Bookworms
2022

Bookworms

Publisher
Open Up Resources
Subject
ELA
Grades
K-5
Report Release
11/01/2022
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
Not Eligible
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
52/112

This score represents an average across grade levels reviewed for: integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, and promotion of mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Building Knowledge
90/144
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

Additional Publication Details

Title ISBN
International Standard Book Number
Edition Publisher Year
OUR BKWM 1Ed G2-5 Tchr Manual 9781638423423
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr Shd Rd M1 9781638423515
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr Shd Rd M3 9781638423539
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr Shd Rd M4 9781638423546
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr ELA M1 9781638423553
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr ELA M2 9781638423560
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr ELA M3 9781638423577
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Tchr ELA M4 9781638423584
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Sdnt Wkbk 4 9781638423829
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Sdnt Wkbk 2 9781643110288
OUR BKWM 1Ed G3 Sdnt Wkbk 3 9781953454584
CLOSE

About This Report

Report for 3rd Grade

Alignment Summary

The Bookworms Grade 3 materials partially meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include some instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.

3rd Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations
Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

The texts used in the Bookworms program are of high quality, are engaging and representative, and are of high interest to students. Students engage in a range and volume of reading of a variety of genres; however, materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the standards. The majority of texts are quantitatively appropriate for the grade level, but materials do not provide a text complexity analysis that addresses qualitative factors or associated reader and task considerations. During both the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, students have daily opportunities to engage in questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and/or text-dependent, though speaking and listening protocols for evidence-based discussions are limited. Materials provide multiple opportunities for both on-demand and process writing, and writing opportunities address narrative, informational, and opinion writing. Materials include opportunities for students to use authentic texts during their writing instruction, though grammar and usage skills are not always explicitly taught. Students experience vocabulary development within texts, though there is limited vocabulary development across texts. Throughout both the Shared Reading and Differentiated Instruction (DI) blocks, materials provide explicit instruction that addresses many grade-level phonological awareness and phonics standards, though some skills are only referenced and are not taught explicitly and systematically. The small group instruction format of the DI block does not ensure that all students receive explicit instruction that addresses all foundational skills and not all foundational skills are assessed according to the grade level Assessment Plan.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

11/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade.

Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

The Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include a wide variety of informational and literary texts that are high quality and worthy of students’ time and attention. Materials include full-length texts, many of which were written by award-winning authors. The texts include diverse representation and are written by a diverse set of authors, including a number of contemporary authors. Despite this, materials do not reflect the balance of literary and informational texts required by the standards. Anchor texts do, however, include a wide and diverse range of genres, including fantasy, autobiography, folktales, realistic fiction, and historical fiction. The majority of the texts that students chorally read, as well as the texts the teacher reads aloud have the appropriate level of text complexity for the grade. Although the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include Lexile levels and genres for each text, materials do not provide qualitative or associated task complexity information. While the qualitative complexity measure remains relatively the same in Shared Reading, the associated task measure increases in complexity; however, in the ELA Lesson Plans, the overall complexity decreases across the school year with most texts remaining qualitatively moderate. Students have opportunities to read and/or listen to a wide range of texts each day through shared reading, interactive reading, and self-selected reading experiences. Students read a number of texts across multiple lessons in each module; however, materials do not provide explicit guidance and support for teachers or students with regard to independent reading accountability or structure.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 1a.

The Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include a wide variety of informational and literary texts that are high quality and worthy of students’ time and attention. Materials include full-length texts, many of which were written by award-winning authors. The texts include diverse representation and are written by a diverse set of authors, including a number of contemporary authors. Many of the texts include rich vocabulary and address a range of topics that should be appealing and engaging to students.

Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, students read text to explore themes such as working hard to feel pride and how unexpected journeys can lead to a joyful experience.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, students choral read Red Kite, Blue Kite by Ji-li Jiang. This text tells the story of a relationship between a father and son during the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

  • In the Shared Reading Lessons, Module 3, students choral read Harvesting Hope: The Story of Cesar Chavez by Kathleen Krull. This award-winning book explains the conflict over justice between White and Hispanic Americans. Students can identify with the themes of justice and doing what is right in the face of challenges.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, students choral read The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane by Kate DiCamillo. This award-winning chapter book includes illustrations and themes of love, loss, humility, and pride.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, students listen to The BFG by Roald Dahl. Students can identify with the humor and fantasy aspects of the novel, as well as the themes of friendship and teamwork.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, students listen to _The Keeping Quilt _by Patricia Polacco. This text contains culturally specific vocabulary, rich illustrations, and symbolism.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, students listen to Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor. Students can identify with the topics of honesty and love of animals in this Newbery Award winning novel.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, students listen to One Hen by Katie Smith Milway. Students learn how the actions of one person can benefit and profit an entire community, while exploring the theme of actions and consequences.

Indicator 1B
02/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Materials reflect an uneven balance of literary and informational texts and include a heavier focus on informational texts. Of the Shared Reading and ELA texts students read, 63% of the texts are informational and 37% of the texts are literary. Although the balance of text types is uneven, students read a wide and diverse range of genres, including fantasy, autobiography, folktales, realistic fiction, and historical fiction. Students do not have opportunities to read or listen to legends, myths, and dramas, as required by the standards.   

Materials mostly reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Students read realistic fiction texts, such as Owen Foote, Money Man by Stephanie Greene, Fudge-A-Mania by Judy Blume in Shared Reading, Module 1, Unit 1 and Because of Winn Dixie by Kate DiCamillo in Shared Reading, Module 2, Unit 2.  

  • Students listen to fantasy texts, including The BFG by Roald Dahl in ELA, Module 1, Unit 2 and Pinduli by Janell Cannon in ELA, Module 4, Unit 1.

  • Students read nonfiction texts, such as The Constitution of the United States and The Congress of the United States, both by Christine Taylor-Butler, in Shared Reading, Module 1, Unit 2. 

  • Students read and listen to biographies, such as A Picture Book of Frederick Douglass by David A. Adler in Shared Reading, Module 3, Unit 1 and Grandfather’s Journey by Allen Say in ELA, Module 2, Unit 1. 

  •  Students read and listen to historical fiction texts, such as Red Kite, Blue Kite by Ji-li Jiang in Shared Reading, Module 2, Unit 2 and Here Lies the Librarian by Richard Peck in ELA, Module 4, Unit 2.   

Materials do not reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Of the 35 texts students read or listen to, 22 (63%) are informational texts and 13 (37%) are literary texts. 

  • In Module 1, students read or listen to six core texts, three (50%) of which are informational texts and three (50%) of which are literary texts.

  • In Module 2, students read or listen to 12 core texts, with eight (67%) being informational texts and four (37%) being literary texts. 

  • In Module 3, students read or listen to 10 core texts, nine (90%) of which are informational and one (10%) of which is literary.

  • In Module 4, students read or listen to seven core texts, with two (29%) being informational texts and five (71%) being literary texts.

Indicator 1C
02/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c. 

The majority of the texts that students chorally read, as well as the texts the teacher reads aloud have the appropriate level of text complexity for the grade. When the texts do not fall within the Lexile Stretch Band for the grade, the complexity of the qualitative and/or associated task measures make the text appropriate for the grade. Although the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include Lexile levels and genres for each text, materials do not provide qualitative or associated task complexity information. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual and the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans outline the rationale for the educational purpose and placement of the texts included in the program.

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 30, students choral read The Constitution of the United States by Christine Taylor-Butler, which has a Lexile level of 660 and falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The text has a qualitative complexity of moderate, as the text requires some discipline-specific content knowledge. The associated task is moderate. Students write in response to two opinion prompts and provide reasons to support their opinions. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 40, students choral read Because of Winn Dixie by Kate DiCamillo, which has a Lexile level of 670 and falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The text has a moderate qualitative complexity due to its multiple layers of meaning, a fairly simple structure, and conversational language. The associated task is challenging. Students write in response to a prompt in which they critique the author’s craft. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 15, students choral read The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane by Kate DiCamillo, which has a Lexile level of 700 and falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The text is qualitatively complex due to its multiple layers of meaning. The associated task is complex. Students write a book review about who should read the book and why. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 11, students listen to Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl, which has a Lexile level of 1020 and falls within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band, making it quantitatively appropriate as a read-aloud text. The text is qualitatively low due to its implied but easy to identify purpose. The complexity of the associated task is accessible. The teacher and students select one memory from the text and write a description of the selected memory. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 27, students listen to The Keeping Quilt by Patricia Polacco, which has a Lexile level of 830 and falls within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band, making it quantitatively appropriate as a read-aloud text. The text has a qualitative complexity of moderate, due to its implied purpose and organization. The associated task complexity is accessible. Students talk with a partner about items that represent important things or meaningful events that could be included in a class keeping quilt. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 40, students listen to Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, which has a Lexile level of 890 and falls within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band, making it quantitatively appropriate as a read-aloud text. The text has a moderate qualitative complexity rating due to its single complex theme and the use of largely contemporary familiar language. The associated task is moderate. As a class, the teacher and students write a thank-you letter to Judd Travers from Marty’s point of view. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 10, students listen to Pinduli by Janell Cannon, which has a Lexile level of 680 and falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band, making it quantitatively low as a read-aloud text. Although the qualitative complexity is low, the text does explore a complex theme and requires cultural knowledge. The associated task has an accessible complexity rating. The teacher and students respond to a prompt during which they write an opinion paragraph and include reasons to support their opinion. 

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The provided text complexity documentation is limited to Lexile levels. Materials do not provide qualitative or associated task complexity information. The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics on The Lexile Framework for Reading site.

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual includes a Choosing and Using Books section. Within this section of the manual, the Building A Culturally Responsive Text Collection and a Culturally-Sustaining Curriculum portion gives an overview of the changes the publisher made with regard to the texts included in the program: “We adopted a style guide in the curriculum to capitalize both Black  and White to represent the importance of racial identity and avoid the implication that white was the standard and Black an outlier. We adopted the  term multilingual to replace English language learner to celebrate home language as an asset.” Then, the manual explains grade-specific text selection changes or replacements. Rationales for text selection include choosing texts that fit the grade level themes, are engaging to students, and help build a more culturally responsive text collection. 

  • The Module Overview page for the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson plans explains how the selected unit texts work together. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, the Module Overview page contains the following information: “In Unit 2: Government for the People, students will read two nonfiction texts about the United States government. These two texts work together to introduce students to multiple informative text structures and to help students learn why it is beneficial to read more than one book on the same topic. They also demonstrate the idea that the same theme can be expressed across multiple texts with different topics.”

Indicator 1D
02/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d.

In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, the overall text complexity and the associated task measure generally increases throughout the year in order to support students’ literacy growth. In the beginning of the year, the Shared Reading quantitative complexity measure ranges from 490L–660L and ranges from 700L–850L by the end of the year. In the beginning of the year, the ELA quantitative complexity measure ranges from 720L–1020L and ranges from 650L–680L by the end of the year. While the qualitative complexity measure remains relatively the same in Shared Reading, the associated task measure increases in complexity; however, in the ELA Lesson Plans, the overall complexity decreases across the school year with most texts remaining qualitatively moderate. The associated task complexity measure remains accessible, as the teacher either models or co-constructs the written response with students. Supporting teacher resources include suggestions to build background knowledge, discussion prompts, and scripted language, though these supports are often repeated throughout grades, modules, and lessons without variances in support relative to the complexity of the texts. Texts often span multiple lessons, appear in multiple associated tasks, and are grouped with other selections to build content knowledge.

The complexity of anchor texts students read provide limited opportunities for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, not encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 490L–660L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to moderate and the associated task complexity measure ranges from accessible to moderate. The overall complexity ranges from moderate to complex. For example, students read Fudge-A-Mania by Judy Blume (490L). This text falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The qualitative complexity measure is moderate. The associated task complexity is accessible, as students write in response during which they infer how the main character’s feelings have changed and what they think the main character has learned.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 530L–850L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to medium and the associated task complexity measure ranges from moderate to challenging. For example, students read Twisters and Other Terrible Storms by Will Osborne and Mary Pope Osborne (740L). This text falls within the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band and has a low qualitative complexity rating. The associated task complexity is considered challenging, as students reflect on the five nonfiction texts they read and write in response to the following prompt: “Why is it important for authors of nonfiction, informational texts to do research before writing their own books about a topic?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 570L–830L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to moderate and the associated task complexity measure ranges from accessible to challenging. The overall text complexity ranges from moderate to highly complex. For example, students read And Then What Happened, Paul Revere? by Jean Fritz (830L), which is above the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The qualitative complexity measure is moderate. The associated task measure is moderate, as students write about the specific choices the author made to tell the story and how those choices made the story interesting.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 700L–850L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to moderate and the associated task complexity measure ranges from moderate to challenging. The overall complexity of texts ranges from moderate to highly complex. For example, students read The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer (850L), which falls above the Grades 2–3 Lexile Stretch Band. The qualitative complexity measure is moderate. The associated task complexity is challenging, as students compare the stories of a character from this text to a character from the ELA interactive read aloud One Hen by Katie Smith Milway.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, the quantitative complexity ranges from 720L–1020L. The qualitative complexity rating for most texts is low and the associated task complexity measure for all texts is accessible. The overall complexity of texts ranges from moderate to very complex. For example, students listen to Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl (1020L), which has an appropriate Lexile for a Grade 3 read aloud. The qualitative complexity measure is low. The associated task complexity measure is accessible, as the teacher can either model or work with students to co-construct a response to the Respond Together prompt.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from AD650L–970L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to medium and the associated task complexity measure for all texts is accessible. The overall complexity of texts ranges from accessible to very complex. For example, students listen to The Keeping Quilt by Patricia Polacco (830L), which has an appropriate Lexile level for a Grade 3 read aloud. The qualitative complexity measure is rated as moderate, and the associated task complexity is accessible, as the teacher can either model or work with students to co-construct a response to the Respond Together prompt.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 800L–920L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to moderate and the associated task complexity measure for all texts is accessible. The overall complexity of texts ranges from moderate to very complex. For example, students listen to Harvesting Hope: The Story of Cesar Chavez by Kathleen Krull (880L), which has an appropriate Lexile level for a Grade 3 read aloud. The qualitative complexity measure is moderate. The associated task level is accessible, as the teacher can either model or work with students to co-construct a response to the Respond Together prompt.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 650L–680L. The qualitative complexity measure for all texts is low and the associated task complexity measure for all texts is accessible. The overall complexity of texts is accessible. For example, students listen to Bringing the Rain to Kapiti Plain by Verna Aardema (NP). The qualitative complexity measure is low. The associated task complexity is accessible, as the teacher can either model or work with students to co-construct a response to the Respond Together prompt.

As texts become more complex, some scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons).

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, throughout the year, the teacher and students follow the same reading routine. This routine does not differ according to the complexity of the texts students read. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual outlines the Shared Reading routine: “The teacher sets a purpose for reading the day’s new text portion, and immediately everyone begins reading chorally. The teacher interrupts once (or sometimes twice) to model a comprehension strategy, but choral reading resumes very quickly. At the end of the day’s segment, the teacher takes one or two minutes to talk about the initial purpose for reading, and then sets a new one. With that new purpose, students reread in partners, either reading chorally again or taking turns, page by page. The teacher interrupts this partner reading when time is up, and they all discuss the second reading purpose, moving right away to a discussion that reviews and deepens understanding of the day’s reading. The teacher brings closure by updating an ongoing anchor chart, highlighting text content and text structure. Finally, the teacher assigns written work, typically word study practice and a text-based written response, to be completed during the Differentiation Block.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, throughout the year, the teacher and students follow the same reading routine. This routine does not differ according to the complexity of the interactive read-aloud texts students listen to. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual outlines the ELA routine. This instructional block consists of two routines: the interactive read aloud and writing. Materials suggest the teacher use a document camera to display the illustrations if possible. Additionally, materials include recommendations for the use of chart paper to display vocabulary terms for informational texts and to create anchor charts that highlight the content and structure of the read-aloud texts. The teacher and students may add to these anchor charts during each lesson.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, the Respond Together prompt can either be modeled by the teacher, co-constructed with students, or completed by students independently. Although the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual states that teachers can use the “extensive modeling language we have provided in writing instruction as a model for modeling,” materials do not provide modeled language for teachers to use.

Indicator 1E
01/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.

Students have opportunities to read and/or listen to a wide range of texts each day through shared reading, interactive reading, and self-selected reading experiences. Students read a number of texts across multiple lessons in each module; however, materials do not provide explicit guidance and support for teachers or students with regard to the independent reading in which students engage within a given lesson or unit or across the year. While materials include a pacing schedule for self- selected, gradual release, independent reading within the Differentiated Instruction block, this schedule does not hold students accountable for their independent reading. Rather, students complete a Book Recommendation chart to rate and recommend the book to classmates. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual notes time for students’ self-selected reading each day; however, materials do not provide explicit teacher guidance to support students with this instructional time beyond a Read and Rate chart for students to complete after they have finished reading a book.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Across the four Shared Reading and ELA modules, students choral read and/or listen to 35 texts from a variety of text types and genres. For example:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 7, students choral read an excerpt from Owen Foote, Money Man, a realistic fiction text by Stephanie Green.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 22, the teacher and class read an excerpt from the text And Then What Happened Paul Revere, a biography by Jean Fritz together.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, students listen to an excerpt of Boy: Tales of Childhood, a memoir by Roald Dahl.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 7, the teacher models reading aloud the realistic fiction text One Hen by Katie Smith Milway.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, this module contains two units and a total of 40 lessons. Throughout this module, students read a total of four texts. In Lesson 1, students read Owen Foote: Money Man by Stephanie Green over the course of 10 lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter in each lesson. In Lesson 11, students read Fudge-A-Mania by Judy Blume over the course of nine lessons. Students typically choral read one, sometimes two chapters each day. While materials do not provide lesson plans for Chapter 11, materials do provide teacher guidance relative to instructional decision making for this portion of the text. In Lesson 21, students read The Constitution of the United States by Christine Taylor-Butler over the course of 10 lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter or section in each lesson with one pause point for students to reread two chapters. In Lesson 31, students read The Congress of the United States by Christine Taylor-Butler over the course of 10 lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter or section in each lesson with one pause point for students to reread two chapters and an ending point for students to identify text features.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, this module contains two units and a total of 45 lessons. Throughout this module, students read a total of five texts. In Lesson 1, students read A Picture Book of Frederick Douglass by David Adler over a course of five lessons. Students typically choral read a few pages per lesson. In Lesson 6, students read Susan B Anthony: A Champion of Women’s Rights by Helen Albee Monsell over the course of 20 lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter per lesson. In Lesson 26, students read And Then What Happened, Paul Revere? by Jean Fritz, beginning with Chapter 2, over the course of five lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter per lesson, though not all chapters are read. In Lesson 31, students read Who is Sonia Sotomayor? by Megan Stine over the course of 10 lessons. Students typically choral read a chapter per lesson. In Lesson 41, students read The Story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Biography Book for New Readers by Susan B. Katz, over the course of five lessons. Students typically choral read one chapter per lesson.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2 contains three units and a total of 45 lessons. Throughout the module, students listen to a total of seven texts. In Lesson 1, the teacher reads aloud Maps and Globes by Jack Knowlton over the course of five lessons. Students initially listen to between 9–11 pages per lesson before tapering off to 5–7 pages per lesson. In Lesson 6, the teacher reads A Drop Around the World by Barbara Shaw McKinney over the course of three lessons. Students listen to five, seven, and nine pages, respectively. In Lesson 9, the teacher reads aloud What is a Biome? By Bobbie Kalman over the course of seven lessons. Students listen to a varying number of pages each lesson. In Lesson 26, the teacher reads aloud The Keeping Quilt by Patricia Polacco over the course of two lessons. Students typically listen to 13 pages each lesson. In Lesson 28, the teacher reads aloud Grandfather’s Journey by Allen Say over the course of two lessons. Students listen to 11 and 16 pages, respectively. In Lesson 33, the teacher reads aloud Lon Po Po: A Red-Riding Hood Story from China by Ed Young over the course of two lessons. Students typically listen to 14 pages per lesson. In Lesson 35, the teacher reads aloud American Tall Tales by Mary Pope Osborne over the course of six lessons. Students listen to a varying number of pages each lesson.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4 contains three units and a total of 40 lessons. Throughout the module, students listen to a total of three texts. In Lesson 1, the teacher reads aloud Bringing the Rain to Kapiti Plain by Verna Aardema over the course of three lessons. Students listen to varying numbers of pages in each lesson. In Lesson 4, the teacher reads aloud One Hen by Katie Smith Milway over the course of three lessons. Students typically listen to five pages per lesson. In Lesson 8, the teacher reads aloud Pinduli by Janell Cannon over the course of three lessons. Students typically listen to 15 pages per session.

There is insufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Understanding the Differentiated Instruction Block, Structures, materials include a sample rotation schedule, which includes 15 minutes of Self-Selected Reading each day. As part of the program’s gradual release model, students have the opportunity to read texts with teacher support, with teacher support waning to little or none over time. Once students finish a book, they can complete a Book Recommendation chart to rate their reading and recommend the text to other students. Students also have the option of completing a Read and Rate chart after they finish a book, though the materials indicate that this is “for teachers who want to meet with students to set independent reading goals,” so all students may not have the opportunity to benefit from this accountability structure.

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, materials indicate that the Differentiated block allows students to freely read a wide range of text at each grade level; additional teacher guidance on implementing independent reading is limited. The manual includes a list of books as a suggested classroom library.

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

12/16

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

Throughout the materials, students have frequent opportunities to engage in text-specific or text-dependent tasks and questions that often require students to provide textual evidence to support their responses and claims. Students engage in a range of activities, including written responses, class discussions, partner discussions, and co-creation of class anchor charts. While materials include evidence-based discussion opportunities, such as whole class discussions, partner work, reading and rereading together, and co-created writing pieces, materials do not provide protocols for these activities nor is there guidance for how or when teachers should model speaking and listening techniques. While materials include opportunities to support students’ speaking and listening about the texts students read and research, materials lack varied discussion strategies, guidance on how students should respond, and relevant follow-up questions and supports for teachers. Materials include on-demand writing tasks and process writing opportunities throughout the Shared Reading and ELA instructional blocks. Across the Shared Reading lessons, students have almost daily opportunities to write short responses to prompts about what they have read. Throughout the year, students receive explicit writing instruction and opportunities to write opinion, informative, and narrative pieces, and the materials provide frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing throughout the school year. Both the Shared Reading and ELA Lessons include opportunities to utilize texts as mentor texts or as curricular connections to aid students with using evidence to support their thinking. Materials include instruction of many grammar and language conventions standards; however, there are limited opportunities for application in- and out-of-context. An explicit scope and sequence is not provided. Materials include a cohesive year-long plan for students to interact with and build key vocabulary words in texts. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage with vocabulary words multiple times within a text, however, materials provide few instances of vocabulary words repeating across multiple texts.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f.

Throughout the materials, students have frequent opportunities to engage in text-specific or text-dependent tasks and questions that often require students to provide textual evidence to support their responses and claims. Students engage in a range of activities, including written responses, class discussions, partner discussions, and co-creation of class anchor charts. The lesson plans for both the ELA and Shared Reading Blocks contain Teaching Tips and Discussion Guides for teacher use when guiding these activities and understanding what to look for in students’ work.

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, students read Soil by Christin Ditchfield and discuss answers to questions, such as “What is the author telling us at the bottom of page 9 when the text says, ‘She looked at the expression on Lydia’s face. ‘Not that you ever think of it,’” she finished weakly." and “Why is there very little blood even after the hook comes out?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 22, students chorally read an excerpt from the text, then discuss the following questions as a class: “Why did the author choose this title for the chapter?” and “Why do you think it was hard to get the states to vote unanimously?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 8, students participate in a discussion of the following questions: “Why was Susan impatient about the cheese? What happened when Susan was being impatient? Why does Grandmother say that it is a sinful thing to be puffed up with pride? How does Grandfather give a compliment to Grandmother? Why didn’t Susan want to help her grandmother with the yarn?” With the class, the teacher also adds the following question to the anchor chart, “What is the most important event from this chapter?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 12, students discuss the following question after participating in an interactive read aloud: “This chapter ends with the sentence: ‘It was marvelous to be so popular.’ Do you think that this is going to end up good or bad? Why?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 7, students participate in a discussion of the question, “Marian feels that the color of her skin should not matter. And speaking of color, has anyone noticed anything unusual about the illustrations in this book?” Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, the provided guidance helps to ensure that “teachers have a model for inferential questioning, for modeling with language consistent with our Shared Reading modeling, and for marking especially important details in the text.” The teacher manual provides an example of the work. The lesson plans also provide guidance. The teacher manual also provides guidance on Shared Reading lessons and text annotations.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 3, the Teaching Tip indicates, “Students may know little of the struggle for women’s rights. Prompt discussion of this New Focus by pointing out the parallels.” Guidance further notes, “To bring closure to the partner reading, ask partners to briefly discuss the Partner Focus before transitioning to the Comprehension Discussion.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the teacher asks students to discuss the following question with a partner: “Think about why Owen might be providing this demonstration. What do you think his goal is?” The materials provide teachers with a Teaching Tip for how to close out the discussion: “To bring closure to the partner reading, ask partners to briefly discuss the Partner Focus before transitioning to the Comprehension Discussion.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 29, students write a letter to author Allen Say. The materials provide a Teaching Tip that helps teacher reinforce the connections between the Shared Reading and ELA Lessons: “Depending on the order in which you teach Shared Reading and ELA, your students may or may not have completed the written response for Shared Reading that requires them to write a letter from Opal’s perspective to her mom yet. If they have not, you can still make the connection that they will be writing a letter similar to this one in Shared Reading.”

Indicator 1G
01/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1g.

The materials provide frequent and varied opportunities for students to participate in evidence-based discussions. While materials include evidence-based discussion opportunities, such as whole class discussions, partner work, reading and rereading together, and co-created writing pieces, materials do not provide protocols for these activities nor is there guidance for how or when teachers should model speaking and listening techniques. Materials provide teachers with some support in facilitating these conversations; however, the same types of tips and support are duplicated throughout the materials. Additionally, while the Teacher Manual provides guidance around “Building and Using Norms for Participation in Discussion, the instructional lessons and student speaking and listening opportunities do not reference the accountable talk measures outlined in the document.

Materials provide limited protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2-5 Teacher Manual includes a section called “Building and Using Norms for Participation in Discussion” that is based on the norms for Accountable Talk. This section provides teachers with prompts and sentence stems to use in various group discussion structures, but these guidelines are not referenced within the instructional lessons to support students’ speaking and listening skill development.

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teaching Manual, Understanding Shared Reading, materials include instructions for the Pair Share protocol students engage in. Each lesson has the same structure: “When partners are assigned, the daily routine is very simple. After word study, the teacher asks the pairs to spend 2–3 minutes discussing their answer to the previous day’s written response. This allows a transition, some authentic student talk, and a reentry into the text. Then the teacher sets a purpose for reading.”

  • In the Bookworm 2–5 Teacher’s Manual, Repeated Oral Reading, materials include the following guidance on a provided shared reading protocol: “Our oral reading protocols require teachers to create purposeful student pairs. The procedure we use comes from a well-documented intervention called Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) (Fuchs, Fuchs, Mathes, & Simmons, 1997). PALS pairs are made with students ranked by achievement, typically by their oral reading fluency. Teachers split the class in half, and then assign the pairs.”

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Understanding ELA: Read Alouds, materials include a chart explaining what the discussion during the Interactive Read Aloud should look and sound like for students: “Students answer individually or in partners, but always orally.” Additionally, during the Discussion portion of the lessons, materials include the following note: “There is a final question to bring closure to the day’s assigned pages. Again, it can be answered by an individual, but it can also be answered individually between partners.”

  • In the Bookworm 2–5 Teacher Manual, Repeated Oral Reading, materials include the following guidance on creating a shared reading protocol: “The resulting pairings all have a relatively more-fluent student paired with a relatively less-fluent student, but the fluency difference is controlled so that the most-fluent student (#1) is not paired with the least-fluent (#24). For teachers with an odd number of students, the most fluent student might remain unpartnered and either read alone or fill in for a student who is absent. For student pairs who have difficulty getting along, teachers will need to make pairing adjustments. Teachers can also create new pairs each quarter or whenever new data are available, but it is good to allow pairs to work together for an extended period so that they can become comfortable helping one another read and understand.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 6, students participate in a variety of evidence-based speaking and listening activities using the text, Owen Foote, Money Man by Stephanie Greene, including discussing the previous lesson’s writing assignment, a partner discussion about the main character, rereading in partnerships, and a whole class discussion about questions like “Why does Joseph have to cut the hook in order to get it out of Owen’s ear?,” “Why is there very little blood even after the hook comes out?,” and “Why is Owen glad when Joseph suggests that they don’t do the fishing video?” While materials provide these tasks and some directions for teachers and students, there is no evidence of a specific protocol used to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 7, students participate in a variety of evidence-based speaking and listening activities using the text, Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women’s Right by Helen Allbee Monsell, including discussing the previous lesson’s writing assignment, a partner discussion about the main character, rereading in partnerships, and a whole class discussion about questions, such as “Why does Susan like to do chores with her ?” While materials provide these tasks and some directions for teachers and students, there is no evidence of a specific protocol used to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 34, students engage in a discussion of Lon Po Po: A Red-Riding Hood Story from China by Ed Young and respond to the question, “Imagine that the author of our book, Ed Young, was visiting our class today. What questions would you like to ask him? Make sure that you use question words.” While materials provide these tasks and some directions for teachers and students, there is no evidence of a specific protocol used to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills.

Speaking and listening instruction includes some facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 41, as students read Here Lies the Librarian by Richard Peck, lesson guidance prompts the teacher to use data to form discussion groups: “Teaching Tip: Student pairs are formed in advance based on data. Pairs can reread by alternating pages or by rereading chorally.” This guidance occurs in each Shared Reading Lesson.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 3, materials provide teacher support on how to address a difficult topic when discussing Rosa by Nikki Giovanni: “In today’s reading, the term ‘colored’ is introduced for the first time. The policeman also refers to Rosa as ‘Auntie.’ Consider addressing these words, the time period in which they were used, and what they meant. You might wish to preview the text ahead of time so that you can plan for discussions around these topics, determine how you will address them in a way you feel is appropriate for you and your class, and decide how you would like to handle this content.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 14, students share their stories with a partner. Teaching tips advise the teacher to pull students who are having difficulty storytelling and facilitate the discussion in a small group.

Indicator 1H
01/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1h.

While materials include opportunities to support students’ speaking and listening about the texts students read and research, materials lack varied discussion strategies, guidance on how students should respond, and relevant follow-up questions and supports for teachers. The Teacher Manual indicates that teachers should provide relevant and more rigorous follow up questions as student discussions progress; however, materials do not provide a model to support teachers with implementation. Materials provide limited opportunities for students to engage in longer speaking and listening activities, such as presentations or oral research reports. Many of the listening and speaking about what they are reading opportunities are included only in Shared Reading or only in ELA lessons which does not allow for students to demonstrate what they are reading throughout the year.

Students have limited opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation and other information known about the topic to explore ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 12, students “discuss written responses from [the] previous lesson with a partner.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 17, students review informational writing checklists with a partner and share their written work with the class. Students reference the checklist during their share out.

  • Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., gaining the floor in respectful ways, listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 31, the teacher provides students with the following guidance during the Sharing portion of the lesson: “Today, turn and read your draft to someone sitting near you. Then switch and listen to a partner read their review.” Students do not follow an agreed-upon set of rules for this discussion.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 28, the teacher explains to students how to be an active listener, including rules such as,”Listen with your whole body;” “Keep your eyes on the speaker;” and “Listen with your brain.” Students share their advertisements with a partner and listen for the three components of active listening and presentations.

  • Create engaging audio recordings of stories or poems that demonstrate fluid reading at an understandable pace; add visual displays when appropriate to emphasize or enhance certain facts or details. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • No evidence found

Speaking and listening work sometimes requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Ask questions to check understanding of information presented, stay on topic, and link their comments to the remarks of others. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • No evidence found

  • Explain their own ideas and understanding in light of the discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Shared Reading Plans, Module 4, Lesson 21, students work in partner groups and read about how Greece was different from other civilizations. During the Comprehension Discussion that follows, students offer their own understanding to questions such as, “How are some buildings today like Greek buildings? How was Greece different from earlier civilizations? Why was the time between 1200 and 700 called the dark ages? Why the word dark?”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 13, the teacher directs students to “Turn and talk to your partner about what kind of text a fantasy is. Think about the parts that I just told you about.”

  • Determine the main ideas and supporting details of a text read aloud or information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 11, the teacher facilitates students’ discussion of Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl: “Let’s describe Mrs. Pratchett first. What traits would you assign to her? The title of the next chapter is ‘The Great Mouse Plot.’ Now let’s think about what the Great Mouse Plot might be. A plot is like a plan. What would the goal be?”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 3, students listen to a reread of the text, Bringing the Rain to the Kapiti Plain by Verna Aardema. After listening, students participate in a discussion to identify actions and consequences, as well as causes and effects.

  • Ask and answer questions about information from a speaker, offering limited elaboration and detail. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 16, students participate in a whole group discussion about why the atmosphere is important when reading a chapter of the text, Twisters and Other Terrible Storms by Will Osborne and Mary Pope Osborne. After the group discussion, students move into their Partner Focus, where they are able to continue thinking about “questions they hope the author will answer in this book.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 14, the teacher says to students, “Now I want you to think of a good question to ask about what we’ve read today. Then ask your partner that question.”

  • Report on a topic or text, tell a story, or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking clearly at an understandable pace. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Plans, Module 2, Lesson 30, students share their opinions, reasons, and evidence in preparation for drafting a book review. The teacher asks, “I would like for you to share your opinion, reasons, and details with someone who is writing about a different book than you.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 27, students complete an infographic and prepare to share it with their class. Included directions instruct students to “speak clearly, use complete sentences and know their stuff.”

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials include on-demand writing tasks and process writing opportunities throughout the Shared Reading and ELA instructional bocks. Across the Shared Reading lessons, students have almost daily opportunities to write short responses to prompts about what they have read. Shorter and longer on-demand responses usually occur during the “Assign Writing” section of the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and are primarily text-based prompts. Process writing pieces occur during the ELA block over the course of several lessons, with opportunities for modeling, drafting and revising with teacher and peer feedback. Over the course of the year, students write narratives, informative pieces, opinion pieces, incorporating research as needed. Materials provide teachers with guidance on how to model each type of writing during the pre-writing, drafting, revising, and editing stages. Materials include some explicit teacher guidance that suggests students type their responses, and there is room for teachers to use students’ typed responses more frequently to incorporate digital resources into the writing process.

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, students write a two-part on-demand response after reading Owen Foote, Money Man by Stephanie Greene. Teacher guidance is as follows: “A written response should first be scored for accuracy and then for evidence. Consider using the Grade 3 Written Response Rubric when scoring student responses. Because there is no time for revision and editing, please do not score for conventions.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 27, during Assign Writing, students respond to the following prompts and questions: “1. Use produce and exception in super sentences. You can choose to capture key details from today’s reading in your sentences, or you can choose to write your sentences using a different topic. 2. What does the author mean on page 18 when she says that Winn-Dixie was making the preacher poke his head out of his shell? Is the language literal or figurative?”

  • In the Shared Reading Plans, Module 3, Lesson 41, students respond to the following prompt and question after reading The Story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Biography Book for New Readers by Susan B. Katz: “Use inspired and trailblazer in super sentences. You can choose to capture key details from today’s reading in your sentences, or you can choose to write your sentences using a different topic.” and “Based on what we have read in Chapter 1, what obstacles did Ruth Bader Ginsburg face as a young girl?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, students write in response to the following prompt: “Edward has lived in two settings: with Abilene and with Nellie and the fisherman. Compare and contrast these two settings. How was life similar and different for Edward?” Guidance directs teachers to score the response for accuracy and evidence but not conventions because there is no time for revision and editing.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 9, students read Biome by Bobbie Kalman. Students “write a paragraph” that tells the teacher “what you think would happen if all of the wolves suddenly disappeared. Give your opinion and your reasons.” Materials provide students with a starter sentence. 

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 41, students begin their five-day Culminating Task that focuses on narrative writing: “In this Culminating Task, students will plan and write an alternate ending to the tall tale, Febold Feboldson.” Throughout the progression, “students work both collaboratively and independently using checklists to evaluate the quality of their writing in order to revise, edit, and publish a final copy of their tall tale alternate ending.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 16–25, students write an informative essay after studying various informational texts earlier in the module. Throughout this set of lessons, the teacher models how to write an informative essay and students have time to practice both individually and in groups. In Lesson 20, the teacher directs students to revise their work: “Today during your work time, you will do just what we did here, but with all three paragraphs. Use your checklists to see what elements you are missing and then see if you can add any missing elements to your writing.” In Lesson 25, the teacher explains the difference between revising and editing, then provides time for students to do this during partner and individual work.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 41, students begin the first of a five-day lesson series on the Opinion Writing Culminating Task. Students have the opportunity to outline, draft, revise, and give peer feedback throughout this series of lessons. An overview of the task, including the work students will complete, is as follows: “Students will show what they have learned about injustice through opinion writing. First, students will discuss their opinions on injustice, demonstrating their growing ability to speak and listen as they demonstrate knowledge. They will then begin planning their opinion text using a graphic organizer to identify strong reasons and evidence to support their opinions, either from the text, from personal experience, or in the form of a counter-argument. After using the information in the completed organizer to compose a draft of their opinion text, students will work both collaboratively and independently to evaluate their writing using opinion writing and editing checklists. They will provide and utilize peer feedback based on the checklists to revise, edit, and prepare their writing for publication.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 36–40, students write a narrative about their identities as readers and writers. Throughout this set of lessons, the teacher models how to write a narrative and provides time for students to practice these skills both individually and with others. Lesson 38 “focuses on revising writing by using effective word choice to capture feelings in writing and to help paint vivid images in readers' minds.” In Lesson 40, the teacher invites “students to peer revise and edit and then work on their personal narrative book.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 30–33, students create a book advertisement to convince readers that their chosen book is the best. Students independently plan, write, design, revise, and edit their work. Students “revise and edit” their own writing as well as a peer’s writing as they prepare a final draft of their book advertisement. 

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Opinion Writing: Book Review, Assessment Notes, materials indicate that teachers should “Decide as a team how you display these Book Reviews. Post them in the hall, add them to an Amazon or Scholastic book review page, post to a class blog, or share in the school newsletter.” While these options are available to teachers, materials do not provide explicit guidance on how to incorporate these digital resources.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 25, students may draft their written responses using computers. During the Modeling portion of the lesson, the teacher explains, “You will have a long time to work, but at the end of class I will need to collect your final copies. Please work quickly. You may write or type your final draft.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 39, the Planning Notes describe how students can create a book using paper to publish their personal narrative and also outline an option to use technology: “You may have a different idea for how to construct this book. If you have access to technology, you might consider having students create a digital book, slide presentation, or a different digital display of their personal narrative. Keep in mind that you will need to adjust your model accordingly to reflect these choices.” While these options are available to teachers, materials do not provide explicit guidance on how to incorporate these digital resources.

Indicator 1J
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.

Materials reflect a 33/33/33 balance of opinion/informative or explanatory/narrative writing, which mostly reflects the 30/35/35 distribution of writing modes required by the standards for Grades 3–5. Throughout the year, students receive explicit writing instruction and opportunities to write opinion, informative, and narrative pieces. Writing instruction occurs during the ELA Lesson Plans and often involves the teacher reading aloud a text and modeling “how to construct a well-written response” to a prompt. The interactive read-aloud often serves as a mentor text. Most writing opportunities connect to this text and occasionally connect to texts in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, there are four opportunities for opinion writing and instruction. Four of twelve (33%) opportunities are opinion in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans Module 1, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is opinion in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is opinion in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of two writing opportunities for this module is opinion in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, there is one opportunity for opinion writing. One of four writing opportunities for this module is opinion in nature.

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, there are four opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. Four of twelve (33%) opportunities are informative/explanatory in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is informative/explanatory in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is informative/explanatory in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of two writing opportunities for this module is informative/explanatory in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, there is one opportunity for informative/explanatory writing. One of four writing opportunities for this module is informative/explanatory in nature.

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, there are four opportunities for narrative writing. Four of twelve (33%) opportunities are narrative in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is narrative in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, there is one opportunity for narrative writing. One of three writing opportunities for this module is narrative in nature.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, there are two opportunities for narrative writing. Two of four writing opportunities for this module are narrative in nature.

  • Explicit instruction in opinion writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 33–40, the teacher models the structure and purpose of opinion writing. The teacher and students co-create a list of opinion writing elements. Then, the teacher guides students in using the Opinion Writing Checklist to evaluate provided text sets.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 30–32, the teacher models writing a book review. The teacher models writing the review using a graphic organizer that includes sections for an introduction, reasons, and a conclusion. Then the teacher provides guidance as students work independently on writing their book review.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 41–45, the teacher uses Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor as a mentor text to model writing an opinion piece about a controversial topic.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 31–35, the teacher models writing a book advertisement. The teacher models advertising techniques and how to creatively include reasoning. As students work independently on these skills, the teacher provides guidance.

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 6–8, the teacher uses Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl as a mentor text to model informative writing.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 16–25, the teacher models writing a research report. The teacher models using a graphic organizer to draft the introduction, subtopics, and conclusion, including how to revise to add more information. The teacher also models how to revise and edit. As students work independently on these skills, the teacher provides guidance.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 18–25, the teacher uses Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women’s Rights by Helen Albee Monsell as a mentor text to model research report writing. The teacher uses a graphic organizer and the text to model writing the introduction of a biography research report using the Informative Writing Checklist and Rubric.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 21–30, the teacher models research report writing.

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 1–5, the teacher models the structure and purpose of narrative writing. The teacher and students co-create a list of narrative elements and look for those elements in sample narratives. The teacher uses a graphic organizer to teach students how to plan and organize their writing that includes an introduction, two events, and a conclusion.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 41–45, the teacher models how to write a tall tale using a graphic organizer that includes an introduction, two events, and a conclusion. The teacher also models how to use literary devices and dialogue to revise a narrative. Using the narrative checklist, the teacher models how to conclude a narrative.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 11–20, the teacher models writing a narrative adaptation of Pinduli by Janell Cannon. The teacher models how to write an introduction, describe the events in the narrative, and write a conclusion that leaves a lasting feeling with the reader. As students work independently on these skills, the teacher provides guidance.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 36–40, the teacher models writing a personal narrative. The teacher models how to brainstorm ideas, how to draft and organize the narrative, and how to revise to include more details. As students work independently on these skills, the teacher provides guidance.

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce the topic or text they are writing about, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure that lists reasons. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 31–35, students write a book advertisement. Although students do not use a dedicated graphic organizer to plan, students should refer to the “Book Review Checklist.” The checklist states that students should include the title, author, topic, and opinion in the beginning.

    • Provide reasons that support the opinion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 36–37, students work with a partner to find more reasons with details to complete their organizer. Students share their details for each reason. In Lesson 37, students work with a group to write the next reason paragraphs.

    • Use linking words and phrases (e.g., because, therefore, since, for example) to connect opinion and reasons. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 36, students work with the teacher to decide which linking words they will include to connect reasons to their opinion from the following list, additionally, furthermore, similarly, equally, above all, and especially.

    • Provide a concluding statement or section. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 31, students use sentence frames to draft their book review. The frame they use for the concluding section says, “I think that readers will ________ (an adjective that supports your opinion) ________ (title), I know I did! I think they should/should not read it too.”

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce a topic and group related information together; include illustrations when useful to aid comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 18, students use their graphic organizer and sentence frame to write their book reviews. The introduction on the graphic organizer should include the topic and an interesting detail.

    • Develop the topic with facts, definitions, and details. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 21, students respond to think-aloud prompts to organize their paragraphs with key details about their subject’s life.

    • Use linking words and phrases (e.g., also, another, and, more, but) to connect ideas within categories of information. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 22, students review a chart of transition words and phrases as part of the drafting cycle. Students use a list of transition words to add to their draft informative/explanatory piece.

    • Provide a concluding statement or section. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 23, students work on writing the ending to their Biography Research Report. They work on restating their topic and purpose and leaving the reader with some kind of message.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Establish a situation and introduce a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 11, students begin writing an adaptation of Pinduli by Janelle Cannon using a graphic organizer to plan their writing. The graphic organizer indicates that the introduction should include the character, setting, and an interesting detail.

    • Use dialogue and descriptions of actions, thoughts, and feelings to develop experiences and events or show the response of characters to situations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 4–5, students work with a partner to add two more details to their graphic organizer to finish telling the Hula Hoop story. In lesson 5, students add details to help describe the events so that the readers understand what happens next in the hula hoop game.

    • Use temporal words and phrases to signal event order. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 17, “students read through their draft and determine where they need temporal words to help move their story along.”

    • Provide a sense of closure. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 37, students write the conclusion to their personal narrative about their reading and writing identity. Using their graphic organizer, they summarize their thoughts and feelings about themselves as readers and writers across the year.

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 6, the teacher reads excerpts from Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl to the class to model how informative writing differs from narrative writing. Students work with a partner or in small groups to review sets of informative texts collected by the teacher and discuss what the texts have in common with Boy: Tales of Childhood. Students share the two similarities they feel are most important to include in informative writing with other partners or small groups and work with the teacher to develop an anchor chart that lists the elements of informative writing.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 11–20, students write a narrative adaptation of their most recent read-aloud text, Pinduli by Janell Cannon.

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k.

Materials provide frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing throughout the school year. Both the Shared Reading and ELA Lessons include opportunities to utilize texts as mentor texts or as curricular connections to aid students with using evidence to support their thinking. The teacher models using evidence to support thinking and provides students opportunities to practice these skills in various grouping strategies. As students transition through the phases of the writing process, they apply their evidence-based writing skills using graphic organizers and checklists included in the materials.

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 30-32, the teacher models how to write a book review that includes an introduction, reasons with support from the text and a conclusion. In Lesson 31, after the students fill in a graphic organizer based on the teacher’s model, the teacher provides the students with a frame to help them write their book review in an organized way. The frame says, “_____ (title), written by_____ (author) is a _____ (adjective from graphic organizer) book about _____ (big idea from the story). I _____ (opinion about book)_____ (title) because _____ (reason you had your opinion). The first reason that this was _____ (restate your opinion/adjective) was because _____ (provide details to support opinion). Another reason that this book was _____ (restate opinion/adjective) was because _____ (provide details to support opinion). A final reason that this book was _____ (restate opinion/adjective) was because _____ (provide details to support opinion). I think that readers will _____ (an adjective that supports your opinion) _____ (title), I know I did! I think they should/should not read it too.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 33, the teacher models how to use the checklist to ensure the book advertisement has everything it needs to have. The teacher says to students, “I am going to show you how I will revise my ad. When I look back at my advertisement and compare it [to] the checklist, I see that I might need to do a better job of giving an example from the story without giving too much away for my readers.”

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 20, students respond to the prompt, “Think about how Peter is feeling in these last two chapters of the book. Our main character seems to have learned an important life lesson in this book, just like Owen in Owen Foote, Money Man. How have Peter’s feelings about spending his summer vacation in Maine with Sheila changed since the beginning of the book? What do you think he has learned?” In previous lessons throughout Module 1, Unit 2, students gather evidence through shared anchor charts, group and partner discussions, and shorter writing responses about the text.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 15, students read two informational texts with different text features. Students “[t]hink about the different text features that we have encountered in this text, Soil, Maps and Globes, and What is A Biome? Think about how they each helped you to more easily understand information from the text. If you were writing an information book, would you use the same features in each chapter or different ones? Give reasons for your opinion.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 36, during the read aloud of _The BFG _by Roald Dahl, students use a class-created anchor chart to complete their graphic organizer for the Culminating Task. The teacher provides students with a copy of the text, as students work with a partner to gather reasons and supporting details for the opinion writing task on character traits.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 41–42, students begin writing an opinion response about injustice using details from the text, Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor. In Lesson 41, students work in groups to discuss and gather details for their opinions in preparation for outlining in Lesson 42.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 10, students write a short opinion text with teacher guidance, “We will write it together.” “Help me write a paragraph and tell whether we think it was really fair for Pinduli to fool the animals so that they believe something that isn’t true and will leave her food forever. We need to remember to give reasons.” The teacher provides students with a structure to use: “Tell what happened. Then give our opinion. Then give our reasons. Then see why our reasons are related to our opinion. Then talk about what Pinduli did again to close.”

Indicator 1L
01/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1l.

Materials include instruction of many grammar and language conventions standards; however, there are limited opportunities for application in- and out-of-context. An explicit scope and sequence is not provided. Some grammar skills are referenced in the lessons, but there is a lack of explicit instruction and practice. Throughout the materials, grammar and conventions instruction and application are integrated into the writing process and Shared Reading plans. The program includes many opportunities for students to manipulate sentences with the teacher and write independently, but according to the Teacher Manual, there is not an expectation of the students to be able to identify parts of speech independently. The teacher routinely identifies the parts of speech. Although the rubrics assess grammar and convention skills such as commas in addresses, some skills are not explicitly taught. Additionally, students complete writing prompts in the student workbook but do not routinely apply specific grammar skills.

Materials include some explicit instruction of many grammar and usage standards for the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Explain the function of nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs in general and their functions in particular sentences.

    • Nouns:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, the teacher shares the sentence, “This was the treatment that all of his children received before they were born.” The teacher states, “This was the _____ that all of his children received before they were born. I have removed a noun. What other nouns could we use here? Think about both concrete nouns that represent actual things and abstract ones that represent ideas.”

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 27, the teacher shares the sentence, “The border of the quilt was made of Anna’s babushka.” The teacher removes the noun border and tells students they have removed a noun in the sentence and that border is a noun. The teacher says, “There are other nouns that we could substitute that could refer to areas of a quilt. Let’s see if we can think of eight.”

    • Pronouns:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 16, the teacher states, “When you write today, remember to consider replacing repetitive nouns with pronouns and to link sentences with words and phrases.”

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 16, the teacher shares the sentence, “He used it to look at snow.” The teacher states, “Let’s substitute the pronouns. It is a pronoun, and we know that it refers to a singular noun. If the author was substituting a pronoun for a plural noun, she would have used them. So what is it?” The teacher shares the sentence, “He used a microscope to look at snow,” and the teacher says, “Now let’s substitute the pronoun he. Is that a singular or plural pronoun?” A third sentence is shared and the teacher asks students to change the meaning so that both are plural.

    • Verbs:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, the teacher presents the following sentence, “Plants provide food and shelter for animals.” The teacher tells students that plants is a plural noun. The teacher asks what other plural nouns can be substituted and then continues asking students if they wanted a singular noun, how would that influence the verb.

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 4, the teacher shares the sentence, “As he walks home, he thinks about the future.” The teacher removes the word thinks from the sentence and tells students think is a verb because it is something we can do. The teacher states, “A verb is a word that represents an action. Verbs can have different forms. This verb has to work with the pronoun he. What other verbs could make sense here?” Students brainstorm other verbs that would make sense in the sentence.

    • Adjectives:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 22, the teacher states, “Adjectives tell information about nouns. Let’s make a list of great ones.”

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 30, the teacher tells students that, “adjectives are words that describe nouns, and our books are nouns. Share some adjectives that we can use.”

    • Adverbs:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 16, the teacher shares the sentence, “They were too far away for their faces to be seen clearly.” The teacher removes the adverb clearly and states, “I have removed clearly, which is an adverb telling us more about how the faces were seen. Adverbs often end with the –ly suffix, and they answer a “how” question. What else could make sense there? Let’s see if we can list eight other adverbs.”

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 38, the teacher shares the sentence, “I get up as quietly as I can.” The teacher says, “Quietly is an adverb. It adds details about the verb get up. Adverbs often end in -ly. What other adverbs can we substitute?”

  • Form and use regular and irregular plural nouns.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 15, the teacher presents the sentence, “Three of four other giants were sitting quite motionless on the rocks.” The teacher tells students, “If I remove giants, I need another plural noun. That’s why we see the verb were instead of was. One giant was sitting, but three or four were sitting. Most plural nouns end in s or es; but there are also irregular nouns. What’s the plural of person? What’s the plural of woman? What’s the plural of mouse? What other plural nouns could we substitute?” The teacher talks about rocks and tells students, “Rocks is also a plural noun. For this last phrase, do we need a plural? Could it be rock? What other nouns could make sense here? Remember that you have to check your writing to be sure that plural nouns are matched with plural verbs and remember that some plurals end in s or es, but others don’t.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 18, the teacher shares the sentence, “‘Are they animals?’ Sophie asked.” The teacher says, “I am removing a plural noun from the end of a question. Let’s substitute other plural nouns first. Remember, plural nouns end in s or es, or are irregular. Let’s think of some that end in s, and some that don’t.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 3, Sentence Composing: Imitate, the teacher presents two sentences to demonstrate regular and irregular plural nouns: “The grass grew green and the cattle fat. The grass grew green and the _____ fat.” The teacher states, “Cattle is a noun, and it’s an irregular plural. Can we use either singular or plural nouns here? The grass grew green and the _____ _____.” The teacher says, “I took out the ending adjective. This is poetry, so the format with an ending adjective is a nice touch. We could also say ‘the green grass’ and ‘the cattle grew fat,’ but the author’s choice is better. Let’s take our nouns and assign adjectives.”

  • Use abstract nouns (e.g., childhood).

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, the teacher shows the sentence, “This was the treatment that all of his children received before they were born.” The teacher says, “I have removed a noun. What other nouns could we use here? Think about both concrete nouns that represent actual things and abstract ones that represent ideas.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 33, students learn about how to use abstract nouns, which the program refers to as figurative nouns. The teacher states, “Change is a noun. We can substitute nearly any noun. Can you think of a figurative substitution? Remember that nouns can represent ideas. What can you give that is not a physical thing? I _____ him all the _____ I had.”

  • Form and use regular and irregular verbs.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 25, the teacher gives students the sentence, “Sophie kissed him on the tip of his thumb.” The teacher presents the sentence, “Sophie ______ him on the tip of his thumb.” The teacher states, “Kissed is a verb here. What other verbs could we use? Sophie ______ him on the ______ of his ______. Both tip and thumb are actually nouns. What other nouns could we substitute? We can be creative. It’s easier if you do the first one first.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 29, the teacher shows students the sentence, “The Pacific Ocean astonished him.” The teacher shows the sentence, “The Pacific Ocean _____ him.” The teacher states, “I am removing a verb in the past tense. What other past tense verbs could we use? What other emotions could he have felt? Could we also use action verbs? Could the ocean have covered him? Froze him? Drowned him? The Pacific Ocean _____ _____.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 33, the teacher shares the sentence, “I gave him all the change I had.” The teacher says, “Gave is the irregular past tense of give. What other past tense verbs can we put here? If we used a present tense verb, what editing would we need to do?”

  • Form and use the simple (e.g., I walked; I walk; I will walk) verb tenses.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, the teacher shares the sentence, “This was the treatment that all of his children received before they were born.” The teacher says, “Received is a verb and it is in the past tense. What other past tense verbs could work here? Remember that we can change the meaning.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 26, the teacher tells students to notice the tense the author uses while the teacher reads the text aloud. After reading the sentence “She’s looking at me when she says it though,” the teacher prompts students to notice the use of present tense. The teacher tells students that most novels are written in the past tense and asks students why they think this author has used the present tense? The teacher tells students, “One reason is that it lends a sense of immediacy to events, as though they are happening right now.”

  • Ensure subject-verb and pronoun-antecedent agreement.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, the teacher shows students the sentence, “Three or four other giants were sitting quite motionless on the rocks.” The teacher gives the sentence, “Three or four other ______ were sitting quite motionless on the rocks.” The teacher states, “If I remove giants, I need another plural noun. That’s why we see the verb were instead of was. One giant was sitting, but three or four were sitting. Most plural nouns end in s or es, but there are also irregulars. What’s the plural of person? What’s the plural of woman? What’s the plural of mouse? What other plural nouns could we substitute? “Three or four other ______ were sitting quite motionless on the ______.” Rocks is also a plural noun. For this last phrase, do we need plural? Could it be rock? What other nouns could make sense here? Remember that you have to check your writing to be sure that plural nouns are matched with plural verbs and remember that some plurals end in s or es, but others don’t.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, students practice pronoun-antecedent agreement. The teacher gives students the sentence, “The kangaroo loped along. The kangaroo was motionless for a time.” The teacher states, “I notice right away that the subject of the two sentences is the same. I may be able to substitute one with a pronoun. The correct substitution for kangaroo is it.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 39, the teacher presents a sentence and asks, “What if I remove the pronoun I? We can substitute other nouns or pronouns, but make sure that you check to see that your subject and verb agree. You may have to make some small edits.”

  • Form and use comparative and superlative adjectives and adverbs, and choose between them depending on what is to be modified.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 7, the teacher combines two sentences using linking words. The teacher expands the sentence, “The vapor condenses.” The teacher states, “Let’s start with an adjective to tell more about the vapor. How about an adverb to tell more about the verb condenses? Now let’s tell how and why this whole thing happens.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 26, students learn about comparatives and superlatives. The teacher gives students the sentence, “Sistersville was one of the best places you could live in the whole state.” The teacher then gives the sentence, “Sistersville was one of the ______ places you could live in the whole state.” The teacher states, “Best is a superlative adjective. Best is the best form! Good, better, best! Let’s make sure that we substitute a dramatic word here.“

  • Use coordinating and subordinating conjunctions.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 6, students learn about coordinating conjunctions. The teacher starts with the sentence, “The sun had come up. The sun was shining fiery hot over the great yellow wasteland.” The teacher explains how to combine sentences by stating, “When we combine, we look for repetition and try to eliminate it. I see the sun twice. If I were to substitute the sun with a pronoun, what would it be? If we connect these two ideas with the word and, what do we have? ‘The sun had come up, and it was shining fiery hot over the great yellow wasteland.’”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 6, the teacher states, “How does our choice of conjunctions and linking words influence the meaning? Can we use and? What about and then? Does or change the meaning? When you are writing today, think about whether you are using the most precise conjunctions and linking words.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 7, the teacher combines the sentences, “Each member received a small amount of money. Each member used it to make more money. Each member paid it back.” The teacher explains, “We can create a series of actions. Remember, to do this, we will need commas and a conjunction right before the last action. We must also remember to keep the details that follow each verb. Now all we need is a conjunction. Let’s see which ones would make the most sense. We can use and to signal that there is one more action to be added to the series.”

  • Produce simple, compound, and complex sentences.

    • Simple:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, the teacher begins with a sentence and prompts students to add details to expand the sentence. The teacher says, “Today we’ve generated some interesting verbs and nouns, and we’ve added details to a simple sentence. In your writing, see if you can replace a simple noun or verb with a more interesting one. And try to start at least one sentence with a when or why detail. Think about commas.”

    • Compound:

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 3, the teacher shows students the sentences, “She thought about her mother. She also thought about her grandmother. She knew they would want her to be strong.” The teacher talks through a think-aloud about combining sentences by stating, “I can see that the first two sentences are simple to combine. I’ll do that first. ‘She thought about her mother and her grandmother. She knew they would want her to be strong.’ I can see how these could be combined with and: ‘She thought about her mother and her grandmother and knew they would want her to be strong.’ If I combine with because, the meaning is slightly different: ‘She thought about her mother and her grandmother because she knew they would want her to be strong.’ How about this? ‘Because she knew they would want her to be strong, she thought about her mother and her grandmother.’

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, the teacher asks students to take a look at the given sentence and says, “It’s a compound. Her name is Amma is a complete sentence. She is a teacher is a complete sentence. They are combined with the conjunction and, so we see the comma.”

    • Complex

      • No evidence was found of instruction on complex sentences.

  • Capitalize appropriate words in titles.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Appendix A includes an editing checklist. One element listed is, “I capitalized names, holidays, locations, dates, and appropriate words in titles.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 3, the teacher says, “If we use the book title, it’s a proper noun so we have to capitalize it.”

    • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 103, the teacher checks for correct capitalization on the writing rubric. The rubric states, “The student uses grade-appropriate capitalization (e.g., first word in sentence, pronoun I, names of holidays, locations, dates, appropriate words in titles).”

    • No evidence of explicit instruction was found.

  • Use commas in addresses.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Grade 3, Lesson 29, the teacher is to “place format on the board with address, date and salutation.”

    • No evidence of explicit instruction was found.

  • Use commas and quotation marks in dialogue.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Grade 3, Lesson 17, the teacher models and states, “Let’s write down a suggestion or two for what Sophie might say to get the giant to take her back home. Since we are writing as Sophie, we need to remember to use quotation marks. I’ll show you the correct form. Sophie could say, ‘_____.’”

  • Form and use possessives.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, the teacher instructs students on possessive pronouns. The teacher states, “Let’s try its living things. Remember that its is the possessive spelling.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 33, the teacher states, “Now let’s start from scratch. I want a possessive now, with an apostrophe s, and then a noun. Be careful in your writing with the apostrophe. It can do two things for you. It can represent missing letters in a contraction, or it can show possession.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 35, the teacher states, “I see two words with ‘s. Remember that that can signal two different meanings. It can be a contraction for has or is, or it can be a possessive. Dad’s beside me has to be a contraction for dad is. That means that Shiloh’s is probably possessive. It must be Shiloh’s eyes.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 38, the teacher states, “Let’s look at everybody’s. It could be possessive, or it could be a contraction. If it’s a possessive, it has to take a noun. The only one it could be is days. If it’s a contraction, it means everybody is, and I would expect a verb. The only one that would work is everybody’s petting him. That makes sense.”

  • Use conventional spelling for high-frequency and other studied words and for adding suffixes to base words (e.g., sitting, smiled, cries, happiness).

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 13, the teacher discusses the word powerlessness and says, “This is an unusual word because it has two suffixes. I will underline them. Power means you can make decisions about your life. If we do not have power, then we are powerless. If I want to use it as a noun, then I add -ness. We read that Cesar wanted to use his ‘imagination to find ways to overcome powerlessness.’ Let me give you another example. What if I said that the mailman likes my street because of its doglessness?”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the teacher states, “We are going to learn how to add the suffixes -ed and -ing to words. We need to look for patterns. First we will sort our base words into three categories. The categories are CVVC, CVC, and CVCC. Remember that our vowels are a, e, i, o, and u. I’ll show you a base word. We will look at the end of the word, and we’ll sort into one of three categories. Once we are done, we will add our suffixes so that we can see the patterns.”

  • Use spelling patterns and generalizations (e.g., word families, position-based spellings, syllable patterns, ending rules, meaningful word parts) in writing words.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 6, the students learn generalizations. The teacher states, “We are learning that for base words in our CVVC and CVCC categories, we don’t double. For base words that end in CVC, we double that final consonant. We are going to add another pattern. This week we will also have words that end in CVC-e. I’ll show you a base word. We will look at the end of the word, and we’ll sort into one of four categories. Once we are done, we will add our suffixes so that we can see the patterns. Sort all base words, and then all words with suffixes. We can see that for base words in our CVVC and CVCC categories, we don’t double. For base words that end in CVC, we double that final consonant. For base words that end in CVC-e, we drop the e and add -ed or -ing.” The students use the following words: CVCC Words: fish, fished, fishing, blink, blinked, blinking CVC-e Words: hate, hated, hating, like, liked, liking, care, cared, caring, live, lived, living

    • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, Appendix E: Word Study Scope and Sequence, the words used during Word Study instruction are provided in detail and labeled by their spelling patterns.

  • Consult reference materials, including beginning dictionaries, as needed to check and correct spellings.

    • No evidence was found.

  • Choose words and phrases for effect.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 10, the teacher models adding transition words and phrases. The teacher says, “Sometimes when you write informative text, your writing sounds like a list of facts and that can be boring to a reader. Today I am going to show you how to make your biography flow more smoothly by adding transition words or phrases. These words are also called linking words. This is not new for you, but I want you to spend time today trying some different words or phrases that you may not have used it before. The checklist does include linking words as an element of informative text. Let’s look at a list of examples of transition words and phrases. Some of these words show time order like first, second, next, and then. Other linking words like also, in addition,and furthermore help to signal that new information is coming.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 1-5, students complete the Expand exercise. The teacher teaches the students to select words and phrases for effect in this activity.

  • Recognize and observe differences between the conventions of spoken and written standard English.

    • No evidence of explicit instruction was found.

Materials include limited authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate the application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 1-5, Sentence Composing, students apply grammar and convention skills during the Combine and Expand exercises. This activity is oral, and students are not writing.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 43, the teacher invites students to begin writing drafts and adding in dialogue.

Indicator 1M
01/02

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1m.

Materials include a cohesive year-long plan for students to interact with and build key vocabulary words in texts. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual outlines various vocabulary-teaching routines for teachers to use with students, along with how this is integrated into the Shared Reading and Differentiated Instruction blocks. The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual also provides guidance on how the lessons support vocabulary development over the course of the year and explains the focus on Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary as supported by key research. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage with vocabulary words multiple times within a text, however the vocabulary words do not repeat across multiple texts.

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Structures, materials include a table outlining routines and how instruction should look and sound for interactive read alouds in the ELA block. The vocabulary structure is as follows: “If the text is informational, vocabulary instruction comes before reading. The routines nearly always include visual support and should follow the plans closely. If the text is narrative, vocabulary instruction comes after reading. It is entirely oral, and uses a repetitive frame: Repeat the target word, tell a simple definition, tell how it was used in the reading, and then use a sentence frame to help students use the word in a new context.”

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Teaching Vocabulary, materials outline the various routines used during vocabulary instruction.

    • Labeled Diagram: “In this routine, we use an illustration from the book or one that can be simply drawn and either discuss labels already shown or add labels.” Lesson Plans include samples of labeled diagrams “for teacher guidance and reference.”

    • Simple Tree Diagrams: used “to show relationships among content words.”

    • Semantic Maps: “These tend to be structured with a central term, and characteristics or facets that are added over time as more information is provided in the text.”

    • Concept of Definition (COD) maps: used when introducing “terms that are members of a broad category. The maps can be drawn while describing the category membership…. You begin with the target term, then move up to its parent category, present a member of that category that is different from the central term, and then provide essential attributes and examples.” Lesson Plans include teacher guidance explaining “exactly how to construct and introduce the COD map.”

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Vocabulary and Comprehension, materials explain how vocabulary fits in the program’s approach to foundational skills instruction. The Differentiated Instruction block small group lesson plans follow a similar routine to that of whole group instruction. Students who meet oral reading fluency benchmarks read silently. After reading a fiction text, the teacher teaches students “two Tier 2 words found in the day’s text segment.” Before reading a nonfiction text, the teacher introduces students to “technical vocabulary using a simple chart or diagram to indicate how the words are related.” After reading, the teacher asks students inferential questions, referring “to vocabulary as needed to tie concepts to comprehension.”

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) but does not repeat across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 7, students read Minerals, Rocks, and Soil  by Barbara J. Davis and learn new vocabulary words before reading the text. Before reading the text, the teacher says, “As we read we will learn the meanings of some very important words. Let’s list them and say them together. An element is a substance with just one kind of atom. Elements, like oxygen, iron, and calcium, can combine with each other and other elements in different ways to form minerals. A molecule is a particle made of two or more atoms. Molecules are so small, you need a microscope to see them.” The vocabulary words do not repeat across any other texts.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 16, students read The Boy who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba and Brian Mealer. The teacher introduces new vocabulary words prior to reading the text. For example, “Scorched is a verb that means burned or caused to become dried out due to flame or heat. I might say that the sun scorched our garden, so nothing has been able to grow. Scorched can also be used as an adjective. You could say that the scorched fields provided no crops. Scorch and scorching are other forms of the verb. Engine is a noun that can have multiple meanings. One meaning of engine is a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. I might say that the racer started the car’s engine to prepare for the race. The word engine can also refer to a railroad locomotive, or train.” The vocabulary words do not repeat across any other texts.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 9, students read Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl. After reading, the teacher discusses the vocabulary word, inconvenience, from the book. The teacher provides students with the definition and examples of the word while referencing the book: “In our book it says, ‘the loss of an arm, he used to say, caused him one serious inconvenience.’” The teacher describes the meaning of the word as it is used in context. The teacher continues the same procedure with another word, boundless. The teacher references the text and provides a sentence stem that the students can use: “Roald Dahl’s father was ____, and this may have influenced him to ____. We can probably come up with several different speculations here.” “You can use that word: I have a boundless ability to _____. My sister has boundless _____. When we went to the store, the _____ seemed boundless.” The vocabulary words do not repeat across any other texts…

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 1, before reading Rosa by Nikki Giovanni, the teacher introduces vocabulary words: “We’ll learn some important vocabulary words as we read this book. I’ll make a diagram to help us remember how they’re connected.” The teacher creates a semantic map and gives an informal definition for the words civil rights, segregation, and non violent protests. The vocabulary word does not repeat across any other texts.

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, Teaching Vocabulary, the program cites research conducted by Isabel Beck as the base for its approach to vocabulary instruction. During narrative texts, students focus on two Tier 2 vocabulary words each day. Research supports the teaching of these words “after reading because stopping for this instruction before or during reading would be distracting.” The manual notes the intentional selection of words that are “broadly useful,” “would likely come up in another text that students would read or listen to,” and “could become part of students’ oral vocabularies.” Materials include frame sentences to support students with using the vocabulary word themselves. Vocabulary work is oral. During informational read-aloud texts, students focus on tier 3 vocabulary words. Because these words are “typically associated with a specific content area,” the teacher introduces tier 3 words to students “before they listen or as they encounter [the words] to enhance understanding.” Materials also note that Tier 3 words are introduced “in cluster, or semantic networks, whenever possible.”

Criterion 1.3: Foundational Skills

04/08

Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.

Instruction on foundational skills occurs in both the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and the Differentiated Instruction (DI) block, though the small group instruction format of the DI block does not ensure that all students receive explicit instruction on all foundational skills. Materials provide some opportunities for students to learn phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills in the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans as well as during lessons from the Differentiated Instruction Manual. Explicit instruction of some phonics, word recognition, and word analysis occurs over the year, but the systematic progression is not delineated in a scope and sequence. Materials include limited opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills independently in connected texts. Students have opportunities to decode while using some explicitly taught word recognition and analysis strategies; however, these opportunities are often in isolation rather than with connected text. Students are not provided opportunities to read texts independently. Students can hear fluent reading modeled for them by the teacher; however, the concept of fluency is not directly addressed or explicitly taught. There is minimal evidence in the materials that students silently read in a meaningful way or that teachers systematically monitor individual fluency and accuracy during the Shared Reading Lesson Plans.

While the materials provide a set of instructional routines, they miss opportunities for students to be active participants in the learning and apply that learning in context. The lesson frameworks included in the DI Manual do not provide teachers with adequate support in planning lessons for all students nor do they provide full learning opportunities for students. Additionally, since the DI Manual is written to be curriculum agnostic, the materials miss opportunities to create explicit connections between the lessons in the Shared Reading/ELA blocks and the DI block, preventing cohesion and knowledge-building across the entire program. Because the DI Manual does not provide a comprehensive scope and sequence of foundational skills outside of how topics are set up in the table of contents, teachers are responsible for the bulk of lesson planning and determining the coherent sequence of foundational skills for each small group of students. Materials do not provide clear guidance on using assessment results and the generic lesson frameworks to support teachers with developing coherently sequenced foundational skills lessons.

Indicator 1N
02/04

Materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level foundational skills by providing explicit instruction in phonics, word analysis, and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1n.

The Grade 3 materials provide some opportunities for students to learn phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills in the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans as well as during lessons from the Differentiated Instruction Manual. Explicit instruction of some phonics, word recognition, and word analysis occurs over the year, but the systematic progression is not delineated in a scope and sequence. For example, while some prefixes and suffixes are taught, the instruction is as they arise with vocabulary words in the materials not specific to the prefixes and suffixes themselves. There is no clear and explicit instruction of the terms and purpose of prefixes and suffixes. Additionally, some irregularly spelled words are taught through some word study lessons, but the practice of identifying and approximating irregularly spelled words is not explicitly taught. While the teacher may periodically mention some of these skills during lessons, there is no evidence of students’ opportunities for guided practice, independent practice, or application. While some assessments and planning for follow-up instruction are in the Shared Reading plans, most assessments and follow-up instruction occur in the Differentiated Instruction Block; however, it is not certain that all students will receive this instruction or be assessed by these means.

Materials contain some explicit instruction of phonics, word recognition, and word analysis consistently over the course of the year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Identify and know the meaning of the most common prefixes and derivational suffixes.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 9, the teacher states boundless. The teacher says, “I see the suffix -less, which means without. Boundless means ‘without edges.’ When you wake up each day, you have boundless potential to learn. In our book it says, in big countries opportunities would be boundless.’ That means wonderful things could happen. Boundless means ‘without edges.’” In the same lesson, the teacher states inconvenience. The teacher says, “I see the prefix in- which means ‘not’. Convenient means a goal or plan is easy to reach. Inconvenience means that a goal or plan is not easy to reach.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 27, the teacher states watchful. The teacher says, “-Ful is a suffix that we use to make adjectives. It means ‘full of.’ Watchful means ‘observing closely, full of watching’. If students are watchful, they are looking carefully.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 42, the lesson includes the word injustice. The word is written as in-just-ice (prefix, closed, suffix). The teacher says, “Injustice is a noun that refers to a lack of justice or fairness. I might say that to treat someone differently because of the way that they look is an injustice. Justice is a noun that refers to fair behavior or treatment. We have also learned that the word justice can refer to a judge of the Supreme Court. Remember that in- is a prefix that means not or the opposite. The root word is just, which is an adjective meaning morally right and fair.”

  • Decode words with common Latin suffixes.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 13, the teacher states the word powerlessness. The teacher tells students this is an unusual word because it has two suffixes and shares the meaning of power. The teacher says, “If we do not have power, then we are powerless. If I want to use it as a noun, then I can add -ness. We read that Cesar wanted to use his imagination to find ways to overcome powerlessness.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the suffixes -ed and -ing are taught as part of word study. This continues in further lessons. However, no evidence was found of explicit instruction on decoding words with common Latin suffixes, such as -able, -ible, -ation, -ment, or -ty.

    • In the Shared Reading Lessons, Module 1, Lesson 28, the Word Study Spelling lesson asks students to add the suffix -ment to base words to form government, agreement, and disagreement.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, on page 237, the teacher states, “Today we will work with suffixes. A suffix is a word part used at the end of a word. You need to recognize suffixes when reading longer words. Remember that the suffix changes the meaning of the root word.” Because this is a differentiated instruction lesson, there is no certainty that all students will receive this instruction.

  • Decode multisyllable words.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 16, the teacher instructs students on using syllable patterns to help with reading and spelling. Students learn four types of syllables: closed syllables, open syllables, r-controlled syllables, and VC-e syllables. The teacher teaches students that words with more than one syllable are multisyllabic.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 19, after reviewing syllable types and doubling rules, the teacher has students add suffixes to multisyllable words.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Fluency and Comprehension with Multisyllabic Decoding generic lesson plan, page 209, the lesson includes multisyllabic introduction where students mark vowels and divide words. Students participate in choral response, first reading, second reading, and inferential discussion. Week 2 through 6 of the lesson plans focus on prefixes and suffixes. For example, Week 2 focuses on un-, re-, -ful, and -ly. However, it is not certain that all students will be taught these words.

  • Read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.

    • No evidence found for all students for explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words. Some irregularly spelled words are taught through weekly vocabulary instruction and the introduction of challenge words in word study in Shared Reading Lessons. Instruction is not explicit and systematic for directly teaching irregularly spelled words. For example:

      • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 26, Spelling Lessons, the students work with irregular words like agree (schwa a) to add the suffixes -ed and -ing.

      • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 31, Spelling Lesson, the students work with the word democracy, where the syllable -ra- has a schwa sound.

    • How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3 contains high-frequency word instruction as part of various lesson plans. However, it is not certain that all students will be taught these words.

Some tasks and questions are sequenced to the application of grade-level work (e.g., application of prefixes at the end of the unit/year; decoding multi-syllable words). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 174, the materials include the sequence of word study skills covered in each grade.

  • The Student Workbook provides opportunities for regular written tasks, word study exercise, and the creation of Super Sentences. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans Module 1, Lesson 2, students add the suffixes -ed and -ing to base words. When assigned a written response, the teacher states, “Add suffixes to your base words.”

Some assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year to inform instructional adjustments of phonics, word recognition, and word analysis to help students make progress toward mastery. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 36 includes an Assessment Plan: Grades 2-5. This provides details of the assessment plan for Grades 2-5, including the types of assessments, the frequency of the assessments, and the strategy for administering and scoring the assessments.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, students complete a Word Study Assessment that is scored with the Spelling Tool, Grades 3-5, Appendix B (page 564) and Written Response Assessment that is scored with the Written Response Rubric, Appendix A (page 561). This assessment pattern repeats weekly.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 20, the teacher is guided to choose a mixture of 15 base words and words with suffixes. The text states that, for students who score 11 correct or fewer on the assessment, the teacher should consider using the Spelling Tool, Grades 3-5, to analyze the student’s spelling performance and determine skill progression over time.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 22, the different assessments included in the materials are addressed. In K-3, the assessments include Informal Decoding Inventory: Short Vowels through Vowel Teams, and Informal Decoding Inventory: Multisyllabic Words. There is no certainty that all students will be assessed with these materials.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 38, the text includes an Informal Decoding Inventory. The inventory “includes six subtests that progress in difficulty. The first five address single-syllable decoding; the last addresses multisyllabic decoding.” Subtests include short vowels, consonant blends and digraphs, r-controlled vowel patterns, vowel-consonant-e, vowel teams, and multisyllabic words. There is no certainty that all students will be assessed with these materials.

Indicator 1O
01/02

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply grade-level phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1o.

The Grade 3 materials include limited opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills independently in connected tasks. Students have opportunities to decode while using some explicitly taught word recognition and analysis strategies; however, these opportunities are often in isolation rather than with connected text. While connected texts are included in the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, the texts do not directly relate to the word recognition and analysis skills being taught and do not contain words related to that focus. The Differentiated Instruction Block can be used to address skills students are missing; however, it is not guaranteed that all students will receive differentiated instruction.

Limited opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to learn, practice, and apply phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills in connected tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 11, the class reads Fudge-a-Mania. Before reading the first chapter, the students hear the teacher introduce anticipation and relax.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 21, students work with vowel teams such as /ea/ and /au/ lead _ and cause._ Students study vowel teams plus -ed, such as led and caused, and vowel teams plus -ing, such as leading and causing. After the teacher explains doubling with multisyllabic words with accented final syllables, students practice the words create, lead, and protect.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 33, the teacher asks a student to pick two words from page 17 of the text they are reading. The words should have more than one syllable. Students divide the words into syllables and label the syllable types.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 21, before students read the text chorally and with partners, the teacher introduces the vocabulary words stubborn and doubtful. The teacher guides students to analyze the types of syllables in these words to better read and spell the words. Students create Super Sentences using the vocabulary words taught during the lesson.

Materials include some tasks and questions that provide opportunities for students to access different foundational skills within the anchor text and supporting texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 27, the teacher asks students to use the words orphans and recognize in Super Sentences. Students can choose to capture key details from today’s reading in the sentences, or they can choose to write a sentence using a different topic.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 21, students create Super Sentences using the newly taught vocabulary words. It is not explicitly stated that these sentences must connect to or reflect the study of the anchor or supporting texts.

  • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 50, the text states, “Students build on their single-syllable pattern knowledge to spell multisyllabic words beginning in grade 3.” The routine explains how students can decode, read and sort by syllabication type. This routine does not discuss students using these strategies when reading multisyllabic words in context.

  • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 68, the text states, “The goal of our Shared Reading is that students apply them (foundational skills) with teacher and peer scaffolding in more and more complex, authentic text.”

  • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 76, the text states, “They (students with foundational skills deficits) will still benefit from Shared Reading, though, because they will be building background knowledge, specific vocabulary knowledge, grammatical knowledge, and text structure knowledge. Decide what is the most challenging task they can accomplish during choral reading (e.g., trace the text with a finger as the teacher reads, or whisper read at a pace slightly behind the teacher, as an echo). Then decide how to release slightly more responsibility to them during partner rereading.”

Indicator 1P
01/02

Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in order to read with purpose and understanding.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1p.

The Grade 3 materials include opportunities for students to read texts with purpose and understanding. Students engage in reading a variety of high-quality prose, but there are missed opportunities for reading poetry. Texts are often read chorally by the class, followed by partner reading. Students are not provided opportunities to read texts independently. Students can hear fluent reading modeled for them by the teacher; however, the concept of fluency is not directly addressed or explicitly taught. There is no evidence in the materials that students silently read in a meaningful way or that teachers systematically monitor individual fluency and accuracy during the Shared Reading Lesson Plans. Materials provide many opportunities for students to read authentic text, but the materials do not provide explicit instruction and assessment in fluency to the entire class. The Differentiated Instruction Block can address some missing fluency skills per student; however, differentiated instruction is not guaranteed for every student.

Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy and fluency in oral reading fluency. Students have no opportunities for silent reading in the core materials.

  • Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 31, students engage in reading activities with Because of Winn Dixie. Students chorally read with teacher guidance and then move in partner reading, either choral reading with a partner or reading alternate pages. Throughout the whole-class reading, the teacher stops and discusses key comprehension components. Additionally, the teacher provides a partner focus and has discussion questions prepared in the lesson.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 45, the teacher says to partners, “As you reread Chapter 7 in partners, think about why the author might have chosen to write about Ruth Bader Ginsburg. What might she have wanted her readers to learn from Ruth’s life story? If you and your partner finish your reread of these chapters, discuss the ‘Jump in the Think Tank’ questions on page 40.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 19, the teacher says, “As you reread today’s section in partners, think about why the author chose to end the story where he did.”

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, in the “Understanding the DI Block Manual” section, the text explains the structures that advance students from letter names and sounds to proficient decoding to fluent and independent oral reading to competent, independent silent reading. Because this is a differentiated instruction lesson, there is no certainty that all students will receive this opportunity.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 206, in the Targeting Fluency and Comprehension lessons, there is a chart that assists teachers in planning for reading instruction and explains when to use choral, partner, and whisper reading. Because this is a differentiated instruction lesson, there is no certainty that all students will receive this opportunity.

Materials support limited reading of prose and poetry with attention to rate, accuracy, and expression, as well as direction for students to apply reading skills when productive struggle is necessary. Poetry is not included. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Read grade-level prose and poetry orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, the first page lists all the texts used for Shared Reading, including multiple prose examples for successive readings. Poetry is not included in these.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 32, the students chorally read and then partner-read ten pages from Because of Winn Dixie.

    • In the 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 59, the text details a set of routines for Shared Reading that combine “evidence based practices for developing text fluency and comprehension.” The oral reading protocols require teachers to create purposeful student pairs which have a “relatively more fluent student paired with a relatively less fluent student.” The routine followed includes students spending two to three minutes discussing their answers to the written response from the previous day. The teacher “sets a purpose for reading and begins choral reading. The teacher’s voice should not be too loud and the teacher’s reading rate and intonation should be natural.”

Materials support students’ fluency development of reading skills (e.g., self-correction of word recognition and/or for understanding, focus on rereading) over the course of the year (to get to the end of the grade-level band). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as necessary.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 39, the class chorally reads a section of the text. After reading page 36, the teacher says, “Sometimes when I see a new word, I can infer its meaning from context. We learned that accuse means to say that someone did something wrong. I see that root word in the word accusation. I know that sometimes suffixes change part of speech. I can infer that an accusation is what a person says when accusing another person. So now I know that impeachment also means when someone accuses the president.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 24, the teacher asks students to look at page 96 of the text and states, “Based on the context, what do you think the word instruments mean?” Students look at page 101 and the teacher states, “Based on the context, what do you think the word accurate means?”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 38, the teacher engages in a think aloud to model the strategy of confirming or self-correcting as your read, rereading as necessary. The teacher stops during the choral reading and states, “That didn’t make sense to me. I need to self-monitor. The text says that Sonia could stay in this job forever because federal judges were appointed for life. It didn’t make sense because I know from the introduction of this book that Sonia Sotomayor becomes one of the nine Supreme Court justices. So I’ll have to read on to see how it all happens.”

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Targeting Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition, FIGURE 4.10, Coaching Template for Using Letter Patterns, the text suggests that teachers implement one minute of decoding practice where the teacher distributes word cards and asks children to read the words in a whisper voice. If they finish, they can reread. Because this is a differentiated instruction lesson, there is no certainty that all students will receive this opportunity.

Assessment materials provide teachers and students with limited information of students’ current fluency skills and provide teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery of fluency. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The 2-5 Teacher Manual, page 36 lists an Assessment Plan for Grades 2-5. It includes an oral reading fluency assessment that monitors words correct in one minute and identifies students’ risk status.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 37, Figure 6.4, Checklist for Targeting Fluency and Comprehension, the text lists fluency benchmarks to assess students’ fluency instruction. For K-3, the Test of Oral Reading Fluency is for determining the speed and accuracy of reading aloud grade-level text.

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

Across the program, some texts are organized around knowledge-building topical units, though most are organized around a theme. Students have opportunities to analyze key ideas and details and the integration of knowledge and ideas within and across texts, though their opportunities to analyze craft and structure are limited. In the ELA units, students complete Culminating Tasks, which sometimes require them to use texts and/or knowledge from the Shared Reading lessons. These Culminating Tasks are written in nature and sometimes incorporate research skills, but the focus is on applying the traits of informative writing rather than building students’ research skills. Materials include a standards coverage document that indicates how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules. The majority of instruction across the year falls within grade-level aligned standards, but materials do not address all of the grade-level standards. Materials also provide documentation for flexible schedules that indicate how to implement Bookworms on a reduced schedule, but there is no guidance as to how students would master all grade-level standards if lessons were omitted.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

14/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

In Shared Reading, some texts are organized around a topic, while others are organized around a theme. In ELA, units often build knowledge about text structures. Although students have many opportunities to analyze key ideas and details through questions and retell opportunities, students have limited opportunities to analyze craft and structure within texts and across texts. Throughout the materials, students have opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge both within individual texts and across multiple texts. Students complete culminating tasks in ELA, though some require students to use texts and/or knowledge from Shared Reading. Culminating tasks rarely integrate speaking and listening and heavily focus on language standards. Although materials cover a year’s worth of writing instruction, materials do not thoroughly address all of the writing grade-level standards throughout the year. There are minimal lessons throughout both ELA and Shared Reading that support students in growing their research skills. Students do not conduct research to answer a question; rather, the research task focuses on ensuring students can identify, evaluate, and apply traits of informative writing. Some of the research projects are culminating tasks and do not help build students’ research skills.

Indicator 2A
02/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.

In both the Shared Reading and ELA modules, some units are organized around topics to build knowledge, while others are organized around a theme; however, some units are not cohesively organized to build knowledge or do not build knowledge on the intended topics. In ELA, units often build knowledge around text structures. Text sets within each unit typically include three texts, with some units including one or two texts. Some units do not have any texts. The limited volume of texts and varying number of lessons for each text could impede students’ ability to build knowledge.

Some texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Unit 2, texts are connected by the topic of the United States government. Students read two informative books, The Constitution of the United States and The Congress of the United States, both by Christine Taylor-Butler.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 1, students read texts about geology. Texts include Soil by Christin Ditchfield, Minerals, Rocks, and Soil by Barbara J. Davis, and Magic Tree House Fact Checker: Twisters and Other Terrible Storms by Will Osborne and Mary Pope Osborne.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 3, students continue to study narrative text structures. Students listen to the following texts: Lon Po Po: A Red Riding Hood Story from China by Ed Young and American Tall Tales by Mary Pope Osbourne.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Unit 2, students continue learning about the elements of biographies as they learn about two famous individuals in United States’ history. Texts in this unit include Harvesting Hope: The Story of Cesar Chavez by Kathleen Krull and Snowflake Bentley by Jacqueline Briggs Martin.

Some texts are connected by a theme. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Unit 1, texts are connected by the theme “Life’s Lessons.” Students “read about characters learning important life lessons as they progress through stories.” Texts in this unit include Owen Foote, Money Man by Stephanie Green and Fudge-A-Mania by Judy Blume.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Unit 2, students explore the theme, “Journey to the Past” to understand how ancient civilizations influence our world today. Texts include _Ancient Greece _by Sandra Newman and Here Lies the Librarian by Richard Peck.

Some texts are not connected to a grade-appropriate cohesive topic or a theme. Examples include, but are not limited, to:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 1, students discuss the theme, “Patterns in Our World” and explore new concepts, such as latitude, longitude, elevation, and contour lines. Students listen to the texts Maps and Globes by Jack Knowlton, A Drop Around the World by Barbara Shaw McKinney, and What Is a Biome? by Bobbie Kalman. The unit overview indicates that students will “learn that authors need to do research in order to write informative texts” but the lessons connected to the texts do not address that skill, nor are the texts built around a common topic or text structure. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Unit 3, students are exploring both the theme of injustice and realistic fiction as they read Shiloh by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor and writing an opinion piece about injustice. The unit overview indicates that students learn how the same theme can be expressed in multiple texts, though the materials miss opportunities to embed multiple texts about injustice into the reading of Shiloh. Students also read a narrative, but write an opinion piece, which leads to a lack of cohesion within the unit.

Indicator 2B
02/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.

Within the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, students have some opportunities to analyze key ideas and details; however, materials provide few opportunities for students to analyze craft and structure within individual texts and across multiple texts. At times, the questions and tasks that students respond to do not fully align to their correlated standard.

For some texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 33, before reading Who Is Sonia Sotomayor? by Megan Stine, lesson guidance prompts students to identify key details. Discussion questions include: “How does Sonia react to living with diabetes and the fact that she might not live very long? Why does school become easier for Sonia? Why does the Sotomayer family move? Why was Sonia’s acceptance into all three Ivy League schools a big deal?” After discussing the questions, students work with the teacher to create an anchor chart sharing the important events from Sonia Sotomayer’s high school years. Although students recount key details from the text, students do not determine the main idea of the text or explain how the key details they identified support the main idea.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 17, students chorally read The Boy Who Harnessed The Wind by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer to identify and describe the main character. Students complete the following assignment, “Choose a strong character trait to describe William. We came up with a lot between yesterday and today. Give reasons why you chose that trait. Use evidence from the text to support your thinking.” Although students describe characters in the story, they do not “explain how their actions contribute to the sequence of events.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 8, after listening to the first part of Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl, the teacher and student respond together to a prompt about character traits. While reading, the class makes a chart to keep track of the details from the text that may help them understand what experiences and influences make Roald Dahl the writer he was. Students start with a character trait to describe Roald’s Dahl’s father and then speculate how that might have influenced him later. The teacher then provides a sentence frame to help students craft their response to the prompt: “Roald Dahl’s father was ____, and this may have influenced him to ______.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 2, students answer questions about key details in Rosa by Nikki Giovanni. During the Interactive Read Aloud, the teacher pauses and asks questions such as, “Why is the bus driver yelling at the passengers? Why did Rosa sit back down?” “Why did Rosa pay and then get off of the bus from the rear?” “If a white passenger enters the bus, what will happen now that all of the seats are full? Why?” After reading, the teacher models writing a response to the following prompt: “How is Rosa’s bus ride home similar to and different from your bus ride home?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 16, the teacher models how to summarize key ideas into a larger written piece about a key idea. After reading a biography about Snowflake Bentley, the teacher models writing a response to the following prompt: “Help me summarize how Willie would capture the snow crystals and then photograph them.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 10, students listen to Pinduli by Janell Cannon. Students respond to the following prompt during a class discussion, “Is there a lesson for us all? Who can suggest a moral for this story?” Then the teacher explains, “We have to notice that authors write stories that can teach us life lessons. Sometimes we call those lessons themes. They are not the events in a story, but they are ways to apply the events to real events in our lives.” Although students determine the moral of the story, they do not “explain how it is conveyed through key details in the text.”

For most texts, students do not analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 41, after reading Who is Sonia Sotomayer by Megan Stine, students prepare to read The Story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Biography Book for New Readers by Susan B. Katz. The teacher begins by addressing the text structure of the book ,telling students the book is a biography and is organized in a unique way. Students look at the table of contents to see how the author organized the book in chronological order, and the teacher shares that the chapter titles “give you an idea of what events in Ruth’s life fall within each chapter.” The teacher then reviews the glossary and the bibliography of the text. The students preview chapter 1 and discuss the chapter number, title, and text features that help readers, including subtitles and bold print. The teacher reviews maps, text boxes, sidebars, timelines, and picture diagrams. After reading chapter 1, students discuss how the author in the last text used two timelines to show what was happening in Sonia’s life and what was happening in the world during her lifetime, while the author of this text used one timeline to show both. Students then discuss the following questions: “Why do you think the author chose to begin this biography by writing the ‘Meet Ruth Bader Ginsburg’’ section? What was her purpose for writing this section? Why do you think the author chose to include what was going on in Europe in 1941?”

Indicator 2C
02/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.

Students have some opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge both within individual texts and across multiple texts. During both Shared Reading and ELA, the teacher pauses multiple times to ask students questions to help build knowledge. Although students have several opportunities in each module in both ELA and Shared Reading to analyze knowledge across multiple texts, there are instances in which the sequence of questions students answer or the task students complete does not align to the integration of knowledge and ideas standards.

Some sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, students begin choral reading Owen Foote, Money Man by Stephanie Greene. Students then engage in a discussion about the following questions: “Why do you think Kate was nicer to Owen than Lydia was?”; “What additional information do we get from the illustration on page 8?”; and “What is the author telling us at the bottom of page 9 when the text says, ‘She looked at the expression on Lydia’s face. ‘Not that you ever think of it,’ she finished weakly.’” Although students examine an illustration, it is unclear whether students explain how the illustration contributes to what the words in the story convey “(e.g., create mood, emphasize aspects of a character or setting).”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 8, students analyze the meaning of a word in an illustration and how it contributes to the overall section during the Choral Reading section. The teacher models by pausing on page 42: “I can see what a skein is now. The author included this illustration because there were some things she thought we wouldn’t understand. Now I can see why Susan had to stand still holding her hands out so that her grandmother could make a ball of yarn for her knitting. Sometimes we come across words we don’t understand and we can try to guess what they might mean by thinking about what would make sense.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 23, students chorally read Ancient Greece by Sandra Newman. Students used information gained from the illustrations and the words in the text to demonstrate understanding of the text. During choral reading the teacher says, “As I read the list of gods on page 25, I want you to look at the pictures below. This is what the Greeks thought the gods might look like. If I combine information from the text and the illustration, I can infer that the mosaic is showing Odysseus wandering the ocean with his crew.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 18, students participate in an interactive read aloud of The BFG by Roald Dahl and think about how the illustrator adds details to the description of the giant. The teacher says, “In these next two pages, the author describes a new and very different giant. Remember that good readers always try to make mental images of what they’re reading. To do this, they pay attention to details that the author gives them. As I read, listen to the details and try to picture the new giant. Then I will show you the picture drawn by Quentin Blake, who illustrated the book.” As the teacher continues reading, students compare their mental picture to that in the book. Students do not “[e]xplain how specific aspects of a text’s illustrations contribute to what is conveyed by the words in a story (e.g., create mood, emphasize aspects of a character or setting).”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 7, students participate in an interactive read aloud of When Marian Sang by Pam Muñoz Ryan. During the discussion, the teacher asks, “Marian feels that the color of her skin should not matter. And speaking of color, has anyone noticed anything unusual about the illustrations in this book?” and “Why do you think the illustrator chose brown and black as the only colors?” While students are asked to look at an illustration, this does not ask students to gain information from the illustration to better understand the text.

Some sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 20, students finish choral reading Fudge-a-Mania by Judy Blume. Students write a response to the following prompt: “Think about how Peter is feeling in these last two chapters of the book. Our main character seems to have learned an important life lesson in this book, just like Owen in Owen Foote, Money Man. How have Peter’s feelings about spending his summer vacation in Maine with Sheila changed since the beginning of the book? What do you think he has learned?” Additionally, students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the themes, settings, and plots of [the] stories.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 45, students finish choral reading The Story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Biography Book for New Readers by Susan B. Katz. Afterwards, students write a response to the following prompt: “We have read many biographies of inspirational women this year. Today, I would like you to write about how Susan B. Anthony, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are similar. Think not only about their beliefs, opinions, actions, and reactions as you write, but also about their families, experiences, accomplishments, and the challenges that they faced throughout their lives.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans Module 4, Lesson 40, students compare and contrast the themes of Here Lies the Librarian by Richard Peck and Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women Rights by Helen Monsell by answering the following discussion prompt, “Compare and contrast the themes or central messages in Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women’s Rights and in Here Lies the Librarian. How are the themes the same? How are they different?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 18, after participating in an interactive read aloud of The BFG by Roald Dahl, students discuss the following: “So far, we’ve met two giants and they are very, very different. Help me think of some words to describe each one. I want adjectives that are character traits. Think back to the character traits we identified for Owen in Owen Foote, Money Man and for Roald Dahl’s mother and father in Boy: Tales of Childhood. The strong adjectives we come up with today might be a bit different for giants! But who knows, you might be surprised! Let’s make a chart. I’ll get us started.” Students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the themes, settings, and plots of stories written by the same author about the same or similar characters (e.g., in books from a series).”

Indicator 2D
02/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.

Materials include culminating tasks at the end of the ELA Lesson Plans modules that require students to use and build knowledge from both the ELA and Shared Reading lessons. Culminating tasks typically require students to use the texts they have read throughout the module. In lessons leading to the culminating task, students read, write, and engage in partner and whole class discussions; however, the culminating tasks are limited to writing tasks. The culminating tasks rarely integrate speaking and listening, but heavily focus on language standards. Additionally, in Module 4, students reflect on themselves as a leader through a narrative writing piece but do not integrate what they learned in the module; students can successfully complete the culminating task without demonstrating knowledge of the Module 4 topic and texts. 

Culminating tasks are evident, but are not varied across the year and are sometimes multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual provides information about the culminating tasks and explains, “We locate them in ELA because they are a good match to the structures of our community of writers. We have planned tasks that require listening, speaking, reading, and writing. They are not independent performance tasks. They involve teacher scaffolding and peer support and collaboration. Lessons continue to include teacher modeling, student work sessions, and a sharing of daily progress.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 33–40, students write an opinion piece about character traits that brings together what they have learned in both the ELA and Shared Reading lessons. Students will use the text, The BFG by Roald Dahl, along with a graphic organizer to plan and write an opinion paragraph about their selected character. Throughout the lessons, the teacher models how to write an opinion piece and students work independently, in partnerships, and as a whole class to support their thinking. The introduction to the task explains, “This Culminating Task will take eight days to complete. First, students will learn about the structure and purpose of opinion writing and how to evaluate the quality of opinion writing. Then, they will apply what they have learned about opinion writing, elements of narrative text, and character traits to collaboratively plan and write an opinion text about the book, The BFG.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 18–25, students write an informative biography research report that brings together what they have learned across multiple lessons. Students read multiple biographies to learn the structure of an informative piece, then will research a historical figure. Throughout the lessons, the teacher models how to write an informative piece and students work independently, in partnerships, and as a whole class to support their thinking. The introduction to the task explains, “This Culminating Task will take eight days to complete. Students will apply what they have learned about informative writing and the elements and structure of biography writing to plan and write a biography research report on one of the historical figures featured within the Shared Reading and Read-Aloud texts from this module. Successful completion of this task allows students to use writing to demonstrate their literacy skills, knowledge of informative structure, and ability to incorporate information from multiple sources into their own biography writing.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 36–40, students write a narrative piece about how their reading and writing identity has changed over the course of the year. This does not have direct connections to previous Shared Reading or ELA lessons, though the materials indicate that this task incorporates what was learned previously. The introduction to the task explains, “This Culminating Task will take 5 days to complete. In this task, students will reinforce their understanding of the structure and purpose of narrative writing. Within this structure, they will incorporate what they’ve learned about narrative text structure from books across the curriculum this year in both Shared Reading and Read Aloud lessons and apply what they’ve learned about the structure and purpose of narrative writing and personal narrative writing techniques, to independently plan, write, revise, and edit a personal narrative of how they have grown and changed as a reader and a writer this year.”

Indicator 2E
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.

Materials provide a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the year. The Teacher Manual describes the process teachers take students through for each writing piece, which includes teacher modeling; whole class, small group, and individual practice; and direct application in student writing pieces. Each module includes opportunities for students to learn to write in various genres, some of which are longer Culminating Tasks and others are shorter writing tasks. Students have multiple opportunities to write in each text type over the course of a year, and the materials support teachers in helping students make connections to previously completed writing to build writing skills over time. Each task includes a rubric and student-facing checklists to guide the writing process and allow teachers to assess students’ writing over time.

Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual explains the program’s approach to writing instruction: “In summary, our approach to writing instruction includes cycles within and across the three genres and within and across grade levels.” To produce independent writers, the writing instruction includes the following steps:

    • “1. Learn to evaluate the genre 

    •  2. Learn to plan with a graphic organizer 

    •  3. Learn to draft from an organizer 

    •  4. Learn to revise with a checklist 

    •  5. Learn to edit and share”

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual outlines the program’s writing instruction structures. During the Modeling routine, the teacher models how to evaluate writing genre, plan and draft writing using a genre-specific graphic organizer, and revise and edit writing using genre- and grade-specific checklists. During the Work Session routine, students work individually, in pairs, or in small groups to create a daily work product. This routine also includes time for the teacher to confer with individuals or groups of students. During the final routine, Sharing, students have an opportunity to share their accomplishments with their peers. This routine also “builds students’ ability to reflect on their growing skills as writers and to set goals for improvement.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, there are eight lessons on opinion writing. These lessons build towards the culminating task, during which students “plan and write a collaborative opinion text about character traits in the book, The BFG” by Roald Dahl. There are three lessons on informative writing. Students use texts, such as Boy: Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl and The Constitution of the United States by Christine Taylor- Butler, to identify the key elements of informative writing. There are five lessons on narrative writing. Students learn about the key elements of narrative writing and write a personal narrative. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, there are three lessons on opinion writing. Students write a book review on one of two ELA texts read that week: The Keeping Quilt by Patricia Polacco and Grandfather’s Journey by Allen Say. There are ten lessons on informative writing. During these lessons which build to the culminating task, students determine whether texts are informative, evaluate informative texts to determine which is stronger, use evidence from texts read to write a research report on minerals and rocks. There are five lessons on narrative writing. These lessons build to the culminating task, during which students write an alternate ending to the tall tale “Febold Feboldson” (author not cited). 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, there are five lessons on opinion writing. The lessons prepare students for the culminating task, during which students “support their opinions about injustice with reasons and evidence from the Read-Aloud text, Shiloh [by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor], from personal experience, or by presenting a counter-argument.” There are eight lessons on informative writing. During these lessons which prepare students for the culminating task, students “apply what they have learned about informative writing and the elements and structure of biography writing to plan and write a biography research report on one of the historical figures featured within the Shared Reading and Read-Aloud texts from this module.” This module does not contain lessons on narrative writing. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, there are five lessons on opinion writing. During these lessons that lead to the culminating task, students “incorporate concepts and knowledge learned from books across the curriculum this year in both Shared Reading and Read Aloud lessons, and apply what they've learned about the structure and purpose of opinion writing to independently plan, write and design, revise, and edit a book advertisement.” There are 15 lessons on narrative writing. During the first ten lessons which lead to a culminating task, students learn about adaptations and write an adaptation of Pinduli by Janell Cannon. During the last five lessons which lead to a second culminating task, students “create a personal narrative that reflects on their growth as a reader and a writer at the beginning, middle, and end of their third-grade school year.” 

Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual includes the following teacher guidance to support writing instruction planning and preparation: “To understand how we distribute attention across evaluating, planning, drafting, revising, and editing and how we distribute attention across opinion, narrative, and informational writing, it helps to view the writing lessons as a continuous set, skipping the read alouds that build content and language knowledge between writing lessons.” Provided guidance also suggests that teachers “plan for the sequence of connected writing lessons at the same time.” 

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual outlines the design of culminating tasks, which provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge they gained during the Shared Reading and ELA modules. Culminating tasks, which are located at or near the end of each module, include several components to support teachers with implementation. The components are the same for each culminating task across all modules with guidance tailored to match the specific writing genre of focus. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, the Module 2 culminating task includes the following guidance:

    • Narrative Writing: Tall Tale Alternate Ending: this section includes assessment notes instructing teachers to collect this piece of writing for a grade to be evaluated using the Grade 3 Module 2 Rubric: Tall Tale Alternate Ending and the Grade 3 Editing and Revision Rubric. Guidance also suggests that teachers “compar[e] this writing to students’ baseline narrative writing pieces to determine progress over time.”

    • Curriculum Connections: this section explains how the culminating task writing lessons “support students in making connections to what they have learned so far in lessons across the curriculum.” Materials list the applicable lessons, as well as the details of the curriculum connection made.

    • Introduction: this section states how many days or lessons needed for the culminating task and explicitly states what the culminating task. Guidance also explains what successful completion of the task entails. 

    • Building Knowledge: this section explains how the texts students read in the Shared Reading and ELA modules prepared them for the work they will complete during the culminating task. 

    • Building Skills: this section explains how the daily written response tasks and completion of text structure anchor charts enable students to successfully complete the culminating task.

    • Demonstrating Knowledge and Skills: this section outlines how embedded supports, such as graphic organizers, various grouping strategies for collaboration and discussion, and checklists, allow students to transition through each stage of the writing process. 

    • Materials: this section outlines the materials needed for each lesson

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual describes the tools provided to evaluate student writing. “First, we have standards-aligned, genre-specific rubrics for narratives, opinions, and information texts…. We also have rubrics for teachers at each grade level to help them evaluate mechanics.” When applicable, lessons state the rubric or checklist needed. The teacher can access these assessment resources in the Checklist tab and the Rubrics tab located within the ELA Lesson Plans. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 11, the Modeling section of the lesson plans includes a picture of the graphic organizer needed to support students with planning and writing their story adaptations. The graphic organizer model includes the following sections: Topic, including Introduction: character, setting, interesting detail; Event 1; Event 2 (Repeat as many times as needed); Conclusion: lasting feeling for reader.

Indicator 2F
02/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.

While materials provide opportunities for students to engage in research projects within some of the Culminating Tasks, research skills do not progress over time or increase in rigor. The focus within the Culminating Task is the process of writing rather than explicit, extended instruction on research skills. During the research projects, students use what they have learned about topics from texts read in previous Shared Reading or ELA lessons in addition to additional research about topics from text- or web-based research. In most cases, students do not conduct research to answer a question; rather, the research task focuses on ensuring students can identify, evaluate, and apply traits of informative writing. The support for teachers focuses mainly on modeling how to organize the information students find and writing the research reports.

Some research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Recall information from experiences or gather information from print and digital sources; take brief notes on sources and sort evidence into provided categories. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 16–25, the teacher models gathering information from the Shared Reading texts, Soil by Christin Ditchfield and Minerals, Rocks, and Soil by Barbara J. Davis, and adding information to the graphic organizer for a rocks and minerals research project. The teacher uses sticky notes and models writing information from the text on the sticky note and then adding to the graphic organizer. The teacher models using their planning notes in the graphic organizer to write a research report on minerals and rocks.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 18–25, the teacher models using a graphic organizer along with the Shared Reading text, Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women’s Rights by Helen Albee Monsell, to plan and write a biography research report.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 21–30, the teacher models researching the Greek goddess, Aphrodite, using the Shared Reading text Ancient Greece by Sandra Newman. The teacher models note taking, including adding items such as a diagram or sketch, in a graphic organizer. The teacher displays sample infographics and models using one of the samples to plan their own infographic about Aphrodite. The teacher uses think alouds during modeling to demonstrate how to rearrange their sticky notes to organize their thoughts. The teacher models replacing placeholders in their plan with images and words.

Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic via provided resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, lesson 23, the teacher materials include a potential scaffold for students to translate their graphic organizer into drafted writing: “For students who need more support, consider providing the sentence frame: What do you think when you hear the word (mineral or rock)? I think (describe what you think). A (mineral or rock) is (define). A (mineral or rock) has (change verb to fit subtopics) (chose 2 or 3 subtopics).”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 21, students begin researching Greek gods in order to create an infographic. The teacher says to students, “Today you will have an opportunity to do this. You will add to your graphic organizer from new sources for the entire writing time today. You will search through the websites listed up here (or the resources provided here) and take notes on your graphic organizer. Materials provide two websites to support students with their research.

Materials provide opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Conduct short research projects that build knowledge about a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 16–25, students use a graphic organizer along with information from the Shared Reading texts, Soil by Christin Ditchfield and Minerals, Rocks, and Soil by Barbara J. Davis, to plan and write a research report on minerals and rocks.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 20, during the culminating task, students use a graphic organizer to plan and write a biography research report on one of the individuals they learned about in the Module. Students must use information from one of the Module texts, as well as information from another source to write their report.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 21–30, students research Greek Gods and create an Ancient Greece Infographic. Students “research a topic using multiple sources and plan to share information about a topic by taking notes on a graphic organizer.” Students then “replace the notes and ideas on their graphic organizer with information and images as they begin drafting their infographic.”

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

04/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Instruction throughout the materials focuses on content that falls within grade-level aligned standards; however, materials do not address all of the grade-level standards. Most writing standards encompass explicit instruction, tasks, and assessed skills, but speaking and listening opportunities are limited. Materials include a standards coverage document in the Appendix of the Teacher Manual, which allows the teacher to see how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules. Materials include 180 lessons in ELA and 180 lessons in Shared Reading. While this could conceivably be completed in a school year, there is no time allotted for interruptions to the school year or reteaching. Core learning takes place during the Shared Reading and ELA blocks, for a total of 90 minutes a day, but some tasks from those blocks must be finished during the Differentiated Instruction block. Materials also provide flexible schedule documentation, though it is unclear whether students would master all standards if lessons were omitted.

Indicator 2G
02/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.

While materials list the standards addressed with the lesson or within a section of the lesson, there are, at times, upwards of 20 standards listed for a given lesson. Materials do not indicate how a teacher might know what the priority or focus standard might be and leave it up to teacher discretion to determine which instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments align to the standards listed. Outside of the writing rubrics that accompany the culminating tasks and some other smaller tasks throughout the year, there is no mechanism for the teacher to determine whether students have mastered a standard. Additionally, the Bookworms 2–5 manual states that the materials do not contain a system or sequence for standards mastery. Materials provide a scope and sequence document, which states the genre of reading or writing and the standards covered in each lesson. The materials include a standards coverage document in the Appendix of the Teacher Manual, which allows the teacher to see how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules.

Over the course of each unit, some instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Appendix of the Bookworms 2-5 Teacher Manual, the materials provide the standards by lesson for both the Shared Reading and ELA lessons, but it is unclear which standards listed are the priority and to which part of the instruction they align.

  • Materials are organized by module, unit, and lesson. Each lesson includes a list of standards addressed. The Shared Reading Lesson Plans list the standards at the beginning of each section. The ELA Lesson Plans list the standards at the beginning of each lesson.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 11, materials indicate that one of the standards addressed in the Text Engagement section of the lesson is RL.3.6 “Distinguish their own point of view from that of the narrator or those of the characters.” The teacher script is as follows: “Fudge-a-Mania is a text about Peter, the main character, who is convinced his vacation with the Tubman family will be the worst experience ever. As the story continues, you will see if Peter has a change in attitude about vacation.” This does not address the standard, nor does the focus for the lesson, as the lesson centers on author’s craft: “Our author, Judy Blume, creates anticipation during these first two chapters. Look for things that make us think ahead, and be excited to read further. What does she hint about, but not really say yet?” It is unclear where Rl.3.6 is addressed in the instructional portion of the lesson.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 2, students read The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane by Kate Di Camillo. Under the Word Study section, the following standards are listed: L.3.2f, L.3.4c, L.3.6, RF.3.3c, RF.3.4 and SL.3.1. The teacher provides instruction on the definition of indignation. For example, the teacher says,“Excruciating is an adjective that means very painful. You could have an excruciating injury, or you could listen to an excruciating discussion. The pain can be real pain or it can be a painful or sad feeling. No one wants to feel any excruciating pain!” It is unclear which standard this instruction aligns to. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, students write a personal narrative. Materials list W.3.3.a, W.3.3.b, W.3.3.c, and W.3.5 as the standards addressed within the lesson. The teacher models how to use a graphic organizer to plan out the various components of a narrative, which is based on what is expressed in narrative writing standards.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 21, students conduct research for an informative writing task. Materials list W.3.2.b, W.3.7, and W.3.8 as the standards addressed within the lesson. The teacher models how to take notes from sources when conducting research, which aligns to W.3.8, although this is not explicitly stated within the materials. 

Over the course of each unit, some questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual describes how questions in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans are sequenced to increase in complexity throughout the text and over time: “But the common design element is that the questions are carefully sequenced every day to generate a rich representation of the meaning of that day’s segments. Because the texts themselves are more difficult over time, answering the gist-level inferential questions requires increased comprehension competence across texts.” While each section of the Shared Reading Lesson Plans lists standards, it is unclear which standards the discussion questions students answer refer to. The ELA Lesson Plans have a similar design in that the standards addressed in the lesson are listed at the beginning but it is unclear which particular tasks are aligned to those standards.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 2, the materials list L.3.6, RF.3.4.a, RF.3.4.c, RL.3.1, RL.3.3, RL.3.5, RL.3.10, and SL.3.1 as standards being addressed in the Text Engagement section of the lesson. That portion of the lesson encompasses multiple parts, making it unclear which standards align to the discussion questions. Discussion questions include: “Why do you think Kate was nicer to Owen than Lydia was?  Why do you think Joseph’s mother really gave Kitty away?  Reread the end of the chapter. What do you think about Owen’s change from kindergarten to 3rd grade?”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 1, the materials list L.3.6, RF.3.F.a, RF.3.4.c, RL.3.1, RL.3.6, RL.3.10, and SL.3.1 as standards being addressed in the Text Engagement section of the lesson. It is unclear which standard aligns to each discussion question. Students respond to the following discussion questions: “What does Edward look like?  Why is he unhappy with his whiskers?  What do we learn from the description of Edward’s wardrobe? How did Edward spend his days? How did he feel about Abilene’s parents? Why does he feel differently about Pellegrina?  What adjectives would you use to describe Edward? How does the author provide us a cliffhanger at the end of Chapter 2?”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 15, the materials list L.3.1.a, L.3.1.b, L.3.1.h, L.3.1.i, L.3.4, L.3.5, L.3.6, RL.3.1, RL.3.5, RL.3.6, and W.3.2 but where those standards fall within the lesson is not explicitly stated, leaving the teacher to assume. At times, it seems that some questions do not fully align to potential correlated standards. Discussion questions include:  “Now it’s your turn to ask questions. Think of a really good question about what we’ve read today and ask your partner.”; “What are the most important ideas?”; “If we connect these two ideas with the word and, what do we have? What if I wanted to connect with after?”; “Which event comes first?”; “Does it make sense to say ‘After shining fiery hot over the great yellow wasteland, the sun had come up.’ Or should it be ‘After the sun had come up, it was shining fiery hot over the great yellow wasteland.’?”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 10, students read Pinduli by Janell Cannon. Materials list the following standards: L.3.1a, L.3.1h, L.3.1i, L.3.4, L.3.6, RL.3.1, RL.3.2, RL.3.5, RL.3.6, and W.3.1. For the discussion section, students answer the following question, “Is there a lesson for us all? Who can suggest a moral for this story?” It is unclear which standard from the provided list that this question aligns to.

Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual describes how the materials provide standards-based writing rubrics that use the language of the standards to assess student writing.

    • Shared Reading Lesson Plans include assessment opportunities every five days. 

      • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 30, students write a response to the following prompt: “Reread pages 38–42 and decide which amendment seems most important to you. Explain why and give reasons for your opinion. Then, think about something that could be changed at our school that could be better. What do you think would be important to change and why? Give reasons to support your opinion.” Standards indicated for this assignment include RI.3.1, RI.3.7, W.3.1, W.3.8, and W.3.1a. Materials provide a written response rubric containing two categories: accuracy and evidence.  

      • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 30, students complete a written response to the following prompt:  “We recently took some time to think about the structure of the biographies.  A Picture Book of Frederick Douglass and Susan B. Anthony: Champion of Women’s Rights, and the choices the authors made to share information with us.  Think about how the author has told this story.  What did she do to make it interesting?  What specific choices did she make?” Standards indicated for this assignment include RI.3.6, RI.3.7, W.3.1, W.3.8, and W.3.10. Materials provide a written response rubric containing two categories: accuracy and evidence. 

    • ELA Lesson Plans include an informative writing rubric, an opinion writing rubric, and a narrative writing rubric. Materials also include a separate editing and revision rubric addressing capitalization, punctuation, grammar, spelling, and word choice.

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, the Personal Narrative Overview includes the Narrative Writing Rubric, which assesses students on story elements, narrative techniques, temporal words, and a conclusion, which are the elements described in W.3.3 “Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, descriptive details, and clear event sequences.” Throughout this culminating task, students refer to the Narrative Writing Checklist. The checklist translates the language of the standard into more student-friendly language.

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, the Opinion Writing Overview includes the Exposing Injustice Rubric, which assesses students on content knowledge, literacy knowledge, and integration of knowledge and ideas. The teacher also assesses student’s writing using an editing and revising rubric.  

    • Materials include a speaking and listening rubric for individual student evaluation. The rubric addresses collaboration, comprehension, participation, description, and oral expression. Standards indicated for this rubric include: SL.3.2, SL.3.3, SL.3.4, and SL.3.6.

By the end of the academic year, some standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Shared Reading and ELA print materials include a Standards Coverage document that indicates which standards are covered in each lesson, allowing teachers to see how standards progress across units and modules, including which standards are repeated over time to allow mastery of the standard. This document is not available in the digital materials at the time of the review. 

  • In the Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual, the materials indicate that there is not a plan for standards mastery at certain intervals, but rather standards are consistently addressed over time in the various components of the program: “Neither do we have a plan for mastery of specific standards at specific marking periods. That only works for foundational skills, and we will address them in the section on DI. You will see that we address many standards each day in Shared Reading. In fact, we see the standards as consistently applied in groups during engaged, grade-level reading and writing tasks, but never fully mastered. The goal of our Shared Reading is that students apply them with teacher and peer scaffolding in more and more complex, authentic text. When you consider all of Bookworms (Shared Reading, ELA, and DI together) you will see that our attention to standards is broad, deep, and relentless.” Materials also note, “Since Bookworms is not designed with a standards-mastery timeline, these students can be fully included in Shared Reading and increase their participation in practicing all standards as their language skills improve.”

  • Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans lack opportunities to address the Speaking and Listening standards. SL 3.1 is addressed in all four ELA Modules. SL 3.2, SL 3.3, SL 3.4, and SL.3.6 are only addressed in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4. Neither the Shared Reading Lesson Plans or the ELA Lesson Plans address SL.3.5.

  • RI.3.6 is addressed within and across the first three Modules of the Shared Reading and the ELA Lesson Plans. The Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans do not address RI.3.6 in Module 4.   

  • RL.3.6 is addressed within and across all four Modules in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and the ELA Lesson Plans.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, RI.3.9 is addressed two times in Module 1, one time in Module 2, five times in Module 3, and one time in Module 4. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, W.3.7 is addressed twice in Module 2, once in Module 3, and twice in Module 4. The Shared Reading Lesson Plans address W.3.7 twice in Module 3.

Indicator 2H
02/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.

Materials provide a general overview of implementation, describing how curriculum components fit into a day; however, materials do not provide a scope and sequence document that details pacing or length of modules and units. Materials indicate that the Shared Reading and ELA lesson plans should work in concert and provide overview documents in the Teacher Manual that show how the Shared Reading and ELA lessons fit together. Each grade level includes 180 Shared Reading lessons and 180 ELA lessons, which does not allow adequate time for interruptions to the school year and reteaching. The materials also provide flexible schedule documentation, though it is unclear whether students would master all standards if lessons were omitted. 

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual states the system is broken into three instructional blocks: Shared Reading; ELA, which consists of interactive read alouds, writing instruction, and culminating tasks; and the Differentiated Instruction block. Each day, the teacher teaches a Shared Reading lesson and an ELA lesson, and provides small group instruction through the Differentiated Instruction block. 

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual includes a scope and sequence document. This document lists the lesson number, reading or writing genre, type of reading or writing, and the standards covered. 

  • In the Bookworms 2-5 Teacher Manual, Planning for Success, the materials provide various flexible schedules for schools with fewer days or planned interruptions. These schedules can reduce the curriculum by either 10 or 20 days, though the impact on students’ mastery of the standards is not addressed.

Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials allot 45 minutes for each instructional block, resulting in a total of two hours and 15 minutes of instruction each day. The Differentiated Instruction block is designed to include time for the teacher to provide small group instruction to three small groups. The materials state, “Each of the 3 blocks of time that we planned for in Bookworms must be 45 minutes long. It will not be possible for teachers to shorten any of them.” 

  • Both Shared Reading and ELA include 170 lessons each, which does not allow time for lessons that may take longer, state testing requirements, local assessments, reteaching, and other general interruptions that schools experience. Materials do not provide information regarding pacing within lessons, including how to be responsive to students’ needs by slowing down or speeding up. It is up to the teacher to determine how long each section of the lesson should take.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 23, the lesson is broken into multiple parts with multiple facets within each part. The Word Study section consists of a spelling lesson. The Text Engagement section consists of Pair-Share Responses, Vocabulary, First Focus, Choral Reading, Discuss Focus, Partner Focus, Discussion, Make Anchor Chart, and Assignments, during which students complete a short writing task. The lesson includes a list of 19 standards addressed. While each part of this lesson appears to be fairly short, depending on the level of student understanding and how they respond to the instruction, the teacher may not be able to cover all of the lesson components in the allotted 45 minutes. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the teacher states, “Today I am going to ask you to plan and write a story on your own. In this story, you will tell the reader about something that happened to you. It could be a story about something that happened to you at home or at school or anywhere. Think about all the things that happened. Then you can plan what you want to write. When you’ve finished the plan, you can start writing the story.” Materials direct the teacher to have students write their narratives with minimal guidance and support. With this being the first lesson of the year, it may not be feasible to ask third grade students to write for a 45-minute block of time. Materials do not provide information to the teacher about lesson pacing, including guidance for early finishers or students who may need more than 45 minutes to complete the task. 

Optional tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence of optional materials found

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence of optional materials found

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

Indicator 3A
00/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

Indicator 3B
00/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

Indicator 3C
00/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

Indicator 3E
00/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

Indicator 3F
00/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

Indicator 3I
00/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

Indicator 3J
00/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

Indicator 3K
00/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

Indicator 3M
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3N
00/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

Indicator 3Q
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.