2021

Fishtank Plus ELA 6-8

Publisher
Fishtank Learning
Subject
ELA
Grades
6-8
Report Release
04/21/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
60/72
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 7th Grade

Alignment Summary

The grade 7 Fishtank Plus ELA materials meet the expectations for alignment. The materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and relate to the essential questions of each unit. 

Throughout the program, students have the ability to engage in fruitful discussions and practice their writing skills. Students engage in all forms of writing, although the writing types do not reflect the distribution of text types expected by the standards. The materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammage usage standards but do include multiple opportunities for students to engage in guided vocabulary instruction. 

The grade 6 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “coming of age” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills.

The pacing guide and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

7th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

19/25
0
15
22
25
Usability (Gateway 3)
Partially Meets Expectations
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

The grade 7 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted and from multiple perspectives. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The questions and tasks included in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year and provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit.

In the program, students regularly engage in fruitful class discussions where they can practice their speaking and listening skills, as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students also engage in on-demand and process writing opportunities across text types, although the opportunities do not reflect the distribution of text types expected of the standards. Explicit evidence-based writing instruction guidance in the materials is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The materials do include guidance on vocabulary instruction, and students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

18/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

The grade 7 materials include anchor texts that are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works, with a 77/23 split. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material at the 7th-grade level. Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. There are a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria of Indicator 1a. 

Anchor texts are well-crafted, award-winning texts from multiple perspectives that are content-rich with ideas, events, and experiences. The anchor texts in each unit are engaging, easily relatable, and will stretch students’ thinking while covering a range of socially-conscious topics and what it means to be an American. Students read award-winning texts from multiple perspectives and have the opportunity to explore both literary and nonfiction texts of different genres.

Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, students read a variety of anchor texts, including “What Does it Mean to be American?” by Damien Cave and Todd Heisler; "Hello, My Name Is _____" by Jason Kim; “Who’s Irish” by Gish Jen; and “Call Me American” by Abdi Nor Iftin. The full collection of anchor texts includes articles, short stories, poems, and audio interviews. The anchor texts weave a picture of immigrant experiences and what it means to be American and how America is a country of immigrants. 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, the anchor texts are Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix. Both texts tell the story of the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, focusing on how it came to be, the immigrant stories of the victims, and how greed enabled the tragedy to happen by combining the historical documents in Marrin’s text and Peterson Haddix’s historical fiction story. 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students read the anchor text, A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, an award-winning playwright. The Broadway play explores the enduring ideas around racism, class, and the barriers that exist between many people and the American dream. The text is engaging and relevant for students.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, the anchor text, The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros, includes multiple vignettes about a Latino woman’s life with topics on gender roles, immigration, and harassment. The stories are engaging and include underlying messages, themes, and different forms of storytelling that are worthy of careful reading.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students read the anchor text, American Born Chinese, an award-winning graphic novel, by Gene Luen Yang. The text includes vivid imagery and complex language that will help students understand stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination, and the impact on identity from the perspective of a son of Chinese immigrants. 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, students read the anchor text: The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. The text follows the lives of two teenagers, Sasha (a white teen) and Richard (a black teen), using a combination of narrative techniques, including social media posts and flashbacks, which increases the challenge of the text. The main ideas of the text are related to the criminal justice system and the experiences of a non-binary character.

Indicator 1B
04/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b.

Materials include a variety of text types and genres across the year. The materials include a higher number of informational texts than literary works with a 77/23 split. However, instructional time spent with the literary works across the grade level is higher than informational texts. Text types include memoirs, articles, a speech, nonfiction books, interviews, comics, videos, graphic novels, drama, poems, short stories, historical fiction novels, and novels. The texts connect to a common topic or theme for each unit.

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, students read the article “What does it mean to be an American?” by Damien Cave and Todd Heisler, poems such as “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus, a short story “Who’s Irish?” by Gish Jen, explore a website “American Dreamers,” read a book excerpt “Call Me American” by Abdi Nor Iftin, listen to audio interviews “Philip and Andy” produced by Lyna Anwar with Andrés Caballero, and watch a video “DACA, explained” on Vox’s YouTube channel. Multiple informational texts from Newsela are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: “Immigration Act of 1924: Congress Sets Tough Quotas on Entering U.S.”, “Time Machine (1892): The first immigrants arrive at Ellis Island”, “The History of European Immigrants in the United States”, “The History of European Immigrants in the United States”, “Surges and Slips: Immigration in America over 200 years”, and “Latino Immigration to the United States: Economic Factors.”

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, students read two anchor texts that center around the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire: a nonfiction book and a historical fiction account, Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix and Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin. Other texts include an informational article, “Amnesty International Calls On Jeff Bezos To Address Amazon Employees’ Concerns About Working Conditions” by Angel Au-Yeung. Additional texts include multiple nonfiction articles detailing first-person accounts, a speech, and videos and photos that give visuals of the time period. Multiple informational texts are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as “Tenements” from History.com, “What a labor union is and how it works” from Teen Vogue online, 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 3, the Enhanced Version includes “Opportunities for Enrichment To learn more about tenement housing, have students read the following articles and resources.  Tenement Museum - Lower East Side, NY on youtube.com”, “Life in the Shop”, by Clara Lemlich and other articles from Cornell University’s Remembering the 1911 Triangle Factory Fire resources. Students can also read the song/poem, "The Uprising of Twenty Thousand," Dedicated to the Waistmakers of 1909.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students read a literary text with the same title by Lorraine Hansberry, a poem “Harlem” by Langston Hughes, articles such as “A Better Life: Creating the American Dream” by Kate Ellis and Ellen Guettler, listen to a radio segment “The Scarlet E, Part II: 40 Acres” by WNYC Studios, watch a movie  A Raisin in the Sun, and read a poetry anthology text entitled The BreakBeat Poets: New American Poetry in the Age of Hip-Hop by Kevin Coval, Quraysh Ali Lansana, and Nate Marshall. Multiple informational videos are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: “Growing up in Chicago’s Black Belt-Timuel Black” by The University of Chicago, “How Housing Redlining Contributed to the Racial Wealth Gap” (no source), and “Adam Ruins Everything: The Disturbing History of the Suburbs” (no source).

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, students read the literary work The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros that represents the vignette genre. Additional texts include the poem “There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe” by Mother Goose, an informational article “This is what happens when gender roles are forced on kids” by Emanuella Grinberg and Victoria Larned, and newspaper articles. 

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students read a graphic novel with the same title by Gene Luen Yang, articles including “Where Bias Begins: The Truth About Stereotypes” by Annie Murphy Paul, watch a video “Prejudice and Discrimination: Crash Course Psychology #39” on CrashCourse’s YouTube channel, and read a comic “What is a Graphic Novel?” by Jessica Abel.  Multiple informational videos are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: “Family Matters - Who wants pie”, “Boy Meets World - S01E16 Risky Business” and “Gene Yang: Creating a Graphic Novel.”

  • IIn Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, students read The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives, a nonfiction LGBTQ novel written by Dashka Slater. Additional texts include five nonfiction newspaper articles about the fight for gender neutral bathrooms and hate crimes, an FBI website, three videos that include first-person interviews, a timeline “Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement” by PBS, and a blog “Victory! Federal Court Rules Trans Students Must Have Access to Bathrooms That Match Their Gender” by Lambda Legal. Multiple informational texts and videos are included in the Enhanced Lesson Plan to build background knowledge, such as: 

    • In Lesson 2, the Enhanced Version includes additional resources for students to read to complete their assignment. Included are the following: Articles by Topic

  • Sip-Ins

    • “Before the Stonewall Uprising, There Was the 'Sip-In'” by Jim Farber (The New York Times)

    • “The "Sip-In" at Julius' Bar in 1966” (National Park Service)

  • Stonewall

    • “Stonewall Riots: The Beginning of the LGBT Movement” (The Leadership Conference)

    • “How the Stonewall riots inspired today's Pride celebrations” by Emanuella Grinberg (Cable News Network (CNN))

  • Pride Flag

    • “Pride Flags 101: Everything You've Ever Wanted to Know About Gay, Trans, and Other Pride Flags” by Matt Baume (Them)

    • “A colorful history of the rainbow flag” by Jacopo Prisco (Cable News Network (CNN))

  • Act Up

    • “ACT UP” by Meliza Banales (Britannica)

    • “How To Demand A Medical Breakthrough: Lessons From The AIDS Fight” by Nurith Aizenman (NPR)

  • Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (and its repeal)

    • “How the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy Affected LGBT Military Members” (Newsela)

    • “Statement by the President on the One Year Anniversary of the Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell” (The White House Office of the Press Secretary)

  • Same Sex Marriage

    • “Gay marriage declared legal across the US in historic supreme court ruling” by Dan Roberts and Sabrina Siddiqui (The Guardian)

    • “Supreme Court's same-sex marriage ruling cheered by many nationwide” by Tribune Washington Bureau, adapted by Newsela staff (Newsela)

  • In Lesson 4, the Enhanced Version includes the following directions in building background: Show students the video, “Pronouns | Trans | One Word | Cut”  by Cut (YouTube) in which trans/nonbinary people talk about pronouns and why they matter.

  • In Lesson 5, the Enhanced Version includes the following suggested support: Show students the video, “Trans People Nail The Absurdity Of The Bathroom Debate | Trans 102 | Refinery29” by Refinery29 (YouTube). Have them watch it through once, then write down the central argument that the video is making about the “debate” about trans people being able to use the bathroom of their choice.

Materials reflect a balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials reflect a 77/23 balance of informational and literary texts with 45 informational texts and 12 literary texts.

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, the materials across the unit contain 13 informational texts and four literary texts. All texts are core texts.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood so Cheap, the materials across the unit contain eight informational texts and one literary text. One of the core texts is informational, and the other core text is literary.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, the materials across the unit contain four informational texts and three literary texts. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, the materials across the unit contain two informational and two literary texts. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, the materials across the unit contain ten informational texts and one literary text. The core text is literary.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, the materials across the unit contain eight informational texts and one literary text. The core text is informational.

Indicator 1C
04/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c. 

Materials include anchor texts that are within or above the Lexile stretch band, ranging between 790L to 1350L, and the publisher consistently provides qualitative analysis rationales. There is a balance of accessible texts and more complex texts across the grade level. Even though some of the texts are somewhat below the grade band level, the required tasks, as well as the concepts and language within the texts, allow for challenging material. The qualitative analysis rationales for text selection and placement are in the Text Selection Rationale or the Notes for Teacher section. The Notes for Teacher section also informs educators what to be aware of and calls out certain features of the texts. Qualitative analysis shows that the complexity increases slightly for varying reasons, including text structure, language, and knowledge demands. The qualitative rationale states that the relationship between the texts and the associated student tasks are accessible for the grade level with instances when students move into more complex tasks. The qualitative text complexity is determined by the Achieve the Core’s Literary Text Complexity Rubric. 

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, students read a series of texts, including poetry that does not have a Lexile available, such as “Where You From” by Gina Valdez. Of the five texts that are leveled, three are above the grade level band, one is below, and one falls in the middle. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty as it contains high-level vocabulary, graphs and images that include data, and first-person experiences. The associated student tasks are moderate. The overall qualitative measure is moderate.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, students read two core texts by the same names. Flesh and Blood So Cheap (1000L) falls within the Grades 6-8 range, while Uprising (790L) has a lower quantitative measure appropriate for the beginning of the year. Qualitatively, the texts are of medium difficulty due to the content, and since students read both texts simultaneously, the need to draw conclusions from both texts. The associated student tasks are medium, giving an overall qualitative measure of moderate.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students read the text, A Raisin in the Sun (1150L) by Lorraine Hansberry, which is within the stretch band. The qualitative analysis is of high difficulty due to unfamiliar stage directions, dated language, idioms, and vernacular dialogue. The associated tasks are accessible. The overall qualitative measure is moderate.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, students read The House on Mango Street (870L) by Sandra Cisneros, which falls below the Grades 6-8 range. Qualitatively, the text is of moderate difficulty due to figurative language, Spanish words and phrases, point of view, and a variety of sentence types. The associated tasks overall are moderate, requiring students to make connections to the larger theme. The overall qualitative measure is accessible.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students read the text American Born Chinese (GN530L) by Gene Luen Yang, which falls below the Grade 6-8 range. The qualitative analysis is of high difficulty due to multiple perspectives, complex stories, time lapses, and archaic vocabulary. The associated tasks are accessible and include a Socratic Seminar. The overall qualitative measure is moderate.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LBGTQ+ Experiences in the United States, students read The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives (930L) by Dashka Slater, which falls below the Grade 6-8 range. Qualitatively, the text is of medium difficulty due to two narrators and an unconventional text structure. The associated tasks are challenging, requiring students to analyze and synthesize the text and write an argument. The overall qualitative measure is complex.

Anchor/Core texts and a series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, there is no provided Text Selection Rationale for the unit, but the publisher provides Lexile ranges between 840L and 1350L for five of the 17 texts, and all the texts support the unit theme of immigration. The Notes for Teachers section states that the topic may be difficult for some students to discuss; it is suggested that teachers tread carefully with their student population, creating a safe space for those of many backgrounds to discuss openly. A summary of the unit includes the educational purpose of the readings: “Students will read about the experiences of first-generation Americans, and the unique challenges they face as native-born Americans with immigrant parents.”

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, the Text Selection Rational includes Lexile ratings for Uprising (790L) and Flesh and Blood So Cheap (1000L). The rationale includes qualitative features to consider, such as a combination of both primary documents and quotations from people who lived during that time, the use of the third person limited point of view, setting, and vocabulary. The rationale for Uprising mentions the lower Lexile but states, “The structure of this text is unique in that the author employs a third-person limited point of view, pushing students to think critically about how the same setting and events can be perceived differently by different characters.” The rationale for Flesh and Blood So Cheap notes: “Although this book addresses a complex time in US history and covers a number of topics with which students will likely be unfamiliar, the structure used and text features included in the book makes it quite accessible.” The educational purpose of the text is to provide students with a “necessary schema to understand the setting and social context” of a historical event, the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, in the early 20th century before they read Uprising.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile for A Raisin in the Sun (1150L) by Lorraine Hansberry. The rationale includes qualitative features to consider, such as students navigating “some slang and idioms may be unfamiliar; additionally some of the characters use African American Vernacular English, which (depending on students’ background and experiences) may impact the accessibility of the text.” The Notes for Teachers section includes many warnings of explicit material, including references to abortion, racial slurs, and violent occurrences, such as lynching. The educational purpose of the text is for students to make connections between today and Hansberry’s compelling interrogation of the American dream.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile for The House on Mango Street (870L)by Sandra Cisneros. The rationale includes qualitative features to consider, such as figurative language, symbols, allusions, repetition, and unusual syntactical formations. The rationale also states that the “structure, language, and meaning of this novella'' make it an appropriate choice for students of this age. The educational purpose of the text is for students to “find that these seemingly simple vignettes are rich with meaning, as Cisneros confronts themes around gender, misogyny, coming-of-age, social class, and racial identity.” 

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile level for American Born Chinese (GN530L) by Gene Luen Yang. The rationale includes qualitative features, such as vocabulary demands and complex text structure. “The book tells three stories with three protagonists; each story is told from a different literary perspective; each story is written in a different genre; and time moves unpredictably within stories and between them.” In the Notes for Teachers section, additional resources are available to help teachers create a safe space as students grapple with references to stereotypes. While the text includes “several examples…of ‘casual’ references to homophobia, sexism, and sexual harassment”, the publisher “recommend[s] pointing these incidents out to students so that they do not go unnoticed and unnamed, and therefore normalized (as they so often are).” 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LBGTQ+ Experiences in the United States, the Text Selection Rationale includes a Lexile level for The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives (930L) by Dashka Slater. The rationale includes qualitative features, such as a narrative with two different people, nontraditional structures/genres in chapters (text messages, poetry, social media posts, etc.), idioms, instances of figurative language, and many tier-two and tier-three vocabulary words.” The educational purpose of the text is to introduce students to a number of concepts related to sex, sexuality, and gender and analyze the criminal justice system.

Indicator 1D
04/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.  

Materials include anchor and supporting texts that vary in complexity and support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year. The Unit Summary and individual lessons outline a path for growth in literacy skills over time. Texts of varying complexity are included in each unit and are interconnected to add meaning to unit topics. Students practice skills during the beginning, middle, and end of the year and learn concepts and standards. Each lesson includes a Standards Map that shows when the literacy skills appear as core or supporting standards in units.   

Materials include suggested supports in each lesson. The teacher resources provide guidance on using the supports when reading the texts. Lessons contain multiple supports, including Language Supports and Additional supports during Close Reading, which feature guiding questions and key ideas students should understand. Discussion supports include questions and graphic organizers to guide students in locating information for discussions. Some lessons include supports for the Target Task with scaffolded questions that build understanding. Although not all lessons include the same supports, lessons other than writing lessons include multiple sections of support that provide teachers with scaffolds to ensure that students can access the texts and successfully complete the lessons. 

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • One literacy skill taught throughout the year is to determine the meaning of words and phrases (RL.7.4). In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 4, the lesson objective states: “Identify examples of figurative language used in ‘America and I,’ and explain the impact of these on meaning. In the Close Reading Questions, Discussion Question, and the Writing Prompt, students analyze the figurative language and connect it to the author’s feelings about life in America. In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 4, the lesson objective states: “Explain the meaning and impact of word choice and literary devices in Langston Hughes’s ‘Harlem,’ and how they work together to develop theme.” Students read “Harlem,” define words and phrases, analyze complicated imagery and metaphors, and analyze rhymes. In the Close Read Questions, students analyze imagery, connotation, similes, and Hughes’ use of questions in the poem. In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 8, the lesson objective states: “Explain how Cisneros uses word choice and figurative language to develop tone and meaning.” Close Read Questions ask: “What is Esperanza’s tone as she tells the story of her Aunt Lupe in the vignette, ‘Born Bad’? Find at least three different words and phrases that help develop her tone.”

  • Another literacy skill taught throughout the year is to determine two or more central ideas in a text and analyze their development over the course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text (R.I.7.2). In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 26, the lesson objective states: “Determine the central message of Rose Schneiderman’s speech and explain the impact of word choice on meaning and tone.” A Close Reading Question asks: “Schneiderman writes in paragraph 3, ‘The life of men and women is so cheap and property is so sacred.’ What is the impact of Schneiderman’s juxtaposition of the words ‘cheap’ and ‘sacred’ in this sentence?” The text is at the high end of the stretch band for students in Grade 7 and accompanies the reading of two core texts, Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Haddix. In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 10, the lesson objective states: “Explain the impact of gender norms and expectations on the lives of young teenagers around the world.” Students read two articles, “Most Teenage Girls Still Experience Sexual Harassment” by Jennifer McNulty and “This is what happens when gender roles are forced on kids” by Emanuella Grinberg and Victoria Larned. RI.7.2 is a supporting standard for the lesson since students must understand the main idea to explain the impact. In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 14, the lesson objective states: “Identify central ideas in The 57 Bus and explain how Slater develops ideas over the course of the text.” The discussion and writing prompt connect to the reading of The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater: “What central idea does Slater develop on the topic of binaries? How does she use both Sasha and Richard’s stories to develop this central idea? Carefully explain your thinking.”

As texts become more complex, appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, and skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the general description of the supports available states: “The Fishtank ELA curriculum includes five types of supports to help provide students access to different features of text complexity-language supports, background knowledge supports, additional supports, foundational skills supports, and opportunities for enrichment. After you have determined the aspect of the texts that will be most challenging for your students, you can decide which supports are most appropriate. These supports can be used with the whole group, in small groups, or individually.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In the Teacher Tools, “Supporting English Learners,” the guidance states: “Learn how to provide scaffolds that help English Learners access complex texts. Explore the different types of graphic organizers that can be used as scaffolds.” The guidance for teachers is the same across all grade levels.

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 4, the “Knowledge” section includes key facts about the reading, definitions of three academic vocabulary words (figurative language, metaphor, and simile,) and sample responses to the writing prompts. The “Knowledge” section is in every unit with key facts about different academic vocabulary words. In Lesson 16, the Suggested Supports for Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge include showing students a map of Somalia and providing background information on the civil war to help students understand the reading. Additional supports in the lesson include scaffolding questions during the Close Reading and a list of additional vocabulary. A graphic organizer is included to help students organize the information to see a comparison between two perspectives. 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 4, the following support is provided in the building background section: “Note: There are several instances of quotations in today’s reading where workers compare their treatment to that of enslaved people or even imply that it was worse. While factory workers were subject to cruel and abusive practices, their experiences were not comparable to that of enslaved people. Pause during these moments to discuss this inaccurate comparison, (p. 73), how the author might have made a more accurate statement, and what these people are trying to communicate when they make this comparison.”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 17, there are supports for building background knowledge, Language Supports that identify possible words/phrases with short definitions, Close Reading scaffolding questions, and guidance for teachers to help make the reading more accessible, and a graphic organizer to identify changes in tone and the evidence to support their answers. 

  • In Unit 5: Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 8, Additional Supports during Close Reading provides scaffolding questions and the corresponding page number where students should locate the evidence to support an answer.  There is also a Suggested Support for building background knowledge and accessing prior knowledge, including a link to an article to help students better understand some of the language used in the text. Teachers are suggested to use a “drop-in” definition to help students understand difficult words.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 7, in the Target Task section, a suggested scaffold states to pose the question: “Imagine you met someone who had only seen the news report. What two important things would you want them to know/understand?

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.  

Materials include a variety of text types and genres to provide a range and volume of reading that offer opportunities for independent reading. There is support in place connecting to specific texts as students engage in these readings. Over the course of the year, students read different types of texts ranging from traditional print sources; such as literary and informational novels, newspaper articles, and magazine articles, to non-traditional sources such as graphic novel, film, and video. Students engage in a volume of reading across the school year, including reading during and outside the school day on a consistent basis. The Teacher Tools section includes procedures and routines for different types of reading, including Interactive Read Alouds, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading. The materials include independent reading opportunities that are often homework assignments; students take part in comprehensive discussions and activities related to the homework reading in class the following day. The resource, Recommended Texts for Independent Reading, makes recommendations for fiction and non-fiction texts with aligned themes and topics and additional texts by the same author.

Teacher Tools provide additional guidance for educators relating to independent reading procedures, though the guidance is often general rather than lesson-specific. For example, the Components of an ELA Lesson under the Homework heading states: “Some lessons require students to read sections of the text prior to class. Homework for the next lesson is identified. Homework should be assigned at the end of the class period.” Teacher Tools also offer guidance relating to Reading Structures and Routines, including information for Independent Reading for Homework (6–12): “...to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.” The Teacher Tools are consistent across grade levels, and the guidance provides suggestions for accountability measures, such as graphic organizers, annotations, and written checks for understanding. Though there is no specific tracking system provided, students are expected to complete reading homework on a regular basis to be able to complete in-class activities. They are held accountable to this reading through homework questions related to the assigned reading which can be found in each lesson plan. The teacher uses these questions to launch the following lesson with a quick class discussion.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and provide supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, students read multiple informational texts as anchor texts, including articles, poems, essays, websites, audio interviews, and videos, and one short story.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, students read from two novels as anchor texts, Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, a speech, and a photograph.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 4, students read the play, A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, as the anchor text. Supplemental texts include articles, a poem, a radio segment, the movie version of the play, a radio segment, and an informational book.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, students read the anchor text, The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. Supplemental texts include articles and a poem.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lessons 15, students read the anchor text, American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang. Supplemental texts include articles, a comic, and a video.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, students read the anchor text, The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. Supplemental texts include articles, videos, and a website.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and provide supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, students read multiple texts such as: Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin, Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix, and “Speech at the Metropolitan Opera House” by Rose Schneiderman. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students read multiple texts such as: A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, “Harlem” by Langston Hughes, and “A Better Life: Creating the American Dream” by Kate Ellis and Ellen Guettler. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, students read multiple texts such as: The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros, “There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe” by Mother Goose, and “Most Teenage Girls Still Experience Sexual Harassment” by Jennifer McNulty. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, students read multiple texts such as: The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater, “Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement” by PBS.org, and “Hate Crimes, Explained” by Swathi Shanmugasundaram. Throughout the unit, students engage in Close Read and Discussion Questions connecting to the assigned texts, allowing teachers to monitor student progress toward key understandings and connecting to the essential questions of each unit. Students also complete Target Tasks which provide an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding, practice essential skills, and receive feedback in preparation for the content assessments at the end of each unit. Opportunities are also available for students to engage in independent reading of assigned pages of the text as homework. 

There is teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance for a proposed schedule for independent reading is explained: “In order to show accelerated reading growth, students need to read for at least 15 minutes a day, with the greatest growth being shown in students who read over a half-hour to an hour a day.  Due to the block structure of most middle and high schools, it would be nearly impossible for students to read in class for 30 minutes a day while also having time to critically analyze the text through discussion and writing. Therefore, to ensure that all students spend at least 30 minutes reading a day, and to ensure that students have already done some of the literal thinking that will make close, thoughtful reading in class possible, sections of text are assigned for homework.”

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines, Independent Reading for Homework (6–12), guidance related to accountability is stated: 

    • “Assign an annotation focus. Have students annotate in the text to show their understanding of the text. Student annotations can be used to show that students are reading and that they understand what they are reading. Students can return to their annotations during class discussions and writing.

    • Provide Graphic Organizers. While reading, have students use different graphic organizers to interact with the text. Potential graphic organizers include: Say, Mean, Matter Graphic Organizer or Double Journal Entry.”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 5, students continue reading and working with the play version of A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry. For homework, a section of the play is assigned to be independently read. Questions are provided for students to answer, including: “How would you describe Walter and Benetha’s relationship? Provide an example from the text.”

  • In Unit 4: Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 9, Homework in the lesson plan instructs students to read “Most Teenage Girls Still Expereince Sexual Harassment” by Jennifer McNulty and “This is what happens when gender roles are forced on kids” by Emanuella Grinberg and Victoria Larned. Questions are provided for students to answer, including: “What point is the author of each article trying to make? Identify two to three key ideas from each article.”

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

15/18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The grade 7 materials include questions and tasks that require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year. The questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. There are consistent opportunities to practice speaking and listening skills as the materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. 

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, reflecting a 50/17/33 split. Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit teacher guidance on evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited. In addition, while materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. Materials include guidance on vocabulary instruction. Students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.

Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and text-dependent, referencing specific page numbers or portions of the text at times. The questions and tasks in the materials require careful examination of texts over the course of a school year, and the questions and tasks provide insights into the Essential Questions for each unit. Almost all segments of the Lesson Plan, including Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions, require students to return to the text and provide evidence to support their ideas and support students in making meaning of core understanding of the texts being studied. The program uses a common system of organization, and students answer a series of writing prompts and questions to comprehend the text, build knowledge, and understand how the reading and tasks connect to each unit's overall topic/theme. 

Materials provide support for planning instruction and implementing text-based questions and tasks, including Sample Responses and Notes for Teachers that highlight areas where students might struggle. The Notes for Teachers include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support both within and outside of the materials. Some lessons, such as Unit 5, Lesson 4, include additional lesson-specific Notes. In each lesson, the Enhanced Lesson Plans provide Scaffolding questions for both the Close Read Questions and Writing Prompts to support teachers and students in answering the questions or completing the tasks successfully. 

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 3, students read Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and answer Close Read Questions: “What is Marrin’s primary purpose in the section of text between pages 32–38? How do you know? Explain your reasoning.” and “What is Marrin’s point of view on tenements? What specific words and phrases help communicate this perspective? Provide at least three examples from pages 35–38 and explain how they reveal his perspective.” Then students answer the Writing Prompt: “What is the author’s point of view on ‘rich folk’ in New York? What specific details from the text reveal this perspective? Provide at least two examples from the text and explain how they reveal his perspective.” 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 19, in the Enhanced Lesson Plan, students read A Raisin in the Sun and answer the Close Read Question, “How has Walter’s perspective of the world changed since his money was stolen, and how does this motivate his decision to call Mr. Linder? Provide two pieces of evidence from pages 141-144 to support your answer, and carefully explain your thinking.” Teachers are provided with student understandings for students who might struggle, such as: “Walter no longer thinks it’s worth considering ‘right and wrong’ -- what matters most, above anything else, is getting money and having money. He calls Mr. Lindner because he wants the money that Mr. Lindner offered them not to move, and getting that money is more important to him than self-respect.”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 14, students answer three Close Read Questions about in The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. Specifically, they identify at least four big ideas from the text and name the main idea about justice and explain where the author develops this main idea. These questions align to the standard: “Determine two or more central ideas in a text and analyze their development over the course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text.”

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In all units, materials provide support for teachers. In the Unit Summary, materials provide a number of supports for teachers when approaching the unit texts, including an overview of both the text and the learning outcomes. The Unit Summary includes the Notes for Teachers section, which contains pertinent information about teaching the core text, such as how to approach specific lessons and where to find further supports in the materials. In each lesson, the Key Understandings section provides an overview of the Skills and Strategies that students should be learning and using. The Knowledge section provides the main ideas and plot details from the text(s). 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 15, Students read Uprising and answer the Close Read Question, “How do Jane and her father’s perspectives of the strikers differ? How does Haddix develop this difference in perspective? Provide at least two pieces of evidence to support your answer.” Teachers are provided scaffolding questions such as, “What kind of descriptive language does Jane’s father use when talking about the strikers? How does he react to Jane’s concerns about the strikers? How does Haddix use descriptions of his behavior to communicate his perspective?” Teachers are also provided with a list of key understandings that students must reach before they can successfully answer the question. 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 6, students complete a Writing Prompt: “What is each character’s perspective on what should be done with the insurance money? How does the author develop each of their perspectives? Provide one piece of evidence that demonstrates each character’s (Beneatha, Walter, Ruth, and Mama) perspective.” Materials provide a Sample Response as support with an additional note stating, “You may wish to provide students with a graphic organizer like the one that follows:” and lists three columns with the following labels: Character’s Perspective; Revealed through…; Evidence.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 5, the Notes section provides help for students to discuss and understand the text: “Students may not know the ‘meaning’ of their name or their name might not have a particular meaning. Some websites may provide meanings of different names, and you may wish to look these up in preparation for this lesson (to save time!). Tell students who do not know, or whose names do not have specific meanings, or who do not know why their parents chose their names that they have the awesome opportunity to make up what their names mean to them!”

  • In Unit 6: Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 5, the Close Reading Question asks, “What argument did Drew Adam’s attorneys make for why having to use a gender-neutral bathroom at Adams’s school was discriminatory? Provide quoted evidence from the text to support your answer.” The teacher is provided with scaffolding questions, such as, “What is Drew Adams’s gender identity? How was Drew treated before anyone knew that he was transgender? How did being made to go to a gender-neutral bathroom make him feel?” There are also supports that identify key ideas that students need to understand before answering the question successfully. 

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions. Students practice speaking and listening skills with Discussion Questions in each lesson, which are “open-ended questions designed to prompt student reflection on the day’s reading and to make connections between the text, larger social issues, and their own lives. Discussion questions often come at the end of lessons and are an opportunity to bring students together to speak and listen to one another.” The protocols support students’ developing speaking and listening skills for a variety of discussions, including different formats of whole class, small group, and partner discussions. Each unit also includes a full day of Socratic Seminar discussion.

Materials provide teachers with many options for including discourse in the classroom and the freedom to choose which protocols are appropriate for their students. Instructional supports and protocols are available in the Enhanced Lesson Plans Building Background and Engagement section in those lessons that include a discussion that gives at least some guidance on how to conduct the discussion. There are also specific guidelines in the Socratic Seminar lessons that build from the first unit to the last in each grade showing a progression in building discussion skills. The skills and protocols are scaffolded for teachers and students to build greater mastery and student independence. The Teacher Tools includes resources for how to help engage students in discourse, create a classroom culture that supports conversation, and monitor student growth. The Academic Discourse section provides teachers with four different resources for guiding and supporting students in developing speaking and listening skills. These resources are referenced and linked consistently across the units. 

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section, different types of protocols are provided. One example is a partner discussion, which includes the following protocol: Teachers choose from various discussion protocols to have students discuss open-ended questions, such as Think-Pair-Share: 

    • “Students are given time to think before pairing up and sharing. 

    • Teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. 

    • Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer.

    • Students pair up. 

    • Students take turns sharing their answers.”

  • In each unit, a Socratic Seminar is provided as a formal discussion, and students use one teacher-chosen, open-ended question from the multiple Discussion Questions provided in the lesson. The same directions are provided for the teacher in the Notes section of each Socratic Seminar lesson: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion. Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 21, teacher guidance for conducting a class discussion includes: 

    • “(1 min) Have students jot down their responses to the question.

    • (2 min) Have students talk in pairs or small groups, making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts. Circulate and listen in for strong points.

    • (2 min) Whole-class discussion. Take hands or call on students who made interesting comments during small-group discussion.

Today’s conversation should be relatively informal. You may want to have students stay in small groups for this discussion as it may allow students to be more open in their reactions.”

  • Over the course of the year, a systematic approach is used to develop speaking and listening skills through the Socratic Seminars in each unit. Examples of protocols that build mastery and independence include, but are not limited to: 

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 17, teachers introduce the Socratic Seminar and its purpose. Students read an overview of how the discussion will occur and brainstorm a list of expectations and rules. Suggested rules and expectations are included in the materials. Teacher guidance includes introducing a rubric, modeling a Socratic seminar through the use of videos and class discussion, and allowing students time to gather evidence to enhance their participation. 

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 29, students review the rules and expectations established in Unit 1 then go back to their self-reflection from Unit 1 to identify one thing they did well and would like to continue doing and one area to improve on in the Unit 2 discussion. Students gather evidence while the teacher circulates and assists students who may need help identifying appropriate evidence. There is a Discussion Graphic Organizer available for students who may need assistance with taking notes. Teacher guidance for conducting the seminar includes being certain that students understand they are to run the discussion themselves. The teacher takes notes throughout the discussion. 

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 20, the teacher shares expectations of the seminar with students. They model academic discourse strategies. Students reflect on their past discussions. During the discussion, students summarize what the person before them said to ensure that students are listening. The teacher pauses the discussion to ask students to summarize ideas that have been presented in the discussion. In this lesson, instead of the teacher helping students, students use partner discussions to try out their ideas. 

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 14, students are expected to respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. When students respond directly to the person who spoke previously, they will determine if they want to challenge, add to that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. 

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 17, the plans include a continued emphasis on having students respond directly to the ideas of other students rather than simply stating their own ideas. Protocols require students to respond directly to the person who spoke previously, determining if they want to challenge, add to that person’s idea, or introduce a new idea that has not been discussed. 

    • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 15, students identify areas from their self-reflections to continue to do well and to improve. The teacher reminds students of the rules and expectations for Socratic Seminars and the teacher allows students to run the discussions. There are some supports for assisting students who struggle to identify evidence. Students once again summarize what the person before them said and should be able to clearly identify arguments made by classmates. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse document outlines ways that teachers can “progress monitor and support students’ development of key conversation and discourse strategies.” The document includes other suggestions for support, such as:

    • “Provide sentence frames for students to use. Sentence frames should help students articulate their thoughts. Include sentence frames that use a variety of sentence structures to ensure that students have multiple options.

    • Provide scaffolding questions. If students are unable to initially answer the original question, provide scaffolding questions that build students to the deeper understandings.”  

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Tiers of Academic Discourse resource provides an explanation of each tier. Tier 1 describes how students clarify and share their thoughts. Materials provide information on three elements of instruction: Key Student Discourse Strategies, Key Teacher Talk Moves, and Sentence Frames. In Tier 2, students engage with the thinking of others; as with Tier 1, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. In Tier 3, students critique and analyze the reasoning of others; as found in Tiers 1 and 2, materials provide information on the three elements of instruction. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse resource includes an Overview statement: “The goal is that by the end of the year, students will be able to participate in academic discourse using strategies from all three components, allowing them to show a deeper and more nuanced understanding of key content. Based on data from progress monitoring, students may need additional support in order to effectively orally communicate key ideas. Use the suggested supports below to decide which support to add for the whole-class or for subsets of students.” Materials provide teachers with the following downloadable tools to use in the classroom: Academic Discourse Rubric, Discussion Self Assessment, Discussion Peer Assessment, Socratic Seminar Recording Form, and End-of-Discussion Assessment. 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 14, materials include Teacher Tools for guidance when deciding which Type of Academic Discourse to utilize in the classroom (table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion). Teachers can select which of the lesson’s Discussion Questions students will answer. Other Teacher Tools include guidance for Supporting Students with Academic Discourse, such as ensuring the transfer of knowledge: “Provide students with sentence frames. Provide students with sentence frames that reflect how their opinion or understanding may have changed. 

    • At first I thought, _____________________. Based on the discussion, I now think ____________________. 

    • Prior to the discussion I thought ____________________. My classmates ideas confirmed my ideas because _____________________.”

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

Materials include multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate what they are reading through various speaking and listening tasks in all units. The speaking and listening activities all require evidence from unit texts. Many discussions require students to have read the texts in advance to identify the author’s argument, create their own claims, and provide enough evidence to support their claims. Lessons regularly include Discussion Questions that allow students to practice speaking and listening skills. Each unit includes a Socratic Seminar. Research and formal presentation activities require data and images and offer students opportunities to ask clarifying questions of peers and work cooperatively. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, Ensuring Transfer of Knowledge, teachers instructions state: “ensure that students are able to synthesize understanding built through academic discourse.” Sentence frames are provided to support students in reflecting on their own growth during discussion: “At first I thought, _____________________. Based on the discussion, I now think ____________________.”  This connects to Tier 3 discussion sentence frames: “I want to change my idea because ______________. I want to revise my thinking. I think ______________. At first I thought ______________ but now I think ______________ because ______________.”

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 8, students listen to four audio interviews by American immigrants and answer Close Read Questions: “Read and then listen to the conversation between Philomena Luciani and Alison Purcell (Interview 2). How does listening to the audio version change the impact of their words? What does this story reveal about the American and/or immigrant experience? Provide evidence to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 14, students participate in a Socratic Seminar connecting to The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. The lesson addresses the core standard SL.8.1.d (acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, modify their own views). Teacher Tools are available including an Academic Discourse Rubric that assesses students’ ability to clarify and share their own thoughts, engage with the thinking of others, and critique and analyze the reasoning of others. Additional resources are available to support students with sentence stems they can utilize during academic discourse.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 17, students participate in a Socratic Seminar in a whole class or group conversation. The Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse section includes the Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse which provides multiple organizers to track participation and progress towards goals. One document is the Academic Discourse Rubric where teachers provide feedback on how students clarify their own thoughts or how they critique the opinions of others.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 2, students create a poster that educates classmates about a significant event or aspect of LGBTQ+ American history. A sample poster is available, and the requirements are available as a support. 

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 17, students participate in a Socratic Seminar after reading and viewing the texts. Students use textual evidence to answer various Discussion Questions, such as: “How do expectations of America compare to the realities faced by immigrants?” Students draw evidence from all the texts studied in the unit. The intent is that the Socratic Seminar is conducted as a whole class discussion, where the Types of Academic Discourse document specifically notes the execution: “All students hear the shared thoughts of the class and build on ideas together.”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 3, students listen to the radio segment, “The Scarlet E, Part II: 40 Acres.” After listening, students answer a Writing Prompt to compare and contrast White and Black Americans’ access to the American Dream and then evaluate: “What evidence does the story provide to support this idea? Is the evidence provided relevant and sufficient?” 

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 17, students participate in a Socratic Seminar to discuss the text American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang. The objective of the lesson includes, “responding directly to others by rephrasing and delineating arguments, determining the strength of evidence, and posing clarifying questions.” The Teacher Tools include support for the Tiers of Academic Discourse, including sentence frames “To question/clarify to fully understand classmates’ ideas.”

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing. Students complete on-demand prompts that connect to the discussions and activities for each lesson, and each unit includes process writing that spans more than one lesson. Specifically, students write longer essays to prompts that connect to core and supplemental texts using the steps of the writing process, including specific revision opportunities. In some units, students use digital resources to conduct research and create digital materials for presentations. The Teacher Tools include multiple resources with further details on how to provide guidance on both process and on-demand writing, including planning and executing writing lessons and strategies for giving feedback. 

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 15, students reflect on the quotation from Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix where Jane tells Bella and Yetta, “Everything I have was bought with blood.” Then, students answer the Writing Prompt, providing evidence: “What does she mean by this figurative language? How does this show that Jane’s perspective of her own life has changed? What caused this change in her perspective?”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 10, students read the poem, “Say My Name” by Idris Goodwin. After reading, they complete a Writing Prompt where they write an analytical paragraph discussing how the speaker of the poem feels about his name. Students are instructed to “Include a topic sentence, evidence from the text, analysis, and a conclusion in your argument.”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 14, the students answer the Writing Prompt; “What central idea does Slater develop on the topic of binaries? How does she use both Sasha and Richard’s stories to develop this central idea? Carefully explain your thinking.” 

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 21, the Objective states to revise a narrative for “transitions, mechanics, and organization.” Teachers can access the Giving Writing Feedback document in the Teacher Tools section that gives suggestions for Individual or Group feedback to assist with editing. The Narrative Writing Feedback and Support-- Middle School document helps teachers direct students on what and how to edit when students are struggling with organizing an event sequence, such as “Review how to use paragraphs to manage the sequence of events.” 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lessons 21-23, students write a five-paragraph literary analysis essay. Each lesson focuses on one aspect of process writing an essay, beginning with writing a strong thesis statement through a concluding paragraph, ending with revising the essay for clarity, mechanics, and organization. As homework, students check their work for the requirements using the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric. Teacher guidance includes, “Students who finish early may benefit from working as a peer-editor.” The rubric provides criteria for the introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion. There are also criteria available relating to Form and Style and Language and Mechanics.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lessons 15-18, students write a literary analysis essay for the prompt: “Write a five-paragraph literary analysis that explores one symbol from The House on Mango Street. Support your argument with evidence from the text to support your thesis. Include a strong introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion in your essay. Each lesson focuses on different parts of writing the op-ed and ends with “revise essay for clarity, mechanics, and organization.”

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 19, students “craft, edit, and revise their personal narratives.” Students can check their work and transitions utilizing A Narrative Writing: Short Story Rubric or Narrative Writing: Comic Rubric. The materials include an Editing/Revision section in the lesson when teachers provide students with an example of a strong concluding paragraph: “Remind students that the conclusion of the narrative is a way to leave the reader with a sense of resolution and also the larger message you want to share about who you are. Students should also use this time to edit and revise their work.”

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 14, students work in groups to collect research from diverse sources as they begin creating an informational poster about DACA and the DREAMers. Students are given digital sources to consult that includes a website, a video, and an article.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 10, students begin work on an informational essay to discuss “how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Students begin to research, looking specifically for examples, statistics, and quotes from experts. Students are provided four web articles from which to gather data.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lessons 16-19, students research a person from the LGBTQ+ community who should have a commemorative stamp and write a letter to the “Citizens Stamp Advisory Committee'' to argue for that person to have a stamp. Students use digital resources to research.

Indicator 1J
01/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j. 

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply different types of writing; however, the distribution does not reflect the requirements of the standards. Students write argumentative, informative, and narrative assignments, though the percentage of informative and narrative lessons is less than the percentage of argumentative lessons, reflecting a 50/17/33 split. All writing assignments are text-specific or text-dependent and are connected to a unit theme and/or yearlong theme. The materials include explicit instruction in the different types of writing within the Enhanced Lesson Plans. Additional resources are found in the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6-8) section. In addition, teacher support is offered for planning instruction and guiding student thinking with example answers in each lesson and Notes that highlight areas where students might struggle. These Notes include suggestions for teaching and links to sources of support within and outside of the materials.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing, though they do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials include uneven distribution of writing types with the following percentages for the different modes of writing: 50% argumentative, 17% informative, and 33% narrative. The number of writing opportunities in each mode is six argumentative, two informative, and four narrative.

  • In the Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the writing instruction for argumentative and informational writing are grouped together.

    • The Persuasive/Argumentative Writing or Informational Writing section includes five sub-sections: Examine Evidence, Crafting a Thesis Statement, Structure a Body Paragraph, Writing Introductions and Conclusions, and Rhetorical Appeals. A mentor text is used for the majority of writing assignments. Instructions to help students write an introductory paragraph start with students studying the mentor text and answering questions as they read, such as “What is the purpose of an introduction?” Students return to the mentor text as they write. 

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Persuasive/Argumentative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to create topic sentences that flow from the thesis statement, one “strategy is to work backwards through specific evidence to build the main claim and the topic sentences. This can also be modeled by:

      • selecting a particularly persuasive line of evidence from the research

      • building next to a topic sentence that would flow from that evidence

      • finally crafting a thesis statement that would include the sub claim from the topic sentence as part of the comprehensive argument”

    • In Giving Writing Feedback, Informational Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to use transitional words, phrases, or clauses to manage the sequence of events, teachers can “Review and model how to use transitional phrases to manage the sequence of events.

      • Transitional words or phrases can be used to show there is a transition in time. (The next day, after a while, before long, late that afternoon, the next thing I knew, etc.)”

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show there is a transition in setting or location. (In our backyard, when we went upstairs, at the post office, behind the trees etc.)

      • Transitional words and phrases can be used to show a sequence of events or to show the connection between events. (At the beginning, as a result, it started when, as soon as, in the end, etc.)” 

  • In Teacher Tools, In the Instructional Strategies For Writing Lessons (6-8), the Narrative Language section includes four sub-sections: Plot and Conflict, Language, Dialogue, and Conclusions. The Language section directs teachers to explicitly point out descriptive and sensory language in the mentor texts and suggest to students how they might include some of this language, such as mentioning that “Literary devices like similes, metaphors, and hyperbole are also a great way of drawing the reader into the text.” In Narrative Writing Feedback and Support, explicit instruction is included if students are struggling to develop a point of view or establish a context; teachers can prompt students to think about the following questions when brainstorming setting:

    • “What is the main location?

    • Are there any features of the main location that make it unique and should be highlighted?

    • Are there activities or occupations that are unique and/or important to the setting?

    • Does the setting influence the mood?

    • How does the setting influence the character’s actions?”

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 21, students analyze how one main character from A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry changes from the beginning to the end of the play. They write a five-paragraph literary analysis and must support their argument with evidence from the play to support the thesis. In Lesson 23, students draft an introduction and conclusion of the argumentative essay and revise for clarity, mechanics, and organization. Students also check their work as homework using the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric, “paying close attention to the need for transitions between ideas” and establishing and maintaining a formal style, a supporting standard of the lesson.

    • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 17, students study a mentor text for homework that connects to the current writing assignment. While reading, students annotate the mentor text, paying specific attention to the following pieces of the body paragraphs: 

      • “Topic sentence (with sub-claim)

      • Introduce the words/ideas from research (the citation)

      • Strong, relevant proof/evidence

      • Explanation (connecting the topic sentence and the thesis to the evidence)

      • Transitions (between ideas or paragraphs)”

In Lesson 19, students revise for clarity, organization, and mechanics. The Teacher Tools Writing section includes documents that give teachers specific directions on how to assist students in creating and editing for formal style. For example, suggesting to teachers “First try prompting generally to see if the student can notice their own mistake. ‘Is this a complete sentence? Why or why not?’” when they are struggling with fragments.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 10, students “Write an informational essay in which you explain how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Students are required to 

      • “Clearly introduce the topic

      • State at least three effects or impacts of racial harassment and violence

      • Gather appropriate evidence, including facts, quotes, and statistics to develop their essays

      • Include at least three linking words that clarify the relationship between ideas 

      • Provide information from all four informational texts

      • Provide examples, facts/statistics, and quotations from experts.

      • Maintain a formal style”

In Lesson 12, students “Elaborate arguments into an introduction and conclusion.”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 16, after researching the life and accomplishments of an individual in the LGBTQ+ community, students write a letter to the United States Postal Service's Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee to explain why this individual should have a postage stamp. To do so, students must consider that, in order to earn a postage stamp, individuals must make “extraordinary and enduring contributions to American society, history, culture or environment.” Therefore, students must connect their research to one or more of these ideas. As a part of this assignment, students need to write a clear introduction and a strong conclusion. To support the thesis statement, students share details from their researched information about this person’s life and accomplishments. In Lesson 18, students incorporate simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences into their writing to create a strong flow and write in a formal style.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 18, students complete a Writing Prompt assignment where they use a memory of food to explain their identity. Students are provided creative autonomy on what tone they choose for their piece, but are reminded of things they must include, such as “dialogue, descriptive details, and language that appeals to the five senses.” As homework, students study a mentor text and annotate what they learn about the author, the tone, and how the writing style helps them understand the connection between food and identity. In Lesson 21, students complete the Objective of completing their essay and editing for “transitions, mechanics, and organization.” Students can refer back to any of the mentor texts studied to see an example of this.

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 5, students write their own “My Name” vignette, modeling how Sandra Cisneros introduces her narrator in The House on Mango Street. Students introduce a narrator who will describe the literal and figurative meaning of their names, being certain to include at least one other character besides the narrator. As a part of this assignment, students use descriptive language to develop the experiences and the characters, precise words and phrases to convey their ideas, vivid sensory details to develop the experiences and the characters in this vignette, and create a strong conclusion required by the assignment.

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 30, students read multiple articles relating to current workplace conditions at Amazon and then take a stance on the question, “Does our country need to take steps to protect the health and safety of workers at Amazon?” The task connects to the two core texts, Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix and Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lessons 5 and 6, students write their own “My Name” vignette, modeling how Sandra Cisneros introduces her narrator in The House on Mango Street.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 10, students gather appropriate evidence, including facts, quotes, and statistics, to develop their informational essays. The writing task connects to articles from the unit, “The recent rise in Asian American hate crimes could have impacts beyond the pandemic” by Candice Wang and “Anti-Asian Hate Has Surged During the Coronavirus Pandemic, Reports Find” by Sara Li.

Indicator 1K
01/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

Although materials include opportunities for students to participate in writing tasks requiring analysis of and evidence from texts and other credible sources, explicit evidence-based writing instruction in the student lessons is limited to teacher guidance such as a sample writing response. Students engage in close reading tasks, develop claims for an intended audience, and support their position with evidence. Evidence used throughout the units comes primarily from texts included in the materials and independent research at times. Writing opportunities connect purposefully to the texts students are reading, and the tasks provide a means for building knowledge and writing skills across the school year. Students practice utilizing claims and support consistently, and rarely is writing done simply based on opinion.

Materials provide opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence; however, materials provide limited opportunities across the school year for students to learn about writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 10, students read the essay, “Hello, My Name Is ______” by Jason Kim, and answer the Writing Prompt: “By the end of the essay, the writer describes his feelings about being of Korean descent: ‘it makes me happy and deeply proud.’ How did Jason Kim transition from hating his Asian identity to feeling proud of it? Support your answer with two pieces of specific evidence from the text.” Additional questions as part of the Close Read include: “Remind students to read each Close Read Question and then reread the sections of text referenced in the question before writing their answer. As students answer these questions, ask them to think about how specific events made the author feel about himself and about being Asian and an immigrant. How do the writer’s experiences in the schoolyard shape his sense of identity? Support your answer with two pieces of specific evidence from the text. How do the writer’s experiences in America impact his relationship with his family? Support your answer with two pieces of specific evidence from the text. What life experiences prompted the writer to ‘learn to hate being Asian?’ Support your answer with specific pieces of evidence from the text.” The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 3, students listen to a radio story, “The Scarlet E, Part ii: 40 Acres,” and answer the question: “What claim does the radio story make about the differences between Black Americans’ and white Americans’ access to the American dream between 07:40–13:19? What evidence does the story provide to support this idea? Is the evidence provided relevant and sufficient?” The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction. The Enhanced Lesson Plan addresses relevance and sufficiency as they relate to a claim and provides questions to scaffold students as they write their claim, including:

    • “What claim does the radio story make about the relationship between homeownership and wealth at 4:09–5:15? What evidence does the radio story provide to support this claim? Is this evidence relevant and sufficient to support this claim?

    • Summarize the promise made to formerly enslaved people about land ownership and the outcome of this promise.

    • The radio story quotes a historian who says, ‘Homeownership for white people, rental for black people. And we're still living with that legacy today.’ The historian does not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that ‘we’re still living with that legacy today.’ What kind of evidence would you need to have in order to determine that the claim was sufficiently supported?”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 6, students explain how specific chapters fit into the overall structure of the text, The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. Students include “at least one piece of quoted evidence from each chapter to support” their answers. Additional questions are provided: “What does the chapter, ‘Miss Kaprice,’ (pp. 66-68) reveal about Richard’s character? Provide specific evidence from this chapter to support your answer.” The teacher does not provide students with explicit evidence-based writing instruction.

Writing opportunities are focused on students’ careful analysis and claims developed from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 31, students continue writing an argument to support a thesis with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Additional suggestions include: Have students look back at the evidence from the reading and add the quotations from the research into the “proof” section for each body paragraph. Take one point of evidence, and model what information could be extracted to write a topic sentence from that evidence. Have students share ideas to formulate the wording and organization of these topic sentences, to practice constructing their own topic sentences (sub-claims) while receiving supportive feedback.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 9, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How is Marin’s perspective of Geraldo different from how others see him? How does Cisneros develop this difference in perspective?” The instructions direct students to pull evidence from a specific vignette from the text, “Geraldo No Last Name,” from The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. 

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 11, students answer the Writing Prompt: “Gene Luen Yang explores the dangerous power of stereotypes and bias in the lives of his characters. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a surge in racial harassment and violence toward Asian Americans.” Students use the four informational texts in the unit to “explain how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Students develop a precise thesis statement and provide “examples, facts/statistics, and quotations from experts” to support the thesis. The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes detailed support for students to develop a strong thesis. There is an additional graphic organizer provided to help students frame their arguments.

Indicator 1L
01/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1l. 

Materials include limited explicit instruction for all the grade-level grammar and usage standards, and based on the information provided in the lessons, students do not have sufficient opportunities to apply these in their writing. The grammar standards are listed as core standards in the Standards Map, are referred to in some lesson objectives, and are named in writing rubrics; however, the guidance for educators is limited. Explicit instruction in the lessons is limited and does not ensure that students meet all the grade-level grammar and usage standards with the necessary support for application in context. In some writing lessons, Language Mini-Lessons are included where students have opportunities to notice how authors use language and its conventions; however,  practice opportunities for students to learn and apply the skills are limited. In Teacher Support, the Writing section addresses grammar in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction: “Fishtank ELA units teach grammar and language in context by integrating grammar and mechanics with craft and analysis. Students see how grammar and language help authors communicate specific ideas, and then learn how to use the same techniques in their Before writing.” This section also provides tips and a blank graphic organizer for students to use to create an Editing Checklist. The Teacher Tools encourage educators to provide opportunities for progress monitoring, including thinking about questions from Mechanically Inclined, such as “What have I done to teach this grammar of mechanics pattern?” The Teacher Tools are general, connecting to all grade levels and units. 

Materials include very limited explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards and few authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have minimal opportunities to explain the function of phrases and clauses in general and their function in specific sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 11, a mini-lesson is included about how an author uses punctuation, line breaks, and stanzas to convey ideas. Students do not engage in any practice to utilize the skill. In Lesson 18, the  objective states that students will “differentiate between phrases and clauses.” The Enhanced Lesson plan includes a mini-lesson introducing phrases and clauses with definitions and examples of each. Students practice differentiating between independent and dependent clauses. Students continue practicing with clauses in the next two lessons. 

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 32, the objective states that students will “incorporate simple, compound, and complex sentences into writing.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a number of “Language mini-lessons” are provided. The first is about how to differentiate between phrases and clauses with a suggested time of 15 minutes. The teacher is provided with the definition and examples of a phrase and a clause. The second mini-lesson on how to Identify independent and subordinate clauses and differentiate between simple, compound, and complex sentences is also included with a suggested time of 20 minutes. Students are given practice by completing the following task: “Locate the independent and dependent clauses, and discuss the effect of each kind of sentence in these examples from the text.” A third mini-lesson is provided containing the objective, “Combine simple sentences into compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.” with a suggested time of 15 minutes. The fourth mini-lesson covers the following objective, “Differentiate between simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.” with a suggested time of 10 minutes. Students are directed to do the following: “Read these sentences from Flesh and Blood So Cheap and decide if they are simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex. Locate the clauses (review coordinating and subordinating conjunctions).” At the end of the lesson, students discuss the following questions: “To continue the conversation, discuss the effect of each of these sentences -- how might readers be impacted differently with a different sentence type? What is the hierarchy of ideas for sentences with a dependent clause?”

    • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 18, the objective states that students will “Incorporate simple, compound, and complex sentences into their own writing.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides a Language Mini-Lesson where students review the elements of simple, compound, and complex sentences. Students read examples of each type of sentence and discuss the effects of each type of sentence. Additional practice involves students practicing writing their own compound-complex sentences and exchanging work to identify the dependent and independent clauses. Teachers are provided assistance in the Notes section: “The supplemental language lessons for this unit also support student writing and would fit well as additional writing support for sentence variety and style during the drafting and editing/revising process.”

  • Students have limited opportunities to choose among simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences to signal differing relationships among ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 21, students explore the elements of simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences. Students use examples from the text to discuss the types of sentences and then practice identifying which type of sentence each one is in a given list. 

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 32, the objective states that students will “incorporate simple, compound, and complex sentences into writing.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.7.1.b and that they should be able to “choose among simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences to signal differing relationships among ideas.” There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 16, the objective states that students will “gather evidence and develop a claim on the impact of a specific symbol in The House on Mango Street.” and “Differentiate between simple, compound, and complex sentences.” In the Enhanced Lesson, a Language mini-lesson is provided with a suggested time of 10 minutes. The teacher is told to remind students of the elements of simple, compound, compound-complex sentences. Sentences from the anchor text are used for students to practice identifying the different types. The Independent Writing section contains a recommendation for teachers to “encourage students to try using the different types of sentences they analyzed in the Language Mini-Lesson.” There is no requirement for students to incorporate this skill in their writing. 

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity, American Born Chinese, Lesson 20, students read sentences from page 25 of American Born Chinese and determine if they are simple, compound, or complex. In a Language Mini-Lesson, students use sentences from the text to practice taking simple sentences and combining them using a semicolon or a comma and a coordinating conjunction. They practice turning the same sentences into complex sentences. 

    • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 18, the objective states: “Incorporate simple, compound, and complex sentences into their own writing.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan provides a Language Mini-Lesson where students review the elements of simple, compound, and complex sentences. Students are provided with examples of each type of sentence and discuss the effects of each type of sentence. In additional practice, students write their own compound-complex sentences and exchange work to identify the dependent and independent clauses. However, explaining the function of phrases and clauses is not mentioned in the lesson. Teachers are provided assistance in the Notes section: “The supplemental language lessons for this unit also support student writing and would fit well as additional writing support for sentence variety and style during the drafting and editing/revising process.”

  • Students have minimal opportunities to place phrases and clauses within a sentence, recognizing and correcting misplaced and dangling modifiers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 22, the objective states that students should “construct a strong thesis statement and compose effective body paragraphs.” At the end of the lesson, the standards identify that students should be working on L.7.1.c and that they should be able to “place phrases and clauses within a sentence, recognizing and correcting misplaced and dangling modifiers.” A Language Mini Lesson provides information on identifying these phrases and clauses but no other guidance is provided for teaching or reinforcing this skill.

  • Students do not have opportunities to use a comma to separate coordinate adjectives (e.g., It was a fascinating, enjoyable movie but not He wore an old [,] green shirt). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lessons 17 and 18, standard L.7.3.a is listed as a supporting standard but no mention of the standard in the lesson nor instruction on writing with adjectives is provided. The linked rubric directs students to check for “appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation” but does not specifically address the standard. 

    • Unit 5,  Exploring Identity, American Born Chinese, Lesson 11, lists L.7.3.a as a supporting standard but there is no mention of the standard in the lesson and no instruction on writing with adjectives provided. The writing requirements specific: “appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation” should be used but do not specify using coordinate adjectives. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to spell correctly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 33, standard L.7.2.b is a supporting standard. There is no mention of the standard in the lesson except to check for appropriate spelling in the independent writing.

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 23, students check their literary analysis essays for “Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.” This is one of the requirements in the Argumentative Writing: Literary Analysis Essay Rubric. There is no other guidance for teaching or reinforcing this skill.

  • Students have minimal opportunities to choose language that expresses ideas precisely and concisely, recognizing and eliminating wordiness and redundancy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 7 lists standard L.7.3.a as a supporting standard. The link to the rubric includes a statement to check for precise language but there is no mention of the standard in the actual lesson nor specific instruction provided to include precise language in their writing. 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 5, the Target Task Writing Prompt provides student directions: “Use precise words and phrases, use descriptive details, and use vivid language.” There is no instruction in the lesson on how students use the language. In Lesson 18, standard L.7.3.a is a supporting standard. There is no mention of the standard in the lesson.

Indicator 1M
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

Materials include a rationale for how vocabulary should be taught and how the publisher views vocabulary as part of a lesson. There is explicit instuction of the vocabulary that is essential to understanding the text within lessons. Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice with vocabulary words and definitions for each lesson, which consists of a glossary with student-friendly definitions, word cards for display in the classroom, and a vocabulary worksheet for students. Vocabulary is included in some scaffolding questions and students have opportunities to apply the words in context. In addition, students have multiple opportunities to engage with domain-specific vocabulary words across units but do not have the same opportunity for text-based vocabulary. Teachers can assess some student learning around text-based vocabulary in each end of unit assessment. Some guidance is provided for how vocabulary is structured in the units, how to teach vocabulary, and how to support a range of learners during vocabulary instruction. The Enhanced Lesson Plans include a link to Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary; however, the guidance is not specific for the “priority vocabulary” words identified in the lesson, and other words included in the Supporting All Students section do not include a link and offer minimal guidance. The Teacher Tools share a brief overview: “Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic.” Students interact with vocabulary words through reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks. Teacher Tools include routines such as Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary and Implicit Instruction of Vocabulary. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit and lesson, vocabulary words are introduced before reading texts as necessary to understand the texts or the context surrounding them. 

  • Within the units, vocabulary words are intentionally included in many ways, so students become familiar with them through repetition, such as the words being present in questions, used during discussions, and heard in teacher-provided sentence stems. Some words are revisited from previous lessons, and students are asked to use them to indicate authentic learning of the words. Sometimes, once the lesson where the word is taught is passed, the word is not revisited. 

  • The Teacher Tools include Vocabulary guidance to share the two types of words in the materials: words to teach quickly and drop-in and words to study in-depth. The guidance includes instructions for teachers to “decide if the words are inferrable or not inferrable” and encourage learning vocabulary “indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines” rather than through explicit instruction. 

  • The Vocabulary Teacher Tool shares the ways that students interact with vocabulary words within a lesson and across the unit, such as “Close reading moments are included within lessons to analyze the use of words in context” or “When applicable, vocabulary words are used in later units in key questions or as part of word banks and sentence frames.” 

  • Materials include Explicit Instruction of Vocabulary guidance in the teacher tools section, which includes routines to introduce and review priority vocabulary. However, there is not sufficient guidance or reminders in the lesson plans themselves, to assist teachers.

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Domain-specific vocabulary is taught across multiple units. For example:

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze theme which is defined as “the author’s message in the text about the way the world works or what it means to be human. Generally applied to literary texts (fiction, poetry, dramatic works).” 

      • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 3,  students read the poem “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus to consider the theme and the evidence that supports that message. 

      • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 4, students read the poem “Harlem” by Langston Hughes to identify the theme and find supporting evidence for that message. 

      • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students read a selection from American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang to identify a specific theme of self-acceptance and provide evidence to support that claim.

    • Across multiple units, students learn about and analyze structure. 

      • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 13, students explain how the structural choices help to develop meaning in the poem “Where You From?” by Gina Valdez. Students complete a Writing Prompt answering the following question: “In this poem, the poet writes in both English and Spanish. How does this structural choice develop the meaning of the poem?” 

      • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 6 students review structure when they explain how the text Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix is structured: “What is unique about the way this book is structured? Why do you think Haddix chose this structure? What are the benefits of structuring the book this way?” 

      • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 3, students explain how Gene Luen Yang uses both text, images, and structures to develop meaning in the text American Born Chinese. Students complete the following Writing Prompt: “Reread pages 30 and 36. What is similar and different about these pages? What impact does this structural choice have on the reader’s understanding of the plot and characters?”

  • Academic vocabulary words found in texts are introduced in units, but not always taught across multiple texts. For example:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 1, the vocabulary word assimilate is introduced. It is repeated in lessons 2, 4, 5, 8 and 16. At the end of the unit, the word shows up on the assessment in the following question, “Do you think that it is possible for an immigrant to be considered a patriotic American, even if they do not fully assimilate into American culture?” 

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 3, the word languish is introduced in the list of vocabulary words. It is used in the radio segment, “The Scarlet E, Part II: 40 Acres.” The word languish comes up again in Lesson 7 when students answer the question, “Which character in A Raisin in the Sun would most likely say that they are ‘languishing’ in their life? Explain your thinking.” 

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 3, students are reintroduced to the word stereotype. In the first lesson, they watch a video and read an article that focuses on stereotypes as a concept. In Lesson 4, stereotype is used in the Sample Response for the Writing Prompt. In Lesson 5, students read the article, “That’s Not Who I Am: Calling Out and Challenging Stereotypes of Asian Americans.” The concept is repeated several times throughout this lesson. In Lesson 10, students answer the Writing Prompt about the stereotypes that the author of American Born Chinese explores and then use the novel and information from the Anti-Defamation League to write an informational essay in which they explain how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

Materials include a complete Vocabulary Glossary for each grade that notes the Part of Speech and Definition. The teacher can search for vocabulary words in the list, create a comprehensive list of all vocabulary words when “Select a Unit” appears, and create a list for each individual unit by selecting a specific unit. The Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words are broken down into the following categories: text-based, root/affix, and academic. For example, in Unit 1, the text-based vocabulary words are assimilate, asset, contentious, disdain,,,, perplexing, polarize, profound, quota, and undaunted. The academic vocabulary words are connotation, enjambment, figurative language, literary device, metaphor, personification, point of view/perspective, simile, structure, symbol, theme, and tone. Even though the words are introduced, none of the lessons include explicit instruction for how to teach the vocabulary and teachers are expected to remember to reference the teachers tools section for generic guidance. No specific words are identified as more critical than the others.

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The grade 7 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “the American experience” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. Although students practice writing, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction.

Throughout the program, the majority of instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned with the grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once. 

The grade 7 materials provide the teacher with a clear pacing guide for the school year, and the implementation schedule provided may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

20/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The grade 7 materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “the American experience” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards and include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. They also include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analytical skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts. 

The program includes culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. While there is writing practice, there is insufficient explicit writing instruction. In addition, while the materials include research projects to build knowledge, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. Moreover, the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom but the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking.

Indicator 2A
04/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2a. 

Materials include core and supplemental texts organized around the topic or theme of “the American experience” to build students’ ability to read and comprehend texts independently and proficiently. The Course Summary states that students “read texts that address diverse aspects of the American experience, including those discussing indigenous Americans, African Americans, first- and second-generation immigrants from different time periods and countries of origin, undocumented youth, and white Americans. Through these texts, students will think deeply about the complex past, present, and future of America, and how to define their ever-changing identity as a nation.” Each unit begins with a clear statement of how that unit’s materials fit within the theme and what students will be learning. The theme is supported by Essential Questions that students explore; the texts explore literary characters’ American perspectives and real-world stories, articles, and questions that build upon the initial theme. Students critically think about real-world applications of the theme in their own lives. The associated tasks connect to the theme and require students to demonstrate their understanding in various ways. The text sets, including informational texts, build knowledge and students’ content knowledge and ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. They also build students’ content knowledge and ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Additional texts are available to build background on the theme and topic, but additional questions or tasks do not accompany most suggested texts.

Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/theme/line of inquiry; texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, texts are organized around the unit theme of Fighting Injustice and the yearlong theme, “what it means to be American.” The materials have students “explore the American experience through close study of the tragic Triangle Shirtwaist Fire and the social history of the early 20th century.”

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “How does meaningful social change come about? How do gender and class shape a person’s experience of the world? What are the characteristics of historical fiction, and how do authors of historical fiction use facts when writing fictional text?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire remains one of the most significant workplace disasters in American history; the impact of this event has been far-reaching and can still be seen today. Conditions in factories were horrifying in the early 20th century, and workers had to fight tirelessly for safety, respect, and justice in their jobs; women and immigrants were at the forefront of this fight.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the two core texts and seven other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are available.

    • In Lesson 1, students read Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix. Students build knowledge about the Triangle Fire, connecting to their Enduring Understandings, and answer Close Read Questions, such as the following: “What long-term impact did the Triangle Fire have on America? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from Flesh and Blood So Cheap to support your answer.”

    • In Lesson 7, students continue their reading of Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix and “Explain how characters’ lives in Uprising are shaped by sexism and rigid gender roles,'' connecting specifically to the Essential Questions in the unit. A video is included from The History Channel to build additional background on women’s suffrage. The teacher is instructed to have students annotate spots in the text where gender is referenced in the texts and to note “[w]hat it means to be a girl, how girls and women are treated, how they are expected to behave, etc.”

    • In Lesson 8, supplemental reading for teachers and/or students is found at www.teenvogue.com/story/what-a-labor-union-is-and-how-it-works.

    • In Lesson 14, students continue their reading of both core texts Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix, as they identify how the author draws on historical facts to develop the plot of the novel. 

    • In Lesson 18, a supplemental text is “In Newark, Wrestling a Fatal Factory Fire from Oblivion.” The text helps build knowledge “about the Newark factory fire described in this chapter and provides a photograph of the factory after it burned.”

  • In Unit 4, texts are organized around the unit theme of Finding Home and the yearlong theme, “what it means to be American.” The materials have students “explore the American experience through the eyes of a young Latina girl as she struggles to define herself in relation to her community.” 

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “How does a person’s environment shape their identity? How do gender expectations define a person’s experience of the world and dreams for the future?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “‘Home’ can be both a physical place and also a symbol of larger ideas about belonging, independence, and empowerment. Challenging life experiences can motivate a person to seek out a different future for themself. Sexism can profoundly shape a young person’s life, their sense of self, and their understanding of the world.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the core text and three other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are available.

    • In Lesson 1, students begin reading The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. Students “Explain how Esperanza views her home and how living there impacts her identity,” which connects to the Essential Questions of the unit.

    • In Lesson 8, a suggestion to build background is provided: “Have students read Tupac Shakur’s ‘The Rose That Grew from Concrete’ (AllPoetry.com). In a Quick Write and/or Turn and Talk, ask students to discuss: How do you think that Esperanza would respond to this poem? What connections can you make between this poem and The House on Mango Street?”

    • In Lesson 10, students read two articles, “Most Teenage Girls Still Experience Sexual Harassment” by Jennifer McNulty and “This is what happens when gender roles are forced on kids” by Emanuella Grinberg and Victoria Larned. Students “Explain the impact of gender norms and expectations on the lives of young teenagers around the world,” which connects to the Essential Questions of the unit.

    • In Lesson 14, students draw on their reading of The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros as they answer Discussion Questions, such as “How does Esperanza’s neighborhood shape who she becomes?”

  • In Unit 6, texts are organized around the unit theme of Claiming Our Place and the yearlong theme, “what it means to be American.” The materials have students “explore the contributions and experiences of LGBTQ+ Americans in the past and present.” 

    • In the Unit Prep section, the Essential Questions are provided and refer to the theme: “What challenges have LGBTQ+ Americans faced in the past, what challenges do they continue to face, and how have they survived and thrived in spite of repression, violence, and discrimination? How does binary thinking shape the way that we understand other people and the world around us?”

    • The Enduring Understandings for the unit also help students understand the theme: “LGBTQ+ have had to fight for social acceptance and equal protection under the law in the face of discrimination, persecution, and violence. Binaries limit our understanding of people and of the world around us; the world is a much more complex and interesting place than binaries allow us to see.”

    • Throughout the unit, students read the core text and nine other texts centered on the theme and directly growing students' knowledge as they work toward the essential questions and enduring understandings. Additional texts are offered.

    • In Lesson 1, students read two articles, “Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement” by PBS.org and “LGBTQ Rights Milestones Fast Facts” by CNN. Students discuss the following question, “Why is it important to study LGBTQ+ history as we consider our year-long question of what it means to be an American?” The discussion specifically connects to the yearlong theme.

    • In Lesson 2, students create a poster and the Enhanced Lesson Plan, Close Read section, provides additional texts for each topic. Examples include: “Articles by Topic: Sip-Ins: “Before the Stonewall Uprising, There Was the 'Sip-In'” by Jim Farber (The New York Times), “The "Sip-In" at Julius' Bar in 1966” (National Park Service); Stonewall “Stonewall Riots: The Beginning of the LGBT Movement” (The Leadership Conference)“How the Stonewall riots inspired today's Pride celebrations”  by Emanuella Grinberg (Cable News Network (CNN)); Pride Flag: “Pride Flags 101: Everything You've Ever Wanted to Know About Gay, Trans, and Other Pride Flags” by Matt Baume (Them), “A colorful history of the rainbow flag” by Jacopo Prisco (Cable News Network (CNN)); Act Up: “ACT UP” by Meliza Banales (Britannica), “How To Demand A Medical Breakthrough: Lessons From The AIDS Fight” by Nurith Aizenman (NPR); Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (and its repeal), “How the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy Affected LGBT Military Members” (Newsela), “Statement by the President on the One Year Anniversary of the Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell” (The White House Office of the Press Secretary); Same Sex Marriage “Gay marriage declared legal across the US in historic supreme court ruling” by Dan Roberts and Sabrina Siddiqui (The Guardian), “Supreme Court's same-sex marriage ruling cheered by many nationwide” by Tribune Washington Bureau, adapted by Newsela staff (Newsela)

    • In Lesson 4, students read The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. Students complete a Discussion & Writing Prompt around the following questions, connecting to the Essential Questions in the unit: “How do people in Sasha’s community—family and friends—respond to them coming out as agender? What specific incidents and chapters are most helpful in clarifying the reader’s understanding of their community’s response? Provide evidence from the text to support your answer.”

    • In Lesson 15, students draw on their reading of the text The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater to answer Discussion Questions, such as “In what way does the media’s portrayal of the fire represent a binary view of the situation?” The reading and activity connect to the Essential Questions in the unit.

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b. 

Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details according to grade-level standards. Students determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular key ideas and details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments; and analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes). Materials include coherently sequenced questions and tasks to support students in developing these skills. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also provides additional scaffolding questions. Students analyze craft and structure according to grade-level standards, such as determining the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyzing how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas; and determining an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text. These skills are systematically built over the course of the unit through increasingly complex Close Reading Questions, Discussion Questions, and Writing Prompts to complete the Socratic Seminar and Content Assessment.  

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, students read multiple texts and study how an author uses details to both determine a central idea and analyze how a key event or idea is developed.

    • In Lesson 2, students read “Trends in Migration to the U.S.” by Philip Martin and answer the Close Read Questions: “Is the ‘national interest’ something positive or negative? What impact does immigration have on the United States? Beginning in the 1880s, how did the US government determine who could immigrate to the United States?” Also included is a Key Moment to Analyze “Under the motto e pluribus unum (from many, one), U.S presidents frequently remind Americans that they share the immigrant experience of beginning anew in the land of opportunity. Immigration is widely considered to be in the national interest, since it permits individuals to better themselves as it strengthened the United States.”” The Writing Prompt asks, “In a short paragraph, summarize the four major waves of migration to the United States over the past 200 years. In your summary, include an explanation of why the phrase ‘e pluribus unum’ is our national motto.” 

    • In Lesson 9, students read “An Iraqi Immigrant’s Unexpected Role” by Cynthia Agustin and answer a Discussion Question: “How has the speaker’s sense of her own identity changed since she came to America? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.” 

    • In Lesson 16, students read an excerpt from Call Me American by Abdi Nor Iftin and answer the Writing Prompt: “When comparing American and Somali culture, Sheikh Ahmed tells Abdi Nor Iftin, ‘You must choose one or the other.’ What impact does this idea have on Abdi Nor Iftin? How does Abdi Nor Iftin’s behavior change as a result of this conversation? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, students engage in an analysis of the core text.

    • In Lesson 1, students consider how the setting shapes the characters or plot connected to their reading of The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. Students complete the Writing Prompt: “How does Esperanza feel about where she lives? How does Esperanza’s interaction with the nun on pages 4-5 impact the way she feels about herself? Select two pieces of evidence from these pages to support your answer.” In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, students answer additional questions: “What does a home symbolize? What are the connotations of the word ‘home’? When is a house a home? When is a house just a ‘house’?”

    • In Lesson 10, students continue to build their skills to analyze the interactions between individuals, events, and ideas in a text when reading informational texts “Most Teenage Girls Still Experience Sexual Harassment” by Jennifer McNulty and “This is what happens when gender roles are forced on kids” by Emanuella Grinberg and Victoria Larned. Other opportunities to analyze key ideas and details connecting to The House on Mango Street in Lessons 11 and 13.

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students complete a literary analysis essay at the end of the unit to analyze how the main character changes over the course of the text considering the impact of bias or racism. The materials support students as they analyze how the author develops and contrasts the points of view of different characters. 

    • In Lesson 6, as students begin reading A Raisin in the Sun, students create a graphic organizer to analyze the question, “What is each character’s perspective on what should be done with the insurance money? How does the author develop each of their perspectives? Provide one piece of evidence that demonstrates each character’s (Beneatha, Walter, Ruth, and Mama) perspective.” 

    • In Lesson 8, students answer a series of Close Read Questions that help them analyze how the characters see themselves and how others see them: “What does Walter’s response to the check’s arrival reveal about his character and his state of mind? How does Hansberry develop our understanding of Walter’s state of mind? Provide specific evidence from pages 70-72 to support your answer.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional supports: “Close Read Question: What is Walter’s mood when he initially comes in the door? How do you know? Why is he so excited? How does Walter’s mood change? Why does it change? How do you know what he is thinking and feeling? What does it mean to be ‘frantic’? What does the fact that he ‘crumples his papers’ reveal about his mindset?”

    • In Lesson 18, students answer a series of Close Read Questions to analyze how the characters have changed again in the story. The Writing Prompt asks, “How has Mama’s perspective on her dreams changed since the revelation that the money is gone? How does Hansberry develop her perspective? Support your answer with two pieces of specific evidence from the text.” All the questions help the students develop a clear understanding of how and why the characters change in the play, supporting the completion of the writing task.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 1, Enhanced Lesson Plan, students analyze the author's craft when answering: “How would this statement be different if the nun simply said, ‘You live there?’ without italics? If needed, unpack the following figurative language:”windows so small you’ d think they were holding their breath.” An additional scaffolding question asks,”What does Esperanza mean “I am a red balloon, a balloon tied to an anchor”? What is the ‘anchor’?”

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students write a personal narrative essay or comic at the end of the unit. They explore how they have been influenced by someone else in either a positive or negative way. Throughout the unit, students read the novel, American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang, and explore both how the author develops and contrasts points of view. 

    • In Lesson 2, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does the Monkey King’s perspective of himself change over the course of the chapter? How does the author use both text and illustrations to convey this change in perspective? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional supports:

 Scaffolding question(s):

  • “What do you notice about the facial expressions and body language of the monkeys when they are with the Monkey King? 

  • How do the monkeys react when the Monkey King announces that he is leaving to attend the dinner party? ”

  • Students should understand:

    • “Monkeys have respect and admiration for Monkey King.

    • The Monkey King feels confident that he belongs at the party because he is a powerful deity, while the guard does not see him as an equal to the other guests.

    • Students may be confused by the first panel on page 10, as he is hitting a monkey over the head and both monkeys look unhappy—ask students to consider what the narration box says, and whether it is possible for a leader to discipline/punish and also be respected and loved?”

  • Sentence frame(s):

    •  While the Monkey King ________ the Guard __________.

    • Initially _______________, but _____________.”

  • In Lesson 6, students answer the Writing Prompt: “How does Tze-Yo-Tzuh’s perspective on the Great Sage differ from how the Great Sage sees himself? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.” 

  • In Lesson 8, students answer a series of Close Read Questions: “What is Danny’s perspective of his cousin Chin-Kee? Support your answer with at least six examples from the chapter that communicate this point of view: three from images and three from the dialogue. How does Danny’s teachers’ perspective of Chin-Kee differ from Danny’s? How does the author use both text and images to communicate this difference in perspective? Provide examples from the text. How does the author develop the idea that the “audience’s” perspective of Chin-Kee is different from Danny’s? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.” All of the questions support students to understand the point of view to use in the writing task.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 3, students read The 57 Bus: A Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater and “Describe how a text is organized, how specific chapters fit into the overall structure of the text, and how the author makes structural choices to develop the reader’s understanding of characters, setting, and plot.” A series of Close Read Questions include:

    • “How does the second chapter, ‘Oakland, California,’ contribute to the reader’s understanding of events, setting, and/or characters in the text? Provide at least two pieces of specific evidence from this chapter to support your answer.

    • How does the chapter ‘Tumbling' contribute to the reader’s understanding of events, setting, and/or characters in the text? Provide at least two pieces of specific evidence from this chapter to support your answer.

    • How does the chapter ‘Pronouns' contribute to the reader’s understanding of events, setting, and/or characters in the text? Provide at least two pieces of specific evidence from this chapter to support your answer.”

Students practice the same skills connecting to their reading of the core text in lessons 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, and 13.

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c. 

Materials include sequences of text-based questions and tasks that support students’ abilities to integrate knowledge and ideas in individual texts and across multiple texts. The materials provide opportunities for students to improve their analysis skills through questions and tasks that are purposefully sequenced to assist students in deepening their understanding of texts. The questions help students in the successful completion of the culminating tasks, such as Socratic Seminars.

Throughout the units, students analyze a series of big ideas using the knowledge they have built throughout the unit. This is evaluated in one, and sometimes both, of the culminating tasks at the end of the unit. In all units, students read a variety of texts that center around the theme and central idea of the unit. They use the different texts to convey their understanding in the culminating tasks. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 8, students compare and contrast stories presented in different forms of media and explain how these stories illustrate aspects of the immigrant experience in America. The questions and tasks students complete allow students to compare and contrast the transcript of an audio interview with Bianca Alvarez and Connie Alvarez with a text to an audio version of the interview text, analyzing each medium's portrayal of the subject. Students listen to four audio interviews given by immigrants to America and answer the writing prompt about each of the interviews:

    • “How does listening to the audio version change the impact of their words? 

    • What does this story reveal about the American and/or immigrant experience?” The materials point out that students should gain knowledge that “An audio recording can give a listener more information about the speaker's emotion and personality than may be evident from simply reading their words.”

The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes additional supports for this lesson. In Additional Supports, teacher directions state, “If needed, play the interview twice. The first time through, students should just listen. The second time through, have students think about the following questions: What do you notice about the speaker's voice? Do they have an accent? What can you infer about the way they are feeling by their tone? How quickly or slowly do they speak? How confident or shy do they sound, etc. Any other music, sound effects, silences, recording quality?”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 3, students listen to the radio segment, “The Scarlet E, Part II: 40 Acres.” The Close Read Questions help students to identify the claim and consider how the evidence supports it:

    • “What claim does the radio story make about the relationship between homeownership and wealth at 4:09–5:15? 

    • What evidence does the radio story provide to support this claim? 

    • Is this evidence relevant and sufficient to support this claim?” 

In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, there are additional supports to provide for students to be successful in answering the close read question. In Close Read, the scaffolding questions include: “What claim is being made about the topic? What reasons and evidence, if any, are used to support this claim?” In the Supporting All Students section, further support is provided with scaffolding questions including “What is intergenerational wealth? What happens to a property after a person dies? What impact can inheriting property have on a person?””

This is connected to the Writing Prompt, which also encourages students to identify the argument and determine what evidence supports it, thus fulfilling the standard RI.7.8: “What claim does the radio story make about the differences between Black Americans’ and white Americans’ access to the American dream between 07:40–13:19? What evidence does the story provide to support this idea? Is the evidence provided relevant and sufficient?” 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 5, students read two articles, “Victory! Federal Court Rules Trans Students Must Have Access to Bathrooms That Match Their Gender” by Lambda Legal and “We Need Gender Neutral Bathrooms Everywhere” by Adryan Corcione, and watch a video, “Trans People Nail The Absurdity Of The Bathroom Debate | Trans 102 | Refinery29'' by Refinery29. This lesson provides a coherently-sequenced series of questions to help students analyze a single text and across texts. 

    • First, there is a Discussion and writing prompt question: “What argument do the people in ‘Trans People Nail the Absurdity of the Bathroom Debate’ make? What reasons do they provide to support this argument? Provide at least three reasons/pieces of evidence provided and explain why they are relevant to the argument.” Then, students answer Close Read Questions that help them further analyze each argument.

    • “What argument did Drew Adams’s attorneys make for why having to use a gender-neutral bathroom at Adams’s school was discriminatory? Provide quoted evidence from the text to support your answer.

    • What reasons does the court provide for why they decided to rule in Drew Adams’ favor? Provide at least two pieces of quoted evidence from the article that demonstrates their reasoning.

    • What evidence does the article “We Need Gender Neutral Bathrooms” provide to support the argument that gender-neutral bathrooms are needed in public places? Select two pieces of evidence that they use to support this argument.”

Finally, students answer Discuss Questions: 

  • “Drew Adams felt that being asked to use a gender-neutral restroom was discriminatory, while the other two sources we read/watched today argue that gender-neutral restrooms are a positive thing for trans people. Why do you think this is? Can both of these arguments be true?” 

Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 8, students analyze two texts, Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin and Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix. Students answer the Close Read Questions: 

    • “How has Haddix drawn from history in her discussion of scabs on pages 83–84? 

    • How does her account differ from the description of scabs on pages 78–79 of Flesh and Blood So Cheap? Provide evidence from both Flesh and Blood So Cheap and Uprising to support your answer.” 

Students then complete a writing prompt: “How has Haddix drawn from history in her discussion of ‘fancy women’ on pages 84–85? 

  • How closely does the novel reflect historical fact? Provide evidence from both Flesh and Blood So Cheap (pages 79–80) and Uprising to support your answer.” Students practice the same skill, compare and contrast a fictional portrayal of a time, place, or character and a historical account of the same period as a means of understanding how authors of fiction use or alter history, again later in the unit during Lessons 14 and 25. 

In Lesson 14, students answer Close Read Questions: 

  • “Has Haddix accurately represented or altered historical facts in her description of rich people’s reaction to the speakers at the Carnegie Hall meeting? Support your answer with evidence from both Uprising (p. 180) and Flesh and Blood So Cheap. (pp. 99–100)” 

  • Students complete a writing prompt: “How has Haddix drawn on historical facts to describe the end-of-strike agreement on pages 182–183 of Uprising? Has she altered or omitted any details included in Flesh and Blood So Cheap? (p. 103) Support your answer with evidence from both texts.” 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 10, students read two articles about gender roles and norms that correlate with the themes throughout the novel and answer Close Read Questions: 

    • “According to the article, ‘This is What Happens…,’ what is the relationship between gender norms and mobility? Why does this relationship exist? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the article to support your answer. 

    • According to both articles, what are some of the stereotypes and gender norms that people have about both boys and girls? Provide as many as you can.

    • According to both articles, who reinforces gender norms? What are the risks of not conforming to gender norms? Provide at least one piece of evidence from each article to support your answer.” 

    • The Enhanced Lesson plan includes Scaffolding Questions to build understanding: “Who is making sure that young people follow gender roles? What happens if someone does not conform to gender roles?”

In Lesson 11, students answer the following questions; 

  • “How is Rafaela’s experience of the world influenced by gender? Provide evidence from the vignette, ‘Rafaela Who Drinks Coconut & Papaya Juice on Tuesdays’ (pp. 79–80), and carefully explain your thinking. 

  • How is Sally’s life—both at home and at school—shaped by beliefs and expectations around gender? Provide examples from the vignette ‘Sally’ (pp. 81–83) and ‘What Sally Said’ (pp. 92–93) to support your answer.

  • How does Esperanza feel about Sally? In what ways does Esperanza see herself as similar to Sally? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from pages 81–83 from the text.

  • How has Esperanza’s mother’s life been shaped by gender expectations and social class? How does she feel about this? Provide two pieces of evidence from the vignette, ‘A Smart Cookie,’ on pages 90–91 to support your answer. “

  • The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes Scaffolding Questions to build understanding: “Who has power in Rafaela’s relationship? How would her life be different if she were not a woman? How does being female impact the choices that Rafaela has available to her? What do the sweet beverages in Rafaela’s life represent?” 

In the Socratic Seminar, students discuss the following question, “How do gender expectations and roles shape Esperanza’s experience of her neighborhood and the world in general?”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 7, students analyze the way that author Dashka Slater develops the readers’ understanding of the fire on the bus and compares news reports about the incident with facts and details she includes in the text The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives. Two videos students examine include “Oakland California Victim in Bus Burning Fire” and “Oakland Police Seek Witnesses, Good Samaritans Aboard AC Transit Bus” by KRON. The unit provides students with opportunities to analyze how two or more authors writing about the same topic shape their presentations of key information by emphasizing different evidence or advancing different interpretations of facts. Students complete a Discussion & writing prompt around the following question:

    • “What details about the incident on the 57 bus does Slater include that are not included in the news report ‘Oakland California Victim in Bus Burning Fire’? 

    • What details are the same in both accounts? Select two differences and two similarities in these two accounts.”

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d. 

Materials include culminating tasks that allow students to demonstrate knowledge of the unit topics and themes by integrating reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. Though the culminating tasks focus primarily on writing skills, students fulfill the grade level standards across the year. One type of culminating task is a Content Assessment that “pushes students to synthesize unit content knowledge or unit essential questions orally or in writing” and “should be used as the primary assessment because it shows mastery of unit content knowledge and standards.” Content Assessments are found at the end of each unit and include two to four sections that include vocabulary, grammar, and content knowledge questions, multiple choice and/or short answer questions connected to excerpts from multiple texts, and an essay connected to texts.  In addition to the Content Assessment, culminating tasks within each unit include Socratic Seminars, essays, and presentations. The culminating tasks connect in a meaningful way to the unit themes and essential questions. The questions and tasks in each lesson that are connected to texts and research opportunities scaffold students towards the successful completion of the culminating task. For example, Writing Prompts, Close Read Questions, and Discussion Questions provide opportunities for students to explore the topic and themes to demonstrate their understanding. The culminating tasks offer some variety for students since Teacher Tools offer different types of academic discourse, and the questions vary according to the unit texts and themes. The guidance is general in the Teacher Tools that connects across Grades 6–8.

Culminating tasks are evident and varied across the year and they are multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 29, students participate in a Socratic Seminar for one culminating task related to Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and Its Legacy by Albert Marrin. Teachers determine what type of discourse they will use and present students with questions connected to the essential questions and theme, such as “What do these texts reveal about the role of protest in making social change?” and “In what ways has the Triangle Fire (and its aftermath) impacted the present?” In Lesson 34, students complete the Content Assessment. Students answer vocabulary questions in Section 1. In Section 2, they cold read “The Stolen Party” by Lililana Heker from CommonLit and “Virginia Just Became the 38th State to Pass” the Equal Rights Amendment. Here's What to Know About the History of the ERA” by Tara Lawand and answer multiple choice and short answer questions. In Section 3, students reread the Section 2 text and two other texts, “The U.S. might ratify the ERA. What would change?” by Patricia Sullivan and an excerpt from “Stepping Through History: A timeline of women's rights in the United States” by Susan Milligan. They write an op-ed to answer the following question: “Is the ERA necessary today or have women already made all the progress promised by the ERA?” Several Speaking and Listening standards are assessed through these activities alongside supporting Reading: Literature, Reading: Informational Text, and Writing standards.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 14, students participate in a Socratic Seminar as one culminating task related to The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. Teachers determine what type of discourse they will use and present students with the following questions: “How does Esperanza’s neighborhood shape who she becomes? How do gender expectations and roles shape Esperanza’s experience of her neighborhood and the world in general?” Notes are available for the teacher who must decide on the type of academic discourse to use in the lesson. Speaking and Listening and Reading: Literature standards are addressed in this lesson. In Lesson 25. students complete the Content Assessment. In Section 4, students answer the following prompt: “In ‘What’s Your True Age?’ by Susan Krauss Whitbourne, she argues that age is just a number and that people grow and change because of their experiences. In the short story, ‘Eleven,’ Sandra Cisneros develops the idea that the protagonist is made to feel deeply ashamed, a response she might not have had as a small child. Write a three-paragraph essay in which you explain why the character feels this way.” Several Speaking and Listening, Reading: Literature and Writing standards are assessed.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 17, students participate in a Socratic Seminar as one culminating task connected to the graphic novel American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang and other supplemental texts in the unit build knowledge about the experiences of Asian immigrants to the United States and how stereotypes and prejudice impact their lives. Examples of supplemental texts include but are not limited to: “Where Bias Begins: The Truth About Stereotypes” by Annie Murphy Paul, “Anti-Asian Hate Has Surged During the Coronavirus Pandemic Reports Find” by Sara Li, and “This Chinese-American Cartoonist Forces Us to Face Racist Stereotypes” by Joshua Barajas. Some of the questions they discuss include, “Would this story have been as impactful if it were written as a traditional novel? What are the benefits and downsides to the genre of the graphic novel? Why do you think that Yang decided to (at least initially) tell three different stories in one book? How does each story intersect? At the beginning of the book, Jin tells the herbalist’s wife that he wants to grow up to be a Transformer. How does this idea repeat throughout the text? What does this book tell us about the American Dream? How do you think that Yang would define the American Dream?” Speaking and Listening and Reading: Literature standards are addressed in the lesson. In Lessons 18-20, students write a narrative essay or a comic that explores “how and when you have been influenced by someone else.” Throughout the unit, the students read about how the main character struggled to find a sense of place and identity in America. They also discuss how other people can influence how one views oneself in either a positive or negative way. Students use writing and language standards in the task. In Lesson 21, students complete the Content Assessment. In Part II, students read an excerpt from a speech by Gene Luen Yang and write an essay about either text. Reading: Informational Text standards are assessed as students complete Passage 2: Gene Luen Yang Speech.

Indicator 2E
02/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e. 

Materials include frequent writing opportunities and address different types of writing to support students’ writing development; however, materials miss opportunities for explicit writing instruction and lesson guidance. Students practice writing in every lesson, and student directions for tasks encourage them to use tools, such as graphic organizers, checklists, and rubrics to help them brainstorm, organize, and edit their writing. Materials include different types of writing tasks that are embedded in the curriculum, connecting to the topics and texts students are studying. Writing opportunities include short written responses, research projects, presentations, and longer writing tasks. Many lessons include the practice of essential writing skills to meet grade-level standards; however, explicit connections to the standards and guidance to assist students in their learning and completion of the writing tasks are lacking. Student writing lessons at the beginning of the year provide appropriate scaffolds and structure in the design of the lesson prompt and correlating materials. Materials include new and more challenging writing tasks with less or no scaffolds as students gain more writing independence.

Teacher guidance includes protocols to support teachers in implementing and monitoring students’ writing development. General guidance is found in the Teacher Tools, such as Instructional Strategies for Writing Lesson (6–8), which is a separate resource. More specific guidance is provided in the Progress Monitoring and Assessment Teacher Tool which includes a tool for teachers to reflect and decide upon which assignments, including writing assignments, they will monitor and what they will look for within those assignments.  The Formative Assessment portion of this tool includes a section on scoring and responding to the Target Tasks as well as the Writing Assignments.  For the Target Tasks, which are daily argumentative writing assignments for Grades 6–8, a rubric is included.  For the Writing Assignments, some guidance on what to monitor is provided, as well as a link back to the Giving Writing Feedback tool. Each lesson plan includes the Enhanced Lesson Plan that provides many writing supports for teachers.

Materials include some writing instruction that aligns with the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • All units and lessons include opportunities for students to write in some form. Throughout each unit, each lesson plan begins with a writing prompt, though the prompt is intended to be answered by students at the end of the lesson. An educator could make the connection that the Close Reading and Discussion questions will assist students in successfully answering the prompt. The answers expected for each prompt vary in length, with all questions relating to the lesson texts. A smaller project incorporates writing within the first third of each unit. These are assignments such as analytical paragraphs or research presentations. At the end of each unit, students complete a full process writing assignment that spans multiple lessons. Students learn about the mode of writing being used and collect evidence, brainstorm, write a draft, edit, and publish their final papers. The materials almost always include sample answers and mentor texts as well as specific ways for teachers to address gaps in learning and rubrics to assist in grading and self-assessing. Although materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice writing, standards-aligned explicit instruction is largely absent. 

  • In Unit 2, there are a total of four lessons focused on argumentative writing, where students write an op-ed in the form of an essay. Specifically, students answer this question and must take a position: “Does our country need to take steps to protect the health and safety of workers at Amazon?” The teacher reads the prompt for the Target Task and introduces the RAFT strategy to interpret the writing prompt. When the teacher models the strategy, materials do not provide guidance on modeling; materials include a breakdown of the components relative to the prompt. The teacher does not model how to write an op-ed.  

  • In Unit 4, there are a total of six lessons where two are focused on narrative writing, and four lessons focus on writing a literary analysis essay. In the narrative lessons, students write their own “My Name” vignette based on what they read in The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. The teacher does not model how to write a vignette. With the literary analysis essay, students identify a symbol in The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros and write a five-paragraph essay that explains the symbol’s connections to belonging, independence, and empowerment. The teacher reads the prompt for the Target Task, introduces the RAFT strategy to interpret the writing prompt, and builds background on symbolism using provided resources. The teacher does not model how to write a literary analysis. 

  • In Unit 6, there are a total of five lessons where one is focused on literary analysis and the remaining lessons focus on an argumentative letter that requires research. In the literary analysis lessons, students analyze the use of second person point of view in The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and the Crime That Changed Their Lives by Dashka Slater. The teacher unpacks the prompt and reviews narrative point of view with the students but the teacher does not provide explicit instruction on writing an analytical paragraph. In the argumentative writing lessons, students read and research various individuals in preparation to write an argumentative letter to the United States Postal Service's Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee to offer a recommendation on who should receive a postage stamp. The teacher reads the prompt for the Target Task, introduces the RAFT strategy to interpret the writing prompt, and reads through provided research with the class for background and context. The teacher does not model how to complete the Articles for Individual Student Research (7th Grade Unit 6) resource or how to write an argument.

Instructional materials include models and sufficient, specific, and well-designed guidance, protocols, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Target Task Writing Support (6–12), various instructional strategies are available to support students during the prewriting, drafting, and post-writing stages. In the prewriting stage, teacher guidance includes breaking down the prompt, providing sentence stems, and encouraging rereading. During writing time, the guidance includes giving batch feedback, chunking independent time, and holding teacher conferences. The after-writing guidance includes having students reflect on their writing, using a rubric, and using a Show Call and Discourse routine. Also, in the Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction section, teachers can download an Editing Checklist (6–8.)

  • In the Teacher Tools, teachers are provided with five sections to use during instruction: Preparing for A Writing Lesson, Writing Structures and Frameworks, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8), Giving Writing Feedback, and Target Task Writing Support (6–12). These sections provide various guidance to support writing instruction, such as rubrics, sample feedback, and structures for using mentor texts.

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 6, students plan and outline a prose poem that explores what it means to be human. There are instructions to support students in learning the requirements, such as “A prose poem is not broken into verse lines, but still uses poetic devices such as symbols, metaphors, and other figures of speech.” There is no sample response available. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, teacher support includes reviewing poetic devices, including personification, symbolism, and theme, with examples and explanations for each.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 11, in the Enhanced Lesson Plan, students receive detailed instruction on how to write a summary. Teacher guidance provides detailed instruction on information students should be given and a list of guidelines for students when writing a summary. There are also explanations of the most challenging parts of writing summaries.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 10, students read the poem “Say My Name” by Idris Goodwin and complete a writing response to identify how the speaker feels about their name. Before teaching, the Preparing For a Writing Lesson document in the Teacher Tools suggests that educators follow a process for how they will internalize the lesson they’ll teach. In the Enhanced Lesson Plan, the teacher guidance suggests students complete a TP-CASTT. Suggestions for how to answer each part of the graphic organizer are included. 

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 17, on the third day of the writing lessons, the lesson Objective is twofold: “Construct a strong thesis statement and compose an effective introduction. Combine simple sentences into compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.” The Homework for the day is to “finish the essay introduction. Read the Mentor Text”, which explores a related but different prompt. In Lesson 18, student homework is to “finish their final essays.” The Enhanced Lesson Plan includes detailed guidance in how to draft a thesis statement including guiding questions to help students identify the “big picture.” Teachers are then provided guidance on walking students through writing by reviewing how to write their introduction by reviewing the function of the introduction and the components of the introduction. For both parts of the process, the plan provides the instruction for teachers to circulate throughout the class and provide feedback to the students according to individual needs or provide batch feedback when appropriate.

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 10, students write an informative essay relating to a set of informational articles to explain how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The lesson includes requirements for the essay and a sample response for support, including a Works Cited. In Lesson 18, students write a narrative about a time they were influenced by another person. Before writing, an exemplar paper is given to help students identify pieces of a model narrative response such as transition words, a logical organization, and dialogue.

Indicator 2F
02/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f. 

Materials include research projects to build knowledge; however, there is neither a clear progression of research skills in the assignments moving from providing more scaffolding to less scaffolding, nor an increase in rigor in the research-based assignments. While the Teacher Tools include some general information about teaching research-based assignments in the classroom, the lesson-specific information about how to teach individual lessons is lacking. Research projects are present in some units, but there is no explicit instruction around the research writing standards. Research projects follow a topic closely related to the overall unit theme but do not draw on texts in each unit in conjunction with outside sources. Throughout the year, students are guided in doing research that builds on the foundations provided in Grades 6 and sets a foundation for the research they will be conducting in Grade 8. They are provided with opportunities to gather information from print and digital sources. The Teacher Tools, Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) explains the different structures and routines included in the writing lessons; one structure includes Researching/Gathering Evidence. 

Research projects are not sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • The Teacher Tools include a general suggestion in the Instructional Strategies for Writing Lessons (6–8) for students to cite research, sharing Citation Machine as a possible online citation builder. There are also suggestions for presenting examples and non-examples of credible sources to students. 

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 30, students read  “‘I'm not a robot’: Amazon workers condemn unsafe, grueling conditions at warehouse” by Michael Sainato, “Amnesty International Calls On Jeff Bezos To Address Amazon Employees’ Concerns About Working Conditions” by Angel Au-Yeung, and “I Worked at an Amazon Fulfillment Center; They Treat Workers Like Robots” by Emily Guendelsberger. Using evidence from the research, students write an op-ed that answers the question: “Does our country need to take steps to protect the health and safety of workers at Amazon?” While citation information is not specifically included, the sample response has both in-text citations and a Works Cited page. Despite the associated standard being listed as a core standard for this lesson, students are not required to use search terms effectively since the researched information is provided.

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 10, materials list the following core standard: “Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.” Students write an informational essay to explain “how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.” The Writing Prompt includes instructions that students include information from four informational texts and provide examples, facts/statistics, and quotations from experts. A Sample Response is provided, including in-text citations and an example of a Works Cited. There are no instructions on assessing the credibility of sources, paraphrasing, or citing their evidence to avoid plagiarism with a standard format. 

Materials sometimes support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, general guidance to Research/Gathering Evidence is provided: “There are many ways to approach research tasks depending on the main objective of the writing project. If the focus is on selecting, analyzing, and disseminating information, it can be helpful to provide students with the research to use. This process can be scaffolded, depending on student need and development, from using all instructor-selected research, to using provided research as a starting point, or to guiding students in the practice of finding their own research.” Other suggestions include annotating, using a graphic organizer to keep track of information, offering a mini-lesson on paraphrasing, supporting students in learning how to collaborate, evaluate sources, and cite research. The lessons lack sufficient explicit instruction of research skills to ensure student mastery of grade-level standards.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lessons 2 and 16–19, students research contributions the LGBTQ+ community has made and explain the impact of those contributions in two discussion and writing tasks. For both tasks, students are provided with a starting point but are required to do their own research.

Materials provide some opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. 

  • Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 14, materials include a short research project as a core standard when students gather and synthesize information on DACA and DREAMers from diverse sources to create an informational poster. The writing project ties to three readings, including “American Dreamers” by The New York Times, and the article “What is DACA and Who Are the DREAMers?” by Anti-Defamation League, and one video, “DACA, explained” by Vox. Students answer the following questions:

      • “What is the Dream Act? Who are the DREAMers?

      • What is DACA?

      • How did DACA change the lives of undocumented people? Provide specific examples.

      • What are the risks of eliminating DACA? Provide specific examples.”

There is no Sample Response available as a reference for the task. A graphic organizer is provided in the lesson plans with instructions that each student completes on their own. The lesson plan provides 25 minutes for the following: “Have each student select three of the essays from the ‘American Dreamers’ article and take notes in their graphic organizers. Each member of the group should be reading different essays for this jigsaw activity.” The Opportunities for Enrichment section provides five additional articles from Newsela. The writing project extends over two lessons. Materials also address conducting short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation as a core standard in Units 5 and 6.  

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 30, students conduct research around the question: “Does our country need to take steps to protect the health and safety of workers at Amazon?” by reading provided articles about the current working conditions at Amazon. Students use the sources to complete a Writing Prompt. In the Research/Gather Evidence section of the lesson plan, teacher instruction states: “Together, read 2–3 of the articles listed in today's materials; this can also be done in pairs as a jigsaw, depending on the needs of the class. Set the purpose for reading as gathering evidence. One option is to use two different colored pens or highlighters as students read to track evidence, one for each side of the argument:

    • The government needs to take steps to protect the health and safety of workers at Amazon.

    • Amazon is already protecting the health and safety of its own workers.

By annotating the articles, students can then return to the evidence that will support the side of the argument they choose to write about tomorrow.”

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 16, students research a member of the LGBTQ+ community’s life and write a letter arguing that this individual deserves to have a postage stamp made in their honor. Students are instructed to use researched information to support their thesis statement. In the Research/Gather Evidence section of the lesson plan, instructions state: “As a class, read through and discuss the following research for background and context. This will help students write the context section of the introduction or as the focus of one body paragraph.” Four articles are provided to answer the prompt, “Why does representation matter? Why is it important to honor LGBTQ+ icons and leaders?” Teachers are instructed to give students the document, Articles for Individual Student Research. Then teachers are to “have students read and take notes on the articles about the individual they have chosen. Set the purpose for reading today as gathering evidence. By annotating the articles, students can then return to the evidence that will support their nomination in the next lesson.”

  • Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 30, students read multiple articles and collect research to complete a Writing Prompt where they take a stance on current working conditions at Amazon.

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 4, students read a selection from The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros and "There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe” by Mother Goose. Students reflect on why Cisneros opted to use this nursery rhyme and identify the main idea that Cisneros expresses in the two vignettes. Drawing evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research is listed as a supporting standard, not a core standard.

    • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 2, the materials address the skill as a supporting standard when students create a poster that educates classmates about a significant event or aspect of LGBTQ+ American history. The Discussion & Writing Prompt asks students to “Create a poster that introduces your classmates to the topic you have read about.“ A Sample Response is available. Materials include “Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research” as a supporting standard in all other units.

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

08/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

he grade 7 materials include instruction, tasks, and assessment questions in which the majority are aligned with grade-level standards. By the end of the school year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed by the program, although there are a couple of standards that are only covered once. While the materials generally adequately address reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language standards, the instructional support of the language standards, in particular, is lacking. 

Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 7th Grade English, to plan for the whole school year. The implementation schedule provided in the materials may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days, allowing teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g. 

Instruction, tasks, and assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Materials outline how the year-long instructional plan aligns with grade-level Core Standards and Spiral Standards as indicated in the Standards Map and in each Unit Overview. At times, standards addressed in lessons are not listed on the Lesson Map; there are also instances where standards are included at the bottom of a lesson but there is no explicit instruction or connections to the standards present in the lesson. The instructional sequence is relatively consistent as students read core and supplemental texts connecting to a common topic or theme, answer Close Read Questions and Discussion Questions, and complete a Writing Prompt connecting to the assigned reading. Lessons include opportunities for the teacher to provide students with standards-aligned explicit instruction. The questions and tasks connect to the required grade level standards, including Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Language Standards, and they require students to include evidence from texts they are reading as they work on skills such as inferencing or analyzing certain aspects of texts. Opportunities to address language standards are present, though instructional support is lacking. Materials provide an answer key for each Content Assessment, which lists the standards addressed by each assessment item. There is a Standards Map and lesson plans reflect standards covered. 

Over the course of each unit, instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Course Summary includes a detailed description of what will be studied, including a rationale for the anchor texts, the enduring understanding focused on throughout the year and a Standards Map that outlines which standards are addressed in each unit. For example:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lessons 14–15, the lesson objective is as follows: “Gather and synthesize information on DACA and DREAMers from diverse sources in preparation for creating an informational poster.” This objective aligns to W.7.7, one of the core standards listed for the lesson. The teacher informs students that they will work “in small groups to create a poster that explains what DACA and the DREAM Act is.” Students complete a graphic organizer as they watch and read through the three provided resources—a website, an article, and a video.For homework, students select two more essays from the provided website, “American Dreamers” by the New York Times, and continue filling out their graphic organizer. In their small groups, students create in informational poster that answers the following questions: “What is the Dream Act? Who are the DREAMers? What is DACA? How did DACA change the lives of undocumented people? Provide specific examples. What are the risks of eliminating DACA? Provide specific examples.”

Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, different types of tasks align to standards. Close Read Questions require students to analyze complex text and respond to standards-aligned, text-based questions. Discussion Questions connect to the texts. Many questions and tasks, including the Writing Prompts, require students to use text-based evidence, which requires inferencing. For example:

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 12, students read the vignette, “The Monkey Garden” in The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros. While reading the vignette, students respond to the following Close Read questions: “How does Cisneros use imagery and figurative language to develop the mood of the garden on pages 94–95? Provide at least three examples from these pages and explain what mood they develop. How does Cisneros develop the idea that the garden is mystical/magical? Provide specific examples from pages 95–96 to support your answer. What does Esperanza realize about the situation between Sally and the boys? How does Cisneros develop the reader’s understanding of Esperanza’s emotions as she comes to this realization? Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text and explain what they reveal about Esperanza’s state of mind.” After reading the vignette, students write in response to the following Target Task prompt: “Some have suggested The Monkey Garden is a vignette about ‘coming of age.’ With this in mind, write a paragraph in which you explain what the garden itself symbolizes, and why at the end of the story Esperanza says that she never went back. Provide at least two pieces of evidence from the text to support your answer.” These questions and tasks align to two of the core standards listed for the lesson.

      • L.7.5: “Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings.”

      • L.7.5a: “Interpret figures of speech (e.g., literary, biblical, and mythological allusions) in context.”

Over the course of each unit, assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In each unit, materials provide an Assessment Answer Key for the end-of-unit Content Assessment. The Assessment Answer Key labels each question with the corresponding standard. For example:

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Content Assessment Answer Key, in Section Two: Content Knowledge and Understandings, students respond to a justified response question: “PART A: On pages 195– 198, how does the author express Jin/Danny’s point of view after the transformation? PART B: Which panel best supports the answer above?” The answer key lists RL.7.5 and RL.7.6 as the corresponding standards for Part A and RL.7.1 as the corresponding standard for Part B. Students select the panel that best supports their response in Part B (RL.7.1) and analyze how Gene Luen Yang develops a character’s point of view in Part A (RL.7.6) as well as how the form or structure Yang uses in American Born Chinese contributes to its meaning (RL.7.5).

By the end of the academic year, the majority of standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Standards Map notes that each unit is designed to deepen “student mastery of a set of grade-level standards. These are split into core standards (standards especially important for understanding the core text and knowledge of the unit) and spiral standards (standards that students repeatedly use as they engage with, discuss, or write about a text).” However, there are instances in which standards are addressed one time across the school year. For example:

    • The following standards do not repeat across units in the Standards Map for 7th Grade English and in the list of standards for each unit:

      • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, RL.7.9 is listed as a core standard. Materials address this standard in Lessons 8, 14, and 25, but materials do not provide opportunities to address this standard in other units.

      • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, RL.7.7 is listed as a core standard. Materials address this standard in Lessons 9 and 16, but materials do not provide opportunities to address this standard in other units.

Indicator 2H
04/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 2h. 

Materials include multiple planning tools, including the Pacing Guide for 7th Grade English to plan for the whole school year. Each unit contains a separate implementation schedule and each lesson includes a pacing guide. The Standards Map shows how the Common Core State Standards are taught over the course of the year. The pacing guide allows teachers to add days to the units to cover the material appropriately for their students; however, no alternative schedules are provided. Additional guidance for planning is included in the Teacher Support tools, such as Preparing to Teach Fishtank ELA, Preparing to Teach an ELA Unit, Components of an ELA Lesson, and Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA. The implementation schedule may be reasonably completed in a school year because there are fewer lessons provided than average school days giving teachers the freedom to add re-teach lessons or extend others. Materials do not include optional tasks, only core materials and activities. The core materials provide opportunities to practice and reach mastery of most grade level standards, though grammar standards would need additional guidance. 

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Support, ELA Teacher Tools, Planning for a Year of Fishtank ELA, materials provide an implementation schedule with suggestions for teachers to address re-teaching and fit other assessments or school events into the lesson progression. 

  • Materials include six units with a total of 140 lessons over 146 instructional days. The Pacing Guide for 7th Grade English states, “Each unit includes a specific number of lessons, including writing lessons, Socratic Seminar lessons, and two days for assessment.” There are no alternative implementation schedules, though the program provides time for teachers to create assessments and make instructional decisions to support students. The Grade 7 Focus Area Overview provides details relating to each unit’s core standards and spiral standards. For example, in Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 17, Notes are available for the teacher: “Decide which Type of Academic Discourse you want to use in this lesson. We recommend a table-group discussion, fishbowl, or whole-class discussion (see our Teacher Tool about Types of Academic Discourse to learn more about each type). Then, choose which of this lesson’s Discussion Questions you are going to have students answer. Consider how much discussion time will be devoted to each question.”

Suggested implementation schedules may be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Pacing Guide for 7th Grade English, the implementation schedule states, “Our 7th Grade English units span 147 days. We intentionally did not account for all 180 school days to allow teachers to fit in additional review or extension, teacher-created assessments, and school-based events.” There is no alternative implementation schedule present. Similarly, each unit contains a separate implementation schedule. For example, in Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun,  there are 24 Lessons to be taught with a suggested implementation time of 29 days. Two additional days are suggested for the Content Assessment. 

  • In each unit, each lesson includes multiple Close Read Questions, a Target Task Writing Prompt, and often Discussion Questions. Each lesson includes a pacing guide for teachers that presents how long they should spend on each of these tasks within the class period. Homework is listed for almost every day of the unit that students complete to stay on schedule with the pacing guide, typically reading, sometimes writing. In lessons with Socratic Seminars, the task can be completed in one class period.

    • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 2, students answer Close Read Questions, Discussion Questions, and a Writing Prompt with a brief response. Based on the pacing guide, it is assumed that this lesson could be completed in one day. In Lesson 20, students write an op-ed with a “strong introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion.” No homework is noted to be assigned, and this could take most students multiple class periods to complete. Teachers may choose to extend this lesson as needed.

    • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 7, students answer three Close Read Questions, one Discussion Question, and a Writing Prompt: “Reread the passage on page 5 where Esperanza has a conversation with a nun about where she lives. Then reread page 45. What perspective do these two nuns have on the neighborhood where Esperanza lives? How does their perspective impact the way that Esperanza feels? Provide evidence from both passages to support your answer.” In the Homework section of the lesson, students are assigned to read pages 56–64 of the novel.

Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No optional tasks are included.

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No optional tasks are included.

Overview of Gateway 3

Usability

The grade 7 materials do not meet expectations for usability. Materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. 

The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level in both regular content and assessments. There are various types of assessments in the program, including unit content assessments, formative and summative assessments. While an answer key is provided for all assessments, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key. The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. 

Materials include general support throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students. Still, the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson, as the variation of the structure in lessons is limited.

The program does not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited.

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

08/09

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

The grade 7 materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. While the materials include this general teacher guidance, they only provide limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. 

The materials also include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson for teacher use. Materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.

The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, there is no letter template provided.

Indicator 3A
02/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a. 

The materials include guidance to assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials, providing sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions within the context of specific learning objectives. In each unit, links in the Enhanced Lesson Plan allow teachers to download student materials for use in the lessons. These materials include a vocabulary package and the option to turn the Key Questions, Target Task, and Exit Ticket into student handouts. The Enhanced Lesson Plan also includes specific suggestions for how to incorporate materials within the lesson plan, including explanations for use, directions for how to frame and utilize supports, reminders, sentence stems, and key places to stop in texts for all sections of the lesson. These key stopping points include the Comprehension Review and Vocabulary, the Close Read, the Target Task, and the Class Discussion sections. Each lesson contains one or more Objectives for students to meet and a list of core and supporting Common Core Standards covered in the lesson.

Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a Unit Summary with explanations of how the anchor text was selected and how the supplemental texts support the anchor text and themes in the unit. Each module includes a Unit Launch to help the teacher understand the unit. The Unit Launch includes five steps: Introduction, Understanding the Text, Unit Essential Content, Key Reading Standards, and Key Writing Standards.

  • The lessons offer guidance for teachers to support all students by Building Background and Accessing Prior Knowledge, and guidance is available consistently around the Target Tasks across the grade level. An example of additional support is when the materials offer Sentence stems and Scaffolding Questions for teachers to utilize when following the Close Read procedures.

  • Each non-writing lesson includes a Comprehension and Vocabulary review at the onset of the lesson. This section includes specific teacher guidance on how to introduce vocabulary words, including the use of word walls, vocabulary logs, and vocabulary cards. Students review key vocabulary from the previous lesson. Materials provide links to specific strategies to teach vocabulary words. Materials also differentiate words into content-specific academic categories and provide guidance explaining the difference to students and the teaching of each. The Unit Summary includes a comprehensive list of the vocabulary for the unit, including part of speech and definition.

  • In the Unit Launch, Understanding the Text, the goal is to “build [teachers] understanding of how students might experience the unit text(s) based on these interconnected aspects of text complexity.” For example, Unit 2 includes the following subsections with descriptions, examples specific to the unit, and reflection questions for the teacher:

    • What Makes the Text Complex

    • Understanding the Supplemental Texts

    • Your Students and These Texts

    • Reflections on the Author

Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 8, the Key Understandings section includes Skills, Strategies, and Knowledge that students will gain in the lesson. In each section of the lesson, the teacher is provided with directions on how to present the content. For example, directions in the Building Background section state: “Explain to students: Today they will focus on the interaction between individuals and their environment or individuals and specific experiences. This essay is all about a specific location (America!) and the way the narrator is changed by her experiences there. In determining how setting/experience shapes characters, it can be helpful to consider how the character’s experience would be different in a different setting (would she have the same thoughts or feelings if she lived in Russia?) or had a specific event not occurred. In this way, students may be better able to isolate the specific impact of that plot element.”

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 4, the materials offer guidance for Supporting All Students in the form of a Close Read Procedure and include specific Key Moments to Analyze, connecting to the poem “Harlem” by Langston Hughes: “Students should notice the following words: 

    • ‘fester’

    • ‘stink’

    • ‘crust’

    • ‘sags’

    • ‘syrupy sweet

    • ‘heavy load’

    • ‘explode’”

There are Scaffolding Questions available to support students in providing three examples from the text to explain whether the words Hughes uses in the poem have mostly a positive or negative connotation, such as “Hughes refers to candy, which is generally something positive – are all the words he uses to describe the candy positive?”

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 15, materials provide specific vocabulary review questions to support the teacher with monitoring students’ understanding of previously taught words. Examples of questions include, “Do you believe that it was inevitable that Danny would turn back into Jin at some point? Explain your thinking. Do you think that Jin will be a more devoted friend to Wei-Chen in the future? Explain your thinking?” Inevitable is a vocabulary word from Lesson 8, and devotion is from Lesson 12.

Indicator 3B
01/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3b. 

The materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts that the teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject; however, they do not contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course. Each unit provides a Unit Prep section with Notes for Teachers that include some additional contextual background; however, it does not provide support in teaching grade-level concepts within the lesson plans. Explanations are included in the Teacher Tools of different aspects of the curriculum and teaching techniques or different strategies related to the knowledge demands of each unit. Still, they are not lesson- or text-specific. The explanations of the concepts are specific to the approaches taken by the materials and do not provide any additional opportunity for teachers to expand their understanding of a concept.

Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, multiple sections present specific information on how to prepare the unit, internalize a unit, and understand the different components of an ELA lesson. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Writing, there are specific full-length explanations of Learning to Write and Writing to Learn. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, there are explanations of Intellectually Preparing a Unit, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Scaffolds for English Learners, Engineering Texts, Oral Language Protocols, and Using Graphic Organizers as Scaffolds. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, there are explanations of Categories to Progress Monitor and Types of Assessment for Progress Monitoring, including Formative Assessments and Summative Assessments. 

  • In the Vocabulary section of the Teacher Tools, there is an explanation of how the vocabulary is built into the units and an explanation of how students build vocabulary through interacting with Tier II and Tier III words. There is then an in-depth explanation of how to teach the words within the text. There are no specific examples or modeling provided. There is further instruction for teachers on how to teach vocabulary through both an implicit and explicit approach with guidelines and strategies but no specific examples or modeling.

  • In the Teacher Tools, Providing Access to Complex Texts section, there are detailed explanations of what makes a text complex and how to provide access and support for more complex texts being used by students. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Routines for Active Reading section, there is an explanation of what active reading is and then more in-depth explanations of various forms of active reading, including Interactive Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Partner Reading, Small Group Reading, and Independent Reading. 

  • In the Unit Launch section of the curriculum, materials provide the teacher with an opportunity to internalize the essential questions of the unit. The teacher has opportunities to explore the questions as well as sample answers to the questions. In the section “Considering Who and Where You Are,” the teacher has an opportunity to reflect on biases or gaps in knowledge that might impact the teaching of the unit. 

Materials contain limited adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 6: Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Unit Overview, the Notes for Teachers section provides context by stating, “You may have students who are out as LGBTQ+ in your classroom, but it is equally important to teach this unit with the knowledge that you very likely have LGBTQ+ students in your classroom who are not out. There are many fantastic resources available for supporting LGBTQ students and building awareness of queer issues and history in your classrooms.” The text then provides additional resources for teachers to consider, such as “Developing LGBTQ-Inclusive Classroom Resources” by GLSEN, “Safe-Space Kit: A Guide to Supporting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Students in Your School” by GLSEN, and “10 Tips for Building a More LGBTQ-Inclusive Classroom” by Joe English.

Indicator 3C
02/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c. 

The materials include correlation information for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level. The Unit Prep section contains a list of the standards covered in each unit and in each lesson.

Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • For each unit, the Lesson Map table includes a list of addressed standards. At the beginning of each unit in the Unit Prep, there is also a section titled Common Core Standards, where the core and supporting standards are listed. 

  • The end of each lesson in every unit includes a list of Common Core Standards and Supporting Standards, which are defined as “Standards that are practiced daily but are not priority standards for the unit.” All are hyperlinked to a pop-up window with the full text of the standard.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 11, materials list Common Core Standard RL.7.2 as a core standard and L.7.6, SL.7.6, W.7.4, RL.7.1, W.7.10, W.7.9, RL.7.10, W.7.2, W.7.9.a, RL.7.4, W.7.2.a, SL.7.1, W.7.2.b. as Supporting Standards.

Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Unit Launch section of the curriculum, materials provide an explanation for the key reading and writing standards. The teacher works through unpacking the essential standards by answering questions concerning the standard and how it connects to the unit. Questions include: “Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)? What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?” Once the teacher enters a response, they are given the opportunity to view the publisher’s answer. The next step is to “Apply the Standard.” In this section, the teacher is provided with a set of tasks that are included in the unit and answers the question, “Reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.” In Step 3, “Define Mastery,” the teacher reflects on the skills that students must develop to answer the target tasks successfully. Each step in this internalization of the unit has publisher exemplar responses to help deepen understanding.

  • The Unit Launch for each unit includes a section entitled Unit Essential Content. Guidance notes, “The goal of this section is for you to review and fully understand the key content knowledge of a unit prior to teaching. Doing this work prior to teaching the unit will help you endure that students internalize the key content knowledge by the end of the unit.”

  • In the Unit Essential Content section, materials describe Key Reading Standards: “For each unit, we have identified the key reading standards of the unit. These key standards are among the most important in helping students understand this unit’s texts. These standards represent a subset of the reading standards covered in the unit and work in conjunction with the other standards noted at the unit level. For each standard, you will reflect on why the standard is particularly useful for making meaning of the unit’s core and supplemental texts. You will apply the standard to specific Target Tasks from this unit and analyze how the standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly complete the task. Finally, you will reflect on what students will ultimately need to know and be able to do to demonstrate mastery of this standard. This work will help you ensure that students are interacting with the texts and tasks at the right level of rigor and depth.” For each standard, teacher guidance includes the following prompts and materials provide a mastery response after submission:

    • Step 1: Unpack the Standard

      • Read and analyze the language of this key reading standard.

      • Considering the language of the standard above, answer the questions below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:

        • Why is this standard important for understanding the key ideas and themes of this unit’s core text(s)? 

        • What are students likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard?

        • Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale as to the importance of this standard and what students are likely to notice and learn as they build proficiency with the standard.

    • Step 2: Apply the Standard

      • Below are a set of tasks from this unit that require students to have a strong understanding of this key standard in order to answer each question correctly. Read each task, the appropriate section of the text, and our sample response. Then, reflect on how understanding this standard helps students better analyze the section of text and correctly answer the task.

      • After the task, a reflection question is provided.

        • Consider the question below and record your thoughts in the provided fields or in the provided note template:

          • How does applying this key standard help students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task?

          • Teachers can then check their answers by expanding the “View Our Response” section in which they are provided with the curriculum writers’ rationale on how this key standard helps students better understand this section of text and correctly answer this Target Task.

  • In the Unit Essential Content section, Key Writing Standards are described.“In this section, you will explore the key writing standards of this unit and what mastery of these standards looks like in the context of the unit. These standards represent a subset of writing standards covered in the unit and were selected because they are among the most important in helping students write in response to the text(s). First, you will closely read the language of the standards in tandem with the unit’s culminating writing task. Then, you will examine an exemplar response to the task and reflect on how the standards help students proficiently complete the writing task.”

    • Step 1: Unpack the standards

      • First, read and analyze the language of the key writing standards.

      • What are key understandings of these standards? What do they ask students to know and be able to do?

    • Step 2: Apply the Standards

      • Now, read this unit’s culminating writing task, followed by our example of an exemplar response. While reading the exemplar, notice and annotate for evidence of the standards.

      • Use the following questions to guide your annotations: 

        • How does this exemplar show mastery of the standards? 

        • What do students need to know and understand in order to complete the writing task?

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

The materials do not include provisions for informing parents, students, or caregivers about the ELA program. The materials include a suggestion to inform parents about sensitive content in the unit; however, materials do not provide a letter template. Materials provide limited information to guide teachers relating to the content covered in each unit or lesson. Materials do not include information on how parents or caregivers can help students succeed in the program. 

Materials contain limited strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Unit Prep, Unit Summary, the Note for Teachers section suggests the following for teachers: When the “sensitive topic” of abortion is included in the text, “consider letting parents know about this content before students read these sections of text in class.” When “offensive language is used, “Prepare students for these passages and discuss as a class their reactions to these words.” Materials do not provide additional guidance for teachers on how to craft communication or prepare students for the passages. 

Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3E
02/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e. 

The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program and include an annotated bibliography that references the research-based strategies. The Teacher Tools includes explanations of the instructional approaches for the program, including references to the research behind them and bibliographic credits connected to the research. Materials provide a concise explanation of each ELA component and explain how the program is designed to teach the components to accomplish the stated goals. The Our Approach section emphasizes the flexibility of the program and its focus on being culturally relevant. 

Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In the Our Approach section, the materials explain the approach taken in general terms, including a focus on texts over skills, criteria for content selection, the foci for writing instruction, and approaches to discussion and word knowledge. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide an explanation of how the materials approach each ELA component:

    • In Writing, Approach to Language and Grammar Instruction, the explanation states: “Language and writing instruction are embedded within all Fishtank ELA units from K-12. Language instruction is a powerful tool to help students understand the decisions authors make and how they impact the effect their writing has on readers. Learning grammar and mechanics is about studying the intentional decisions authors make, noticing the power of different punctuation, sentence structures, and craft choices, and then trying out those strategies in their own writing. When learning different grammatical structures, students zoom in on sentences to notice the connection between mechanics, craft, style, and meaning. Language instruction isn’t separate from reading instruction because the connection between language and the author’s craft is integral. Because language instruction is so deeply connected to reading instruction, it should not be taught in isolation. And as far back as 1936, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) found that formal teaching of grammar and mechanics had little effect on students’ writing and even had deleterious effects on student writing when it displaced writing time. Instead, language instruction should be organically embedded into all aspects of reading and writing so that students can authentically grapple with and understand how different structures impact meaning.”

    • In Reading Structures and Routines, the explanation states that the goal of the curriculum is to build independent and strategic learners. The approach is explained as providing students with multiple opportunities to interact with a wide variety of texts independently, with the goal of having students read the core texts independently with little support. 

    • In Vocabulary, the explanation states: “Vocabulary development is intentionally built within all Fishtank ELA units. Within units, students build their academic vocabulary by learning and interacting with Tier II and Tier III vocabulary words that are essential for unlocking the meaning of the text, task, or topic. Throughout the unit, students have multiple opportunities to engage with words orally or in writing. Depending on the word, vocabulary words are taught both directly or indirectly. Fishtank ELA does not rely on a single vocabulary instructional method; rather, instruction happens strategically within units so that students learn vocabulary indirectly and unconsciously through daily reading, writing, listening, and speaking routines.”

    • In Writing, the explanation states: “Fishtank ELA includes opportunities for students to both learn to write and write to learn. Students will be immersed in reading, writing, discourse, and idea-generation cycles in each unit. There is no separate writing block and no separate writing curriculum; all writing instruction is embedded directly into lessons and units. Through embedded on-demand and process-writing assignments, students build powerful, evidence-based arguments and develop their voices in various genres. Because students need solid knowledge and understanding of a subject matter to write, all Fishtank ELA writing assignments are connected to a core text or ask students to write about content knowledge from the unit, ensuring that all students have equal access to the assignment.”

  • In the Fishtank guiding principles, materials provide the following information: “In Literature units from Kindergarten through 8th grade, students read texts that explore themes applicable to their lives while also building knowledge of historical events and time periods. Most of the literature units focus on developing identity, diversity, justice, and activism, which are key components of Learning for Justice’s Social Justice Standards. The content of all of our K–8 units, both Literature and Science & Social Studies, aim to provide students with windows and mirrors to ensure students see their own identities, experiences, and motivations in texts (mirrors) alongside texts that allow students to gain insight and build empathy for the identities, experiences, and motivations of others (windows) (Style, 1996). And, wherever possible, our units aim to engage students in discussions of current events. We also frequently update our units to incorporate articles and discussion topics that reflect current issues in the world around them.”

  • The Fishtank guiding principles also include the following reference: “Rather than organizing lessons around specific skills (e.g., how to find the main idea) and teaching these skills in isolation, we organize our curriculum around carefully-selected texts that will engage students and facilitate deep thinking and strategy development. The text, and the demands of the text, drive the focus of a particular unit or lesson. Text-dependent questions in each lesson are sequenced in order to build a deeper understanding of the key ideas and themes presented by the text. Units across the curriculum require students to read a combination of longer texts to build stamina and engage in discussions about the full text, as well as close readings of specific passages or excerpts. Text-dependent questions and close readings push students to pay close attention to the author’s craft and text structure, word choice, and challenging vocabulary and syntax (Coleman and Pimentel, 2012). All grade-level Common Core Standards are carefully woven into the units and lessons, introduced and reinforced through text-dependent questions and close reading moments, and work in service of deep understanding of the text.”

Materials include and reference research-based strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Teacher Tools, Writing, bibliographic references to multiple sources used in the development of their program include: 

    • Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov 

    • Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin

    • Writing for Understanding: Using Backwards design to help all students write effectively by J. Hawkins, E. Ginty, K. LeClaire Kurzman, D. Leddy, and J. Miller

    • The Writing Revolution: A Guide to Advancing Thinking Through Writing in All Subjects and Grades by Judith C. Hochman and Natalie Wexler  

  • In Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, bibliographic references to multiple research sources in the development of their program include: 

    • Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain: Prompting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students by Z. Hammond

    • Reading Reconsidered: a practical guide to rigorous literacy instruction by Doug Lemov

    • Academic Conversations: Classroom Talk that Fosters Critical Thinking and Content Understandings, by J. Zwiers and M. Crawford

    • Common Core Standards in Diverse Classrooms: Essential Practices for Developing Academic Language and Disciplinary Literacy by J. Zwiers, S. O’Hara, and R. Pritchard

  • In Teacher Tools, Text Selection, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:

    • Revised Publishers’ Criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, Grades 3–12 by D. Coleman and S. Pimentel 

    • “Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy,” by Gloria Ladson-Billings

    • Why Knowledge Matters by E.D. Hirsch, Jr. 

    • Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework and Historically Responsive Literary, Gholdy Muhammad, and “Curriculum as Window and Mirror” by Emily Style 

  • In Teacher Tools, Reading Structures and Routines: Close Reading, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include:

    • Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading by K. Beers and R.E. Probst

    • Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading by D. Fischer and N. Frey

    • Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--and Life by C. Lehman and K. Roberts 

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners: Scaffolds for English Learners, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include “Essential Actions: A Handbook for Implementing WIDA’s Framework for English Language Development Standards” by Margo Gottlieb

  • In Teacher Tools, Vocabulary, bibliographic references to multiple research sources used in the development of the program include Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction by Isabel Beck and Common Core Appendix A.

  • In Teacher Tools, the explanations of the Match Fishtank approach to writing, vocabulary development, and language and grammar instruction are followed by “resources referenced in the development of” each section.

  • Additional reference sections include Qualitative Complexity of Fiction Texts, Providing Supports for Text Complexity, How Texts are Selected in the Teacher Tools, Academic Discourse, Close Reading, and Foundational Skills.

  • The Foundational Skills section and its subsections entitled Teaching Reading Fluency and Assessing Reading Fluency, as well as the subsections of Academic Discourse entitled Types of Academic Discourse and Tiers of Academic Discourse, the Subsections of Supporting English Learners entitled Scaffolds for English Learners and Oral Language Protocols, and the subsection of Progress Monitoring and Assessment entitled Formative Assessments include embedded footnotes with references.

Indicator 3F
01/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f. 

The materials and lessons provide a list of texts needed for the unit. In every unit folder, the materials provide student handouts for all instructional activities.

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit plan contains a list of the texts being read throughout the unit with hyperlinks to the texts (either for reading or for purchase). 

  • Each lesson folder contains all the handouts students will need for the lesson. 

    • For example, for Unit 1, lesson 1, the lesson folder contains separate student handouts for the homework, key questions, and target task.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

08/10

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

The grade 7 materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The program includes unit content assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short and long-constructed responses, text-based discussions, written reflections, and essays. Each unit also includes standards-based formative and summative assessments. 

The materials provide an answer key for each assessment in the program with the corresponding assessed standards. While an answer key is provided, there is insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key provided. In addition, the materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments.

Indicator 3I
02/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i. 

The materials include Content Assessments that cover the standard and practices for the grade level. Each assessment includes a teacher answer key which lists the standards the assessment addresses.

Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains an assessment that addresses the content covered during the unit. The answer key document includes a table that contains an answer key and the standards that each assessment question addresses.

Indicator 3J
02/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3j. 

The materials include limited opportunities to determine students’ learning and insufficient guidance for interpreting student performance beyond the answer key  provided. Most support occurs through a series of protocols and questions that teachers can use to respond to student data. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and some guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains one formal assessment that covers the content of the unit. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Progress Monitoring and Assessments section includes a data analysis protocol. Materials provide probing questions for teachers to use to assist in discussing the assessment. Categories covered in this protocol include the Teacher Preparation Unit, Teacher Preparation Lessons, and Lesson Execution. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, the Summative Assessments section contains the Data Meeting Protocol Guide, which includes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a Data Meeting. The guide has two parts. Part 1 explains how to use  data to identify strengths and growth areas; Part 2 explains how to use data to reflect and plan next steps. 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students’ learning and no suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Formative Assessment section provides several frameworks that teachers can use to monitor and respond to various types of student work. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Progress Monitoring and Assessment, the Summative Assessment section provides a data meeting protocol that teachers can follow to identify instructional next steps.

  • While the Teacher Tools in the program provide a framework for teachers to use, materials do not include clear, codified suggestions for certain student misunderstandings.

Indicator 3K
04/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.

The materials include assessments that measure the expectations of the standards regarding rigor and depth. The materials include unit Content Assessments that contain a variety of item types, including short- and long-constructed responses, text-based discussion, written reflection, and essays. Each unit includes standards-based formative and summative assessments. Summative assessments include standards-based constructed responses aligned to culminating discussions, presentations, or on-demand writing. Each unit includes instruction and assessment opportunities aligned to anchor writing standards. Students write essays to inform or to express a claim, or they write narratives. When used as a summative assessment, students complete these on-demand writing tasks independently.

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 34, the Content Assessment requires students to read a story and then answer multiple choice questions based on the text, such as “How do Rosaura and her mother’s perspective of rich people differ?” Students must find the paragraph where the author develops the difference in perspective. Another question requires students to read a sentence from Flesh and Blood So Cheap and determine if it is simple, compound, or complex.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, the Content Assessment requires students to write an essay with at least three fully developed paragraphs to explain why the character feels ashamed. 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, Lesson 19, the Content Assessment requires students to read a passage and answer multiple choice questions such as identifying evidence that is not relevant to the author’s claim, determining why the author included the first two paragraphs of the text, and determining word meaning based on context. 

  • Examples of formative assessments include:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 2, students answer the question: “In a short paragraph, summarize the four major waves of migration to the United States over the past 200 years. In your summary, include an explanation of why the phrase ‘e pluribus unum’ is our national motto.”

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 8, students answer the question: “Identify characters’ points of view in A Raisin in the Sun and explain how the playwright develops differences in perspective.”

  • Examples of summative assessments include:

    • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 22, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (L.7.1, L.7.6, RI.7.3, RI.7.1, RI.7.6, RI.7.4, W.7.3).

    • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 24, students complete the end-of-unit Content Assessment (L.7.6, L.7.1, RL.7.6, RL.7.1, RL.7.3, RL.7.4, RL.7.2, W.7.1).

    • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 9, students write an essay answering the prompt: “Write an informational essay in which you explain how racism has impacted the lives of young Asian Americans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

The materials do not offer accommodations for the assessments. The assessments are not designed so students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. To make the tests more accessible, such as text-to-speech or increasing the font size, teachers must download and edit the assessments. 

Materials do not offer accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text-to-speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Assessments are digital and housed on the website. Although assessments could be altered before printing, it would involve reformatting the answers.

Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

03/06

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

The grade 7 materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. While the materials include suggestions on how materials can be scaffolded for multi-lingual learners or for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, these suggestions are general and leave the implementation and development of these scaffolds to the teacher. The materials do include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. 

Throughout the program, there is limited variation in structure. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. In addition, there are opportunities provided for grouping students, but the groupings do not vary in type and take place at the same part of each lesson. 

The materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts.

Indicator 3M
01/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3m. 

The materials include general supports throughout the program for all students; however, the materials do not share specifically which supports would benefit or target specific special populations. Materials include instances that provide opportunities for enrichment which “can be used with advanced students or students who have demonstrated readiness for enrichment as a way of exploring texts, topics, and more complex concepts in depth.” The Additional Supports section should assist students when working with grade-level content to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy; however, teachers will need to determine which supports to utilize specifically for special populations.

Materials provide limited strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Summary consistently provides a general statement: “In order to ensure that all students are able to access the texts and tasks in this unit, it is incredibly important to intellectually prepare to teach the unit prior to launching the unit. Use the intellectual preparation protocol and the Unit Launch to determine which support students will need. To learn more, visit the Supporting all Students teacher tool.”

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 9, the Close Read section of the Enhanced Lesson plan includes support for teachers to use such as Language Supports that use the following sentence stem: “This experience challenges Akhtar al-Sinjari’s perspective of herself because ________.” Guidance directs the teacher to drop in the meaning of specific vocabulary words, such as Souk, devout, and Halal, if needed. Another Supporting All Students section gives further indication for Foundational Skills Support to “help students access the fluency or language demands of the text” and Language Supports to “help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences.”

  • In Unit 3, Abusing Power: Animal Farm and Wicked History, Lesson 6, the materials provide a Supporting All Students section that includes a question mark icon that populates the following guidance when clicked: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the demands of the text or the task. See Supporting All Students with Fishtank ELA for more guidance.” An example of general support includes sentence stems to assist with the task of identifying two examples of Stalin using the technique of glittering generalities in Joseph Stalin (A Wicked History) by Sean McCollum “‘Glittering generalities’ is ____________. Stalin used ‘glittering generalities’ because ___________.” The supports do not provide additional guidance for teachers to make decisions.

  • The Supporting All Students teacher tool provides general support scaffolds for supporting English language learners; however, these scaffolds are broad and not specific to any lesson or text. 

Indicator 3N
01/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n. 

The materials include some opportunities for students to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level; however, many of these opportunities require students to complete more assignments than their classmates. The number of lessons that contain an “Opportunities for Enrichment” section is limited. Some of the lessons provide specific scaffolds intended to enhance lessons by providing additional depth through many activities for students, such as reading an extra text or portion of a text or completing an additional assignment for the text. 

Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, 14 of 22 lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:

    • In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include: Ask students to think about the sentence on the top of page 70: ‘The shirtwaist became a symbol of women’s liberation.’ Was this true for all women? How did women’s fashion for wealthy women influence the lives of poor women?”

    • In Lesson 5, enrichment opportunities include: Ask students to find examples of foreshadowing; there are a number of references to fires and fire escapes in this chapter!”

    • In Lesson 15, enrichment opportunities include: It would be possible to spend an entire class period unpacking the middle paragraph on page 198! You may want to use this as a ‘juicy sentence’ passage.”

    • In Lesson 17, enrichment opportunities include: One thing that Haddix does throughout this book is to foreshadow the fire that we know is coming. Where in this chapter (or anywhere else in the text) do we see examples of foreshadowing the fire?”

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American-Born Chinese, eight of twenty-one lessons contain specific supports for enrichment that could be used for advanced students.

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, multiple lessons include enrichment opportunities. For example:

    • In Lesson 2, enrichment opportunities include: To modify this lesson into a multiday project, consider having students use the timelines from yesterday’s lesson to select a significant event and perform their own research, or assign topics and have students find at least one additional source that they will use when creating their posters.”

    • In Lesson 4, enrichment opportunities include: Have students consider the ways in which things that happen in their school reinforce the gender binary.”

    • In Lesson 8, enrichment opportunities include: Ask: Discuss why Slater most likely chose to write the chapter ‘Booked In’ in the second person.”

    • In Lesson 10, enrichment opportunities include: Ask: Do you think that the presence of Richard’s gay cousin is relevant or sufficient ‘evidence’ that Richard is not homophobic?”

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

The materials provide some variety in how students demonstrate understanding. Students have many opportunities during lessons to express their understanding and respond to literature, but the opportunities are not varied. The non-writing day Enhanced Lesson Plans follow the same format for each lesson. Students regularly respond in the same ways. Each lesson begins with a Close Read, during which students read the assigned text and answer Close Reading Questions. Students answer questions orally by annotating the text, writing in the margins, or writing their answers. The Target Task Writing Prompt that follows requires students to write an answer using textual evidence to support ideas. The teacher provides feedback for a few examples, and students revise their work based on the feedback. Students participate in a class discussion focused on a given question. Students have one minute to jot down ideas, and two minutes to discuss in pairs or groups, before participating in a class discussion. Students complete an exit ticket to close the lesson. The repetitive nature of the lesson plan creates a system in which students repeatedly respond in the same manner to prompts. 

Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a limited variety of formats and methods. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 13, students respond to a prompt with a quick write to establish background. They then engage in a partner discussion to reflect on their answer and to establish an understanding. 

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, the Teacher Notes state, “Ask students to Quick-Write and/or Turn and Talk: Where and how do we learn stereotypes? How do we combat stereotypes? Explain to students that today they are going to talk about stereotypes about Asian people in media. “Media” means movies, television, comics, music, newspapers, art, books, etc.

Students have opportunities to share their thinking, to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time, and to apply their understanding in new contexts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 4 students engage in a discussion where they express their thoughts on the question, “Based on our reading today, how do you think the factory and sweatshop owners viewed their employees?” Students use textual evidence to support their thinking. In Lesson 13, during class discussion, students answer, “Share your opinion: Do you agree with the idea that ‘you can’t expect to change the world in a few short months’ and that small gains should be celebrated? Do you agree more closely with Rahel’s feelings about the end of the strike or Yetta’s?” In Lesson 14, student directions state: “Pretend you have been asked to explain the strike to someone who has never heard of it. Talk with a partner and summarize the most important things a person should know about the 1909-1910 garment workers’ strike (the historical facts). Discuss as a class what information is essential for understanding this strike.” In Lesson 15, students read and answer questions from “Page 206, Jane tells Bella and Yetta, ‘Everything I have was bought with blood.’ What does she mean by this figurative language? How does this show that Jane’s perspective of her own life has changed? What caused this change in her perspective? Carefully explain your thinking and provide evidence from page 196-197 to support your answers.” In Lesson 19, during a class discussion, students answer the question, “What emotional impact has reading about the fire had on you? You knew from the beginning of this unit that a fire was going to happen—what parts surprised you? Was it likely what you had expected?”

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 9, students answer the question, “How did you feel while reading the story ‘Geraldo No Last Name’? What is Cisneros suggesting about the experience of some undocumented immigrants in this country?”

Materials leverage the use of included formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 19, students answer Close Read questions to deepen their understanding of the text. 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 8, students complete Target Task where they jot down ideas, partner discuss, and engage in a whole class discussion focused on the question, “How and why is Walter’s view of what is important in life different from his mother’s? How does Hansberry develop their difference in perspective?”

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, Lesson 4, students answer a Writing Prompt: “What idea does Cisneros communicate about the experience of growing up in these two vignettes, and how does her use of structure help to communicate her message? Provide at least two pieces of evidence—one from each vignette—and carefully explain your thinking.”

Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:  

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 1, after students answer the Writing Prompt, the teacher provides two examples of answers—one that meets expectations and one that does not. The teacher provides feedback, and then students have an opportunity to revise their answers. 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 29, after participating in a Socratic Seminar, students “[s]elf-reflect at the conclusion of the lesson (or after each question).” Students use a reflection template that best fits the goals of the discussion. Materials provide the following documents: Self Reflection, Peer Feedback, and Whole-class reflection.

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 16, after students answer the Writing Prompt, the teacher provides two examples of answers—one that meets expectations and one that does not. The teacher provides feedback, and then students have an opportunity to revise their answers. 

Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, Lesson 18, the Teacher Notes state, “Discuss the features of a strong personal narrative with students. Ask students to discuss the specific incidents that Gene Yang writes about that they found to be the most surprising, interesting, and impactful or that they related to strongly. Why were these specific pages so memorable? Students should begin to brainstorm stories/incidents from their own lives that they may want to write about. Remember, these should be incidents that have some emotional charge for them, whether it is happy, sad, or even confusing. They should brainstorm at least three possible options. Have students briefly describe these three options with a partner. Their partner should give feedback about which incident/story to select.”

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

While materials provide opportunities for grouping students, the groupings do not vary in type and groupings take place in the same part of each lesson. Students do not have multiple opportunities to work in varied groups or different types of groupings. Materials do not provide specific guidance that explains how teachers should form groups or how teachers should incorporate protocols when grouping students. Materials also miss opportunities to provide suggestions for additional times when groupings could be used.

Materials provide grouping strategies for students. Materials provide limited types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, Lesson 15, students create posters in groups and “hang their posters around the room and complete a gallery walk. Give students post-it notes to comment on other posters, providing feedback on the way that the other groups have presented information.” 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, Lesson 12, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion. 

  • In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, Lesson 19, students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion. 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ + Experiences in the United States, Lesson 4,  students answer the class discussion question before engaging in a two-minute discussion, “making sure that each student gets the opportunity to share their thoughts” before engaging in a whole group discussion. 

Materials provide guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, Monitoring and Supporting Academic Discourse, the Providing Support During Discourse section provides some guidance for the teacher “to ensure that all students are able to effectively participate in academic discourse, provide the whole-class, small-groups, or individual students with the following supports—Strategically group students. If your class has a large number of English learners, group students who speak the same home language together. Allow them to complete the assignment in either English or in their own home language.”

  • In Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Preparing for Academic Discourse section poses this question for teachers to consider: “What vocabulary do students need to know and understand? Do I need to plan for Turn and Talks or small-group work to help students process the content?”

  • In the Teacher Support, ELA, Academic Discourse, the Types of Academic Discourse section includes information regarding the types of academic discourse provided in Fishtank ELA lessons: whole-class discussions, small-group discourse, and partner discourse. “The type of discourse students participate in will depend on the task and the goals of the lesson. There are many situations where all three types, or a combination of them, would be appropriate to use; however, each one brings some of its own unique values or benefits. When intellectually preparing to teach a lesson, you should think about where in the lesson you can include opportunities for different types of academic discourse.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Whole Class Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the Protocol for Fishbowl includes the following guidance: “The inner circle discusses a question while the outer circle observes. Note: This seminar structure is most effective if students in the outer circle are given a specific task—often to observe an assigned member of the inner circle and track that person’s arguments and general participation in order to give feedback. Otherwise, it can be challenging to keep students in the outer circle engaged. Rotate so that each group of students engages in discussion and observation.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Small Group Discussion to help set students up for success. For example, the protocol for Numbered Heads Together includes the following guidance: “Numbered Heads Together holds all members of a group accountable for participating and clarifying understanding of a particular question or topic. Numbered Heads Together can be used with any discussion prompt, however, questions with multiple answers or nuanced answers lead to a more engaging discussion.”

    • Materials provide protocols for Partner Conversation and “provide all students with a scaffolded and structured opportunity to formulate and share ideas. Partner conversations are low-risk and allow all students a chance to participate in the lesson at the same time.”

  • While materials provide this guidance in Teacher Support, the lesson plans do not adequately reference this guidance. 

Indicator 3Q
01/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 7 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3q. 

The materials provide some language supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English; however, materials miss opportunities to label specific protocols for these learners. The included language supports provide support with meaning, context, and understanding. These supports are also helpful to students who speak, write, and/or speak languages other than English with accessing the text or responding to the text. Materials provide additional supports in Teacher Tools that provide general guidance in preparing lessons for multilingual learners; however, they are not lesson specific, are broad in application, and would require teachers to prepare materials for specific lessons within the curriculum.

Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Supporting All Students, the materials provide a question mark next to Language Support, which indicates the following: “These supports can be used to help Multi-Lingual Learners and students with learning differences access the language demands of the text and the task. See the Supporting English Learners Teacher Tool for additional guidance.”

  • In Unit 1, Defining America: Poems, Essays, and Short Stories, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners.

  •  In Unit 3, Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners. 

  •  In Unit 5, Exploring Identity: American-Born Chinese, materials do not include lessons that specifically provide support for multilingual learners.

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include multiple folders providing guidance for teaching multilingual learners. They include guidance on providing scaffolds that are divided into areas of light support and heavier support. Suggestions include providing illustrations, images, photos, providing videos, films, or audio to support a lesson, using real-life or physical objects, text clues, various graphic scaffolds, and interactive scaffolds, including pairing and working with the student’s home language, and increasing supplemental texts and noticing cognates. These are explained and provided as general guidelines and are not lesson specific. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide suggestions on preparing lessons with multilingual learners in mind, including unpacking the units and texts with a look to analyzing language demands, knowing the language and content goals of the unit, planning for assessment and mastery, and taking ownership of teaching the unit with multilingual learners in mind. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on Engineering the Text that provides guidance on how to physically alter a text to make it more accessible to multilingual learners, including adding questions, proving genre tips, defining vocabulary, explaining key background knowledge, adding illustrations and headings, and including stop and jot questions. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials include a document on using oral language supports with multilingual learners. These include the use of various groupings to assist with comprehension and expressing ideas. 

  • In Teacher Tools, materials provide teachers with general scaffolds for multilingual learners. These include: 

    • In the Sensory scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Light EL Support and Heavier EL support. For example, in illustrations, images, and photos light supports suggested are: “Add illustrations to literature texts that do not include illustrations. Illustrations could be used to break up long sections of text or to clarify tricky plot events.” Heavier supports include: “Strategically engineer the text to include illustrations that align with specific features of text complexity. Multiple illustrations could be added to make the text easier to digest. (For example, when reading the Brer Rabbit folktales about the well, include an illustration of a well.)

    • In Interactive Scaffolds, materials include a list of scaffolds for Pairs, Small Groups, Discussion, Cooperative Structures, and Home Language. For example, in Home Language, materials state: “For lighter EL support: Have students use translanguaging by using some words and phrases from their home language when discussing or writing about content. For heavier EL support: Have students have entire conversations in their home language or have students write answers in their home language. Provide additional instruction on a particular concept or idea in students’ home language. Provide students with texts and problems written in their home language. Have students write an answer in their home language. Then have students transfer their answers to English.”

    • In Additional Supports, materials provide the teacher with suggestions for “Supplemental Text” support and “Noticing Cognates.” In the “Noticing Cognates” support, materials provide the following: “For lighter EL support: Teach students strategies for identifying cognates and have students self-identify and interpret examples of cognates in texts and tasks. For heavier EL support: Before reading a text, find examples of cognates and have students break them down. Focus on the meaning and intonation of the words. Teach students Greek and Latin roots that are cognates in English and Spanish. Have students create cognate reference guides.”

  • In Oral Language Protocols, materials provide the teacher with protocols for the following: Turn and Talk, Think-Pair Share, Write-Pair Share, Timed-Pair-Share, Think-Pair-Share Revised, Partner A Partner B. An example of the “Think-Pair-Share Revised protocol states: “Students are given a chance to refine their thinking and ideas based on their partner’s ideas and discussion. The teacher or student poses a question worthy of discussion. Teachers give students time to think about how they will answer. Students pair up. Students take turns sharing their answers. Students revise their original theories or ideas.”

  • In Engineering Texts, materials provide the teacher with a three-step guide to support planning. The explanation includes, “When you engineer a text, you add text supports to ensure all students have access. This does not mean changing the text or lowering the rigor of the task. An engineered text anticipates possible student misconceptions, gives vocabulary cues, provides additional background knowledge, scaffolds questions, and creates opportunities for discussion.”

  • In Graphic Organizer, for multilingual learner support, materials provide the teacher with “suggestions on how to adjust the organizers to provide light or heavy EL support.” Some examples include: 

    • Adjusting graphic organizers to provide light EL support: 

      • Provide blank templates for students to use when reading a text, brainstorming, or solving problems. 

    • Adjusting graphic organizers to provide heavy EL support: 

      • Provide students with partially filled-out graphic organizers. 

      • Provide guidance on where in the text, resources, or problem students can find a particular answer. (For example, if students are looking to describe a character, provide specific paragraph numbers where students can find key evidence.) 

      • Have students work in partners using an oral language protocol. 

      • If applicable, allow students to complete the graphic organizer in their home language. 

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

The Grade 7 materials include characters from different genders, races, ethnicities, and with other physical characteristics in the texts. The publishers state in the overview that they “seek to create curricular materials that center students, reflect multiple perspectives and experiences, and empower students to think critically about the world they live in.” The texts hold true to that standard as they contain characters from a broad spectrum of society. 

Materials and assessments depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Depictions of demographics or physical characteristics are portrayed positively across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, Defining America, students read multiple texts about diverse immigrant groups who have settled in the United States. The texts include accounts of immigrants from Europe, Central America, Asia, and Africa and include many first-hand accounts from immigrants. 

  • In Unit 2, Fighting Injustice: Uprising & Flesh and Blood So Cheap, the core text, Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix, is a story told from different points of view and includes characters from different backgrounds: Bella (an immigrant from Italy,) Yetta (an immigrant from Russia,) and Jane (daughter of a businessman.) 

  • In Unit 3: Pursuing Dreams: A Raisin in the Sun, students read the core text, A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, and supplemental texts to investigate the issues of segregation and discrimination. The unit features multiple discussions on race and whether all people have equal access to opportunity in the United States.

  • In Unit 4, Finding Home: The House on Mango Street, the images in the core text, The House on Mango Street, are of the author Sandra Cisneros, a Latinx woman. The supplemental materials provide various images of children and adults, all of varied skin types. Materials include interviews with people of different cultures from around the world.

Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5: Exploring Identity: American Born Chinese, students read the core text, American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang, that uses satire to combat racial stereotypes of Chinese Americans. 

  • In Unit 6, Claiming Our Place: LGBTQ+ Experiences in the United States, the core text is about Sasha (white teen) and Richard (black teen.) The text requires an understanding of the criminal justice system. Students read additional texts about LGBTQ issues and explore race, class, gender, and criminal justice.

Materials provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

The Teacher Tools provide some suggestions that scaffolds can be provided for students in their home language and that student conversations can be held in their home language. These suggestions are very general and leave the implementation and development of the specific scaffolds to the teacher. Materials include suggestions that teachers should consider students’ backgrounds when preparing a lesson, but materials do not provide specifics on how this should be done. The lesson plans include some scaffolds for multilingual learners but do not specifically address ways to use the home language to support learners that are lesson-specific. The Teacher Support section includes general guidance for supporting multilingual learners that relates to leveraging students’ home language through the use of translanguaging strategies.

Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, materials include a suggestion that when possible, teachers should show video adaptations of text in either English or the student’s native language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, when discussing creating graphs and charts to aid students in comprehending the text, materials include a provision to create the aids in the student’s home language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, Scaffolds for English Learners, Interactive Scaffolds, materials include provisions for incorporating the use of the student’s home language in discussions. Levels of support for students vary from translating phrases or words to allowing students to have complete conversations in their home language. 

  • In Teacher Tools, the Planning for English Learners section provides teachers with a step-by-step guide of questions to intellectually prepare the unit. In Step One, the teacher unpacks the unit texts and tasks. Directions state, “Teachers should analyze the text, materials, vocabulary, unit focus areas, and lessons to determine the language demands of the unit. Questions include: What makes the text and tasks linguistically complex? What key vocabulary do students need to know and understand to engage with discipline-specific knowledge? What key language use(s) are targeted in the unit? How are students developing their understanding and production of all the key uses of language? (recount, explain, argue, discuss)” In Step Two, the teacher sets a vision for mastery. Directions state, “​​Teachers should articulate the language and content goals of the unit. What are the driving language demands of the unit? What language should you see and hear from students as they engage in meaning-making? Based on the language demands of the unit, what are the overall language goals for the unit? What are the content goals for the unit? What should students know and understand about reading, writing, and language? What should students know and understand about the themes/subjects of the unit?” In Step Three, teachers plan for assessment and mastery. In Step Four, teachers take ownership. 

  • In Teacher Tools, English Learners, the Engineering Texts support provides teachers with a sample text. The example includes the following statements: “Let’s look at a before and after from a 5th-grade assignment from Science and Social Studies Unit 4: Exploring Mars, Lesson 19. In this lesson, students are reading a NASA press release for the first time. Here’s the original text, without text engineering, a press release from NASA: Mars Rovers Advance Understanding of the Red Planet As you can see, the text is complex for many reasons: Students may not be familiar with what a press release is, and the formal language used in a press release. Students may not have a strong grasp on knowledge from the unit so far, making it hard for them to understand key ideas from the press release. Students may not have a strong understanding of domain-specific vocabulary. Now, take a look at our Engineered Text Sample. This sample includes our meta-analysis of the purpose of each addition.”

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, the materials include general guidance to use translanguaging strategies. Students can annotate and take notes in their home language and research in their home language.

Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

The materials include a support section in Teacher Tools that provides teachers with suggestions and methods for preparing lessons for multilingual learners. Materials provide multiple suggestions on how the lessons can be scaffolded for multilingual learners. These suggestions are general in nature and are not lesson-specific, leaving any scaffolding for lessons to be developed by the teacher. The Teacher Tool for Planning for English Learners provides further guidance that tells teachers to consider any connection between a lesson and students’ cultural backgrounds but the resource does not provide any specific guidance on how this should be done. Teachers must investigate and implement strategies on their own. Individual lessons include very limited scaffolding for multilingual learners, and none include connections to linguistics, culture, or conventions used in learning ELA. Suggested scaffolds include audio or visual representations of the text when available.

Materials make limited connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make limited connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Scaffolds for English Learners, the Additional Scaffolds section includes guidance on noticing cognates. Supports range from identifying and interpreting examples of cognates, teaching Greek and Latin roots, and creating cognate reference guides.  

Materials include limited teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, during Step Four: Take Ownership of Planning for English Learners, guidance advises teachers to plan how they will consider students’ backgrounds when teaching a text. Suggestions include considering if connections can be made to students’ cultural traditions and considering what sociocultural context is relevant to the unit. 

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two includes planning for how students’ backgrounds will connect to the lesson, including planning for any language demands that will need to be met. 

Materials include limited equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Planning for English Learners, Intellectually Preparing a Lesson, Step Two states, “Ensure accessibility: What supports will students with higher language proficiency need to access and understand the content? What scaffolds (sensory, graphic, or interactive) are needed?” The guidance also asks educators to consider medium and lower language proficiency needs.

Materials include limited opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages, such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Teacher Tools, Supporting English Learners, Leveraging Students’ Home Language, materials provide limited guidance on incorporating students’ holistic and cultural identities into the classroom, including learning about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds, inviting family or community members into the classroom, choosing materials that authentically represent students’ language and culture, and using intellectual preparation to plan for including students’ cultural identifies..

Materials include prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

Read

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

The grade 7 materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Because the materials for students are printed, teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. 

Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

The materials do not include digital technology or interactive tools for students to interact with. Although the teacher materials are presented in a digital manner, student materials are printed materials. Teachers can access “ready-made slides and handouts which [they] can edit, download, print, or send to Google Classroom.” Students complete two digital presentations across the units. Materials do not include specific provisions for students to use digital technology in research or composing writing assignments. Materials do not include interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level standards. The digital platform is intended for teacher use. 

Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools, are not available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

The materials do not include digital technology. The materials do not include any specific opportunities or guidelines for students and/or teachers to collaborate with each other. The materials do require students to write and collaborate on their editing, but there is no provision to do this digitally. Materials do not provide opportunities for students to complete activities digitally. Materials do not provide specific guidance requiring students to collaborate digitally with peers or teachers.

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Student materials do not include images or graphics. The assessments and text-based student materials are easily read, and the structure is easily accessible to students. Materials are provided in one format with a visual design that supports learning. The design is not distracting or chaotic, and it neither adds to nor distracts from the subject matter. Materials include PDF documents that are organized in an accessible way. Materials provide graphic organizers when needed to help students with organization. The use of typography, layout, and space is visually appealing, though there is little variance in color and no engaging images.

Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Student materials do not include images, graphics, or models. 

Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The vocabulary pages and task pages that can be created for students are consistent and maintain the same layout. The information is easily identifiable and supports student understanding of the materials. 

  • Throughout the curriculum, the teacher’s directions are consistent. Materials provide a PDF version of each lesson and a PDF of the Target Task and Exit Ticket. 

Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Student materials do not include organizational features. 

  • Each unit includes a lesson map. The layout is consistent across the curriculum.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.

The materials do not include embedded technology. Although teacher materials are digital, the use of technology is limited, and teacher guidance on incorporating technology is limited. Materials do not provide specific lessons that incorporate teaching students how to use technology properly. Although materials include some general suggestions, such as instructing teachers that they should tell students to be certain that the resources they use are reliable, materials do not provide specifics on how to accomplish that task. Rather, teachers would have to develop guidelines and protocols for the use of technology independently. 

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found