Diaz (realistic fiction)
My Diary from Here to There by Amanda Irma Perez (autobiography)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Barack Obama: Son of Promise, Child of Hope by Nikki Grimes (biography)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
First Human Body Encyclopedia DK Reference (encyclopedia)
Good Enough to Eat: A Kid’s Guide to Food and Nutrition by Lizzy Rockwell (informational)
“An Oasis on Wheels” by Kio Herrera (article)
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
The Gods and Goddesses of Olympus by Aliki (informational)
“Ancient Greek Vases” YouTube (video)
Materials reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 51% informational and 49% literary.
The balance of informational and literary texts within each unit is as follows:
Literature Unit 1 contains 10 core texts and Science/Social Studies Unit 1 contains four core texts. Of the 14 core texts included in these units, 36% are informational and 64% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains four informational texts and zero literary texts, and the Literature Unit contains one informational text and nine literary texts.
Literature Unit 2 contains two core texts and Science/Social Studies Unit 2 contains six core texts. Of the eight core texts included in these units, 75% are informational and 25% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains all of the informational texts and the Literature Unit contains all of the literary texts.
Literature Unit 3 contains four core texts and Science/Social Studies Unit 3 contains 11 core texts. Of the 15 core texts included in these units, 13% are informational and 87% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains two informational texts and nine literary texts, and the Literature Unit contains zero informational texts and four literary texts.
Literature Unit 4 contains two core texts and Science/Social Studies Unit 4 contains 15 core texts. Of the 17 core texts included in these units, 88% are informational and 12% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains all of the informational texts and the Literature Unit contains all of the literary texts.
Literature Unit 5 contains two core texts and Science/Social Studies Unit 5 contains one core text and five supplemental texts. Of the three core texts included in this unit, 33% are informational and 67% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains all of the informational texts and the Literature Unit contains all of the literary texts.
Literature Unit 6 contains one core text and Science/Social Studies Unit 6 contains one core text and three supplemental texts. Of the two core texts included in this unit, 50% are informational and 50% are literary. The Science/Social Studies Unit contains all of the informational texts and the Literature Unit contains all of the literary texts.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1c.
Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Quantitative, qualitative, and associated tasks have an overall complexity of accessible and moderate. The Lexile level range is from 470L to 1010L. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Some texts that may be at a lower Lexile are more complex in qualitative measures making them appropriate for the grade level. The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes a justification for the texts selected for the program and their educational placement in the grade, as well as a detailed analysis of the texts’ qualitative features.
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, the Read-Aloud text The Talking Eggs by Robert de san Souci has a quantitative rating of 870L. The qualitative measure is high due to academic vocabulary, complex sentence structure, and detailed illustrations. The associated task is challenging. Students analyze how the author uses character traits to demonstrate the lesson or moral of the story by analyzing details that describe character traits and the lesson.
In Literature Unit 2, the Read-Aloud text Anansi's Feast: A West African Trickster Tale by Glenn McCarty is a non-prose text. The qualitative level is moderate due to the genre being a folktale play. The associated task is moderate. Students read and act out the play.
In Literature Unit 4, the Read-Aloud text Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Springs Into Action by Jacqueline Jules has a quantitative rating of 620L. The qualitative rating is medium due to the text being a chapter book with complex sentence structure, onomatopoeia, cartoon illustrations and dialogue. The associated task is rated as high. Students retell and chart key events. Students write in response to the prompt, “Describe Freddie and Mr. Vaslov. What motivates them both? Why? How do they show friendship?”
In Literature Unit 6, the Read-Aloud text Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly has a quantitative rating of 590L. The qualitative rating is medium due to the dialogue and illustrations. The associated task is rated as high. Students must brainstorm a mystery story, including all elements of a mystery and write the first chapter of their story, introducing the setting, detectives, and mystery.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, the Read-Aloud text Insect Life Cycles by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian has a quantitative rating of 760L. The qualitative level is high due to strong content and academic vocabulary. The associated task is accessible. Students use this text for multiple lessons. Students describe metamorphosis, the key phases in the insect life cycle, the differences between complete and incomplete insect life cycles, and the stages of a butterfly’s life cycle.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, the Read-Aloud text Islandborn by Junot Diaz has a quantitative rating of 600L. The qualitative level is medium due to the text having academic vocabulary, a strong theme, and the need for background knowledge on immigration. The associated task is medium. Students use the text for multiple lessons. Students describe the memories the characters took with them when they moved and analyze the author’s purpose for writing.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, the Read-Aloud text Malala Yousafzai: Champion for Education by Jodie Shepherd has a quantitative rating of 520L. The qualitative level is moderate due to relatable characters and photographs. The associated task is challenging. Students answer text-dependent questions, write sentences with partners using teacher provided sentence starters, and describe what they would have done if they were Malala.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, the Read-Aloud text First Human Body Encyclopedia has a quantitative rating of 820L. The qualitative level is moderate due to the photographs, diagrams, and academic language. The associated task is high. Students answer text-dependent questions, respond to the Target Task question with a partner, and write in response to the Target Task question.
Anchor/core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level at times. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes quantitative and qualitative complexity information for some texts. Some of the text complexity information is a summary of the unit texts rather than text-specific information, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of the provided qualitative information. Materials do not provide associated task complexity information. The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics on The Lexile Framework for Reading site.
In Literature Unit 2, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range of texts for the unit, as well as qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst, is a folktale. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because they are in the Grade 3 Lexile band and have a clear structure with a chronological sequence of events.
In Literature Unit 3, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range of texts and qualitative information. The Shared Reading text, Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe, is fiction. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because most are beginning chapter books at the high end of the Grade 2 Lexile band and have simple text structures, relatable plots, and a chronological sequence of events.
In Literature Unit 6, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range of texts for the unit, as well as qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, Growing Up in Ancient Greece by Chris Chelepi, is an informational text. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because of their text structure, knowledge demands, and vocabulary.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range of texts for the unit, as well as qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, Bees by Laura Marsh, is a nonfiction text. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because each is in the Grade 2 to Grade 3 Lexile band and contain simple text features, illustrations, and academic vocabulary.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range of texts and qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, The Arabic Quilt: An Immigration Story by Aya Khalil, is a fiction text. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because of their high Lexile levels, nuanced characters and situations, and background knowledge demands.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, the Text Selection Rationale provides the Lexile range of texts and qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, First Human Body Encyclopedia is an Encyclopedia featuring rigorous vocabulary and knowledge demands as well as photographs and diagrams.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1d.
Instructional materials include both Literature units and Science/Social Studies units which increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts range in complexity from 470L to 1010L. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. Students progress to reading chapter books and focus on fluency, building stamina, character traits, and story plots. Supporting teacher resources include suggestions to build background knowledge, anchor charts, and discussion prompts to support comprehension. Texts represent a diverse range of perspectives, feelings, and experiences. Texts often span multiple lessons, appear in multiple associated tasks, and are grouped with other selections to build content knowledge.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, texts range in quantitative complexity from AD540L to 1000L. In Lesson 10, students listen to the fairytale, Yeh-Shen: A Cinderella Story from China by Ai-Ling Louie. Before listening to the next portion of the text, students recount the first part of the fairytale from prior reading with a partner. While reading the text aloud, the teacher stops to ask students text-dependent questions. Students write independently in response to the prompt, “What lesson does the story teach us? Why do you think that?” Teachers circulate to ensure that students support their answers with text evidence. To close, students debate whether or not the king should have made that decision, using text to justify their position.
In Literature Unit 3, texts range in quantitative complexity from 490L to 580L, as students move from teacher-directed read-alouds to student-directed shared and/or independent reading. In Lesson 13, students read Chapters 5–6 of the book, Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe. Students review what happened at the end of the last chapter and answer questions about the key details of the text while reading. Students pair up to write about the lessons that Pinky and Rex learn, using “because”/ “but”/“so” strategy. To close, student pairs share their work with the class.
In Literature Unit 6, the sole shared reading text for the unit has a quantitative complexity of 590L. In Lesson 17, students read chapter 9 of Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly. While reading, students stop to answer text-dependent questions about the main events. Students practice writing four types of sentences to describe the illustration on page 94. Students end the lesson by explaining why the main characters were MVPs by determining the central message.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, texts range in quantitative complexity from 470L to 520L. In Lesson 15, the teacher reads aloud pages 1–17 of Water Habitats by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian, stopping to ask students questions about the main idea. Students summarize the main ideas using details from the text orally and in writing.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, texts range in quantitative complexity from AD 600L to 800L. In Lesson 6, the teacher and students read pages 1–20 of the text, Gittel’s Journey: An Ellis Island Story by Lesléa Newman and Amy June Bates. While reading, students answer questions about the central ideas. After reading, students describe the challenges the main character faced when immigrating to the U.S.A. by identifying the main ideas in the text orally and/or in writing.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, texts range in quantitative complexity from 590L to 900L. In Lesson 3, the teacher reads pages 26–37 of the book, Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce. Before listening to the assigned portion of the text, students respond to a prompt in a stop and jot. While listening to the read-aloud text, students answer questions about the central idea. After listening, students reflect and discuss what they learned about gods and goddesses. Students describe two of the gods they read about and explain what makes them unique using details from the text to support their thinking in writing.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 10, while listening to Yeh-Shen: A Cinderella Story from China by Ai-Ling Louie, materials include the following student supports: fluency practice, vocabulary instruction, building background knowledge, setting a purpose for reading, language supports, and scaffolded questioning and prompting. Students spend multiple days reading and discussing the same book.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 13, while reading Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe, materials provide student supports through the use of partner tasks, sentence stems, building background knowledge, fluency, and foundational support on how to read dialogue, review of previous chapters, setting a purpose for reading, vocabulary instruction, and scaffolded questioning.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 17, student supports for reading Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly includes partner tasks, sentence writing, building background knowledge, vocabulary support, scaffolded questions and prompts, quick review, setting a purpose for reading, genre review for mystery before reading, foundational skills support, and language support.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 15, the teacher reads aloud Water Habitats by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian. Materials include student supports, such as vocabulary instruction, building background knowledge, setting a purpose for reading, foundational skills support, scaffolded questions and prompts, peer discussion, sentence frames, and paragraph frames.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 6, during a shared reading of a portion of Gittel’s Journey: An Ellis Island Story by Lesléa Newman and Amy June Bates, materials include the following student supports: vocabulary instruction, building background knowledge, genre information before reading, setting a purpose for reading, foundational skills support, video examples, scaffolded questions, and peer discussions.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 3, the teacher reads aloud a portion of Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce. Materials include student supports, such as vocabulary instruction, building background knowledge, genre information before reading, setting a purpose for reading, foundational skills support, teacher modeling, scaffolded questions and prompting, and peer discussions.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1e.
Materials include a large volume of literary and informational texts that range in variety. The Text and Materials tab includes a link to a suggested text list for Independent Reading. Guidance in the Teacher Tools section recommends allotting an additional 25–30 minutes a day for independent reading. The Teacher Tools section includes independent reading supports, such as independent reading guidelines, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 7, students read the folktale “How Spider Got a Bald Head” from The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst. Students respond to various Key Questions during reading and use the evidence from their responses to answer the Target Task question, “Is Spider helpful? Defend why or why not.”
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 1, students read Chapter 1 of the fiction text, Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules and work in partner groups to orally respond to the following prompt, “How does Freddie feel about the shoes? Why?”
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 14, students read Chapter 8 of Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly. Before reading the chapter, students retell Chapter 7. While reading the text, students respond to several Key Questions. Afterwards, students write in response to the Target Task to demonstrate using important details and key events to connect earlier and later parts of the text.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 16, students read the second half of the illustrative reference guide, Water Habitats by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian. Students orally plan with a partner before writing their response to the Target Task, “Describe a pond, river, and swamp habitat. How do plants and animals depend on their habitats? (You may choose two to describe.)”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 26, students read the first half of the fiction text, The Arabic Quilt: An Immigration Story by Aya Khalil and “[d]escribe the confusing feelings some immigrants have when they immigrate to a new country by identifying character actions, dialogue, and feelings.” Students use two to three details from the text to support their response to the Target Task, “Mrs. Haugen tells Kanzi that ‘being bilingual is beautiful.’ Does Kanzi agree?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 2, students read the nonfiction text, Me and My Amazing Body by Joan Sweeney. Students discuss why their body is amazing using provided because, but, so sentence frames and then write in response to the Target Task, “Identify and explain two to three different parts of the human body and why each part is important.”
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, there are a total of 27 lessons. Students read nine texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 16 fiction and three nonfiction text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Cinderella Around the World.” Students read two portions of What is Culture by Bobbie Kalman in Lesson 1 and two versions of Cinderella during Lessons 2–5. After focusing on sentence-writing in Lesson 6, students read a Caribbean version of Cinderella in Lesson 7. In Lesson 8, students compare and contrast two of the Cinderella story versions “by describing how the setting impacts the characters and plot of a story.” Students read Yeh-Shen: A Cinderella Story from China by Ai-Ling Louie in Lessons 9–10, complete another sentence writing lesson during Lesson 11, and read The Egyptian Cinderella by Shirley Climo in Lesson 12. After comparing and contrasting the last two Cinderella versions read, students read Mufaro’s Beautiful Daughters: An African Tale by John Steptoe in Lessons 14–15 and The Talking Eggs by Robert D. San Souci in Lessons 16–17. Students “[d]etermine if a sentence is a complete sentence or incomplete sentence” in Lesson 18 and then read The Rough-Face Girl by Rafe Martin in Lessons 19–20.
In Literature Unit 3, there are a total of 21 lessons. Students read four texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 15 text suggestions, including additional texts by James Howe and fiction and nonfiction texts with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Belonging and Friendship: Pinky and Rex.” Students read Pinky and Rex by James Howe in Lessons 1–4, Pinky and Rex and the Bully by James Howe in Lessons 6–9, Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe in Lessons 11–13, and Pinky and Rex and the School Play by James Howe in Lessons 15–17. Students complete discussion and writing activities in between finishing one text and starting a new one.
In Literature Unit 5, there are a total of 26 lessons. Students read two texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains one additional text by Melissa Thomson and 20 text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Learning From Mistakes: Keena Ford.” Students read Freckle Juice by Judy Blume in Lessons 1–5, complete a sentence-level grammar task in Lesson 6, and participate in a discussion and writing activity in Lesson 7. Spanning across Lessons 8–24, students spend 13 lessons reading Keena Ford by Melissa Thomson, with pause points for sentence-level grammar or discussion and writing tasks in Lessons 6–7, 12, 15, 19, and 24.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, there are a total of 26 lessons. Students read six texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 16 fiction and nonfiction text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Awesome Insects.” In Lessons 1–2, students read Insect Bodies by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian. After completing a discussion and writing activity in Lesson 3, students read Insect Life Cycles by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian in Lessons 4–6. Students complete another discussion and writing task in Lesson 7 and read Ants by Melissa Stewart in Lessons 8–9. After completing a discussion and writing task in Lesson 10, students read Bees by Laura Marsh in Lessons 11–13. Students spend Lessons 15–16 reading five poems from Insectlopedia by Douglas Florian and Lessons 17–19 reading excerpts of Helpful and Harmful Insects by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, there are a total of 32 lessons. Students read 15 texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 22 informational text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “People Who Changed the World.” Students read Honda: The Boy who Dreamed of Cars by Mark Weston in Lessons 1–2, How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo and Jacqueline Tourville in Lesson 3, and Sharuko: Peruvian Archeologist by Monica Brown in Lessons 4–5. After completing a sentence-level grammar lesson on subordinating conjunctions in Lesson 6, students read Buzzing with Questions: The Inquisitive Mind of Charles Henry Turner by Janice N. Harrington in Lessons 7–8 and Queen of Physics: How Wu Chien Shiung Helped Unlock the Secrets of the Atom by Teresa Robeson in Lessons 9–10. Students complete a discussion and writing activity in Lesson 11 and read two different anchor texts in Lessons 12 and 13. Students read Mario and the Hole in the Sky: How a Chemist Saved our Planet by Elizabeth Rusch and Teresa Martinez in Lessons 14–15, complete another sentence-level grammar lesson on subordinating conjunctions in Lesson 16, and read Farmer Will Allen and the Growing Table by Jacqueline Briggs Martin and Eric-Shabazz Larkin in Lesson 17. Students complete another discussion and writing task in Lesson 18 and read two texts on Sonia Sotomayor in Lessons 19–20 and 21–22 respectively. After comparing and contrasting the Sonia Sotomayor texts in Lesson 23, students read two texts about Barack Obama in Lessons 24 and 25 respectively. Students finish out the biography-based unit reading two texts about Malala Yousafzai in Lessons 27 and 28 respectively and compare and contrast the texts in Lesson 29.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, there are a total of 23 lessons. Students read three texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 11 text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Exploring Ancient Greece.” Throughout the unit, students toggle between reading portions of the core text, Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce, and the supporting texts, The Gods and Goddesses of Olympus by Aliki and Growing Up in Ancient Greece by Chris Chelepi. Students spend 11 lessons reading Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House, two lessons reading excerpts of The Gods and Goddesses of Olympus, and two lessons reading sections of Growing Up in Ancient Greece.
There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers.(e.g., proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading, independent reading procedures are included in the lessons.) Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, the Reading Structures and Routines section outlines several ways to incorporate independent reading into daily lessons.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), guidelines for independent reading note the following: tasks should be relevant to students; students should experience a wide range of materials, genres, and text types; students should have choice in both books they read and how they respond to reading; students should have opportunities to share their reading with peers; and students need sustained independent reading time. Guidance encourages teachers to provide books that align with the unit themes and topic for student choice during independent reading.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), the Monitoring Student Comprehension section includes independent reading routines for teacher use to monitor students as they read independently. Independent reading routines include Discussion/Book Groups, Book Talks, Book Reviews, and Conferences. Book Review guidance states, “Students can have one reading log/journal for a variety of purposes, or a separate log/journal for different purposes,” and references the sample Student Independent Reading Log, Student Independent Reading Journal (Writing Prompt), and Student Independent Reading Journal (Summary) templates provided.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), the Planning for Independent Reading section includes questions for teachers to consider as they prepare their classroom for independent reading. This teacher support also contains independent reading weekly planning templates, examples of how teachers can successfully begin and sustain independent reading, and examples of parent letters that address independent reading.
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences, and examine the structure of texts. Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to engage with the text and build content knowledge and provide guidance for teachers to plan and implement text-based questions and tasks. Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year. The Academic Discourse section in the Teacher Tools includes varied protocols for whole group, small group, and partner discussions. Materials include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions and connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year. Support for teachers on how to provide instruction and support with Speaking and Listening can be found in the Academic Discourse Teacher Tool. The majority of discussions pertain to the unit texts or topics and the Teacher Tools also provide guidance for developing and implementing student discussion protocols across the curriculum and include ways to monitor student discussions. Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year. Lessons and the Teacher Tools contain sentence frames, teacher modeling, teacher feedback, writing exemplars, and writing rubric. The teacher models shared writing and students practice during independent writing using drawings, oral sentences, and writing. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards, and students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Teacher instruction attends to the different demands required of opinion, informational, and narrative writing, equipping students with the skills and knowledge to identify qualities of each type. Materials provide explicit instruction, practice and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Although writing lessons do not occur daily, materials provide writing lessons in every unit. Writing opportunities integrate speaking, listening and reading and connect to the texts students listen to.
The teacher leads discussions, models the writing process, and provides sentence frames prior to students engaging in independent writing. Materials provide some explicit instruction of grade-level grammar and usage standards by embedding skills, modeling, guided practice, shared writing, and classroom discussions in some lessons. Materials include a sufficient focus on the grammar and usage standards. Both the Literature and Science and Social Studies units include explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards and provide opportunities for students to practice and authentically apply their learning. Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.
Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences and examine the structure of texts. Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to engage with the text and build content knowledge. Students use pictures and information from texts to support their speaking and writing responses. Materials provide guidance for teachers to plan and implement text-specific questions and tasks. Each lesson includes sample responses to questions and tasks, as well as Language Supports and Additional Supports for discussion questions. The Unit Launch contains the Essential Questions and guidance for teachers to customize the unit for their students. The Teacher Tools section titled Academic Discourse provides guidance for teachers during class discussions.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 7, after reading The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst, students respond to the following text-specific questions: “Why does Spider go help his mother-in-law?”; “Is Spider being helpful? Why or why not?”; “Even though he tried to, Spider could not help himself from eating the beans. Why?”; “Why did Spider tell the people he was doing the hat-shaking dance?”; and “Spider says he is ashamed. Why is he ashamed?”
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 13, students either engage in a read-aloud, read independently or read with a partner Chapters 5 and 6 of the book, Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe. Prior to reading the chapters, students respond to the question, “What happened at the end of Chapter 4? How is Pinky feeling?” During reading, students answer the following text-specific questions: “At the end of Chapter 5, Pinky says ‘all he felt was something stinging in his eyes.’ Explain what this means.”; “Why is Rex chattering on the whole walk home?”; “Why does Pinky wish that he were walking home alone?”; and “How does Rex show friendship and support Pinky in a time of need?”
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 22, students finish reading Keena Ford by Melissa Thomson. Students respond to several Key Questions, such as “What details does the author include to show how Keena is feeling?” and “How does Ms. Campbell feel after Eric explains what happened? How do you know?”, as they analyze how Ms. Campbell is feeling and why.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 4, after reading, Insect Life Cycles by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian, students respond to text-specific questions such as, “What is metamorphosis?” and “How did the diagram help me as a reader?”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 12, students engage in a read-aloud, shared reading, or independent reading of Brothers in Hope: The Story of the Lost Boys of Sudan by Mary Williams. During the reading, students respond to Key Questions including, “What are some reasons people leave their homes to move to a new place?”; “What was Garang’s life like before the war? What did his father tell him?”; “In an instant, Garang and many other Sudanese boys’ lives changed drastically. Explain why.”; “The boys knew the journey to Ethiopia would be dangerous, but they chose to go anyway. What steps did they take to make the journey less dangerous? Why?”, “What other challenges did the boys face? How did they overcome them?” After reading, students discuss and write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “Garang and the other Lost Boys faced many hardships and dangers. Describe the dangers and hardships they faced. What steps did they take to try and overcome the hardships?”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 13, students read Good Enough to Eat: A Kid’s Guide to Food and Nutrition by Lizzy Rockwell. The Target Task students discuss and write in response to the prompt: “Choose two and describe: carbohydrates, protein, fat, and vitamins and minerals. Why are they important for keeping your body healthy?”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 7, while reading Cendrillon: A Caribbean Cinderella by Robert D. San Souci, students respond to text-specific questions such as, “Why did the stepmother and stepsister ‘peer crossly’ at Cendrillon and her godmother?” Materials include the following sample response for teacher use: “The stepmother and stepsister peered crossly at them because they were angry that all the other people at the party were paying attention to the new, pretty girl and asking if she came from France.”
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 5, after reading The Sandwich Swap by Queen Rania Al Abdullah and Kelly DiPucchio, students respond to text-specific questions including, “What do the two girls learn about friendship? How do they learn it?” Materials provide the teacher with this sample response: “The two girls learn that even if someone is a little bit different from you, that is okay, you can still be friends! They learned this lesson when they insulted each other about their lunches and argued. When they were calm, they tried each other's lunches and realized they were pretty good! They became friends again and will never insult each other. Instead, they might ask one another to explain things they do not understand!”
In Literature Unit 5, as students respond to the text-specific question, “Andrew hates Sharon. Why is he running home to try her recipe? (p. 23), materials include the following sample student response: “Even though Andrew hates Sharon, he is running home to try her recipe because he is desperate for freckles. He will do anything to get them, including trusting an enemy. Andrew is gullible!” The Additional Supports section includes two prompts the teacher may use to aid students in their response: “What is Andrew like? How do you know?” and “What does Andrew want?”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 11, after reading Bees by Laura Marsh, students respond to text-specific questions such as, “Describe pollination. Why is it important?” Materials provide the following sample response: “Pollination is when a bee takes pollen from one plant to another. The pollen sticks to tiny hairs on the bee’s body, and when the bee travels to another flower, the pollen brushes off the new flower. Now the new flower could make seeds!” Materials also include the following Language Support: “If you did not pre-teach the difference between ‘pollination,’ ‘pollen,’ and ‘pollinate,’ and students are confused, stop to explain the difference.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 7, as students infer the author’s purpose of Gittel’s Journey: An Ellis Island Story by Lesléa Newman and Amy June Bates, materials include the following guidance and sample student responses: “As students are writing, circulate to look for an accurate author’s purpose. Any of the following would work:
The author wanted to describe the voyage to Ellis Island.
The author wanted to explain how difficult it can be to immigrate to a new country.
The author wanted us to think that the immigrants traveling to a new country are brave.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 8, as students read The Digestive System by Jennifer Prior and answer the question “When and why might a person vomit? (p. 23), materials include the following Language Supports for teacher use: “Tell students that ‘spoiled food’ is food that has gone bad and is no longer safe to eat.” and “Tell students that ‘rapidly’ means quickly.”
In the Teacher Tools, Types of Formative Assessments, materials provide a table that includes teacher guidance on how to utilize the Key Questions as checks for understanding during the daily lesson, as well as how to use the Target Tasks to monitor student comprehension, content knowledge, writing, or oral language development. This section also includes Target Task Rubrics for reading responses.
In the Teacher Tools, Components of an ELA Lesson, materials include definitions for each part of an ELA lesson. In the Internalizing a Lesson section, teacher guidance supports teachers with determining which Key Questions are critical to students understanding the text and Target Task, and brainstorming what support students might need to answer the key questions.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.
Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year. The Academic Discourse section in the Teacher Tools includes varied protocols for whole group, small group, and partner discussions. Materials include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills and provide opportunities for student use of these protocols across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, the Types of Academic Discourse section of Academic Discourse lists the program’s speaking and listening protocols for each tier. Materials provide two whole group, four small group, and five partner discussion protocols.
Whole Class Discussion Protocols: Take a Stand and Fishbowl
Group Discussion Protocols: Simultaneous Round Table, Rally Coach, Talking Chips, and Numbered Heads Together
Partner Conversation Protocols: Think-Pair-Share, Write-Pair-Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share-Revise, and Partner A/B
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Tools contains a section titled Academic Discourse. The Overview page of this section includes links to additional guidance: Preparing for Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse, Tiers of Academic Discourse, and Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse. These supports, which are introduced and reinforced throughout units and linked in lessons, allow teachers to leverage their expertise and select the protocol that best meets the needs of their students and the lesson content.
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 21, students read pages 1–14 of Cinderella by Marcia Brown. After reading, students answer key questions. The teacher circulates to ensure students are providing specific character traits and details. Materials include sentence frames that the teacher may use with students struggling to respond, as an additional support.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 1, students “[d]ebate and analyze what lessons we can learn from the characters in traditional fairy tales and folktales and how these lessons translate to our lives by citing evidence from the entire unit to support an idea.” Materials provide questions for teacher use when leading students in an analysis of the first unit Essential Question: “Think about the character traits of each of the ‘Cinderellas.’ What do they have in common? What lessons did they learn? Think about the character traits of each of the ‘stepmother/sisters.’ What do they have in common?What lessons did they learn?” Materials note that this is students’ “first discussion day of the year.” Guidance directs the teacher to “lead students in a brief conversation about formal and informal discussions.”
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 7, after reading Freckle Juice by Judy Blume, the teacher poses the second Target Task question to students: “What can we learn from Andrew to make our own lives better?” Teacher guidance states, “Decide which type of discussion is best for your class (view our Teacher Tool on Types of Academic Discourse for more information).
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 1, when launching the unit, “students Turn and Talk with a partner in response to the question: ‘What do you already know about habitats?” The teacher explains that they will practice “asking a lot of questions over the course of the unit.” The Suggested Supports inset includes the following Additional Support: “Model how to ask a ‘what’ question as a Think Aloud before students do it independently/in pairs. Tell students that they might wonder about the animals or plants that live there, what they eat, where they live, what they drink, and how they survive. Ask students for other suggestions to share with the class.”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 7, students read the first portion of Buzzing with Questions: The Inquisitive Mind of Charles Henry Turner by Janice N. Harrington. The Suggested Supports inset includes prompting questions as Additional Supports the teacher may use if students are having trouble answering the Key Question for page 1, “What did the author compare Charles’s questions to? Why?” Additional Support questions include, “What does the author want us to know or think? Why? How does reading this make you feel? Are you excited to read the book?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 22, students work in small groups to research four research areas. To prepare for their presentations, materials include guidance directing the teacher to set up the classroom in three areas—Temple, Theater, and Olympics— listing which groups and student products belong in each area, as well as which group the class should begin with. Materials also include the following class discussion question once students have visited all three areas: “What connections can we make between ancient Greece and our society today?”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.
Materials connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year. Support for teachers on how to provide instruction and support with Speaking and Listening can be found in the Academic Discourse Teacher Tool. This tool provides support structures for varied discussions and time for students to develop skills in collaborative, reciprocal conversations that build and develop ideas or the ideas of others through careful listening and responding. The majority of discussions pertain to the unit texts or topics and the Teacher Tools also provide guidance for developing and implementing student discussion protocols across the curriculum and include ways to monitor student discussions. Lessons provide sentence stems for students and recommendations for ways that teachers can model speaking and listening skills.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., gaining the floor in respectful ways, listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 7, students finish reading Freckle Juice by Judy Blume and participate in a close read and discussion. Lesson guidance suggests the teacher use the Tools for Academic Discourse resource to determine which type of discussion to use with their class.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 25, lesson guidance directs the teacher to “[l]ead students in a discussion with the guidance of the Discussion Teacher Tool.” The lesson does not include a link to the Discussion Teacher Tool; rather, the lesson lists potential questions the teacher may ask.
Add drawings or other visual displays to stories or recounts of experiences when appropriate to clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 17, students perform the play, Anansi’s Feast: A West African Trickster Tale adapted for reader’s theater by Glenn McCarty. Students use what they know about the character, Anansi, and his relationships with others to bring the story to life.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 28, after reading texts about various countries throughout the unit, students research a culture that is represented in their class or community and create a presentation that includes text and graphic features to support their understanding.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 9, using information learned from The Digestive System by Jennifer Prior and First Human Body Encyclopedia (author not cited), students work with a partner or in a small group to create a poster of the digestive system. The poster must include six parts of the digestive system with labels and captions that explain what happens at each part.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Build on others' talk in conversations by linking their comments to the remarks of others. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 25, students engage in a discussion comparing and contrasting how plants and animals in a rainforest habitat depend on their surroundings to meet their needs in comparison with how animals and plants in a water habitat meet their needs. At the end of the discussion, students self-assess their participation using the Academic Discourse Rubric (K-2). Tier 2 of the rubric asks students to continue a conversation by building on or asking related questions and seeks to understand their peers’ ideas and builds on with connected ideas.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 17, students debate one of the unit Essential Questions as a class. One of the Suggested Supports insets contains the following Language Support and teacher guidance: “If needed, provide students with the following sentence frames: I think _____________________, because ___________________. I agree with __________________ because _________________. I disagree with _______________ because _________________.” This support may not be utilized during the debate, as lesson guidance directs the teacher to enact the support if needed.
Ask for clarification and further explanation as needed about the topics and texts under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 1, students discuss with partners in a Turn and Talk what they already know about habitats. As students read the text, they ask what questions about the water habitat. After reading, students share some of their questions with a partner or small group and discuss whether they have the same or different questions.
Recount or describe key ideas or details from a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 13, students work in pairs to recount key events in the different versions of Cinderella.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 5, students engage in an in-depth discussion, debate, and description of the three main characters in the book, Pinky and Rex by James Howe.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 19, after reading Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Springs Into Action by Jacqueline Jules, students participate in a class discussion using evidence from the text. Students retell the story, including the setting, problem, key events, solution, and lesson.
In Science and Social Studies, Unit 3, Lesson 4, students use text features and information from Ellis Island by Elizabeth Carney to answer the following question individually, with a partner using Turn and Talk, as a class discussion, or as a Stop and Jot: “What does it help you understand about immigrants?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 3, students work in pairs or small groups to discuss two or three facts they learned about the human body from The First Human Body Encyclopedia (author not cited). Students then share facts with another group.
Ask and answer questions about what a speaker says in order to clarify comprehension, gather additional information, or deepen understanding of a topic or issue. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 31, students participate in a class interview of a local changemaker. The class generates a list of questions for the interview. During the interview, students take notes using the Local Changemaker Interview Graphic Organizer. If the local changemaker cannot participate in an interview, students “look for videos, other online interviews, or news sources about the local changemaker” and “[r]ead/watch them as a class.”
Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 8, students retell and chart the plot of the general Cinderella story while identifying the setting, problem, main events, solution and lesson as a class. After the discussion, students retell and chart the plot for all versions of the Cinderella stories being compared using the Plot Chart independently, in partners, or in small groups.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 19, after reading Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Springs Into Action by Jacqueline Jules students participate in a class discussion using evidence from the text.
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.
Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year. Lessons and the Teacher Tools contain sentence frames, teacher modeling, teacher feedback, writing exemplars, and a writing rubric. The teacher models shared writing and students practice independent writing, constructing detailed sentences and engaging in the full writing process, including editing, revising, and sharing the final draft. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Students learn to self-assess their writing using editing checklists. Materials include some digital resources, such as Google and Youtube videos.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 7, students write to defend whether or not Anansi the Spider is helpful. Students write a paragraph with complete, detailed sentences and evidence from the story “How Spider Got a Bald Head” from The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 2, after reading Chapter 2 of Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules, students write in response to the Target Task question, “What words and phrases does the author include to describe Freddie’s new shoes? Why?” Students must include at least two examples of descriptive language from the text in their response.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 8, students use information from an illustration in Chapter 4 of Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly to write about what is happening. Students must use four types of sentences—statement, question, command, and explanation—when writing about the illustration.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 7, students draw upon their learning from the text A Forest Habitat (Introducing Habitats) by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay to write a page in an informational book explaining how plants and animals depend on their surroundings and other living things to meet their needs in the places they live. Students’ writing must contain complete sentences and key details from the text.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 3, after reading How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo and Jacqueline Tourville, students complete “because, but, so” sentence frames to explain why Temple Grandin did not like hugs and the solution she invented.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 4, students describe two of the gods or goddesses from The Gods and Goddesses of Olympus by Aliki and explain what makes them unique. Students must use precise details from the text to explain how the gods or goddesses are unique.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lessons 18–21, students write a narrative about Anansi the Spider. In Lesson 18, students use a graphic organizer to brainstorm their stories. In Lesson 19, students begin drafting their stories using a graphic organizer. In Lesson 20, students finish drafting their stories and add additional details focusing on character actions, thoughts, and feelings. The teacher provides students with support using the Narrative Writing Feedback and Support, and Sentence Level Feedback and Support from the Teacher Tools. In Lesson 21, students finish writing, revising, and editing their stories. Students use the Editing Checklist(K–2) to self-assess their work, while the teacher uses the Narrative Writing Rubric to assess students’ writing.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, students spend five days writing a story about having a superpower. On Day 1, students use a graphic organizer to brainstorm their stories. On Day 2, students draft their stories and focus on using precise verbs. On Day 3, students finish their drafts and add adverbs to their writing. On Day 4, students write the closings of their stories. On Day 5, students use dictionaries to edit their writing for spelling.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, students write the first chapter of a mystery book. On Day 1, students use the Mystery Planning Graphic Organizer to plan their mystery, including the setting, crime, detectives, suspects, and clues. On Day 2, students draft their stories and focus on “showing, not telling.” On Day 3, students continue their drafts and include a cliffhanger. On Day 4, students edit and publish their mysteries. The teacher evaluates students’ writing using the Narrative Writing Rubric.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, students write an informational insect report. On Day 1, students research their insects and record information on the Insect Notetaker. On Day 2, students finish researching and begin writing their drafts. Students focus on using topic sentences in their drafts, and the teacher supports struggling students by using the Single Paragraph Outline. On Day 3, students add facts and text features to their writing. On Day 4, students revise their writing to make their sentences stronger using the “because, but, so” strategy. On Day 5, students edit their writing and self-assess their work using the Editing Checklist(K–2). The teacher uses the Informational Writing Rubric to assess students’ writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 31, students research a local changemaker and write about how that person changed the community. On Day 1, the class interviews the changemaker, and students record information on the Local Changemaker Interview Graphic Organizer. On Day 2, students use the Single Paragraph Outline to draft a topic sentence, three detail sentences, and a closing sentence. The teacher supports struggling students using the Sentence Level Feedback and Support, and the Paragraph Level Feedback and Support from the Teacher Tools. On Day 3, students revise their topic sentences using subordinating conjunctions and add text features to their writing. On Day 4, students edit and publish their writing. Students can use the Informational Writing Template to publish their writing. The teacher uses the Informational Writing Rubric to assess writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 22, students research and write an informational report on an area in Ancient Greece. On Day 1, students pick an area of interest to research—Ancient Greece, Greek Myths, Theatre, Architecture, or Olympics. Students use computers and a list of provided websites to research their topics. On Day 2, students start their associated projects and written pieces. Each topic has a separate assignment with provided steps. On Day 3, students present their research and projects to the class.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 3, materials include links to two videos about Temple Grandin’s life with autism. Lesson guidance directs the teacher to show one or both of the videos to students.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 22, students research and write an informational report referencing an area in Ancient Greece. Materials provide a list of websites for students to use when conducting their research.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing(year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards. Students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Writing instruction often begins with a task-related discussion followed by teacher modeling and shared writing or a practice activity before students independently craft their own products. Lessons with a writing focus span multiple days. Teacher instruction attends to the different demands required of opinion, informational, and narrative writing equipping students with the skills and knowledge to identify qualities of each type. Supports include sentence frames and prompting questions. Materials ground most writing tasks in the texts students listen to, with texts serving as the basis for prompts or models.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:
Students have 16 out of 44 (36%) opportunities to learn, practice, and apply opinion writing across the school year.
In Literature Unit 1, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Literature Unit 2, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of two writing opportunities for this unit is opinion in nature.
In Literature Unit 3, there are five opportunities for opinion writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Literature Unit 4, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Literature Unit 5, there are three opportunities for opinion writing. Three of four writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Literature Unit 6, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, there are three opportunities for opinion writing. Three of six writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, there are three opportunities for opinion writing. Three of five writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of four writing opportunities for this unit is opinion in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:
Students have 20 out of 44 (45%) opportunities to learn, practice, and apply informative/explanatory writing across the school year.
In Literature Unit 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Literature Unit 5, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of four writing opportunities for this unit is informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, there are four opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Three of six writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, there are two opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Two of five writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, there are four opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Three of four writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:
Students have eight out of 44 (18%) opportunities to learn, practice, and apply narrative writing across the school year.
In Literature Unit 1, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. This is the sole writing opportunity for this unit.
In Literature Unit 2, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. One of two writing opportunities for this unit is narrative in nature.
In Literature Unit 3, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Literature Unit 4, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. This is the sole writing opportunity for this unit.
In Literature Unit 5, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Literature Unit 6, there are five opportunities for narrative writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are narrative in nature.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
Explicit instruction in opinion writing:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 16, the teacher leads students in a discussion of which traits Spider has are positive or negative. The teacher uses the Take a Stand protocol to have students debate whether Spider uses his positive or negative traits more. Next, the teacher leads students in a discussion of the best ways to describe Spider. The teacher provides sentence frames, but does not model writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 10, the teacher leads a discussion on how to best record information for the task. Next, the teacher leads students through the Write-Pair-Share and Take a Stand Protocols to brainstorm ideas of whether an ant would survive in a rainforest habitat. The teacher uses the students’ ideas to model writing complex sentences using the conjunctions “but” and “so.”
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 7, the teacher gives students cut out cards of the life cycle of a butterfly and leads students to explain the stages of the life cycle. The teacher explains how to expand sentences using “because.” The teacher writes “First, Then, Next, After, Finally” on the board and prompts students to use the transition words as they describe the stages of the life cycle.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 11, the teacher guides students to analyze the text structure of Growing Up in Ancient Greece by Chris Chelepi as a model to write multiple paragraphs about a topic. The teacher models writing multiple paragraphs about Greece. Next, the teacher circulates as students are writing to see if they have details to support their thinking. The teacher uses the Paragraph Level Feedback and Support tool to give feedback.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, on Day 1, the teacher models brainstorming ideas for a story using a graphic organizer. On Day 2, the teacher models using precise verbs in sentences and gives feedback on writing using the Narrative Writing Feedback and Support tool. On Day 3, the teacher models using adverbs in sentences and gives feedback on writing using the Narrative Writing Feedback and Support tool. On Day 4, the teacher models how to write a closing for a story and gives feedback on writing using the Narrative Writing Feedback and Support tool. On Day 5, the teacher models how to use a dictionary to look up words for spelling accuracy.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. For example:
Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing.
Write opinion pieces in which they introduce the topic or book they are writing about, state an opinion, supply reasons that support the opinion, use linking words (e.g., because, and, also) to connect opinion and reasons, and provide a concluding statement or section.
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 16, students “stop and jot the traits they brainstormed along the way that described Spider” and debate whether they think Spider uses his positive or negative traits more. Students examine their notes and reflect on class conversations as they “think about which ideas and reasons are most compelling to describe Spider.” Students write in response to the prompt as they describe Spider and include at least two to three details that support their thinking. Students may use two sentence frames as language supports, if needed.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 18, students read the article “An Oasis on Wheels'' by Kio Herrera. Afterwards, the teacher tells students “In 2017, about 17 percent of Americans lived more than half a mile from a supermarket. That means they do not have easy access to fresh, nutritious food.” Students plan a way to get more nutritious food to families and write a letter to the mayor of their town or city, convincing them to adopt their idea.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example:
Write informative/explanatory texts in which they introduce a topic, use facts and definitions to develop points, and provide a concluding statement or section.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 7, after a close reading and discussion of Freckle Juice by Judy Blume, students write to explain how other people influenced the decisions that Andrew made and what they can learn from him to make their lives better.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 9, students write a paragraph and create a poster that shows what happens after food has been eaten as it travels through the digestive system over the course of two to three days. Writing must include specific details and diagrams to support student explanations.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example:
Write narratives in which they recount a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events, include details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide a sense of closure.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 15, students “write a newspaper article detailing what has been happening at Fenway Park by retelling key details and characters’ perspectives on events.” Students work with a partner to discuss the key events of Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly. After debriefing the key events as a class, students independently write their newspaper article, which must include the title of the newspaper, a heading, an image or photograph, and writing about key events. Students use the Editing Checklist (K–2) to assess their writing. Once students finish their newspaper articles, they read them out loud to a partner, using expression as if they were a reporter on the scene.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 5, students listen to a read aloud of Cinderella: An Islamic Tale by Fawzia Gilani and answer key questions about the text. Students discuss the following writing prompt with a partner: “The queen says, ‘It is rare to find young ladies with such good character.’ How did the queen know that Cinderella had a good character? How else does Cinderella, or Zahra, show good character?” Afterwards, students write in response to the prompt making sure to add at least one piece of evidence from the text while connecting their response to the ideas that good character in this culture means being faithful to Allah.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, to support students with writing the closing to their narrative stories, the teacher reads an exemplar closing sentence and rereads the endings of the two Freddie Ramos books covered during the unit. The teacher facilitates a student discussion about the closings using the following questions: “How did the author choose to close these stories? Do you think it was a good ending? Why or why not?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 4, students read A Forest Habitat by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay to answer key questions about how the author uses bolded words in the text. Students independently write, explaining how the author used text features to teach about a forest habitat and providing two details to support their answer.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 20, the teacher uses the text Helpful and Harmful Insects by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian to support students with writing topic and supporting sentences. After reading the topic sentence of the first paragraph on page 16, the teacher asks, “What is the main topic of this paragraph? What are we going to learn about?” The teacher then reads the supporting sentences and asks, “What details about the main topic did we get in these sentences?” Using sentence strips prepared by the teacher, students work with a partner to identify the topic sentence and supporting sentences from the first paragraph on page 22. Students work with the teacher to generate potential topic sentences for their shared writing task.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 11, after reading pages 92–93 of First Human Body Encyclopedia (author not cited), students describe how the bladder works and why it is an important part of the urinary system.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 11, to support students with multi-paragraph writing, the teacher draws students’ attention to pages 10–11 of Growing Up In Ancient Greece by Chris Chelepi. The teacher asks, “What do you notice about how the author has organized the information?” and “[guides] students to notice that the author has multiple paragraphs, each talking about something a little different that has to do with the overall heading.” The teacher uses their notes about school in ancient Greece to model placing the information in buckets and writing the first paragraph based on their notes. The teacher and students write the second paragraph together. To prepare for independent writing, students “look at their notes, decide which topics they are going to write about, think about how they will break them into groups and then start writing!”
Indicator 1K
Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the expectations of Indicator 1k.
Materials provide explicit instruction, practice, and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Although writing lessons do not occur daily, materials provide writing lessons in every unit. Writing opportunities integrate speaking, listening, and reading and connect to the texts students listen to. Students use details from the readings in their illustrations and labels. The teacher leads discussions, models the writing process, and provides sentence frames prior to students engaging in independent writing.
Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to practice and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 8, students compare and contrast two versions of Cinderella by describing how the setting impacts the characters and the plot of a story. Students use the Plot Chart to compare and contrast versions of the text with teacher support.
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 16, students pick a word that best describes Spider and defends why that word is the best descriptive word. The teacher leads a class discussion of Spider’s traits and uses the Take A Stand Protocol to have students debate whether Spider has more positive or negative traits. The teacher reminds students to use unit vocabulary and includes two to three details to explain their thinking. Teacher modeling is suggested only when needed.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 5, students use Character Maps to create sentences describing how Rex is a good friend using evidence from the text to support their thinking.
In LIterature Unit 5, Lesson 7, students explain how other people influenced the decisions that Andrew made and what we can learn to make our lives better by identifying and interpreting key details that support the main lesson of a text.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 14, students compare and contrast how plants and animals in two habitats depend on their surroundings to meet their needs. Students identify key details from two texts. Students utilize a graphic organizer and the teacher provides feedback when they circulate around the room.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, students write the first chapter of a mystery story and include the mystery elements. The teacher reviews the elements of a mystery using a completed graphic organizer. It is suggested the teacher might want to do the graphic organizer with the students. The teacher explains the definition of a cliffhanger and provides an example. Students are asked to “show not tell” and include elements of a mystery. At this time, students have not practiced “show not tell”.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, students research and write an informational text about an insect of their choice. The teacher explains the task and provides students with a list of insects. The teacher provides a graphic organizer and resources for students to research, but does not model researching or using the graphic organizer. The teacher focuses the rest of the lesson on language skills and expanding individual sentences, not on the overall task.
In Social Studies and Science Unit 3, Lesson 3, students explain why the United States is called “a nation of immigrants” by writing simple sentences in the past tense. Students analyze examples of past tense sentences, and with a partner, practice changing verbs to past tense. Students use past tense to write three to four sentences that answer the Target Task question.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 30, students explain how a person from the unit changed the world and the steps it took for the person to create the change. The teacher leads the class in a review discussion of each book used in the unit and how it answers the question. The teacher encourages students to use vocabulary from the unit and provides sentence stems if needed such as “___ changed the world by ___., “For example, ___”, and “Also, ___”. The teacher does not model planning, writing, or using specific evidence.
In Social Studies and Science Unit 5, Lesson 12, students write a paragraph and create a poster that describes the urinary system by writing a well-constructed paragraph that explains what happens to fluids in the human body using specific details from the text to support their explanation.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, students explain different events that took place at the early Olympics. The teacher explains the task and informs students they will use the structure of the unit texts as a guide for their reports. The teacher reminds students they need to include a heading, a topic sentence, details that connect, facts, and a closing sentence. The teacher leads a discussion and notetaking of running in the Olympics and guides students to plan to group information into different paragraphs. Although the lesson states the teacher looks at the text to review what they know about running, there is no specific modeling of using the text to locate the information. The teacher does not model how to use notes to write a paragraph.
Writing opportunities are focused on students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 16, students write which word they believe best describes Spider and defend their opinion. Students must name a character trait of Spider and provide at least two examples from the unit stories to support their thinking.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 20, students argue whether kids and robots can be best friends using details about Pinky and Rex’s relationship from the book series. Students watch a video about kids and robots and take notes on ways they can be friends. Students write down all the evidence they have for each opinion and choose an opinion to write about. Students have a class discussion after they plan orally with a partner and come up with an opinion sentence and reasons from books and/or the video that support their opinion.
In LIterature Unit 5, Lesson 19, students write a letter to Keena describing what she should do. Students state a claim and support the claim with details from the text and personal connections.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 14, students write an argumentative piece on whether a bee would survive in a rainforest habitat. Students discuss this claim and make graphic organizers with ideas, but there is no final Independent writing. Rather, students complete three sentence frames: “Bees help people because___.”; “Bees help people, but___.”; and “Bees help people, so___.”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 29, students defend how immigrants enrich a community by writing a letter. Students brainstorm different ways immigrants enrich a community and share their ideas with a partner. Students state their opinion and share reasons to support them. Students draft a letter sharing their opinion about how immigrants enrich a community including their reasons.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 18, after reading the article “An Oasis on Wheels” by Kio Herrera, students design a way to get more nutritious foods to families and write a letter to their mayor to convince them to adopt their idea.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
Materials include a sufficient focus on the grammar and usage standards. Both the Literature and Science and Social Studies units include explicit instruction of grammar and usage standards and provide opportunities for students to practice and authentically apply their learning.
Materials include limited explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to use collective nouns (e.g., group). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, the teacher reminds students that collective nouns are used to describe a group of insects. As students research, they share the collective noun used to describe their group of insects and the teacher encourages them to use the collective noun in their writing.
Students have opportunities to form and use frequently occurring irregular plural nouns (e.g., feet, children, teeth, mice, fish). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 7, the teacher guides students to use words and phrases, and adjectives and adverbs that catch readers’ attention, as students write newspaper articles about what happened at Fenway Park.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, the teacher supports students with using words that “show” not tell, as students write their own mystery stories. The teacher tells students that “an irregular plural noun is a noun that does not become plural in the regular way (s or es).” The teacher displays four spelling patterns with rules. Students analyze a non-exemplar sentence and edit their own stories, looking for plural nouns that might use an irregular spelling.
Students have opportunities to use reflexive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 7, the teacher explains that reflexive pronouns are “special pronouns used when the object is the same as the subject” and provides students with a list of eight reflexive pronouns, such as “I— myself; he—himself; they—themselves.” After working with the teacher on analyzing and revising an exemplar sentence, students complete three sentence frames that contain reflexive pronouns. Students also must use reflexive pronouns when writing their responses to questions.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 9, students examine their writing for the use of reflexive pronouns and check to ensure they used the right reflexive pronouns.
Students have opportunities to form and use the past tense of frequently occurring irregular verbs (e.g., sat, hid, told). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, students write mystery stories that rely on the use of past tense verbs to explain events leading to the mystery itself.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 3, the teacher explains irregular past tense verbs and provides sets of two sentences, one with a present tense verb and one with a past tense verb. With a partner, students practice using go/went, came/come, leave/left, think/thought while discussing what they have learned about immigrants. Students independently write in response to the question, “Why is the United States called a ‘nation of immigrants’?” and use irregular verbs in their responses.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 20, the teacher picks “a focus based on class needs,” such as irregular verbs. Students write letters to a person they have interviewed. While the lesson does not include explicit instruction on irregular verbs, materials provide a Supplemental Language Lesson on irregular verbs in the Language Supports section.
Students have opportunities to use adjectives and adverbs, and choose between them depending on what is to be modified. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 20, the teacher explains that writers use adjectives and adverbs to make their writing more interesting. The teacher explains that students will revise their sentences to include adjectives. The teacher and students practice adding adverbs and adjectives to sample sentences. Students continue drafting their stories and focus on including details using adjectives and adverbs that describe a character’s actions, thoughts, and feelings.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, the teacher displays two pairs of sentences with and without adverbs and discusses how adverbs help the reader understand the character’s actions. Students add adverbs to their independent writing.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 3, students use adjectives to describe how characters may be feeling. Students complete the following sentence frames: “Sharon is ___, so ___. Andrew is___, so ___.”
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 7, students use adjectives and adverbs that best create attention and detail for a newspaper article they are writing.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 9, students elaborate on their previously completed description of how food travels and is digested. Students create a diagram and write a paragraph that uses adjectives and verbs to explain digestion.
Students have opportunities to produce, expand, and rearrange complete simple and compound sentences (e.g., The boy watched the movie; The little boy watched the movie; The action movie was watched by the little boy). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 6, the teacher explains that a complete sentence tells who or what does something and what they did. The teacher orally determines if the practice sentences are complete sentences using the think aloud strategy for two of them and has students help with the last two. During shared writing, partners turn fragments into complete sentences, orally and in writing. Students complete the Target Task sentences independently ensuring they are complete.
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 6, students learn how to use question words to expand their sentences, making the sentences longer and more interesting. The teacher models expanding a kernel sentence with the students, explaining to start with when, where, and why to expand sentences. During the shared writing activity, students practice expanding kernel sentences with a partner. Students independently complete the Target Task and include an expanded sentence in their response.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 5, the teacher models how to use subordinating conjunctions, such as before, after, when, and if, to make complex sentences that describe chronological order. Students work with partners to complete sentence frames that start with subordinating conjunctions. Then students independently complete one sentence frame and write their own second sentence with a subordinating conjunction. In Lesson 10, the teacher reviews this lesson and students complete the same routine. In Lesson 11, the teacher reviews and provides examples of subordinating conjunctions. During independent writing, students try to include subordinating conjunctions in their response to the Target Task.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 6, the teacher models how sentences can be combined to be more complex using the words because and he, instead of the name used in the first sentence. Students use sentence strips to practice and apply combining sentences about events/people from the text.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 8, the teacher displays simple sentences and students practice combining them into one complex sentence. The teacher encourages students to use transition words, such as first, also, another reason, and finally, to expand their sentences.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 12, the teacher reviews what a complete sentence is. The teacher orally models determining if a sentence is complete or not. The teacher and students practice creating complete sentences from fragments, ensuring the sentences include a capital letter at the beginning and punctuation at the end. Students work independently on the Target Task sentences. After students write their own simple sentences, they share the sentences with a partner.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, students learn how to write a topic sentence and expand the details about their insect using the because, but , so strategy. The teacher shows examples and non-examples of strong topic sentences and works with students to identify if a topic sentence is strong or not. Students work in partners to identify strong topic sentences and explain why the topic sentence is strong. Students work with a partner to write topic sentences that match their supporting details. As a support, the teacher can give students the Single Paragraph Outline to organize their ideas before writing. Students continue to expand their sentences on Day 4.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 11, the teacher models combining three sentences with a conjunction to make a complex sentence. Students work with partners to combine sets of three sentences with a conjunction to make complex sentences. Students independently combine three sentences with a conjunction to make a complex sentence.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 31, the teacher models revising sentences by adding subordinating conjunctions. Students work with partners to revise a sentence by adding a subordinating conjunction. Students revise their own writing by adding subordinating conjunctions. The informational writing rubric says students must use two or more complex sentences with subordinating conjunctions for full credit.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 7, the teacher models combining two sentences and expanding one sentence using the words when or where. Students expand two sentences using when, where, and why. Students apply are provided with sentences from the text and asked to combine.
Students have opportunities to capitalize holidays, product names, and geographic names. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 20, the teacher reviews rules of capitalization including capitalizing the first word of a sentence, proper nouns and names, most words in titles, and the pronoun I. Students practice revising provided sentences and edit their own writing for capitalization. This lesson and application opportunity aligns to Kindergarten and Grade 1 Language standards.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, the teacher tells students that “writers capitalize holidays, product names and geographic names” and reminds students to edit their work for this.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 29, the teacher tells students they need to capitalize holidays, product names, and geographic names. The teacher models by correcting two examples. Then students work with partners to edit their writing for capitalization, if needed. Students do not practice capitalizing sentences with holidays, product names, and geographic names and the writing task does not require students to include holidays, product names, or geographic names.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 31, the teacher explains that students should capitalize names of things, people, and places. The teacher models capitalizing parts of one sentence including a person’s name, product name, and geographic name. Students work with partners to revise sentences for capitalization. Students independently edit their own writing for capitalization. The informational writing rubric states students must use capitalization “skillfully” for full credit.
Students have opportunities to use commas in greetings and closings of letters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 15, students write a letter to Keena to describe what they think she should do next and why. The teacher models the start and end of a letter and the letter writing format required. The class completes the letter together. Then students write their own letters to Keena.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 20, the teacher picks “a focus based on class needs,” such as commas in letters. Students write letters to a person they have interviewed. The lesson does not include explicit instruction on using commas; comma usage is mentioned in the Language Supports section.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 18, students write letters to the mayor to find ways to get more nutritious food to the community using the letter format.
Students have opportunities to use an apostrophe to form contractions and frequently occurring possessives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 21, the teacher explains that an apostrophe is used to bring two small words together and to show ownership of something. The teacher shows examples of contractions and asks students to think of other examples. The teacher shows examples of possessives and asks students to think of examples. The teacher and students practice analyzing sentences and revising and editing them. Students work with a partner to add or fix apostrophes in their own written stories.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20, the teacher tells students that “writers use an apostrophe to form contractions;” however, the lesson does not include examples or guided practice activities for students prior to students editing their stories.
Students have opportunities to generalize learned spelling patterns when writing words (e.g., cage → badge; boy → boil). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 26, the teacher models using a word they already know how to spell to spell a new word with the same spelling pattern from their model story. For example, the teacher models how duck helps you spell struck, how most helps you spell post, and how raced helps you spell laced. Students practice orally in pairs. Individually students return to their stories and revise spelling for spelling patterns.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 20 teachers tell students to “generalize learned spelling patterns when writing words.” The lesson does not include examples and students do not have opportunities to practice generalizing learned spelling patterns to write words.
Students have opportunities to consult reference materials, including beginning dictionaries, as needed to check and correct spellings.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, students use a dictionary to look up the spelling of words. The teacher models looking up one word, mentions that a dictionary includes the part of speech and is in alphabetical order, and releases students to use the dictionary independently. The lesson does not include guided practice.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, students engage in research to learn about an insect. Students gather information from several nonfiction books and reference materials and record the information on their Insect Notetaker. The teacher can review how to locate credible sources of information on the internet if needed.
In Science Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 3, students learn about the text features of an encyclopedia in order to find new information. Students are introduced to what an encyclopedia is, the different text features they may see in an encyclopedia, and how and why encyclopedias are used. In Lesson 4, students use the encyclopedia to describe what happens when food is digested.
Students have opportunities to compare formal and informal uses of English.
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 21, during the first discussion of the year, the teacher leads students in a brief conversation about formal and informal discussions. The teacher explains that in the classroom, discussions are formal academic conversations in which they will use complete sentences without slang or abbreviations. The teacher gives students sample scenarios. Students label the scenarios as informal or formal and explain their reasoning.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 13, the teacher models asking questions, “‘Mike knew that Kate was always trying to figure out why something happened the way it did. He was usually just trying to make things happen.’ What does this mean? Why did the author include these two sentences?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 14, the teacher facilitates a student discussion using the Discussion Teacher Tool. The teacher leads students in a brief conversation about formal and informal discussions. The teacher explains that in the classroom, discussions are formal academic conversations in which they will use complete sentences without slang or abbreviations. The teacher gives students sample scenarios. Students label the scenarios as informal or formal and explain their reasoning.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.
Instructional materials identify key vocabulary words and list them at the beginning of each unit and lesson throughout the year. Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II, and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section, provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units. During lessons, the teacher decides how to introduce vocabulary words and how students will engage with the words. Resources for vocabulary are primarily text-based, with few opportunities for students to interact with the words while speaking, listening, and writing. The assessment of student grade level acquisition of vocabulary is not consistent, often reflects a few words, and does not align with the requirements of grade-level standards.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Instructional components for vocabulary are found in the Teacher Tool Section. Vocabulary words address text-dependent Tier I, II, and III words used in lessons.
The teacher can download a vocabulary package for each unit that contains a handout with all the vocabulary words, a space to label the part of speech, a space to draw a picture of the word, and a space to write a definition of the word. The vocabulary package also includes word cards that contain the word, definition, part of speech, and a picture. Within each unit, a list of vocabulary words is located at the top of the lesson map. When the teacher accesses lesson plans, the vocabulary list along with definitions is visible. Additional vocabulary support within lessons includes word banks, sentence frames, word maps, games, and a visual glossary. Teacher Tools guidance suggests vocabulary instruction occurs daily for ten minutes or less using a routine that becomes familiar to students; however, the structure for these opportunities is rarely included in daily lessons. The end-of-unit vocabulary assessment provides student choice in determining which two words from the unit list to illustrate and define. Few vocabulary words are used across multiple units and lessons.
Vocabulary is sometimes repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 14, while reading Mufaro’s Beautiful Daughters: An African Tale by John Steptoe, the teacher introduces the word deceitful. The word is explicitly taught but it is not included in questions or sample responses. Lesson guidance states the teacher can prompt students to use the word deceitful in responses instead of the word mean. Of the 29 vocabulary words listed for the unit, nine repeated in multiple lessons, and five of the words are included in the unit assessment.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 2, while reading Freckle Juice by Judy Blue, two vocabulary words, allowance and desperate are listed, but only desperate is taught and used in multiple contexts. There is no evidence of the word allowance being taught or applied within tasks.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 3, while reading A Forest Habitat (Introducing Habitats) by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay, students discuss the word carnivore. The term is included in questions and is repeated in Lesson 7 during the sample response. Carnivore also appears at the end of the unit assessment. Of the 27 vocabulary words listed, 18 repeated in multiple lessons.
In Science and Social Studies Science Unit 4, Lesson 3, while reading How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo and Jacqueline Tourville, the teacher defines the term autism. Students learn about famous figures who may have autism when watching two videos.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 4, while reading The Gods and Goddesses of Olympus by Aliki, there are two vocabulary words, headstrong and moody. Although the teacher can download the vocabulary package to use with students, the lesson does not include any options for how to embed vocabulary learning within the lesson.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 6, while reading Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules, the teacher introduces academic, high-frequency words such as “defend” using text evidence to support meaning. Defend is used when asking students what they know about superheroes and what superheroes do.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 2, while reading F is for Fenway: America’s Oldest Major League Ballpark by Jerry Pallotta, there are many baseball terms introduced including bullpen, dugout, home run, infield, and rivalry. Although these are tier 3 words, students need to understand in order to comprehend the story and meet the objective of the lesson: Describe three baseball-specific words and why they are important to the game by determining the meaning of the words in a story and explaining how they are connected.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Materials are organized around themes and topics. Units focus on literature or science and social studies content. Some units focus on themes, such as being a good friend and a good person in a community, rather than building knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts, and the questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions. Text-based questions and tasks integrate knowledge and ideas over the course of the year using single and multiple texts. Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks. Over the course of the year, students learn how to use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose explanatory and opinion writing. Writing tasks build in complexity over the school year from simple sentence responses to multiple sentences used to support an opinion, inform or explain an event or topic. Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade-level standards. Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction, and students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and task. The materials provide ample questions for teachers to ask students and students to answer. Many standards are repeated throughout multiple units across the year. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit. Instructional materials provide 123 days of Literature lesson plans and 131 days of Science and Social Studies lesson plans. The sample schedule requires up to three hours daily to implement all the recommended components. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors.
Materials do not include a foundational skills component.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
Materials are organized around themes and topics. Units focus on literature or science and social studies content. Some units focus on themes, such as being a good friend and a good person in a community, rather than building knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. Units organized around a topic provide multiple texts connected to the topic and allow a variety of opportunities for students to engage through repeated lessons, class discussions, writing prompts, word cards, and the final assessment. Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts, and the questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions. Materials support students’ development of the analysis of knowledge and ideas. Text-based questions and tasks integrate knowledge and ideas over the course of the year using single and multiple texts. Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Most tasks allow students to demonstrate acquired knowledge of the unit topic. Each unit has at least one culminating task involving drawing and writing. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks. Over the course of the year, students learn how to use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose explanatory and opinion writing. Writing tasks build in complexity over the school year from simple sentence responses to multiple sentences used to support an opinion, inform or explain an event or topic. Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade level standards. Students are encouraged to use specific examples in research projects. Shared research projects are included to help develop students’ research skills. Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meets the criteria of Indicator 2a.
Materials are organized around themes and topics. Units focus on literature or science and social studies content. Some units focus on themes, such as being a good friend and a good person in a community, rather than building knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. Units organized around a topic provide multiple texts connected to the topic and allow a variety of opportunities for students to engage through repeated lessons, class discussions, writing prompts, word cards and the final assessment. According to the authors, the purpose of the curriculum is to build knowledge of the world and achieve grade level language arts and speaking and listening standards.
Some texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read/listen and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, texts are organized around the topic of “Awesome Insects.” The materials state, “Students learn about insects and their impact on the natural world by asking and answering questions about informational texts in order to become inquisitive, active readers.”
Throughout the unit, students read/ listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the topic. Texts include: Insect Bodies by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian (Lessons 1–2); Insect Life Cycles by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian (Lessons 4–6); Ants by Melissa Stewart (Lessons 8–9); Bees by Laura Marsh (Lessons 11–13); Insectlopedia—“The Caterpillar,” “The Dragonfly,” and the “Army Ants” by Douglas Florian (Lessons 15–16); Helpful and Harmful Insects by Bobbie Kalman and Molly Aloian (Lessons 17–19).
The Unit Prep section includes the Essential Question, “What impact do insects have on the natural world?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
“Explain ways that insects are helpful: pollination; produce products like honey, beeswax, and silk; eat harmful insects, dead or dying animals, or animal droppings.
Explain ways that insects are harmful: destroy crops, trees, wooden buildings, and clothes; carry diseases, bite, or sting.
Identify the distinguishing characteristics of insects: exoskeleton; six legs; three body parts: head, thorax, and abdomen; compound eyes; two antennae; mouthparts on their head; wings are not an insect characteristic; only some insects have wings.
Explain insect life cycles: complete and incomplete.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, texts are organized around the topic of “People Who Changed the World.” The materials state, “In this unit, students improve reading and writing standards and skills as they explore biographies of famous leaders and change agents.”
Throughout the unit, students read/ listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the topic. Texts include: Honda: The Boy who Dreamed of Cars by Mark Weston (Lessons 1–2); How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo and Jacqueline Tourville (Lesson 3); Sharuko: Peruvian Archeologist by Monica Brown (Lessons 4–5); Buzzing with Questions: The Inquisitive Mind of Charles Henry Turner by Janice N. Harrington (Lessons 7– 8); Queen of Physics: How Wu Chien Shiung Helped Unlock the Secrets of the Atom by Teresa Robeson (Lessons 9–10); Mama Miti: Wangari Maathai and the Trees of Kenya by Donna Jo Napoli and Kadir Nelson (Lesson 12); The Watcher: Jane Goodall’s Life with the Chimps by Jeanne Winter (Lesson 13); Mario and the Hole in the Sky by Elizabeth Rusch and Teresa Martinz (Lessons 14–15); Farmer Will Allen and the Growing Table by Jacqueline Briggs Martin and Eric-Shabazz Larkin (Lesson 17); Sonia Sotomayer: A Judge Grows in the Bronx by Jonah Winter (Lessons 19–22); Barack Obama: Son of Promise, Child of Hope by Nikki Grimes (Lessons 24–25); Malala Yousafzai: Warrior with Words by Karen Leggett Abouraya (Lesson 27); Malala Yousafzai: Champion for Education by Jodie Shepherd (Lesson 28).
The Unit Prep section includes the following Essential Questions: “What does it take to change the world? Why is it important to speak up for those without a voice? Why is it important to ask questions about the world around you?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
“A biography is a text about a person’s life that is written by someone else. An autobiography is a text about a person’s life written by the person.
You can change the world by inventing or discovering something new.
You can change the world by making the world and environment better for everyone.
You can change the world by standing up for what you believe in and fighting for what others think is impossible.”
Some texts in a unit are connected by a theme, as opposed to building knowledge on a topic. Examples include:
In Literature Unit 3, texts are organized around the theme of “Belongings and Friendship: Pinky and Rex.” The materials state, “By connecting with the characters from the easily relatable series PInky and Rex, students learn that it’s okay to be different and consider what it means to be a good friend.”
Throughout the unit, students read/ listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the theme. Texts include: Pinky and Rex by James Howe (Lessons 1–4); Pinky and Rex and the Bully by James Howe (Lessons 6–9); Pinky and Rex and the Spelling Bee by James Howe (Lessons 11–13); Pinky and Rex and the School Play by James Howe (Lessons 15–17).
The Unit Prep section includes the following Essential Questions: “What does it mean to be best friends? Why is it important to stand up for yourself and what you believe?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
Pinky and Rex is a chapter book series. Books in a series often build on each other. We learn more about the characters and their feelings, motivations, traits, and relationships in each book. They might change or develop as you read more books in a series.
Having a best friend helps you face life’s challenges. Best friends support and help each other, no matter the situation. Sometimes best friends are similar, but they are often different from each other and that is okay. Best friends can get into arguments, but they always apologize and forgive each other.
It is important to stand up for yourself and what you believe because everyone is different. Being different is okay! When you stand up for yourself, kyou feel powerful and confident. And more importantly, you feel happy because you get to be yourself.
In Literature Unit 5, texts are organized around the theme of “Learning From Mistakes: Keena Ford.” The materials state, “In this unit students explore the concepts of honesty, forgiveness, and friendship by reading Freckle Juice and Keena Ford and the Second-Grade Mix Up.”
Throughout the unit, students read/ listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the theme. Texts include: Freckle Juice by Judy Blume (Lessons 1–7, 25) and Keena Ford by Melissa Thomson (Lessons 8–25).
The Unit Prep section includes the following Essential Questions: “How do other people influence the decisions you make in your life? What does it mean to forgive someone? How can we learn from our mistakes? What does it mean to be honest? Why is it important to show honesty in our everyday lives?”
The Unit Prep section does not include a Content Knowledge and Connections component.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.
Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts. Questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions. With prompting and support, questions require students to recall information, compare and contrast, retell story events, identify key details, formulate opinions, and make inferences.
For most texts (read-aloud texts K–1 and anchor texts Grade 2), students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 3, students describe what happens at the ball and how it changes Cinderella and the stepsisters’ lives by describing how the characters respond to events. The class creates an anchor chart on the major events of the general Cinderella story to use throughout the unit to support comparing and contrasting different versions of the story.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 12, students read Chapter 1 of Zapato Power: Freddy Ramos Springs Into Action by Jacqueline Jules. Afterward, students use key details to explain how Freddy Ramos shows confidence and to describe how he responds to major events and challenges.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 1, students ask and answer questions about the forest, desert, rainforest, and water habitats using key details from multiple texts.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 3, students read How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo and Jacqueline Tourville. Students describe what Temple invented, why she invented it, and how it impacted others.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lessons 5–6, students read First Human Body Encyclopedia (author not cited). Students retell the sequence of events in the process of digestion.
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 2, students identify and explain how the author uses descriptive language in Chapter 2 of the book, Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules. Students explain what the following phrases mean and why the author included them: "my feet took off like jet wheels on a runway", "one blink later", "Zoom! Zoom! Zapato!"
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 4, students read the book Freckle Juice by Judy Blume. Students describe Andrew’s feelings about Sharon and use evidence from the text to make inferences that show one character’s perspective of another character.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 18, students read Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly. Students analyze the phrase Mama tells Alfredo: “think of yourself as a little bird who does not need much to eat or drink to keep flying north. Just like the swallows we see every spring.” Students explain what they think the phrase means and why they think Mama said this to Alfredo.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 16, students read the poems “Inchworm” and “Hornet” from Insectlopedia by Douglas Florian. Students answer the following questions: “How does the author use the shape of the poem to describe an inchworm?” and “How does the author use rhyming words in the poem?”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2c.
Materials support students’ development of the analysis of knowledge and ideas. Text-based questions and tasks integrate knowledge and ideas over the course of the year using single and multiple texts. Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 16, students read The Talking Eggs by Robert D. San Souci and use the illustrations to infer character traits. Students respond to questions such as, “How does the illustration on pages 5–6 show the character traits of the mother, sister, and Blanche?” and “‘But the woman had been nothing but kind to her; so she just went on lighting the fire.’ How does the author use this sentence and the events inside the old lady’s cabin to show what Blanche is like?” Students write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “Describe Blanche. How is she different from her mother and sister?”
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 6, students begin reading Pinky and Rex and the Bully by James Howe and continue to examine the topic of personal identity, friendship and belonging. Students use information from the text to respond to questions such as, “What does the description ‘his cheeks were fever-hot’ show about Pinky and how he is feeling?”; “Why is he feeling that way?”; and “Why does he think that Pinky is a sissy?”
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 4, students read Chapter 2 of Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly and describes “how characters in a story respond to major events and challenges.” Students respond to questions such as, “What do you notice about how I read Kate and Mike’s dialogue? What does it reveal about them?” and “Why does Mike think the batboy could be a suspect? Explain.” Students write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “How do Kate and Mike respond to the news that Big D’s bat has been stolen? Do they have the same reaction?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 6, students continue reading First Human Body Encyclopedia (author not cited). Students describe what happens after food leaves the stomach. Students respond to a series of questions, including “The author says undigested leftovers end up in the large intestine. What does it mean if something is undigested?” and “How does the diagram contribute to our understanding of the digestive system?”, before discussing and responding to the Target Task.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 7, students continue reading Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce and analyze this statement: “The ancient Greeks had busy lives. They enjoyed their family and their friends.” Afterwards, students respond to the questions, “What reasons does the author give to support this idea?” and “Why do the reasons support the author’s point?”
Most sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 21, students use the various Cinderella texts from diverse cultures read throughout the unit to analyze what lessons can be learned from the characters and how the lessons translate into our lives. Students respond to questions such as, “Think about the character traits of each of the ‘Cinderellas.’ What do they have in common? What lessons did they learn?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 14, students use their learning from A Desert Habitat and A Forest Habitat (Introducing Habitats) both by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay to compare and contrast how plants and animals use their surroundings to meet their needs. Students discuss questions such as, “How do plants get what they need to survive in a desert? In a forest? How is this different?” and “How do plants and animals get water in a desert? In a forest? How is this different? How do you know? Can you think of an example?” After the class discussion, students write in response to the following Target Task: “Compare and contrast how plants and animals in a desert habitat depend on their surroundings to meet their needs in comparison with how animals and plants in a forest habitat meet their needs. Why are they different?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 26, students use a Venn diagram to compare and contrast the information presented in Barack Obama: Son of Promise, Child of Hope by Nikki Grimes and Barack Obama by Caroline Crosson Gilpin. After completing a close read of portions of both texts, students discuss their responses to text-based questions such as, “How is the author telling the details?” and “What does the author want us to think or know?” Students must “include both factual and inferential (author’s purpose) similarities and differences” in their Venn diagrams.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 17, the teacher selects one of the following essential questions for students to debate and defend: “What makes the human body amazing?”; “Why is the digestive system important?”; or “How does food keep our body healthy?” Students draw upon their learning from the texts about the human body they read throughout the unit and “gather two to three specific details they can use to support their thinking.”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit’s topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2d.
Materials provide several culminating tasks that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills and allow students to demonstrate acquired knowledge of the unit topic. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks. Students gain knowledge from the unit to create artifacts of their learning. Students engage in class and peer discussions around texts and cite specific facts from texts to support their ideas. Teachers monitor student learning throughout the year using the Discussion Recording form, Academic Discourse Rubric, Editing Checklist, Graphic Organizers, and Writing Rubrics. The culminating tasks are used as formative assessments before the Unit Summative Assessment.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 13, students compare and contrast two versions of Cinderella by describing how the setting impacts the characters and plot of a story. Students analyze different lessons learned in each story. In pairs, students recount key events from the stories, Yeh-Shen: A Cinderella Story by Ai-Ling Louie and The Egyptian Cinderella by Shirley Climo. Students plot each story using a graphic organizer independently while working with partners or in small groups. Students use their plot charts to explain what is similar and different between the two Cinderella plots and lessons learned, citing universal lessons and how the stories are impacted by diverse cultures.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 19, students demonstrate their knowledge of friendship traits from reading the Pinky and Rex series. Students debate their responses to the Essential Questions in small groups using evidence from two or more of the unit texts. Students use the Character Trait Wall, Character Map as well as vocabulary from the unit in their discussion. Teachers assess students by collecting individual writing.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 7, the culminating task centers around learning from mistakes using Freckle Juice by Judy Blume. The class creates a plot map with students working in pairs to identify and interpret key details. A class discussion focuses on the role of peer pressure and self-confidence with who you are as students discuss the influence of others in their life. Students use reflexive pronouns in their discussion and use conjunctions when writing to explain why something is important or to connect details.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, students design a zoo habitat for a given animal using knowledge of plant and animal relationships and habitat features from the unit.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 18, students choose one person they have read about and write an informational report describing how that person made the world a better place. Students state a claim and include specific details from the text to support their claim. Students engage in a class discussion to brainstorm how the people they have read about in the unit worked to make the world and environment better. Students share their writing with a partner explaining what they admire about their selected person and what part of the person’s story inspired them most.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 9, students spend two days synthesizing what they have learned about digestion. Students write a paragraph and create a poster to illustrate what happens when they eat a food of their choice. Students use elements of scientific texts such as; headings, labels, captions and a diagram of how food moves. This task is completed again in Lesson 12 with the urinary system.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.
Over the course of the year, writing expectations strategically build across the course of the year, with an emphasis on making sure students can meet the demands of the standard by the end of the year. The unit Focus Areas build strategically over the course of the year, and students progress through the stages of writing - brainstorming, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing if applicable. Each project includes focused lessons that include research-based, well-designed models, protocols, and resources for teachers. Instructional materials are aligned to research-based writing strategies, as noted in the Writing Teacher Tool, and the enhanced Lesson Plans ensure that students receive explicit and sequenced instruction to aid in developing grade-level writing techniques.
Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include 16 lessons on opinion writing, 20 lessons on informative writing, and 8 lessons on narrative writing.
In Literature Unit 1, students explore various versions of the Cinderella story, provide short answer responses to questions such as, “How did the Queen know that Cinderella had a good character?”, and provide character summaries or retell events. Students learn the pattern and characteristics of Cinderella stories and write their own. The unit writing focus centers on identifying complete sentences, turning fragments into complete sentences and writing a Cinderella story with a beginning, middle and end.
In Literature Unit 3, students explore the theme of friendship, what a good friend is, and the importance of standing up for yourself and what you believe using the reading series Pinky and Rex by James Howe. The unit writing focuses on brainstorming opinions and developing details to support the opinions. Students practice using conjunctions and create complex sentences.
In Literature Unit 6, during narrative writing, students write a mystery that introduces characters, setting and the problem. Students use descriptive language, and include a cliff-hanger to build suspense. Throughout this unit, students practice using a variety of sentence types to improve their topic and conclusion statements.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, while following the steps in the writing process, students focus on expanding simple sentences using the “because, but, so” strategy. This strategy helps students write with specific details. Students work on writing a topic sentence and using facts and definitions to develop their points.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, during informative writing, students explore report writing. Students learn how to state a claim and provide supporting details. Students also conduct research to write a report.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, during informative writing, students write biographies and informational texts. Students also conduct research to create a presentation.
Instructional materials include some well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples inclu
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 18, materials provide the objective, Target Task, and Sample Response. The lesson includes slides and handouts for the lesson. Additional supports include a graphic organizer to help students structure their thoughts prior to writing.
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, materials provide the Objective, Target Task, and Sample Response. The lesson spans five days and each day includes Teaching Point and Engaging with the Teaching Point sections. Lessons also include the Sentence Level Feedback and Support (K–5th Grade), the Narrative Writing Feedback and Support (K–5th Grade), and the Editing Checklist (K–2) for teacher use during progress monitoring.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 3, the objective is to “explain which of the following images are insects by using organizing categories to defend claims or opinions about a content-related topic. Slides and handouts are included for use throughout the lesson. A sample response is included for modeling and discussion.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 6, materials provide the Objective, Target Task, and Sample Response. The lesson includes Building Background and Engagement, Shared Writing, and Building Deeper Meaning sections. During Shared Writing, the teacher models writing three sentences but the sample response contains multiple paragraphs. The teacher models writing an opening sentence but not a closing sentence, yet students are required to write a closing sentence. The lesson includes the Sentence-Level Feedback and Support (K–5th Grade), the Paragraph-Level Feedback and Support (K–5th Grade), and the Editing Checklist (K–2) for teacher use during progress monitoring.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students’ knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2f.
Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade level standards. Students are encouraged to use specific examples in research projects. Shared research projects are included to help develop students’ research skills. Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies, Unit 2, Lesson 22, the teacher prepares students to research an insect they have not learned about yet. The teacher models how to select a topic, review resources, write a topic sentence, and use facts and definitions to support a point.
In Science and Social Studies, Unit 6, Lesson 6, the teacher prepares students to write a biography of a Greek God. The teacher using information from notes to write a topic sentence and use key details to support a topic sentence.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 1, teachers use Key Questions to highlight important information throughout the reading of the book, What is Culture by Bobbie Kolman. The lesson plan includes example answers, and suggested supports to help students with comprehension.
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 16, the Teacher Guide includes a video related to Anansi stories and additional questions for discussion before students research. Materials provide a list of character traits and sentence frames for students who struggle to describe Anansi the Spider independently.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, the Teacher Guide includes sample writing, book lists for research, and opportunities for enrichment. Materials also include additional supports for students who are struggling, including but not limited to, additional lesson ideas for teachers.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 28, materials provide guidance on teaching students about reliable sources. Materials also include a Cultural Research Project Notetaker to support students with collecting information for the research project.
Materials include shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 7, students use the information gathered in Lessons 2–5 to write an informational report that explains how plants and animals depend on their surroundings and other living things to meet their needs in the forest. Students include multiple details from A Forest Habit (Introducing Habitats) by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macauley.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, students research and write a report on an insect. Students use unit texts, internet sources, and a graphic organizer to conduct their research. In the research report, students include researched facts that answer four questions and a text feature, such as an illustration with labels.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 5 , Lesson 16, students write a paragraph about “a nutritious and delicious breakfast, lunch, or dinner” by researching what is and is not a healthy food, and what constitutes a healthy diet. In addition to texts read, videos watched on healthy foods and how to read the nutrition labels on food, students use the internet and websites, newspapers, and food boxes to learn more about what healthy food choices are and the role different foods have when creating a healthy plate.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction, and students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and task. Students have opportunities in each lesson to use a partner Turn and Talk and engage in open whole group discussions that involve the diverse views of all students. The materials provide ample questions for teachers to ask students and students to answer. Many standards are repeated throughout multiple units across the year. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit. Instructional materials provide 154 days of Literature lesson plans and 180 days of Science and Social Studies lesson plans. The sample schedule requires up to three hours daily to implement all the recommended components. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors. The Building Deeper Meaning section in the lesson suggests allotting 25 minutes to introduce the lesson, model expectations, discuss content, and write about the Target Task. Materials do not include a foundational skills component.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.
Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction. Students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and tasks. Students have opportunities in each lesson to use a partner Turn and Talk and engage in open whole group discussions that involve the diverse views of all students. The materials provide ample questions for teachers to ask students and students to answer. Many standards are repeated throughout multiple units across the year. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit.
Over the course of each unit, instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 2, when introducing the text, Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules, the teacher explains descriptive language: “Tell students that authors use powerful language in their writing to make us feel like we are in the text with the characters. This is called ‘descriptive language.’ Say that descriptive language helps readers better visualize and understand what is happening in the story. It makes you feel like you are right there.” The lesson includes Additional Supports for students who need more guidance for descriptive language such as an anchor chart . The teacher points out that the author uses a lot of comparisons in the book: “Explain that today, they will pay close attention to the descriptive language that Jaqueline Jones, the author, uses when describing Freddie’s new shoes. Tell students that she uses a lot of comparisons. Remind students that a comparison is when you compare what you see to something else. (e.g., it was as cold as ice!).” The teacher discusses the descriptive language and comparisons the author is using.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 4, the teacher explains text features and discusses how the bold words emphasize the important vocabulary in the paragraphs of A Forest Habitat (Introducing Habitats) by Bobbie Kalman and Kelley Macaulay. The lesson lists RI.2.2 as a standard addressed in the lesson; however, the teacher does not provide instruction on how to identify the main topic of the text or the focus of specific paragraphs in the text.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 2, after reading the Target Task for Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osbourne and Natalie Pope Boyce, the teacher explains how the author “has several key points in their text” and tells students that they need to support their points with reasons when writing their response. Teacher guidance includes, “Give the following example: You might say: ‘Julia is a top-notch soccer player.’That is the key point. To support that point, you might say: ‘She was the highest-scoring player on the team last season’; ‘She was selected to be on the traveling team’; ‘She practices every night after school and on weekends.’”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 7, core standards listed for the lesson include RL.2.3 and RL.2.7. The majority of the Key Questions students respond to during the reading of Cendrillon: A Caribbean Cinderella by Robert D. San Souci align to these standards. For example, “Describe the narrator. How did she meet Cendrillon?”; “Why did the stepmother and stepsister ‘peer crossly’ at Cendrillon and her godmother?”; “How do Cendrillon and the narrator feel after the party?”; and “Why do they both feel that way?” The Target Task also aligns to these standards: “The morning after the ball, Cendrillon says, ‘You gave me this night. That is enough.’ Why does she say that? What can we learn from her?”
In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 8, students continue their reading of Ancient Greece and the Olympics: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne and Natalie Pope Boyce. During the Target Task, students write in response to the following prompt: “What reasons does the author give to support the idea that at the center of Greek life was a love of learning, fun, and beauty? How do the reasons support the author’s point?” This task aligns to RI.2.8, one of the core standards listed for the lesson.
Over the course of each unit, assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments are conducted in the same format for every unit. Assessments include a vocabulary section and a writing prompt. The writing prompt does not include an associated reading passage, so students must rely on knowledge gained throughout unit lessons to answer the writing prompt.
In Literature Unit 2, Content Assessment, during the Content Knowledge portion of the assessment, students respond to a writing prompt: “In this unit you read multiple Spider stories. What can these folktales teach us about being a good person? Pick one lesson you learned from a story in the unit. Explain how you learned the lesson using key details in the text. Your answer should include, A lesson from the unit, Details about how the lesson was shown in the story, At least one character trait describing Spider, and Complete, detailed sentences. You may use the text and your class notes to help you answer the question.” The assessment item lists RL.2.2, RL.2.3, RL.2.5, W.2.1, L.2.1, and L.2.2 as standards assessed.
In Literature Unit 6, Content Assessment, during the Content Knowledge portion of the assessment, students write in response to the following prompt: “Using what you read in this unit, respond to the following statement: Your friend read The Fenway Foul-up and said Mike and Kate make a bad team because they don’t think the same way. Do you agree or disagree? Explain why.” The assessment item lists RL.2.2, RL.2.3, RL.2.6, W.2.1, L.2.1, L.2.2 as standards assessed.
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, students read Yeh-Shen: A Cinderella Story from China by Ai-Ling Louie, and determine the lesson the story teaches. In Literature Unit 2, students read various folktales from The Adventures of Spider: West African Folktales by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst and determine the central messages of the folktales. In Literature Unit 5, students read Keena Ford(series) by Melissa Thomson and retell the key events of the story then describe the lesson of the story by writing advice in a letter to the main character. In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 17, Ballpark Mysteries #1: The Fenway Foul-Up by David A. Kelly, students write about why the main characters are considered “MVPs” by determining the central message or lesson of the story. This content aligns to RL.2.2.
In Literature Unit 4, students read Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Takes Off by Jacqueline Jules and discuss descriptive language used in the story. In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 10, students Close read a sentence from Keena Ford(series) by Melissa Thomson and discuss what the sentence shows about the main character. Students also explain why characters said specific phrases. In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 15, students read poems "The Caterpillar," "The Dragonfly," and "The Army Ants" from the book Insectlopedia by Douglas Florian and discuss the meaning of words, how the author uses description, and how the author uses rhyme. While materials provide opportunities for students to describe how words and phrases supply meaning in a story, poem, or song, materials miss opportunities for students to describe how words and phrases supply rhythm, as required in RL.2.4.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 2, students write about why the author wrote the text and how they know. In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, students identify reasons an author wrote a text and what the author wanted people to know. In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, students identify reasons an author wrote a biography and why the author thought the person’s life was important to learn about. In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, students describe two Ancient Greek gods and determine key details the author wants the reader to know about the gods. This content aligns to RI.2.6.
In Science and Social Studies Unit 3, students describe how reasons support the main ideas of immigration and challenges immigrants have. In Science and Social Studies Unit 4, students describe how reasons support the explanation of how people are changemakers in the world . In Science and Social Studies Unit 6, students explain the topics of Ancient Greek and how reasons support the topics. This content aligns to RI.2.8.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.
Instructional materials provide 154 days of Literature lesson plans and 180 days of Science and Social Studies lesson plans. The sample schedule requires up to three hours daily to implement all the recommended components. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors. The Building Deeper Meaning section in the lesson suggests allotting 15 minutes to introduce the lesson, model expectations, discuss content, and write about the Target Task. Materials do not include a foundational skills component. The implementation schedule allots 60 minutes for Literature instruction, 60 minutes for Science and Social Studies instruction, and 25–30 minutes for independent reading. Scheduling an additional 25–30-minute block for foundational skills instruction may not be feasible.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
A daily reading lesson consists of Building Background and Engagement (7 minutes) during which the teacher introduces the book and/or topic; Engaging with the Text (25 minutes) during which the teacher reads the text and asks discussion questions; and Building Deeper Meaning (15 minutes) during which the teacher explains the lesson and Target Task. During the Building Deeper Meaning component of the lesson, students respond to the Target Task, often during a discussion and through writing.
Writing and reading instruction occur during the Literature and Science and Social Studies blocks. Time for writing varies depending on the demands of the task.
Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Pacing Guide states, “While our 2nd Grade curriculum does provide instruction in fluency, it does not include a comprehensive foundational skills block. To ensure students master all grade-level standards, you will need to implement a highly-rated structured phonics program alongside these units.”
The Pacing Guide includes a sample schedule that allots a 60-minute block for Literature instruction, a 60-minute block for Science and Social Studies instruction, a 25–30 minute block for Independent Reading, and a 25–30-minute block for Foundational Skills. The Teacher Tools section suggests teachers create additional time for reading structures such as small group, or partner reading, for students to receive differentiated instruction, as well as for teachers to assess fluency; however, this time is not allocated in the daily lesson plans. Given the time demands allotted for the Literature and Independent Reading blocks, an additional 60-minute block for science and social studies instruction, as well as a 25–30-minute block for foundational skills instruction, implementation is not feasible, particularly if there are separate science and social studies curricula for the teacher to enact.
The Pacing Guide states, “Our 2nd Grade Literature units span 154 days and our 2nd Grade Science and Social Studies units span 178 days. We intentionally did not account for all 180 school days to allow teachers to fit in additional review or extension, teacher-created assessments, and school-based events. Each unit includes a specific number of lessons, including writing and discussion lessons, and a day for assessment.”
Materials include six Literature Units with 138 lessons taught over 154 days and six Science and Social Studies Units with 153 lessons taught over 180 days. Literature units include approximately 30 days for other school or classroom needs, while Science and Social Studies units do not include any non-instructional days.
Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found.
Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level in both regular content and assessments. There are various types of assessments in the program, including unit content assessments, formative and summative assessments. While an answer key is provided for all assessments, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key. The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. Materials include general support throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students. Still, the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson, as the variation of the structure in lessons is limited. The program does not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. The materials also include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson for teacher use. Materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities. The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
Thematerials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. In each unit, links in the Enhanced Lesson Plan allow teachers to download student materials for use in the lessons. These materials include a vocabulary package and the option to turn the Key Questions and Target Task into student handouts. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes specific suggestions for how to incorporate materials within the lesson plan, including explanations for use; directions for how to frame and utilize supports; and reminders, sentence stems, and key places to stop when Engaging with the text. Each lesson contains one or more objectives for students to meet and a list of core and supporting Common Core Standards covered in the lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Unit Summary with a list of Core Materials and Supporting materials as well as how the texts were selected. A Unit Launch is included in each unit to help the teacher understand the unit. It includes five steps including, Introduction, Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Key Writing Standards.
The lessons offer guidance for teachers to support all students by Building Background and Engagement, and guidance is available consistently around the Target Tasks across the grade level. An example of additional support is when the materials offer sentence stems and scaffolded questions for teachers to utilize when Engaging with the Text and Building Deeper Meaning.
Each Unit Summary includes a comprehensive list of the vocabulary for the unit Teachers also have access to the vocabulary package that includes a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Each lesson also includes Google Slides that contain the lesson’s vocabulary word and an image that corresponds.
Each non-writing lesson includes a Building Background and Engagement section that sets the purpose for reading and provides necessary background knowledge. This section also helps activate prior knowledge of the text and may ask students to turn and talk to discuss what they read previously.
In the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, the goal is to “build [teachers] understanding of how students might experience the unit text(s) based on these interconnected aspects of text complexity.” For example, Unit 3 includes the What Makes the Text Complex and Your Students and These Texts subsections, with guiding questions for teachers to reflect on the text and their students.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 2, there is a section called Notes to indicate to teachers that this is the first interaction with Cinderella and it is imperative that students know and can retell the classic version of the story. This section also suggests that teachers create several anchor charts throughout the unit to capture students’ emerging content such as the traits of a fairytale, the lessons learned at the end of each Cinderella story, and different character traits.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 12, the teacher introduces the term refugee as the book describes Sudan and the war that forced many boys to leave their homes and families. The lesson provides three resources to help the teacher have a better understanding of this topic to support students as well as information to indicate that the text includes violence and the loss of family, which may be a sensitive issue for students.
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 11, materials include additional questions to support students in comprehending the text in addition to the Key Questions such as, “Look at the illustration on page 22. What does it help you to understand about Keena and her dad’s relationship?”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 15, materials provide a graphic organizer that could be considered for students to help them record their thinking with evidence.
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. Each unit provides a Unit Prep section that includes some additional contextual background, but it does not provide support in teaching grade level concepts within the lesson plans. Explanations are included in the Teacher Tools of different aspects of the curriculum and teaching techniques or different strategies related to knowledge demands of each unit, but they are not lesson- or text-specific. The explanations of the concepts are specific to the approaches taken by the materials and do not provide any additional opportunity for teachers to expand their understanding of a concept within the curriculum. Occasionally, teachers are directed to do their own research to understand information for a unit.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, there are multiple sections that present specific information on how to prepare the unit, internalize a unit, and understand the different components of an ELA lesson.
In Teacher Tools, Writing, there are specific full-length explanations of Learning to Write and Writing to Learn.
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, there are explanations of Intellectually Preparing a Unit, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Scaffolds for English Learners, Engineering Texts, Oral Language Protocols, and Using Graphic Organizers as Scaffolds.
In Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, there are explanations of Categories to Progress Monitor, Types of Assessment for Progress Monitoring including Formative Assessments and Summative Assessments.
In the Vocabulary section of the Teacher Tools, there is an explanation of how the vocabulary is built into the units and an explanation of how students build vocabulary through interacting with Tier II and Tier III words. There is then an in-depth explanation of how to teach the words within the text. There are no specific examples or modeling provided. There is further instruction for teachers in how to teach vocabulary through both an implicit and explicit approach with guidelines and strategies but no specific examples or modeling.
In Teacher Tools, Providing Access to Complex Texts section, there are detailed explanations of what makes a text complex and how to provide access and support for more complex texts being used by students.
In Teacher Tools, Routines for Active Reading, there is an explanation of what active reading is and then more in-depth explanations of various forms of active reading, including Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading, and Independent Reading.
In the Unit Launch section of the curriculum, the teacher is provided with an opportunity to internalize the essential questions of the unit. The teacher is provided with opportunities to explore the questions as well as sample answers to the questions. In the section “Considering Who and Where You Are,” the teacher is given an opportunity to reflect on biases or gaps in knowledge that might impact the teaching of the unit.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Launch for each unit contains intellectual prep for the teacher, providing materials for the teacher to be prepared to teach the unit. The unit launch includes “a series of short video, targeted readings, and opportunities for action planning.” The Unit Launch for each of the units consists of four sections: Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Working Toward Mastery. The online platform includes places for responses to be recorded and a Unit Launch Note Taker (K-2nd grade) is also included. For example, in Unit 1: Cinderella Around the World, Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, helps the teacher to examine the texts and understand the complexity and examine how the texts may or may not connect to your students’ lives. The launch then examines the Unit Essential Content, focusing on the Essential Questions and potential answers to these questions by students. The Launch also includes Key Reading Standards, with questions to build meaning of the text; however, these focus on helping students to understand the texts and tasks of the unit, not learning beyond the focus of this unit. Working Towards Mastery focuses on preparing the teacher for what students need to know and be able to do in order to answer the reflection questions. No additional resources were provided to allow teachers to improve their own knowledge on the subject.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson. In addition, the materials include a Standards Map for 2nd Grade English Language Arts which identifies each core and supporting standard in each Literature and Science and Social Studies unit.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
For each unit, the Lesson Map table includes a list of addressed standards. At the beginning of each unit in the Unit Prep, there is also a section titled Common Core Standards, where the core and supporting standards are listed.
The end of each lesson in every unit includes a list of Common Core Standards and Supporting Standards, which are defined as “Standards that are practiced daily but are not priority standards for the unit.” All are hyperlinked to a pop-up window with the full text of the standard. For example, in Literature Unit 1, Lesson 7, materials list Common Core Standards L.2.6, RL.2.3, and RL.2.7 as the core standards and L.2.1.f, L.2.4.a, RL.2.10, SL.2.1, and SL.2.2 as the supporting standards
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Launch section of the curriculum includes an explanation for the key reading standards. The teacher works through unpacking the key understandings, which are linked to specific standards, by answering questions concerning the understanding and how it will help the student with the texts and tasks in the unit. Questions include: “What concrete information will students need to know in order to access this key understanding? How will this key understanding help students understand the texts and tasks of the unit?”. Once the teacher enters a response, they can compare their response to the publisher’s answer. In the next step, “Working Toward Mastery” the teacher reflects on the skills and knowledge that students must develop to successfully answer the target tasks. Each step in this internalization of the unit has publisher exemplar responses to help deepen understanding.
The Unit Launch for each unit includes a section entitled Unit Essential Content. Guidance notes, “The goal of this section is for you to review and fully understand the key content knowledge of a unit prior to teaching. Doing this work prior to teaching the unit will help you endure that students internalize the key content knowledge by the end of the unit.”
In the Key Reading Standards section, guidance notes a “few core reading standards” have been selected and “broken down into Key Understandings. The Key Understandings are what students need to know and understand about the core standards in order to build meaning. These Key Understandings should never be taught in isolation; they are meant to be used to deepen understanding of the texts and content.”
The Unit Prep identifies writing focus areas, speaking and listening focus areas, and reading focus areas when appropriate. At times, materials tag specific standards to the areas.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. Materials provide limited information to guide teachers relating to the content covered in each unit or lesson. Materials do not include information on how parents or caregivers can help students succeed in the program.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program and include an annotated bibliography that references the research-based strategies. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. Materials provide a concise explanation of each ELA component and explain how the program is designed to teach the components to accomplish the stated goals.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, materials provide an explanation of how the materials approach each ELA component:
In Language and Grammar, the explanation states: “Language and writing instruction are embedded within all Fishtank ELA units from K-12. Language instruction is a powerful tool to help students understand the decisions authors make and how they impact the effect their writing has on readers. Learning grammar and mechanics is about studying the intentional decisions authors make, noticing the power of different punctuation, sentence structures, and craft choices, and then trying out those strategies in their own writing. When learning different grammatical structures students zoom in on sentences to notice the connection between mechanics, craft, style, and meaning. Language instruction isn’t separate from reading instruction, because the connection between language and the author’s craft is integral. Because language instruction is so deeply connected to reading instruction, it should not be taught in isolation. And as far back as 1936, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) found that formal teaching of grammar and mechanics had little effect on students’ writing and even had deleterious effects on student writing when it displaced writing time. Instead, language instruction should be organically embedded into all aspects of reading and writing so that students can authentically grapple with and understand how different structures impact meaning.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, Interactive Read Aloud, the explanation states: “We use the word interactive because kids should be doing some of the heavy comprehension work during the reading aloud, the teacher shouldn’t be doing all the work.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, the explanation states that the goal of the curriculum is to build independent and strategic learners. The approach is explained as providing students with multiple opportunities to interact with a wide variety of texts independently with the goal of having students read the core texts independently with little support.
In Vocabulary, the explanation states: “Vocabulary development is intentionally built within all Fishtank ELA units. Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic. Throughout the unit, students have multiple opportunities to engage with words orally or in writing. Depending on the word, vocabulary words are taught both directly or indirectly. Fishtank ELA does not rely on a single vocabulary instructional method, rather instruction happens strategically within units so that students learn vocabulary indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines.”
In Writing, the explanation states: “Fishtank ELA includes opportunities for students to both learn to write and write to learn. Students will be immersed in reading, writing, discourse, and idea generation cycles in each unit. There is no separate writing block and no separate writing curriculum; all writing instruction is embedded directly into lessons and units. Through embedded on-demand and process-writing assignments, students build powerful, evidence-based arguments and develop their voice in a variety of genres. Because students need solid knowledge and understanding of a subject matter to write, all Fishtank ELA writing assignments are connected to a core text, or ask students to write about content knowledge from the unit, ensuring that all students have equal access to the assignment.”
In the Fishtank guiding principles, materials provide the following information: “In Literature units from Kindergarten through 8th grade, students read texts that explore themes applicable to their lives while also building knowledge of historical events and time periods. Most of the literature units focus on developing identity, diversity, justice, and activism, which are key components of Learning for Justice’s Social Justice Standards. The content of all of our K–8 units, both Literature and Science & Social Studies, aim to provide students with windows and mirrors to ensure students see their own identities, experiences, and motivations in texts (mirrors), alongside texts that allow students to gain insight and build empathy for the identities, experiences, and motivations of others (windows) (Style, 1996). And, wherever possible our units aim to engage students in discussions of current events. We also frequently update our units to incorporate articles and discussion topics that reflect current issues in the world around them.”
The Fishtank guiding principles also reference the following: “Rather than organizing lessons around specific skills (e.g. how to find the main idea) and teaching these skills in isolation, we organize our curriculum around carefully-selected texts that will engage students and facilitate deep thinking and strategy development. The text, and the demands of the text, drive the focus of a particular unit or lesson. Text-dependent questions in each lesson are sequenced in order to build a deeper understanding of the key ideas and themes presented by the text. Units across the curriculum require students to read a combination of longer texts to build stamina and engage in discussions about the full text, as well as close readings of specific passages or excerpts. Text-dependent questions and close readings push students to pay close attention to the author's craft and text structure, word choice, and challenging vocabulary and syntax (Coleman and Pimentel, 2012). All grade-level Common Core Standards are carefully woven into the units and lessons, introduced and reinforced through text-dependent questions and close reading moments, and work in service of deep understanding of the text.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Writing, bibliographic references to multiple sources used in the development of their program include:
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin
Writing for Understanding: Using Backwards design to help all students write effectively by J. Hawkins, E. Ginty, K. LeClaire Kurzman, D. Leddy, and J. Miller
The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades by Judith C. Hochman and Natalie Wexler
In Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, bibliographic references to multiple research sources in the development of their program include:
Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Prompting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students by Z. Hammond
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by J. Zwiers and M. Crawford
Common Core Standards in Diverse Classrooms: Essential Practices for Developing Academic Language and Disciplinary Literacy by J. Zwiers, S. O’Hara, and R. Pritchard
In Teacher Tools, Text Selection, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
“Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy,” by Gloria Ladson-Billings
Why Knowledge Matters by E.D. Hirsch, Jr.
Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework and Historically Responsive Literary, Gholdy Muhammad, and “Curriculum as Window and Mirror” by Emily Style
In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines: Close Reading, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading by K. Beers and R.E. Probst
Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading by D. Fischer and N. Frey
Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--and Life by C. Lehman and K. Roberts
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners: Scaffolds for English Learners, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include “Essential Actions: A Handbook for Implementing WIDA’s Framework for English Language Development Standards” by Margo Gottlieb
In Teacher Tools, Vocabulary, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction by Isabel Beck and Common Core Appendix A.
In Teacher Tools, the explanations of the Match Fishtank approach to writing, vocabulary development, and language and grammar instruction are followed by “resources referenced in the development of” each section.
Additional reference sections include Qualitative Complexity of Fiction Texts, Providing Supports for Text Complexity, How Texts are Selected in the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Close Reading, and Foundational Skills.
The Foundational Skills section and its subsections entitled Teaching Reading Fluency and Assessing Reading Fluency, as well as the subsections of Academic Discourse entitled Types of Academic Discourse and Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Subsections of Supporting English Learners entitled Scaffolds for English Learners and Oral Language Protocols, and the subsection of Progress Monitoring and Assessment entitled Formative Assessments include embedded footnotes with references.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit plan contains a list of the texts being read throughout the unit with hyperlinks to the texts (either for reading or for purchase).
Each lesson folder contains all the handouts students will need for the lesson.
For example, for Unit 1, lesson 1, the lesson folder contains separate student handouts for the key questions and target task.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standard and practices for the grade level. Each section of the assessment lists the standards addressed, and each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards each assessment question addresses. The materials provide an answer key for each assessment in the program with the corresponding assessed standards. While an answer key is provided, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. In addition, the materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standard and practices for the grade level. Each section of the assessment lists the standards addressed, and each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards each assessment question addresses.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains an assessment that addresses the content covered during the unit. Each section of the assessment, such as Vocabulary or Writing about Reading, identifies the standards assessed. The answer key document includes a table that contains an answer key and the standards that each assessment question addresses.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials include limited opportunities to determine students’ learning and insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key that is provided. Most support occurs through a handout that contains protocols and probing questions for students.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and some guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains one formal assessment that covers the content from the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, the Progress Monitoring and Assessments section includes a data analysis protocol. Materials provide probing questions for teachers to use to assist in discussing the assessment. Categories covered in this protocol include Unit Preparation, Lesson Preparation, Lesson Execution, and Progress Monitoring.
In the Teacher Tools, the Summative Assessments section contains the Data Meeting Protocol Guide, which includes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a Data Meeting. The guide has two parts. Part 1 explains how to use data to identify strengths and growth areas; Part 2 explains how to use data to reflect and plan next steps.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and limited suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Formative Assessments section provides information regarding the use of formative assessments to progress monitor the different components of ELA instruction. This section includes:
the use of Key Questions to check for understanding;
Target Tasks to monitor reading comprehension, content knowledge, writing or oral language development;
Exit Tickets to quickly check student understanding; and
writing assignments to monitor writing, content knowledge and vocabulary, or reading comprehension.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. Each unit contains both a Content Assessment that “pushes students to synthesize unit content knowledge, vocabulary, and/or the unit essential questions in writing” and a Cold Read Assessment, which also assesses unit standards. Educators can give one or both of the assessments. In addition, students write daily about the text they read or listen to. Materials provide a rubric to assess formal writing. The rubric addresses the grade-level standards aligned to the formal writing task, including standards that address language, conventions, and elaboration.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 3, the Content Assessment first requires students to answer multiple choice questions about the unit vocabulary. Then students answer the question, “What does it mean to be best friends?” after reading multiple books in the Pinky and Rex series. Student writing must include 1–2 examples from the text, details about how they learned from the characters, and complete detailed sentences. The Cold Read Assessment asks questions about a text such as, “How is Rex Feeling? How do you know?” and “How does Pinky respond to Rex? Why does he respond that way?’
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, the Content Assessment first has students answer questions about the unit vocabulary words. Then, students respond to the prompt, “Your friend says it doesn’t matter what you eat. How would you respond?” in writing. The answer must include two reasons why they agree or disagree and two examples from the unit, including unit vocabulary. The Cold Read Assessment asks text-dependent questions on a novel text such as, “How does the large image of the child help a reader understand muscles?” and “Why are your muscles important? Name at least two examples?”
Examples of formative assessments include:
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 9, students respond to the writing prompt, “How did Pinky change? Why? What lesson did he learn?”
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 10, students respond to the prompt, “Are Kate and Mike right to suspect Grandpa Kevin? Do they have enough evidence? Or are they unfairly jumping to conclusions about him?”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 19, students “identify the different ways insects can be both helpful and harmful. Pick one reason insects are helpful and explain why.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 15, students write in response to the prompt, “Mario says, ‘We saved our planet once. We can do it again.’ Explain what he means and why it is important.”
Examples of summative assessments include:
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 21, students complete the Cold Read Assessment (RL.2.3, RL.2.5, RL.2.6, RL.2.7).
In Literature Unit 5, Lesson 26, students complete the Content Assessment (RL.2.2, RL.2.3, RL.2.4, RL.2.5, RL.2.10, W.2.1, L.2.1, L.2.2, L.2.4, L.2.5, L.2.6).
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 32, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (RI.2.2, RI.2.3, RI.2.4, RI.2.19, W.2.1, L.2.1, L.2.2, L.2.4, L.2.5, L.2.6).
In Science/Social Studies Unit 6, Lesson 23, students complete the Cold Read Assessment (RI.2.2, RI.2.6, RI.2.8, RI.2.9).
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. The assessments are not designed so students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. To make the tests more accessible, such as text-to-speech or increasing the font size, teachers must download and edit the assessments.
Materials do not offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments are digital and housed on the website. Although assessments could be altered before printing, it would involve reformatting the answers.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
Materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. While the materials include suggestions on how materials can be scaffolded for multi-lingual learners or for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, these suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of these scaffolds to the teacher. The materials do include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. Throughout the program, there is limited variation in structure. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students, but the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson. The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. Lesson plans contain Supporting All Students boxes, which include Additional Supports, Language Supports, Building Background Knowledge and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and Opportunities for Enrichment strategies designed to help students meet or exceed grade-level standards when working with grade-level content; however, teachers will need to determine which supports to utilize, specifically for special populations.
Materials provide some strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 16, the teacher asks four text-dependent questions while students engage in the text. Each question includes a Language Support and/or an Additional Support to help students answer the question. The material states that teachers should “Use the guidance from the Using Key Questions (K–5) Teacher Tool to determine which structure to use and to determine which supports to use to help all students, or subsets of students access the task and text.” Each support states that it can be used with Multi-Lingual Learners or students with language differences, but materials do not provide additional information to support the teacher with making decisions.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 10, students respond to the writing prompt, “Based on what you have learned about ants, would an ant survive in a rainforest? Argue why or why not.” The Supporting All Students Box includes a Language Support suggestion and an Additional Support suggestion. For both of these supports, the guidance within the question mark icon indicates that “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task.” Directions suggest that teachers see Supporting All Students with Fishtank ELA for more guidance, but materials do not provide specifics on how to help students in special populations.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 17, materials provide an anchor chart that the teacher and/or students can fill in while reading the text to suppport students with the Target Task. This Additional Support “can be used with Multi-Lingual Learners or students with learning differences;” however, the supports do not provide additional guidance for teachers to make decisions.
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials include many opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, there are limited opportunities for students to engage with literacy concepts beyond the core materials. The number of lessons that contain an “Opportunities for Enrichment” section is limited. Some of the lessons provide specific scaffolds intended to enhance lessons by providing additional depth, though many add activities for students, such as reading an extra text or portion of a text or completing an additional assignment for the text.
Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, eight of twenty-eight lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.
In Literature Unit 2, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:
In Lesson 1, enrichment opportunities include: “If there is time, consider showing students this video of Denzel Washington narrating a Spider story. Part of this video describes how enslaved people from Ghana brought the stories with them to the Caribbean. It also is a model for how to read these folktales with expression.”
In Lesson 2, enrichment opportunities include: “Ask students to reread sections of the text as a storyteller would, with expression. Other students can give them feedback.”
In Lesson 3, enrichment opportunities include: “Encourage students to retell the story as a storyteller would (with lots of expression!).”
In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include: “Encourage students to do research on the rainy season in West Africa. What is it like for the people who live there?”
In Lesson 5, enrichment opportunities include, “Encourage students to retell the story as a storyteller would (with lots of expression!).”
In Lesson 6, enrichment opportunities include, “Give additional question words to students who are easily expanding their sentences.”
In Lesson 7, enrichment opportunities include, “Challenge students to gather enough evidence to argue the opposite opinion of what they originally thought.”
In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include, “Encourage students to retell the story as a storyteller would (with lots of expression!)”
In Lesson 9, enrichment opportunities include, “Teach students the word “humble.” Say: “At the end of the story, Spider ‘burst out laughing at himself.’ He did not get upset or annoyed when he realized he was tricked. Did you expect that? Do you think we should add “humble” as one of Spider’s character traits? Why or why not?”
In Lesson 10, enrichment opportunities include, “Encourage students to retell the story as a storyteller would (with lots of expression!)”
In Lesson 11, enrichment opportunities include, “Ask students to imagine the scene between Aso and Spider when she realizes what he had done. What would she have said? Done? Felt? Write a scene between the husband and wife.”
In Lesson 13, enrichment opportunities include: “Give additional question words to students who are easily expanding their sentences.”
In Lesson 14, enrichment opportunities include: “If no students are defending the idea that this is *not* like what he has done before, push them to think about other times that he has been proven wrong. What did he do? How did he respond? Specifically, push them to think of his reactions in How Spider Helped a Fisherman and Why Spiders Live in Dark Corners.”
In Lesson 16, enrichment opportunities include:
“Rewatch this video (0:17–15:00) about Anansi/Spider that tells how enslaved people in Jamaica told Anansi stories, as a ‘little guy’ fighting back against the big tiger.”
“Push students to think about Anansi/Spider as a symbol of resistance. Ask: How did Anansi represent power and strength to the enslaved people of Jamaica? Does this change your thinking about him?”
“The second half of the video shows the story How Spider Got a Bald Head, which might be fun for students to watch after reading the story.”
In Literature Unit 6, twelve of twenty-one lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, twelve of twenty-seven lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, the unit includes 11 enrichment opportunities across 24 lessons:
In Lesson 1, enrichment opportunities include:
“Consider opening the class by having students go on an “insect hunt” to look for/notice insects around them in the natural world. What did they find? What did they notice?”
“Ask students to look for insects at recess or at home, and see if they notice any of the characteristics they learned about today.”
In Lesson 2, enrichment opportunities include:
“When reviewing insect characteristics, make it fun! Ask students to pick a side and defend their decision. Feign ignorance when you say that insects have eight legs.”
“Give students an illustration of an insect with blank labels for each body part. Ask them to fill in the insect body parts and explain why each part is important.”
In Lesson 3, enrichment opportunities include:
“If students finish early with their partners, have them draw their own "insect" and give it all the body parts that classifies something as an insect. This will be a warm-up for their project later in the unit.”
“If students finish early, ask them to draw an insect and label its body parts that matches their paragraph.”
In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include, “Show students the following video to help them visualize what the stages in a complete life cycle look like: Monarch Butterfly Metamorphosis time-lapse FYV 1080 HD by FrontYardVideo (YouTube).”
In Lesson 5, enrichment opportunities include, “If you would like students to read more about the insect life cycle and you have access to Reading A-Z, you can print out this book and use it with the class: Insect Life Cycle by Chuck Garofano.”
In Lesson 6, enrichment opportunities include, “Show students the following video of a cicada molting its exoskeleton during its incomplete life cycle: "Cicada Molting" (YouTube).
In Lesson 7, enrichment opportunities include, “Do a nature walk with students and ask them if they can find insects in each part of its life cycle. Ask: “How do you know?”
In Lesson 8 and 9, enrichment opportunities include:
“If you have access to Reading A-Z, we suggest students read this as a supplementary text: Awesome Ants by Rus Buyok.”
“If students finish their writing early, encourage them to add an illustration with text features to support their writing.”
In Lesson 10, enrichment opportunities include, “Encourage students to use all three conjunctions in their writing: ‘because,’ ‘but,’ and ‘so.’”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide minimal variety in how students demonstrate understanding. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, and opportunities include whole group discussion, writing, and partner work. Students often have multiple opportunities to engage their learning within the same lesson. The materials include few opportunities for multi-modal learning, with the majority of the lessons involving listening to a text, discussing a text, and writing in response to the text. Materials provide opportunities for students to self-assess their writing and participation in discussions, but materials lack opportunities for students to monitor their learning over time.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a limited variety of formats and methods. Examples include but are not limited to the following:
In Science/Social Studies Unit 1, Lesson 19, students begin the lesson brainstorming and discussing how plants and animals depend on each other for survival in the water. After discussing, students share their answers in writing. The teacher encourages students to also include an illustration that supports a reader's understanding of the key ideas in the writing.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, Lesson 8, students “describe what life was like on Angel Island.” They use the videos “Discovering Angel Island: The Story Behind the Poems” by KQED and “Angel Island Immigration Station Tour- AIISF” by JJMediaLabs. In addition, the materials include additional websites for students to explore and additional videos to show to help students make sense of life on Angel Island.
Students have some opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 21, students use what they learned throughout the unit to answer the writing prompt, “Imagine all the insects in the world suddenly disappeared. Would this be a good thing or a bad thing? Defend your answer with two or three reasons why.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, Lesson 26, students “Compare and contrast Barack Obama: Son of Promise, Child of Hope and Barack Obama by identifying and explaining points presented by two texts on the same topic.” Students work with a partner to complete a Venn diagram. Then each partnership shares out.
Materials leverage the use of included formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 20, students argue whether or not kids and robots can be best friends using details about the Pinky and Rex relationship from the entire Pinky and Rex series. First, students watch a video called “Meet Moxie- See How Moxie Works' ' by Embodied, Inc. Then, students discuss whether they think a kid and a robot can be friends. Lastly, students use evidence to write an opinion piece based on the book, the video, and the discussion.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, Lesson 15, students learn how to read food labels. In this lesson, students receive the article, “Read the Label Youth Outreach Materials” by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. In addition, the materials include images of food labels, websites such as “How to Read a Food Label” by Healthy Kids Association, and videos such as “Making Healthy Choices Using the Nutrition Fact Label” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 13, students discuss different versions of Cinderella. After the discussion, students self-assess their participation using the Academic Discourse Rubric. Then, the teacher compares their assessment of the student with the student’s own assessment.
In Literature Unit 2, Lesson 8, students retell “How a Spider Got a Bald Head” by Joyce Cooper Arkhurst. First, the teacher models with a nonexample of a retell and prompts students to explain what they notice about the retell and what is missing. Then, students work with a partner to retell. While partner A retells the text, partner B listens and provides feedback. The lesson plan also includes an Editing Checklist for students to use to assess their own retell once they write it at the end of the lesson.
Materials rarely provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 4, Lesson 20, students engage in a discussion about the text Zapato Power: Freddie Ramos Springs into Action by Jacequleine Jules. At the end of the discussion, the teacher encourages students to self-assess their participation using the Academic Discourse Rubric; however, materials do not provide guidance on helping students move their own learning based on the self-assessment.
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
While materials provide opportunities for grouping students, the groupings do not vary in type and groupings take place in the same part of each lesson. Students do not have multiple opportunities to work in varied groups or different types of groupings. Materials do not provide specific guidance that explains how teachers should form groups or how teachers should incorporate protocols when grouping students. Materials also miss opportunities to provide suggestions for additional times when groupings could be used.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide limited types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, Lesson 13, students use the Turn and Talk protocol to recount key events in the different versions of Cinderella.
In Literature Unit 3, Lesson 10, students use the partner or small group protocol to have students retell and chart the key events of Pinky and Rex.
In Literature Unit 6, Lesson 12, students discuss the key events of the text so far in partners or small groups.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, Lesson 5, students complete a diagram and use the Academic Discourse Protocol while working with a partner or small group to summarize the insect life cycle.
In Science/Social Studies, Unit 5, Lesson 8, students complete a quick review with a partner and respond to the prompt, “What happens when food leaves your stomach? Include at least the next three steps.”
Materials provide some guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, the Providing Support During Discourse section provides some guidance for the teacher “to ensure that all students are able to effectively participate in academic discourse, provide the whole-class, small-groups, or individual students with the following supports—Strategically group students. If your class has a large number of English learners, group students who speak the same home language together. Allow them to complete the assignment in either English or in their own home language.”
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Preparing for Academic Discourse section poses this question for teachers to consider: “What vocabulary do students need to know and understand? Do I need to plan for Turn and Talks or small-group work to help students process the content?”
In the Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Types of Academic Discourse section includes information regarding the types of academic discourse provided in Fishtank ELA lessons: whole-class discussions, small-group discourse, and partner discourse. “The type of discourse students participate in will depend on the task and the goals of the lesson. There are many situations where all three types, or a combination of them, would be appropriate to use; however, each one brings some of its own unique values or benefits. When intellectually preparing to teach a lesson, you should think about where in the lesson you can include opportunities for different types of academic discourse.”
Materials provide protocols for Whole Class Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the Protocol for Fishbowl includes the following guidance: “The inner circle discusses a question while the outer circle observes. Note: This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task—often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback. Otherwise, it can be challenging to keep students in the outer circle engaged. Rotate so that each group of students engages in discussion and observation.”
Materials provide protocols for Small Group Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the protocol for Numbered Heads Together includes the following guidance: “Numbered Heads Together holds all members of a group accountable for participating and clarifying understanding of a particular question or topic. Numbered Heads Together can be used with any discussion prompt, however, questions with multiple answers or nuanced answers lead to a more engaging discussion.”
Materials provide protocols for Partner Conversation and “provide all students with a scaffolded and structured opportunity to formulate and share ideas. Partner conversations are low-risk and allow all students a chance to participate in the lesson at the same time.”
While materials provide this guidance in Teacher Support, the lesson plans do not adequately reference this guidance.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide some language supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English; however, materials miss opportunities to label specific protocols for these learners. The included language supports provide support with meaning, context, and understanding. These supports are also helpful to students who speak, write, and/or speak languages other than English with accessing the text or responding to the text. Materials provide additional supports in Teacher Tools that provide general guidance in preparing lessons for multilingual learners; however, they are not lesson specific, are broad in application, and would require teachers to prepare materials for specific lessons within the curriculum.
Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Supporting All Students, the materials provide a question mark next to Language Support, which indicates the following: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text and the task. See the Supporting English Learners Teacher Tool for additional guidance.”
In Literature Unit 3, materials include one lesson that specifically provides support for multilingual learners. In Lesson 4, Language Supports guidance states, “Explain to any multilingual learners that his ‘face fell’ does not mean what it says. It is an expression called an ‘idiom.’”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 2, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners.
In Science/Social Studies Unit 5, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners.
In Teacher Tools, materials include multiple folders providing guidance for teaching multilingual learners. They include guidance on providing scaffolds that are divided into areas of light support and heavier support. Suggestions include providing illustrations, images, photos, providing videos, films, or audio to support a lesson, using real-life or physical objects, text clues, various graphic scaffolds, and interactive scaffolds, including pairing and working with the student’s home language, and increasing supplemental texts and noticing cognates. These are explained and provided as general guidelines and are not lesson specific.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide suggestions on preparing lessons with multilingual learners in mind, including unpacking the units and texts with a look to analyzing language demands, knowing the language and content goals of the unit, planning for assessment and mastery, and taking ownership of teaching the unit with multilingual learners in mind.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on Engineering the Text that provides guidance on how to physically alter a text to make it more accessible to multilingual learners, including adding questions, proving genre tips, defining vocabulary, explaining key background knowledge, adding illustrations and headings, and including stop and jot questions.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on using oral language supports with multilingual learners. These include the use of various groupings to assist with comprehension and expressing ideas.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide teachers with general scaffolds for multilingual learners. These include:
In the Sensory scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Light EL Support and Heavier EL support. For example, in illustrations, images, and photos light supports suggested are: “Add illustrations to literature texts that do not include illustrations. Illustrations could be used to break up long sections of text or to clarify tricky plot events.” Heavier supports include: “Strategically engineer the text to include illustrations that align with specific features of text complexity. Multiple illustrations could be added to make the text easier to digest. (For example, when reading the Brer Rabbit folktales about the well, include an illustration of a well.)
In Interactive Scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Pairs, Small Groups, Discussion, Cooperative Structures, and Home Language. For example, in Home Language, materials state: “For lighter EL support: Have students use translanguaging by using some words and phrases from their home language when discussing or writing about content. For heavier EL support: Have students have entire conversations in their home language or have students write answers in their home language. Provide additional instruction on a particular concept or idea in students’ home language. Provide students with texts and problems written in their home language. Have students write an answer in their home language. Then have students transfer their answers to English.”
In Additional Supports, materials provide the teacher with suggestions for “Supplemental Text” support and “Noticing Cognates.” In the “Noticing Cognates” support, materials provide the following: “For lighter EL support: Teach students strategies for identifying cognates and have students self-identify and interpret examples of cognates in texts and tasks. For heavier EL support: Before reading a text, find examples of cognates and have students break them down. Focus on the meaning and intonation of the words. Teach students Greek and Latin roots that are cognates in English and Spanish. Have students create cognate reference guides.”
In Oral Language Protocols, materials provide the teacher with protocols for the following: Turn and Talk, Think-Pair Share, Write-Pair Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share Revised, Partner A Partner B. An example of the “Think-Pair-Share Revised protocol states: “Students are given a chance to refine their thinking and ideas based on their partner’s ideas and discussion. The teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer. Students pair up. Students take turns sharing their answers. Students revise their original theories or ideas.”
In Engineering Texts, materials provide the teacher with a three-step guide to support planning. The explanation includes, “When you engineer a text, you add text supports to ensure all students have access. This does not mean changing the text or lowering the rigor of the task. An engineered text anticipates possible student misconceptions, gives vocabulary cues, provides additional background knowledge, scaffolds questions, and creates opportunities for discussion.”
In Graphic Organizer, for multilingual learner support, materials provide the teacher with “suggestions on how to adjust the organizers to provide light or heavy EL support.” Some examples include:
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide light EL support:
Provide blank templates for students to use when reading a text, brainstorming, or solving problems.
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide heavy EL support:
Provide students with partially filled-out graphic organizers.
Provide guidance on where in the text, resources, or problem students can find a particular answer. (For example, if students are looking to describe a character, provide specific paragraph numbers where students can find key evidence.)
Have students work in partners using an oral language protocol.
If applicable, allow students to complete the graphic organizer in their home language.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts. The publishers state in the overview that they “seek to create curricular materials that center students, reflect multiple perspectives and experiences, and empower students to think critically about the world they live in.” The texts hold true to that standard as they contain characters from across a broad spectrum of society.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, students read multiple versions of the fairy tale Cinderella, “challenging them to think about how the culture, or setting, of the story influences the plot, and expanding the setting and characters.” The Unit Summary notes, “This unit builds on the exposure to new cultures students received in 1st grade and provides an opportunity for students to explore the idea that even though cultures may appear to be different, there are many things embedded within the unique characteristics of different cultures that make them similar.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 3, “students explore immigation by reading a series of narrative nonfiction and fiction texts that highlight the experiences of early and recent immigrants.”
“In the first bend of the unit, students are pushed to notice and think about the different reasons people choose to leave their homes and settle in a new community or country. They will also learn about—historically and in the present day—who is allowed to come to the United States and wrestle with whether or not the system is fair.”
“In the second bend, students will be pushed to think about the different memories, cultural traits, goods, ideas, languages, and skills that individuals and families bring with them when they move to a new place and how these characteristics enrich the community. “
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Literature Unit 1, students read The Rough-Face Girl by Rafe Martin. This version of Cinderella comes from Algonquin Indian folklore and features the title character who is scarred from working by the fire.
In Literature Unit 3, students read Pinky and Rex by James Howe. The unit summary notes, “Through connecting with Pinky and Rex, students will learn that it is okay to be different and to be proud of who they are, no matter what others may think. Students will also learn about what it truly means to be a good friend and how friends can support and stick up for one another in a variety of ways. They will also see that it is okay for boys and girls to be friends, even best friends.”
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, students read How to Build a Hug: Temple Grandin and Her Amazing Squeeze Machine by Amy Guglielmo. This story tells the inspirational story of an individual with autism and the invention she created.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Science/Social Studies Unit 4, students explore people who changed the world. “In this biography-based unit, second graders explore biographies of changemakers around the world.” In the first section of the unit, students research and learn about inventors. In the second section of the unit, students research and learn about individuals who have made changes that impacted the world and environment positively. In the third section of the unit, students study people who have changed the world by standing up for what they believe in. Texts in this unit include Sonia Sotomayor: A Judge Grows in the Bronx by Jonah Winter. This story tells the story of Sonia Sotomayor, the first Latino to be nominated to the US Supreme Court, whose childhood story includes poverty and prejudice.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The Teacher Tools provide some suggestions that scaffolds can be provided for students in their home language and that student conversations can be held in their home language. These suggestions are very general and leave the implementation and development of the specific scaffolds to the teacher. Materials include suggestions that teachers should consider students’ backgrounds when preparing a lesson, but materials do not provide specifics on how this should be done. The lesson plans include some scaffolds for multilingual learners but do not specifically address ways to use the home language to support learners that are lesson-specific. The Teacher Support section includes general guidance for supporting multilingual learners that relates to leveraging students’ home language through the use of translanguaging strategies.
Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, materials include a suggestion that when possible, teachers should show video adaptations of text in either English or the student’s native language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, when discussing creating graphs and charts to aid students in comprehending the text, materials include a provision to create the aids in the student’s home language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, Interactive Scaffolds, materials include provisions for incorporating the use of the student’s home language in discussions. Levels of support for students vary from translating phrases or words to allowing students to have complete conversations in their home language.
In Teacher Tools, the Planning for English Learners section provides teachers with a step-by-step guide of questions to intellectually prepare the unit. In Step One, the teacher unpacks the unit texts and tasks. Directions state, “Teachers should analyze the text, materials, vocabulary, unit focus areas, and lessons to determine the language demands of the unit. Questions include: What makes the text and tasks linguistically complex? What key vocabulary do students need to know and understand to engage with discipline-specific knowledge? What key language use(s) are targeted in the unit? How are students developing their understanding and production of all the key uses of language? (recount, explain, argue, discuss)” In Step Two, the teacher sets a vision for mastery. Directions state, “Teachers should articulate the language and content goals of the unit. What are the driving language demands of the unit? What language should you see and hear from students as they engage in meaning-making? Based on the language demands of the unit, what are the overall language goals for the unit? What are the content goals for the unit? What should students know and understand about reading, writing, and language? What should students know and understand about the themes/subjects of the unit?” In Step Three, teachers plan for assessment and mastery. In Step Four, teachers take ownership.
In Teacher Tools, English Learners, the Engineering Texts support provides teachers with a sample text. The example includes the following statements: “Let’s look at a before and after from a 5th-grade assignment from Science and Social Studies Unit 4: Exploring Mars, Lesson 19. In this lesson, students are reading a NASA press release for the first time. Here’s the original text, without text engineering, a press release from NASA: Mars Rovers Advance Understanding of the Red Planet As you can see, the text is complex for many reasons: Students may not be familiar with what a press release is, and the formal language used in a press release. Students may not have a strong grasp on knowledge from the unit so far, making it hard for them to understand key ideas from the press release. Students may not have a strong understanding of domain-specific vocabulary. Now, take a look at our Engineered Text Sample. This sample includes our meta-analysis of the purpose of each addition.”
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, the materials include general guidance to use translanguaging strategies. Students can annotate and take notes in their home language and research in their home language.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials include a support section in Teacher Tools that provides teachers with suggestions and methods for preparing lessons for multilingual learners. Materials provide multiple suggestions on how the lessons can be scaffolded for multilingual learners. These suggestions are general in nature and are not lesson-specific, leaving any scaffolding for lessons to be developed by the teacher. The Teacher Tool for Planning for English Learners provides further guidance that tells teachers to consider any connection between a lesson and students’ cultural backgrounds but the resource does not provide any specific guidance on how this should be done. Teachers must investigate and implement strategies on their own. Individual lessons include very limited scaffolding for multilingual learners, and none include connections to linguistics, culture, or conventions used in learning ELA. Suggested scaffolds include audio or visual representations of the text when available.
Materials make limited connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make limited connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Scaffolds for English Learners, the Additional Scaffolds section includes guidance on noticing cognates. Supports range from identifying and interpreting examples of cognates, teaching Greek and Latin roots, and creating cognate reference guides.
Materials include limited teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, during Step Four: Take Ownership of Planning for English Learners, guidance advises teachers to plan how they will consider students’ backgrounds when teaching a text. Suggestions include considering if connections can be made to students’ cultural traditions and considering what sociocultural context is relevant to the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two includes planning for how students’ backgrounds will connect to the lesson, including planning for any language demands that will need to be met.
Materials include limited equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two states, “Ensure accessibility: What supports will students with higher language proficiency need to access and understand the content? What scaffolds (sensory, graphic, or interactive) are needed?” The guidance also asks educators to consider medium and lower language proficiency needs.
Materials include limited opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, materials provide limited guidance on incorporating students’ holistic and cultural identities into the classroom, including learning about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds, inviting family or community members into the classroom, choosing materials that authentically represent students’ language and culture, and using intellectual preparation to plan for including students’ cultural identifies.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
Materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Teachers can access “ready-made slides and handouts which [they] can edit, download, print, or send to Google Classroom.” Materials do not include specific provisions for students to use digital technology in research or composing writing assignments. Materials do not include interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards. The digital platform is intended for teacher use.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are not available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials do not include digital technology. The materials do not include any specific opportunities or guidelines for students and/or teachers to collaborate with each other. Materials do not provide opportunities for students to complete activities digitally. Materials do not provide specific guidance requiring students to collaborate digitally with peers or teachers.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Student materials include images for vocabulary words. The assessments and text-based student materials are easily read, and the structure is easily accessible to students. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter. Materials include PDF documents that are organized in an accessible way. Materials provide graphic organizers when needed to help students with organization. The use of typography, layout, and space is visually appealing, though there is little variance in color and no engaging images.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a vocabulary package, which includes word cards and a student glossary. These two documents contain pictures that showcase an image of each vocabulary word. These images are not distracting and they support students’ learning.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The vocabulary pages and Target Task can be created for students, and are consistent and maintain the same layout. The information is easily identifiable and supports student understanding of the materials.
Throughout the curriculum, the teacher directions are consistent. There is a PDF version of each lesson and the lesson plan is consistent for each lesson.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Student materials do not include organizational features.
Each unit includes a lesson map. The layout is consistent across the curriculum.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials do not include embedded technology. Although teacher materials are digital, the use of technology is limited, and teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials do not provide specific lessons that incorporate teaching students how to use technology properly. Although materials include some general suggestions, such as instructing teachers that they should tell students to be certain that the resources they use are reliable, materials do not provide specifics on how to accomplish that task. Rather, teachers would have to develop guidelines and protocols for the use of technology independently.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found