About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Envision 2.0 | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for K-2 do not meet the expectation for alignment to the CCSSM. K-2 materials spend sufficient time on major work but do not meet expectations for coherence, scoring partial in Gateway 1. Grades K-2 were reviewed for rigor and mathematical practices in Gateway 2 and did not meet expectations.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed for 3-5 do not meet the expectation for alignment to the CCSSM. Third grade materials spend sufficient time on major work but do not meet expectations for coherence, scoring partial in Gateway 1. Grades 4 and 5 did not meet expectations for focus and coherence. Grade 3 was reviewed for rigor and mathematical practices in Gateway 2 and did not meet expectations.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 4th Grade
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 did not meet the expectations for alignment to the CCSSM. The instructional materials did not meet the expectations for Gateway 1 and therefore were not reviewed for Gateway 2.
4th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Focus & Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 enVision Math 2.0 did not meet the expectations for Gateway 1. The materials meet the expectations for focusing on the major work of the grade, but they do not meet the expectations for assessment and coherence. Some strengths were found and noted in the coherence criterion as the instructional materials partially met some of the expectations for coherence. Overall, the instructional materials allocate enough time to the major work of Grade 4, but the materials do not appropriately focus on assessment nor always meet the full depth of the standards.
Gateway 1
v1.0
Criterion 1.1: Focus
The instructional material reviewed for Grade 4 do not meet the expectations for focus within assessment. Overall, above grade-level content, including statistical distributions, was included on assessments.
Indicator 1A
The assessment materials reviewed for Grade 4 do not meet expectations for focus within assessment. There are many lessons in the materials that would need to be modified or omitted because of their alignment to above grade-level standards.
The series is divided into topics, and each topic has a topic assessment and a topic performance assessment. Additional assessments include a placement test found in Topic 1, four cumulative/benchmark assessments, and a End-of-Year Assessment.
The assessments that have items that assess future grade-level standards are listed below.
- Topic 5, item 13 has students using a procedure for division with no ties to place value. The directions for the students are "Use an algorithm to find a quotient." This is more closely aligned to 6.NS.B.
- Topic 9, item 6 has addition/subtraction with unlike denominators which would be a Grade 5 alignment; however, students are asked to use their knowledge of benchmark fractions to answer this item.
- Topic 10 questions 1A and 1B and Assessment Master questions 1A and 1B require students to simplify their answer from a fraction greater than one to a mixed number (5.NF.3). On page 584, in questions 5 and 6 students are multiplying whole numbers and mixed numbers. 4.NF.B includes multiplying fraction by a whole number. In Grade 5, 5.NF.B requires multiplication of a fraction by a mixed number.
- Statistical distributions are assessed and do appear in the Grade 4 materials. Topic 11, item 9a assesses if the data has an outlier; this assesses 6.SP.5c giving quantitative measures of center (median and/or mean) and variability (interquartile range and/or mean absolute deviation), as well as describing any overall pattern and any striking deviations from the overall pattern with reference to the context in which the data were gathered. A closer examination of the instruction related to this item revealed the following work on statistics which distract from focus. The following pages include instruction on outliers which demonstrates the prolific amount of off grade-level work and how removing it would heavily modify the materials.
- Page 587A: "Ask questions about the data set such as: Is there an outlier?"
- Page 588-590: My Word Cards.
- Page 591A: Vocabulary.
- Page 591A in the ELL section: "Display 'outlier' and ask students to read it out loud. Underline 'out.' You know the word 'out,' as in outside. An outlier is a number that is far away from, or outside of, the other numbers in a data set."
- Page 592: mentions the word outlier 11 times.
- Page 597: "MP6 Be Precise Listen and look for students who use a line plot to find outliers in a data set about pets." "A line plot can help you find an outlier in a data set." "What is an outlier?"
- Outlier is used in direct instruction, activities, students pages, intervention, reteaching, and homework on the following pages: 587A, 587D, 581I, 587E, 588-590, 591A, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 597A, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 616, 617 and 618.
Note:
- There are many items that require a particular strategy (bar model, array, compensation, etc.), especially in Topics 1-5.
- Topic 3 page 161, question 5 part B: Only one lesson discusses the distributive property and uses an area model (lesson 3-3), and this question specifically calls for drawing an area model to answer the question.
- Topic 4, item 9 and Topic 14, item 2, do not require the students to do any mathematics.
Criterion 1.2: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the expectations for focus on the major clusters of each grade. Students and teachers using the materials as designated will devote the majority of class time to major clusters of the grade.
Indicator 1B
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 meet the expectations for focus within major clusters. Overall, the instructional materials spend the majority of class time on the major clusters of each grade.
To determine this, three perspectives were evaluated: 1) the number of topics devoted to major work, 2) the number of lessons devoted to major work, and 3) the number of days devoted to major work. The number of days is the same as the number of lessons. A lesson level analysis is more representative of the instructional materials than a topic level analysis because the number of lessons within each topic is inconsistent, and we drew our conclusion based on that data.
Grade 4 enVision Math 2.0 includes 16 Topics with 109 lessons. At the topic level ten of the 16 focus on major work. Two of the 16 topics focus on supporting work and are supporting the major work of the grade, and four of the 16 topics focus on supporting work without supporting the major work. At the topic level approximately 75 percent of the topics are focused on major work.
As mentioned above, a lesson level analysis is more representative of the instructional materials than a topic level analysis because the number of lessons within each topic is inconsistent. At the lesson level 69 lessons focus on major work, 13 lessons focus on supporting work and support the major work of the grade, 18 lessons focus on the supporting work without supporting the major work, and 9 lessons focus on off grade level topics. Approximately 16 percent of the lessons focus on supporting work and do not support the major work of the grade, and approximately 8 percent of the lessons focus on off grade-level topics. At the lesson level approximately 63 percent of the lessons focus on major work. Supporting work which continues major work learning was included, bringing this up to 75 percent.
Criterion 1.3: Coherence
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 do not meet the expectations for being coherent and consistent with CCSSM. The instructional materials do not have enough materials to be viable for a school year and do not always meet the depth of the standards. The majority of the instructional materials do not have supporting content enhancing focus and coherence simultaneously but do have objectives which are clearly shaped by the CCSSM. Overall, the instructional materials for Grade 4 do not exhibit enough characteristics of coherence.
Indicator 1C
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet expectations that supporting content enhances focus and coherence by engaging students in the major work of the grade. Some of the supporting work is treated separately and does not support the major work of the grade, and many natural connections are missed.
The following detail supporting work in the instructional materials.
- Topic 7 is focused on factors and multiples and somewhat supports the major work of the grade. The connections to the major work are weak. If this topic was earlier in the materials the connections would be stronger since the connections are one-digit by one-digit or one-digit by two-digit multiplication. However, no instruction in Topic 7 is explicitly tied to multiplication/division strategies (e.g., splitting a number into factors, using associative property to rearrange); connections to creating common factors is mentioned in the teacher guide but not tied to instruction in this topic.
- Topic 13 is focused on conversion of measurements 4.MD.A and does support the major work of the grade. Lesson 13-1, Lesson 13-2, Lesson 13.3 and Lesson 13.6 connect measurement standards to operations with fractions (4.NF).
- Topic 14 is focused on generating and analyzing patterns 4.OA.C. This topic is treated separately and does not support the major work of the grade.
- Topic 15 is focused on angles and angle measurement, 4.G.A. This topic is treated separately and does not support the major work of the grade.
- Topic 16 is focused on lines, angles, and shapes (4.G.A). This lesson is treated separately from major work.
Indicator 1D
The amount of content designated for one grade level is not viable for one school year in order to foster coherence between grades. The pacing guide assumes one lesson per day as stated on page TP-23A. The enVison Math 2.0 Grade 4 program consists of 109 lessons, grouped in 16 topics. Assessments are not included in this count; if the 16 days of assessment are added in this would bring the count to 125 days. This is still below the standard school year of approximately 140-190 days of instruction. Significant modifications by the teacher would need to be made to the program materials to be viable for one school year.
Indicator 1E
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the expectations for being consistent with the progressions in the standards. Overall, the materials give students extensive work with grade-level problems and relate grade-level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades, but the materials do not reach the full depth of the standards and do not always clearly identify work that is off grade-level.
Material related to future grade-level content is not clearly identified or related to grade-level work. The exception is the topic titled "Step up to 5th grade" where the materials are clearly identified as Grade 5 materials. The Grade 4 materials have some instances where future grade-level content is present and not identified as such. For example:
- Lessons 3-7, 3-8, 3-9, and 4-10 align to using a procedure for multiplication, which is 5.NBT.5.
- Lessons 5-8 and 5-9 align to using a procedure for division, which is 6.NS.2.
- Lessons 11-1 and 11-2 have students finding the outlier in a set of data, which is 6.SP.5c.
The content does not always meet the full depth of the standards. This occurs due to a lack of lessons addressing the full depth of standards. For example:
- 4.OA.3, "Solve multistep word problems posed with whole numbers and having whole-number answers using the four operations, including problems in which remainders must be interpreted. Represent these problems using equations with a letter standing for the unknown quantity. Assess the reasonableness of answers using mental computation and estimation strategies including rounding" is the focus of three lessons. Within these three lessons (6-3, 6-4 and 6-5), some of the problems are one-step problems. A few other lessons do list 4.OA.3 as a supporting standard; however, they do not have multistep problems in the lessons.
- 4.NBT.5, "Multiply a whole number of up to four digits by a one-digit whole number, and multiply two two-digit numbers, using strategies based on place value and the properties of operations. Illustrate and explain the calculation by using equations, rectangular arrays, and/or area models" is the focus of three lessons. One of the lessons (3-1) teaches students to write zeros after the product of the first two numbers if you are multiplying by a power of 10. For example, for 3 x 50, you would multiply 3 x 5 and then add one zero to get the answer. There is no connection made to place value, which could lead to misconceptions later for students.
- 4.NF.2 is the focus of three lessons, and this standard encompasses the major work of comparing fractions with unlike numerators and unlike denominators.
- 4.NF.5 is mentioned in two lessons, and when further examining those lessons, the standard is not present in lesson 12-5 and is briefly mentioned in the examples in lesson 12-4.
The materials extensively work with grade-level problems, for example:
- All students complete grade-level materials, and suggestions for re-teaching and intervention are included with each lesson and at the end of each topic.
- Online resources include extra-, on-level and advanced-practice materials.
- A math and science project is available for each topic taught.
- Homework practice problems are identified in the teacher edition as intervention, on-level, and advanced.
- The numbers of topics focusing on Grade 4 domains are as follows: 5 out of 16 topics address number and operations in base ten; 4 out of 16 topics address number and operations - Fractions; 3 out of 16 topics address operations and algebraic thinking; 3 out of 16 topics address measurement and data; and 1 out of 16 topics address geometry.
The materials relate grade-level concepts to prior knowledge within the introduction of each topic, for example:
- "Math Background: Coherence" includes "Look Back" and "Look Ahead" commentary, connecting to mathematics that came earlier in Grade 4, explaining connections to the content within the topic, and explaining what will come later in Grades 4 and 5. An example can be found on pages 325c-325d for Topic 6.
- Individual lessons also include coherence headings. An example is in lesson 6-1 on page 327A that includes the heading, "Coherence: In Topic 2, students developed fluency in adding and subtracting whole numbers. In Topics 3 and 4, ... In this lesson, students use these skills to solve problems involving comparisons."
- In lesson 9.1, for 4.NF.B, students are extending their simple equivalent fraction knowledge to add fractions using models.
- In lesson 1.4, for 4.NBT.A, students are extending their knowledge of number lines to round whole numbers.
Indicator 1F
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 4 partially meet the expectations for fostering coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and required by the standards. Overall, the materials include learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings, but the materials lack problems and activities that connect two or more clusters in a domain or two more domains in the grade.
The materials are designed at the cluster level, and this design feature is represented throughout the material in the form of a color-coded wheel identifying the cluster focus of each unit. The materials include learning objectives which are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings, and the Topic Planner at the beginning of each topic has an example of this.
- The focus of Topic 2 is 4.NBT.B, Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform multi-digit arithmetic, and 4.OA.A, Use the four operations with whole numbers to solve problems. Lesson objectives in Topic 2 include: L4 - Use place value and an algorithm to subtract whole numbers and L6 - Use previously learned concepts and skills to reason abstractly and make sense of quantities and their relationships in problem situations.
- A similar example for Topic 15 can be found on pages 765I - 765J.
The materials for Grade 4 enVision Math 2.0 partially foster coherence through grade-level connections. Most lessons in the Grade 4 program focus within a single domain and cluster. Of 109 lessons, 70 lessons focus within a single cluster and domain.
- In Topic 1, 0 of the 5 lessons address standards within two or more clusters.
- In Topic 2, 4 of the 6 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 3, 4 of the 10 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 4, 8 of the 11 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 5, 4 of the 10 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 6, 5 of the 5 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 7, 1 of the 5 lessons address standards in two domains (4.OA and 4.NBT).
- In Topic 8, 0 of the 7 lessons address standards in two or more clusters.
- In Topic 9, 0 of the 11 lessons address standards in two or more clusters.
- Four of the 6 lessons within Topic 10 are within a single cluster and domain.
- Two of the 4 lessons within Topic 11 are within a single cluster and domain.
- In Topic 12, 3 of the 6 lessons address standards in two domains (4.NF and 4.MD).
- Two of the 7 lessons within Topic 13 are within a single cluster and domain.
- All of the 4 lessons within Topic 14 are within a single cluster and domain.
- Five of the 6 lessons within Topic 15 are within a single cluster and domain.
- In Topic 16, 0 of the 6 lessons address standards in two or more clusters.