About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Fishtank Plus ELA K-2 | ELA
ELA K-2
The instructional materials for Fishtank Plus Grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment and building knowledge but do not meet the expectations for usability. The materials include texts that are well-crafted. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. Because a similar topic or theme connects all units, students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge-building. There is not sufficient support or guidance in the program provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. While some guidance is provided, the suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of additional materials and scaffolds to the teacher.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for Kindergarten
Alignment Summary
The Fishtank Plus Kindergarten materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.
Kindergarten
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to Standards Components
Instructional materials include content rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders and cultures. Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Instructional materials increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences, and examine the structure of texts. Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year and include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions and connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year.
Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year, as the teacher models shared writing and students practice during independent writing using drawings, oral sentences, and writing. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards, and students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Materials provide explicit instruction, practice and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Materials provide explicit instruction of grade-level grammar and usage standards by embedding skills, modeling, guided practice, shared writing, and classroom discussions in some lessons, but lack explicit instruction and authentic application opportunities for students to write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes). Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units.
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Instructional materials include content rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders and cultures. Each unit includes both literary and informational texts based on an appropriate grade level theme or topic. The anchor texts in each unit include a variety of genres including but not limited to, poetry, biographies, fairy tales, fantasy, fables, realistic and historical fiction, narrative informational, and an illustrative guide. The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 49% informational and 51% literary. Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Quantitative, qualitative, and associated tasks have an overall complexity of accessible and moderate. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Some texts that may be at a lower Lexile are more complex in qualitative measures making them appropriate for the grade level. The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes a justification for the texts selected for the program and their educational placement in the grade, as well as a detailed analysis of the texts’ qualitative features. Instructional materials increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. The Teacher Tools section includes independent reading supports, such as independent reading guidelines, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
Instructional materials include content-rich texts encompassing diverse topics and student interests by award-winning authors. Texts have engaging illustrations with a variety of relatable characters including a blend of ethnicities, ages, genders, and cultures. Each unit includes both literary and informational texts based on an appropriate grade level theme. Texts contain academic vocabulary, and varied complex sentence structures including verse and prose. Multi-dimensional text features to support student learning and task completion.
Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, The Crayon Box that Talked by Shane Derolf has complex sentence structures, colorful illustrations and strong social and emotional themes of diversity.
In Unit 2, Hush! A Thai Lullaby by Minfong Ho is an award-winning text that includes complex sentence structure, academic vocabulary and onomatopoeia.
In Unit 3, Why Do Leaves Change Color? by Betty Maestro contains academic vocabulary, vibrant illustrations, and a familiar topic.
In Unit 4, Pele King of Soccer by Monica Brown is a bilingual English-Spanish text with vivid illustrations, an engaging story, and a culturally relevant story line.
In Unit 5, Tracks in the Snow by Wong Herbert Lee contains soft, quaint illustrations and simple rhythmic text.
In Unit 6, Let’s Talk About Race by Julius Lester features a strong social justice theme and rich academic vocabulary.
In Unit 7, The Ugly Duckling by Hans Christian Andersen and Jerry Pinkney is an award-winning text featuring colorful watercolor illustrations, rich language, academic vocabulary and a story of survival.
In Unit 8, Recycle! A Handbook for Kids by Gail Gibbons is an informational text containing academic vocabulary and captions which explain the process of recycling from start to finish.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
Instructional materials include a variety of literary and informational texts. The anchor texts in each unit include a variety of genres including but not limited to, poetry, biographies, fairy tales, fantasy, fables, realistic and historical fiction, narrative informational, and an illustrative guide. The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 49% informational and 51% literary.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
King of Kindergarten by Derrick Barnes (realistic fiction)
“I Like Myself” by Karen Beaumont (poetry)
You Hold Me Up by Monique Gray Smith (fiction)
Words Are Not For Hurting by Elizabeth Verdick (how-to book)
In Unit 2, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
The Very Busy Spider by Eric Carle (fiction)
We’re Going on a Lion Hunt by David Axtell (realistic-fiction)
Sitting Down to Eat by Bill Harley (poetry)
Rap a Tap Tap: Here's Bojangles-Think of That! by Leo Dillon (biography)
Caps for Sale: A Tale of a Peddler, Some Monkeys, and Their Monkey Business by Esphyr Slobodkina (folktale)
In Unit 3, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Fall Harvest: Bringing in Food by Martha E. H. Rustad (narrative)
Autumn Leaves by Ken Robbins (informational)
Leaf Man by Lois Ehlert (fantasy)
We’re Going on a Leaf Hunt by Steve Metzger (realistic fiction)
In Unit 4, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Dim Sum for Everyone by Grace Lin (realistic fiction)
Nino Wrestles the World by Yuyi Morales (fantasy)
The Tortoise and the Hare by Jerry Pinkey (fable)
In Unit 5, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Over and Under the Snow by Kate Messner (informational)
Wild Tracks! A Guide to Nature’s Footprints by Jim Arnosky (guide)
The Mitten by Jan Brett (folktale)
The Big Snow by Berta and Elmer Hader (fiction)
In Unit 6, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
All Are Welcome by Alexandra Penfold (narrative)
Let’s Talk About Race by Julius Lester (autobiography)
All the Colors of the Earth by Sheila Hamanaka (poetry)
Just Ask!: Be Different, Be Brave, Be You by Sonia Sotomayor (realistic fiction)
We March by Shane W. Evans (historical fiction)
Martin’s Big Words: The Life of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by Doreen Rappaport (biography)
I Have a Dream by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Kadir Nelson (speech)
In Unit 7, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
Who Will Plant a Tree? by Jerry Palotta (informational)
It’s Spring by Linda Glaser (narrative)
Summer Birds: The Butterflies of Maria Merian by Margarita Engle (realistic fiction)
In Unit 8, examples of genres include, but are not limited to:
What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Jess French (guide)
The Last Straw: Kids vs Plastics by Susan Hood (poetry)
Rainbow Weaver/ Tejedora del Arcoiris by Linda Elovitz Marshall (realistic fiction)
Harlem Grown: How One Big Idea Transformed a Neighborhood by Tony Hillery (informational)
Materials reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 49% informational and 51% literary.
The balance of informational and literary texts within each unit is as follows:
Unit 1 contains 10 core texts, of which two (20%) are informational and eight (80%) are literary.
Unit 2 contains nine core texts, with one (11%) being informational and eight (89%) being literary.
Unit 3 contains nine core texts, of which six (67%) are informational and three (33%) are literary.
Unit 4 contains 14 core texts, with five (36%) being informational and nine (64%) being literary.
Unit 5 contains 12 core texts, of which six (50%) are informational and six (50%) are literary.
Unit 6 contains 13 core texts, with six (46%) being informational and seven (53%) being literary.
Unit 7 contains 16 core texts, of which 13 (81%) are informational and three (19%) are literary.
Unit 8 contains eight core texts, with six (75%) being informational and two (25%) being literary.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1c.
Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade and gradually increase in quantitative complexity over the course of the year. Quantitative, qualitative, and associated tasks have an overall complexity of accessible and moderate. The Lexile level range is from 140L to 1040L. Associated tasks scaffold to become more complex throughout the year and several texts are used for multiple lessons and tasks. Some texts that may be at a lower Lexile are more complex in qualitative measures making them appropriate for the grade level. The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes a justification for the texts selected for the program and their educational placement in the grade, as well as a detailed analysis of the texts’ qualitative features.
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the Read-Aloud text Words Are Not For Hurting by Elizabeth Verdick has a quantitative rating of 450L. The qualitative rating is moderate due to relatable topics, situations, and diverse children characters. The associated task is rated as accessible. The students identify helpful and hurtful words and explain how the words make them feel.
In Unit 4, the Read-Aloud text The Tortoise and the Hare by Jerry Pinkney has few words, and uses illustrations to retell the classic folk tale. It has a moderate qualitative rating due to vibrant illustrations and thought-provoking content. The task level is low. Students retell the story using details from the beginning, middle and end of the text and think about how the story applies to life.
In Unit 7, the Read-Aloud text Frogs by Gail Gibbons has a quantitative rating of 600L. The qualitative rating is high due to the academic vocabulary. The associated task is accessible. Students answer detailed questions about each stage of the frog’s life cycle. With partners, students verbally explain the key stages in a frog’s life cycle and write two to three details about each stage in a frog’s life cycle.
Anchor/core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level at times. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Text Selection Rationale for each unit includes quantitative and qualitative complexity information for some texts. Some of the text complexity information is a summary of the unit texts rather than text-specific information, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of the provided qualitative information. Materials do not provide associated task complexity information. The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics on The Lexile Framework for Reading site.
In Unit 1, The Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range, as well as qualitative information. Text structures are simple and include chronological events which help to support students as they determine the theme of the texts, aspects of what it means to be part of a strong classroom community. The Read-Aloud text, The Crayon Box That Talked by Shane Derolf, is poetry. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because of their qualitative measures, particularly the levels of meaning.
In Unit 2, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range, as well as qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, We’re Going on a Lion Hunt by David Axtell, is a realistic fiction text. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen because of the simple, straightforward themes, and follow a simple, predictable pattern allowing a reader to easily familiarize themselves with the text. The texts also have simple sentences, and there are clear connections between the illustrations and text.
In Unit 5, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range as well as qualitative information. The Read-Aloud text, The Snowy Day by Ezra Jack Keats, is a narrative text. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen based on quantitative Lexile levels and are one to two grade levels above Kindergarten. The texts also have a simple text structure and a strong relationship between the illustrations and the text.
In Unit 6, the Text Selection Rationale includes the Lexile range and qualitative information for the texts. The Read-Aloud text, Let’s Talk About Race by Julius Lester, is an autobiographical narrative. According to the Text Selection Rationale, texts in this unit were chosen based on quantitative Lexile levels and are between first to fourth grade levels. The texts also have straightforward meanings but students need to have background knowledge on the Civil Rights Movement and segregation to fully comprehend the content.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1d.
Instructional materials increase in complexity throughout the year to support student literacy growth. Texts range in complexity from 140L to 1040L. Texts become more complex with appropriate teacher guidance and scaffolds included. Materials break student tasks into smaller steps and allow students additional time for their completion. Supporting teacher resources include suggestions to build background knowledge and discussion prompts. Texts represent a diverse range of perspectives, feelings and experiences. Texts often span multiple lessons, appear in multiple associated tasks, and are grouped with other selections to build content knowledge.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, texts range in quantitative complexity from 140L to 720L. In Lesson 7, the teacher reads aloud Ruthie and the (Not So) Teeny Tiny Lie by Laura Rankin (AD 490L), stopping to ask questions about the main character and how she changes from the beginning to the end of the story. With teacher prompting, students identify the key event in the middle of the story that initiates the change. The students write in response to the following prompt: “What did we learn from the book?”
In Unit 3, texts range in quantitative complexity from 310L to 650L. In Lesson 3, students describe what happens to leaves in the fall by retelling details from Why Do Leaves Change Color? by Betsy Maestro (580L). Students draw and write about what happens to leaves as the tree gets ready for winter. As students use details from the text in their writing, the teacher also encourages them to use the academic term chlorophyll. In Lesson 4, students have the opportunity to add details to their writing and drawing.
In Unit 5, texts range in quantitative complexity from 440L to1040L. In Lesson 5, the teacher reads aloud The Mitten by Jan Brett (600L) and asks questions about the characters and key events. Students write in response to the following prompt: “Based on what you know about animals and winter, could this story happen in real life? Explain why or why not.”
In Unit 8, texts range in quantitative complexity from 480L to 1030L. In Lesson 6, the teacher reads Recycle! A Handbook for Kids by Gail Gibbons (AD 840L). Students describe paper-making steps. The teacher prompts students to use the illustrations as a support to remember all the steps in order. In Lesson 14, students write their own informational book to explain the “Three R’s” of Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 7, the teacher reads aloud Ruthie and the (Not So) Teeny Tiny Lie by Laura Rankin. Students describe the author's purpose by asking and answering questions about the main character and key events in the text. The teacher supports students through building background knowledge and providing language supports and scaffolded questioning.
In Unit 3, Lesson 3, students answer direct questions from Fall Leaves by Ken Robbins. Materials include examples of sentence stems to help students answer the questions.
In Unit 5, Lessons 2 and 4, students listen to and discuss multiple pages in It’s Snowing by Gail Gibbons. In Lesson 5, materials provide additional support with scaffolded questions to guide students’ thinking, building background and accessing prior knowledge, language support, support for close reading illustrations, and opportunities for enrichment.
In Unit 7, Lessons 19–20, students spend two days listening to and discussing the characters, and major events in The Ugly Duckling by Hans Christian Andersen and Jerry Pinkney. Supports include teacher prompting and questioning, as well as partner discussions using turn and talks.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the expectations of Indicator 1e.
Materials include a large volume of literary and informational texts that range in variety. The Text and Materials tab includes a link to a suggested text list for Independent Reading. Guidance in the Teacher Tools section recommends allotting an additional 15–30 minutes a day for independent reading. The Teacher Tools section includes independent reading supports, such as independent reading guidelines, an independent reading log, sample lesson plans, and a parent letter.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 6, students listen to the fiction text, The Napping House by Audrey Wood and retell what happens in the beginning, middle, and end of the story.
In Unit 6, Lesson 12, students listen to the informational text, We March by Shane W. Evans. Afterwards, students discuss and write about how people came together during the March for Freedom.
In Unit 8, Lesson 12, students listen to the true story, Harlem Grown: How One Big Idea Transformed a Neighborhood by Tony Hillery. Students either respond to the Target Task question, “Explain how Mr. Tony’s idea transformed the neighborhood,” or write about “what they can learn from Mr. Tony.”
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, there are a total of 12 lessons. Students listen to 10 texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 14 fiction text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Welcome to School.” In Lessons 1–10, students listen to a different anchor text each day. In Lesson 11, students reflect on their learning from each of the texts and “[e]xplain what it means to be part of a classroom community and how they can make the classroom community a fun place to be.”
In Unit 5, there are a total of 19 lessons. Students listen to 12 texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 22 suggestions for independent reading, including additional texts by Jan Brett, and fiction and informational texts with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Winter Wonderland.” After “[brainstorming] two or three questions about winter” in Lesson 1, students listen to It’s Snowing! by Gail Gibbons in Lessons 2 and 4 and The Story of Snow: The Science of Winter’s Wonder by Mark Cassino in Lesson 3. After listening to The Snowy Day by Ezra Jack Keats in Lesson 5, students use their learning to discuss and write about “what makes winter beautiful.” Then, students listen to Animals in Winter by Henrietta Bancroft in Lesson 7. In Lessons 8–9, students listen to The Big Snow by Berta and Elmer Hader. In Lessons 10-14, students listen to a different anchor text each day. In Lessons 15–17, students listen to a different Jan Brett story each day.
In Unit 7, there are a total of 22 lessons. Students listen to 16 texts, and the Recommended Texts for Independent Reading list contains 20 informational text suggestions with themes and topics that align to the unit theme, “Exploring Life Cycles.” In Lessons 1–6, students listen to a different anchor text each day and use their learning to “[w]rite a story about a seed that travels from one place to another” in Lesson 7. In Lesson 8, students listen to pages 1–21 of Frogs by Gail Gibbons and From Tadpole to Frog by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld in Lesson 9. Students use their learning from the two texts to “[w]rite an informational text to teach about a frog’s life cycle” in Lesson 10 and resume listening to a different anchor text each day in Lessons 11–13. After “[writing] a book that teaches about each stage in a butterfly’s life cycle in Lesson 14, students resume listening to a different anchor text each day in Lessons 15–17. Students “[w]rite a story about a baby bird hatching from an egg in Lesson 18, and finish the unit listening to The Ugly Duckling by Hans Christian Andersen and Jerry Pinkney in Lessons 19–20.
There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers.(e.g., proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading, independent reading procedures are included in the lessons.) Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, the Reading Structures and Routines section outlines several ways to incorporate independent reading into daily lessons.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), guidelines for independent reading note the following: tasks should be relevant to students; students should experience a wide range of materials, genres, and text types; students should have choice in both books they read and how they respond to reading; students should have opportunities to share their reading with peers; and students need sustained independent reading time. Guidance encourages teachers to provide books that align with the unit themes and topic for student choice during independent reading.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), the Monitoring Student Comprehension section includes independent reading routines for teacher use to monitor students as they read independently. Independent reading routines include Discussion/Book Groups, Book Talks, Book Reviews, and Conferences. Book Review guidance states, “Students can have one reading log/journal for a variety of purposes, or a separate log/journal for different purposes,” and references the sample Student Independent Reading Log, Student Independent Reading Journal (Writing Prompt), and Student Independent Reading Journal (Summary) templates provided.
In Teacher Tools, Independent Reading (K–5), the Planning for Independent Reading section includes questions for teachers to consider as they prepare their classroom for independent reading. This teacher support also contains independent reading weekly planning templates, examples of how teachers can successfully begin and sustain independent reading, and examples of parent letters that address independent reading.
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences, and examine the structure of texts. Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to engage with the text and build content knowledge and provide guidance for teachers to plan and implement text-based questions and tasks. Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year. The Academic Discourse section in the Teacher Tools includes varied protocols for whole group, small group, and partner discussions. Materials include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions and connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year. Support for teachers on how to provide instruction and support with Speaking and Listening can be found in the Academic Discourse Teacher Tool. The majority of discussions pertain to the unit texts or topics and the Teacher Tools also provide guidance for developing and implementing student discussion protocols across the curriculum and include ways to monitor student discussions. Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year. Lessons and the Teacher Tools contain sentence frames, teacher modeling, teacher feedback, writing exemplars, and writing rubric. The teacher models shared writing and students practice during independent writing using drawings, oral sentences, and writing. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards, and students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Teacher instruction attends to the different demands required of opinion, informational, and narrative writing, equipping students with the skills and knowledge to identify qualities of each type. Materials provide explicit instruction, practice and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Although writing lessons do not occur daily, materials provide writing lessons in every unit. Writing opportunities integrate speaking, listening and reading and connect to the texts students listen to.
The teacher leads discussions, models the writing process, and provides sentence frames prior to students engaging in independent writing. Materials provide some explicit instruction of grade-level grammar and usage standards by embedding skills, modeling, guided practice, shared writing, and classroom discussions in some lessons. Materials lack explicit instruction and authentic application opportunities for students to write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes). Instructional materials identify key vocabulary words and list them at the beginning of each unit and lesson throughout the year. Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.
Materials contain text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks that support students as they explore key details and academic language, make inferences and examine the structure of texts. Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to engage with the text and build content knowledge. Students use pictures and information from texts to support their speaking and writing responses. Materials provide guidance for teachers to plan and implement text-based questions and tasks. Each lesson includes sample responses to questions and tasks, as well as Language Supports and Additional Supports for discussion questions. The Unit Launch contains the Essential Questions and guidance for teachers to customize the unit for their students. The Teacher Tools section titled Academic Discourse provides guidance for teachers during class discussions.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 5, after listening to The Crayon Box That Talked by Shane Derolf, students respond to the following text-specific questions: “What are the crayons saying? How are they feeling?”; “What is the girl doing?”; “How are the crayons changing?”; and “What lesson do the crayons learn in the end? Why is this important?”
In Unit 4, Lesson 6, during the read-aloud, Dreamers by Yuyi Morales, students respond to the following text-specific questions: “How does Yuyi feel when she is crossing the bridge? How do you know?”; “Yuyi is an immigrant. An immigrant is a person who goes to live permanently in another country. How were things different for Yuyi in the United States?”; “Yuyi says they became ‘caminantes.’ What do you think the word ‘caminantes’ means?”; “What words does Yuyi use to describe the library? Why?”; and “What do Yuyi and her son learn at the library? How does it make them feel?” After the reading, students discuss and write in response to one of the following prompts, “How did Yuyi overcome the challenges she faced in the United States?” or “What message is Yuyi trying to share with her readers?”
In Unit 6, Lesson 2, during a read-aloud of Let’s Talk About Race by Julius Lester, students respond to text-based questions such as, “The author says, ‘Your race is not all that you are.’ Tell two reasons why. (p. 29).”
In Unit 8, Lesson 1, while listening to What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Janet French, students respond to Key Questions including, but not limited to, “What is waste? Why is it a problem?”; “What is the problem with household waste?”; and “What is a landfill? What are the problems with a landfill?” After the reading, students discuss and write in response to this Target Task prompt: “What is waste? Name two reasons waste is a problem.”
Teacher materials provide support for the planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 6, after reading The Napping House by Audrey Wood, one discussion question is: “What happens in the middle of the story?” Materials provide the teacher with the following sample response: “dreaming child, a dozing dog, a snoozing cat, and a slumbering mouse all get onto the bed.” Materials also include a Language Support question, “What word does the author use to describe the child?”, as well as this Additional Support: “Make sure students use the full description when describing what happens. Instead of saying a child gets on the bed, make sure students say a dreaming child.”
In Unit 4, Lesson 6, as the teacher reads aloud Dreamers by Yuyi Morales, students respond to a series of text-specific questions. To aid students with accessing the text and Target Task, materials include the following Additional Supports: “If needed, Close Read the following sentences: ‘The sky and the land welcomed us in words unlike those of our ancestors.’ An ancestor is a relative. What language did Yuyi’s ancestors speak? What language is spoken in the United States?” and “Close Read the pictures to help students build a deeper understanding of why things were challenging for Yuyi and the mistakes that she made.”
In Unit 5, Lesson 7, as students discuss Animals in Winter by Henrietta Bancroft and Richard G. Van Gelder, the teacher uses the formative data collected during the discussions to drive the supports used to aid students with accessing the text and task. When responding to the text-specific questions, “Which animals migrate? Why do they migrate? What would happen if they did not migrate? (p.10),” materials include the following Language Support: “Have students use context to determine the meaning of the word ‘migrate.’ If students are unable to figure out what the word means, teach students that if an animal migrates, it moves from one habitat to another depending on the season.”
In Unit 7, Lesson 5, as the teacher reads aloud The Tiny Seed by Eric Carle, students respond to questions such as, “What happens to the tiny seed? Why? (p.26)” To support the teacher with the implementation of these text-specific questions, materials list the corresponding page number from the text, as well as an example of a correct response: “The tiny seed grows into a giant flower. It is the most beautiful flower that people, birds, and bees have ever seen. This happens because the tiny seed gets lots of water and rain.”
In the Teacher Tools, Types of Formative Assessments, materials provide a table that includes teacher guidance on how to utilize the Key Questions as checks for understanding during the daily lesson, as well as how to use the Target Tasks to monitor student comprehension, content knowledge, writing, or oral language development. This section also includes Target Task Rubrics for reading responses.
In the Teacher Tools, Components of an ELA Lesson, materials include definitions for each part of an ELA lesson. In the Internalizing a Lesson section, teacher guidance supports teachers with determining which Key Questions are critical to students understanding the text and Target Task, and brainstorming what support students might need to answer the key questions.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.
Materials include a number of formal protocols and informal structures in the Teacher Tools section to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the year. The Academic Discourse section in the Teacher Tools includes varied protocols for whole group, small group, and partner discussions. Materials include teacher guidance to support the facilitation and monitoring of students’ evidence-based discussions.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, the Types of Academic Discourse section of Academic Discourse lists the program’s speaking and listening protocols for each tier. Materials provide two whole group, four small group, and five partner discussion protocols.
Whole Class Discussion Protocols: Take a Stand and Fishbowl
Group Discussion Protocols: Simultaneous Round Table, Rally Coach, Talking Chips, and Numbered Heads Together
Partner Conversation Protocols: Think-Pair-Share, Write-Pair-Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share-Revise, and Partner A/B
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Tools contains a section titled Academic Discourse. The Overview page of this section includes links to additional guidance: Preparing for Academic Discourse, Types of Academic Discourse, Tiers of Academic Discourse, and Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse. These supports, which are introduced and reinforced throughout units and linked in lessons, allow teachers to leverage their expertise and select the protocol that best meets the needs of their students and the lesson content.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students brainstorm questions about fall and the teacher records the questions on the class-created KWL chart. Teacher guidance includes the following think aloud: “When I look at this cover, there are so many things I wonder about. Some things do not make sense to me. Those are things I want to learn more about. So I am going to think about some questions. I am also going to use my question words to help me. In this picture, I see lots of rain. I might ask, ‘Why does it rain in the fall?’ I also see lots of leaves falling from the trees. I might ask, ‘When do the leaves fall?’”
In Unit 6, Lesson 8, after reading This Is the Dream by Diane Z. Shore and Jessica Alexander aloud to the class, the teacher leads “students in a discussion of how life changed for Black people in the South after the civil rights movement.” Guidance directs teachers to “[e]ncourage students to use the words ‘justice,’ ‘freedom,’ ‘racism,’ and ‘segregation’ in their answers.”
In Unit 8, Lesson 16, students reflect on their learning during the unit and brainstorm “changes they can make in their lives to limit waste.” Lesson guidance includes two brainstorming options. The teacher may have students “brainstorm different steps the class can take to limit waste in the classroom,” or the teacher may have students “think about what they can do individually to limit the amount of waste that they create.” Regardless of the option selected, guidance directs the teacher to “lead students in a discussion of what steps they would need to take to make the plan happen.”
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.
Materials connect speaking and listening skills to the texts students are reading throughout the year. Support for teachers on how to provide instruction and support with Speaking and Listening can be found in the Academic Discourse Teacher Tool. This tool provides support structures for varied discussions and time for students to develop skills in collaborative, reciprocal conversations that build and develop ideas or the ideas of others through careful listening and responding. The majority of discussions pertain to the unit texts or topics and the Teacher Tools also provide guidance for developing and implementing student discussion protocols across the curriculum and include ways to monitor student discussions. Lessons provide sentence stems for students and recommendations for ways that teachers can model speaking and listening skills.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others and taking turns speaking about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, the teacher reminds students of the expectations for engaging in discussion and how discussion norms help them be a better listener. “For example, look at the speaker, put your hand down when someone else is speaking and do not interrupt others.”
Add drawings or other visual displays to descriptions as desired to provide additional detail. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, after students share what they like about themselves with their partners, students draw or write something they like about themselves.
In Unit 2, Lesson 5, after students partner share, they return to their seats to write about what happened in the beginning, middle, and end of the Sitting Down to Eat by Bill Harley. Students include specific details in their drawings or words to show what happens.
In Unit 5, Lesson 17, students retell a key event from Annie and the Wild Animals by Jan Brett. Students are encouraged to include specific details from the text, as well as illustrations.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Continue a conversation through multiple exchanges. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 4, students are directed that the goal in this unit is to continue a conversation through multiple exchanges. This means that they need to be listening closely to what their classmates are saying and then adding on to their ideas. Students have been doing this with the different Turn and Talk protocols they have been using, but now they will focus on this in whole class discussions. During the discussion, the teachers models how to use different sentence frames to add on to what their classmates are saying.
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, students engage in Turn and Talk about which book was their favorite and why they thought it was their favoriet. Students are reminders that when tehy are discussing they chould be listening closely to their partners; ideas and adding on or asking questions. Sentence stems are provided for discourse and after the parner discussion students share out with the class and build on to the books their classmates share using the sentence stems.
Confirm understanding of a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media by answering questions about key details. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 5, while listening to Sitting Down to Eat by Bill Harley, students answer Key Questions “individually, with a partner in a Turn and Talk, during a class discussion, or in a Stop and Jot.” Some Key Questions include, “Who was at the door? Why does the boy let the elephant in?” and “How does the little boy respond each time a new animal comes to the door? What does this show us about him?”
In Unit 3, Lesson 6, while listening to Autumn Leaves by Ken Robbins, students respond to Key Questions such as, “What are some ways leaves are the same? What are some ways leaves are different?”
In Unit 5, Lesson 16, while listening to The Hat by Jan Brett, students answer questions about key details such as, “How does Hedgie feel when he finds the sock? How do you know?” and “Retell what happens with the gander, cat, farm dog, and pig.”
In Unit 8, Lesson 1, students listen to What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Jess French. The class creates a KWL chart on the topic of waste. At the end of the first lesson, students think of any questions they have about the reading and the teacher charts these questions.
Ask and answer questions in order to seek help, get information, or clarify something that is not understood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students work with a partner and practice crafting questions using question words—who, what, where, when, why and how—and book covers about the topic of fall. Lesson guidance states, “We will come up with some questions, and then as we read lots of different books, we can come back to the questions to see if we have answered them.”
In Unit 8, Lesson 1, students listen to What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Jess French. At the close of the lesson, students write down why they think waste is a problem or write a question they have. Students do not answer the questions they write.
Describe familiar people, places, things, and events and, with prompting and support, provide additional detail. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 3, students discuss what the main character in the book, I Like Myself by Karen Beaumont, likes about herself. After discussing the little girl, students turn and talk with a partner and then write or draw about what they like about themselves. The teacher does not prompt or support students with providing additional detail.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students turn and talk about what they know about fall, and share these facts with the class to create a KWL chart. The teacher displays the covers of four to five books and models looking at one of the covers to think about questions they might ask. Students then “use the covers of the books to think of additional questions they may have about fall,” while working with a partner.
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, students listen to All Are Welcome by Alexandra Penrod. After discussing ways characters are similar or different, the teacher leads students in a discussion about what the author means by “all our welcome.” Students provide specific examples from the text. Next, the teacher leads the class in a discussion on one of the following topics: what they can do to show that all people are welcome in their classroom or their own identities based on the groups identified in the text. While materials provide Suggested Supports to aid students with making text-to-self connections, the teacher does not prompt or support students with providing additional detail during the discussions.
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.
Materials include explicit writing instruction lessons and the writing that students are expected to produce grows throughout the year. Lessons and the Teacher Tools contain sentence frames, teacher modeling, teacher feedback, writing exemplars, and writing rubrics. The teacher models shared writing and students practice independent writing using drawings, oral sentences, and writing. Students write in response to texts individually and with partners, complete research-based writing, and develop their writing as a form of personal expression to convey information to others. Students learn to self-assess their writing using editing checklists. Materials include some digital resources, such as Google and Youtube videos.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, students draw and write about their favorite book from the unit. The teacher records dictations. The expectation is a “clear drawing that explains why a particular book is their favorite with accurate details” and for students to try to write a sentence to match the picture. The teacher uses the Grade K Writing Rubrics to monitor students’ progress.
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, students write letters to the author Grace Lin explaining which of her books was their favorite and why. Students use sentence frames as needed, and focus on writing complete sentences with details to explain.
In Unit 6, Lesson 16, students create a poster using specific details about how they would be a good king in both their writing and illustration.
In Unit 7, Lesson 10, students draw upon their learning from texts read in Lessons 8–9 to write an informational book about each stage in the life cycle of a frog.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Lesson 19, students draw upon their learning from texts about winter animals read aloud throughout the unit to “[w]rite a story about what happens when you follow some animal tracks.” After the teacher models the editing process, students edit a few sentences by looking for words to replace with more meaningful words and using phonics to correct their spelling.
In Unit 6, Lesson 5, students create an All About Me poster explaining their identity. Students draw a self-portrait and other pictures which are important to their identity. Students revise, edit, and share their posters with the class. After discussion, students write one way they are similar to their classmates and one way they are different.
In Unit 7, Lesson 18, students write an informational narrative based on what they learned about the life cycle of a chicken and include illustrations. On Day 1, students brainstorm using the Narrative Writing Brainstorm tool. On Day 2, students “use their brainstorms to write [their] stories” and include “specific details in their illustrations and text,” “different sentence types,” and “content from the unit.” On Day 3, students edit and share their work with a partner.
In Unit 8, Lesson 13, students draw upon their learning from texts read aloud during the unit to create an ABC poem about items that can be reduced, reused, or recycled. Each student receives a letter and their job is to think of an item starting with that letter that can be reduced, reused, or recycled. Students draw an item and write a sentence or two on how to reduce, reuse, or recycle the item. Students can use sentence frames when writing.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Lesson 3, the teacher may show students a YouTube video depicting the life cycle of a bean, as a Suggested Support for Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing(year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice and apply different types of writing required by the standards. Students often write about personal ideas and opinions in reaction to ideas within the text. Writing instruction often begins with a task-related discussion followed by teacher modeling and shared writing or a practice activity before students independently craft their own products. Teacher instruction attends to the different demands required of opinion, informational, and narrative writing, equipping students with the skills and knowledge to identify qualities of each type. Supports include sentence frames and prompting questions. Materials ground most writing tasks in the texts students listen to, with texts serving as the basis for prompts or models.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:
Materials provide six opportunities for opinion writing and instruction. Six of 19 opportunities (32%) are opinion in nature.
In Unit 1, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 2, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Unit 3, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 4, there are four opportunities for opinion writing. Four of five writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Unit 5, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 6, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 7, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 8, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of two writing opportunities for this unit is opinion in nature.
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:
Materials provide nine opportunities for informative/explanatory writing and instruction. Nine of 19 (47%) opportunities are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 1, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 2, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 3, there are two opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 4, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 5, there are two opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Two of three writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 6, there are two opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory.
In Unit 7, there are two opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Two of four writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 8, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of two writing opportunities for this unit is informative/explanatory in nature.
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:
Materials provide four opportunities for narrative writing. Four of 19 (21%) opportunities are narrative in nature.
In Unit 1, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 2, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 3, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 4, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. One of five writing opportunities for this unit is narrative in nature.
In Unit 5, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. One of three writing opportunities for this unit is narrative in nature.
In Unit 6, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 7, there are two opportunities for narrative writing. Two of four writing opportunities for this unit are narrative in nature.
In Unit 8, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
Explicit instruction in opinion writing:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, the teacher explains that an opinion needs to include why. The teacher models how to write an opinion providing details the students can use.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 3, Lesson 10, the teacher models a Think Aloud while “drawing a picture that explains what happens to leaves in the fall.” After explaining that adding labels makes information clearer for readers, the teacher models “labeling key parts of the picture,” while reinforcing “how to print letters correctly.”
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 4, Lesson 21, the teacher uses the Narrative Writing Brainstorm Graphic Organizer (Kindergarten) to model brainstorming story topics. On Day 1, the teacher explains what is included in the beginning, middle, and end of a story and models brainstorming each section. On Day 2, the teacher explains why it is necessary to include specific details in illustrations and models including specific details in an illustration for the first event of the story. The teacher then models writing one to two sentences to match the illustration. On Day 3, the teacher models how to show character feelings by adding facial expressions or speech bubbles and adds a sentence about the character’s feelings. On Day 4, the teacher models using capitals and periods to edit sentences.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. For example:
Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing.
Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose opinion pieces in which they tell a reader the topic or the name of the book they are writing about and state an opinion or preference about the topic or book (e.g., My favorite book is...).
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, students write an opinion letter to Grace Lin explaining which book was their favorite and why. Students draw a picture to match.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example:
Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose informative/explanatory texts in which they name what they are writing about and supply some information about the topic.
In Unit 8, Lesson Lesson 14, students begin a multi-lesson project in which they write an informational book “to teach their families about the Three R’s.” On Day 1, students “write about one of the Three R’s,” which will serve as one page in their informational book. Guidance encourages the teacher to use class anchor charts and the Sentence-Level Feedback and Support (K–5th Grade) resource, along with targeted feedback, with students who are struggling to write complete sentences. Students write about another one of the three R’s on Day 2, resulting in another finished page in their book. Materials provide the same supports as Day 1. Students write about the last of the Three R’s on Day 3. As a support, the teacher may “pull a small group to review with students how to include specific details or how to use transitions.” Students “reread their work and edit for capital letters, punctuation, complete sentences, and spelling,” and “use the Editing Checklist (K–2) to assess their own writing.” Students create a plan to limit waste in the classroom or in their lives. Students explain why their plan is the best plan.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example:
Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to narrate a single event or several loosely linked events, tell about the events in the order in which they occurred, and provide a reaction to what happened.
In Unit 7, Lesson 4, students write about one stage in a sunflower’s life. In Lesson 8 and Lesson 9, students write and illustrate one life cycle they have been studying. In Lesson 10, after reading another story about the life cycle of a frog, students go back to their writing and illustrations and add more details. In Lesson 14, students create their own story about the life of a chick using information from three texts to support their writing. Students brainstorm, illustrate with details, and use a variety of sentence types over a period of three days.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example:
In Unit 1, Lesson 10, students write and draw about what they are going to do to hold up one another after reading the book, You Hold Me Up by Monique Gray Smith.
In Unit 3, Lesson 7, after reading the book Leaf Man by Lois Ehlert, students make their own leaf person scene. Students write a sentence explaining where the leaf person has gone and share it with a partner.
In Unit 4, Lesson 10, students write an opinion letter to Yuyi Morales explaining which of her books was their favorite. Students must include specific examples and facts from the book to explain why it was their favorite.
In Unit 7, Lesson 2, after listening to the book What Alive? by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld, students write in response to the prompt, “How can you tell something is alive? What do all living things need to survive?” Students draw one thing that is alive and one thing that is not living.
In Unit 8, Lesson 14, students write an informational book to explain the “Three R’s” (reduce, reuse, recycle). Students use information they have learned from texts read throughout the unit.
Indicator 1K
Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1k.
Materials provide explicit instruction, practice, and application for evidence-based writing opportunities across the school year. Although writing lessons do not occur daily, materials provide writing lessons in every unit. Writing opportunities integrate speaking, listening and reading and connect to the texts students listen to. Students use details from the readings in their illustrations and labels. The teacher leads discussions, models the writing process, and provides sentence frames prior to students engaging in independent writing. Students also have opportunities to plan their writing orally with a partner before illustrating, labeling, and writing sentences.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, the teacher leads a discussion of different reasons books could be a favorite and provides sentence frames “My favorite book was ___. I liked it because___.” and “My favorite book was ___ because ___.” The teacher models drawing a favorite book including specific details from the book in the drawing. Next, the teacher models writing a matching sentence.
In Unit 3, Lesson 10, the teacher models drawing a picture that explains what happens to leaves in the fall including details using Think Aloud. The teacher explains that ideas become clear to readers by adding labels that identify different parts of the illustration. The teacher models labeling key parts of the picture. While modeling, the teacher reinforces how to print letters correctly. Students then write their own text about what happens to leaves in the fall. The teacher circulates and prompts students by asking, “Tell me about your picture. What other details can you include? What label could you put for x?” ensuring students are able to answer using complete sentences. Lastly, students use their pictures to teach a partner about what happens to leaves in the fall.
In Unit 4, Lesson 15, the teacher leads a discussion of which Monica Brown books were the students' favorites and the reasons why. Then the teacher provides a sentence frame: “I liked____, because____.” The teacher models writing a letter to Monica Brown during Shared Writing and models using specific nouns and a matching picture.
In Unit 8, Lesson 16, the teacher leads a brainstorming session on plans to reduce waste and the steps needed to make the plan work. Next, the teacher models writing the plan and models using “I think” to make their opinion clear. The teacher provides students with four sentence frames to use during independent writing.
Writing opportunities are focused on students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, students draw a picture and write one to two sentences about their favorite book from the unit. Students include a reason why using specific details from the book.
In Unit 4, Lesson 10, students write a letter to the author Yuyi Morales explaining which book from the unit was their favorite and why. Students must include the title of the book and a specific detail from the book to explain why the book is their favorite. Students draw a picture to support their choice.
In Unit 8, Lesson 16, students write a plan to reduce waste and explain why their plan is the best. Students use the words “I think” and explain why using “because.” Students synthesize knowledge of different ways to reduce waste learned from the unit study to develop their personal plans.
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
Materials provide some explicit instruction of grade-level grammar and usage standards by embedding skills, modeling, guided practice, shared writing, and classroom discussions in some lessons. Materials lack explicit instruction and authentic application opportunities for students to write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes).
Materials include explicit instruction in some of the grade-level grammar and usage standards. Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to print many upper- and lowercase letters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 14, the teacher reminds students to form letters using what they have been learning when they add words to label their drawings.
In Unit 4, Lesson 6, the teacher circulates while students are writing to ensure students are using correct letter formation, end punctuation, and correct capitalization.
In Unit 7, Lesson 2, the teacher reminds students that writers edit for spelling, correct letter formation and capitalization. Students then edit their work with partners.
Students have opportunities to use frequently occurring nouns and verbs. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Lesson 21, students learn that writers use verbs to show action. The teacher shares sentences and prompts students to identify the verbs in each sentence. The teacher asks, “What other verbs could we add to this story?” The teacher models going back to the illustration on Day 2 to add a few sentences with verbs. After modeling, students identify areas in their stories where they can add verbs to describe the action. Students orally create sentences and share them with a partner. Next, students try to write their sentences.
In Unit 5, Lesson 6, students develop a list of nouns and verbs about winter. Students participate in a Shared Writing about winter and create sentences that describe why winter is beautiful using some of the nouns and verbs.
In Unit 5, Lesson 19, the teacher explains a list of precise verbs to take the place of walk. Students act out each word. The class reads sentences containing the word walk and decides which precise verb would best replace walk. Students look at their own writing and underline every time they see the word walk. Students replace walk with other words from the list and add more sentences to their writing using the new words from the lesson.
In Unit 7, Lesson 18, the teacher models a piece of writing and prompts students to notice the different verbs that were used.
Students have opportunities to form regular plural nouns orally by adding /s/ or /es/ (e.g., dog, dogs; wish, wishes). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 15, the teacher explains what a noun is and uses mentor sentences to explain how nouns show specificity. During group practice, the class practices adding specific nouns to replace the words things and stuff in the sentences provided. When jotting down student answers, the teacher uses a think aloud to explain how they added /s/ and /es/ to the noun if there was more than one item. The teacher models writing a few sentences using specific nouns to the drawing from Day 1. During independent writing, students write sentences that go with their Day 1 drawing. If needed, the students can use a sentence frame to add a specific noun.
In Unit 4, Lesson 10, during shared writing, the teacher models writing a letter. During this time, the teacher asks students, “What nouns did I use? Why?” How do they help readers understand why I liked the book? Where did I use capital letters? Why?”
Students have opportunities to understand and use question words (interrogatives) (e.g., who, what, where, when, why, how). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, students learn how to use question words to brainstorm one to two questions about fall utilizing the KWL strategy. The teacher models how to use the question words to construct a sentence. The teacher teaches students what a question is and explains that when writing a question, the sentence ends with a question mark. The teacher introduces question words and when to use each one. The teacher models constructing a question using a think aloud strategy. Students craft questions about their own lives as practice. Then, students use the covers of the unit books, and work with a partner to come up with questions about fall. As students share with the class, the teacher charts the students’ questions on the KWL chart.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, students ask questions based on the cover of the book. The teacher prompts students to use question words they used in Unit 3 as an additional support.
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, the teacher explains what the words who, what, where, when, why, and how mean. The teacher holds up book covers and models asking questions about the books. Students create questions about other books using different question words. The teacher records their questions on a KWL chart.
In Unit 6, Lesson 5, the teacher models answering questions about themselves and filling in the All About Me poster. Students work to fill in the poster about themselves independently. The teacher circulates and asks questions about the students’ answers as they work.
Students have opportunities to use the most frequently occurring prepositions (e.g., to, from, in, out, on, off, for, of, by, with). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Lesson 7, the teacher introduces students to the prepositions in, out, on by, above, below, and under and explains that prepositions tell where things are. The teacher writes four sentences and students identify the prepositions in the sentences. Then students complete sentence frames using the proper preposition. Students return to their earlier written work and add a sentence with a preposition to explain where something was.
Students have opportunities to produce and expand complete sentences in shared language activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 5, students orally produce complete simple sentences from fragments after receiving instruction on the components of a complete sentence. The teacher explains that sentences tell who or what does something and what they did. The teacher orally models the process of determining if a sentence is complete or incomplete using the think aloud strategy for two examples. Then, students help the teacher determine if a sentence is complete or incomplete in the next two examples. During shared writing, the teacher displays fragments, and students work in pairs to orally decide what part of the sentence is missing and complete the sentences. During independent writing, students turn incomplete sentences into complete sentences in various ways, including orally with a partner, in a drawing, or in writing. When writing, students make sure their sentence begins with a capital letter and ends with a period.
In Unit 5, Lesson 14, the teacher models writing an answer to the question, “What do animals do during the winter?” Students write their own responses to the same question and use two vocabulary words and one exclamation. The teacher circulates and prompts students to use more specific words and names of things in their sentences. Students revise their work by expanding their sentences using precise language.
In Unit 6, Lesson 16, the teacher models writing a sentence about being a King and then adds four detailed sentences. The teacher also models adding details to the illustration. Students independently create posters about being a King and include detailed sentences and illustration.
In Unit 7, Lessons 3–4, the teacher directs students to use the words first, then, next, and last to convey a sense of sequence to describe steps. The teacher creates a class chart of sequence words and adds new words and phrases to the chart as they appear in the text. Students use sequence words in their answers. The class reviews sequence words again at the end of the lesson.
In Unit 8, Lesson 4, students write about the three R’s—reuse, reduce and recycle—and expand sentences using the conjunction, because, to explain why each is important. In Lesson 14, students write paragraphs to teach others about recycling and use the sequential phrase For example to expand sentences by providing an example.
Students have opportunities to capitalize the first word in a sentence and the pronoun I. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 5, students learn that a complete sentence includes a capital letter and ends with a period.
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, while modeling how to write a letter, the teacher points out where capital letters and punctuation marks are located in the sentence. Teacher guidance states, “Make sure students know to capitalize the first letter of the sentence and the pronoun, I, and they should put a period at the end of their sentence.”
In Unit 4, Lesson 21, the teacher displays a sentence for the class. The teacher asks students, “What words are capitalized? Why?” Students then look at their writing and look for places where they used capitals correctly. If needed, students revise their writing for correct capitalization.
In Unit 8, Lesson 14, students edit their writing for capital letters, ending punctuation, complete sentences and the spelling of high-frequency words.
Students have opportunities to recognize and name end punctuation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Lesson 21, the teacher displays a sentence for the class. The teacher asks students, “Where does the author use periods? Why?”. Students then look at their writing and look for places where they used periods correctly. If needed, students revise their writing for use of correct punctuation.
In Unit 5, Lesson 1, the teacher explains that questions end in question marks. After the teacher models writing questions with question marks by recording student questions on a KWL chart, students independently write one question and use a question mark to end their sentence.
In Unit 5, Lesson 6, the teacher explains how exclamation points can show different strong emotions. The teacher models different sentences with exclamation points and the class creates new sentences together with exclamation points. Students independently write exclamation sentences about something that makes winter beautiful.
In Unit 7, Lesson 10, the teacher reviews exclamation sentences and asks students why these sentence types are used. The teacher encourages students to use a variety of sentence types when writing an informational book about the life cycle of a frog. In Lesson 14, the teacher provides a model for writing the life cycle of a butterfly and asks students, “Which sequence words did I include? Why? Where did I use an exclamation? Where did I use a question? Why?” Students then return to their writing and make edits to ending punctuation, where needed.
Students have opportunities to write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Students have opportunities to spell simple words phonetically, drawing on knowledge of sound-letter relationships. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, in the foundational skills support section, the teacher reviews how to use known spelling patterns to sound out words while modeling.
In Unit 5, Lesson 19, the teacher models sounding out words while writing four sentences. The class discusses using the correct letter formation and sounding out words. Students revise their writing for proper letter formation and try to sound out words again. Lesson guidance states, “At this point, it is assumed that students have learned most of the sound-spelling correlations during the foundational skills block and are ready to begin using them in writing.”
In Unit 7, Lesson 18, the teacher reviews editing and printing letters correctly, and using capitalization, correct end punctuation, and sound-spelling patterns to sound out words. Students edit their writing for printing letters correctly, using correct capitalization, using correct end punctuation, using known sound-spelling patterns to sound out words, then students share their work with a partner.
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.
Instructional materials identify key vocabulary words and list them at the beginning of each unit and lesson throughout the year. Vocabulary words selected for each lesson include Tier I, II, and III words; however, there is no rationale as to how or why specific words were selected for the unit or lesson. The Teacher Tools section provides content and strategies necessary to support vocabulary instruction but there is not a coherent and cohesive instructional plan within daily lessons or threaded across lessons and units. During lessons, the teacher decides how to introduce vocabulary words and how students will engage with the words. Resources for vocabulary are primarily text-based, with few opportunities for students to interact with the words while speaking, listening and writing. The assessment of student grade level acquisition of vocabulary is not consistent, often reflects a few words, and does not align with the requirements of grade-level standards.
Materials provide some teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Instructional components for vocabulary are found in the Teacher Tool Section. Vocabulary words address text-dependent Tier I, II, and III words used in lessons.
The teacher can download a vocabulary package for each unit that contains a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Within each unit, a list of vocabulary words is located at the top of the lesson map. When the teacher accesses lesson plans, the vocabulary list along with definitions is visible. Additional vocabulary support within lessons includes word banks, sentence frames, word maps, games, and a visual glossary. Teacher Tools guidance suggests vocabulary instruction occurs daily for ten minutes or less using a routine that becomes familiar to students; however, the structure for these opportunities is rarely included in daily lessons. The end-of-unit vocabulary assessment provides student choice in determining which two words from the unit list to illustrate and define. Few vocabulary words are used across multiple units and lessons.
Vocabulary is sometimes repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 5, while reading The Crayon Box That Talked by Shane Derolf, the word unique is introduced; however, lesson guidance does not specify how to teach the word. The vocabulary word is not included in other lessons, but it is addressed during the unit assessment. Of the 16 vocabulary words suggested in the unit, six repeat in multiple lessons and five appear on the unit assessment.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, one of the vocabulary words is kite. The teacher introduces the book Kite Flying by Grace Lin, by talking about a family who builds a kite; however, the lesson plans do not include explicit directions for introducing the word. While reading, students answer questions about building a kite. After the story, students explain how the family worked together to build the kite. The teacher shares specific facts about kites and students look at different types of kites on the last two pages of the book. Although the vocabulary word was repeatedly used in the lesson, it does not repeat in any other lessons, nor were there other opportunities for students to use the word.
In Unit 8, Lesson 2, the vocabulary words from What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Jess French are dispose and reusable. The lesson plan does not provide instructional guidance; however, materials provide a vocabulary package for download, if the teacher chooses. During the lesson, the only vocabulary word that is introduced to students and used repeatedly is the word plastic.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary words; however, materials do not label vocabulary words as Tier 2 or 3. Academic vocabulary words, such as character are found in teacher questions but are not explicitly taught or defined. The word fiction is not used; instead, fiction texts are referred to as “made-up.”
In Unit 5, Lesson 2, while reading It’s Snowing by Gail Gibbons, students orally use the words droplets and evaporate to describe how ice crystals are formed. Students use these words again while writing in Lesson 3.
In Unit 7, Lesson 8, the word hatch from the text Frogs by Gail Gibbons is introduced. The lesson does not specify how a teacher should teach “hatch”. The word “hatch” is not included in the questions. The question says “break free” instead of “hatch”. Sentence frames say “comes out of” instead of “hatch”. “Hatch” is included in some questions and sample responses in other lessons, but it is never explicitly taught. “Hatch” is included in the unit assessment.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Materials are organized around themes and topics that integrate literature, science and social studies content. Most units build knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. Units that are organized around a topic provide multiple texts connected to the topic and allow a variety of opportunities for students to engage through repeated readings, lessons, class discussions, writing prompts, word cards, and the final assessment. Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts, and the questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions.
Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks.
Writing tasks build in complexity over the school year from simple sentence responses to multiple sentences used to support an opinion, inform or explain an event or topic. Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade level standards. Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction. Students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and tasks. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit. Instructional materials provide 150 days of lesson plans. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors. Materials do not include a foundational skills component.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
Materials are organized around themes and topics that integrate literature, science and social studies content. Most units build knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. At times, units are thematic in nature. Units that are organized around a topic provide multiple texts connected to the topic and allow a variety of opportunities for students to engage through repeated readings, lessons, class discussions, writing prompts, word cards, and the final assessment. Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts, and the questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions. Materials support students’ development of the analysis of knowledge and ideas. Text-based questions and tasks integrate knowledge and ideas over the course of the year using single and multiple texts. Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Most tasks allow students to demonstrate acquired knowledge of the unit topic. Each unit has at least one culminating task involving drawing and writing. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks. Over the course of the year, students learn how to use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose explanatory and opinion writing. Writing tasks build in complexity over the school year from simple sentence responses to multiple sentences used to support an opinion, inform or explain an event or topic. Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade level standards. Students are encouraged to use specific examples in research projects. Shared research projects are included to help develop students’ research skills. Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meets the criteria of Indicator 2a.
Materials are organized around themes and topics. Units integrate literature, science and social studies content. Most units build knowledge and the ability to read/listen to and comprehend texts. At times, units are thematic in nature. Units that are organized around a topic provide multiple texts connected to the topic and allow a variety of opportunities for students to engage through repeated readings, lessons, class discussions, writing prompts, word cards, and the final assessment. According to the authors, the purpose of the curriculum is to create a love of reading by using engaging texts and helping students identify reasons for reading in order to understand the world around them.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read/listen and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, texts are organized around the topic of “Falling in Love with Authors and Illustrators.” The materials state, “In this unit, students explore and experience the works of four award-winning authors and illustrators; Grace Lin, Yuyu Morales, Monica Brown, and Jerry Pinkney. Students learn about each author or illustrator’s life and his or her inspiration for becoming an author and/or illustrator. Students think critically and make connections between the author or illustrator’s life and the stories he or she writes or illustrates, and how each author’s unique personality is reflected in the words or pictures.”
Throughout the unit, students listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the topic. Texts include: Kite Flying by Grace Lin (Lesson 1); Dim Sum for Everyone! by Grace Lin (Lesson 2); Fortune Cookie Fortunes by Grace Lin (Lesson 3); The Ugly Vegetables by Grace Lin (Lesson 4); Dreamers by Yuyu Morales (Lesson 6)’ Nino Wrestles the World by Yuyu Morales (Lesson 7); Just a Minute: A Trickster Tale and Counting Book by Yuyi Morales (Lessons 8 and 9); Tito Puente, Mambo King by Monica Brown (Lesson 11); My Name is Celia: The Life of Celia Cruz by Monica Brown (Lesson 12); Pele, King of Soccer by Monica Brown (Lesson 13); My Name is Gabriela: The Life of Gabriela Mistral by Monica Brown (Lesson 14); The Lion and the Mouse by Jerry Pinkney (Lesson 16); The Tortoise and the Hare by Jerry Pinkney (Lesson 17); and The Grasshopper and the Ants by Jerry Pinkney (Lesson 18).
The Unit Prep section includes the Essential Question, “Where do authors and illustrators get their ideas for writing?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
“An author is a person who writes a story.”
An illustrator is a person who illustrates or draws pictures for a story.
A person can be both an author and an illustrator.
Authors use things they are passionate about in their own lives to influence what they write about.
Authors are often recognized for their understanding of writing or illustrations.
In Unit 8, texts are organized around the topic of “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.” The materials state, “Students learn about how to save the earth by reducing, reusing, and recycling. Students learn why waste is a problem, about the options for limiting waste, and read stories about different people from around the world who have found ways to reduce, reuse, and recycle waste.”
Throughout the unit, students listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the topic. Texts include: What a Waste: Trash, Recycling, and Protecting Our Planet by Jess French (Lessons 1–2, 4, 10); The Last Straw: Kids vs. Plastics by Susan Hood (Lessons 3, 9, 15); The Three R’s: Reuse, Reduce, Recycle by Nuria Roca (Lesson 5); Recycle! A Handbook for Kids by Gail Gibbons (Lesson 6); One Plastic Bag: Isotaou Ceesay and the Recycling Women of the Gambia by Miranda Paul (Lesson 7); Rainbow Weaver/Tejedora del Arcoiris by Linda Elovitz Marshall (Lesson 8); Compost Stew: An A to Z Recipe for the Earth by Mary McKenna Siddals (Lesson 11); Harlem Grown: How Obe Big Idea Transformed a Neighborhood by Tony Hillery (Lesson 12).
The Unit Prep section includes the following Essential Questions: “How does waste impact the environment? What steps can you take to create a healthy community and environment?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
“Waste is all of the things we throw away. Waste causes a lot of problems for people and the environment.
Plastic is a problem because it lasts forever. People throw plastic in the trash and it does not decompose. Plastic is in a lot of things, so there is a ton of plastic trash.
Reducing, reusing, and recycling are ways to limit waste.
To reduce the use of something means to use less of it.
To reuse something means to use it again.
To recycle something means to use it again to make new things.
People around the world have come up with different solutions for how to reduce, reuse, and recycle plastic and other forms of waste.”
Some texts in a unit are connected by a theme, as opposed to building knowledge on a topic. Examples include:
In Unit 1, texts are organized around the theme of “Welcome to School.” The materials state, “Students explore hopes and dreams, how to be polite and treat others with respect, and why it’s important to be proud of themselves and who they are. The unit gives students a chance to project their own feelings onto characters in order to make sense of how they are feeling.”
Throughout the unit, students listen to various texts read aloud that relate to the theme. Texts include Wemberly Worried by Keven Henkes (Lesson 1), The King of Kindergarten by Derrick Barnes (Lesson 2), I Like Myself! by Karen Beaumont (Lesson 3), I Am Every Good Thing by Derrick Barnes (Lesson 4), The Crayon Box That Talked by Shane Derolf (Lesson 5), Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman (Lesson 6), Ruthie and the (Not So) Teeny Lie by Laura Rankin (Lesson 7), Words Are Not for Hurting by Elizabeth Verdick (Lesson 8), Today I Feel Silly by Jamie Lee Curtis (Lesson 9), and You Hold me Up by Monique Gray Smith (Lesson 10).
The Unit Prep section includes the Essential Question, “How can you make your classroom community a joyful place to be?”
The Unit Prep section includes the following Content Knowledge and Connections:
“Being ready for school means that you are excited and ready to learn new things.
Every new school year brings new hopes and dreams for what you want; It is important to follow directions and listen at school.
Helpful words are words that make people feel good about themselves. Hurtful words are words that don’t make people feel good about themselves.
It is important to listen to what people tell you to do so that you know what you should be doing.
We are all different. We should value our differences. They make us special.
We all have different feelings. It is okay to have different feelings.”
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.
Materials provide opportunities to analyze sequences of questions and tasks within and across multiple literary and informational texts. Questions are sequenced in ways that prepare students with background knowledge in order to deepen content knowledge, draw conclusions, and support their opinions. With prompting and support, teacher questions require students to recall and retell information, formulate opinions and make inferences. Opportunities to analyze craft and structure focus on asking and answering questions about unknown words in a text. Students do not have opportunities to recognize different text types or identify the author and illustrator of a book.
For most texts (read-aloud texts K–1 and anchor texts Grade 2), students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 6, through discussions, drawing, and writing, students retell what happens at the beginning, middle, and end of the story, A Napping House by Audrey Wood.
In Unit 4, Lesson 1, students use details and main events from the story, Kite Flying by Grace Lin to explain how a family works together to build a kite. Students retell the story using the transition words first, then, next, and last.
In Unit 7, Lesson 16, students retell what happens at each stage of a bird’s life cycle using two to three details for each stage from the text, A Nest Full of Eggs by Priscilla Belz.
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 8, students define the words “helpful” and “hurtful” and answer questions about helpful and hurtful words during the read-aloud of Words Are Not for Hurting by Elizabeth Verdick. Students work as a team to sort words into the categories, helpful and hurtful.
In Unit 6, Lesson 9, during the Close Read of Rosa by Nikki Giovanni, students answer the following questions: “What words does the author use to describe how the bus driver talks to Rosa? What does this show about him? What words does the author use to describe how Rosa talks to the bus driver? What does this show about her?”
In Unit 8, Lesson 3, during the read-aloud The Last Straw: Kids vs. Plastics by Susan Hood, students analyze the last lines of the poem to decide if plastic is a “blessing” or a “curse.”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2c.
Materials support students’ development of the analysis of knowledge and ideas. Text-based questions and tasks integrate knowledge and ideas over the course of the year using single and multiple texts. Students use information from read-alouds, class discussions, and illustrations to answer questions and complete tasks. Sequential questions and tasks support the growth of ideas and knowledge and prepare students for the completion of the culminating task.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 2, students listen to Jump, Frog, Jump! by Robert Kalan. Students respond to questions, such as “How do the illustrations help the reader predict what is going to happen next?” “What happened next?” What happened in the end?”
In Unit 5, Lesson 12, during the reading of Wild Tracks! A Guide to Nature’s Footprints by Jim Arnosky, students examine the illustrations and discuss the differences between walking and running deer tracks. Students then use the text and illustrations to respond to the following question: “What can you learn from looking at deer tracks? Give two to three specific facts.”
In Unit 6, Lesson 1, All Are Welcome by Alexandra Penfold, students use the text and illustrations to answer “The author says, “All are welcome here.” What types of diversity do you see in the illustration?”. Students are prompted “to notice the different races, physical abilities, religions, gender, and ages.” Then students answer “What does the author mean that “All are Welcome?” Give two examples.”
Most sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Lessons 6–7, students learn about what obstacles are and ways that you can overcome them. After listening to Dreamers by Yuyi Morales in Lesson 6, students respond to questions about what challenges Yuyi and her son had when they immigrated to the United States and how they overcame them. In Lesson 7, students explain what the main character learns about overcoming obstacles in the book, Nino Wrestles the World by Yuyi Morales.
In Unit 7, Lesson 17, students Turn and Talk about the stages in a chicken’s life cycle using the three books they read about bird life cycles. Students respond to questions such as, “ Which book gave the most information about a bird’s life cycle? Why?”; “Which book gave the least information about a bird’s life cycle? Why?”; and “How were A Nest Full of Eggs and From Egg to Chicken similar?”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit’s topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2d.
Materials provide several culminating tasks that integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Most tasks allow students to demonstrate acquired knowledge of the unit topic. Each unit has at least one culminating task involving drawing and writing. Units contain coherently sequenced questions and tasks that lead to the culminating tasks. Students gain knowledge from the unit to create artifacts of their learning, such as detailed illustrations, a written letter, and a narrative story. Teachers monitor student learning throughout the year using Writing Rubrics. The culminating tasks are used as formative assessments before the Unit Summative Assessment.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, after listening to nine books and discussing patterns found in the stories, students orally share with the class which book was their favorite and why. The class participates in a Shared Writing activity in which the teacher models drawing and writing about a favorite book using details in the drawing to explain why the book is a favorite. Students draw and write independently about which book from the unit is their favorite. Students share their ideas with partners.
In Unit 5, Lesson 14, after listening to seven books about what animals do in winter, students participate in a class discussion of what they learned so far about animals in winter. Students discuss what animals do and why with partners and with the class. Students participate in a Shared Writing activity in which the teacher models writing about what animals do in winter. Students write independently about what animals do in winter and include specific details and two vocabulary words from the unit. Students share their ideas with partners.
In Unit 7, Lesson 7, over the course of three days students write a story about a seed that travels from one place to another, including what type of seed it is, how the seed travels, and what happens to the seed in the spring. Students begin with a brainstorming using the narrative writing brainstorm graphic organizer. Students use their brainstorming to write a first draft making sure they include specific details in their illustrations and text, content from the unit, and different sentence types. Students revise and edit their stories and share them with a partner.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.
Over the course of the year, students learn how to use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose explanatory and opinion writing. Writing tasks build in complexity over the school year from simple sentence responses to multiple sentences used to support an opinion, inform or explain an event or topic. Students use both writing and drawing to illustrate their ideas. Materials include rubrics, and sentence strand supports in the Enhanced Lessons section that accompany each lesson. Rubrics for opinion, narrative, and informative writing are clearly articulated.
Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include six lessons on opinion writing, nine lessons on informational writing, and four lessons on narrative writing.
In Unit 2, students are introduced to an instructional sequence in which students orally retell the story and write and or draw the beginning, middle and end while teachers circulate and prompt students to add details.
In Unit 3, students explore topics of fall weather, harvests, and growing seeds. Students learn skills such as how to name the topic they are writing about, and how to use a combination of drawing and labeling to inform the reader about their topic. Students write about the fall by drawing and adding details to their drawings that explain key facts from the unit texts.
In Unit 5, students explore how animals survive the winter. Students learn how to create different types of simple sentences orally and in writing and stories with a beginning, middle and an end. Students learn how to ask questions using “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” “why,” and “how” and how words can help a reader visualize the story. Students also learn how to begin a sentence with a capital letter and end with correct punctuation.
In Unit 6, students produce an informational piece of writing about what they would do to be a King using lessons learned from their reading. Students use an Anchor chart from the previous day. The Teacher models using details to support their answers stressing the point that examples help readers understand the main point. The teacher also models using drawing to illustrate ideas and details. Teachers uses The K Writing Rubric for informational writing to assess students’ writing.
In Unit 8, students write an informational book to explain and illustrate each of the three R’s using explicit details and facts in their writing and drawings, transition words, and exclamatory notations. Teachers are guided to circulate, prompting students for more details, labeling, or if there are places an exclamatory statement or example could be used. Teachers model a non-exemplar piece of writing and as a class determine what could be added. Students edit for capital letters, punctuation, complete sentences and spelling using the Grade K Editing Checklist.
Instructional materials include well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, the focus is Noticing Patterns in Stories. Teacher guidance is found in the Enhanced Lesson section of each lesson. Student supports include a graphic organizer, Narrative Brainstorm Organizer to organize their ideas. Students write an opinion about their favorite book. Two sentence stems are provided and lesson guidance suggests the teacher asks students what they are writing and record this dictation.
In Unit 4, Lesson 19, materials provide an Objective, Target Task, and Sample Response. Teacher guidance includes Building Background and Engagement, Shared Writing, and Independent Writing. Materials include Writing Rubrics for progress monitoring and a list of items the teacher should look for when observing students during the writing process along with matching suggested phrases the teacher can say as a support measure.
In Unit 8, Lesson 16, students create a plan for eliminating waste and explain why their plan is the best. The teacher brainstorms with the class either a class plan or ways that individuals can create a plan and discuss what needs to be done to implement the plan. Teachers provide a potential model and ask the students, “How do I show what I am feeling? How do I show that I think this is the best solution for me?” Materials provide four sentence stems to support students’ work.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students’ knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2f.
Research tasks are embedded within each unit and include a progression of skills, building to mastery of grade level standards. Students are encouraged to use specific examples in research projects. Shared research projects are included to help develop students’ research skills. Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 10, the teacher prepares students to write about everything they have learned about what happens to leaves in the fall. The teacher has students turn and talk to orally retell what happens to leaves in the fall, explaining key facts. The teacher encourages students to use content specific words including leaves, wind, chlorophyll, sugar/pigments/sunlight, and weather. The class reviews together and the teacher models drawing a picture that can explain what happens to leaves in the fall, including as many details as possible. The teacher thinks aloud about each detail and adds labels to identify different parts of the picture. Students then write their own text about what happens to leaves in the fall.
In Unit 5, Lesson 14, the teacher prepares students to write about what they have learned about what animals do during the winter. Students share examples of what animals do during the winter using the word “because” in their answers. The teacher models writing an answer to the question, “What do animals do during the winter?” Students write an answer to the question on their own and are encouraged to use at least two key vocabulary words from their unit.
In Unit 8, Lesson 14, the teacher prepares students to write an informational book to teach their families about the Three R’s (reduce, reuse, recycle). The teacher models writing a paragraph about one of the Three R’s, explaining to the class that the goal of the paragraph is to teach others so they should include specific details. The teacher models drawing a detailed illustration that “includes details about the topic” and labeling the key parts of the drawing. Students write their own paragraph about one of the Three R’s.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 10, the materials include additional supports indicating that the teacher can display all of the anchor charts from the first part of the unit and have students use the anchor charts as visual reminders for what happens to leaves in the fall. The materials also suggest that the teacher should model sounding out words to spell when labeling the picture for additional foundational skills support. Opportunities for enrichment are noted including having students try and write about what happens to leaves in the fall underneath their picture.
In Unit 8, Lesson 16, the materials include a sample response for teachers to use when writing about a plan about how to limit waste. Potential options for plans and potential written response models are included in the materials. The materials also suggest providing students with sentence frames for additional language support. Progress monitoring supports include Grade K writing rubrics that can be used to analyze student work.
Materials include shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 10, after reading texts about fall and leaves including Autumn Leaves by Ken Robbins, Leaf Man by Lois Ehlert, Leaves by David Ezra Stine, and We’re Going on a Leaf Hunt by Steve Metzger, students create an informative poster and write a paragraph about fall leaves. The teacher models a Think Aloud to help students add additional text- based facts and details.
In Unit 4, Lesson 15, after reading multiple books by Monica Brown, students write and illustrate a letter to the author explaining which was their favorite and why.
In Unit 8, Lesson 13, after reading eight texts, students participate in a Shared Writing activity, during which they create an ABC poem of things that can be reduced, reused, or recycled. Students recall information from previous lessons to write about the objects for their assigned letter. The teacher collects each piece of work to create a final class poem.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction. Students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and tasks. Students have opportunities in each lesson to use a partner Turn and Talk and engage in open whole group discussions that involve the diverse views of all students, and the materials provide ample questions for teachers to ask students and students to answer. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit. Instructional materials provide 150 days of lesson plans. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors. The Building Deeper Meaning section in the lesson suggests allotting 30 minutes to introduce the lesson, model expectations, discuss content, and write about the Target Task. Materials do not include a foundational skills component.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.
Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials employ teacher modeling during instruction. Students often respond to and complete standards-aligned questions and tasks. Students have opportunities in each lesson to use a partner Turn and Talk and engage in open whole group discussions that involve the diverse views of all students. The materials provide ample questions for teachers to ask students and students to answer. Assessments leverage knowledge from the unit.
Over the course of each unit, instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: .
In Unit 2, Lesson 1, while listening to The Very Busy Spider by Eric Carle, the teacher explains that students are “going to think about what happens in the beginning, middle, and end of the story.” While reading, the teacher asks questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the story.
In Unit 4, Lesson 17, the teacher introduces the story, The Tortoise & the Hare by Jerry Pinkney and tells students, “we will look for clues from the illustrations to help us figure out what happens in the beginning, middle, and end.” After reading the story, the teacher guide says, “Review with students what is included in a strong retell. Remind them that a retell includes the key details from the beginning, middle, and end of the story.” This instruction aligns to RL.K.2: With prompting and support, retell familiar stories, including key details.
In Unit 6, Lesson 6, The Other Side by Jacqueline Woodson, the teacher explains the vocabulary word segregation.”Today, we are going to start learning about a time in our country’s history where everything was segregated, or kept apart, by race, especially in the South. Black Americans could not drink from the same drinking fountains as white people, attend the same schools, or enjoy the same public areas. Everything was separate. This was known as segregation.” This instruction aligns to L.K.4, one of the supporting standards listed for the lesson.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Lesson 11, during the introduction of Fall Harvests: Bringing in Food by Martha E. H. Rustad, the teacher says, “So far, we have learned a lot about the way that trees and leaves change in the fall. Today, we are going to read about another important part of fall, fall harvests. This book is called Fall Harvests, Bringing in Food by Martha E. H. Rustard and illustrated by Amanda Enright. Let us look at the cover of the book. Based on the title and the illustration on the front of the book, what do you think a harvest is? What questions do you have about harvests?” Students answer questions about key details during the read aloud such as, “What types of food do people harvest in the fall? Give two examples.”
In Unit 6, Lesson 6, during the Target Task for The Other Side by Jacqueline Woodson, students orally retell the story when answering the question, “What happened in The Other Side?” The teacher prompts students by asking several questions such as, “The little girls, Clover and Annie, were not supposed to go to the other side of the fence and play with each other. Why do you think that was? How did race impact the way the girls felt about each other? How do you know? What rules did the girls have to follow? How did they feel about the rules? What can we learn from the girls?” This aligns to the core standard, RL.K.2.
In Unit 7, Lesson 4, students listen to From Seed to Sunflower by Gerald Legg. The Key Questions focus on students identifying key details in the text and answering questions about unknown words. Key Questions include, “What happens to sunflower seeds every autumn and winter?”; “What is germination?”; “What happens after the seed germinates?”; “How does the seed continue to change?”; and “What is pollination? Why is it important?” This aligns to the supporting standard, RI.K.1.
Over the course of each unit, assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Content Assessment, during Questions 3–4, students “Pick one story from the unit. Retell what happened in the story.” The assessment items include a graphic organizer with boxes labeled Beginning, Middle, End for students to draw a picture of each part of the story, as well as lines underneath the boxes for students to write words about each part of the story. The assessment item lists RL.K.1 RL.K.2, RL.K.3, W.K.1, L.K.1 as standards assessed.
In Unit 7, Content Assessment, during Questions 3–4, students respond to a writing prompt: “Pick one life cycle that you learned about in the unit. Tell what happens at each stage of the life cycle.” The assessment lists RI.K.2, RI.K.3, W.K.2, W.K.8, L.K.1, L.K.2, L.K.6 as standards assessed.
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students answer questions about words with -ful suffixes such as helpful and hurtful. In Unit 1, students also discuss descriptive words found in the texts such as magnificent and brilliant. In Unit 3, students discuss the meaning of descriptive words to tell how leaves are different such as shiny/dull, narrow/wide, jagged/smooth. In Unit 5, students describe differences between wild and tame animals and explain what snarling means in the text. In Unit 8, students determine if plastic is a blessing or a curse. This content aligns to L.K.4b.
In Unit 2, students answer questions about the beginning, middle, and end of The Very Busy Spider by Eric Carle. Later In Unit 2, students retell the events of Sitting Down to Eat by Bill Harley. In Unit 4, students retell the events of The Tortoise & the Hare by Jerry Pinkney. In Unit 6, students retell The Other Side by Jacqueline Woodson and discuss reasons for character’s actions and the lesson in the story. This content aligns to RL.K.2.
In Unit 3, students identify key details about the season of Fall. In Unit 4, students retell key details about people's lives from biographies. In Unit 7, students retell the stages of various animal life cycles. This content aligns to RI.K.2.
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.
Instructional materials provide 150 days of lesson plans. Lessons are structured as suggested frameworks to support the core and supporting English Language Arts standards selected by the curriculum authors. The Building Deeper Meaning section in the lesson suggests allotting 30 minutes to introduce the lesson, model expectations, discuss content, and write about the Target Task. Materials do not include a foundational skills component. The implementation schedule allots 60 minutes for ELA instruction and 15–20 minutes for independent reading. Scheduling an additional 45-minute block for foundational skills instruction may not be feasible.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
A daily reading lesson consists of Building Background and Engagement (5 minutes) during which the teacher introduces the book and/or topic; Engaging with the Text (25 minutes) during which the teacher reads the text and asks discussion questions; and Building Deeper Meaning (30 minutes) during which the teacher explains the lesson and Target Task. During the Building Deeper Meaning component of the lesson, students respond to the Target Task often during a discussion and through writing/drawing.
Writing lessons have a longer Background and Engagement (10–15 minutes) component, followed by Shared Writing (20 minutes) during which the class works together on a model response, and Independent Writing (30 minutes) during which students share if time permits.
Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Pacing Guide notes, “Our Kindergarten curriculum does not include a comprehensive foundational skills block. To ensure students master all grade-level standards, you will need to implement a highly-rated structured phonics program alongside these units.”
The Pacing Guide includes a sample schedule that allots a 60-minute block for ELA instruction, a 15–20 minute block for Independent Reading, and a 45-minute block for Foundational Skills. Given the time demands allotted for integrated lesson content and independent reading, an additional 45-minute block for foundational skills instruction may not be feasible.
The Pacing Guide states, “Our Kindergarten units span 145 days. We intentionally did not account for all 180 school days to allow teachers to fit in additional review or extension, teacher-created assessments, and school-based events. Each unit includes a specific number of lessons, including writing and discussion lessons, and a day for assessment.”
Materials include eight Units with 136 lessons taught over 150 days, leaving approximately 30 days for other school or classroom needs.
Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level in both regular content and assessments. There are various types of assessments in the program, including unit content assessments, formative and summative assessments. While an answer key is provided for all assessments, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key. The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. Materials include general support throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students. Still, the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson, as the variation of the structure in lessons is limited. The program does not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. The materials also include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson for teacher use. Materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities. The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. In each unit, links in the Enhanced Lesson Plan allow teachers to download student materials for use in the lessons. These materials include a vocabulary package and the option to turn the Target Task into student handouts. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes specific suggestions for how to incorporate materials within the lesson plan, including when to stop and ask questions. Each lesson contains one or more objectives for students to meet and a list of core and supporting Common Core Standards covered in the lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
A Unit Launch is included in each unit to help the teacher understand the unit. The Unit Launch includes five steps including, Introduction, Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Working Toward Mastery.
Lessons offer guidance for teachers to support all students by Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and providing additional questions teachers can ask students to support them with the Key Questions.
Each non-writing lesson includes a five-minute Building Background and Engagement section to introduce the book and provide the necessary background knowledge.
Each Unit Summary includes a comprehensive list of the vocabulary for the unit Teachers also have access to the vocabulary package that includes a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Each lesson also includes Google Slides that contain the lesson’s vocabulary word and an image that corresponds.
In the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, the goal is to “build [teachers] understanding of how students might experience the core texts based on these interconnected aspects of text complexity.” In Unit 6 for example, there are What Makes the Text Complex and Your Students and These Texts subsections that are specific to the unit.
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the materials offer guidance that highlights the content knowledge and connections for each unit. Within the unit, lessons provide sufficient and useful suggestions such as giving students sentence stems for the Building Deeper Meaning section. For example, in Lesson 4, the sentence stems, “I am...” are used to help students write about what they are and the things that make them special like the boy in the story.
In Unit 3, Lesson 1, the Building Background Engagement section includes background knowledge about fall. This supports the learning objective of brainstorming one or two questions about fall by asking and answering questions about details from a discussion.
In Unit 4, Lesson 11, students listen to Tito Puente, Mambo King by Monica Brown, which is read to the students in both Spanish and English. There are several language supports to help engage the students with bilingual books such as picking out a few key words in Spanish to introduce and practice with students.
In Unit 7, Lesson 14, students write a book about each stage in a butterfly’s life cycle. To support students with this writing task, the materials suggest providing students with a list of sequence words that they can use in their writing and encouraging students to use the class anchor charts from the previous lessons.
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade K partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials include limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. Each unit provides a Unit Prep section that includes some additional contextual background, but it does not provide support in teaching grade-level concepts within the lesson plans. Explanations are included in the Teacher Tools of different aspects of the curriculum and teaching techniques or different strategies related to knowledge demands of each unit, but they are not lesson- or text-specific. The explanations of the concepts are specific to the approaches taken by the materials and do not provide any additional opportunity for teachers to expand their understanding of a concept.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, there are multiple sections that present specific information on how to prepare the unit, internalize a unit, and understand the different components of an ELA lesson.
In the Teacher Tools, Writing, there are specific full-length explanations of Learning to Write and Writing to Learn.
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, there are explanations of Intellectually Preparing a Unit, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Scaffolds for English Learners, Engineering Texts, Oral Language Protocols, and Using Graphic Organizers as Scaffolds.
In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, there are explanations of Categories to Progress Monitor, Types of Assessment for Progress Monitoring including Formative Assessments and Summative Assessments.
In the Vocabulary section of the Teacher Tools, there is an explanation of how the vocabulary is built into the unis and an explanation of how students build vocabulary through interacting with Tier II and Tier III words. There is then an in-depth explanation of how to teach the words within the text. There are no specific examples or modeling provided. There is further instruction for teachers in how to teach vocabulary through both an implicit and explicit approach with guidelines and strategies but no specific examples or modeling.
In the Teacher Tools, Providing Access to Complex Texts section, there are detailed explanations of what makes a text complex and how to provide access and support for more complex texts being used by students.
In Teacher Tools, Routines for Active Reading, there is an explanation of what active reading is and then more in-depth explanations of various forms of active reading, including Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading, and Independent Reading.
In the Unit Launch section, the teacher is provided with an opportunity to internalize the essential questions of the unit. The teacher is provided with opportunities to explore the questions as well as sample answers to the questions. In the section “Considering Who and Where You Are,” the teacher is given an opportunity to reflect on biases or gaps in knowledge that might impact the teaching of the unit.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Launch for each unit contains intellectual prep for the teacher, providing materials for the teacher to be prepared to teach the unit. The unit launch includes “a series of short video, targeted readings, and opportunities for action planning.” The Unit Launch for each of the units consists of four sections: Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Working Toward Mastery. The online platform includes places for responses to be recorded and a Unit Launch Note Taker (K-2nd grade) is also included. For example, in Unit 6: What is Justice? the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, helps the teacher to examine the texts and understand the complexity and examine how the texts may or may not connect to your students’ lives. The launch then examines the Unit Essential Content, focusing on the Essential Questions and potential answers to these questions by students. The Launch also includes Key Reading Standards, with questions to build meaning of the text; however, these focus on helping students to understand the texts and tasks of the unit, not learning beyond the focus of this unit. Working Towards Mastery focuses on preparing the teacher for what students need to know and be able to do in order to answer the reflection questions. No additional resources were provided to allow teachers to improve their own knowledge on the subject.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Standards Map for Kindergarten English Language Arts identifies the core and supporting standards for each unit. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
For each unit, the Lesson Map table includes a list of addressed standards. At the beginning of each unit in the Unit Prep, there is also a section titled Common Core Standards, where the core and supporting standards are listed.
The end of each lesson in every unit includes a list of Common Core Standards and Supporting Standards, which are defined as “Standards that are practiced daily but are not priority standards for the unit.” All are hyperlinked to a pop-up window with the full text of the standard. For example, in Unit 5, Lesson 5, materials list Common Core Standards RL.K.2, RL.K.3, SL.K.1, and SL.K.6. Supporting standards listed include L.K.1d, RL.K.1, RL.K.7, and RL.K.10.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Launch section of the curriculum includes an explanation for the key reading standards. The teacher works through unpacking the key understandings of the unit by answering questions concerning the standard and how it connects to the unit. Questions include, “What concrete information will students need to know in order to access this Key Understanding?” Teachers can also view the publisher’s response to the question. The next step is “Working Toward Mastery” where the teacher reflects on the skills and knowledge that students must develop to successfully answer the target tasks.
The Unit Launch for each unit includes a section entitled Unit Essential Content. Guidance notes, “The goal of this section is for you to review and fully understand the key content knowledge of a unit prior to teaching. Doing this work prior to teaching the unit will help you ensure that students internalize the key content knowledge by the end of the unit.”
In the Unit Essential Content section, materials describe Key Reading Standards.
“For each unit, we have identified a few core reading standards, and broken them down into Key Understandings. Key Understandings are what students need to know and understand about the core standards in order to build meaning. These Key Understandings should never be taught in isolation; they are meant to be used to deepen understanding of the texts and content”.
For each key understanding, teachers reflect on the concrete information students need to know in order to access the Key Understanding and how the understanding will support students with the texts and tasks of the unit.
The Unit Prep for each unit includes a reading focus area, a writing focus area, and a speaking and listening focus area. At times, materials tag these areas to specific standards.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. Materials provide limited information to guide teachers relating to the content covered in each unit or lesson. Materials do not include information on how parents or caregivers can help students succeed in the program.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program and include an annotated bibliography that references the research-based strategies. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. Materials provide a concise explanation of each ELA component and explain how the program is designed to teach the components to accomplish the stated goals.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Tools provides an explanation of how the materials approach each ELA component:
In Writing, Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction, the explanation states: “Language and writing instruction are embedded within all Fishtank ELA units from K-12. Language instruction is a powerful tool to help students understand the decisions authors make and how they impact the effect their writing has on readers. Learning grammar and mechanics is about studying the intentional decisions authors make, noticing the power of different punctuation, sentence structures, and craft choices, and then trying out those strategies in their own writing. When learning different grammatical structures students zoom in on sentences to notice the connection between mechanics, craft, style, and meaning. Language instruction isn’t separate from reading instruction, because the connection between language and the author’s craft is integral. Because language instruction is so deeply connected to reading instruction, it should not be taught in isolation. And as far back as 1936, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) found that formal teaching of grammar and mechanics had little effect on students’ writing and even had deleterious effects on student writing when it displaced writing time. Instead, language instruction should be organically embedded into all aspects of reading and writing so that students can authentically grapple with and understand how different structures impact meaning.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, Interactive Read Aloud, the explanation states: “We use the word interactive because kids should be doing some of the heavy comprehension work during the reading aloud, the teacher shouldn’t be doing all the work.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, the explanation states that the goal of the curriculum is to build independent and strategic learners. The approach is explained as providing students with multiple opportunities to interact with a wide variety of texts independently with the goal of having students read the core texts independently with little support.
In Vocabulary, the explanation states: “Vocabulary development is intentionally built within all Fishtank ELA units. Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic. Throughout the unit, students have multiple opportunities to engage with words orally or in writing. Depending on the word, vocabulary words are taught both directly or indirectly. Fishtank ELA does not rely on a single vocabulary instructional method, rather instruction happens strategically within units so that students learn vocabulary indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines.”
In Writing, the explanation states: “Fishtank ELA includes opportunities for students to both learn to write and write to learn. Students will be immersed in reading, writing, discourse, and idea generation cycles in each unit. There is no separate writing block and no separate writing curriculum; all writing instruction is embedded directly into lessons and units. Through embedded on-demand and process-writing assignments, students build powerful, evidence-based arguments and develop their voice in a variety of genres. Because students need solid knowledge and understanding of a subject matter to write, all Fishtank ELA writing assignments are connected to a core text, or ask students to write about content knowledge from the unit, ensuring that all students have equal access to the assignment.”
In the Fishtank guiding principles, materials state: “In Literature units from Kindergarten through 8th grade, students read texts that explore themes applicable to their lives while also building knowledge of historical events and time periods. Most of the literature units focus on developing identity, diversity, justice, and activism, which are key components of Learning for Justice’s Social Justice Standards. The content of all of our K–8 units, both Literature and Science & Social Studies, aim to provide students with windows and mirrors to ensure students see their own identities, experiences, and motivations in texts (mirrors), alongside texts that allow students to gain insight and build empathy for the identities, experiences, and motivations of others (windows) (Style, 1996). And, wherever possible our units aim to engage students in discussions of current events. We also frequently update our units to incorporate articles and discussion topics that reflect current issues in the world around them.”
The Fishtank guiding principles also include the following reference: “Rather than organizing lessons around specific skills (e.g., how to find the main idea) and teaching these skills in isolation, we organize our curriculum around carefully-selected texts that will engage students and facilitate deep thinking and strategy development. The text, and the demands of the text, drive the focus of a particular unit or lesson. Text-dependent questions in each lesson are sequenced in order to build a deeper understanding of the key ideas and themes presented by the text. Units across the curriculum require students to read a combination of longer texts to build stamina and engage in discussions about the full text, as well as close readings of specific passages or excerpts. Text-dependent questions and close readings push students to pay close attention to the author's craft and text structure, word choice, and challenging vocabulary and syntax (Coleman and Pimentel, 2012). All grade-level Common Core Standards are carefully woven into the units and lessons, introduced and reinforced through text-dependent questions and close reading moments, and work in service of deep understanding of the text.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Writing, bibliographic references to multiple sources used in the development of their program include:
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin
Writing for Understanding: Using Backwards design to help all students write effectively by J. Hawkins, E. Ginty, K. LeClaire Kurzman, D. Leddy, and J. Miller
The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades by Judith C. Hochman and Natalie Wexler
In Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, bibliographic references to multiple research sources in the development of their program include:
Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Prompting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students by Z. Hammond
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by J. Zwiers and M. Crawford
Common Core Standards in Diverse Classrooms: Essential Practices for Developing Academic Language and Disciplinary Literacy by J. Zwiers, S. O’Hara, and R. Pritchard
In Teacher Tools, Text Selection, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
“Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy,” by Gloria Ladson-Billings
Why Knowledge Matters by E.D. Hirsch, Jr.
Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework and Historically Responsive Literary, Gholdy Muhammad, and “Curriculum as Window and Mirror” by Emily Style
In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines: Close Reading, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading by K. Beers and R.E. Probst
Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading by D. Fischer and N. Frey
Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--and Life by C. Lehman and K. Roberts
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners: Scaffolds for English Learners, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include “Essential Actions: A Handbook for Implementing WIDA’s Framework for English Language Development Standards” by Margo Gottlieb
In Teacher Tools, Vocabulary, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction by Isabel Beck and Common Core Appendix A.
In Teacher Tools, the explanations of the Match Fishtank approach to writing, vocabulary development, and language and grammar instruction are followed by “resources referenced in the development of” each section.
Additional reference sections include Qualitative Complexity of Fiction Texts, Providing Supports for Text Complexity, How Texts are Selected in the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Close Reading, and Foundational Skills.
The Foundational Skills section and its subsections entitled Teaching Reading Fluency and Assessing Reading Fluency, as well as the subsections of Academic Discourse entitled Types of Academic Discourse and Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Subsections of Supporting English Learners entitled Scaffolds for English Learners and Oral Language Protocols, and the subsection of Progress Monitoring and Assessment entitled Formative Assessments include embedded footnotes with references.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit plan contains a list of the texts being read throughout the unit with hyperlinks to the texts (either for reading or for purchase).
Each lesson folder contains all the handouts students will need for the lesson.
For example, for Unit 1, lesson 1, the lesson folder contains a handout for the target task.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standard and practices for the grade level. Each section of the assessment lists the standards addressed, and each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards each assessment question addresses. The materials provide an answer key for each assessment in the program with the corresponding assessed standards. While an answer key is provided, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. In addition, the materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standard and practices for the grade level. Each section of the assessment lists the standards addressed, and each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards each assessment question addresses.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains an assessment that addresses the content covered during the unit. Each section of the assessment, such as Vocabulary or Writing about Reading, identifies the standards assessed. The answer key document includes a table that contains an answer key and the standards that each assessment question addresses.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade K partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials include limited opportunities to determine students’ learning and insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key that is provided. Most support occurs through a handout that contains protocols and probing questions for students.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and some guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains one formal assessment that covers the content from the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, the Progress Monitoring and Assessments section includes a data analysis protocol. Materials provide probing questions for teachers to use to assist in discussing the assessment. Categories covered in this protocol include Unit Preparation, Lesson Preparation, Lesson Execution, and Progress Monitoring.
In the Teacher Tools, the Summative Assessments section contains the Data Meeting Protocol Guide, which includes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a Data Meeting. The guide has two parts. Part 1 explains how to use data to identify strengths and growth areas; Part 2 explains how to use data to reflect and plan next steps.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and limited suggestions to teachers for following-up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Formative Assessments section provides information regarding the use of formative assessments to progress monitor the different components of ELA instruction. This section includes:
The use of Key Questions to check for understanding;
Target Tasks to monitor reading comprehension, content knowledge, writing or oral language development;
Exit Tickets to quickly check student understanding; writing assignments to monitor writing, content knowledge and vocabulary, or reading comprehension;
discussion opportunities for academic discourse to monitor reading comprehension, oral language development, and content knowledge and vocabulary; and
fluency, both self-assessment and peer-assessed.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. Each unit contains both a Content Assessment that “pushes students to synthesize unit content knowledge, vocabulary, and/or the unit essential questions in writing” and a Cold Read Assessment, which also assesses unit standards. Educators can give one or both of the assessments. In addition, students write daily about the text they read or listen to. Materials provide a rubric to assess formal writing. The rubric addresses the grade-level standards aligned to the formal writing task, including standards that address language, conventions, and elaboration.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, the Content Assessment covers various standards in multiple tasks. Students pick two of the vocabulary words from the unit and draw a picture that shows what the word means. Then students answer the question, “What makes fall special?” by both drawing a picture and responding in writing, which addresses reading, writing, and language standards. The Cold Read Assessment asks questions about a text, in which students both draw a picture and answer in writing. Questions include, “How does a pumpkin grow?” and “What did you learn about pumpkin size?”
In Unit 7, the Content Assessment covers various standards in multiple tasks. Students begin by picking two of the vocabulary words and drawing a picture or writing a sentence that shows what the word means. Then students pick one of the life cycles that they learned about and tell what happens at each stage of the life cycle. The Cold Read Assessment asks questions after students read a text, which include, “What is the first step in the bullfrog’s life cycle?” and “Name one thing that is similar between this text and From Tadpole to Frog.”
Examples of formative assessment types include:
In Unit 4, Lesson 6, students engage in “a discussion of the challenge Yuji and her son faced when they came to the United States.” After discussing the challenges she faced, students answer the questions, “What did she (the author) want readers to learn? What message is she trying to share?” Finally, students “write about how Yuyi overcame the challenges she faced in the United States or what message Yuyi is trying to share with her readers.” The teacher circulates to ensure students are using correct letter formation, punctuation, and capitalization.
In Unit 6, Lesson 3, students discuss what the author Sheila Hamanaka means when she said “children come in all colors of the earth?”.After listening to All the Colors of the Earth, students respond to the question in writing and create a self-portrait of themselves. The teacher also encourages students to write “what color their skin is using one of the words that they learned from the text.”
In Unit 8, Lesson 15, materials provide four questions for teacher use while the class reads The Last Straw: Kids vs. Plastics by Susan Hood. Questions include, “What is the poem about?” and “What does the poet say you can do to join the crew?”
Examples of summative assessment types include:
In Unit 1, Lesson 12 students complete the Content Assessment (RL.K.4, L.K.1, L.K.2 L.K.6, W.K.1).
In Unit 3, Lesson 15, students write an informational text to teach a reader about pumpkins or apples in the fall. Materials provide a rubric to score the writing and the writing task addresses many standards including L.K.1, L.K.6, W.K.2, and W.K.7.
In Unit 5, Lesson 19, students complete the Content Assessment (R.I.K.1, RI.K.2, RI, K.3, R.I.K.4, R.I.K.7, L.K.5, L.K.6, W.K.2, W.K.8, L.K.1, L.K.2).
In Unit 7, Lesson 22, students complete the Cold Read Assessment which addresses standards RI.K.1, RI.K.2, RI.K.3, RI.K.9, and RI.K.10.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. The assessments are not designed so students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. To make the tests more accessible, such as text-to-speech or increasing the font size, teachers must download and edit the assessments.
Materials do not offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments are digital and housed on the website. Although assessments could be altered before printing, it would involve reformatting the answers.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
Materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. While the materials include suggestions on how materials can be scaffolded for multi-lingual learners or for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, these suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of these scaffolds to the teacher. The materials do include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. Throughout the program, there is limited variation in structure. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students, but the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson. The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. Lesson plans contain Supporting All Students boxes, which include Additional Supports, Language Supports, Building Background Knowledge and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and Opportunities for Enrichment strategies designed to help students meet or exceed grade-level standards when working with grade-level content; however, teachers will need to determine which supports to utilize, specifically for special populations.
Materials provide some strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 8, the materials provide eight different opportunities for the teacher to support students through the Supporting All Students sections. For example, one of the supports has the teacher ask students, “What additional information do we learn from the pictures?” This section includes a question mark to click on with the following guidance: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task. See Supporting All Students with Fishtank ELA for more guidance.”
In Unit 4, Lesson 16, the objective states that students will “retell what happens in The Lion and the Mouse. After reading, students are prompted to draw and write what happens in the story. In Supporting All Students, the Language Supports section includes sentence stems such as, “In the beginning...” and “In the end...”, for student use. This section includes a question mark that, when hovered over, provides a pop-up: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text or the task.”
In Unit 7, Lesson 9, the materials include two videos that teachers may show to help build background knowledge and access prior knowledge. The question mark in the box indicates that “these supports can be used to address student gaps in background knowledge,” but guidance does not identify that the provided supports should specifically be used for students in special populations.
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade K partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials include many opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, there are limited opportunities for students to engage with literacy concepts beyond the core materials. The number of lessons that contain an “Opportunities for Enrichment” section is limited. Some of the lessons provide specific scaffolds intended to enhance lessons by providing additional depth, though many add activities for students, such as reading an extra text or portion of a text or completing an additional assignment for the text.
Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, the unit includes one enrichment opportunity: “Create a class bulletin board to highlight all of the different things the kids love about school.”
In Unit 2, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:
In Lesson 1, enrichment opportunities include: “Do an additional art project to have students pretend to weave a web. Have students reflect on how they felt while they were making the web. What is it like to be a busy, focused spider?”
In Lesson 3, enrichment opportunities include: “Push students to notice why the author switches between color and black and white pictures. The illustrations show how the family is feeling. When the pictures are in color, the family is feeling happy. When the pictures are in black and white, the family is scared.”
In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include: “Have students write or tell their own version of a bear or lion hunt. What animals would they see?”
In Unit 7, eight of twelve lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.
In Unit 8, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:
In Lesson 3, enrichment opportunities include:
“Tell students that this type of poem is a question poem. With a question poem, the poem asks lots of questions and then ends with one big, important question.”
“Prompt students to make connections between what they have learned so far and this question: How could plastic make our lives worse?”, and “Tell students that this is an ABC poem. For each letter of the alphabet, the poet names one thing that contains plastic. Prompt: What other things can they think of for each letter?”
“Prompt students to think about which of the items they knew were made of plastic and which items surprised them.”
“Look around the classroom. Have students think about which things in the classroom they know have plastic in them. Then have students think about which things may have hidden plastic. As a class, research the things students are unsure of to see if in fact they do have plastic in them.”
In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include: “If there is extra time, return to the illustration on page 38. Prompt: Why does the illustrator dress the children like superheroes? In what ways are you a hero if you reduce, reuse, and recycle?”
In Lesson 6, enrichment opportunities include: “Lead the class in a discussion of how well they are recycling different objects. Students will complete an action project at the end of the unit, but this is a good chance to have students begin to think about how much they recycle.”
In Lesson 7, enrichment opportunities include: To learn more about Isatou Ceesay and the work she has done in the Gambia, watch:
“How to Recycle Plastic Bags into Purses: Isatou Ceesay - Njau, Gambia” by Miranda Paul (YouTube)
“Isatou Ceesay on the Gambian Women's Recycling Project” by Mike McConnell (YouTube)
In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include: “Ixchel’s story is inspired by the Mayan Hand Weavers. Show students some of the art and products that the weavers create and sell on the Mayan Hands website: Mayan Hands (Mayan Hands).”
In Lesson 10, enrichment opportunities include: “Have students create a plan to limit the amount of food waste they create in the classroom or at school.”
In Lesson 11, enrichment opportunities include: “As a class, create a plan for how to bring composting into the classroom and school.”
In Lesson 12, enrichment opportunities include: “Have students think about areas near their school or in the community that need to be cleaned up. Prompt: What steps can they take to begin to make the area into a community garden?”
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide some variety in how students demonstrate understanding. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, and opportunities include whole group discussion, writing, and partner work. Students often have multiple opportunities to engage their learning within the same lesson; however, the materials do not provide opportunities for students to monitor their understanding. Rather, the teacher monitors students’ progress and understanding.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a limited variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Lesson 5, students “write a letter to Grace Lin explaining which story” is their favorite and why. This is a two-day lesson plan. Students begin by discussing with partners their favorite book and then engaging in a shared writing activity before drafting their own letters. On day 2, students orally retell their favorite book and explain why with a partner before continuing their letter. This lesson provides students with the opportunity to make sense of all the texts written by Grace Lin through speaking and listening and writing.
In Unit 5, Lesson 12, students listen to the book Wild Tracks! A Guide to Nature’s Footprints by Jim Arnoksy. After listening to the text, students investigate one animal. Students first turn and talk to discuss with a partner what their animal’s tracks look like and what can be learned from the track. Then students write about the animal track. Finally, students compare two of the different books about animal tracks they have read so far.
Students have some opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Lesson 7, after listening to Ruthie and the (Not So) Teeny Tiny Lie by Laura Rankin, students discuss what Ruthie learned. Then students write about what Ruthie learned.
In Unit 2, Lesson 10, after listening to Caps for Sale: A Tale of a Peddler, Some Monkeys, and Their Monkey Business by Esphyr Slobodkina, students turn and talk about how the peddler was feeling in the beginning, middle, and end of the story. Then, students engage in a whole class discussion about what else the peddler could have done to get his hats back. Finally, students either write about what the peddler could have done differently or revise their own writing to include how the character is feeling.
Materials sometimes leverage the use of included formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Lesson 6, teachers have the option of showing students the photograph “Segregated Water Foundations in North Carolina, 1950” to help students understand how segregation impacted the two main characters in the book The Other Side by Jacqueline Woodson.
In Unit 8, Lesson 11, students listen to the text The Compost Stew: An A to Z Recipe for the Earth by Mary McKenna Siddals. The Enhanced Lesson Plan indicates that the “book does not include a lot of details about how compost works” and provides four videos to support student learning.
Materials provide minimal opportunity for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide limited strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback or teacher feedback, but do not include strategies, such as peer feedback and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Lesson 11, students use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to explain which book was their favorite. At the end of the lesson, students share their writing with a partner, but students do not provide peer feedback.
In Unit 3, Lesson 5, during a writing activity, lesson guidance suggests the teacher circulate around the room and check in with students to see if they can identify which part of the sentence is missing and if they can fix it.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
While materials provide opportunities for grouping students, the groupings do not vary in type and groupings take place in the same part of each lesson. Students do not have multiple opportunities to work in varied groups or different types of groupings. Materials do not provide specific guidance that explains how teachers should form groups or how teachers should incorporate protocols when grouping students. Materials also miss opportunities to provide suggestions for additional times when groupings could be used.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide limited types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Welcome to School, Lesson 3, activity instructions require “students Turn and Talk with a partner before drawing/writing something they like about themselves.”
In Unit 3, Celebrating Fall, Lesson 8, the teacher reviews the KWL chart with students who “Turn and Tell their partners one thing they have learned about autumn so far.” Later in the lesson, “partners Turn and Talk about if they now know the answer to any of these questions.”
In Unit 4, Falling in Love with Authors and Illustrators, Lesson 9, students discuss what Senor Calaver’s problem was. Then students work with a partner and retell some of the things Senor Calavera was going to bring to Grandma Beetle.
In Unit 7, Exploring Life Cycles, Lesson r, students “use the image to Turn and Talk about the sunflower’s life cycle.” After discussing with their partner, the class has a whole group discussion on the life cycle and “how the life cycle might be different if the seed did not get air, water, or sunlight.”
Materials provide limited guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, the Providing Support During Discourse section provides some guidance for the teacher “to ensure that all students are able to effectively participate in academic discourse, provide the whole-class, small-groups, or individual students with the following supports—Strategically group students. If your class has a large number of English learners, group students who speak the same home language together. Allow them to complete the assignment in either English or in their own home language.”
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Preparing for Academic Discourse section poses this question for teachers to consider: “What vocabulary do students need to know and understand? Do I need to plan for Turn and Talks or small-group work to help students process the content?”
In the Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Types of Academic Discourse section includes information regarding the types of academic discourse provided in Fishtank ELA lessons: whole-class discussions, small-group discourse, and partner discourse. “The type of discourse students participate in will depend on the task and the goals of the lesson. There are many situations where all three types, or a combination of them, would be appropriate to use; however, each one brings some of its own unique values or benefits. When intellectually preparing to teach a lesson, you should think about where in the lesson you can include opportunities for different types of academic discourse.”
Materials provide protocols for Whole Class Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the Protocol for Fishbowl includes the following guidance: “The inner circle discusses a question while the outer circle observes. Note: This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task—often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback. Otherwise, it can be challenging to keep students in the outer circle engaged. Rotate so that each group of students engages in discussion and observation.”
Materials provide protocols for Small Group Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the protocol for Numbered Heads Together includes the following guidance: “Numbered Heads Together holds all members of a group accountable for participating and clarifying understanding of a particular question or topic. Numbered Heads Together can be used with any discussion prompt, however, questions with multiple answers or nuanced answers lead to a more engaging discussion.”
Materials provide protocols for Partner Conversation and “provide all students with a scaffolded and structured opportunity to formulate and share ideas. Partner conversations are low-risk and allow all students a chance to participate in the lesson at the same time.”
While materials provide this guidance in Teacher Support, the lesson plans do not adequately reference this guidance.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide some language supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English; however, materials miss opportunities to label specific protocols for these learners. The included language supports provide support with meaning, context, and understanding. These supports are also helpful to students who speak, write, and/or speak languages other than English with accessing the text or responding to the text. Materials provide additional supports in Teacher Tools that provide general guidance in preparing lessons for multilingual learners; however, they are not lesson specific, are broad in application, and would require teachers to prepare materials for specific lessons within the curriculum.
Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Supporting All Students, the materials provide a question mark next to Language Support, which indicates the following: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text and the task. See the Supporting English Learners Teacher Tool for additional guidance.”
In Unit 2, materials do not include specific supports for multilingual learners.
In Unit 5, materials do not include specific supports for multilingual learners. All supports are general for either Multi-Lingual Learners or students with learning differences.
In Unit 7, materials do not provide specific supports for multilingual learners. All Language Supports and Additional Supports can be used for all students, including multilingual learners.
In Teacher Tools, materials include multiple folders providing guidance for teaching multilingual learners. They include guidance on providing scaffolds that are divided into areas of light support and heavier support. Suggestions include providing illustrations, images, photos, providing videos, films, or audio to support a lesson, using real-life or physical objects, text clues, various graphic scaffolds, and interactive scaffolds, including pairing and working with the student’s home language, and increasing supplemental texts and noticing cognates. These are explained and provided as general guidelines and are not lesson specific.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide suggestions on preparing lessons with multilingual learners in mind, including unpacking the units and texts with a look to analyzing language demands, knowing the language and content goals of the unit, planning for assessment and mastery, and taking ownership of teaching the unit with multilingual learners in mind.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on Engineering the Text that provides guidance on how to physically alter a text to make it more accessible to multilingual learners, including adding questions, proving genre tips, defining vocabulary, explaining key background knowledge, adding illustrations and headings, and including stop and jot questions.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on using oral language supports with multilingual learners. These include the use of various groupings to assist with comprehension and expressing ideas.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide teachers with general scaffolds for multilingual learners. These include:
In the Sensory scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Light EL Support and Heavier EL support. For example, in illustrations, images, and photos light supports suggested are: “Add illustrations to literature texts that do not include illustrations. Illustrations could be used to break up long sections of text or to clarify tricky plot events.” Heavier supports include: “Strategically engineer the text to include illustrations that align with specific features of text complexity. Multiple illustrations could be added to make the text easier to digest. (For example, when reading the Brer Rabbit folktales about the well, include an illustration of a well.)
In Interactive Scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Pairs, Small Groups, Discussion, Cooperative Structures, and Home Language. For example, in Home Language, materials state: “For lighter EL support: Have students use translanguaging by using some words and phrases from their home language when discussing or writing about content. For heavier EL support: Have students have entire conversations in their home language or have students write answers in their home language. Provide additional instruction on a particular concept or idea in students’ home language. Provide students with texts and problems written in their home language. Have students write an answer in their home language. Then have students transfer their answers to English.”
In Additional Supports, materials provide the teacher with suggestions for “Supplemental Text” support and “Noticing Cognates.” In the “Noticing Cognates” support, materials provide the following: “For lighter EL support: Teach students strategies for identifying cognates and have students self-identify and interpret examples of cognates in texts and tasks. For heavier EL support: Before reading a text, find examples of cognates and have students break them down. Focus on the meaning and intonation of the words. Teach students Greek and Latin roots that are cognates in English and Spanish. Have students create cognate reference guides.”
In Oral Language Protocols, materials provide the teacher with protocols for the following: Turn and Talk, Think-Pair Share, Write-Pair Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share Revised, Partner A Partner B. An example of the “Think-Pair-Share Revised protocol states: “Students are given a chance to refine their thinking and ideas based on their partner’s ideas and discussion. The teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer. Students pair up. Students take turns sharing their answers. Students revise their original theories or ideas.”
In Engineering Texts, materials provide the teacher with a three-step guide to support planning. The explanation includes, “When you engineer a text, you add text supports to ensure all students have access. This does not mean changing the text or lowering the rigor of the task. An engineered text anticipates possible student misconceptions, gives vocabulary cues, provides additional background knowledge, scaffolds questions, and creates opportunities for discussion.”
In Graphic Organizer, for multilingual learner support, materials provide the teacher with “suggestions on how to adjust the organizers to provide light or heavy EL support.” Some examples include:
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide light EL support:
Provide blank templates for students to use when reading a text, brainstorming, or solving problems.
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide heavy EL support:
Provide students with partially filled-out graphic organizers.
Provide guidance on where in the text, resources, or problem students can find a particular answer. (For example, if students are looking to describe a character, provide specific paragraph numbers where students can find key evidence.)
Have students work in partners using an oral language protocol.
If applicable, allow students to complete the graphic organizer in their home language.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts. The publishers state in the overview that they “seek to create curricular materials that center students, reflect multiple perspectives and experiences, and empower students to think critically about the world they live in.” The texts hold true to that standard as they contain characters from across a broad spectrum of society.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, students listen to the text Dreamers by Yuyi Morales. This story tells of the author’s immigration to the United States, and portrays the resilience, hope, and dreams of immigrants.
In Unit 6, students listen to Let’s Talk About Race by Julius Lester. This text introduces race as one of many chapters in someone’s life, The text includes illustrations of different genders, races, ethnicities, and physical characteristics. The author uses his own story as he explores what makes each of us special.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, students listen to the text The Ugly Vegetables by Grace Lin. This text tells the story of a Chinese-American girl who wishes for a garden of bright flowers instead of one full of bumpy, ugly vegetables. The tale features a main character who learns that regardless of appearance, everything has its own beauty and purpose.
In Unit 6, students listen to the story All the Colors of the Earth by Sheila Hamanaka. This text includes illustrations and celebrates the colors of children and the colors of love, resulting in a richly diverse picture book that celebrates the differences found in others.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Falling in Love with Authors and Illustrators, students listen to the story, My Name is Gabriela: The Life of Gabriela Mistral by Monica Brown. This text tells the story of Gabriela Mistral’s life, focusing on the importance of following your dream, the result of which was Gabriela becoming the first Nobel Prize-winning Latina woman.
In Unit 6, students listen to the story Martin’s Big Words: The Life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. by Doreen Rappaport. This text uses quotes from some of Dr. King’s most well-known speeches to tell the story of his life and his work in a simple, direct way. This text received the Caldecott Honor, Corretta Scott King Honor, and New York Times Book Review Best Illustrated Children’s Book honors, and engages students with Dr. King’s message through the use of his own words.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The Teacher Tools provide some suggestions that scaffolds can be provided for students in their home language and that student conversations can be held in their home language. These suggestions are very general and leave the implementation and development of the specific scaffolds to the teacher. Materials include suggestions that teachers should consider students’ backgrounds when preparing a lesson, but materials do not provide specifics on how this should be done. The lesson plans include some scaffolds for multilingual learners but do not specifically address ways to use the home language to support learners that are lesson-specific. The Teacher Support section includes general guidance for supporting multilingual learners that relates to leveraging students’ home language through the use of translanguaging strategies.
Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, materials include a suggestion that when possible, teachers should show video adaptations of text in either English or the student’s native language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, when discussing creating graphs and charts to aid students in comprehending the text, materials include a provision to create the aids in the student’s home language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, Interactive Scaffolds, materials include provisions for incorporating the use of the student’s home language in discussions. Levels of support for students vary from translating phrases or words to allowing students to have complete conversations in their home language.
In Teacher Tools, the Planning for English Learners section provides teachers with a step-by-step guide of questions to intellectually prepare the unit. In Step One, the teacher unpacks the unit texts and tasks. Directions state, “Teachers should analyze the text, materials, vocabulary, unit focus areas, and lessons to determine the language demands of the unit. Questions include: What makes the text and tasks linguistically complex? What key vocabulary do students need to know and understand to engage with discipline-specific knowledge? What key language use(s) are targeted in the unit? How are students developing their understanding and production of all the key uses of language? (recount, explain, argue, discuss)” In Step Two, the teacher sets a vision for mastery. Directions state, “Teachers should articulate the language and content goals of the unit. What are the driving language demands of the unit? What language should you see and hear from students as they engage in meaning-making? Based on the language demands of the unit, what are the overall language goals for the unit? What are the content goals for the unit? What should students know and understand about reading, writing, and language? What should students know and understand about the themes/subjects of the unit?” In Step Three, teachers plan for assessment and mastery. In Step Four, teachers take ownership.
In Teacher Tools, English Learners, the Engineering Texts support provides teachers with a sample text. The example includes the following statements: “Let’s look at a before and after from a 5th-grade assignment from Science and Social Studies Unit 4: Exploring Mars, Lesson 19. In this lesson, students are reading a NASA press release for the first time. Here’s the original text, without text engineering, a press release from NASA: Mars Rovers Advance Understanding of the Red Planet As you can see, the text is complex for many reasons: Students may not be familiar with what a press release is, and the formal language used in a press release. Students may not have a strong grasp on knowledge from the unit so far, making it hard for them to understand key ideas from the press release. Students may not have a strong understanding of domain-specific vocabulary. Now, take a look at our Engineered Text Sample. This sample includes our meta-analysis of the purpose of each addition.”
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, the materials include general guidance to use translanguaging strategies. Students can annotate and take notes in their home language and research in their home language.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials include a support section in Teacher Tools that provides teachers with suggestions and methods for preparing lessons for multilingual learners. Materials provide multiple suggestions on how the lessons can be scaffolded for multilingual learners. These suggestions are general in nature and are not lesson-specific, leaving any scaffolding for lessons to be developed by the teacher. The Teacher Tool for Planning for English Learners provides further guidance that tells teachers to consider any connection between a lesson and students’ cultural backgrounds but the resource does not provide any specific guidance on how this should be done. Teachers must investigate and implement strategies on their own. Individual lessons include very limited scaffolding for multilingual learners, and none include connections to linguistics, culture, or conventions used in learning ELA. Suggested scaffolds include audio or visual representations of the text when available.
Materials make limited connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make limited connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Scaffolds for English Learners, the Additional Scaffolds section includes guidance on noticing cognates. Supports range from identifying and interpreting examples of cognates, teaching Greek and Latin roots, and creating cognate reference guides.
Materials include limited teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, during Step Four: Take Ownership of Planning for English Learners, guidance advises teachers to plan how they will consider students’ backgrounds when teaching a text. Suggestions include considering if connections can be made to students’ cultural traditions and considering what sociocultural context is relevant to the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two includes planning for how students’ backgrounds will connect to the lesson, including planning for any language demands that will need to be met.
Materials include limited equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two states, “Ensure accessibility: What supports will students with higher language proficiency need to access and understand the content? What scaffolds (sensory, graphic, or interactive) are needed?” The guidance also asks educators to consider medium and lower language proficiency needs.
Materials include limited opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, materials provide limited guidance on incorporating students’ holistic and cultural identities into the classroom, including learning about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds, inviting family or community members into the classroom, choosing materials that authentically represent students’ language and culture, and using intellectual preparation to plan for including students’ cultural identifies.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
Materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Teachers can access “ready-made slides and handouts which [they] can edit, download, print, or send to Google Classroom.” Materials do not include specific provisions for students to use digital technology in research or composing writing assignments. Materials do not include interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards. The digital platform is intended for teacher use.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are not available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials do not include digital technology. The materials do not include any specific opportunities or guidelines for students and/or teachers to collaborate with each other. Materials do not provide opportunities for students to complete activities digitally. Materials do not provide specific guidance requiring students to collaborate digitally with peers or teachers.
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Student materials include images for vocabulary words. The assessments and text-based student materials are easily read, and the structure is easily accessible to students. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter. Materials include PDF documents that are organized in an accessible way. Materials provide graphic organizers when needed to help students with organization. The use of typography, layout, and space is visually appealing, though there is little variance in color and no engaging images.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a vocabulary package, which includes word cards and a student glossary. These two documents contain pictures that showcase an image of each vocabulary word. These images are not distracting and they support students’ learning.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The vocabulary pages and Target Task pages that can be created for students are consistent and maintain the same layout. The information is easily identifiable and supports student understanding of the materials.
Throughout the curriculum, the teacher directions are consistent. There is a PDF version of each lesson, and lessons follow a consistent structure.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Student materials do not include organizational features.
Each unit includes a lesson map. The layout is consistent across the curriculum.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials do not include embedded technology. Although teacher materials are digital, the use of technology is limited, and teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials do not provide specific lessons that incorporate teaching students how to use technology properly. Although materials include some general suggestions, such as instructing teachers that they should tell students to be certain that the resources they use are reliable, materials do not provide specifics on how to accomplish that task. Rather, teachers would have to develop guidelines and protocols for the use of technology independently.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found