About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Fishtank Plus ELA 6-8 | ELA
ELA 6-8
The instructional materials for Fishtank Plus 6-8 meet the expectations of alignment and building knowledge but do not meet the expectations for usability. The materials include texts that are well-crafted. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. Because a similar topic or theme connects all units, students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge-building.
There is not sufficient support or guidance in the program provided for teachers to implement the program with fidelity. While some guidance is provided, the suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of additional materials and scaffolds to the teacher.
6th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
7th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
8th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 6th Grade
Alignment Summary
The grade 6 Fishtank Plus ELA materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit.
Throughout the program, students have the ability to engage in fruitful discussions and to practice their writing skills. Students engage in all forms of writing, although the writing types do not reflect the distribution of text types expected by the standards. The materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammage usage standards but do include multiple opportunities for students to engage in guided vocabulary instruction.
The grade 6 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming of age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills.
The pacing guide and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.
6th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
The grade 6 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted and from multiple perspectives. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The questions and tasks included in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit.
In the program, students regularly engage in fruitful class discussions where they can practice their speaking and listening skills, as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students also engage in on-demand and process writing opportunities across text types, although the opportunities do not reflect the distribution of text types expected of the standards. Explicit evidence-based writing instruction guidance in the materials is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The materials do include guidance on vocabulary instruction, and students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
The grade 6 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works, with a 77/23 split. While quantitative analysis places many texts below the 6th-grade Lexile band, qualitative analysis reveals that texts are at the appropriate levels of complexity for 6th-grade students. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. There are a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.
Anchor texts are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The anchor texts in each unit are engaging, easily relatable, and will stretch students’ thinking while weaving a similar theme of exploring coming of age in various settings.
Anchor texts are of high quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, students read the anchor text, The Watsons Go To Birmingham-1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis, a Newbery award-winning author. The text includes complex themes as the reader follows Kenny, a young African-American boy as he deals with both large and small coming of age moments during the Civil Rights Movement.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, students read the anchor text, The Giver by Lois Lowry, an engaging, dystopian novel that allows students to consider topics of interest.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, students read the anchor text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland, a memoir detailing the true story of the third African-American ballerina for the American Ballet Theatre. Students explore the story of a ground-breaking African American woman who overcame many challenges as she rose to fame in the arts.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students read the anchor text, The Outsiders by SE Hinton. The classic, engaging coming-of-age novel explores themes relatable to this age group.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read two anchor texts, Refugee by Alan Gratz and The Unwanted: Stories of Syrian Refugees by Don Brown, an award-winning graphic novelist. The Unwanted: Stories of Syrian Refugees is a graphic novel about real-life experiences that occur when someone is a refugee. The second anchor text, Refugee, introduces different refugees from different time periods and explores how they change over the course of their individual stories.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works with a 77/23 split. However, instructional time spent with the literary works across the grade level is higher than informational texts. Text types include memoirs, photographs, interviews, videos, websites, articles spanning a range of nonfiction topics, Tedtalks, drama, poems, short stories, and novels. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resistance: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, students read the book by the same title by Christopher Paul Curtis, articles such as “Siblings Share Genes, But Rarely Personalities” by Alix Spiegel, poems including “The Ballad of Birmingham” by Dudley Randall, and photographs such as “Outside Looking In, Mobile, Alabama, 1956” by Gordon Parks. Students also listen to an audio interview, “‘Green Book’ Helped African Americans Travel Safely,” produced by NPR. Multiple informational texts are included to build student background knowledge in the Enhanced Lesson Plan throughout the unit, such as: “Welfare is a Women’s Issue” by Johnnie Tillmon, “Why We Must Talk about the Asian-American Story, Too” by Brandon Simeo Starkey, “The Coronavirus Exposes the History of Racism and ‘Cleanliness’” by Nylah Burton, and “What is Psychological Shock? And 5 Tips for Coping” by Alice Boyes. Students also read informational articles from Popular Science magazine and websites about Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Jim Crow, and the NAACP.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, students read The Giver, a dystopian fiction novel written by Lois Lowry. Additional materials, including an article and a video, help expand student understanding of a dystopia. Other materials include five articles centered around the argument of the appropriate amount of screen time for kids, including “The Harmful Effects of Too Much Screen Time for Kids” by Amy Morin. Finally, students view a video about screen time and read the science fiction short story “Examination Day” by Henry Slesar. Multiple informational videos are included to build student background knowledge in the Enhanced Lesson Plan throughout the unit, such as: “Fresh Hell” by Laura Miller and “Dystopian Fiction: An Introduction” by John Joseph Adams. Multiple videos are provided as extra support to build background knowledge, such as: "Describing Colors As A Blind Person" by The Tommy Edison Experience,
"Kids Describe Color to a Blind Person" by Cut, "Giving my colorblind Papa EnChroma glasses" by Carson Stafford, “What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains” by Epipheo, and “What happens when you give your kids unlimited screen time?” by Good Morning America.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, students read a book entitled Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland, an article “Gee’s Bend Quiltmakers” by Souls Grown Deep, watch videos such as “How a Group of Women in This Small Alabama Town Perfected the Art of Quilting | Op-Docs” on The New York Times’ YouTube channel, watch a movie “A Ballerina’s Tale” directed by Nelson George, and explore websites including “Ruth Asawa: Objects and Apparitions.” Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: “Straight Talk about the N-Word” from Teaching Tolerance and “Interview with Mary Lee Bendolph and Lucy Mingo by Josephine Reed for the NEA” by Josephine Reed. Multiple informational videos are also included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background, such as: “How to Do the 5 Basic Positions: Ballet Dance”, “Music Box with Ballroom Dancing Couple-Ballerina Style-Anniversary Waltz,” “VINTAGE REFUGE DANCING BALLERINA MUSIC BOX,” and “Antique Music Box.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students read the novel The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton. Students then watch a video version of the novel and read a poem by Robert Frost that is quoted within the anchor text. Other materials include three articles: “At some schools, students find a place for peace” by Lolly Bowean, the contemporary poem “We Real Cool” by Gwendolyn Brooks, and a silent video illustrating the contemporary poem. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background, such as a Wikipedia article titled “Drive-In Theater”, a Newsela article titled "How to Deal With the Death of a Loved One". Multiple videos are also included to build background knowledge, such as: "A Forest Year" (YouTube) and “Empathy vs Sympathy: Which one are you?” by Psych2Go.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read two texts Refugee by Alan Gratz and The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown, explore a website “How to Read Comics”, and read the article “Refugee” by Diane Boudreau, Melissa McDaniel, Erin Sprout, and Andrew Turgeon. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background, such as:
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 2, the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes the informational article “What is a Graphic Novel?” by Jessica Abel, “Alien World to Help OUt Syria Since This One Refuses To.” (The Onion), and multiple photographs of the ship, St. Louis.
Materials reflect a balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:
Materials reflect a 77/23 balance of informational and literary texts with 38 informational texts and five literary texts.
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, the materials across the unit contain ten informational texts and two literary texts. The core text is informational.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, the materials across the unit contain eight informational texts and two literary texts. The core text is literary.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the materials across the unit contain 14 informational texts. The core text is informational.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, the materials across the unit contain three informational texts and five literary texts. The core text is literary.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee and The Unwanted, the materials across the unit contain four informational texts.
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.
Materials include anchor texts that fall below the Lexile stretch band, ranging between 750L and 920L; however, the publisher consistently provides qualitative analysis rationales for text selection, placement, and purpose the Text Selection Rationale or the Notes for Teacher section. While quantitative analysis places many texts below the 6th grade lexile band, qualitative analysis reveals that texts are at the appropriate levels of complexity for 6th grade student. The qualitative rationale states that the relationship between the texts and the associated student tasks is accessible for the grade level. The qualitative analysis also shows that the complexity increases slightly for varying reasons, including text structure, language, and knowledge demands. The qualitative text complexity is determined by the Achieve the Core’s Literary Text Complexity Rubric.
Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, but they are appropriate for qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, the anchor text, The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul (920L), falls slightly below the Lexile range but is appropriate at the beginning of the school year. Qualitatively, the text is moderately challenging since it has complex themes, unusual text structure, and informal language. The associated student tasks are medium, giving an overall qualitative measure of moderate.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority, the anchor text, The Giver by Lois Lowry (760L), falls below the Lexile range; however, it has some complex elements and is appropriate at the beginning of the school year. Qualitatively, the text is of medium complexity since the narration is in chronological order and the knowledge demands are accessible. The associated tasks are challenging, becoming progressively more difficult as students read more of the novel. The overall qualitative measure is complex.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the anchor text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland (890L), falls below the stretch band. Qualitatively, the text is of medium difficulty due to the chronological plot and domain-specific vocabulary. The associated tasks are moderate for the grade level. The overall qualitative measure is moderate.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, the anchor text, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton (750L), falls below the Lexile range but has some complex elements. Qualitatively, the text is of medium complexity since it is set in the mid-1960s and the experiences, language, idioms, and slang of the novel make it more challenging for a modern audience. The associated tasks are challenging for the grade level. The overall qualitative measure is complex.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read two core texts: Refugee by Alan Gatz (800L) and The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown (GN860L), which both fall below the Lexile range. The qualitative analysis for Refugee is considered to be of high difficulty because the knowledge demands assume readers already have some understanding of World War Two and the Syrian refugee crisis. The text also uses figurative language, tier-two vocabulary, and words in different languages. The Unwanted is considered to be of medium difficulty because it is a graphic novel that has no clear protagonist, frequently jumps around in location between frames, includes numerous frames with no text at all, and uses only direct quotes in speech bubbles. The associated tasks are challenging. The overall qualitative measure is complex.
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile rating for the text, The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul. The rationale also includes qualitative features to consider, such as students navigating “informal, colloquial language and occasional non-standards grammatical structures.” The educational purpose of the text is to expose students to more mature conversations regarding racial segregation, violence, and oppression.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority, the Text Selection Rationale for The Giver states: “The Giver has a Lexile Level of 760L, which – by this measure – puts it slightly below the median reading level for the majority of 6th-grade students at the beginning of the school year.” The rationale provides qualitative features: “the language demands of the text are relatively high, as Lowry regularly uses vocabulary that is likely to be unfamiliar to most students”. The educational purpose of the text is to “introduce abstract concepts (like utopia, dystopia, and the right to self-determination) that require students to think about their own lives and the world around them in new and complex ways.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile for the text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland, and qualitative measures that state the vocabulary demands increase the complexity of the text. The Notes for Teachers section suggests that educators contact their school staff and parents of students when reading the core text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina. The text discusses domestic violence and eating disorders and also includes the use of a racial slur. Other supporting texts are also included and noted as having mature content worthy of parent notification. The educational purpose of the text is to provide “a rigorous but accessible text for 6th graders, especially as they develop into more skillful readers of nonfiction...the reader follows Copeland’s compelling story from her young childhood to the moment she achieves her dream of becoming a principal dancer in the American Ballet Theater.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connections, the publisher provides an online Text Selection Rationale for The Outsiders. The rationale states that the Lexile measure of 750L “puts it below the mid-year median reading level of 6th-grade students.” The qualitative rationale states: “The book was written in the 1960s and includes slang from this time period...The author regularly uses idioms, irony, and figurative language, as well as tier-two vocabulary...The protagonist’s life experiences will be unfamiliar (and perhaps difficult to understand) to many students.” The educational purpose of the text is to provide a classic text that resonates with students, as they “explore the topic of ‘coming of age’ through the story of a young man struggling to determine right and wrong in a world defined by violence.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile for the text, Refugee by Alan Gratz, and a qualitative measure that points out the text’s unique structure. The text includes “three different protagonists living in three different time periods; throughout the novel, Gratz weaves their stories together in subtle and overt ways that students will need to identify in order to fully understand the content and craft of the text.” In the Notes for Teachers section, teachers are warned that The Unwanted might be particularly distressing for students because of the visual depictions in the graphic novel format. The materials acknowledge, “While we feel that these images are not gratuitous, it is strongly recommended that you determine what is appropriate for your specific group of students and inform parents about what you will be discussing.” The educational purpose is to inform readers about an urgent issue.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.
Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The Unit Summary and individual lessons outline a path for growth in literacy skills over time. Texts of varying complexity are included in each unit and are interconnected to add meaning to unit topics. Students practice skills during the beginning, middle, and end of the year and learn concepts and standards. Each lesson includes a Standards Map that shows when the literacy skills appear as core or supporting standards in units.
Materials include suggested supports in each lesson. The teacher resources provide guidance on using the supports when reading the texts. Lessons contain multiple supports, including Language Supports and Additional supports during Close Reading, which feature guiding questions and key ideas students should understand. Discussion supports include questions and graphic organizers to guide students in locating information for discussions. Some lessons include supports for the Target Task with scaffolded questions that build understanding. Although not all lessons include the same supports, lessons other than writing lessons include multiple sections of support that provide teachers with scaffolds to ensure that students can access the texts and successfully complete the lessons.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
One literacy skill taught throughout the year is to explain how an author develops point of view (RL.6.6). In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 20, the lesson objective states: “Identify Kenny’s point of view and explain how it changes over the course of a chapter and the text overall.” Students explain how Kenny has changed and what he has learned in two paragraphs. The Close Read Questions ask: “What point of view do Kenny and Byron have on welfare, and how does it differ from Momma’s? How does the author develop the reader’s understanding of their point of view?” In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 1, the lesson objective states: “Explain how S. E. Hinton begins to develop the narrator’s point of view in The Outsiders.” Students develop a claim about how Ponyboy sees himself because of outside influences by using textual support in a brief writing activity. The Close Read Questions ask: “How does Cherry view greasers? Does Ponyboy share her point of view?” and “How does talking with Cherry about the sunset impact Ponyboy’s perspective?” In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 5, the lesson objective states: “Determine author Don Brown’s point of view on the world’s response to the Syrian refugee crisis and his purpose in writing The Unwanted.” Students explain Brown’s perspective on the world’s response to the refugee crisis using textual support and consider how this perspective relates to the author’s purpose in a brief writing activity. The Close Read Questions require students to consider the point of view by examining illustrations and anecdotes.
Another literacy skill taught throughout the year is to analyze how a particular sentence, chapter, scene, or stanza fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the theme, setting, or plot (RL6.5). In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 5, the lesson objective states: “Explain how specific passages from Chapters 7 and 8 of The Giver develop the setting and fit into the overall structure of the text.” The Close Read Questions ask: “How does the story about Asher on pages 69–70 help develop the setting of the text? Provide specific evidence from the text to support your answer. How do the last two pages of Chapter 7 contribute to the development of the plot? Where does this chapter fall in the overall structure of the text? Carefully explain your thinking.” In Unit 5, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 11, the lesson objective states: “Explain how specific scenes and lines of text fit into the overall structure of The Outsiders and develop the plot.” The Close Read Questions ask: “How does the scene between Darry and Paul develop the idea that the Socs and the greasers are not really so different from one another? Support your answer with evidence from pages 142-143.” In Unit 6, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 2, the lesson objective states: “Define significant terms essential for understanding graphic novels, and explain how Brown uses text and illustrations to develop the reader’s understanding of the conflict in Syria.” Students evaluate specific sections of a graphic novel and how the images and text both impact the plot.
As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, and skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, the general description of the supports available states: “The Fishtank ELA curriculum includes five types of supports to help provide students access to different features of text complexity-language supports, background knowledge supports, additional supports, foundational skills supports, and opportunities for enrichment. After you have determined the aspect of the texts that will be most challenging for your students, you can decide which supports are most appropriate. These supports can be used with the whole group, in small groups, or individually.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.
In the Teacher Tools, “Supporting English Learners,” the guidance states: “Learn how to provide scaffolds that help English Learners access complex texts. Explore the different types of graphic organizers that can be used as scaffolds.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham--1963, Lesson 6, there are multiple sections of supports, including supports when students are engaged in close reading. Teachers are provided with scaffolding questions such as: “What is divergence? What does this theory have to do with competition? What happens, according to this theory, if one sibling is very good at or very interested in something?” Other supports identify what students should understand and a sentence frame for students to use in expressing their understanding.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, students spend 15 lessons reading The Giver, revisiting the theme, analyzing the impact of certain words or phrases, and studying text development. In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 1, teacher supports include “Potential stopping points with scaffolding questions” to use while showing a video. In Lesson 14, the following scaffold is provided: “What theme does Lois Lowry develop on the topic of choice? What details help to develop this theme? What does Jonas discover about having and making choices? What does Lowry seem to be suggesting about the importance of choices? What does Lowry seem to be suggesting about the potential downsides of having choices?” As students read higher Lexile nonfiction texts in Lessons 16-30, more time is spent on each individual text as they gather evidence to use in a writing piece, and texts are revisited throughout the end lessons while writing.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 17, suggested support is to create a graphic organizer for students to organize their notes when “reading” a piece of art. The graphic organizer includes prompts for students to consider in evaluating the piece of art. The second set of suggested supports in the lesson provides questions for consideration during close reading and a second graphic organizer to combine notes from the close reading, from the article read, and from a video watched.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students spend Lessons 1-14 reading The Outsiders. Starting in Lesson 3, students complete lower-level tasks, such as characterizing Ponyboy and discussing how his point of view changes. The Close Reading Questions include: “How does Cherry view greasers? Does Ponyboy share her point of view? Provide two pieces of evidence from pages 37- 38.”
For those questions, the scaffolded questions include: “How does Cherry describe the greasers? How does she describe the Socs? Does Ponyboy agree about what makes them different? Students should understand: ‘you greasers have a different set of values. You're more emotional. We're sophisticated -- cool to the point of not feeling anything’ (p. 38). ‘it's not money, it's feeling -- you don't feel anything and we feel too violently’ (p. 38).”
The provided sentence frames include: “Cherry views the greasers as _______, and Ponyboy sees them as _______. Hinton develops Cherry's perspective through ________. Hinton develops Ponyboy's perspective through ________. This helps the reader better understand _______.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & the Unwanted, Lesson 19, in the suggested supports for Language the teacher circulates and checks in with students who may struggle, helping them prepare for the discussion by starring evidence that they might want to share. An additional language support is to ensure that students have their vocabulary glossaries with them during the discussion to use at least one academic vocabulary word and one text-specific word in their discussion. Teachers are also suggested to use graphic organizers with students to help with taking notes in preparation for the discussion. As they take notes on the organizer, the supports suggest circulating through the room and providing specific page numbers for students who are struggling to find the right evidence.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.
Materials include a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading. There is support in place connecting to specific texts as students engage in these readings. Over the course of the year, students read different types of texts ranging from traditional print sources; such as literary and informational novels, newspaper articles, and magazine articles, to non-traditional sources such as graphic novel, film, and video. Students engage in a volume of reading across the school year, including reading during and outside the school day on a consistent basis. The Teacher Tools section includes procedures and routines for different types of reading, including Interactive Read Alouds, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading. The materials include independent reading opportunities that are often homework assignments; students take part in comprehensive discussions and activities related to the homework reading in class the following day. The resource, Recommended Texts for Independent Reading, makes recommendations for fiction and non-fiction texts with aligned themes and topics and additional texts by the same author.
Teacher Tools provide additional guidance for educators relating to independent reading procedures, though the guidance is often general rather than lesson-specific. For example, the Components of an ELA Lesson under the Homework heading states: “Some lessons require students to read sections of the text prior to class. Homework for the next lesson is identified. Homework should be assigned at the end of the class period.” Teacher Tools also offer guidance relating to Reading Structures and Routines, including information for Independent Reading for Homework (6–12): “...to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.” The Teacher Tools are consistent across grade levels, and the guidance provides suggestions for accountability measures, such as graphic organizers, annotations, and written checks for understanding. Though there is no specific tracking system provided, students are expected to complete reading homework on a regular basis to be able to complete in-class activities. They are held accountable to this reading through homework questions related to the assigned reading which can be found in each lesson plan. The teacher uses these questions to launch the following lesson with a quick class discussion.
Instructional materials identify opportunities and provide supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham–1963, students read the anchor text, The Watsons Go to Birmingham–1963 by Christoper Paul Curtis, a historical fiction novel. The supplemental texts include informational articles, poems, audio interviews, and photos from a primary source historical document.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, students read the anchor text, The Giver, a dystopian novel by Lois Lowry. Supplemental texts include informational articles and videos.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, students read the anchor text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina, a memoir written by Misty Copeland. Supplemental texts include informational articles, videos, video interviews, websites, and a movie.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students read the anchor text, The Outsiders, a novel by S.E. Hinton. Supplemental texts include a movie based on the core novel, articles, poetry, and a video.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read two literary nonfiction books as anchor texts, The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown and Refugee by Alan Gratz. Supplemental texts include an article and informational website.
Instructional materials identify opportunities and offer supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham–1963, students read multiple texts such as: The Watsons Go to Birmingham–1963, historical fiction by Christopher Paul Curtis, “The Children’s Hour,” a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longellow, “How Much Does Birth Order Shape Our Lives?” an article by Allison Aubrey, and ‘Green Book’ Helped African Americans Travel Safely an audio interview by NPR. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, students read multiple texts such as: The Giver by Lois Lowry, “The Harmful Effects of Too Much Screen Time for Kids” by Amy Morin, “Why the screen babysitter is worse than you think” by Baltimore Sun Editorial Board, and “Don’t Limit Your Teen’s Screen Time” by Chris Bergman. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students read multiple texts such as: “Why It’s Hard to Be a Poor Boy With Richer Neighbors” by Dana Goldstein, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, “We Real Cool” by Gwendolyn Brooks, and “Nothing Gold Can Stay” by Robert Frost. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read multiple texts such as: Refugee by Alan Gratz, The Unwanted: Stories of Syrian Refugees by Don Brown, and “Refugee” by Dian Boudrewau, et al. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework.
There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance for a proposed schedule for independent reading is explained: “In order to show accelerated reading growth, students need to read for at least 15 minutes a day, with the greatest growth being shown in students who read over a half-hour to an hour a day. Due to the block structure of most middle and high schools, it would be nearly impossible for students to read in class for 30 minutes a day while also having time to critically analyze the text through discussion and writing. Therefore, to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.”
In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance related to accountability is stated:
“Assign an annotation focus. Have students annotate in the text to show their understanding of the text. Student annotations can be used to show that students are reading and that they understand what they are reading. Students can return to their annotations during class discussions and writing.
Provide Graphic Organizers. While reading, have students use different graphic organizers to interact with the text. Potential graphic organizers include: Say, Mean, Matter Graphic Organizer or Double Journal Entry.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 8, students read the memoir Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland. The homework assignment asks students to read pages 203–211 and pages 228–233 independently. The materials ask teachers to provide students with a summary of the reading to date as additional support; the materials provide a bullet list summary as a key. In Lesson 9, students complete a written check for understanding around the question: “Why does Copeland include the story of receiving an award from the Boys and Girls Club? What idea does this illustrate?”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 10, students read the next chapter of The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton for homework. Guidance includes specific questions for students to answer while reading, such as: “How are the greasers feeling as they prepare for the rumble? How do you know? Who ‘wins’ the rumble? Where do Dally and Ponyboy go after the rumble is over?”
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The grade 6 materials include questions and tasks that require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year. The questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. There are consistent opportunities to practice speaking and listening skills as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, reflecting a 50/25/25 split. Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit teacher guidance on evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. Materials include guidance on vocabulary instruction. Students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.
Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and text-dependent, referencing specific page numbers or portions of the text at times. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year, and the questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. Almost all segments of the Lesson Plan, including Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions, require students to return to the text and provide evidence to support their ideas and support students in making meaning of core understanding of the texts being studied. The program uses a common system of organization, and students answer a series of writing prompts and questions to comprehend the text, build knowledge, and understand how the reading and tasks connect to each unit's overall topic/theme.
Materials provide support for planning instruction and implementing text-based questions and tasks, including example answers and Notes for Teachers that highlight areas where students might struggle. The Notes for Teachers include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support both within and outside of the materials. Some lessons, such as Unit 5, Lesson 2, include additional lesson-specific Notes. In each lesson, the Enhanced Lesson Plans provide Scaffolding questions for both the Close Read Questions and Writing Prompts to support teachers and students in answering the questions or completing the tasks successfully.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 9, students read an excerpt from the text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. After reading, students answer Close Read Questions on word choice, developing point of view, perspectives, and figurative language that require revisiting the text. At the end of the lesson, they complete the Writing Prompt: “How does Byron’s perspective of the ‘surprise’ in the car change from page 109 to page 110? How does Christopher Paul Curtis develop this through specific words and phrases in Byron’s dialogue? Provide at least two examples from these pages. Explain how word choice demonstrates his perspective.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 11, students read Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland. At the end of the lesson, students answer the Writing Prompt: “Why does Copeland share her life story with the world, even though she sometimes faces criticism and judgment? What message is she trying to share with the world? Provide at least two pieces of quoted evidence from the text to support your answer.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 9, students read The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton and answer the Close Read Questions: “How does Hinton develop the idea that the public’s perception of Johnny and Ponyboy has changed since the fire? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from pages 107–108 that demonstrate this idea. How has Randy’s perspective on greasers changed since the fire? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from page 115.” At the end of the lesson, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How and why has Ponyboy’s perception of the Socs changed? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from pages 115–118 that demonstrate how Hinton develops his changed perspective and carefully explain your reasoning.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 15, students read an excerpt of Refugee by Alan Gratz and complete a Writing Prompt at the end of the lesson: “How does Josef initially respond to the idea of taking over the ship’s bridge, and how does his perspective on this change between pages 242 and 253 through 258? Use the word ‘resolve’ in your answer and provide at least two pieces of specific evidence from these pages to support your ideas.”
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In all units, materials provide support for teachers. In the Unit Summary, materials provide a number of supports for teachers when approaching the unit texts, including an overview of both the text and the learning outcomes. The Unit Summary includes the Notes for Teachers section which contains pertinent information about teaching the core text, such as how to approach specific lessons and where to find further supports in the materials. In each lesson, the Key Understandings section provides an overview of the Skills and Strategies that students should be learning and using. The Knowledge section provides the main ideas and plot details from the text(s). In some units, the summary provides warnings about content that might be a concern to students and parents.
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go To Birmingham—1963, Lesson 8, students read the core text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis and answer the Close Read Question: “Summarize the events of pages 86-89. Aim for a three-sentence summary.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes scaffolding questions for teachers to ask as well as student understandings. In Lesson 20, students complete the Writing Prompt: “Explain why The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 is considered a ‘coming of age’ novel. How has Kenny changed and grown over the course of the book? What has he learned? Support your answer with at least two pieces of evidence from this final chapter.” A Sample Response is available in the lesson as support. In all units, Writing Prompts include a Sample Response.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 14, students read The Giver and answer the Close Read Question: “Where in the text does Lowry explore the thematic topic of resistance? Find at least two places.” Supports for teachers identify what ideas students need to understand to fully answer the question. There is also a notation for teachers suggesting that students should carefully answer the questions provided to be successful in the Writing Prompt. Further teacher guidance provides suggestions for modeling finding a theme if students are suggesting ideas that are text-specific.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 10, the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes the Writing Prompt: “Explain why Chapter 13–and specifically Copeland’s performance as the Firebird– represents the climax of her story. Carefully explain your thinking.” The teacher is provided context and explanations for how to present the information and additional probing questions to guide students to the answer. In the Supporting All Students section, Scaffolding Questions are provided: “What is Misty’s goal throughout the text?” along with student understandings included in additional supports.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 16, students read “Study: Teens who expect to die young are more likely to commit crime” by The Dallas Morning News and “[s]ummarize the key findings of the study” with scaffolding questions, such as, “What is ‘short term’? What is ‘long-term’? What question did the researchers ask? ”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 13, in the Enhanced Lesson Plan, students read Refugee to answer the question, “How does the concept of ‘invisibility’ connect Josef and Mahmoud’s stories today? Reread pages 192-197 to support your answer.” The teacher is provided with Key Understandings and Scaffolding Questions for Supporting All students, such as: “In what way is Mahmoud invisible? How does he feel about being invisible?”
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students practice speaking and listening skills with Discussion Questions in each lesson, which are “open-ended questions designed to prompt student reflection on the day’s reading and to make connections between the text, larger social issues, and their own lives. Discussion questions often come at the end of lessons and are an opportunity to bring students together to speak and listen to one another.” The protocols support students’ developing speaking and listening skills for a variety of discussions, including different formats of whole class, small group, and partner discussions. Each unit also includes a full day of Socratic Seminar discussion.
Materials provide teachers with many options for including discourse in the classroom and the freedom to choose which protocols are appropriate for their students. Instructional supports and protocols are available in the Enhanced Lesson Plans Building Background and Engagement section in those lessons that include a discussion that gives at least some guidance on how to conduct the discussion. There are also specific guidelines in the Socratic Seminar lessons that build from the first unit to the last in each grade showing a progression in building discussion skills. The skills and protocols are scaffolded for teachers and students to build greater mastery and student independence. The Teacher Tools includes resources for how to help engage students in discourse, create a classroom culture that supports conversation, and monitor student growth. The Academic Discourse section provides teachers with four different resources for guiding and supporting students in developing speaking and listening skills. These resources are referenced and linked consistently across the units.
Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, different types of protocols are provided. One example is a partner discussion, which includes the following protocol: Teachers choose from various discussion protocols to have students discuss open-ended questions, such as Think-Pair-Share:
“Students are given time to think before pairing up and sharing.
Teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion.
Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer.
Students pair up.
Students take turns sharing their answers.”
In each unit, a Socratic Seminar is provided as a formal discussion, and students use one teacher-chosen, open-ended question from the multiple Discussion Questions provided in the lesson. The same directions are provided for the teacher in the Notes section of each Socratic Seminar lesson: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 13, students read The Giver by Lois Lowry and answer Discussion Questions providing text evidence: “What do you think happens at the end of the book? Is this a satisfying ending? How do you know? Provide specific evidence from the text to support your position.” Teacher guidance for conducting a class discussion includes:
“(1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question.
(2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points.
(2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.
Extend the whole class to be seven minutes long.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 13, students “integrate information presented in different media or formats as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of topic or issue.” Students answer the discussion question, “Why does it matter that the work of women and artists of color is shown in museums?” Teacher guidance for conducting a class discussion includes:
“(1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question.
(2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points.
(2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.
This is an important question. So we see that this inquiry exists: Why should we care about it? Should it matter who is making the art that we enjoy?”
Over the course of the year, a systematic approach is used to develop speaking and listening skills through the Socratic Seminars in each unit. Examples of protocols that build mastery and independence include, but are not limited to:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham, Lesson 23, teachers introduce the Socratic Seminar and its purpose. Students read an overview of how the discussion will occur and brainstorm a list of expectations and rules. Suggested rules and expectations are included in the materials. Teacher guidance includes introducing a rubric, modeling a Socratic seminar through the use of videos and class discussion, and allowing students time to gather evidence to enhance their participation.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 15, students review the rules and expectations established in Unit 1 then go back to their self-reflection from Unit 1 to identify one thing they did well and would like to continue doing and one area to improve on in the Unit 2 discussion. Students gather evidence while the teacher circulates and assists students who may need help identifying appropriate evidence. There is a Discussion Graphic Organizer available for students who may need assistance with taking notes. Teacher guidance for conducting the seminar includes being certain that students understand they are to run the discussion themselves. The teacher takes notes throughout the discussion.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 18, students follow the same protocol as in Unit 2 allowing students to build on their previous reflections.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 20, students reflect on their past discussions. During the discussion, students summarize what the person before them said to ensure that students are listening. The teacher pauses the discussion to ask students to summarize ideas that have been presented in the discussion. In this lesson, instead of the teacher helping students, students use partner discussions to try out their ideas.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 19, students identify areas from the self-reflections to continue to do well and those to improve. The teacher reminds students of the rules and expectations for Socratic Seminars and students run the discussions. There are some supports for assisting students who struggle to identify evidence.
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse document outlines ways that teachers can “progress monitor and support students’ development of key conversation and discourse strategies.” The document includes other suggestions for support, such as:
“Provide sentence frames for students to use. Sentence frames should help students articulate their thoughts. Include sentence frames that use a variety of sentence structures to ensure that students have multiple options.
Provide scaffolding questions. If students are unable to initially answer the original question, provide scaffolding questions that build students to the deeper understandings.”
In the Teacher Tools, the Tiers of Academic Discourse resource provides an explanation of each tier. Tier 1 describes how students clarify and share their thoughts. Materials provide information on three elements of instruction: Key Student Discourse Strategies, Key Teacher Talk Moves, and Sentence Frames. In Tier 2, students engage with the thinking of others; as with Tier 1, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. In Tier 3, students critique and analyze the reasoning of others; as found in Tiers 1 and 2, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction.
In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse resource includes an Overview statement: “The goal is that by the end of the year, students will be able to participate in academic discourse using strategies from all three components, allowing them to show a deeper and more nuanced understanding of key content. Based on data from progress monitoring, students may need additional support in order to effectively orally communicate key ideas. Use the suggested supports below to decide which support to add for the whole-class or for sub-sets of students.” Materials provide teachers with the following downloadable tools to use in the classroom: Academic Discourse Rubric, Discussion Self Assessment, Discussion Peer Assessment, Socratic Seminar Recording Form, and End-of-Discussion Assessment.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 13, students answer the discussion question, “Why does it matter that the work of women and artists of color is shown in museums?” Teachers are provided with Suggested Supports:
Language Supports - Sentence frame(s):
If we only see art from white men in museums __________.
If more women and artists of color were shown in museums _______.
Even though __________.
What if we considered _________?
On the other hand, someone might argue ________.
Additional Supports - Scaffolding question(s):
Why is it important for people to see the work of artists who share aspects of their identity?
Why is it important for people to see the work of artists who do not share aspects of their identity?
What happens if only white men’s work is shown and/or purchased by museums?
Indicator 1H
Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate what they are reading through various speaking and listening tasks in all units. The speaking and listening activities all require evidence from unit texts. Many discussions require students to have read the texts in advance to identify the author’s argument, create their own claims, and provide enough evidence to support their claims. Lessons regularly include Discussion Questions that allow students to practice speaking and listening skills. Each unit includes a Socratic Seminar. Research and formal presentation activities require data and images and offer students opportunities to ask clarifying questions of peers and work cooperatively.
Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 24, students participate in a Socratic Seminar related to The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. The lesson objective states: “Take a clear position on a question and share evidence to support that point of view in a Socratic dialogue.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 21, students work with a small group to create a multimedia presentation about a contemporary female artist. The presentation must include at least three images of the artist’s major works of art. In Lesson 22, students present their work.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 23, students give digital presentations made with their groups. These presentations focus on educating classmates on a current refugee crisis. Students must include “accurate facts, statistics, and quotations from at least three reputable sources” and include multiple images or graphs. The Lesson Objective states students will use “appropriate volume, eye contact, emphasis, and pronunciation.”
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 24, after watching “3 Fears about screen time for kids—and why they're not true” by Sarah DeWitt, students discuss these questions: “Do you think that screens are a ‘necessity’ in our world today? Are some types of screens—TVs, computers, phones, e-readers, videos games—more necessary than others?” In the Enhanced lesson, additional notes are provided that include: “(1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question. (2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points. (2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.” Additional support includes: “Students will likely have a lot to say about this topic! Encourage them to listen to each other and ask questions. If many students are eager to talk, do a small group discussion first, and then open it up to the entire class. Encourage students to use at least 1-2 vocabulary words from the unit during the discussion. Post the vocabulary from the unit somewhere visible so they can reference it while talking.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 8, students watch the video, A Ballerina’s Tale by Nelson George and answer the Close Read question: “How do the interviews with other dancers from 00:19:16-00:23:04 help develop your understanding of race and racism in ballet? Why is it helpful to hear other dancers’ experiences?”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 20, students participate in a Socratic Seminar after reading The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton. The objective of the lesson includes “responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments and posing clarifying questions.” The Teacher Tools include support for the Tiers of Academic Discourse, including sentence frames “[to] question/clarify to fully understand classmates’ ideas.”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i.
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students complete on-demand prompts that connect to the discussions and activities for each lesson, and each unit includes process writing that spans more than one lesson. Specifically, students write longer essays to prompts that connect to core and supplemental texts using the steps of the writing process, including specific revision opportunities. In some units, students use digital resources to conduct research and create digital materials for presentations. The Teacher Tools include multiple resources with further details on how to provide guidance on both process and on-demand writing, including planning and executing writing lessons and strategies for giving feedback.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 10, students answer the on-demand Writing Prompt: “Why does Jonas have such a strong reaction to the game of ‘good guys and bad guys’—a game that he had played in the past? How has his perspective on the game changed? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text to support your answer.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 12, students watch a video of a dance performance and write “an analytical paragraph that determines the mood of the performance. Include a topic sentence, evidence from the text, analysis, and a conclusion in your argument.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 13, students complete an on-demand Writing Prompt relating to Refugee by Alan Gratz: “How are all three protagonists' stories today connected by the topic of generous strangers? Identify one scene in each character’s story and explain how it explores this topic. What message is Gratz trying to communicate by connecting their stories around this experience?”
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 27, the Objective states: “Provide meaningful feedback to a peer and incorporate feedback into own writing.” Students work with a partner to edit and review the current narrative writing project they are working on. Teachers can access the Teacher Tools section for the Giving Writing Feedback document that outlines options to help support peer conversation. The following sentence frames are included to encourage students to say something they liked, ask a question, and give a suggestion: “You did a good job with ____________ because ___________. I was confused by ____________. Can you explain what you were thinking? You might change ________________.”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lessons 16-19, students write an argumentative essay: “Is ignorance bliss? Write an essay in which you take a position on this question using evidence from The Giver to support your position. Use at least two of our vocabulary words in your essay.” Each of the lessons focuses on one aspect of process writing an essay, beginning with writing a strong thesis statement and body paragraphs and ending with editing for using “pronouns appropriately in writing.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 20-23, students write a four-paragraph argumentative essay. Each lesson focuses on one aspect of process writing an essay, beginning with writing a strong thesis statement through a concluding paragraph, ending with editing essays for lapses in tone and consistency. The materials provide the following guidance: “Some things to think about when writing analytically (formally):
Remove all examples of the first person (I believe, my evidence shows)
Limit the use of contractions
Eliminate any slang or colloquialisms
Limit the use of exclamation points
Ask students to review their own writing and remove any examples of informal writing. Then, have students complete any final edits and submit their essays.” the materials provide an additional section Supporting All Students and ask teachers to “Provide a non-example (an introduction that uses informal language) and ask students to identify ways in which the paragraph is informal and how that affects the argument.”Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 20, students research for a digital presentation about a contemporary female artist. Students include researched facts, works of art, and background information in the presentation and work with a partner or group to compile the research. Students cite their digital resources.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 20, students start a research project to educate their peers on a current refugee crisis. Students collect facts, statistics, data, and quotations from at least three sources and cite sources in the research project to meet the lesson objective of gathering information for “presentations from provided resources and those they have found online, differentiating between credible and non-credible sources.”
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.
Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different types of writing; however, the distribution does not reflect the requirements of the standards. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, though the percentage of informative and narrative lessons is less than the percentage of argumentative lessons, reflecting a 50/25/25 split. All writing assignments are text-specific or text-dependent and are connected to a unit theme and/or yearlong theme. The materials include explicit instruction in the different types of writing, though the instruction is not directly included in the teacher plans for each lesson. The resources are found in the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6-8) section. In addition, teacher support is offered for planning instruction and guiding student thinking with example answers in each lesson and Notes that highlight areas where students might struggle. These Notes include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support within and outside of the materials.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing, though they do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include an uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 50% argumentative, 25% informative, and 25% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is six argumentative, three informative, and three narrative.
In the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the writing instruction for argumentative and informational writing are grouped together.
The Persuasive/Argumentative Writing or Informational Writing section includes five sub-sections: Examine Evidence, Crafting a Thesis Statement, Structure a Body Paragraph, Writing Introductions and Conclusions, and Rhetorical Appeals. A mentor text is used for the majority of writing assignments. Instructions to help students write an introductory paragraph start with students studying the mentor text and answering questions as they read, such as “What is the purpose of an introduction?” Students return to the mentor text as they write.
In Giving Writing Feedback, Persuasive/Argumentative Writing Feedback, and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to create topic sentences that flow from the thesis statement; one “strategy is to work backwards through specific evidence to build the main claim and the topic sentences. This can also be modeled by:
selecting a particularly persuasive line of evidence from the research
building next to a topic sentence that would flow from that evidence
crafting a thesis statement that would include the subclaim from the topic sentence as part of the comprehensive argument”
In Giving Writing Feedback, Informational Writing Feedback, and Support, explicit instruction is included if students struggle to use transitional words, phrases, or clauses to manage the sequence of events, teachers can “Review and model how to use transitional phrases to manage the sequence of events.
Transitional words or phrases can be used to show there is a transition in time. (The next day, after a while, before long, late that afternoon, the next thing I knew, etc.)”
Transitional words and phrases can be used to show there is a transition in setting or location. (In our backyard, when we went upstairs, at the post office, behind the trees etc.)
Transitional words and phrases can be used to show a sequence of events, or to show the connection between events. (At the beginning, as a result, it started when, as soon as, in the end, etc.)”
In Teacher Tools, In the Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the Narrative Language section includes four sub-sections: Plot and Conflict, Language, Dialogue, and Conclusions. The Language section directs teachers to explicitly point out descriptive and sensory language in the mentor texts and suggest to students how they might include some of this language, such as mentioning that “Literary devices like similes, metaphors, and hyperbole are also a great way of drawing the reader into the text.” In Narrative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to develop a point of view or establish a context; teachers can prompt students to think about the following questions when brainstorming setting:
“What is the main location?
Are there any features of the main location that make it unique and should be highlighted?
Are there activities or occupations that are unique and/or important to the setting?
Does the setting influence the mood?
How does the setting influence the character’s actions?”
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 16, students complete a Writing Prompt where they are instructed to take a position on the claim “Is ignorance bliss?” and support their stance using evidence from the text. Students use a graphic organizer to organize their evidence. In Lesson 18, the objective is to edit for consistency and lapses in tone. The Teacher Tools Writing section includes documents that give teachers specific directions on how to assist students in creating and editing for formal style. For example, suggesting to teachers “First try prompting generally to see if the student can notice their own mistake. ‘Is this a complete sentence? Why or why not?’” when they are struggling with fragments. In Lesson 27, students continue writing an argumentative essay. This lesson specifically focuses on having students write an introduction and a conclusion for their essay.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 12, students analyze the development of mood in dance performance. Students write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Students practice the skill of using words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons as a supporting standard during the lesson. Also, in this lesson, students practice providing a concluding statement that follows from the argument presented as a supporting standard during the lesson.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & the Unwanted, Lesson 12, students write an argument around the question: “Do times of crisis bring out the best or the worst in people?” They take a position and support their claim with clear reasons and relevant evidence from the text Refugee by Alan Gratz. A Sample Response is available for the writing prompt. Also, in this lesson, students practice the skill of establishing and maintaining a formal style as a supporting standard during the lesson.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 21, students write a presentation where they choose a specific artist from a list of “contemporary female artists, the work they have created, and the impact they have made on contemporary culture.” Requirements of the presentation include information on “obstacles faced by the artist,” “the artist’s style,” “three of the artist’s major works of art,” “what is/was important to the artist,” and “the artist’s impact on contemporary culture.” In this specific lesson, students focus on logically organizing the information and all of the required components.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 21, students collect evidence and write an essay to explain whether Ponyboy from the novel The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton would agree with this proverb: “Everyone is kneaded out of the same dough but baked in a different oven.” In addition, students explain the meaning of this proverb. In the same lesson, students use the mentor text to analyze the introduction, searching specifically for the hook, the context, and the thesis statement to aid comprehension. They also analyze the mentor conclusion, searching specifically for the “why does it matter” statement and a statement where the author revisits the thesis statement to aid in comprehension. In Lesson 23, students draft their own introduction and conclusion for the essay. In Lesson 24, students edit their writing to ensure consistency in style and tone, joining ideas together where relevant.
In Unit 5, Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 20, students write a research presentation where they “work in small groups to create a digital presentation that educates your classmates on a refugee crisis currently taking place somewhere in the world.” The presentation must include “accurate facts, statistics, and quotations from at least three reputable sources.” In Lesson 22, students continue creating the presentation and “Logically organize the information in presentations, including all required components, and appropriately cite sources” and must include “at least four photographs, at least one map or graph/chart”. No instruction was found for using precise language, maintaining a formal style, or providing a conclusion.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 16, students begin writing a narrative by rewriting pages 177-179 in The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis from the perspective of Byron. Students are to include multiple items in their narratives and are given a mentor text to consult. Three items included in the list of “must haves” are “Establish setting”, “Establish a unique point of view based on what you already know of Byron”, and “Use precise words and phrases.” A Sample Response is available in the materials, and students can access the mentor text as a model. In Lesson 17, students continue writing the narrative. One requirement states, “Include important events, lines of dialogue, and characters from the original text.” In Lesson 18, students continue the narrative and use transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence and signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another as a supporting standard in the lesson. They also finish the narrative by providing a conclusion that follows the narrated experiences or events as a supporting standard in the lesson.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 16, students complete the Writing Prompt to “rewrite pages 177–179 from Byron’s perspective” from The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 16, students answer a Writing Prompt where they take a stance on whether or not ignorance is bliss. Students include evidence from the anchor text, The Giver by Lois Lowry, to support their stance.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 21, students consider whether one of the main characters from The Outsiders would approve of a particular proverb.
Indicator 1K
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.
Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited to teacher guidance such as a sample writing response. Students engage in close reading tasks, develop claims for an intended audience, and support their position with evidence. Evidence used throughout the units comes primarily from texts included in the materials and independent research at times. Writing opportunities connect purposefully to the texts students are reading, and the tasks provide a means for building knowledge and writing skills across the school year. Students practice utilizing claims and support consistently, and rarely is writing done simply based on opinion.
Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence; however, materials provide limited opportunities across the school year for students to learn about writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 22, students read the poem “The Ballad of Birmingham” by Dudley Randall and answer the Writing Prompt in a paragraph: “How does the mother character’s perspective most likely shift from the beginning to the end of the poem? How does the author develop the idea that her perspective has changed? Provide at least two pieces of specific evidence from the poem to support your answer.” The materials also provide sentence stems to help students support their thinking with evidence from the text: “At the beginning of the poem, the mother’s perspective on ___________ is _______________, but by the end of the poem, her perspective is ______________. “ Additional blanks are provided where students list evidence supporting the first and final perspectives. The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 8, students answer a Writing Prompt in which they provide a minimum of two pieces of evidence to support: “How does Lois Lowry develop the central idea in Chapter 13 that Jonas feels conflicted about the idea of people being able to make choices about their own lives?” A Sample Response is included for reference. In Lesson 9, additional supports include prompts for more practice: “What is the tone when The Giver says, ‘Forgive me’ on page 151? What words and phrases (in and around the sentence) help develop this tone?” The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 12, students read Refugee by Alan Gratz and answer the Writing Prompt in a paragraph: “Do times of crisis bring out the best or the worst in people? Philosophers have been pondering this question for millennia. Now it is your turn to take a position on this age-old question based on what you have read so far in Refugee by Alan Gratz. Consider the stories of the three young refugees in this story, their families, and the people they have encountered along their journeys, and write an analytical paragraph to answer this question. Include a topic sentence, evidence from the text, analysis, and a conclusion in your argument.” A brief lesson is included where the teacher explains that it is important for students to research both sides of an issue to determine which is the stronger position and add additional context related to the story. A graphic organizer that can be used to gather evidence for writing is also included.
Writing opportunities are focused on students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 16, students write an argument to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. The writing task provides an opportunity for students to draw evidence from the unit text The Giver by Lois Lowry. Students consider the question, “Is ignorance bliss?” The task requires students to “Write an essay in which you take a position on this question using evidence from The Giver to support your position. Use at least two of our vocabulary words in your essay.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 15, students read a website and two different articles on Jaune Quick-to-see Smith, synthesize the information and answer the Writing Prompt: “How do you think Jaune Quick-to-See Smith would answer the following question: ‘Why do you make art?’. Provide details from at least two sources to support your answer.” A Sample Response shows an example of one possible claim and how that claim could be supported. Additional scaffolding and questions include support for students as they analyze the texts from the Close Read and prepare their claims for the Writing Prompt.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 21, students begin working on a writing assignment that spans multiple lessons. The assignment asks students to take a stance on whether or not Ponyboy, a character from the book they’ve just read, The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton, would agree with the proverb, “Everyone is kneaded out of the same dough but baked in a different oven.” Students answer this question using the writing process, including evidence from the book to support their stance. Additional suggestions on where to find evidence include, “With these conversations in mind, students should reread the following passages: Pages 35-41, pages 115-118. Ask students to gather evidence as they read and fill out the following graphic organizer. Students should find at least three pieces of evidence for each column.”
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l.
Materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, and based on the information provided in the lessons, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The grammar standards are listed as core standards in the Standards Map, are referred to in some lesson objectives, and are named in writing rubrics; however, the guidance for educators is limited. Explicit instruction in the lessons is limited and does not ensure that students meet all the grade-level grammar and usage standards with the necessary support for application in context. In some writing lessons, Language Mini-Lessons are included where students have opportunities to notice how authors use language and its conventions; however, practice opportunities for students to learn and apply the skills are limited. In Teacher Support, the Writing section addresses grammar in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction: “Fishtank ELA units teach grammar and language in context by integrating grammar and mechanics with craft and analysis. Students see how grammar and language help authors communicate specific ideas, and then learn how to use the same techniques in their Before writing.” This section also provides tips and a blank graphic organizer for students to use to create an Editing Checklist. The Teacher Tools encourage educators to provide opportunities for progress monitoring, including thinking about questions from Mechanically Inclined, such as “What have I done to teach this grammar of mechanics pattern?” The Teacher Tools are general, connecting to all grade levels and units.
Materials include very limited explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards and few authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students have some opportunities to ensure that pronouns are in the proper case (subjective, objective, possessive). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 18, the objective states: “Use pronouns in their proper case” as they complete their final narrative draft. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson objective states: “Define pronouns and antecedents and complete sentences using the correct pronoun case.” Students review pronouns and antecedents before reviewing subjective, objective, and possessive case. Students practice identifying which pronoun to use and identify the antecedents for pronouns in given sentences.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 18, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Independent Writing section provides a 20-minute lesson on Formal Language with the following teacher guidance: “Explain to students the difference between formal and informal language. It is essential that students begin to self-monitor for formal style. Some things to think about when writing analytically (formally): Remove all examples of the first person ("I believe," "my evidence shows"), Limit the use of contractions, Eliminate any slang or colloquialisms, Limit use of exclamation points. Ask students to review their own writing and remove any examples of informal writing.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 19, the Enhanced Lesson Plan provides a Language Mini Lesson on subjective, objective, and possessive pronoun case. After a review of the uses of each case, students read a passage from Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland and locate all the pronouns and determine which are subjective, objective, and possessive. In Lesson 20, Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson provides practice on choosing the correct pronoun case (subjective, objective, possessive) to use in a paragraph from the text where the pronouns have been eliminated. Students compare their answers with the original passage from the text.
Students have minimal opportunities to use intensive pronouns. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 21, the objective states: “Logically organize the information in their presentations and include all required components.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.6.1.b, “Use intensive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves).” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, there is a Language Mini Lesson when students, “Define intensive pronouns.” In Lesson 22, standard L.6.1.b is listed as a core standard for the Lesson. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan the Language Mini Lesson states: “Incorporate intensive pronouns into writing.”
Students have minimal opportunities to recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and person. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 19, the objective states: “Use pronouns appropriately in writing.” However, standard L.6.1.c is not mentioned specifically in the lesson. In Lesson 29, the objective states that students should “Use pronouns appropriately in their writing and incorporate any changes suggested by the instructor.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.6.1.c and that they should “Recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and person.” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, the Language Mini Lesson objective states: “Identify vague pronouns and edit and revise vague pronouns so that the meaning is clearer.”
Students have minimal opportunities to recognize and correct vague pronouns (i.e., ones with unclear or ambiguous antecedents). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 19, the objective states: “Use pronouns appropriately in writing.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.6.1.d and that they should “Recognize and correct vague pronouns (i.e., ones with unclear or ambiguous antecedents).” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, Language Mini Lesson, students “[c]hoose between subjective/objective/possessive pronoun case to complete a sentence and identify how errors in pronoun case change a sentence’s meaning.”
Students have minimal opportunities to recognize variations from standard English in their own and others’ writing and speaking, and identify and use strategies to improve expression in conventional language. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 18, the objective states that students will “recognize and correct any lapses [in] tone” in their writing of an introductory paragraph. Guidance is minimal for the skill. Students self-monitor for formal style: “Ask students to review their own writing and remove any examples of informal writing. Add editing for formal vs. informal language to the class editing checklist and to individual editing checklists.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 2, the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes a Language Mini Lesson. The objective states: “Define and recognize the impact of slang and vernacular.” The teacher is provided with definitions for vernacular, patois, pidgin, dialect, and slang and told to define and explain to students. The teacher is also provided with words from the anchor text, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, and students determine the type of word each example is based on the definitions.
Students have minimal opportunities to use punctuation (commas, parentheses, dashes) to set off nonrestrictive/parenthetical elements. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 20, the objective states that students will “Begin to gather information for their presentations from provided resources and those they have found online, differentiating between credible and non-credible sources.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.6.2.a and that they should “Use punctuation (commas, parentheses, dashes) to set off nonrestrictive/parenthetical elements.” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, Language Mini Lesson, the objective states: “Discuss the stylistic differences between commas, parentheses, and dashes when using nonrestrictive/parenthetical elements.” Students read sentences from the text to help them understand the proper use of each. There are further mini-lessons in Lessons 21 and 22 to build understanding.
Students have minimal opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 11, the standard L.6.2.b is a supporting standard when students write a paragraph explaining how two different perspectives approach a similar topic. There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.
Students have minimal opportunities to vary sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 20, standard L.6.3.a is a supporting standard. Students work in small groups to compile and evaluate research for a digital presentation about an artist. There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.
Students have minimal opportunities to maintain consistency in style and tone. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 28, the objective states that students should “establish and maintain a formal style and use words to clarify their reasoning.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.6.3.b and that they will “Maintain consistency in style and tone.” There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 24, the objective states that students will “Edit for lapses in tone or consistency.” There is minimal guidance to support teachers and students with these skills with some reminders to ensure that the writing is formal rather than informal, such as “Remove all examples of the first person (I believe, my evidence shows).”
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.
Materials include a rationale for how vocabulary should be taught and how the publisher views vocabulary as part of a lesson. There is explicit instuction of the vocabulary that is essential to understanding the text within lessons. Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice with vocabulary words and definitions for each lesson, which consists of a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Vocabulary is included in some scaffolding questions and students have opportunities to apply the words in context. In addition, students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary. Teachers can assess some student learning around text-based vocabulary in each end of unit assessment. Some guidance is provided for how vocabulary is structured in the units, how to teach vocabulary, and how to support a range of learners during vocabulary instruction. The Enhanced Lesson Plans include a link to Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary; however, the guidance is not specific for the “priority vocabulary” words identified in the lesson, and other words included in the Supporting All Students section do not include a link and offer minimal guidance. The Teacher Tools share a brief overview: “Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic.” Students interact with vocabulary words through reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks. Teacher Tools include routines such as Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary and Implicit Instruction of Vocabulary.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit and lesson, vocabulary words are introduced before reading texts as necessary to understand the texts or the context surrounding them.
Within the units, vocabulary words are intentionally included in many ways, so students become familiar with them through repetition, such as the words being present in questions, used during discussions, and heard in teacher-provided sentence stems. Some words are revisited from previous lessons, and students are asked to use them to indicate authentic learning of the words. Sometimes, once the lesson where the word is taught is passed, the word is not revisited.
The Teacher Tools include Vocabulary guidance to share the two types of words in the materials: words to teach quickly and drop-in and words to study in-depth. The guidance includes instructions for teachers to “decide if the words are inferrable or not inferrable” and encourage learning vocabulary “indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines” rather than through explicit instruction.
The Vocabulary Teacher Tool shares the ways that students interact with vocabulary words within a lesson and across the unit, such as “Close reading moments are included within lessons to analyze the use of words in context” or “When applicable, vocabulary words are used in later units in key questions or as part of word banks and sentence frames.”
Materials include Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary guidance in the teacher tools section, which includes routines to introduce and review priority vocabulary. However, there is not sufficient guidance or reminders in the lesson plans themselves, to assist teachers.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Domain-specific vocabulary is taught across multiple units. For example:
Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze point of view/perspective.
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 2, students learn about point of view/perspective, which is defined as “1. a character’s opinion or feelings about a specific topic/idea/event; 2. the "lens" through which a person sees and understands the world. This is usually influenced by aspects of their identity, beliefs, and life experiences.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 9, students read a selection from Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland to explore Misty’s perspective on dancing and how that differs from others’ perspectives.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 5, students read a selection from The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown and study the author’s perspective/point of view by analyzing Brown’s perspective on “the world’s response to the Syrian refugee crisis.”
Across multiple units, students learn and analyze climax.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 5, climax is listed as a vocabulary word for the lesson, but the word is not used anywhere in the lesson, including Close Read questions. Other questions address pieces of a plotline such as rising action, but there are no instructions to specifically teach or reference it. Materials include a Key Understandings section and under the Knowledge heading, materials list the following as a key idea: “This section of text represents the beginning of the rising action.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 4, materials list climax as a vocabulary word. Students map out Chapters 1–4 of The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton on a “story mountain”; however, climax is not explicitly taught, referenced, or asked about.
Academic vocabulary words found in texts are introduced in units, but not always taught across multiple texts. For example:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 3, materials include the vocabulary word hostile with the following definition: “unfriendly; antagonistic.” In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 3, the vocabulary word hostile appears again with the following definition: “aggressive and unfriendly.”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 3, the objective states: “Determine the meaning of unknown words in The Giver and explain the impact of specific words and phrases on mood and tone.” Students complete Close Read questions that have them work to determine what words in the text mean based on context. Students determine what words like chastise mean and then look up the meaning in the dictionary.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, there are several words listed in the vocabulary list at the start of the unit that repeat throughout the unit. Words such as innovative and stereotype fit into all of the texts being discussed. Innovative is introduced and appears in the texts in Lesson 16 and repeats in lesson 17. For example, in lesson 17, students encounter the word again in the question “In what ways is the work of the Gee’s Bend Quilters innovative?” Stereotype is introduced in Lesson 6 and repeats in lessons 9 and 15. For example, in lesson 15, students encounter the word again in the question “What stereotypes did Smith have to overcome as she worked to become an artist?”
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a complete Vocabulary Glossary for each grade that notes the Part of Speech and Definition. The teacher can search for vocabulary words in the list, create a comprehensive list of all vocabulary words when “Select a Unit '' appears, and create a list for each individual unit by selecting a specific unit. The Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words are broken down into the following categories: text-based, root/affix, and academic. For example, in Unit 1, the text-based vocabulary words are conscience, conscientious, delinquent, disposition, emulate, enhance, hostile, incentive, juvenile, narcissist, prevalent, profound, trauma, vehement, vital, and wily. The roots/affixes include -ize. The academic vocabulary words are connotation, colloquial language, coming of age, dynamic, extended metaphor, figurative language, hyperbole, literary point of view, metaphor, mood, point of view/perspective, sensory, details, speaker, and stanza. Even though the words are introduced, none of the lessons include explicit instruction for how to teach the vocabulary and teachers are expected to remember to reference the teachers tools section for generic guidance. No specific words are identified as more critical than the others.
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
The grade 6 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming of age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. Although students practice writing, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction.
Throughout the program, the majority of instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned with the grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once.
The grade 6 materials provide the teacher with a clear pacing guide for the school year, and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
The grade 6 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming of age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards and include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. They also include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analytical skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts.
The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. While there is writing practice, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction. In addition, while the materials include research projects to build knowledge, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. Moreover, the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom but the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
Materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming-of-age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The Course Summary states that students “read texts that feature protagonists from diverse backgrounds, places, and time periods, all of whom face significant challenges as they struggle to define their identities and claim their place in the world. The stories of these young people are simultaneously unique and universal, and students will likely recognize parts of themselves in these texts, even as they are introduced to characters whose lives may initially look very different from their own.” Each unit begins with a clear statement of how that unit’s materials fit within the theme and what students will be learning. The theme is supported by Essential Questions that students explore; the texts explore literary characters’ coming of age and real-world stories and questions that build upon the initial theme. Students critically think about real-world applications of the theme in their own lives. The associated tasks connect to the theme and require students to demonstrate their understanding in various ways. The text sets, including informational texts, build knowledge on the theme and topic of each unit. They also build students’ content knowledge and ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Additional texts are available to build background on the theme and topic, but additional questions or tasks do not accompany most suggested texts.
Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry; texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, texts are organized around the unit theme of Developing Resilience and connect to the yearlong theme, “coming of age.” The materials state: “Students explore the topic of ‘coming of age’ through the story of an African-American boy growing up during the civil rights era, and his family's strong bond in the face of tragedy.”
In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “How do personal and historically significant events shape the way a person sees the world? How do family dynamics shape a person’s identity?”
The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “All experiences in a person’s life, both positive and negative, shape a person’s view of the world and of themself. Coming of age sometimes includes a loss of innocence—a realization that the world is less simple, kind, or fair than we previously believed.”
Throughout the unit, students read the core text and 13 supplemental texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are available.
In Lesson 1, students read the core text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis.
In Lesson 5, students read Chapters 5-6 in The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, and in the Enhanced Lesson Plan, Building Background and Engagement, Additional Supports, an additional text, “Welfare is a Woman’s Issue,” is suggested for students to read more about women and welfare to better understand the chapters.
In Lesson 8, students read Chapter 7 in the novel. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, Building Background and Engagement, Additional Supports, an explanation of why the additional texts are included states: “If you’re interested in learning more about the role that hair plays in the Black community, read the following articles: ‘Hair’ by Elizabeth Acevedo (Teaching Tolerance),’New Evidence Shows There's Still Bias Against Black Natural Hair’ by Karen Grigsby Bates (NPR), ‘The Racial Roots Behind The Term 'Nappy' by Michael Paulino (NPR).” Another example included as additional support is: “If you or your students would like to learn more about racism against Asians, you can read the following articles: ‘Why We Must Talk About the Asian-American Story, Too’ by Brando Simeo Starkey (The Undefeated), ‘The Coronavirus Exposes the History of Racism and 'Cleanliness'’ by Nylah Burton (Vox).”
In Lesson 21, students read the supplemental nonfiction article, “‘Segregation Forever’: A Fiery Pledge Forgiven, But Not Forgotten” and view three photographs to explain the impact of the article.
In Unit 3, texts are organized around the unit theme of Expressing Yourself and the yearlong theme, “coming of age.” The materials state, “Students explore the topic of ‘coming of age’ through stories about the experiences of professional female artists of color who have fought to claim their space in a world that has long excluded people who look like them.”
In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “Why do people make art? Why does an artist’s identity matter? What are some of the obstacles female artists—and specifically female artists of color—encounter?
The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “Women and minority artists have historically faced many obstacles to their success, and the fight against prejudice and discrimination in the art world continues today. Art is a powerful way to express oneself and one’s own identity, and can be a platform for an artist to communicate their unique perspective to the world. All people benefit from the inclusion of more diverse voices in the art world.”
Throughout the unit, students read the core text and 13 supplemental texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts and videos are offered.
In Lesson 1, students begin reading the core text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina, by Misty Copeland, who encounters many experiences as a ballerina of color that lead to her coming of age in the world of professional dance. Knowledge students gain connects to the Essential Questions in the unit, including “Misty Copeland is an African American ballerina who is famous for breaking barriers within ballet; Copeland’s performance as the first Black woman to play the Firebird is historically and personally significant.” A lesson on the structure of a memoir and how it differs from a biography or autobiography is also included. Questions that support the reading include, but are not limited to: “What is the purpose of the prologue in a text? Why does Copeland most likely begin her memoir describing a day when she is twenty-nine—and not from the very beginning of her life? Carefully explain your thinking. How old is Copeland in this prologue? How old is she in the first chapter of the text? What idea does Copeland develop on pages 2 to 3 about the difference between having good technique and being a true artist on stage? Provide one line of text that best supports your answer.”
In Lesson 8, students watch a documentary, A Ballerina’s Tale, directed by Nelson George. Students answer Close Read Questions which connect to the enduring understandings of the unit, such as “How do the interviews with other dancers from 00:19:16-00:23:04 help develop your understanding of race and racism in ballet? Why is it helpful to hear other dancers’ experiences?”
In Lesson 13, students “[d]escribe gender and racial discrimination in the art world, and how the Guerrilla Girls have responded to this issue through art and activism.” Students read the article “The Guerrilla Girls: We upend the art world’s notion of what’s good and what’s right” by Nadja Sayej and the video “Guerrilla Girls – You Have to Question What You See” by TateShots by Tate.
In Unit 5, texts are organized around the unit theme of Fleeing Conflict and the yearlong theme, “coming of age.” The materials state, “Students explore the topic of ‘coming of age’ through the stories of young refugees from different time periods, all of whom face unthinkable hardships as they desperately seek safety.”
In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “Why do people make the decision to flee their homes and seek refuge elsewhere, and what are they willing to sacrifice to find safety? How do people respond when they see others in need? What does it mean to ‘come of age’ during times of crisis and war?”
The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme:
“Refugees are people who choose—or are forced—to flee their homes because of war, political unrest, violence, or persecution. Currently, there are millions of refugees around the world—the highest number in recorded history.
The Syrian civil war has sparked one of the largest refugee crises in recent history as many millions of people have left the war-torn country seeking refuge and asylum elsewhere.
Refugees often face extreme hardships and even risk death in their search for safety for themselves and their families.
The response to refugees can vary widely; some individuals and governments are welcoming, while others are unwelcoming or even hostile to those who seek their help.”
Throughout the unit, students read the two core texts and two other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are offered.
In Lesson 2, students read The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown and the website How to Read Comics by Tracy Edmunds. Students connect to the Essential Questions when considering the reason why the Syrian refugees flee their homes. For example, students answer the Writing Prompt: “Why did many people make the decision to flee their homes and leave Syria? Provide evidence from both the text and images to explain your answer.”
In Lesson 8, students read Refugee by Alan Gratz to gain knowledge that “Mahmoud’s whole family survives the bombing, but his father decides that they need to leave Syria immediately.” Additionally, students watch the first three minutes of the video, “Cuban rafters: 20 years after the crisis” by the Miami Herald. Questions support students in a turn-and-talk activity to enhance their understanding of the text. There are multiple Close Read and supporting questions, such as: “How does Isabel’s father respond when he believes that the police are chasing him and that his life is at risk? Provide evidence from pages 63 through 65 to support your answer, and carefully explain your thinking. What is Isabel’s father doing right before he sees the police coming toward the boat? What does he do immediately when he thinks they are chasing him? How does Josef respond to the experience of having a Bar Mitzvah? How has the experience changed him? Provide evidence from pages 77 through 80 and carefully explain your thinking.”
In Lesson 10, students continue their reading of Refugee by Alan Gratz and “Explain how Refugee can be considered a ‘coming-of-age’ novel and describe how each of the three protagonists are changing as the text progresses.” The reading and activities connect to the overall grade level theme and the Essential Questions for the unit.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards. Students determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular key ideas and details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments; and analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes). Materials include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also provides additional scaffolding questions. Students analyze craft and structure according to grade-level standards, such as determining the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyzing how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas; and determining an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text. These skills are systematically built over the course of the unit through increasingly complex Close Reading Questions, Discussion Questions, and Writing Prompts to complete the Socratic Seminar and Content Assessment.
For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, students participate in a Socratic Seminar about the main ideas and themes from The Watsons Go to Birmingham -- 1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis.
In Lesson 1, students answer a Writing Prompt about the big ideas introduced in the first chapters: “How does Momma and Dad's discussion of Birmingham (and the American South more generally) help to establish the setting of The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963?” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides Additional Supports in the Supporting All Students section that support key ideas and details: “Ask students to point out the differences between Flint and Birmingham that are established in this section of text, and then to think about what they learn about each place based on comparison. If students are stuck, tell them to look for details between pages 4 and 6.” There are also sentence stems that are included: “Momma and Dad’s discussion helps to establish the setting because _____________. The setting of the story is important because ________________. An example the author includes is __________________. This detail is important because _______________.”
In Lesson 4, students show how the story unfolds by answering the Writing Prompt: “How and why do Kenny’s feelings toward Larry Dunn change over the course of this chapter? Support your answer with two pieces of specific evidence from the text.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional support for each close read question, including Key Understandings, Scaffolding questions, and Moments to Analyze. For example “Key Understandings: This demonstrates that Kenny is a thoughtful friend, and while he might be ‘sneaky’ he is doing it for the right reason. Scaffolding Questions: Why does Kenny ‘trick’; his Momma? How do you think Kenny's mother would have reacted if she knew what he had done with the gloves? Why is Kenny willing to risk getting in trouble? Moments to Analyze: ‘I figured that if I told Momma I'd lost my first pair she'd give me the second pair and me and Rufus each would have a full pair of gloves’ (p. 56) ‘I looked sad on the outside but on the inside I was feeling great’ (p. 56).”
In Lesson 12, students answer the Writing Prompt with key ideas: “Write a 5–6 sentence objective summary of Chapter 9 of The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963.” The lessons build knowledge of the novel and support students to participate effectively in the Socratic Seminar.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, students complete a research-based presentation about a female artist and the impact that their work has had on contemporary culture. Throughout the second part of the unit, students focus on determining the central ideas of multiple texts and how those ideas are conveyed through details.
In Lesson 13, students answer a series of questions about the informational texts they read, and the Writing Prompt states: “Based on what you have read and watched today, how do you think the Guerilla Girls would answer the following question: ‘What do you hope to see in the future in the art world?’ Support your answer with at least one piece of evidence/ example from the article and/or the video.”
In Lesson 15, the same pattern is followed with the Writing Prompt: “Based on the sources you have read and watched today, how do you think Jaune Quick-to-See Smith would answer the following question: ‘Why do you make art?’ Provide details from at least two sources to support your answer.”
In Lesson 17, the same pattern is followed with the Writing Prompt: “Based on the sources you have read and watched today, how do you think Favianna Rodríguez would answer the following question: ‘Why do you make art?’ Provide details from both sources to support your answer.” The repetitive practice with different types of informational texts related to the same ideas gives students a chance to develop their skills with different scenarios and use them in the culminating task when they conduct their own research and create a presentation. The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional supports for the Close Read Question: “How does the format/medium of the art that Rodríguez makes reflect her beliefs about art and politics? Provide details from both sources to support your answer.” In the Supporting All Students section, the following Scaffolding Question(s) are available: “What kind of art does Rodríguez make? What medium does she use?” Key Moment to Analyze are available in the Supporting All Students section such as, “Printmaking through social justice history has been a tool that artists have used to expose the truth, to fight for justice (‘Printmaking with Favianna Rodríguez’ 1:39-2:00).”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students determine themes in multiple texts.
In Lesson 7, students complete tasks to “Determine the theme of ‘Nothing Gold Can Stay’ and explain how poet Robert Frost uses literary devices to develop that theme.” Students answer the Writing Prompt: “What is the theme of the poem, ‘Nothing Gold Can Stay’? How does Robert Frost develop this theme? Support your answer with specific words and phrases from the poem.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional questions in the Close Read section, such as: “What are the connotations of the word ‘gold’? What is the poet saying figuratively about the ‘first green’? What are the connotations of the word ‘flower’? What is the poet saying figuratively about the leaves? What is the tone of the poem? How does the speaker seem to feel about the fact that ‘nothing gold can stay’? What words and phrases does the poet use to communicate this tone?” The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes questions in the Target Task section, including “What is the theme of the poem, ‘Nothing Gold Can Stay’? How does Robert Frost develop this theme? Support your answer with specific words and phrases from the poem.”
In Lesson 14, students identify themes in The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton and explain how the author develops those themes. The Objective states, “Identify themes in The Outsiders and explain how Hinton develops these themes in Chapter 12. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, guidance is available: “While engaging with the Close Read Questions, circulate to gauge students’ understanding of the questions and text.” In the Supporting All Students section under Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge is the following: “Theme: an essay” and “Language Supports: Read pages 178 and 179 aloud with students. It’s important that students fully understand what Johnny says in his letter, and Ponyboy’s reflection afterwards.”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 2, students analyze how a particular sentence, chapter, scene, or stanza fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the theme, setting, or plot (RL.6.5). Students focus on explaining how “specific words, sentences, and passages in the first two chapters of The Giver help establish the setting.” A series of Close Read Questions include:
“Read the first two pages of the text. What sentence of the text first indicates to the reader that Jonas’ world is different from our own? Explain how this specific sentence demonstrates the difference between the two worlds.
“Select two details from pages 6-8 and carefully explain how they help to establish the setting of the book.”
How does the family’s discussion of the newchild on pages 9–11 help to establish the setting? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text, and explain your thinking.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes Key Understandings for students to better grasp craft and structure: “In Jonas's community, newchildren (babies) live together with caregivers for the first year of their lives, instead of with families. Families in Jonas's community only have two children, a boy and a girl.”
The materials provide additional opportunities to practice the same skills with the same core text in Lessons 5, 6, and 13. In Lesson 22, students read the informational text, “Kids Must Learn to Control Their Own Screen Time” by John Kielman, and answer questions such as, “Read the third paragraph of the essay. What is the purpose of this paragraph? How does it contribute to the development of ideas in the essay?”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 1, students “Explain how S.E. Hinton begins to develop the narrator’s point of view in The Outsiders”( RL6.6). Students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does Hinton develop the idea that the way others see him (and greasers in general) affects the way Ponyboy feels about himself? Provide two pieces of evidence from chapter 1 to support your answer, and be sure to explain your thinking.” In Lesson 3, students analyze how the author develops Ponyboy’s point of view in a series of Close Read Questions: “How does Cherry view greasers? Does Ponyboy share her point of view? Provide two pieces of evidence from pages 37- 38. How does Ponyboy’s perspective of his family differ from the way Johnny sees it? How does Ponyboy’s beliefs about his family impact his behavior? Provide two pieces of evidence from page 42 and page 51 to support your answer and explain how the author develops their differing perspectives.”
The Enhanced Lesson Plan, Supporting All Students section includes further Scaffolding Questions: “How does Cherry describe the greasers? Does Cherry believe that the greasers are better or worse than the Socs? How does she describe the Socs? Does Cherry think that being ‘sophisticated’ is a good thing? Does Hinton develop her perspective through words, actions, or thoughts?”
Additional opportunities to consider point of view are available in Lessons 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13, connecting to the same core text.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students create a group informational presentation on a current refugee crisis somewhere in the world while reading Refugee by Alan Gratz and The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown. To develop the skills for this research and presentation, students practice the reading skills of understanding the text by looking at how information is developed and built over the course of the text.
In Lesson 2, students answer Close Read Questions to analyze how the author builds the ideas in the texts, such as: “How do pages 2 through 5 develop your understanding of the setting? Why did Brown most likely open the text with these images? Support your answer with specific details from these pages. How does Brown use text and images on pages 8-9 to communicate the public’s response to the imprisonment of the Dara’a boys? Provide at least two details from these pages to support your answer.”
In Lesson 6, students answer questions to help them understand the structure of the text and how the author is using that to build and support ideas, such as: “How do pages 5-6 develop the reader’s understanding of the conflict in Josef’s story? Provide specific details from the text to support your answer and carefully explain your thinking” and “How does the second chapter help to develop the setting of Isabel’s story? Provide specific details from the text to support your answer and carefully explain your thinking.”
In Lesson 10, students answer a series of questions to support their understanding of how specific scenes contribute to changes in the characters and the plot: “What is the significance of Mahmoud’s decision to stop the car in the middle of the street and ask for help? What does this reveal about his character and how he has changed? Provide evidence from pages 125 through 128 to support your answer. What is the significance of Josef’s decision to slap his own father? What does this reveal about his character and how he has changed? Provide evidence from pages 132 through 135 to support your answer, and use the word ‘idolize’ in your response. What is the significance of Isabel’s decision to jump into the water after Señor Castillo? What does this reveal about her character? Provide evidence from pages 136 through 139 to support your answer.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional supports to answer the questions in the Supporting All Students section: “What is the significance of Mahmoud’s decision to stop the car in the middle of the street and ask for help? What does this reveal about his character and how he has changed? Provide evidence from pages 125 through 128 to support your answer. Scaffolding Questions: How did Mahmoud react to dangerous situations in the past? (consider when he saw the boy getting beat up on the street and when the fighters stopped their car). What problem is Mahmoud’s family facing? What does Mahmoud decide to do about the problem? How does his family respond to this decision? How does Mahmoud respond to his parents’ response? Why does Mahmoud make the decision to ignore his father? What is the outcome of Mahmoud’s actions? Key Understandings include: Mahmoud’s decision to stop the car and ask for help —even though his parents tell him repeatedly not to— reveals that he is willing to do anything to protect his family. His decision means that they are offered a safe, dry place to sleep.”
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.
Materials include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analytical skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts. The questions help students in the successful completion of the culminating tasks, such as Socratic Seminars.
Throughout the units, students analyze a series of big ideas using the knowledge they have built throughout the unit. This is evaluated in one, and sometimes both, of the culminating tasks at the end of the unit. In all units, students read a variety of texts that center around the theme and central idea of the unit. They use the different texts to convey their understanding in the culminating tasks.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 21, students analyze a text set that includes an article, “‘Segregation Forever’: A Fiery Pledge Forgiven, But Not Forgotten” and three photographs. Students answer a Writing Prompt about how the images help “develop your understanding of the impact of segregation on African Americans in Alabama.” Later in the lesson, Close Read Questions expand this line of questioning into how the images help students understand the impact of segregation in the South. Students use the context knowledge from the article and photographs about segregation in the South, particularly in Alabama, to support their understanding of the historical context in The Watsons Go to Birmingham–1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. During the Socratic Seminar culminating task, students can reference the information from the text set to support their dialogue about the impacts historical events can have on individuals.
The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional supports for each Close Read question. In Key Takeaways, supports state, “Segregation impacted many aspects of life, from restaurants to cleaning services. These photos suggest that African Americans were thought of as unworthy of sharing the same facilities with white Americans.” Scaffolding Questions include: “What do you notice in these photographs? What is the setting of these photos? Why do you think that this laundry company was only willing to take clothing from white people? What does this reveal about their beliefs? What aspects of life did segregation affect? How do these photos make you feel? How do these photos help us better understand what happened in The Watsons Go to Birmingham?”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 15, students participate in a Socratic Seminar where they discuss the concepts of a dystopia, the sacrifice of identity for peace, and coming of age. The texts help students build an understanding of the ideas through completing questions, discussions, or writing tasks.
In Lesson 1, students watch a video, “How to recognize a dystopia - Alex Gendler” by TED-Ed, and read the article, “Dystopias: Definition and Characteristics” by ReadWriteThink about the genre of dystopia. The Close Read Question asks, “How did events in the real world lead to the development of the genre of dystopia? Support your answer with examples from the video.” The writing prompt asks, “What is the purpose of dystopian fiction? Support your answer with examples from the video.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan in the Supporting All Students section, contains additional Scaffolding Questions including: “What are some of the characteristics of a dystopian society? How are they different from the society you live in? What are the different types of dystopian controls? What are corporations? What is corporate control? What is bureaucracy? What is bureaucratic control? What is technology? What is technological control? What is philosophical/religious control?”
In Lesson 7, the Discussion Question asks, “What is your reaction to the idea of Climate Control and ‘sameness’? Do you see any benefits of these systems? What are the downsides?”
In Lesson 12, the writing prompt asks, “After witnessing the release of the newchild, Jonas and The Giver decide that Jonas must leave the community. Why does this event convince Jonas that this is the only way forward? In your response, be sure to answer the following questions: How will leaving the community benefit Jonas? How will Jonas’ leaving benefit the community? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text to support your answer.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan, Supporting All Students section identifies sections of the text for students to closely read. Direct quotes from the text with the page numbers are provided, such as: “Jonas, you and I are the only ones who have feelings. We’ve been sharing them for almost a year.”
These activities throughout the novel support students in building a foundational knowledge of both the dystopian genre and the ideas found in the novel that correlate with the genre.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 4, students complete tasks and a series of questions connecting to the reading of The Unwanted: Stories of the Syrian Refugees by Don Brown. Students integrate information presented in different media or formats, as well as in words, to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue. Students deepen their understanding with Close Read Questions: “How does Brown develop the reader’s understanding of what this time is like for young Syrians, whether they live in Syria or as refugees? Provide examples from pages 52 through 54 to support your answer. How does Brown use illustrations on page 57 to develop the reader’s understanding of what it is like to live in refugee camps? Provide specific details from these images to support your answer.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides additional supports.
Scaffolding Questions in the Supporting All Students section include: “Does Brown provide examples/anecdotes? Does Brown provide statistics/data? Does Brown provide quotations? Does Brown provide images/illustrations? What do the text and images on page 52 depict/communicate? Page 53? Page 54? How does the quote (in the speech bubble) on page 52 develop the reader’s understanding of the refugee experience? How do the quotes on page 53 develop the reader’s understanding of young people’s experiences in Syria? Who is depicted in these panels? What do you notice about people’s body language and facial expressions on these pages? What is the impact of seeing the woman with her head in her hands? What is the impact of the illustration of the man looking out through the fence? How does this communicate the emotional experience of living in a camp? What is the mood of these panels?”
Key Understanding includes:
Brown develops the idea that life is extremely difficult both for refugee children and those still living in Syria. None of the children on these pages are attending school.
Illustrations: unregistered refugee children working in fields, mopping, doing dishes, while children in Syria are shown running through a bombed out city on the way to or from school.
Quotes show their fear and desperation: one describes why he must work, the other why fear of bombs drove them to drop out of school. “
Brown provides "snapshots" of the people living in these camps. They all look tired, afraid, hopeless.
The materials also offer Language Supports, including the following Sentence Stems:
“Brown uses _____________ to develop the idea that ______________. For example, ____________.
The illustrations show ______________, which helps the reader understand refugee camps because _____________.”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 11, students practice their skills to compare and contrast texts in different forms or genres (e.g., stories and poems; historical novels, and fantasy stories) in terms of their approaches to similar themes and topics. The questions and tasks connect to two texts, the poem “The Children's Hour” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow and the core text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. Students answer Close Read Questions including the following: “How is the passage on page 104 in The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 similar to ‘The Children’s Hour’? What topic do they both share? The Enhanced Lesson Plan, Supporting All Students section, includes support for the Close Read that includes:
Key Takeaways: “Both address the topic of parent/child relationships and the love, playfulness, and affection they feel for one another.”
Scaffolding Questions: “Who are the characters in both of these texts? How are they similar? What is the mood in each of these texts? How are they similar?”
Moments to Analyze:
“Then Dad pulled one of his famous tricks on me. He said, ‘Kenny, look!’ and pointed out in the hallway. Even before I could think my head turned around and I followed Dad's finger. When I saw nothing, and looked back Dad was smiling a mile a minute, acting like he hadn't done anything but I noticed that his toothbrush was gone (p. 104).
A whisper, and then a silence: Yet I know by their merry eyes They are plotting and planning together To take me by surprise. A sudden rush from the stairway, A sudden raid from the hall! By three doors left unguarded They enter my castle wall!
Language Supports: Use the word ‘profound’ in your response. Both texts are similar because ________________. For example, _______________.”
Students complete the Target Task around the following question: “How do
Christopher Paul Curtis and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow use different narrative
perspectives to communicate a similar idea about the relationship between
children and their parents? Provide specific evidence from both texts to support
your answer and explain your thinking.”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 25, the Writing Prompt asks students to take a position: “What are the benefits and downsides of parents limiting their children’s screen time?” The prompt states: “Create a poster of a pros/cons chart, listing at least three reasons on each side of the argument, providing evidence from the texts to support each reason. Cite your sources using MLA format.” To be able to answer the prompt, students various texts and answer questions to build knowledge:
In Lesson 8, students answer the writing prompt, “How does Lois Lowry develop the central idea in Chapter 13 that Jonas feels conflicted about the idea of people being able to make choices about their own lives? Provide at least two pieces of evidence that demonstrate this conflict.”
In Lesson 15, one of the questions in the Socratic Seminar asks, “Is it worth sacrificing freedom, choice, and individuality for peace, contentment, and ease?”
In Lesson 21, students read two different articles about the impact of screens on children and answer Discussion Questions, “If you were a parent, do you think you would put limits on your children’s screen usage? Why or why not? Has anything you have learned about over the last two days influenced your answer to this question?”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 8, students compare their previous reading of a portion of the memoir Life In Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland to the film version, A Ballerina’s Tale directed by Nelson George. Students answer questions such as, “What do you now understand about Misty Copeland and her life that you did not understand from simply reading her memoir? Provide at least two things you learned or understand better as a result of watching this documentary.” Other questions ask how interviews help viewers better understand the issue of racism in ballet. Additional questions include:
“How is Copeland’s story of first connecting with Susan Fales-Hill (p. 181–182) different from the story Fales-Hill tells (00:15:02–00:16:45) in the documentary? What do we learn from the documentary that we did not learn from the text?
How do the interviews with other dancers from 00:19:16–00:23:04 help develop your understanding of race and racism in ballet? Why is it helpful to hear other dancers’ experiences?”
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
Materials include culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. One type of culminating task is a Content Assessment that “pushes students to synthesize unit content knowledge or unit essential questions orally or in writing” and “should be used as the primary assessment because it shows mastery of unit content knowledge and standards.” Content Assessments are found at the end of each unit and include three sections that include vocabulary questions, multiple choice and/or short answer questions connected to excerpts from multiple texts in the unit, and an essay connected to the same texts. In addition to the Content Assessment, culminating tasks within each unit include Socratic Seminars, essays, and presentations. The culminating tasks connect in a meaningful way to the unit themes and essential questions. The questions and tasks in each lesson that are connected to texts and research opportunities scaffold students towards the successful completion of the culminating task. For example, Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions provide opportunities for students to explore the topic and themes to demonstrate their understanding. The culminating tasks offer some variety for students since Teacher Tools offer different types of academic discourse, and the questions vary according to the unit texts and themes. The guidance is general in the Teacher Tools that connects across Grades 6–8.
Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lessons 24–27, students write a memoir as one culminating task. In Lesson 24, the Writing Prompt states: “Write a short memoir about an important event in your own life.” The Objective states that students “analyze a mentor text in preparation for writing a memoir.” Throughout this culminating task, the teacher walks students through the process of writing a memoir using the mentor text. In Lesson 28, in the Content Assessment Section 3, after reading What the Moon Saw by Laura Resau, students complete an essay for the following prompt: “You have read the excerpt from What the Moon Saw, which is written from Clara’s [point of view]. Rewrite the excerpt from the perspective of one of her grandparents. Your essay should reflect a strong understanding of the passage, but also demonstrate your own creativity and originality, and your understanding of strong narrative writing. Additionally, you should include one of the following words/phrases in your narrative: coming-of-age; conscientious; perspective; hostile; vehement; narcissist.” Students use a combination of reading, writing, and language skills to complete these culminating tasks. To build the skills necessary to complete the memoir, students practice skills in other lessons, such as:
In Lessons 6–8, students write a summary of an informational text. Teacher guidance under the Skills and Strategies section for these lessons specifies that students should: “Identify the most significant people, events, and settings in shorter and longer sections of text; omit unnecessary details from summaries; maintain a consistent level of detail in a summary; write with objectivity” building skills necessary for writing their memoir.
In Lesson 10, students evaluate the impact of literary devices and how they help develop mood and meaning in writing. Specific skills addressed include: identifying the connotations of words, identifying mood, explaining how mood is developed, identifying metaphors and explaining what is being compared, explaining what a metaphor is trying to communicate, providing strong evidence to support an answer, and explaining how the evidence supports their assertions.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, students read multiple texts related to female artists, specifically, how different aspects of life impact art and how art impacts different aspects of life. In Lesson 18, students participate in a Socratic Seminar as one culminating task with a provided series of questions. In the homework for Lesson 17, students are directed to “prepare for tomorrow’s Socratic Seminar.” Students answer preparation questions such as, “What does it mean to be an artist? Consider all of the artists we studied in this unit. Does a person’s life experience influence the art that they make? What impact does making art have on a person’s life?” In Lessons 19–22, students complete another culminating task to research a contemporary female artist and create a group presentation that fulfills these requirements:
“Provides a biography on the artist, including any obstacles faced by the artist and a photograph of the artist;
Describes the artist’s style;
Describes at least three of the artist’s major works of art, with images;
Reveals what is/was important to the artist;
Reports on the artist’s impact on contemporary culture.”
This project requires students to use information learned earlier in the unit to inform their research and presentation. Over the course of the project, students practice language, writing, and speaking and listening skills. In Lesson 23, students complete the Content Assessment that includes writing three informational paragraphs that provide a biography of the artist detailed in the passage read, a description of the work, and what is important to the artist. In Lessons 14–17, students read texts on various female artists and explain how their backgrounds influence their perspectives and art. To build the skills necessary to complete the culminating tasks, students practice the skills in earlier lessons in the unit. In Lesson 2–7, students read Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland and identify different obstacles that stood in her way as she worked to achieve success and how she overcame them.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 19, students participate in a Socratic Seminar for the culminating task. In the discussion, students refer to the unit texts including The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, and any other unit texts that they may have gathered additional knowledge on the topic of social class and stereotypes as they present ideas and use evidence from the texts to support their ideas. Teachers determine what type of discourse students will use and present questions, such as, “What message is this book trying to communicate about social class? How does Ponyboy change over the course of the text? What about him does not change?” Speaking and Listening standards are assessed through these activities. In Lessons 20–23, students write a four-paragraph essay explaining whether they believe that Polyboy would agree with the proverb, “Everyone is kneaded out of the same dough but baked in a different oven.” This task requires the development and utilization of the skills needed to complete the Content Assessment including making a claim, writing an introduction, citing evidence to support a claim, and writing a conclusion. In Lesson 24, students complete the Content Assessment which includes a task where they read “The War of the Wall” by Toni Cade Bambara and write a four-paragraph essay on the following prompt: “First impressions are always unreliable -- Franz Kafka. In a four-paragraph essay, explain whether you think that the narrator of ‘The War of the Wall’ would agree with this quote. Write a strong introduction and conclusion and provide sufficient evidence from the text to support your answer.” The content assessment addresses several Reading: Literature and Writing standards. The task connects to the theme and essential questions in the unit, such as, “How do stereotypes and prejudices influence the way we see others and ourselves.” To build on the skills for the culminating tasks, students practice the skills in earlier lessons in the unit, such as in Lesson 3, students focus on identifying a character’s perspective and articulating how it has changed including identifying “strong” evidence that demonstrates the perspective and how the evidence supports the claim. These are essential skills in identifying how Ponyboy changes over time.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.
Materials include frequent writing opportunities and address different types of writing to support students’ writing development; however, materials miss opportunities for explicit writing instruction and lesson guidance. Students practice writing in every lesson, and student directions for tasks encourage them to use tools, such as graphic organizers, checklists, and rubrics to help them brainstorm, organize, and edit their writing. Materials include different types of writing tasks that are embedded in the curriculum, connecting to the topics and texts students are studying. Writing opportunities include short written responses, research projects, presentations, and longer writing tasks. Many lessons include the practice of essential writing skills to meet grade-level standards; however, explicit connections to the standards and guidance to assist students in their learning and completion of the writing tasks are lacking. Student writing lessons at the beginning of the year provide appropriate scaffolds and structure in the design of the lesson prompt and correlating materials. Materials include new and more challenging writing tasks with less or no scaffolds as students gain more writing independence.
Teacher guidance includes protocols to support teachers in implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. General guidance is found in the Teacher Tools, such as Instructional Strategies for Writing Lesson (6–8), which is a separate resource. More specific guidance is provided in the Progress Monitoring and Assessment Teacher Tool which includes a tool for teachers to reflect and decide upon which assignments, including writing assignments, they will monitor and what they will look for within those assignments. The Formative Assessment portion of this tool includes a section on scoring and responding to the Target Tasks and the Writing Assignments. For the Target Tasks, which are daily argumentative writing assignments for Grades 6–8, a rubric is included. For the Writing Assignments, some guidance on what to monitor is provided, as well as a link back to the Giving Writing Feedback tool. Each lesson plan includes the Enhanced Lesson Plan that provides many writing supports for teachers.
Materials include some writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All units and lessons include opportunities for students to write in some form. Throughout each unit, each lesson plan begins with a Writing Prompt. The answers expected for each prompt vary in length, with all questions relating to the lesson texts. A smaller project incorporates writing within the first third of each unit. These are assignments such as analytical paragraphs or research presentations. At the end of each unit, students complete a full process writing assignment that spans multiple lessons. Students learn about the mode of writing being used and collect evidence, brainstorm, write a draft, edit, and publish their final papers. The materials almost always include sample answers and mentor texts as well as specific ways for teachers to address gaps in learning and rubrics to assist in grading and self-assessing. Although materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice writing, standards-aligned explicit instruction is largely absent.
In Unit 1, there are seven lessons on narrative writing. The task is to rewrite pages from another character’s perspective connecting to The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. Students practice skills such as including dialogue, establishing setting, and providing descriptive and sensory details. The teacher does not model how to analyze the Mentor Text (6th Grade Unit 1) alongside the Narrative Writing: Short Story Rubric nor do materials provide explicit instruction opportunities on writing narratives. Another opportunity is present in the same unit when students write a short memoir about an event in their own lives to demonstrate mastery of narrative writing skills they practiced earlier in the unit.
In Unit 2, there are eight lessons on argumentative writing. In four lessons, students find evidence from The Giver by Lois Lowry to support their position of whether ignorance is bliss. The teacher states what occurs during an analytical essay, defines the words ignorance and bliss, and defines a proverb. They must use two vocabulary words from the lesson in their argument. In the other four lessons, students argue whether parents should limit their children’s screen time, using evidence from at least two articles. The teacher does not model how to analyze the Mentor Text (6th Grade Unit 2 Lessons 16–19) along with the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric nor do materials provide explicit instruction opportunities on writing argumentative pieces.
In Unit 3, there are three lessons on informative writing. Students report on a female artist’s impact on contemporary culture, and they create a digital presentation to share with peers. In Unit 5, students have an opportunity to write informatively in one lesson. In Lesson 22, students write an informative piece to educate their “classmates on a refugee crisis currently taking place somewhere in the world.” Students create a digital presentation, and the task asks students to “Provide information about the causes of the crisis.” The teacher reviews the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Paragraph Rubric with students but does not provide explicit instruction on writing literary analysis. Lesson guidance directs the teacher to break down the components of RAFT and model the strategy when students work on their contemporary female artist research, but there is no explanation of the RAFT strategy or how to model its use included in the lesson.
Instructional materials include models and include sufficient, specific, and well-designed guidance, protocols, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Target Task Writing Support (6–12), various instructional strategies are available to support students during the prewriting, drafting, and post-writing stages. In the prewriting stage, teacher guidance includes breaking down the prompt, providing sentence stems, and encouraging rereading. During writing time, the guidance includes giving batch feedback, chunking independent time, and holding teacher conferences. The after-writing guidance includes having students reflect on their writing, using a rubric, and using a Show Call and Discourse routine. Also, in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction section, teachers can download an Editing Checklist (6–8.)
In the Teacher Tools, teachers are provided with five sections to use during instruction: Preparing for A Writing Lesson, Writing Structures and Frameworks, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8), Giving Writing Feedback, and Target Task Writing Support (6–12). These sections provide various guidance to support writing instruction, such as rubrics, sample feedback, and structures for using mentor texts.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 16, students complete a graphic organizer to help organize ideas for their argumentative essay. Students draw on evidence from the text The Giver by Lois Lowry around the following Writing Prompt: “Is ignorance bliss?” In Lesson 17, the objective states that students should “craft strong thesis statements and effective body paragraphs.” The Additional Support available in the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes the following guidance on completing the graphic organizer: “You may wish to select specific sections of text for students to focus on. Chapters 15–17 provide ample evidence for answering this question.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 19, students work on a collaborative research project about contemporary female artists, their work, and their impacts. The objective asks students to brainstorm, which they do in groups, after having chosen a single work of art by their chosen artist. Students collaborate to generate a list of questions using the Question Formulation Technique while considering the visual image. They follow the strategy’s four rules for producing questions: “1) Ask as many questions as you can; 2) Do not stop to discuss, judge, or answer any questions; 3)Write down every question exactly as stated; 4) Change any statement into a question.” The teacher then guides students through categorizing their questions as open or closed, followed by prioritizing them. Groups use these questions to guide the group projects.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 12, after reading Refugee by Alan Gratz, students answer the Writing Prompt about whether times of crisis bring out the best or worst in people. As students collect evidence, teachers can refer to the Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons 6-8 document in the Teacher Tools section; the Enhanced Lesson Plan, includes additional prompting to support students in gathering evidence in the Additional Supports section: “Sometimes students will find evidence that is disconnected from their topic sentences. Check to make sure that the evidence they choose strongly supports the inference outlined in the topic sentence. Either choose new evidence, or adjust the topic sentence so that it directly relates to the evidence chosen.”
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
Materials include research projects to build knowledge; however, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding, nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. While the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom, the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking. Research projects are present in some units, but there is no explicit instruction around the research writing standards. Research projects follow a topic closely related to the overall unit theme but do not draw on texts in each unit in conjunction with outside sources. Throughout the year, students are provided some guidance in doing research that sets a foundation for the research they will be conducting in Grade 7 and Grade 8. They are provided with opportunities to gather information from print and digital sources. The Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) explains the different structures and routines included in the writing lessons; one structure includes Researching/Gathering Evidence.
Research projects are not sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Teacher Tools include a general suggestion in the Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) for students to cite research, sharing Citation Machine as a possible online citation builder. There are also suggestions for presenting examples and non-examples of credible sources to students.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 26, students read multiple informational texts from different sources on screen time for children. Using evidence from the sources, students write an argumentative letter that answers the question: “Should parents limit their children’s screen time?” While the supporting standard, “Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources” appears in this lesson, it is not a focus in other units.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lessons 19–22, students choose a contemporary female artist from a list, and with a small group, conduct research to educate their peers in a presentation: “Provides a biography on the artist, including any obstacles faced by the artist and a photograph of the artist; Describes the artist’s style; Describes at least three of the artist’s major works of art, with images; Reveals what is/was important to the artist; Reports on the artist’s impact on contemporary culture.” They include researched facts and background information. In Lesson 20, they evaluate their research on their artist. The sample response shows the use of MLA citations. There are no instructions about assessing credibility of sources or how to paraphrase. The Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) in the Teacher Tools section of the materials includes general suggestions for teaching research, such as presenting examples and non-examples of credible sources and how to cite research, sharing Citation Machine as a possible online citation builder.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 20, the objective states, “Begin to gather information for their presentations from provided resources and those they have found online, differentiating between credible and non-credible sources.” There is no mention of credible or non-credible sources in the materials. In Lessons 20–23, students “create a digital presentation that educates your classmates on a refugee crisis currently taking place somewhere in the world.” Students include “accurate facts, statistics, and quotations from at least three reputable sources” as well as “Include a bibliography that cites all sources.”
Materials sometimes support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, general guidance to Research/Gathering Evidence is provided: “There are many ways to approach research tasks depending on the main objective of the writing project. If the focus is on selecting, analyzing, and disseminating information, it can be helpful to provide students with the research to use. This process can be scaffolded, depending on student need and development, from using all instructor-selected research, to using provided research as a starting point, or to guiding students in the practice of finding their own research.” Other suggestions include annotating, using a graphic organizer to keep track of information, offering a mini-lesson on paraphrasing, and supporting students in learning how to collaborate, evaluate sources, and cite research. The lessons lack sufficient explicit instruction of research skills to ensure student mastery of grade-level standards.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lessons 25, students conduct research using six provided articles to meet the Objective: “Create a poster of pros and cons of parents limiting kids’ screen time and appropriately cite evidence.” A Sample Response is provided. Teachers build background by saying, “Create a pros/cons chart, listing at least three reasons on each side of the argument, providing evidence from the texts to support each reason, and citing the author next to each of your quotes. Then, create a bibliography page to cite your sources using MLA format. Today’s work will prepare you for writing your opinion essays, so be sure to find the strongest evidence!” The Additional Supports section in the lesson states: “Reduce the number of articles students are working with. If necessary, choose which articles students should work with ahead of time. Provide groups with at least one positive and negative aspect and ask them to find evidence to support those points.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 20, the Objective states: “Working in small groups, compile and evaluate research for a digital presentation about an artist.” Students choose from a list of artists and create a visual aid with details about the artist, including a biography, description of the artist's style, importance, and impact. The project relates to the overall theme of the unit, gender discrimination in the art world. The list of artists is provided, but no resources. The Sample Response shows an image of a slide on style and the Works Cited for images used on the slide. In the Opportunities for Enrichment section, a link is provided to the Purdue Online Writing Lab website for students who may want to know more about MLA In-Text Citations. No further instructions or resources are provided.
Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 25, students read multiple texts, including five articles and a video, to find the “benefits and downsides” of limiting screen time, providing at least three reasons for each side. “Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate” is a core standard. They are expected to use MLA format to cite sources. In Lesson 26, students use the research from Lesson 25 to “write an essay in which you argue your position” on parents limiting their children’s screen time and use evidence from at least two articles to support their stance.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 20, students continue working on a research project about a current refugee crisis. Students can research using many sources but choose the topic from a provided list, not a line of inquiry.
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 16, students write an essay to answer: “Is ignorance bliss?” Students must use evidence from The Giver by Lois Lowry to support their position. In Lesson 25, materials address the skill as a core standard when students create a poster of pros and cons when parents limit kids’ screen time. The lesson objective states that students appropriately cite evidence. Students draw on evidence from five informational articles. The Writing Prompt states: “Create a poster of a pros/cons chart, listing at least three reasons on each side of the argument, providing evidence from the texts to support each lesson. Cite your sources using MLA format.” The writing project takes place over five lessons. Materials address this skill as a supporting standard in all the other units in the grade.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
The grade 6 materials include instruction, tasks, and assessment questions in which the majority are aligned with grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once. While the materials generally adequately address reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards, the instructional support of the language standards, in particular, is lacking.
Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 6th Grade English, to plan for the whole school year. The implementation schedule provided in the materials may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.
Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials outline how the year-long instructional plan aligns with grade-level Core Standards and Spiral Standards as indicated in the Standards Map and in each Unit Overview. At times, standards addressed in lessons are not listed on the Lesson Map; there are also instances where standards are included at the bottom of a lesson but there is no explicit instruction or connections to the standards present in the lesson. The instructional sequence is relatively consistent as students read core and supplemental texts connecting to a common topic or theme, answer Close Read Questions and Discussion Questions, and complete a Writing Prompt connecting to the assigned reading. Lessons include opportunities for the teacher to provide students with standards-aligned explicit instruction. The questions and tasks connect to the required grade level standards, including Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Language Standards, and they require students to include evidence from texts they are reading as they work on skills such as inferencing or analyzing certain aspects of texts. Opportunities to address language standards are present, though instructional support is lacking. Materials provide an answer key for each Content Assessment, which lists the standards addressed by each assessment item. There is a Standards Map and lesson plans reflect standards covered.
Over the course of each unit, instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Course Summary includes a detailed description of what will be studied, including a rationale for the anchor texts, the enduring understanding focused on throughout the year and a Standards Map that outlines which standards are addressed in each unit. For example:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 22, the lesson objective is as follows: “Explain how specific sections of an article fit into the overall structure of the text and help to develop meaning.” This objective aligns to RI.6.5, the core standard listed for the lesson. The teacher reminds students that “structure refers to the way a text is ‘built’ or organized” and also notes, “Every part of the text serves a specific purpose, and in an argumentative text (like this opinion piece), the ultimate purpose of every section is to support the central idea.” Students answer a Writing Prompt where they explain how the final sentence of the article “Kids Must Learn to Control Their Own Screen Time” by John Kielman helps to develop the main idea of the article. Later in the lesson, Close Read Questions address other pieces of the article and what purpose they serve in developing ideas further.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, different types of tasks align to standards. Close Read Questions require students to analyze complex text and respond to standards-aligned, text-based questions. Discussion Questions connect to the texts. Many questions and tasks, including the Writing Prompts, require students to use text-based evidence, which requires inferencing. For example:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 2, students finish reading Chapter 1 of The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis. While reading the chapter, students respond to the following Close Read Questions: “Re-read pages 8–13. How does author Christopher Paul Curtis develop the reader’s understanding that the book’s narrator is a young person? Provide specific pieces of evidence from the text and then explain how each piece of evidence shows this.” and “Christopher Paul Curtis uses hyperbole in the following line from page 18: ‘I bet Byron’s lips stretched a mile before they finally let go of that mirror.’ How does this use of figurative language help the reader understand Kenny as a character and narrator?”After reading the chapter, students write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “How does Kenny see his older brother, Byron? How does Christopher Paul Curtis develop Kenny’s point of view of his brother through dialogue, thoughts, and/or actions? Support your answer with two specific pieces of evidence from the text.” Then, students participate in a class discussion of their responses to the following Discussion Question: “How would this text be different if it were told from an adult’s perspective? Would you be as interested or engaged in the book if it were written from that perspective? Explain your thinking.” Exit Ticket questions include, “How do Kenny’s thoughts and dialogue on page 13 reveal his perspective of the situation with Byron? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text to support your answer.” These questions and tasks align to the core standard listed for the lesson, RL.6.6: “Explain how an author develops the point of view of the narrator or speaker in a text.”
Over the course of each unit, assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In each unit, materials provide an Assessment Answer Key for the end-of-unit Content Assessment. The Assessment Answer Key labels each question with the corresponding standard. For example:
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Content Assessment Answer Key, the Essay section lists RL.6.1, RL.6.2, RL.6.3, RL.6.5, RL.6.6, RL.6.9, RL.6.10, W.6.1, W.6.4, W.6.9, W.6.10, L.6.1. L.6.2 as standards addressed during the following assessment item: “‘First impressions are always unreliable—Franz Kafka’ In a four-paragraph essay, explain whether you think that the narrator of ‘The War of the Wall’ would agree with this quote. Write a strong introduction and conclusion and provide sufficient evidence from the text to support your answer.” While students cite textual evidence to support their analysis of the quote (RL.6.1, RL.6.5) during this assessment item, students do not determine theme or central idea (RL.6.2), describe how the plot unfolds or how characters respond or change relative to the plot (RL.6.3), explain how the author develops the narrator’s or speaker’s point of view (RL.6.6), or compare and contrast texts in different form (RL.6.9). Students demonstrate standards W.6.4, L.6.1 and L.6.2 through the formality and writing conventions in their answer.
By the end of the academic year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Standards Map notes that each unit is designed to deepen “student mastery of a set of grade-level standards. These are split into core standards (standards especially important for understanding the core text and knowledge of the unit) and spiral standards (standards that students repeatedly use as they engage with, discuss, or write about a text).” However, there are instances in which standards are addressed one time across the school year. For example:
In Unit 4, Finding Connections: The Outsiders, RL.6.7 is listed as a core standard. Materials address this standard in Lessons 5 and 15, but materials do not provide opportunities to address this standard in other units.”
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.
Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 6th Grade English to plan for the whole school year. Each unit contains a separate implementation schedule and each lesson includes a pacing guide. The Standards Map shows how the Common Core State Standards are taught over the course of the year. The pacing guide allows teachers to add days to the units to cover the material appropriately for their students; however, no alternative schedules are provided. Additional guidance for planning is included in the Teacher Support tools, such as Preparing to Teach Fishtank ELA, Preparing to Teach an ELA Unit, Components of an ELA Lesson, and Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA. The implementation schedule may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days giving teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others. Materials do not include optional tasks, only core materials and activities. The core materials provide opportunities to practice and reach mastery of most grade level standards, though grammar standards would need additional guidance.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Support, ELA Teacher Tools, Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA, materials provide an implementation schedule with suggestions for teachers to address re-teaching and fit other assessments or school events into the lesson progression.
Materials include five units with a total of 132 lessons over 138 instructional days. The Pacing Guide for 6th Grade English states, “Each unit includes a specific number of lessons, including writing lessons, Socratic Seminar lessons, and two days for assessment.” There are no alternative implementation schedules, though the program provides time for teachers to create assessments and make instructional decisions to support students. The Grade 6 Focus Area Overview provides details relating to each unit’s core standards and spiral standards. For example, in Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 23, Notes are available: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”
Suggested implementation schedules may be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Pacing Guide for 6th Grade English, the implementation schedule states, “Our 6th Grade English units span 138 days. We intentionally did not account for all 180 school days to allow teachers to fit in additional review or extension, teacher-created assessments, and school-based events.” There is no alternative implementation schedule present. Similarly, each unit contains a separate implementation schedule. For example, In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, there are 28 lessons with a suggested implementation time of 29 days. Two additional days are suggested for the Content Assessment.
In each unit, each lesson includes multiple Close Read Questions, a Target Task Writing Prompt, and often Discussion Questions. Each lesson includes a pacing guide for teachers that presents how long they should spend on each of these tasks within the class period. Homework is listed for almost every day of the unit that students complete to stay on schedule with the pacing guide, typically reading, sometimes writing. In lessons with Socratic Seminars, the task can be completed in one class period.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 5, students answer four Close Read Questions, one Discussion Question, and a Writing Prompt: “Summarize the events of chapter 8. Where does this chapter fall in the overall structure of the text? Carefully explain your thinking, and use the vocabulary word ‘tension’ in your response.” In the Homework section, students are assigned Chapters 9–10 of the novel.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 20, students participate in a Socratic Seminar. Teachers may choose the discussion question(s) for the day to help with the timing. Since the focus of these lessons is speaking and listening standards, students will receive practice with the standards regardless of the questions chosen by the teacher.
Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No optional tasks are included.
Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No optional tasks are included.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The grade 6 materials do not meet expectations for usability. Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research.
The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level in both regular content and assessments. There are various types of assessments in the program, including unit content assessments, formative and summative assessments. While an answer key is provided for all assessments, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key. The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.
Materials include general support throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students. Still, the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson, as the variation of the structure in lessons is limited.
The program does not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The grade 6 materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research.
The materials also include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson for teacher use. Materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.
The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, there is no letter template provided.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
The materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. In each unit, links in the Enhanced Lesson Plan allow teachers to download student materials for use in the lessons. These materials include a vocabulary package and the option to turn the Key Questions, Target Task, and Exit Ticket into student handouts. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes specific suggestions for how to incorporate materials within the lesson plan, including explanations for use, directions for how to frame and utilize supports, reminders, sentence stems, and key places to stop in texts for all sections of the lesson. These key stopping points include the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary, the Close Read, the Target Task, and the Class Discussion sections. Each lesson contains one or more Objectives for students to meet and a list of core and supporting Common Core Standards covered in the lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Unit Summary with explanations of how the anchor text was selected and how the supplemental texts support the anchor text and themes in the unit. Each module includes a Unit Launch to help the teacher understand the unit. The Unit Launch includes five steps: Introduction, Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Key Writing Standards.
Lessons offer guidance for teachers to support all students by Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and guidance is available consistently around the Target Tasks across the grade level. An example of additional support is when the materials offer sentence stems and scaffolding questions for teachers to utilize when following the close-read procedures.
Each non-writing lesson includes a comprehension and vocabulary review at the onset of the lesson. This section includes specific teacher guidance on how to introduce vocabulary words, including the use of word walls, vocabulary logs, and vocabulary cards. Students review key vocabulary from the previous lesson. Materials provide links to specific strategies to teach vocabulary words. Materials also differentiate words into content-specific academic categories and provide guidance explaining the difference to students and the teaching of each. The Unit Summary includes a comprehensive list of the vocabulary for the unit, including part of speech and definition.
In the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, the goal is to “build [teachers] understanding of how students might experience the unit text(s) based on these interconnected aspects of text complexity.” For example, Unit 2 includes the following subsections with descriptions, examples specific to the unit, and reflection questions for the teacher:
What Makes the Text Complex
Understanding the Supplemental Texts
Your Students and These Texts
Reflections on the Author
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 1, the materials offer guidance for Supporting All Students in the form of a Close Read Procedure and include specific Key Moments to Analyze, connecting to the text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963: “One of those days that when you breathed out your breath kind of hung frozen in the air like a hunk of smoke and you could walk along and look exactly like a train blowing out big, fat, white puffs, of smoke (p. 1).” There are scaffolding questions available to support students in providing specific evidence from the text to explain how the use of figurative language establishes the setting, such as “What examples of imagery do you notice on the page?”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 1, the Key Understandings section includes Skills, Strategies, and Knowledge that students will gain in the lesson. In each section of the lesson, the teacher is provided with directions on how to present the content. Examples include: “Explain that today, students will be focusing on the prologue of Copeland’s memoir, specifically on the way that sections of text fit into the overall structure of the memoir and contribute to the development of ideas. Remind students that every choice an author makes is deliberate. This is true from the individual words they choose to the way sentences are structured, the literary devices that are used, to the inclusion of specific paragraphs, sections of text, and chapters. When reading a text, it is important to think critically about why the author has made specific structural choices and the impact these choices make on creating meaning in the text.”
In Unit 4, the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary section includes the following questions: “Would you describe Jonas as conscientious? Why or why not?” This question includes a notation that students learned the word conscientious in Unit 1 and follow-up questions to help clear up any misconceptions of the meaning of the word.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 18, the Key Understandings section includes Skills, Strategies, and Knowledge that students will gain in the lesson. In each section of the lesson, materials provide teachers with directions on how to present the content. Examples include: “Have students answer today's Close Read Questions. Students should read each question, then reread the page(s) referenced in the question before writing their answer. Depending on student needs, students can answer the questions orally, annotate in the margins, or write their answers. While students are reading, circulate to gauge student understanding of the questions. Provide additional support when needed.” The Close Read section of the Enhanced Lesson Plan includes clear suggestions and directions for teachers to use as they approach the Close Read questions. For example, first, teachers “Remind students of the definitions of ‘theme’ and ‘thematic topic.’A small explanation is included. A close reading structure is also suggested. After students answer the first Close Read question (“What thematic topics does Gratz explore in this text?”), it is suggested that teachers ask students to share out ideas, develop a class list of topics, and then move on to the next question. ScaffoldingQuestions, Key Moments, and Language Supports in the form of sentence stems are included for additional support with the Close Read Questions.
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
The materials include limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. Each unit provides a Unit Prep section with Notes for Teachers that include some additional contextual background; however, it does not provide support in teaching grade-level concepts within the lesson plans. Explanations are included in the Teacher Tools of different aspects of the curriculum and teaching techniques or different strategies related to the knowledge demands of each unit. Still, they are not lesson- or text-specific. The explanations of the concepts are specific to the approaches taken by the materials and do not provide any additional opportunity for teachers to expand their understanding of a concept.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, multiple sections present specific information on how to prepare the unit, internalize a unit, and understand the different components of an ELA lesson.
In the Teacher Tools, Writing, there are specific full-length explanations of Learning to Write and Writing to Learn.
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, there are explanations of Intellectually Preparing a Unit, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Scaffolds for English Learners, Engineering Texts, Oral Language Protocols, and Using Graphic Organizers as Scaffolds.
In Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, there are explanations of Categories to Progress Monitor, and Types of Assessment for Progress Monitoring, including Formative Assessments and Summative Assessments.
In the Vocabulary section of the Teacher Tools, there is an explanation of how the vocabulary is built into the unit and an explanation of how students build vocabulary through interacting with Tier II and Tier III words. There is then an in-depth explanation of how to teach the words within the text. There are no specific examples or modeling provided. There is further instruction for teachers on how to teach vocabulary through both an implicit and explicit approach with guidelines and strategies but no specific examples or modeling.
In the Teacher Tools, Providing Access to Complex Texts section, there are detailed explanations of what makes a text complex and how to provide access and support for more complex texts being used by students.
In Teacher Tools, Routines for Active Reading, there is an explanation of what active reading is and then more in-depth explanations of various forms of active reading, including Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading, and Independent Reading.
In the Unit Launch section, materials provide the teacher with an opportunity to internalize the essential questions of the unit. The teacher has opportunities to explore the questions as well as sample answers to the questions. In the section “Considering Who and Where You Are,” the teacher has an opportunity to reflect on biases or gaps in knowledge that might impact the teaching of the unit.
Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4: Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson Overview, Unit Prep, the Notes for Teachers section explains that the book addresses a number of difficult and mature topics, including gang violence, murder, domestic violence, the death of parents, the death of friends, a police shooting/suicide by police, and PTSD/depression. Included with this note are the recommendations to “be mindful of your students’ backgrounds and life experiences and be aware that they may have strong reactions to the book.” There is also a note that the book is written by a female but does not have any strong female characters and that teachers may want to have students consider how gender is reflected in the text. No guidance is provided on how this could be done.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
For each unit, the Lesson Map table includes a list of addressed standards. At the beginning of each unit in the Unit Prep, there is also a section titled Common Core Standards, where the core and supporting standards are listed.
The end of each lesson in every unit includes a list of Common Core Standards and Supporting Standards, which are defined as “Standards that are practiced daily but are not priority standards for the unit.” All are hyperlinked to a pop-up window with the full text of the standard.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 1, materials list Common Core Standards L.6.6 and RI.6.2 for the lesson. Supporting standards listed include L.6.4, RI.6.10, SL.6.3, L.6.4.b, RI.6.4, SL.6.6, W.6.4, L.6.4.c, RI.6.7, W.6.10, W.6.9, L.6.4.d, SL.6.1, W.6.2, W.6.9.b, RI.6.1, SL.6.2, W.6.2.a.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Launch section of the curriculum includes an explanation for the key reading and writing standards is provided. The teacher works through unpacking the essential standards by answering questions concerning the standard and how it connects to the unit. Questions include: “Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)? What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?” Once the teacher enters a response, they are given the opportunity to view the publisher’s answer. The next step is to “Apply the Standard.” In this section, the teacher is provided with a set of tasks that are included in the unit and answers the question, “Reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.” In Step 3, “Define Mastery,” the teacher reflects on the skills that students must develop to answer the target tasks successfully. Each step in this internalization of the unit has publisher exemplar responses to help deepen understanding.
The Unit Launch for each unit includes a section entitled Unit Essential Content. Guidance notes, “The goal of this section is for you to review and fully understand the key content knowledge of a unit prior to teaching. Doing this work prior to teaching the unit will help you endure that students internalize the key content knowledge by the end of the unit.”
In the Unit Essential Content section, materials describe Key Reading Standards: “For each unit, we have identified the key reading standards of the unit. These key standards are among the most important in helping students understand this unit’s texts. These standards represent a subset of the reading standards covered in the unit and work in conjunction with the other standards noted at the unit level. For each standard, you will reflect on why the standard is particularly useful for making meaning of the unit’s core and supplemental texts. You will apply the standard to specific Target Tasks from this unit and analyze how the standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly complete the task. Finally, you will reflect on what students will ultimately need to know and be able to do to demonstrate mastery of this standard. This work will help you ensure that students are interacting with the texts and tasks at the right level of rigor and depth.” For each standard, teacher guidance includes the following prompts and materials provide a mastery response after submission:
Step 1: Unpack the Standard
Read and analyze the language of this key reading standard.
Considering the language of the standard above, answer the questions below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:
Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)?
What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?
Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale as to the importance of this standard and what students are likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard.
Step 2: Apply the Standard
Below are a set of tasks from this unit that require students to have a strong understanding of this key standard in order to answer each question correctly. Read each task, the appropriate section of the text, and our sample response. Then, reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.
After the task, a reflection question is provided.
Consider the question below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:
How does applying this key standard help students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task?
Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale on how this key standard helps students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task.
In the Unit Essential Content section, Key Writing Standards are described.“In this section, you will explore the key writing standards of this unit and what mastery of these standards looks like in the context of the unit. These standards represent a subset of writing standards covered in the unit and were selected because they are among the most important in helping students write in response to the text(s). First, you will closely read the language of the standards in tandem with the unit’s culminating writing task. Then, you will examine an exemplar response to the task and reflect on how the standards help students proficiently complete the writing task.”
Step 1: Unpack the standards
First, read and analyze the language of the key writing standards.
What are key understandings of these standards? What do they ask students to know and be able to do?
Step 2: Apply the Standards
Now, read this unit’s culminating writing task, followed by our example of an exemplar response. While reading the exemplar, notice and annotate for evidence of the standards.
Use the following questions to guide your annotations:
How does this exemplar show mastery of the standards?
What do students need to know and understand in order to complete the writing task?
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, there is no letter template provided. Materials provide limited information to guide teachers relating to the content covered in each unit or lesson. Materials do not include information on how parents or caregivers can help students succeed in the program.
Materials contain limited strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the Notes for Teachers section of the Unit overview advises: “Be aware that this unit discusses some difficult topics. Life in Mother includes descriptions of domestic violence, eating disorders, and the n-word. The lesson on Favianna Rodriquez briefly discusses abortion and reproductive rights. You may want to inform parents and school staff when these topics will be discussed.” Materials do not provide additional support to guide teachers in creating communication with parents and school staff.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program and include an annotated bibliography that references the research-based strategies. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. Materials provide a concise explanation of each ELA component and explain how the program is designed to teach the components to accomplish the stated goals. The Our Approach section emphasizes the flexibility of the program and its focus on being culturally relevant.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Our Approach section, the materials explain the approach taken in general terms, including a focus on texts over skills, criteria for content selection, the foci for writing instruction, and approaches to discussion and word knowledge.
The Teacher Tools provides an explanation of how the materials approach each ELA component:
In Writing, Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction, the explanation states: “Language and writing instruction are embedded within all Fishtank ELA units from K-12. Language instruction is a powerful tool to help students understand the decisions authors make and how they impact the effect their writing has on readers. Learning grammar and mechanics is about studying the intentional decisions authors make, noticing the power of different punctuation, sentence structures, and craft choices, and then trying out those strategies in their own writing. When learning different grammatical structures, students zoom in on sentences to notice the connection between mechanics, craft, style, and meaning. Language instruction isn’t separate from reading instruction because the connection between language and the author’s craft is integral. Because language instruction is so deeply connected to reading instruction, it should not be taught in isolation. And as far back as 1936, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) found that formal teaching of grammar and mechanics had little effect on students’ writing and even had deleterious effects on student writing when it displaced writing time. Instead, language instruction should be organically embedded into all aspects of reading and writing so that students can authentically grapple with and understand how different structures impact meaning.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, Interactive Read Aloud, the explanation states: “We use the word interactive because kids should be doing some of the heavy comprehension work during the reading aloud; the teacher shouldn’t be doing all the work.”
In Reading Structures and Routines, the explanation states that the goal of the curriculum is to build independent and strategic learners. The approach is explained as providing students with multiple opportunities to interact with a wide variety of texts independently, with the goal of having students read the core texts independently with little support.
In Vocabulary, the explanation states: “Vocabulary development is intentionally built within all Fishtank ELA units. Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic. Throughout the unit, students have multiple opportunities to engage with words orally or in writing. Depending on the word, vocabulary words are taught both directly or indirectly. Fishtank ELA does not rely on a single vocabulary instructional method; rather, instruction happens strategically within units so that students learn vocabulary indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines.”
In Writing, the explanation states: “Fishtank ELA includes opportunities for students to both learn to write and write to learn. Students will be immersed in reading, writing, discourse, and idea-generation cycles in each unit. There is no separate writing block and no separate writing curriculum; all writing instruction is embedded directly into lessons and units. Through embedded on-demand and process-writing assignments, students build powerful, evidence-based arguments and develop their voices in various genres. Because students need solid knowledge and understanding of a subject matter to write, all Fishtank ELA writing assignments are connected to a core text or ask students to write about content knowledge from the unit, ensuring that all students have equal access to the assignment.”
In the Fishtank guiding principles, materials provide the following information: “In Literature units from Kindergarten through 8th grade, students read texts that explore themes applicable to their lives while also building knowledge of historical events and time periods. Most of the literature units focus on developing identity, diversity, justice, and activism, which are key components of Learning for Justice’s Social Justice Standards. The content of all of our K–8 units, both Literature and Science & Social Studies, aim to provide students with windows and mirrors to ensure students see their own identities, experiences, and motivations in texts (mirrors) alongside texts that allow students to gain insight and build empathy for the identities, experiences, and motivations of others (windows) (Style, 1996). And, wherever possible, our units aim to engage students in discussions of current events. We also frequently update our units to incorporate articles and discussion topics that reflect current issues in the world around them.”
The Fishtank guiding principles also include the following reference: “Rather than organizing lessons around specific skills (e.g., how to find the main idea) and teaching these skills in isolation, we organize our curriculum around carefully-selected texts that will engage students and facilitate deep thinking and strategy development. The text, and the demands of the text, drive the focus of a particular unit or lesson. Text-dependent questions in each lesson are sequenced in order to build a deeper understanding of the key ideas and themes presented by the text. Units across the curriculum require students to read a combination of longer texts to build stamina and engage in discussions about the full text, as well as close readings of specific passages or excerpts. Text-dependent questions and close readings push students to pay close attention to the author’s craft and text structure, word choice, and challenging vocabulary and syntax (Coleman and Pimentel, 2012). All grade-level Common Core Standards are carefully woven into the units and lessons, introduced and reinforced through text-dependent questions and close reading moments, and work in service of deep understanding of the text.”
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Writing, bibliographic references to multiple sources used in the development of their program include:
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin
Writing for Understanding: Using Backwards design to help all students write effectively by J. Hawkins, E. Ginty, K. LeClaire Kurzman, D. Leddy, and J. Miller
The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades by Judith C. Hochman and Natalie Wexler
In Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, bibliographic references to multiple research sources in the development of their program include:
Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Prompting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students by Z. Hammond
Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov
Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by J. Zwiers and M. Crawford
Common Core Standards in Diverse Classrooms: Essential Practices for Developing Academic Language and Disciplinary Literacy by J. Zwiers, S. O’Hara, and R. Pritchard
In Teacher Tools, Text Selection, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
Revised Publishers’ Criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, Grades 3–12 by D. Coleman and S. Pimentel
“Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy,” by Gloria Ladson-Billings
Why Knowledge Matters by E.D. Hirsch, Jr.
Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework and Historically Responsive Literary, Gholdy Muhammad, and “Curriculum as Window and Mirror” by Emily Style
In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines: Close Reading, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:
Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading by K. Beers and R.E. Probst
Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading by D. Fischer and N. Frey
Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--and Life by C. Lehman and K. Roberts
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners: Scaffolds for English Learners, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include “Essential Actions: A Handbook for Implementing WIDA’s Framework for English Language Development Standards” by Margo Gottlieb.
In Teacher Tools, Vocabulary, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction by Isabel Beck and Common Core Appendix A.
In Teacher Tools, the explanations of the Match Fishtank approach to writing, vocabulary development, and language and grammar instruction are followed by “resources referenced in the development of” each section.
Additional reference sections include Qualitative Complexity of Fiction Texts, Providing Supports for Text Complexity, How Texts are Selected in the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Close Reading, and Foundational Skills.
The Foundational Skills section and its subsections entitled Teaching Reading Fluency and Assessing Reading Fluency, as well as the subsections of Academic Discourse entitled Types of Academic Discourse and Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Subsections of Supporting English Learners entitled Scaffolds for English Learners and Oral Language Protocols, and the subsection of Progress Monitoring and Assessment entitled Formative Assessments include embedded footnotes with references.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
The materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit plan contains a list of the texts being read throughout the unit with hyperlinks to the texts (either for reading or for purchase).
Each lesson folder contains all the handouts students will need for the lesson.
For example, for Unit 1, lesson 1, the lesson folder contains separate student handouts for the exit ticket, homework, key questions, and target task.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The grade 6 materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The program includes unit content assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short and long-constructed responses, text-based discussions, written reflections, and essays. Each unit also includes standards-based formative and summative assessments.
The materials provide an answer key for each assessment in the program with the corresponding assessed standards. While an answer key is provided, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. In addition, the materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standards and practices for the grade level. Each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards the assessment addresses.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains an assessment that addresses the content covered during the unit. The answer key document includes a table that contains an answer key and the standards that each assessment question addresses.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
The materials include limited opportunities to determine students’ learning and insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. Most support occurs through a series of protocols and questions that teachers can use to respond to student data.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and some guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains one formal assessment that covers the content of the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, the Progress Monitoring and Assessments section includes a data analysis protocol. Materials provide probing questions for teachers to use to assist in discussing the assessment. Categories covered in this protocol include the Teacher Preparation Unit, Teacher Preparation Lessons, and Lesson Execution.
In the Teacher Tools, the Summative Assessments section contains the Data Meeting Protocol Guide, which includes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a Data Meeting. The guide has two parts. Part 1 explains how to use data to identify strengths and growth areas; Part 2 explains how to use data to reflect and plan next steps.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and limited suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Formative Assessment section provides several frameworks that teachers can use to monitor and respond to various types of student work.
In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Summative Assessment section provides a data meeting protocol that teachers can follow to identify instructional next steps.
While the Teacher Tools in the program provide a framework for teachers to use, materials do not include clear, codified suggestions for certain student misunderstandings.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
The materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The materials include unit Content Assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short- and long-constructed responses, text-based discussion, written reflection, and essays. Each unit includes standards-based formative and summative assessments. Summative assessments include standards-based constructed responses aligned to culminating discussions, presentations, or on-demand writing. Each unit includes instruction and assessment opportunities aligned to anchor writing standards. Students write essays to inform or to express a claim, or they write narratives. When used as a summative assessment, students complete these on-demand writing tasks independently.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority, The Giver, the Content Assessment covers various standards in multiple tasks. Students read the short story “Examination Day” by Henry Slesar and answer: “How does paragraph 12 develop the plot of the story?” Students answer a second part of the question by locating a paragraph that develops the plot using the same technique. Another question asks students to identify the mood of the Jordan household on the morning of Dickie’s birthday and then identify the words and phrases from the text that are most helpful in developing the mood. In another question, students write a paragraph on whether the short story is dystopian. The response must include an assertion, evidence, and analysis to explain thinking.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, the Content Assessment covers various standards in multiple tasks. Students read “The War of the Wall” and answer multiple choice questions, such as identifying the narrator’s point of view at the beginning of the text and the corresponding evidence to support their answer. Students also read an article, identify the central idea, and identify specific pieces of evidence that support the central idea. In another question, students complete vocabulary questions such as determining which sentence uses the word incredulous correctly.
Examples of formative assessment types include:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 2, students answer the question: “How does Kenny see his older brother, Byron? How does Christopher Paul Curtis develop Kenny’s point of view of his brother through dialogue, thoughts, and/or actions? Support your answer with two specific pieces of evidence from the text.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 4, students answer the question: “How does Copeland illustrate and elaborate on the idea that her life ‘was spinning out of control’? What examples and anecdotes does she provide to the reader in Chapter three to develop this idea? Support your answer with quoted evidence from the text. Use the vocabulary words ‘chaotic’ or ‘turbulent’ in your answer.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 21, students conduct research to answer the prompt: “In this unit, we have learned about the Syrian refugee crisis, which continues today. Although Syrians currently comprise the largest population of displaced people in the world, there are millions of other people who have fled their homes and countries to escape war, gang violence, poverty, economic collapse, and food insecurity. In this project, you will work in small groups to create a digital presentation that educates your classmates on a refugee crisis currently taking place somewhere in the world.”
Examples of summative assessment types include:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 16, students write a narrative essay for the prompt: “Kenny Watson is the narrator of The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963. The reader sees the world of the novel through Kenny’s eyes, gaining access to his thoughts and feelings. What would it be like to read the same text but from the perspective of a different character? Your task is to rewrite pages 177–179 from Byron’s perspective“ (W.6.3, W.6.3.b, W.6.3.d, W.6.5).
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 23, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (L.6.1, L.6.2, L.6.3, L.6.6, RI.6.3, RI.6.5, RI.6.2, RI.6.1, W.6.4, W.6.2, W.6.7, W.6.8, W.6.9).
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 26, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (RL.6.4, RL.6.5, RL.6.2, RL.6.6, RL.6.1, W.6.3).
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. The assessments are not designed so students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. To make the tests more accessible, such as text-to-speech or increasing the font size, teachers must download and edit the assessments.
Materials do not offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Assessments are digital and housed on the website. Although assessments could be altered before printing, it would involve reformatting the answers.
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The grade 6 materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. While the materials include suggestions on how materials can be scaffolded for multi-lingual learners or for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, these suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of these scaffolds to the teacher. The materials do include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates.
Throughout the program, there is limited variation in structure. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students, but the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson.
The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. Materials include instances that provide opportunities for enrichment which “can be used with advanced students or students who have demonstrated readiness for enrichment as a way of exploring texts, topics, and more complex concepts in depth.” The Additional Supports section should assist students when working with grade-level content to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy; however, teachers will need to determine which supports to utilize specifically for special populations.
Materials provide limited strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Summary consistently provides a general statement: “In order to ensure that all students are able to access the texts and tasks in this unit, it is incredibly important to intellectually prepare to teach the unit prior to launching the unit. Use the intellectual preparation protocol and the Unit Launch to determine which support students will need. To learn more, visit the Supporting all Students teacher tool.”
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, the materials provide a Supporting All Students section that includes a question mark icon that populates the following guidance when clicked: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task. See Supporting All Students with Fishtank ELA for more guidance.” An example of general support includes Sentence Stems to assist with the task of summarizing the text The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis: “Some believe that the reason that first-born children may be more successful than younger siblings is that ____________.” The supports do not provide additional guidance for teachers to make decisions.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 14, the Objective states that students will determine “overall themes for the novel The Giver and explain how the author develops those themes.” Students complete a Close Read during the lesson, and the Supporting All Students section provides supports for questions. For example, students answer, “Where in the text does Lowry explore the thematic topic of resistance? Name at least two places.” The Lesson Plan gives Key Understandings, Scaffolding Questions, and Key Moments to Analyze as options for support. However, these supports do not clearly specify which populations of students they should be used for. The Additional Supports section includes a question mark that, when hovered over, provides a pop-up: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Supporting All Students, the Building Background and Engagement section includes a specific recommendation for teachers to create an anchor chart for students to use in the lesson. Students can reference the chart if they need assistance understanding vocabulary words while working independently. In other units, a few lessons include the Supporting All Students sections in the vocabulary part of the lesson. The hover menu states that these can be used to help multilingual learners and students with learning differences to access the language demands of the text but does not specify how to use them. This is a generic statement that is present for all language supports provided in the lessons.
The Supporting All Students teacher tool provides general support scaffolds for supporting English language learners; however, these scaffolds are broad and not specific to any lesson or text.
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. The number of lessons that contain an “Opportunities for Enrichment” section is limited. Some of the lessons provide specific scaffolds intended to enhance lessons by providing additional depth through many activities for students, such as reading an extra text or portion of a text or completing an additional assignment for the text.
Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:
In Lesson 5, enrichment opportunities include: “What is the difference between the words “assigned” and “selected” (pages 74–75)? How are the meanings and connotations of these words similar and different? What are the connotations of the word ‘anguish’ (page 75)? In what way has the Chief Elder caused Jonas anguish? Support your answer with specific examples from the text. On pages 78–79, the Chief Elder lists the characteristics that a Receiver must have. What are the similarities and differences between having ‘intelligence’ and having ‘wisdom’?”
In Lesson 7, enrichment opportunities include: “Have students watch these videos on explaining color to people who are blind: ‘Describing Colors As A Blind Person’ by The Tommy Edison Experience (YouTube), ‘Kids Describe Color to a Blind Person by Cut (YouTube). Or, have students watch this video of someone who is colorblind, seeing the full range of colors for the first time. ‘Giving my colorblind Papa EnChroma glasses’ by Carson Stafford (YouTube). After watching the videos, have students compare Jonas’s response to the response of the people in the video. What is similar? What is different? Why?”
In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include: “Continue the conversation by connecting some ideas from the past to our present moment. What do you think the past should have (or has) taught us that we can learn from to make our present better? Encourage students to look through the newspaper at home and bring back examples to discuss tomorrow.”
In Lesson 13, enrichment opportunities include: “If students are eager to learn more, the series continues! Tell them about the other three books in the quartet (Gathering Blue, Messenger, and Son). If they’re interested, encourage them to start a book club outside of class to answer the question ‘what happens at the end of the book?’”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:
In Lesson 2, enrichment opportunities include: “For additional practice with language usage, students can create a dictionary of contemporary slang or research meme culture and how it impacts vernacular English. Students can also research AAVE, LGBT slang, and drag slang and the complication of cultural appropriation and corporate marketing.”
In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include: “The scene at the church is told through Ponyboy’s perspective. Ask students how it might have been described differently had it been narrated by a different character (Dally, Johnny, Jerry Wood).”
In Lesson 17, enrichment opportunities include: “In pairs, have students act out the poem, pairing words with movements or gestures.”
In Unit 5, Fleeing conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, 15 of 26 lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials provide some variety in how students demonstrate understanding. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. The non-writing day Enhanced Lesson Plans follow the same format for each lesson. Students regularly respond in the same ways. Each lesson begins with a Close Read, during which students read the assigned text and answer Close Reading Questions. Students answer questions orally by annotating the text, writing in the margins, or writing their answers. The Target Task Writing Prompt that follows requires students to write an answer using textual evidence to support ideas. The teacher provides feedback for a few examples, and students revise their work based on the feedback. Students participate in a class discussion focused on a given question. Students have one minute to jot down ideas, and two minutes to discuss in pairs or groups, before participating in a class discussion. Students complete an exit ticket to close the lesson. The repetitive nature of the lesson plan creates a system in which students repeatedly respond in the same manner to prompts.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a limited variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 10, students engage in a turn-and-talk discussion: “How does seeing this part of the documentary add to your understanding of what an important accomplishment it was for Misty to be cast in this role?”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 16, when Building Background and Engagement, the teacher explains, “One of the most important things we do as readers is self-monitor our own comprehension. This is especially true as we encounter unfamiliar words and determine whether these words are essential to our comprehension of the text. Once we have determined that an unfamiliar word is essential to understanding the text, then we must use tools to determine meaning.”
Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watson’s Go to Birmingham--1963, Lesson 3, students express their thinking when they answer a discussion question, “Why do some students bully others? What can we learn about bullying from today’s reading?”
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham--1963, Lesson 4, during a class discussion, students answer, “Did your feelings toward Larry Dunn change over the course of today’s reading? Do you think he got what he deserved? Why or why not? Have your feelings toward Byron changed since the beginning of the text?” In the Opportunities for Enrichment section, students explain whether they would consider Byron to be a complex dynamic character and provide evidence to support their reasoning. Teacher notes include: “Students will notice that much of the thinking they have to do today is similar to the thinking they did yesterday.”
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 7, students answer the discussion question, “What is your reaction to the idea of Climate Control and ‘sameness’? Do you see any benefits of these systems? What are the downsides?”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 2, during the Close Reading portion of the lesson, students share why Misty Copeland includes a description of reading aloud in class when she was in the 6th grade in her book.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 5, students consider the following questions after viewing the movie The Outsiders 00:00:00-28:49, ”How did the music and lighting of the scene impact your experience of watching? Did the most ‘vivid’ images you noted down compared to what you saw on the screen? What does the view get to ‘see’ in the film version of this scene that is not described in the text?”
Materials leverage the use of included formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 18, students begin writing a multi-paragraph essay to respond to the writing prompt “Is ignorance bliss?” Students access a mentor text, and teachers ask a series of questions, such as, “What is the primary purpose of this sentence? ‘The characters in Lois Lowry’s dystopian novel, The Giver, live in a world like this.’ The purpose is to introduce the text (It’s also essential to explicitly state the title and author of the book you will be writing about!).” In Lesson 25, students create a poster of the benefits and downsides of parents limiting children’s screen time using evidence from texts. Students create a bibliography of sources used.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 4, as homework, students highlight or note the three lines from the text that are the most vivid. In Lesson 15, students respond to the prompt, “Return to the fight scene on pages 141-145 and review your notes from last night’s homework. Watch the scene in the film: 1:12:22-1:17:23. Compare and contrast the experience of reading about the fight in the park and watching it on film; what was different about the scene from what you had imagined when you were reading the book? Provide specific examples.” In Lesson 20, to prepare for the writing task, students discuss the question, “Consider everything we have discussed and learned from The Outsiders. Discuss with a partner: How does this proverb apply to the greasers and the Socs?”
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a self-assessment document, peer feedback document, and whole-class reflection document for students to use to score their own performance after discussions. The document is linked throughout the materials when formal discussions take place in the Enhanced Lesson Plan.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 14, students work in partners to conduct a close study of Ruth Asawa’s art. Teacher guidance includes, “Give students five minutes to ‘read’ their work of art and talk with their partner about what they see. Use the graphic organizer provided to spark conversation.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 19, after participating in a Socratic Seminar, students answer, “Self-reflect at the conclusion of the lesson (or after each question).” The teacher provides students with a reflection template that best fits the goals of the discussion. Materials provide the following documents: Self Reflection, Peer Feedback, and Whole-class Reflection.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 7, teachers “provide whole group, small group, or individual feedback and support to students” as they complete the writing task.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watson’s Go to Birmingham--1963, Lesson 24, students are provided the scoring rubric for the Socratic Seminar. Students reevaluate their materials and preparation in accordance with the rubric.
In Unit 2, Challenging Authority: The Giver, Lesson 17, Teacher Notes for writing state, “Students should spend the remainder of class writing body paragraphs. Remind students of the expectation that they use at least two of our vocabulary words in their essays. They should look for opportunities to use these words as they write their body paragraphs. When they complete a body paragraph, ask students to annotate each for their assertion, evidence, and analysis.”
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 18, students are provided the scoring rubric for the Socratic Seminar. Students reevaluate their materials and preparation in accordance with the rubric.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 23, after completing a draft, students review their own writing and remove any examples of informal writing, such as “examples of the first person (I believe, my evidence shows).”
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
While materials provide opportunities for grouping students, the groupings do not vary in type and groupings take place in the same part of each lesson. Students do not have multiple opportunities to work in varied groups or different types of groupings. Materials do not provide specific guidance that explains how teachers should form groups or how teachers should incorporate protocols when grouping students. Materials also miss opportunities to provide suggestions for additional times when groupings could be used.
Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide limited types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, Lesson 5, activity instructions require “students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets to share their thoughts” for two minutes before engaging in a whole class discussion.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the Teacher Notes state, “In partners, assign each pair of students a piece of Ruth Asawa’s art for close study: Sculptures and Works on Paper. Give students five minutes to ‘read’ their work of art and talk with their partner about what they see. Use the graphic organizer provided to spark conversation.”
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, Lesson 9, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 18, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion.
Materials provide limited guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, the Providing Support During Discourse section provides some guidance for the teacher “to ensure that all students are able to effectively participate in academic discourse, provide the whole-class, small-groups, or individual students with the following supports—Strategically group students. If your class has a large number of English learners, group students who speak the same home language together. Allow them to complete the assignment in either English or in their own home language.”
In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Preparing for Academic Discourse section poses this question for teachers to consider: “What vocabulary do students need to know and understand? Do I need to plan for Turn and Talks or small-group work to help students process the content?”
In the Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Types of Academic Discourse section includes information regarding the types of academic discourse provided in Fishtank ELA lessons: whole-class discussions, small-group discourse, and partner discourse. “The type of discourse students participate in will depend on the task and the goals of the lesson. There are many situations where all three types, or a combination of them, would be appropriate to use; however, each one brings some of its own unique values or benefits. When intellectually preparing to teach a lesson, you should think about where in the lesson you can include opportunities for different types of academic discourse.”
Materials provide protocols for Whole Class Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the Protocol for Fishbowl includes the following guidance: “The inner circle discusses a question while the outer circle observes. Note: This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task—often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback. Otherwise, it can be challenging to keep students in the outer circle engaged. Rotate so that each group of students engages in discussion and observation.”
Materials provide protocols for Small Group Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the protocol for Numbered Heads Together includes the following guidance: “Numbered Heads Together holds all members of a group accountable for participating and clarifying understanding of a particular question or topic. Numbered Heads Together can be used with any discussion prompt, however, questions with multiple answers or nuanced answers lead to a more engaging discussion.”
Materials provide protocols for Partner Conversation and “provide all students with a scaffolded and structured opportunity to formulate and share ideas. Partner conversations are low-risk and allow all students a chance to participate in the lesson at the same time.”
While materials provide this guidance in Teacher Support, the lesson plans do not adequately reference this guidance.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The materials provide some language supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English; however, materials miss opportunities to label specific protocols for these learners. The included language supports provide support with meaning, context, and understanding. These supports are also helpful to students who speak, write, and/or speak languages other than English with accessing the text or responding to the text. Materials provide additional supports in Teacher Tools that provide general guidance in preparing lessons for multilinguallearners; however, they are not lesson specific, are broad in application, and would require teachers to prepare materials for specific lessons within the curriculum.
Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Supporting All Students, the materials provide a question mark next to Language Support, which indicates the following: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text and the task. See the Supporting English Learners Teacher Tool for additional guidance.”
In Unit 1, Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham--1963, materials do not provide specific supports for multilingual learners.
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, materials include three lessons that specifically provide supports for multilingual learners. In Lesson 13, a scaffold states the closed captions on the video are accurate and should be turned on while viewing the video to help facilitate comprehension for students.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, materials include one lesson that specifically provides support for multilingual learners. In Lesson 25, Additional Supports includes a notation that figurative language may be especially difficult for multilingual learners. One suggested scaffold includes pairing students together to support students who may struggle with the concept.
In Teacher Tools, materials include multiple folders providing guidance for teaching multilingual learners. They include guidance on providing scaffolds that are divided into areas of light support and heavier support. Suggestions include providing illustrations, images, photos, providing videos, films, or audio to support a lesson, using real-life or physical objects, text clues, various graphic scaffolds, and interactive scaffolds, including pairing and working with the student’s home language, and increasing supplemental texts and noticing cognates. These are explained and provided as general guidelines and are not lesson specific.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide suggestions on preparing lessons with multilingual learners in mind, including unpacking the units and texts with a look to analyzing language demands, knowing the language and content goals of the unit, planning for assessment and mastery, and taking ownership of teaching the unit with multilingual learners in mind.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on Engineering the Text that provides guidance on how to physically alter a text to make it more accessible to multilingual learners, including adding questions, proving genre tips, defining vocabulary, explaining key background knowledge, adding illustrations and headings, and including stop and jot questions.
In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on using oral language supports with multilingual learners. These include the use of various groupings to assist with comprehension and expressing ideas.
In Teacher Tools, materials provide teachers with general scaffolds for multilingual learners. These include:
In the Sensory scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Light EL Support and Heavier EL support. For example, in illustrations, images, and photos light supports suggested are: “Add illustrations to literature texts that do not include illustrations. Illustrations could be used to break up long sections of text or to clarify tricky plot events.” Heavier supports include: “Strategically engineer the text to include illustrations that align with specific features of text complexity. Multiple illustrations could be added to make the text easier to digest. (For example, when reading the Brer Rabbit folktales about the well, include an illustration of a well.)
In Interactive Scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Pairs, Small Groups, Discussion, Cooperative Structures, and Home Language. For example, in Home Language, materials state: “For lighter EL support: Have students use translanguaging by using some words and phrases from their home language when discussing or writing about content. For heavier EL support: Have students have entire conversations in their home language or have students write answers in their home language. Provide additional instruction on a particular concept or idea in students’ home language. Provide students with texts and problems written in their home language. Have students write an answer in their home language. Then have students transfer their answers to English.”
In Additional Supports, materials provide the teacher with suggestions for “Supplemental Text” support and “Noticing Cognates.” In the “Noticing Cognates” support, materials provide the following: “For lighter EL support: Teach students strategies for identifying cognates and have students self-identify and interpret examples of cognates in texts and tasks. For heavier EL support: Before reading a text, find examples of cognates and have students break them down. Focus on the meaning and intonation of the words. Teach students Greek and Latin roots that are cognates in English and Spanish. Have students create cognate reference guides.”
In Oral Language Protocols, materials provide the teacher with protocols for the following: Turn and Talk, Think-Pair Share, Write-Pair Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share Revised, Partner A Partner B. An example of the “Think-Pair-Share Revised protocol states: “Students are given a chance to refine their thinking and ideas based on their partner’s ideas and discussion. The teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer. Students pair up. Students take turns sharing their answers. Students revise their original theories or ideas.”
In Engineering Texts, materials provide the teacher with a three-step guide to support planning. The explanation includes, “When you engineer a text, you add text supports to ensure all students have access. This does not mean changing the text or lowering the rigor of the task. An engineered text anticipates possible student misconceptions, gives vocabulary cues, provides additional background knowledge, scaffolds questions, and creates opportunities for discussion.”
In Graphic Organizer, for multilingual learner support, materials provide the teacher with “suggestions on how to adjust the organizers to provide light or heavy EL support.” Some examples include:
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide light EL support:
Provide blank templates for students to use when reading a text, brainstorming, or solving problems.
Adjusting graphic organizers to provide heavy EL support:
Provide students with partially filled-out graphic organizers.
Provide guidance on where in the text, resources, or problem students can find a particular answer. (For example, if students are looking to describe a character, provide specific paragraph numbers where students can find key evidence.)
Have students work in partners using an oral language protocol.
If applicable, allow students to complete the graphic organizer in their home language.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts. The publishers state in the overview that they “seek to create curricular materials that center students, reflect multiple perspectives and experiences, and empower students to think critically about the world they live in.” The texts hold true to that standard as they contain characters from a broad spectrum of society.
Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1: Developing Resilience: The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963, the core text, The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 by Christopher Paul Curtis, features an African American family who faces discrimination and segregation in the 1960s. Supplemental texts also prompt discussion on these issues. The characters represent a strong family unit that supports each other through challenges.
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, American writer Margaret Edwards is known for young-adult novels. The Outsiders addresses issues of social division due to socio-economic status, in this case, the rich social class or “Socs" and the poor “Greasers.”
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Finding Connection: The Outsiders, students read the poem “We Real Cool” by Gwendolyn Brooks, which is accessible and engaging for students and written by a black woman about her community.
In Unit 5: Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, students read multiple texts about various groups who have fled their homelands seeking safety. The Unwanted by Don Brown is a core text for the unit and depicts Syrian refugees and their challenges to survive.
Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3: Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, the focus is on professional female artists, including multiple women of color. The focus of the unit is on showing how the artists succeed in using their various art forms to communicate their ideas to the world. The core text, Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina by Misty Copeland, details the life of Misty Copeland and her successes in overcoming the challenges on her way to becoming a successful ballerina.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The Teacher Tools provide some suggestions that scaffolds can be provided for students in their home language and that student conversations can be held in their home language. These suggestions are very general and leave the implementation and development of the specific scaffolds to the teacher. Materials include suggestions that teachers should consider students’ backgrounds when preparing a lesson, but materials do not provide specifics on how this should be done. The lesson plans include some scaffolds for multilingual learners but do not specifically address ways to use the home language to support learners that are lesson-specific. The Teacher Support section includes general guidance for supporting multilingual learners that relates to leveraging students’ home language through the use of translanguaging strategies.
Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, materials include a suggestion that when possible, teachers should show video adaptations of text in either English or the student’s native language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, when discussing creating graphs and charts to aid students in comprehending the text, materials include a provision to create the aids in the student’s home language.
In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, Interactive Scaffolds, materials include provisions for incorporating the use of the student’s home language in discussions. Levels of support for students vary from translating phrases or words to allowing students to have complete conversations in their home language.
In Teacher Tools, the Planning for English Learners section provides teachers with a step-by-step guide of questions to intellectually prepare the unit. In Step One, the teacher unpacks the unit texts and tasks. Directions state, “Teachers should analyze the text, materials, vocabulary, unit focus areas, and lessons to determine the language demands of the unit. Questions include: What makes the text and tasks linguistically complex? What key vocabulary do students need to know and understand to engage with discipline-specific knowledge? What key language use(s) are targeted in the unit? How are students developing their understanding and production of all the key uses of language? (recount, explain, argue, discuss)” In Step Two, the teacher sets a vision for mastery. Directions state, “Teachers should articulate the language and content goals of the unit. What are the driving language demands of the unit? What language should you see and hear from students as they engage in meaning-making? Based on the language demands of the unit, what are the overall language goals for the unit? What are the content goals for the unit? What should students know and understand about reading, writing, and language? What should students know and understand about the themes/subjects of the unit?” In Step Three, teachers plan for assessment and mastery. In Step Four, teachers take ownership.
In Teacher Tools, English Learners, the Engineering Texts support provides teachers with a sample text. The example includes the following statements: “Let’s look at a before and after from a 5th-grade assignment from Science and Social Studies Unit 4: Exploring Mars, Lesson 19. In this lesson, students are reading a NASA press release for the first time. Here’s the original text, without text engineering, a press release from NASA: Mars Rovers Advance Understanding of the Red Planet As you can see, the text is complex for many reasons: Students may not be familiar with what a press release is, and the formal language used in a press release. Students may not have a strong grasp on knowledge from the unit so far, making it hard for them to understand key ideas from the press release. Students may not have a strong understanding of domain-specific vocabulary. Now, take a look at our Engineered Text Sample. This sample includes our meta-analysis of the purpose of each addition.”
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, the materials include general guidance to use translanguaging strategies. Students can annotate and take notes in their home language and research in their home language.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials include a support section in Teacher Tools that provides teachers with suggestions and methods for preparing lessons for multilingual learners. Materials provide multiple suggestions on how the lessons can be scaffolded for multilingual learners. These suggestions are general in nature and are not lesson-specific, leaving any scaffolding for lessons to be developed by the teacher. The Teacher Tool for Planning for English Learners provides further guidance that tells teachers to consider any connection between a lesson and students’ cultural backgrounds but the resource does not provide any specific guidance on how this should be done. Teachers must investigate and implement strategies on their own. Individual lessons include very limited scaffolding for multilingual learners, and none include connections to linguistics, culture, or conventions used in learning ELA. Suggested scaffolds include audio or visual representations of the text when available.
Materials make limited connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make limited connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Scaffolds for English Learners, the Additional Scaffolds section includes guidance on noticing cognates. Supports range from identifying and interpreting examples of cognates, teaching Greek and Latin roots, and creating cognate reference guides.
Materials include limited teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, during Step Four: Take Ownership of Planning for English Learners, guidance advises teachers to plan how they will consider students’ backgrounds when teaching a text. Suggestions include considering if connections can be made to students’ cultural traditions and considering what sociocultural context is relevant to the unit.
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two includes planning for how students’ backgrounds will connect to the lesson, including planning for any language demands that will need to be met.
Materials include limited equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two states, “Ensure accessibility: What supports will students with higher language proficiency need to access and understand the content? What scaffolds (sensory, graphic, or interactive) are needed?” The guidance also asks educators to consider medium and lower language proficiency needs.
Materials include limited opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages, such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, materials provide limited guidance on incorporating students’ holistic and cultural identities into the classroom, including learning about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds, inviting family or community members into the classroom, choosing materials that authentically represent students’ language and culture, and using intellectual preparation to plan for including students’ cultural identifies.
Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The grade 6 materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited.
Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
The materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Teachers can access “ready-made slides and handouts which [they] can edit, download, print, or send to Google Classroom.” Students complete two digital presentations across the units. Materials do not include specific provisions for students to use digital technology in research or composing writing assignments. Materials do not include interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards. The digital platform is intended for teacher use.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools, are not available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Digital tools minimally support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lessons 20–21, students create and present a collaborative digital presentation on a female artist.
In Unit 5, Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lessons 22–23, students create and present a collaborative digital presentation on refugees and where they are fleeing.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials include limited attention to digital technology. The materials do require students to write and collaborate on their editing, but there is no provision to do this digitally. Materials provide few opportunities for students to complete activities digitally. Students complete two digital presentations, limiting students’ opportunity to collaborate with their peers or teacher through digital technology. Materials do not provide specific guidance requiring students to collaborate digitally with peers or teachers on these projects. The presentations can be completed on a number of different platforms, including some that do not allow for digital collaboration.
Materials include limited references to digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3: Expressing Yourself: Women in the Arts, Lesson 20, students work in small groups to compile and evaluate research for a digital presentation. In the Introduction, the materials state: “Have groups select a collaborative digital presentation tool, like PowerPoint, Google Slides, Canva, Padlet, or Coggle.”
In Unit 5: Fleeing Conflict: Refugee & The Unwanted, Lesson 22, students create a digital presentation to educate classmates on a refugee crisis currently taking place somewhere in the world. In Building Background and Engagement, the materials include the following teacher instructions: “Have groups select a collaborative digital presentation tool, like PowerPoint, Google Slides, Padlet, or Coggle.”
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Student materials do not include images or graphics. The assessments and text-based student materials are easily read, and the structure is easily accessible to students. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter. Materials include PDF documents that are organized in an accessible way. Materials provide graphic organizers when needed to help students with organization. The use of typography, layout, and space is visually appealing, though there is little variance in color and no engaging images.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Student materials do not include images, graphics, or models.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The vocabulary pages and task pages that can be created for students are consistent and maintain the same layout. The information is easily identifiable and supports student understanding of the materials.
Throughout the curriculum, the teacher’s directions are consistent. Materials provide a PDF version of each lesson and a PDF of the Target Task and Exit Ticket.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Student materials do not include organizational features.
Each unit includes a lesson map. The layout is consistent across the curriculum.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials do not include embedded technology. Although teacher materials are digital, the use of technology is limited, and teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials do not provide specific lessons that incorporate teaching students how to use technology properly. Although materials include some general suggestions, such as instructing teachers that they should tell students to be certain that the resources they use are reliable, materials do not provide specifics on how to accomplish that task. Rather, teachers would have to develop guidelines and protocols for the use of technology independently.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found