Bookworms
2022

Bookworms

Publisher
Open Up Resources
Subject
ELA
Grades
K-5
Report Release
11/01/2022
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
Not Eligible
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
52/112

This score represents an average across grade levels reviewed for: integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, and promotion of mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Building Knowledge
90/144
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

Additional Publication Details

Title ISBN
International Standard Book Number
Edition Publisher Year
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK-1 Tchr Manual 9781638423195
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr Shd Rd M1 9781638423201
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr Shd Rd M2 9781638423218
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr Shd Rd M3 9781638423287
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr Shd Rd M4 9781638423294
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr ELA M1 9781638423300
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr ELA M2 9781638423317
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr ELA M3 9781638423324
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Tchr ELA M4 9781638423331
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Sdnt Wkbk 1 9781638423751
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Sdnt Wkbk 2 9781643110226
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Sdnt Wkbk 3 9781953454546
OUR BKWM 1Ed GK Sdnt Wkbk 4 9781953454553
CLOSE

About This Report

Report for Kindergarten

Alignment Summary

The Bookworms Kindergarten materials partially meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include some instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.

Kindergarten
Gateway 1

Text Quality

36/58
0
26
52
58
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations
Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

The texts used in the Bookworms program are of high quality, engaging and representative, and of high interest to students. Students engage in a range and volume of reading of a variety of genres; however, materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts indicated in the standards. The majority of texts are quantitatively appropriate for the grade level, but materials do not provide a text complexity analysis that addresses qualitative factors or reader and task considerations. During both the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, students have daily opportunities to engage in questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and/or text-dependent, though speaking and listening protocols for evidence-based discussion are limited. Materials provide multiple opportunities for both on-demand and process writing, and writing opportunities address narrative, informational, and opinion writing. Materials include opportunities for students to use authentic texts during their writing instruction, though grammar and usage skills are not always explicitly taught. Students experience vocabulary development within texts, though there is limited vocabulary development across texts. Throughout both the Shared Reading and Differentiated Instruction (DI) block, materials provide explicit instruction that addresses many grade-level phonological awareness and phonics standards, though some skills are only referenced and are not taught explicitly and systematically. The small group instruction format of the DI block does not ensure that all students receive explicit instruction that addresses all foundational skills and not all foundational skills are assessed according to the grade level Assessment Plan.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

11/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

In both the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, students listen to and choral read familiar texts with engaging and high-interest topics, such as insects, school stories, and animal characters. Despite this, materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the standards. Anchor texts do, however, reflect a variety of literary genres, such as realistic fiction, fantasy, folktale, poetry, and historical fiction. The majority of core/anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade. Although the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include Lexile levels and genres for each text, materials do not provide qualitative or associated reader and task complexity information. While the qualitative measure remains relatively the same in Shared Reading, the associated reader and task measure increases in complexity; however, in ELA, there is no significant increase in overall complexity across the school year with texts remaining relatively low qualitatively. Students engage in a range and volume of texts in the Shared Reading and ELA Blocks through teacher read alouds and choral reading. Students have the opportunity to read, listen to, and collaborate on approximately 75 literary and informational texts. However, materials include limited teacher guidance on implementing independent reading in the classroom or a structure for accountability.

Indicator 1A
04/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1a.

The texts used in both the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans meet the criteria of high-quality, engaging texts. Students listen to and choral read familiar texts with high-interest topics, such as insects, school stories, and animal characters. Many of the selected texts have won awards such as the Coretta Scott King Honor Award, have starred reviews, and/or are published trade books by well-known authors. The texts that students listen to multiple times for multiple purposes contain complex language, beautiful illustrations, and diverse perspectives. 

Anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, students listen to and choral read Miss Bindergarten Gets Ready for Kindergarten by Joseph Slate, which has positive reviews from multiple library review journals. This text is appropriate for developing readers as it is a rhyming alphabet book. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, students listen to and choral read Rap a Tap Tap: Here’s Bojangles—Think of That! by Leo and Diane Dillon, which won the Coretta Scott King Honor Award and is an ALA Notable Children’s Book and a Booklist Starred Review selection. This informative text about tap dance uses an engaging narrative and includes challenging vocabulary. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, students listen to and choral read the well-known story The Snow Day by Ezra Jack Keats, which won the Caldecott Medal in 1963. The story is engaging and includes longer sentences, sight words, and unfamiliar words. According to Horn Book Magazine, the text is the first “full-color picture book featuring a small black hero.” 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, students listen to and choral read Follow the Moon Home by Phillippe Cousteau and Deborah Hopkinson. This text has been awarded the Cook Prize, the Green Earth Book Award, and the Notable Social Studies Trade Books for Young People award.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, students listen to The Full Belly Bowl by Jim Aylsworth, a folktale with an engaging story, longer sentences, some challenging vocabulary, and beautiful illustrations. The text is used to help developing readers understand new words and concepts. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, students listen to Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to my Daughters by former president Barack Obama. The text is a Booklist Starred Review selection and a Library Media Connection Highly Recommended Book.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, students listen to Wind Flyers by Angela Johnson, a literary text about the Tuskegee Airmen. The text features an engaging story, some challenging vocabulary, and conversational language. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, students listen to Actual Size by Steve Jenkins. This text won the Orbis Pictus Honor Award in 2005 and is a Booklist Starred Review selection.

Indicator 1B
02/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodable. Those are identified in Criterion 3.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.

Throughout the Kindergarten materials, there is not a balance of informational and literary texts. There are roughly 60% literary texts and 40% informational texts. The anchor texts do, however, reflect a variety of literary genres, such as realistic fiction, fantasy, folktale, poetry, and historical fiction. There is also a variety of informational subgenres throughout the materials, including narrative nonfiction, biographies, and science and social studies texts. 

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students listen to several fantasy texts, such as Miss Bindergarten Gets Ready for Kindergarten by Joseph Slate in Shared Reading, Module 1, Unit 1 and Hi! Fly Guy by Tedd Arnold in Shared Reading, Module 2, Unit 1.

  • Students listen to several poems, including “Thanksgiving” in ELA, Module 2. 

  • Students listen to historical fiction texts, such as Sarah Morton’s Day by Kate Waters in Shared Reading, Module 2, Unit 2. 

  • Students listen to realistic fiction stories, such as Building with Dad by Carol Nevius in ELA Module 2, Unit 1 and Whistle for Willie by Ezra Jack Keats in Shared Reading Module 3, Unit 2. 

  • Students listen to folktales, including Caps for Sale by Esphyr Slobodkina in ELA Module 1, Unit 1 and Fry Bread by Kevin Noble Maillard in ELA, Module 2, Unit 2. 

  • Students listen to texts about science, including From Tadpole to Frog by Wendy Pfeffe and Caterpillar to Butterfly by Karen Marsh in Shared Reading, Module 3, Unit 3.

  • Students listen to texts about social studies, such as Can we Ring the Liberty Bell? by Martha E.H. Rustad in ELA, Module 2, Unit 2 and George Washington: Our First President by Garnet Jackson in ELA Module 3, Unit 2. 

  • Students listen to biographies, including Darling Amelia by Barbara Lowel and Harriet Tubman: Follow the North Star by Violet Findley in Shared Reading, Module 4, Unit 1. 

Materials do not reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • 117 texts or 80% of the texts used throughout Kindergarten are literary, while 30 texts or 20% are informational. 

  • Module 1 contains 39 core texts with 13% being informational and 87% being literary.

  • Module 2 contains 37 core texts, with 24% being informational and 76% being literary.

  • Module 3 contains 36 core texts, with 17% being informational and 83% being literary.

  • Module 4 contains 35 core texts, with 29% being informational and 71% being literary.

Indicator 1C
02/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1c.

The majority of core/anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade. Most of the texts have an appropriate Lexile level, though almost all of the texts are considered qualitatively low. Many reader and task measures are moderate or challenging, though some do not relate to the text and are considered accessible. The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual, Shared Reading Lesson Plans, and ELA Lesson Plans outline the rationale for the educational purpose and placement of the texts included in the program. Although the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans include Lexile levels and genres for each text, materials do not provide qualitative or reader and task complexity information. 

Texts have a variety of complexity levels for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 25, students listen to Biscuit Loves the Library by Alyssa Satin, which has a quantitative level of 230L. It has a qualitative measure of low; however, the reader and task level is moderate because students draw a picture of their favorite thing that Biscuit does at the library and they must include the setting in a drawing. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 20, students read and listen to Sarah Morton’s Day by Kate Waters, which is considered complex. The quantitative level is 700L and the qualitative measure is low. The reader and task is moderately complex as students retell story events and use illustrations to describe story events.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 45, students read and listen to How Plants Grow by Donna Herwek Rice, which is considered complex. The quantitative level is 210L and the qualitative measure is low; however, the reader and task is considered challenging because students draw their favorite life cycle from the past few texts and write about why it is most interesting to them and why. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 40, students read and listen to Harry the Dirty Dog by Gene Zion, which is considered complex. The Lexile is AD520, but the text is considered qualitatively low. The reader and task is considered challenging since students independently orally retell the story. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 7, students listen to Frederick by Leo Lionni, which has an overall complexity level of complex. Its Lexile is 590L, but the qualitative measure is low. The reader and task is considered moderate because students draw a picture of Frederick gathering sun rays, pictures, or words. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 30, students listen to Sammy the Seal by Syd Hoff, which has an overall complexity rating of moderate. While the quantitative feature is low for a read aloud with a Lexile of 380L and the qualitative level is low, the reader and task is considered moderate since the students retell story events and use illustrations to describe story events. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 28, students listen to Grandfather’s Wrinkle’s by Kathryn England, which is considered a complex text. The Lexile is AD600 but the qualitative measure is low. The reader and task is considered moderately complex because students write an opinion sentence about the book. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 18, students listen to Career Day by Anne Rockwell, which has a Lexile of 600AD. The qualitative features are low and the task is accessible since students draw a picture of themself in a career they would want. The text has an overall complexity level of moderate. 

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

  • The provided text complexity documentation is limited to Lexile levels. Materials do not provide qualitative or associated task complexity information. The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics on The Lexile Framework for Reading site.

  • The Bookworms 2–5 Teacher Manual includes a Choosing and Using Books section. Within this section of the manual, the Building A Culturally Responsive Text Collection and a Culturally-Sustaining Curriculum portion gives an overview of the changes the publisher made with regard to the texts included in the program: “We adopted a style guide in the curriculum to capitalize both Black  and White to represent the importance of racial identity and avoid the implication that white was the standard and Black an outlier. We adopted the  term multilingual to replace English language learner to celebrate home language as an asset.” Then, the manual explains grade-specific text selection changes or replacements. Rationales for text selection include choosing texts that fit the grade level themes, are engaging to students, and help build a more culturally responsive text collection. 

  • The Module Overview page for the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans explains how the selected unit texts work together. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, the Module Overview page contains the following information: “Unit 3: Funny Animal Characters will help students learn how authors use fantasy characters to create humor and funny situations by reading fantasy texts and writing a narrative featuring a silly animal character. The books and tasks in the unit work together to help students learn about the traits and behavior of funny animal characters, how authors use those traits and behaviors to create humor in books, and how they can create humor in their writing by including funny characters.”

Indicator 1D
02/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1d.

In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, the overall text complexity and the associated task measure generally increases throughout the year in order to support students’ literacy growth. In the beginning of the year, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 230L–650L and ranges from 450L–1260L by the end of the year. While the qualitative measure remains relatively the same in Shared Reading, the reader and task measure increases in complexity; however, in ELA, there is no significant increase in overall complexity across the school year with texts remaining relatively low qualitatively. End-of-reading tasks do progress slightly in ELA with tasks beginning with drawing, progressing to drawing and writing one word, and ending with drawing and writing sentences; however, these tasks are also open to the use of teacher discretion on whether the teacher models, co-constructs the writing task, or students complete it themselves. Scaffolds do not increase throughout the year as texts become more complex, and students engage in the same structure and routine for Shared Reading throughout the year. 

The complexity of some anchor texts students listen to provides an opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 230L–650L. The qualitative complexity ranges are all considered low. The associated task measure ranges from accessible to moderate and the overall text complexity rating ranges from accessible to complex, with most being moderate. For example, students listen to Miss Bindergarten gets Ready for Kindergarten by Joseph Slate, which has a Lexile of AD590, an appropriate Lexile level for a read-aloud. The qualitative complexity rating is low and the associated task rating is considered moderate, as students retell story events in pictures. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 200L–700L and the qualitative complexity measure ranges from low to medium, though most are considered low. The associated task measure is rated moderate and the overall complexity range for the texts is accessible to complex, with most being moderate. For example, students listen to Little Lucy by Ilene Cooper, which has a Lexile of 350L, which falls below the Lexile Stretch Band for a read aloud. The qualitative complexity rating is also low. The associated task complexity rating is considered moderate as students continue to draw pictures of events and discuss the main character.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 210L–810L and the qualitative complexity measure is considered low. Associated task complexity ratings range from moderate to challenging, and the overall complexity rating is complex for all nine texts in the module. For example, students listen to The Snowy Day by Ezra Jack Keats, which has a Lexile of 500NC, which is appropriate for a read aloud. Though the qualitative complexity rating is low, the associated task complexity rating is challenging. Students continue to retell in pictures and also discuss their favorite part of the text. Students draw a picture of their favorite part and write a sentence to explain why.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 450L–1260L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges are low to moderate, with most texts being rated as low. The associated task measure is rated accessible to challenging and the overall text complexity is between moderate and complex, with most texts being complex. For example, students listen to Harry the Dirty Dog by Gene Zion, which has a Lexile of 520AD, which is appropriate for a read-aloud text, though the qualitative complexity rating is low. Students continue retelling, progressing to retelling with transition words in this module. Students also discuss whether a character in the text was a sidekick and explain why in both drawing and writing.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 340L–900L. The qualitative complexity measure of the texts are low and moderate. Associated task measures range from accessible to challenging. Overall, the text complexity rating ranges from moderate to complex. For example, students listen to What Magnets Can Do by Allan Fowler, which has a Lexile of 580L, an appropriate Lexile level for a read-aloud text in Kindergarten. The qualitative complexity measure of this text is low. The reader and task complexity measure is considered moderate, as students draw items that a magnet would attract.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 480L–830L. The qualitative complexity measure ranges between low and moderate and the associated task measure is moderate. The overall complexity level for texts in this module ranges from complex to very complex, with most of the texts being complex. For example, students listen to Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes, which has a Lexile of 500L, an appropriate Lexile level for read-aloud text in this gradel. The qualitative complexity measure is low and the associated task complexity is considered moderate, as students either watch the teacher model the writing or complete a co-constructed writing response.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from AD470–AD620. The qualitative complexity ranges are all considered low and the associated task complexity ranges from accessible to challenging. The overall complexity rating of texts ranges from moderate to complex, with most being complex. For example, students listen to Grandfather’s Wrinkles by Kathryn England, which has a Lexile of AD600, an appropriate Lexile level for a read-aloud text in Kindergarten. The qualitative complexity measure of this text is low and the associated task complexity is accessible, as the task is either modeled or procured through shared writing and is not text-dependent. Students draw a picture of themselves now and what they think they may look like when they are older. Students also write a sentence about their picture.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, the quantitative complexity measure ranges from 120L–1080L. The qualitative complexity of the texts ranges from low to moderate and the associated task complexity ranges from accessible to challenging. The overall complexity for texts ranges from moderate to very complex, with most being complex. For example, students listen to A Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon, which has a Lexile of AD610, an appropriate Lexile for a read-aloud text in Kindergarten. The qualitative complexity of the text is low and the associated task complexity rating is accessible, as the task can be modeled or produced through shared writing and is not text-dependent. Students draw a picture of themselves and draw things that they like about themselves inside or around the picture. Students label the things they like and write a sentence. 

As texts become more complex, some scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings).  Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials spend the same amount of time on each text, regardless of complexity, with the same five day routine of questions in Shared Reading.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, students learn how to retell. In Module 1, the teacher scaffolds heavily by modeling how to construct a retelling with a beginning-middle-ending structure. Students participate by echoing the teacher’s language. By the end of the year, scaffolds are removed and students retell by first rehearsing orally with a partner and then generating their own retelling. 

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual states that the Response Together prompts happen at the end of the Interactive Read Aloud, though there is no modeled language for teachers to use to support students as tasks and texts become more complex.

Indicator 1E
01/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1e.

Students engage in a range and volume of texts in the Shared Reading and ELA Blocks through teacher read aloud and choral reading. Students have the opportunity to read, listen to, and collaborate on approximately 75 literary and informational texts. The program includes many books including picture books and informational texts. Most of the texts are trade picture books, as well as poems and rhymes.  Informational texts include a variety of topics that are “commonly taught in science and social studies across the nation” according to the publisher. The informational texts also include a variety of text structures. 

Students spend 45 minutes in each Block interacting with either a shared text or a read aloud text, plus 15 minutes of independent reading during the Differentiated Instruction Block. During Shared Reading, students engage in Dialogic Reading, which includes choral reading or echo reading. During ELA, students engage in an interactive read aloud. For independent reading, the program provides a curated list of suggested titles for the 15 minutes of free reading during the Differentiated Instruction Block; however, materials do not include guidance for implementing independent reading in the classroom or a structure for accountability. 

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. For example:

  • Across the nine Shared Reading units, students listen to and read 34 full-length texts from a variety of text types and genres. The texts are read aloud by the teacher and chorally read by the class. For example: 

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, students listen to Fred and Ted go Camping by Peter Eastmen, which is a fictional story.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, students listen to the informational text, A Bee’s Life by Dona Herweck Rice.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, students listen to the Yiddish Folktale, Good Night, Wind: A Yiddish Folktale by Linda Elovitz Marshall. 

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, students listen to The World is not a Rectangle: A Portrait of Architect Zaha Hadid by Jeanette Winter, which is a biography. 

  • Across the 14 ELA units, students listen to 39 full-length texts from a variety of text types and genres. For example:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, students listen to the science informational text, What Lives in a Shell? by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, students listen to Fry Bead by Kevin Noble Maillard, which is a Native American story.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, students listen to Chrysanthemum by Kevin Henkes which is a literary fantasy text. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, students listen to the science informational text Follow the Water from Book to Ocean by Arthur Dorros in Lessons 6 and 7. 

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, contains one unit and a total of 45 lessons. Throughout this module, students listen to a total of nine texts including Rosie’s Walk by Pat Hutchins, Fred and Ted Go Camping by Peter Eastman, and My trip to the Hospital by Mercer Mayer. Students listen to each text over the course of five days. The students engage in the same routine each day. On the first day of reading the text, the teacher shows the illustrations and asks the students what is happening. On the second day of reading the text, the teacher reads one page aloud and shows the illustration and then provides students with a sentence frame to prompt discussion. On the third day of reading, the teacher reads the text again, and stops every few pages to ask a question to prompt retell. On the fourth day of reading, the teacher reads the text again and asks text-specific questions. On the final day of the text, students “read” the book by telling what is happening on each page. 

  • The Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, contains three units, with a total of 45 lessons. Throughout the module, students listen to nine texts, including Good Night, Wind by Linda Elovitz Marshall, Peter’s Chair by Ezra Jack Keats, and Caterpillar to Butterfly by Laura Marsh. Students listen to the text over the course of five days and engage in the same routine each day. On the first day of reading the text, the teacher shows the illustrations and asks the students what is happening. On the second day of reading the text, the teacher reads one page aloud and shows the illustration and then provides students with a sentence frame to prompt discussion. On the third day of reading, the teacher reads the text again, and stops every few pages to ask a question to prompt retell. On the fourth day of reading, the teacher reads the text again and asks text-specific questions. On the final day of the text, students “read” the book by telling what is happening on each page.

  • The ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, contains four units and a total of 45 lessons. Throughout the module, students listen to a total of nine texts. In Lesson 1, the teacher reads aloud A Log’s Life by Wendy Pfeffer over the course of three lessons. The teacher pauses every page or so to ask comprehension questions. In Lesson 6, the teacher reads Building with Dad by Carol Nevius for three lessons and the teacher pauses every page or so to answer questions. In Lesson 11, students listen to Can we Ring the Liberty Bell? by Martha E.H. Rustad. The teacher spends three days on this text. In Lessons 14 and 15, the students listen to Fry Bread: A Native American Family Story by Fevin Noble Maillard. Beginning in Lesson 16, students listen to Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to my Daughters by Barack Obama and engage in the text for fo9ur days. Then in Lessons 21 and 22, students listen to America is…  by Louise Borden and continue having a discussion about the text every page or so. In Lesson 26, students begin listening to Giggle, Giggle, Quack by Doreen Cronin and spend two days listening to this text. Beginning in Lesson 31, students spend five days listening to Make Way for Ducklings by Robert McCloskey. By the end of this module, students listen to Sheila Rae, the Brave by  for three days and Happy Birthday, Martin Luther King by Jean Marzollo for three days. 

  • The ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4 contains two units, and a total of 45 lessons. Throughout the module, students listen to a total of eight texts. Students begin the module by listening to Actual Size by Steven Jenkins for two days and discuss the size of various animals. Students spend three days listening to Follow the Water from Brook to Ocean by Arthur Dorris beginning in Lesson 6. In Lesson 11, students begin listening to Clouds by Anne Rockwell, and spend four lessons on this text. The first three days students read a new section of the text and on the last day, students repeat certain pages to have a discussion about the text. Beginning in Lesson 16, students listen to Career Day by Anne Rockwell for two days and then spend the final day revisiting the text. Students listen to Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman for two days in Lessons 21 and 22. Beginning in Lesson 31, students listen to A Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon for two days and then spend another day listening to the text again. Students listen to Ada’s Violin: The Story of the Recycled Orchestra of Paraguay by Susan Hood for three days, with the final day being a reread of the entire text. In Lesson 41, the teacher reads aloud Leo the Late Bloomer by Robert Kraus. 

There is insufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers.(e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The program materials include an extensive curated list of recommended titles for classroom libraries. The purpose of this list is for students to free read during a 15 minute rotation during the Differentiated Instruction Nlock. The amount of time does not increase over the course of the year as students build reading stamina. 

  • There are no protocols or explicit instructions for how to implement independent reading, including procedures and tracking. The materials include a Book Recommendation form that is an optional way to share whether or not students think others should read the book. The sentence stem for completing the form is the same across K–2. 

  • Students do not have the opportunity to independently read any book during the English Language Arts block or the Shared Reading Block. 

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

13/16

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

Students have daily opportunities to engage in questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and/or text-dependent. Although students have opportunities for text-based discussions every day during the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and during the Interactive Read-Alouds in the ELA Lesson Plans, materials include limited speaking and listening protocols. Materials include opportunities for students to participate in speaking and listening activities related to what they are reading and listening to; however, there are minimal opportunities for students to share what they are researching. Additionally, speaking and listening opportunities are not varied and materials do not address all speaking and listening standards. Materials include frequent opportunities for on-demand writing in both the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans. Materials provide multiple opportunities for students to address opinion, informative, and narrative writing. All explicit instruction for writing occurs in ELA, while some opinion and informational writing opportunities also occur in Shared Reading. Most writing prompts require students to refer explicitly to the texts they have read. The use of authentic text for reading and writing is present; however, some grammar skills are referenced or embedded in the lesson instead of being taught explicitly. Lesson plans provide vocabulary exposure and development across the year and specific protocols for teaching vocabulary, though materials provide few instances of vocabulary words repeating across multiple texts.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.

Students have daily opportunities to engage in questions, tasks, and assignments that are text-specific and/or text-dependent. Students respond to text-dependent and/or text-specific questions during reading, as well as after reading, during both the Shared Reading and ELA blocks. Students often answer a writing prompt that is text-specific or text-dependent. During Shared Reading, students respond to a series of increasingly analytical questions that culminate in a retelling task on the last day of the text. During the ELA block, students respond to questions during the interactive read-aloud, discussion questions following the reading, and a modeled Respond Together prompt to reflect on the text. Some questions include specific page numbers and text cues to help students answer the question by referring to the text. The ELA and Shared Reading lesson plans include precise places and specific teacher guidance during the read aloud to stop and ask questions; however, it is important to note that discussion questions often do not contain possible student responses.

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 5, after reading Miss Bindergarten Gets Ready for Kindergarten by Joseph Slate for several days, students retell the story. The teacher models the retelling for the students and then students draw a picture of one thing Miss Bindergarten put in her classroom.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 39, after reading Roadwork by Sally Sutton  students respond to this question: “Why do the workers plan first?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 35, after engaging with the text From Tadpole to Frog by Wendy Pfeffer, students retell the story, using the pictures on each page as a guide. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 2, while reading Daring Amelia by Barbara Lowell, students complete cloze questions such as, “Amelia Earhart loved to _______.” and “Amelia built a roller coaster and _______.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 3, while listening to Caps for Sale by Esphyr Slobodkina, students respond to the following questions: “Let’s think about the peddler’s problem in Caps for Sale. How did he solve it? Now let’s think about the girl in The Most Magnificent Thing. How did she solve her problem in a different way?” Students share their responses with a partner. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 26, after listening to the selection Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes, students respond to several questions including, “Why does Louise have her handles over her eyes?” and “How does Louis know the way home? Why isn’t he lost, like her sister?” 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 32, after listening to The Pain and the Great One by Judy Blume, students respond to questions such as, “What does the brother call his sister?” and “Do you think his parents really love his sister better?” 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 3, after reading Actual Size by Steven Jenkins, students turn and talk to share facts they learned from the text. The teacher then models how to write a complete sentence about a fact from the text before students write their own sentence about a fact from the text. 

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The K–1 Bookworms Reading and Writing Teacher Manual explains the inclusion of Dialogic Reading in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and notes how each day of the week features a certain type of question that builds from most concrete to most analytical. The Teacher Manual explains that they call this the CROWD protocol and question types include Completion, Recall, Open-Ended, Wh questions, and Distancing. 

  • The K–1 Bookworms Reading and Writing Teacher Manual explains the steps for the ELA routine, which includes an interactive text reading, a discussion, as well as a Respond Together writing prompt, all of which include text-dependent questions. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 3, the teacher and students read Bunny Cakes by Rosemary Wells. Materials list questions to ask after reading specific pages of the text such as, “Read each page aloud. Ask questions on pages indicated. Page 1 (It was grandma’s...) What kind of cake did Ruby want to make?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 12, students discuss the ending of The Doorbell Rang by Pat Hutchins and name other books that they have read that have surprise endings. There is a teaching tip that states, “If students can’t think of any other books, you could remind them about the surprises at the end of The Most Magnificent Thing and Caps for Sale.”

Indicator 1G
01/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.

Although students have opportunities for text-based discussions every day during the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and during the Interactive Read-Alouds in the ELA Lesson Plans, materials include limited speaking and listening protocols. In Shared Reading, students follow the CROWD protocol, which is a five-day pattern of question sets during the lessons. In ELA, students have many opportunities for turn and talks; however, materials do not provide a protocol for this type of discussion. Some of the turn-and-talks include guidance, such as the amount of time students talk. Teacher support is minimal but includes “Teaching Tips” boxes in the lesson plans, which offer suggestions for including all students or creating visuals to aid discussion. Additionally, the Teacher Manual provides guidance around “Building and Using Norms for Participation in Discussion; however, instructional lessons and student speaking and listening opportunities do not reference the accountable talk measures outlined in the document.

Materials include limited protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms K-1 Teacher Manual includes a section called “Building and Using Norms for Participation in Discussion” that is based on the norms for Accountable Talk. This section provides teachers with prompts and sentence stems to use in various group discussion structures, but these guidelines are not referenced within the instructional lessons to support students’ speaking and listening skill development.

  • Shared Reading includes the Dialogic Reading Routine, which includes opportunities for evidence-based discussions. The teacher begins the week by sharing the book and each day has a different focus for students to talk about the book. For example, in Lesson 2 of the week, the teacher reads the text utilizing the embedded framing questions and on day 5, students retell the story using provided scaffolds. 

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual explains the CROWD protocol, a five-day pattern of questions students respond to during Shared Reading. This protocol supports evidence-based discussions, as it “identifies question types that should be included in a dialogic reading session:

    • C: Completion

    • R: Recall

    • O: Open-Ended

    • W: Wh- (who, what, where)

    • D: Distancing” 

  • During the Interactive Read Aloud, the teacher reads the text and stops frequently to ask questions. Students answer individually or in pairs. Materials do not include specific protocols for partner sharing. For example, in Module 2, Lesson 36, while listening to Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes, the teacher says ,”Why is she saying that to herself? Talk to your partner about it.” Materials do not provide teacher guidance on what partner talk looks like. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 21, during the read-aloud of Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman, students turn and talk about an event in the text, but materials do not provide a protocol for this opportunity. 

  • After the Interactive Read Aloud, materials include a final question to bring closure to the day. This question “can be answered by an individual, but it can also be answered individually between partners;” however, materials do not provide a protocol for this opportunity nor is direct teacher guidance provided. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes some facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual provides background information on the Dialogic Reading routine. The manual states, “as we designed the lessons, we viewed talk as requiring a topic to talk about, specific words to use, growing confidence with the grammar of spoken English, and an audience for practicing listening and speaking in conversational turns.” The manual further states that the purpose of Dialogic Reading is to “maximize student talk.” 

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual suggests using a speaking and listening rubric once per month. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, after listening to Rosie’s Walk by Pat Hutchins, the students turn and talk to a partner about what they are going to draw. The facilitation support includes, “Give students 1–2 minutes to discuss. Summarize what you heard your students say and send them back to their seats.”  

  • Materials provide some Teaching Tips during Shared Reading to support speaking and/or listening such as in Module 2, Lesson 20, after reading Sarah Morton’s Day by Kate Waters: “This is an oral language activity and it is not necessary to write the retelling down. Instead, use the frame to prompt an oral retelling.” 

  • Materials provide some Teaching Tips during ELA to support speaking and/or listening such as in Module 3, Lesson 32, after listening to The Pain and the Great One by Judy Blume: “Consider listing students' responses on a chart similar to the one below.” 

Indicator 1H
01/02

Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.

Materials include opportunities for students to participate in speaking and listening activities related to what they are reading and  listening to; however, there are minimal opportunities for students to share what they are researching. Additionally, speaking and listening opportunities are not varied and materials do not address all speaking and listening standards. In both the Shared Reading and ELA blocks, students have opportunities to discuss what they are reading in a whole group or with a partner; however, the materials do not include opportunities for students to engage in a range of conversation types or collaborations. In Shared Reading lessons, a five-day cycle of questioning, from most literal to analytical, accompanies each read-aloud text. In ELA, discussion is part of each Interactive Read Aloud. Throughout the program, there is no formal instruction provided to explicitly teach the Speaking and Listening standards. 

Students have multiple opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others and taking turns speaking about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • No evidence found in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 2, after listening to Caps for Sale by Esphyr Slobodkina, students talk with a partner and discuss what they remember about the main characters. The task does not include agreed-upon rules for students to follow during their partner discussion. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 35, students write a sentence that matches an illustration and then share it with a partner. The teacher reminds students how to do this by saying, “You’ll listen to your friend’s sentence and look at their illustration and give a compliment. Then you can switch roles.” 

  • Add drawings or other visual displays to descriptions as desired to provide additional detail. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • No evidence found in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 21, after listening to the text A Tree for all Seasons by Robin Bernard, students draw and color a leaf to represent their favorite season. Students then share their work.

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Continue a conversation through multiple exchanges. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • No evidence found

  • While materials include opportunities for students to confirm understanding of a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media by asking and answering questions about key details, materials do not include opportunities for students to request clarification if something is not understood. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 18, after listening to Lola at the Library by Anna McQuinn, students answer questions about the text such as, “Why does Lola like Tuesdays?” and “What does she need her library card for?” 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 21, after listening to Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman, students have a discussion about how the character Grace and her family reacted to the characters Natalie and Raj. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Lessons 18 and 19, students prepare for a short research project during which they list facts about famous Americans. Students create a chart with the teacher about interesting facts and then students retell the information they learned about the famous Americans listed. 

  • Ask and answer questions in order to seek help, get information, or clarify something that is not understood. 

    • No evidence found

  • Describe familiar people, places, things, and events and, with prompting and support, provide additional detail. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Shared Reading Module 1, Lesson 19, after listening to the text Lola at the Library by Anna McQuinn, students respond to several personal questions such as, “What’s your favorite day? Why?” and “What do you do when you go to a library?”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 21, after listening to the text A Tree for all Seasons by Robin Bernard, students share their favorite season. Students respond using the sentence frame, “My favorite season is ______ because _______.”

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.

Materials include frequent opportunities for on-demand writing. In Shared Reading, students respond to an on-demand prompt every fifth day. In ELA, students regularly use drawing and/or writing to both create narratives or respond to texts. Materials introduce process writing during the third Module, and editing and revising instruction begins in the fourth and final Module. Materials do not incorporate digital resources, with the exception of one opportunity in the final Module, during which students create a video commercial of their favorite book. 

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, after listening to The Most Magnificent Thing by Ashley Spires, students draw one way that the dog assisted the girl in making the most magnificent thing. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 5, after listening to Miss Bindergarten Gets Ready for Kindergarten by Joseph Slate, students draw a picture of one thing Miss Bindergarten put in her classroom. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 5, students write and illustrate facts they learned in the text, A Bee’s Life by Donna Herweck Rice. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 15, students draw a picture of their favorite book in their insect unit. They must include why they like the book in their drawing. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 10, after listening to and reading Wind: A Yiddish Folktale by Linda Elovitz Marshall, students draw a picture of one way that the wind acts like a person in the story and then add words to tell about the picture. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 22, after listening to Wind Flyers by Angela Johnson, students draw a picture of the boy’s uncle protecting one of the other planes. Then students write about the picture. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 22, after listening to Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman, students draw a picture that shows Grace in the play and then write a sentence about the picture.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 45, after listening to Tarra & Bella: The Elephant and Dog who Became Best Friends by Carol Buckley, students draw a picture of one way that Bella is different from the dinosaur and Mudge. Students then write some words or a sentence that tells about the picture.  

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 3–5, students write a narrative about their day. On the first day, the teacher models how to write an initial event using the sentence starter, “First I.” The second day, the teacher and students write another sentence using the sentence starter, “Next I.” On the final day, the teacher and students repeat the process with the sentence starter, “Last I.” 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 9, students write a narrative about a time their face wilted. Materials include two sentence starters and provide students with an opportunity to plan their writing with a partner. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 3, students write an informative text about animals. The teacher models writing a topic sentence, and then writing a fact about the topic. The teacher also models revising by writing the second sentence again, but with more detail. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, students learn about editing. The teacher shares the Sentence Checklist that students work on with a partner to review and edit their writing. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 25, students apply the revision and editing process to factual sentences they wrote the previous day. They work with a partner to use the Sentence Checklist to revise and edit their sentences. 

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual includes a checklist students may use to revise and edit their own writing. The Sentence Writing Checklist provides a yes/no column for students to check to make sure their writing has a subject and predicate, a capital letter at the start, and ends with a punctuation mark.

Materials include minimal digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 5, Lessons 26–30, students create a book review in the form of a commercial. The materials state that students should make a video but if technology is not available, students can perform their commercial in front of the class.

Indicator 1J
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing (year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.

Materials provide multiple opportunities for students to address opinion, informative, and narrative writing. Over the course of the year, students complete 29 writing pieces in ELA. All explicit instruction for writing occurs in ELA, while some opportunities to write about the text (both opinion and informational)also occur in Shared Reading. In ELA, writing opportunities follow a gradual release of responsibility model over the course of the year. Most writing opportunities connect to texts read aloud in the ELA Lesson Plans, and occasionally the Shared Reading Lesson Plans. Sometimes the texts are used as mentor texts, and other times they are used for evidence-based writing. 

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:

    • Students write a total of 10 opinion pieces. Opinion writing accounts for 34% of writing opportunities across the school year. Students write two opinion pieces in Module 1, three opinion pieces in Module 2, three opinion pieces in Module 3, and three opinion pieces in Module 4. 

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:

    • Students write a total of 10 informative/explanatory pieces. Informative/Explanatory writing accounts for 34% of writing opportunities across the school year. Students write two informative pieces in Module 1, three informative pieces in Module 2, two informative pieces in Module 3, and three informative pieces in Module 4. 

  • Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:

    • Students write a total of nine narrative pieces. Narrative writing accounts for 31% of writing opportunities across the school year. Students write one narrative piece in Module 1, two narrative pieces in Module 2, three narrative pieces in Module 3, and three narrative pieces in Module 4. 

  • Explicit instruction in opinion writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 39, students learn how to write opinions about characters after listening to Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes. The teacher gives a list of either subjects or predicates that can be used to create opinion sentences. Then the teacher models choosing one subject and one predicate from the list to form an opinion and writes it down. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans Module 3, Lesson 23, the teacher models choosing reasons for opinions. The teacher starts by saying, “I would like to make a list of all the reasons for your opinion of this book”. The teacher then asks the students to use one word to express their opinion of the book. Then, the teacher models by writing, “Wind Flyers is an exciting book.”

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 9, students learn how to write a how- to book. The teacher explains that “when you write a how-to, you tell someone how to do something in the order that the task should be completed”.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 19, students learn about informative writing. The teacher begins by modeling thinking about facts about someone he/she knows well. Then the teacher models choosing one fact to write. 

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing: 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 1, the teacher introduces a new narrative writing assignment and models planning a narrative about their own day. The teacher thinks aloud and then writes the sentence. 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 39, the teacher models reviewing the anchor chart when writing narratives to ensure everything is included such as, “Tell what happens first. This is probably where you are during the story and what you are doing there”. 

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. For example: 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing. For example: 

    • Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose opinion pieces in which they tell a reader the topic or the name of the book they are writing about and state an opinion or preference about the topic or book (e.g., My favorite book is...).

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 20, after listening to Lola at the Library by Anna McQuinn, students write a sentence that tells whether they liked it or not. Students begin by taking a subject and predicate from a list created as a class to create their opinion sentence. Then students illustrate their sentence to go with the picture.  

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 39–40, students write an opinion sentence about their favorite character and give a reason why. Students are encouraged to add an illustration that matches the words in the sentence. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 34, students begin writing book reviews about the text The Pain and the Great One by Judy Blume. After eliciting students’ thoughts on the text, the teacher models writing an opinion sentence about the text. Then students write their own sentences. Students are given a sentence frame where they include the title of the book they are writing about and state whether they think it is a good book or not a good book. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 19–20, students write a book review about the text Career Day by Anne Rockwell. The book review must include a topic sentence, opinion, and details about the book. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example: 

    • Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose informative/explanatory texts in which they name what they are writing about and supply some information about the topic.

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 20, students write a sentence about something they learned in the text What Lives in a Shell by Katherleen Winsor Zoehfeld. They also draw an illustration about a snail shell. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 20, students write and illustrate a fact about Jane Addams after listening to the text Of Thee I sing by Barack Obama. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 15, students observe and sketch clouds they see outside. Afterwards, students write an informative sentence about the type of cloud, using information from the book Clouds by Anne Rockwell. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example: 

    • Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to narrate a single event or several loosely linked events, tell about the events in the order in which they occurred, and provide a reaction to what happened.

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 38, students participate in a shared writing task in which they choose subjects and predicates from a given list, put them together, and the teacher writes narrative sentences. Students then illustrate the created sentences. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 28–30, as a class, students brainstorm the actions that the character Sammy the Seal takes. Students take one of the actions and write one sentence. Then students write another sentence using the word next. Finally, students write a final sentence using the word last

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 9–10, students write a narrative about a sad moment. Students include how they felt in their narrative. 

      • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 39–40, students brainstorm an exciting adventure that they had and could write about. Then, they write one sentence to start their narrative. Students add another sentence or two about the narrative, including what happened next and feelings about the entire event. 

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example: 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 44, after reading the book Happy Birthday, Martin Luther King by Jean Marzollo, students write an opinion sentence about the main character and then illustrate it. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 14, students write narrative sentences about a time they were outside in interesting weather. Students use the text Snowmen at Night by Carolyn Buehner as a mentor text. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 15, students write informative reports about clouds. Students make observations about real clouds outside, and also recall information about clouds from the read-aloud text Clouds by Anne Rockwell. 

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1k.

Students write in response to texts every five days following the Shared Reading read-aloud session. The majority of these prompts ask students to refer explicitly to the texts they have read. Many writing tasks In the ELA Lesson Plans also require students to refer to the texts in their writing. Students also have several opportunities throughout the year to express their opinion of a text, during the ELA instructional block. At the beginning of the year, students learn and practice making sentences based on information in read alouds using recalled information from the texts. Students also learn and practice writing informative texts and reports and book reviews based on their recall of information from read aloud texts.  

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 30, after listening to Paddington Sets Sail by Michael Bond, the teacher asks students some things they see at the beach and about the important event that happened because Paddington was at the beach. Then students draw a picture of an important event that happened because Paddington was at the beach. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 30, after listening to Little Lucy by Ilene Cooper, students draw a picture of Lucy after discussing the character. Students are challenged to write some words to describe her too.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, after listening to Daring Amelia by Barbara Lowell, students draw a picture of how they think Amelia made a difference in the world. Students also write some words or a sentence to tell about the picture.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 34, the teacher provides students a list of subjects and predicates about magnets from the text What Magnets Do. Then the teacher models putting different subjects and predicates together to create sentences about magnets based on the book. Students then work independently to write their own sentences about magnets based on the list of subjects and predicates and the facts they read about in the text. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 20, the teacher models writing about their favorite American that they read about. The teacher begins by giving students a list of subjects and predicates about the Americans. The teacher then puts one together to write about their favorite American. The students then have the opportunity to write about their favorite American that they read about by including the subject and a predicate which includes a fact from a text. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 44 - 45, the teacher models how to write about plants after reading several texts about plants. Students begin by generating a list of things they learned about plants. Then the teacher models how to write one or two facts about plants before students have the opportunity to do the same.  

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 23 - 25, the teacher models how to write facts about Harriet Tubman after listening to Harriet Tubman: Follow the North Star before students have the opportunity to write facts that they learned about Harriet Tubman.  First the students make a list of facts that the teacher records on the board. Then the teacher models choosing one to write a sentence. Students then have the opportunity to write their own sentences. 

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 9, students choose sentence strips, one with a subject and one with a predicate. Students put the strips together to write a sentence that tells how they feel about Rosie’s Walk.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 8, students write and illustrate an opinion about the text Building with Dad by Myron Uhlberg. Students write about which vehicle was their favorite and draw a picture of that vehicle at work. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 9, students write book reviews about either Follow the Moon Home by Phillippe Cousteau and Deborah Hopkson or Follow the Water from Brook to Ocean by Arthur Dorris. 

Indicator 1L
01/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1l.

Materials include explicit instruction of many grammar and language conventions standards, and students have opportunities for authentic application of these standards. Throughout the materials, instruction in grammar and conventions of language along with opportunities for application, which are integrated into writing activities. The use of authentic text for reading and writing is present; however, some grammar skills are referenced or embedded in the lesson instead of being taught explicitly. Materials do not include explicit instruction in punctuation, prepositions, capitalizing the pronoun I, or capitalization.

Materials include explicit instruction of most grammar and conventions standards for the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Print many upper- and lowercase letters.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 22, the teacher demonstrates how to form a capital and lowercase M. The teacher tells students how to form each letter and shows students how to make each letter by skywriting. The teacher models writing the letter, and students skywrite at least five times for the new letter.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 28, the teacher demonstrates how to form each letter (Bb, Mm, Ss) by telling students how to form each letter and by showing them how to write each letter on a whiteboard. The teacher models once and then writes the letters along with students five more times for each new letter and three times for each review letter.

  • Use frequently occurring nouns and verbs.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 2, the teacher shares a sentence with students. The teacher tells the students that this is a good sentence because it has two parts: the subject and predicate. The teacher explains what both subject and predicate mean. The teacher models changing the subject and predicate to create new sentences.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1 Lesson 7, the teacher displays the sentence “The mice work hard.” The teacher explains that the mice is what the sentence is about and works hard is what they do. The teacher and students practice changing the subject and the predicate with new nouns and verbs.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 14, the teacher shows a card with the word knocked and a picture. The teacher says, “This word is knocked. Let’s say that together: knocked. Knocked means to bump into.” Then, the teacher instructs the students to turn to a partner and tell what they know about the word knocked. The teacher further instructs students to raise their hands when they hear the word knocked when the book is read aloud.

  • Form regular plural nouns orally by adding /s/ or /es/ (e.g., dog, dogs; wish, wishes).

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 22, the teacher reads the sentence “Grace loved stories.” Students are asked to generate a list of other things Grace might love. The teacher says, “We can use those words in our sentence frame. We will decide if we need to add s or es.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans Module 2, Lesson 9, the teacher shows a card with the word pests and a picture of this word. The teacher says, “This word is pests. Let’s say that together: pests. A pest is an annoying person or animal.” Students are instructed to turn to a partner and tell what they know about the word pests. Then, students are instructed to raise their hands when they hear the word pests in the book being read aloud.

  • Understand and use question words (interrogatives) (e.g., who, what, where, when, why, how).

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 15, the teacher reviews the question words they have been working with and adds how. The teacher models the question “How do you make fry bread?” The students then work with the teacher to compose more “How do you make _____?” questions.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 27, the teacher reminds students that sentences need a subject and predicate. The teacher tells students they have been working on questions and questions start with a question word and end with a question mark. The teacher tells students they have used four question words: what, why, where, and how. In this lesson, the teacher introduces the question word who.

  • Use the most frequently occurring prepositions (e.g., to, from, in, out, on, off, for, of, by, with). 

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 19, the teacher displays the sentence “People made bright lights shine.” The students work with the teacher to compose sentences which add to the predicate using the words by, to, in, or on.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 41, the teacher displays the sentence “And every night Leo’s father watched him for signs of blooming.” The students work with the teacher to add to the predicate using to, from, in, out, on, for, by, or with.

  • Produce and expand complete sentences in shared language activities.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 4, the teacher shows students a card with the word pouch and a picture for this word. The teacher and students say the word together and then discuss the meaning. The teacher asks students to turn to a partner and use the word pouch in a sentence. This process is repeated for the word cycle.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 10, the teacher shows students the words drift, permission, pounding, and cave. The teacher and students say the words together and then discuss the meanings. The teacher asks students to turn to a partner and use each word in a sentence.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 8, the teacher provides students with a list of subjects and predicates drawn from the day’s literature. The teacher and students work together to create sentences by choosing a subject and a predicate to put together to form a sentence.

  • Capitalize the first word in a sentence and the pronoun I.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 19, the teacher tells students that, to make a sentence perfect, they should add a capital letter to the first word and a punctuation mark at the end of each sentence. The teacher shows students how to make a period. The teacher models adding a capital letter and punctuation to a sentence. Students return to their seats to practice writing a sentence with a capital letter and punctuation.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 45, the students work with a partner to fix any sentences that do not start with a capital letter or end with punctuation.

  • Recognize and name end punctuation.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 19, the teacher models adding a period at the end of the sentence. The teacher tells the students that it is a period and that a period is “just a dot.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 28, the teacher reads the title of the book Who Lives In A Shell?. The teacher points out that the title is a sentence, and the sentence does not end in a period. The teacher tells the students that the sentence ends with a question mark. The students work with the teacher to compose more questions that end in a question mark.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 33, the teacher shares a question and reminds students that “a question is a kind of sentence.” This kind of sentence does not start with a subject; rather, it starts with a question word. The teacher tells students that this sentence ends with a question mark instead of a period.

  • Write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes).

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 4, the teacher models writing a word by writing the sounds you hear. The teacher tells students to think about the sounds in the word queen and share how many sounds they hear. The teacher then models writing a letter for each of the four sounds heard.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3 Lesson 39, the teacher leads the lesson “Sound and Blend” with students. The teacher states, “Now we are going to sound and blend each word. The way you do that is to look at each letter, make each sound, and then say the sounds fast to make a word. I’ll sound and blend each one, and then you’ll do it. Point to each letter as you say each sound out loud. Listen and watch me. /b/ /i/ /n/, bin.” The teacher points to each letter as students say the sounds. Then the teacher and students repeat the procedure for the remaining word cards for the words kin, pin, tin, pig,wig, fig, and gig.

  • Spell simple words phonetically, drawing on knowledge of sound-letter relationships.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 14, the teacher models how to write a word using the number of sounds they hear in the word. The teacher writes a letter for each sound heard in the word. Students practice doing this with the teacher and on their own.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 8, students draw a picture of a river delta, and write a sentence to tell about the picture. The teacher reminds students to “find the sounds in each word and write them down.”

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 39, the teacher writes the sentence “I stood on stage.”The teacher thinks aloud as they stretch out words to spell. The teacher instructs the students to “find the sounds in each word you want to write down” as the students are writing.

Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 19, students write facts about someone they know well. The teacher models writing sentences. Students write sentences about someone they know. The teacher reminds students that each sentence should have a subject and predicate.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 9, after reading two books as a class, students write a book review for the book they like the best. The teacher provides a sentence checklist for students to use. The teacher reminds students that sentences should have a subject and predicate, start with a capital letter, end with punctuation, use appropriate spacing between words, and stretch and spell words.

Indicator 1M
02/02

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.

Lesson plans provide vocabulary exposure and development across the year. The program includes specific protocols for teaching vocabulary. Teachers have guidance on how to perform daily vocabulary routines. In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, students learn and review words before and after reading. The lesson design is structured to introduce vocabulary words before or after the ELA Interactive Read Aloud sessions, depending on the genre. Materials give attention to the selection of Tier 2 words to accompany narrative stories In the ELA Lesson Plans and of Tier 3 words as part of informational texts In the ELA Lesson Plans. At times in Shared Reading and ELA, some vocabulary words repeat across texts.

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual includes a general description of the vocabulary plan for the program. The manual explains that “the vocabulary knowledge built In the ELA Lesson Plans spills into Shared Reading to increase comprehension” and “The informational texts In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and ELA build vocabulary that spills over into science and social studies instruction.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, during Word Walk, the teacher introduces, teaches, and reviews four vocabulary words over a five-day cycle. The teacher teaches two vocabulary words on Day 1 and reviews the words on Day 2. Then the teacher introduces two more vocabulary words on Day 3 and reviews them on Day 4. The teacher reviews all four vocabulary words on Day 5. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, each time a teacher introduces a new vocabulary word, the teacher displays a card with the vocabulary word and picture. Then the teacher reads the word and the students repeat it. Next, the teacher tells the students a child friendly definition before the teacher reads a book that uses the vocabulary word in context. Then, students listen to a sentence using the word in another context. Lastly, students produce a sentence-level context for the word and share it with a partner. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, vocabulary instruction for informational texts often occurs using a diagram and instruction always occurs before the reading begins. The vocabulary words are content-area words that help students understand the text, though materials do not explicitly state what the focus words are or what their importance is to the text. For example, in Module 2, Lesson 11, prior to reading Can we Ring the Liberty Bell? By Martha E.H. Rustad, the teacher introduces the word symbol. Before reading the text, the teacher starts a chart on which students can add information about symbols as students listen to the text.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, vocabulary instruction for narrative texts occurs after reading. The teacher always repeats the vocabulary word, gives a definition of the word, and explains how the word was used in the reading. Then, students use the vocabulary word in a new context. For example, in Module 4, Lesson 22, after reading Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman, students review the words imaginary and auditions from the texts.

Vocabulary is repeated at times in contexts (before texts, in texts), and at times across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 1, students learn the words nectar and stores. Before reading, the teacher introduces the words and provides their definitions. After reading, the teacher returns to the page with each word and rereads the sentence. Then, the teacher introduces the word in another context. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 3-4, the teacher introduces the word cycle. Instruction and review of this word occurs in Module 3, Lessons 31, 35–36, 40–41, and 45. Students revisit the word cycle in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 36 and 41. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 5, after reading Bunny Cakes by Rosemary Wells for five days, students use all four vocabulary words — grocer, flour, iced, thrilled — when talking to their partner about the words and using them in a sentence.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 13, the teacher introduces and explains the word anxious. Students revisit the word in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 7, after students listen to the story Frederick by Leo Lionni. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 2, after listening to Caps for Sale by Esphyr Slobodkina, students learn the words ordinary and disturbing. In Module 3, Lesson 33, students revisit the word ordinary, after listening to The Pain and the Great One by Judy Bloom. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 16, students listen to the text, Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to by Daughters by Barack Obama. Students learn the word president and revisit this same word in Module 3, Lesson 16, before listening to George Washington: Our First President by Garnet Jackson. 

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, lessons for narrative texts include instruction in Tier 2 words that appear in the texts. The teacher introduces two words each day and students review all four vocabulary words on the fifth day of the lesson cycle. The Teacher Manual explains that the two vocabulary words are words that are likely to come up in another text and will be part of students’ vocabularies. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, lessons for informational texts include instruction in Tier 3 words. According to the publisher, the program utilizes this lesson structure because “students need to have specific content-area terms introduced before they listen or as they encourage them to enhance understanding.”

Criterion 1.3: Tasks and Questions: Foundational Skills Development K-2

12/24

Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.

Instruction on foundational skills occurs in both the Shared Reading Lesson Plans and the Differentiated Instruction (DI) block, though the small group instruction format of the DI block does not ensure that all students receive explicit instruction on all foundational skills. Materials include explicit instruction of most grade-level phonological awareness and phonics standards, though some skills are referenced but are not taught explicitly and systematically. Materials include repeated instruction with frequent opportunities for students to practice phonological awareness skills throughout each lesson. Though materials follow a general sequence of instruction, materials lack a clear, evidence-based explanation for the sequence of phonological awareness used in the program. Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply some grade-level phonics skills. Lessons include limited instruction and practice opportunities for building, manipulating, spelling, and encoding. Materials include tasks that provide some explicit instruction and practice in concepts about print. While letters are reviewed and presented to students in the lessons with teacher support, materials lack opportunities for students to identify letters independently. Materials also lack explicit instruction opportunities to teach all letters of the alphabet. Materials provide limited opportunities for students to practice automaticity and accuracy of grade-level decodable words through various reading opportunities. Texts are often read first by the teacher, with echo or choral reading following; however, texts do not match the order of skills that are being taught. Materials include some systematic and explicit instruction in word recognition and analysis in connected texts and tasks. While connected texts are included in the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, the texts do not directly relate to the word recognition and analysis skills being taught and do not contain words related to that focus. Materials provide opportunities to assess students on most foundational skills; however, except for a rubric that is available for teacher use, there are minimal opportunities to assess concepts about print. While materials provide an Assessment Plan for each grade level, teacher guidance for assessment protocols is not clear or specific. Materials provide some suggestions for differentiating instructional materials, questions, and tasks when teaching foundational skills. While the K-1 Teacher Manual provides overall suggestions, teacher instructions are not specific or explicit in providing differentiated supports for students who struggle, multilingual learners, or students who are high-achieving.

While the materials provide a set of instructional routines, they miss opportunities for students to be active participants in the learning and apply that learning in context. The lesson frameworks included in the DI Manual do not provide teachers with adequate support in planning lessons for all students nor do they provide full learning opportunities for students. Additionally, since the DI Manual is written to be curriculum agnostic, the materials miss opportunities to create explicit connections between the lessons in the Shared Reading/ELA blocks and the DI block, preventing cohesion and knowledge-building across the entire program. Because the DI Manual does not provide a comprehensive scope and sequence of foundational skills outside of how topics are set up in the table of contents, teachers are responsible for the bulk of lesson planning and determining the coherent sequence of foundational skills for each small group of students. Materials do not provide clear guidance on using assessment results and the generic lesson frameworks to support teachers with developing coherently sequenced foundational skills lessons.

Indicator 1N
Read

Materials, questions, and tasks directly teach foundational skills to build reading acquisition by providing systematic and explicit instruction in the alphabetic principle, letter-sound relationships, phonemic awareness, and phonological awareness (K-1), and phonics (K-2) that demonstrate a transparent and research-based progression for application both in and out of context.

Indicator 1N.i
01/02

Explicit instruction in phonological awareness (K-1) and phonics (K-2).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1n.i.

Materials include explicit instruction of most grade-level phonological awareness and phonics standards. Materials provide the teacher with systematic and explicit modeling for syllables, sounds, and spoken words instruction. However, activities include blending phonemes, but there are no examples of blending syllables. Phonics skills, such as associating the long and short sounds with the common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels and blending of CVC words, are referenced but are not taught explicitly and systematically. There is no evidence that students are taught to distinguish between similarly spelled words by identifying the sounds of the letters that differ.

Materials provide the teacher with some systematic, explicit modeling for instruction in syllables, sounds (phonemes), and spoken words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Recognize and produce rhyming words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 3, the teacher tells students they will find or make rhyming words. The teacher and students chorally read a poem. After reading, students tell a partner what the poem is about. The teacher tells students that “words rhyme when they sound the same at the end.” The teacher reads rhyming words and emphasizes the rhyme when saying each word. The teacher reads words that do not rhyme and points out that these words do not sound the same at the end. The teacher rereads a portion of the poem, pointing out rhyming words. The teacher repeats this procedure for all stanzas of the poem.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 13, the teacher tells students they find or make rhyming words. The class chorally reads a poem, and students say to their partners what they read. The teacher reminds students what it means to rhyme and provides examples and non-examples of rhyming words. The teacher reads a stanza from the poem and asks the class if they heard any rhyming words. The teacher invites students to make more rhyming words for high and fly. The same procedure is followed for you, play, make, go, and boat.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 43, the teacher explains that words rhyme when they sound the same at the end. The teacher uses the words weeks, cheeks, and seeks, and they ask, “Do these words rhyme? How do you know?” Students respond, “Yes, because they sound the same at the end. They all end with (/eeks/).” The teacher also asks students to listen to the following words: cat, kitten, clouds, kept. The teacher asks, “Do they rhyme? How do you know?” The teacher continues to have the students listen to words from the poem and explain why they rhyme. The materials provide a teacher tip as a scaffold: “If needed, prompt by reading the two phrases that include the rhyming words rather than the entire lines.”

  • Count, pronounce, blend, and segment syllables in spoken words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher tells students they will learn how to count words and syllables. The teacher and students chorally read a poem. The teacher models counting the number of words in the first line of the poem and tells students that the way to do this is to touch the first letter of each word as they count. The teacher reminds students that the first letter comes after a space. Students practice counting words with sentences from the poem. The teacher models how to count syllables in words. The teacher tells students, “Syllables are parts or chunks of words. All words have syllables. Words can have one, two, three, or more syllables. We can count syllables by clapping our hands for each syllable.” The teacher says the word bucket and claps hands for each syllable, telling students that bucket has two syllables. The teacher repeats with the word cup.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 14, the teacher tells students to count words and syllables in words. The class chorally reads a poem. The teacher models counting the number of words in a sentence. After telling students that they will count syllables in words, the teacher reviews what syllables are and how to count syllables. The teacher models counting syllables with the word watch, clapping for each syllable.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, the teacher instructs students to hold up one finger for each phoneme as they say the sounds slowly. The teacher guides students to say the individual sounds in the word heels, then blends the sounds to say the complete word. The teacher repeats this process for fresh, bloom, and black.

  • Blend and segment onsets and rimes of single-syllable spoken words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 8, the teacher shares rhyming words with students and tells students the words rhyme because they all end with -orn. The teacher presents pie and die and tells students they rhyme because they end with /igh/ sound at the end.

  • Isolate and pronounce the initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in three-phoneme (consonant-vowel-consonant, or CVC) words.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 30, the teacher chooses four pictures from the Word Study Chart, making sure to represent each of the letter-sound categories. The teacher calls out the name of the pictures without segmenting the initial sounds.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 14, the teacher says the word cat and holds up a finger for each phoneme /c/ /a/ /t/, cat. The teacher uses Elkonin Boxes and moves a marker for each sound. The class repeats this procedure for mat, fat, sat, can, man, pan, and van

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 35, the teacher presents the sounds or phonemes of a word, holding up a finger for each phoneme. The teacher says the word fast to blend all sounds. This process is repeated for the words gleam, twirl, and spin. Next, the teacher says a word and then says the word slowly. This process is repeated for lift, bleam, twirl, and spin.

    • In How to Plan for Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Using Letter Sounds: Generic Lesson Plan, page 78, the teacher says a word, repeats the word slowly and moves a marker for each sound of the word. Students repeat the process.

  • Add or substitute individual sounds (phonemes) in simple, one-syllable words to make new words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 13, the teacher takes the word jack and models changing /j/ to /b/. The teacher discusses the new word back. The teacher changes /b/ to /t/ to create the word tack. The teacher repeats this process with the word beams, changing /b/ to /s/ and then to /h/.

Materials provide the teacher with examples for instruction in syllables, sounds (phonemes), and spoken words called for in grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 19, there is an example of counting words in a sentence. In the example, there is guidance to help the teacher use sounds to write the words in the sentence. For example: “The sentence has five words. The first word is My. I will write My at the beginning of the line and I will start with a capital M. I will leave a space and write mom. I can find the sounds in mom: /m/ /o/ /m/. Mom starts with /m/ like moon. Turn and tell your partner what letter makes the /m/ sound. Yes! M. I will write m. /m/ /o/ /m/. The next sound I hear is /o/ like octopus. Turn and tell your partner what letter makes the /o/ sound. Yes! O. I will write the letter o. The last sound is /m/. We already know that the letter is m. I will write it down.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 33, there are examples of changing rhyming words by changing initial sounds. The following example demonstrates this: “Let’s try something different. I see May. What if we change the /m/ to /w/? What word would we have? Yes, way. May, way. Do they rhyme? Yes, because they sound the same at the end. What if we change the /w/ to /j/? Yes, jay. May, way, jay. Do they rhyme? Yes, because they  (sound the same at the end). They end with /ay/.”

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Basic Alphabet Knowledge Sample Script for Lesson 4, there are the following examples to help students practice initial sound sorting: “Now let’s think about sounds. You have a picture of ball and rope and tape and net. Point to the ball. The word ball starts with the sound /b/. Point to the rope. The word rope starts with the sound /r/. Point to the tape. The word tape starts with the sound /t/. Point to the net. The word net starts with the sound /n/. Now let’s use some other words. Say the word tip. Tip/ball, tip/rope, tip/tape, or tip/net? Point to the picture with the same starting sound. Right. Tip/tape. They both start with /t/. Say the word nest. nest/ball, nest/rope, nest/tape, or nest/net? Point to the picture with the same starting sound. Right. Nest/net. They both start with /n/.”

Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of most grade-level phonics standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Demonstrate basic knowledge of one-to-one letter-sound correspondences by producing the primary sound or many of the most frequent sounds for each consonant:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 38, the teacher presents picture cards and models identifying the initial sound. The teacher places the picture card under the appropriate heading. For example, the teacher presents a picture card for the word nest. The teacher says this is /n/ nest and places the card under the appropriate header. This process is repeated for toys, tools, turkey, nut, needle, girl, game, and gorilla

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 25, the teacher chooses four pictures from the Word Study Chart, representing each of the letter sound categories. The teacher calls out the name of the pictures without segmenting the initial sounds. The teacher instructs to write the correct initial sound.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 36, the teacher provides one-to-one letter-sound correspondence by producing the primary sound for /k/, /f/, /w/, and /e/. The teacher shows students each header card one by one. This week’s header cards are /k/ king, /f/ feet, /w/ whale, and /e/ egg. To introduce each header card, the teacher names the sound associated with each letter by stating the initial sound in each word, followed by the word.

  • Associate the long and short sounds with the common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 32, the teacher reviews short /u/. The teacher states, “This week we will work on reading and spelling three vowel patterns. The /ut/ pattern is at the end of the word nut, and it is spelled u-t.” The teacher repeats this procedure for the remaining header cards.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 41, the teacher reviews short /e/ by naming the sound associated with each letter pattern and telling how it is spelled. The teacher says, “This week we will work on reading and spelling three vowel patterns. The /et/ pattern is at the end of the word net and it is spelled e-t.” The teacher repeats this procedure for the remaining header cards.

  • Distinguish between similarly spelled words by identifying the sounds of the letters that differ:

    • No evidence was found.

Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 19, the teacher chooses three to five word-study words for students to practice writing on paper. The teacher models writing the word, and students practice writing individually on their paper.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 36, the lesson provides the teacher with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern.

    • Hear: The teacher introduces sounds associated with letters such as /t/ teeth, /t/ teeth, /t/ teeth by articulating the initial sound and saying the entire word three times.

    • Say: The teacher asks the students to say the word introduced, teeth.

    • Hear: After reading and discussing the poem, the teacher says that words rhyme when they sound the same at the end of a word. The teacher emphasizes the rhyme as they say each word: Were, her, sir. The teacher explains they all sound the same at the end because they all end with /ir/. The teacher also gives non-examples by providing words that do not rhyme and explaining that they do not sound alike at the end. Scarf, gown, old-fashioned. The teacher reads four lines from a poem read earlier and emphasizes the words that rhyme. The teacher explains that brown and town rhyme because they both have /own/ at the end. For students who struggle, the teacher reads phrases that include the rhymes only instead of entire lines.

    • Say: The teacher asks for examples of words that rhyme with words from the poem, such as brown and town. Encode: The teacher reminds students of the letters they are focusing on for the week: t, n, and g. The teacher has the students look for the letters in the poem. The teacher marks the letters in different colors and then has students identify more and mark them.

Indicator 1N.ii
01/02

Phonological awareness based on a research-based continuum (K-1).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1n.ii.

Materials include repeated instruction with frequent opportunities for students to practice phonological awareness skills throughout each lesson. Students chorally read poems and sing songs to practice phonological awareness skills. Students use Elkonin Boxes for phonemic awareness activities. Though the materials share a general sequence of instruction, the materials lack a clear, evidence-based explanation for the sequence of phonological awareness used in the program. Materials do not include opportunities for students to pronounce, blend, or segment syllables; however, there is evidence of these skills with phonemes. No evidence was found of isolating the initial, medial, or final sounds in three phoneme words.

Materials have a cohesive sequence of phonemic awareness instruction based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ application of the skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Building Phonological Awareness, page 48, the authors detail the hierarchy for the instruction of phonological awareness skills within the program. First, students learn to identify words in a sentence. Next, students learn to identify syllables within words. After that, students focus on onset-rime. Finally, students focus on the awareness of individual speech sounds by segmenting words into individual phonemes.

Materials do not contain a clear, evidence-based explanation for the expected hierarchy for teaching phonological awareness skills.

Materials include a variety of activities for phonological awareness. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Building Phonological Awareness, page 49, the authors explain how they apply the development of phonological awareness skills into their daily lessons through poems and songs. The text states, “Inclusive group language play allows students to build proficiency gradually in a low-risk environment. Students hear their peers participate, and they have age-appropriate models for each task until they, too, can accomplish the task.”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Building Phonological Awareness, page 49, the authors present the five-day sequence to build phonological awareness skills. The first two days focus on understanding and memorizing the poem. On the third day, students recite the poem and focus on rhyming words. On the fourth day, students recite the poem and count words and syllables. On the fifth day, students search for specific letters or topics related to the word study focus.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Understanding the Differentiated Instruction Block, page 150, the authors explain how to use the Differentiated Instruction Block manual to support phonemic and phonological awareness. Phonemic awareness lessons include printed letters. There are four sets of lessons included in the manual: basic alphabet knowledge, using letter sounds, using letter patterns, and dedicated sentences. Basic alphabetic knowledge lessons include singing, saying, and/or pointing to the alphabet, initial sound sorting, letter names and sounds, high-frequency words, and tracking memorized text. Lessons on using letter sounds include “Say It and Move It,” sounding and blending, and high-frequency words. Lessons on using letter patterns include oral blending and segmenting, teaching letter patterns, decoding practice, spelling, and high-frequency words. Lessons on dedicated sentences include building knowledge, co-constructing a sentence, independent writing, and closure.

There are frequent opportunities for students to practice phonological awareness. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Phonological awareness practice is in all lessons in the Kindergarten Shared Reading materials. Most lessons are teacher-directed with guided practice and supported student practice.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, students practice generic activities that include opportunities for using letter sounds such as sound matching, segmentation and blending, and sounding out and blending phonemes, onsets, and rimes.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, modules provide opportunities to practice phonological awareness in activities such as teaching poems and songs, making rhyming words, and counting words and syllables. Each lesson has a phonological awareness component.

Materials provide ample opportunities for students to practice each new sound and sound pattern. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Recognize and produce rhyming words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 8, the teacher and students chorally read a poem. The teacher reviews what rhyming words are and models identifying rhyming words. The teacher presents rhyming words from the poem (kite, night) and asks students to identify more words that rhyme. Students follow the same procedure for tip, that, dark, green,and June.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 18, the teacher and students chorally read a poem. The teacher reviews rhyming words and models rhyming words with examples and non-examples. The teacher presents rhyming words from the poem (sound and ground) and asks students to identify more rhyme words. Students follow the same procedure for fall, tree, light, and sweet.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 33, the teacher reads two lines of a poem and says, “Did you hear two words that rhyme?” The students respond, “Yes, _____ and _____ rhyme, because they _____ (sound the same at the end).” The teacher states, “Let’s make more rhyming words. Let’s think of words that rhyme with tree, be.” Students call out words.

  • Count, pronounce, blend, and segment syllables in spoken words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 9, the teacher and students chorally read a poem. The teacher reviews how to count words in a sentence and syllables in a word. Students practice counting words in a sentence. Students practice counting syllables in given words by clapping their hands for each syllable. Students count the number of syllables in the following words: flame, summer, night, firefly, nose

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher states, “Now I’m going to show you how to count syllables in words. Syllables are the parts or chunks of words. All words have syllables. Words can have one, two, three, or more syllables. We can count syllables by clapping our hands for each syllable. Listen: bucket. What word? Watch as I count the syllables in bucket.” The teacher claps his/her hands for each syllable. Then the teacher says, “How many times did I clap? Yes, two. Bucket has two syllables. Listen again.” Students clap and say the syllables in the word bucket.

    • There is no evidence of pronouncing, blending, or segmenting syllables. There is evidence of these skills with phonemes.

  • Blend and segment onsets and rimes of single-syllable spoken words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 33, the teacher presents words that rhyme. Students identify words that rhyme and share the rime at the end of the word. For example, the teacher presents the words pan and man, and students share that these words rhyme because they end in /an/.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 8, the teacher demonstrates how to change onsets to change rhyming words. This allows students to practice onsets and rimes with rhymes. For example, the teacher states, “Let’s try something different. I see top. What if we change the /t/ to /b/? What word would we have? Yes, bop. Bop, top. Do they rhyme?” The students respond, “Yes, because they sound the same at the end.” The teacher says, “What if we change the /b/ to /m/? Yes, mop. Top, bop, mop. Do they rhyme?” The students respond, “Yes, because they _____ (sound the same at the end). The teacher explains, “They end with /op/. Let’s try another one. I see why. What if we change the /w/ to /s/? What word would we have? Yes, sigh. Let’s change the /s/ to /t/. What word now? Yes, tie. Why, sigh, tie? Do they rhyme? Yes, because they _____ (sound the same at the end). They end with /igh/.”

  • Isolate and pronounce the initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in three-phoneme (consonant-vowel-consonant, or CVC) words. (This does not include CVCs ending with /l/, /r/, or /x/.):

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 28, the teacher models the word ran, holding up a finger for each phoneme. The teacher says the word and moves a marker for each sound, using an Elkonin Box. Students practice using the word ran. This procedure is repeated for pan, tan, gag, lag, zag, cap, tap, and nap.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 9, the teacher reviews “Say it and Move It” activities as they work on sounds within words, holding up a finger for each phoneme. The teacher states, “Today we will work with sounds. I am going to say a word. Then I am going to say the word slowly. Then I am going to say it and move it. Then you are going to say it and move it. The first word is hop. What word? I am going to say it slowly: Hold up a finger for each phoneme. /h/ /o/ /p/, hop. Now I am going to say it and move it.” Using the Elkonin box, the teacher moves a marker for each sound and says, “/h/ /o/ /p/, hop. Now it is your turn.” There is a teacher tip that suggests students can use manipulatives or fingers.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Using Letter Sounds Generic Lesson Plans, students have the opportunity to say and blend sounds in the activity “Sounding and Blending.” For example, the teacher says, “Now we will work with words. I want you to sound and blend each word. The way that you do that is you look at each letter, make each sound out loud, and then say the sounds fast to make a word. I’ll sound and blend each one, and then you’ll do it.” The teacher models how to sound out letters and then blend the sounds into words. Then students can sound out words on their own.

    • No evidence of isolating the initial, medial, or final sounds was found.

  • Add or substitute individual sounds (phonemes) in simple, one-syllable words to make new words:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 18, the teacher models changing the beginning sound in words using pot as an example and changing /p/ to /d/ and /k/. The teacher again models the word hears, changing /h/ to /g/ and /t/. Students respond to teacher prompts.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 33, the teacher guides the students to start with an, add /m/ to the beginning to get man, then change the /p/ to /r/ to get pan.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 8, the teacher uses rhyming words, bop and top, and substitutes the initial sounds, /b/ and /t/ to have students make new words.

Indicator 1N.iii
01/02

Phonics demonstrated with a research-based progression of skills (K-2).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1n.iii.

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply some grade-level phonics skills. Students have multiple opportunities to practice working with phonemes, substituting onsets and rime, and counting syllables. Some phonics skills, such as associating long and short vowel sounds with common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels and blending of CVC words, are referenced within the materials, but there are limited opportunities for students to practice these skills with written words and sentences. Students work with syllables and identify onsets and rimes within a syllable. Students practice identifying individual sounds using Elkonin boxes and structures to say and move sounds and blend words. There is limited instruction and practice about building, manipulating, spelling, and encoding in lessons. Additionally, there are minimal opportunities for students to practice distinguishing between similarly spelled words by identifying the sounds of the letters that differ. Students may have opportunities to apply grade-level phonics if the teacher uses activities from How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3; however, it is not guaranteed that all students will receive this instruction. Materials delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive sequence of phonics instruction and practice. The materials cite research studies to support the sequence.

Lessons provide students with opportunities to decode some (phonemes, onset and rime, and/or syllables) phonetically spelled words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Demonstrate basic knowledge of one-to-one letter-sound correspondences by producing the primary sound or many of the most frequent sounds for each consonant.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 26, the teacher shows students the following header cards: Ff feet, Jj jar, Ww whale. The teacher introduces each header card, names the sound associated with each letter, and places the card in the pocket chart. The teacher presents picture cards, and students identify the beginning sound and put the picture card under the appropriate header card.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 33, the teacher points to each letter in a word and says each sound aloud. The students follow this procedure for the remaining words.

    • In_ How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3,_ the teacher uses initial sound sorting to have students say each word, compare it quickly with the pictures, and then touch the picture with the same initial sound.

  • Associate the long and short sounds with the common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 32, the teacher introduces the week’s header cards: -ut, nut; -un, sun; -ug, bug. The teacher names the sound associated with each letter pattern and how it is spelled. The teacher introduces the sort word cards and reads each word. The teacher asks students which pattern they hear and places the card under that pattern. Students share how that pattern is spelled. Students practice with the remaining word cards and chorally read each word card, beginning with the header and each word with the pattern.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the teacher associates the patterns for long and short sounds with graphemes by teaching letter patterns. The teacher introduces the three patterns for the day. The teacher says each word and has students point to the word with the same pattern. The teacher says, “The pattern is ___, and I spell it with a/an ___.”

  • Distinguish between similarly spelled words by identifying the sounds of the letters that differ.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 38, the teacher guides students to change the first phoneme to make new words. Students change lost to_ cost, then to gost._

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 41, the teacher guides students to identify the last phoneme and categorize words under red or set.

Lessons provide students with frequent, yet often guided, opportunities to read complete words by saying the entire word as a unit using newly taught phonics skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 1, the teacher shows students cards with words and pictures. The teacher tells the students the word, then the teacher and students say the word together. The teacher uses the word in a sentence, and students and the teacher say the sentence together. While students are presented with words and read the word, students have no opportunity for independent practice without prompts or guidance.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 44, the teacher guides students through reading the word _set /s/ /e/ /t/, _then other short e words.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the five-minute initial sound starter lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to read complete words as they look at pictures and name them. Students also discuss other picture words that start with the same sound.

Lessons provide students with guided opportunities to decode words in a sentence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 38, the teacher and students chorally read a poem together. The teacher points to each word. Students read the poem chorally with the teacher and do not have an opportunity to practice independently.

  • No other opportunities for students to decode words in a sentence are present in the materials.

Lessons provide students with limited opportunities to build/manipulate/spell and encode words using common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns phonics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 25, the teacher presents students with four pictures from the word study chart. The teacher says the picture’s name, and the teacher asks students to think about the first sound. Students write the first sound and any other sounds they hear.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 19, the teacher uses the word study activity “Sound and Blend” to have students practice the _-op _pattern. They say it, move it, and blend it.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the teacher uses the five-minute instructional routines of initial sound sorting to look at pictures and name the letters in which those pictures begin.

Materials contain a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of previously taught grade-level phonics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Shared Reading Lesson Plans include methods to promote students’ practice of grade-level phonics skills. Methods include word sorts with picture and word cards and choral reading of poems.

  • The teaching resource How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3 includes the following instructional methods: choral echo responses, finger-pointing, physical gestures, Elkonin boxes, oral choral spelling, and spelling on dry erase boards.

Materials delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward the application of skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Kindergarten Word Study, page 58, the materials stats that word study begins with students learning what specific words mean and establishing them as part of the students’ receptive vocabulary. Students use words in oral language to build vocabulary. Students learn to “decode and eventually recognize automatically to establish a reading vocabulary.” Then, students learn to spell patterns and individual words to establish a writing vocabulary.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Kindergarten Word Study, page 58, the materials state that “our basic decoding instruction and practice will be accomplished during small-group differentiation.” In the kindergarten materials, “these opportunities will be enhanced systematically in word study.”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Appendix E, there is the following word study sequence:

    • Module 3, Unit 1, Lessons 11-15: _-at, -an _

    • Module 3/Unit 2:

      • Lessons 16-20: -at, -ag

      • Lessons 21-25:_ -at, -an, -ag_

      • Lessons 26-30: -ag, -an, -ap

    • Module 3/Unit 3:

      • Lessons 31-35: -it, -in

      • Lessons 36-40:_ -in, -ig_

      • Lessons 41-45:_ -it, -in, -ig_

    • Module 4/Unit 1

      • Lessons 1-5: -it, -in, -ip

      • Lessons 6-10: -ot, -op

      • Lessons 11-15: -op, -og

      • Lessons 16-20:_ -ot, -og, -op_

      • Lessons 21-25:_ -ut, -ug_

    • Module 4/Unit 2:

      • Lessons 26-30: -ut, -un

      • Lessons 31-35: -ut, -un, -ug

      • Lessons 36-40: -et, -ed

      • Lessons 41-45: -et, -en, -ed

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, activities progress from Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition to Word Recognition and Fluency, then to fluency and comprehension.

Materials have a clear research-based explanation for the order of the phonics sequence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Chapter 4, the materials include background knowledge on research involving word study. When talking about the importance of invented spelling, the text cites the work of developmental spelling researchers at the University of Virginia (Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, and Johnston) and Senechal, Ouellette Pagan, and Lever, and Lee and Scanlon.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, each Module begins with an overview that explains the progression for the order of sequence and how students move from phonological awareness to word study and spelling.

Materials provide sufficient opportunities for students to develop orthographic and phonological processing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the teacher begins with oral segmenting and blending to teaching letter patterns, then progresses to decoding and spelling, then to writing high-frequency words. Students have opportunities to develop their phonological and orthographic processing skills, as evidenced in the sample lessons.

  • No other evidence was found for students to develop orthographic and phonological processing.

Indicator 1N.iv
Read

Decode and encode common and additional vowel teams (Grade 2).

Indicator 1O
01/02

Materials, questions, and tasks provide explicit instruction for and regular practice to address the acquisition of print concepts, including alphabetic knowledge, directionality, and function (K-1), structures, and features of text (1-2).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1o.

Materials include tasks that provide some explicit instruction and practice in concepts about print. Letters are reviewed and presented to students in the lessons with teacher support. The materials lack opportunities for students to identify letters independently, and there is also a lack of explicit instruction in teaching all letters of the alphabet. Print concepts are modeled frequently with student practice in whole-class lessons, except for moving from page to page. Additional support in letter naming and print concepts can be found in the Differentiated Instruction materials; however, there is no guarantee that these lessons are taught to all students.

Materials provide students with some opportunities to engage in practice identifying all 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 38, the text details the Word Study portion of the Kindergarten Shared Reading Lesson Plans. The word study procedure is: “The teacher teaches letter names and sounds present in the sequence. Early in the year, students practice reciting the entire alphabet. Then they learn letters and sounds in sets, and engage with the teacher to sort pictures by initial sound to develop phonemic awareness. Teachers model handwriting for target letters.”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 57, the manual states that the first four weeks of Kindergarten focuses on the alphabet. Teachers engage students by singing and reciting the whole alphabet. First, the teacher and students sing the entire alphabet. Next, the teacher and students recite the whole alphabet. After that, the teacher and students recite the whole alphabet while the teacher tracks it on a chart.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, the students review the entire alphabet for the first 20 lessons. Then they are introduced to individual letters with repetition.

  • In the Shared Reading Lessons, Module 1, Lesson 24, Teaching Upper and Lowercase Letter Formation, the teacher demonstrates how to form each letter by telling students how to form each letter and how to write each letter on paper. The teacher models once and then works alongside students five more times for each new letter and three times for each review letter. The letters focused on are B, b, M, and m.

Materials provide opportunities to engage in practice locating all 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the class chorally sings the alphabet song without referencing an alphabet chart or list. The teacher asks students to repeat the letter names after the teacher says each letter. The teacher echo reads the letter names, referencing an alphabet strip/chart. Students then point to the letter on the alphabet strip/chart. The teacher displays a student’s name on a sentence strip. The teacher shows the sentence strip with the name and says the name. The class completes an echo reading of each letter while the teacher points to each letter. The teacher cuts the name into individual letters and matches the letters to the alphabet chart. The class completed another echo reading of each letter while pointing to the letters on the chart. The teacher organizes the letters, so they spell the student’s name. The class echo reads the letters while pointing. The class chorally reads the student’s name.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 25, the teacher tells students they will teach them how to find letters in the poem. The class chorally reads the poem, and students turn and tell a partner about the poem. The teacher reads the first four lines of the poem with students and touches the first letter of each word. The teacher tells students they will look for letters in the poem. The teacher asks the class to look through the poem and find the letters b and m, marking the letters when they are found. The teacher models looking for the letter b first. Students work to find the letter b and mark when found. The exact process is used for the letter m.

Materials provide opportunities to engage in naming all 26 letters (uppercase and lowercase). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 155, the manual details the basic alphabet knowledge in the Differentiated Instruction lessons. For Kindergarten students, these lessons are for learning grade-level content. The lessons follow the format: sing/say/point alphabet, initial sound sorting, letter names and sounds, high-frequency words, and tracking memorized text. In the sing/say/point alphabet portion, students spend three minutes singing the alphabet, echoing the letter names, echoing the letter names with alphabet shapes. For five minutes, the students complete initial sound sorting by saying each word, comparing it with the pictures, and touching pictures with the same sound. For the last two minutes, the teacher uses direct instruction to say the letter names and has students point to the letter. For three minutes, students practice high-frequency words. Finally, the students spend two minutes tracking memorized text and pointing to initial letters in each word.

  • In the Shared Reading Lessons, Module 1, Lesson 2, the teacher uses the students’ names to have them recognize their names and practice letters. Students are given their names on a sentence strip. The strip is cut into the letters. They match the letters to an alphabet strip and echo read them while pointing to each letter. Then in Module 1, Lesson 3, the teacher and students echo-read the letter names with reference to an alphabet chart, strip, or list. Then students point to the letter on the strip. This routine occurs in Lessons 1-10 of Module 1.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the teacher uses direct instruction to maximize the number of items completed in one or two minutes. The teacher first says the letter names and gives students points. Students should be able to do as many as 20 in a minute. Then the routine repeats with the letter sounds.

Materials contain some isolated, systematic, and explicit instruction for all 26 letters (recognize and name uppercase and lowercase). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 57, the manual states, “Alphabet activities are made more concrete by focusing on the names of the children in the class. For an individual child, the letters in their own name are the first to be learned.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, the first four weeks focus on the alphabet as a whole. Teachers engage the class in singing and then reciting the whole alphabet. Alphabet activities are made more concrete by focusing on the names of the children in the class. The teacher writes each child’s name on a sentence strip or piece of card stock. The teacher cuts the name into letters as a puzzle that can be reconstructed. Teachers introduce the letter puzzles to the whole class, highlighting two each day.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Planning Lessons to Develop Basic Alphabet Knowledge, the teacher facilitates two-minute drills with letter names and sounds. The teacher says the letter names and has students point to the letters.

There is a defined sequence for letter instruction to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, Appendix E, there is a defined sequence for letter instruction to be completed in a reasonable time frame over the school year. The following word study scope and sequence is included:

    • Module 1, Unit 1:

      • Lessons 1-25: b, m

      • Lessons 26-30: b, m, s

      • Lessons 31-35: m, s, r, a

      • Lessons 36-40: t, n, g

      • Lessons 41-45: n, p, i

    • Module 2, Unit 1:

      • Lessons 1-5: n, t, i, g

      • Lessons 6-10: m, b, t, a

      • Lessons 11-15: d, h, l

    • Module 2, Unit 2

      • Lessons 16-20: d, c, o

      • Lessons 21-25: l, h, c, o

      • Lessons 26-30: f, j, w

      • Lessons 31-35: f, w, k, e

    • Module 2, Unit 3

      • Lessons 36-40: f, w, k, e

      • Lessons 41-45: d, f, l, o, e

    • Module 3, Unit 1

      • Lessons 1-5: y, v, u

      • Lessons 6-10: y, v, u, z

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 59, the text states, “The scope and sequence distributes letters in sets to minimize confusion.” For example, b, d, and p are not taught at the same time. The authors considered “the utility of letters in reading and spelling. We teach the letter y late in the sequence, not because it comes at the end of the alphabet, but because it is not used as often as r and s.”

Materials include frequent and adequate tasks and questions about the organization of print concepts (e.g., follow words left to right, spoken words correlate sequences of letters, letter spacing, upper- and lowercase letters). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Follow words from left to right, top to bottom, and page by page.

    • In the Shared Reading Lessons Plans, Module 1, during Print Concepts instruction, students read nursery rhymes from the Mother Goose anthology that are selected for their complicated vocabulary and syntax and then used for a final specific purpose, rounding out the attention to emergent literacy. These rhymes are easy for students to memorize and use to practice their concepts of print. With teacher support, students practice finger-pointing, left to right, top to bottom, and return sweep. The work with nursery rhymes aims to have a full concept of words in print for all students by the end of the year.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 2, the teacher reads a poem while tracking under the words. The students echo-read the entire poem, following the teacher’s tracking left to right.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher asks the student to show where to start reading and demonstrates left to right progression.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 19, the teacher tells students they will be learning how to read text. The teacher reads a poem to students and asks students to talk about the poem. The teacher tells students that when reading, we start at the top of the page, and they point to the top line. The teacher tells students, “We find the first word by looking all the way to the left,” and they model pointing to the word Jack and telling students the first word is Jack. The teacher tells students, “We read across the top line from left to right,” and touches the first letter of each word to model how to do this. When the teacher gets to the end of the first line, the teacher tells students they have run out of words to read, so they should go to the next line and return all the way to the left. The teacher models moving to the next line and reading the second line of the text by finger-pointing. Students are invited up to the board to point to the top line, point to the second line, point to the next line, point to the last line, point to where you start reading on the last line and how to read this line and point to where you start reading on the top line and show with your finger how to read this line. The class chorally reads, “Jack and Jill,” and the teacher reminds students to start at the top and read from left to right.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 23, the teacher prepares the class to read a poem together. The teacher reads the poem to the class, finger-pointing while reading. Students turn and tell a partner about the poem. The class echo-reads the poem line by line. The teacher reads and tracks the first line with a finger, and students echo-read while the teacher tracks. This procedure is repeated for each line. The teacher moves to echo-reading two lines at a time. The class chorally reads the poem several times while the teacher tracks the print.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition, Basic Alphabet Knowledge, Figure 4.5 instructs teachers to use two minutes to track memorized text. The teacher uses either the provided sentences or a short, predictable book, teaches students the words, and has students say the words while pointing to the initial letter. Recognize that spoken words are represented in written language by specific sequences of letters. In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 3, the teacher states, “The first word is little. I read across the top line from left to right. I can touch the first letter of each word as I read.” Students use alphabet strips and a cut-up of their names to match the letters and see how their names consist of letters and sounds.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 4, the teacher tells students they will learn how to count words and syllables. The teacher chorally reads a poem, and students tell a partner about the poem. The teacher models counting the number of words in the first line of the poem. The teacher tells students they should do this by touching the first letter of each word when counting - the first letter comes after a space. The teacher models counting the first letter of each word and tells the students there are ___ words in the first line. The teacher follows the same procedure for several lines. Students are invited to the board to count the number of words in a line. Understand that words are separated by spaces in print.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 39, the manual details the concepts of print lesson structure for shared reading in Kindergarten. The structure is as follows:

    • The teacher shares a rhyme or poem, displayed for all students to see.

    • Lesson 1: The teacher reads the rhyme at least twice and discusses ideas with the students.

    • Lesson 2: The teacher engages students in echo reading and choral reading to memorize the rhyme.

    • Lesson 3: The teacher engages the children to recite the rhyme and teaches print concepts (finger-pointing, left to right, top to bottom, return sweep). Several students demonstrate.

    • Lesson 4: The teacher engages the children to recite the rhyme and teaches print concepts (finger-pointing, left to right, top to bottom, return sweep). Several students demonstrate.

    • Lesson 5: The teachers allow students to choose previous rhymes to demonstrate their fingerpoint reading.

  • In Shared Reading Lesson, Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher counts the number of words in the first line of the poem. The teacher touches the first letter of each word and counts. The teacher identifies the space after each word. The teacher uses the spaces and first letters of each word to count and show the students the number of words.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 5, the teacher explains how to know when it is a new word: “It is a new word because of the space.”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 10, the teacher chorally reads “Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush.” The teacher reminds the students to remember that when we read, we start at the top, read from left to right, and pay attention to the spaces.

Indicator 1P
02/04

Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity and sight-based recognition of high-frequency words. This includes reading fluency in oral reading beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1p.

Materials provide limited opportunities for students to practice automaticity and accuracy of grade-level decodable words through reading poems, sorting, and reading words with common letter patterns. Texts are often read first by the teacher, with echo or choral reading following; however, texts do not match the order of skills that are being taught. Students are not provided opportunities to read texts independently as part of the materials. The differentiated instruction lessons provide explicit teaching and student practice of high-frequency words; however, it is not certain that all students will receive this instruction. Not all students have multiple opportunities to read emergent-reader texts purposefully. Emergent level text is only available in the optional differentiation lessons, and these texts do not always closely match the sight words or word patterns that have been taught.

Some opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to purposefully read emergent-reader texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Read emergent-reader texts with purpose and understanding.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 1, the teacher starts the reading by having students look at the pictures. The teacher asks questions as students examine the pictures. For example, the teacher asks: “What are all these animals doing? Where is she going?”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 12, the teacher introduces a poem and reads the poem to students. The students turn and tell a partner about the poem. The teacher and student echo read the poem line by line. The class chorally reads the poem several times. The teacher checks for understanding by asking, “What do papa and mama want to be for New Year’s?” The class chorally reads the poem one or two more times.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 28, the teacher states, “Today I am going to teach you how to read text. First, we will chorally read the poem, and then you will turn and tell your partner what this poem is about.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 41, the teacher introduces the poem, “When Irish Eyes are Smiling.” The teacher reads the poem to students. The teacher reads lines 1-2 of stanza 2 two times to the students to teach meaning and memory. The teacher discusses unfamiliar ideas. The teacher reads the poem to the students, fingerpointing while reading. The teacher checks for understanding by asking, “What is your smile a part of? Where do you feel love? What does the poet say your smile does to the sunshine?” The teacher reads the poem to students.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, students who are assigned small group instruction for Targeting Word Recognition and Fluency read decodable text that includes a variety of decodable words, including words with short vowels and at least some words with blends and digraphs or r-controlled vowels, and VCe words. Not all students receive this instruction.

Materials provide limited support students’ development of automaticity and accuracy of grade-level decodable words over the course of the year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 15, the manual states, “We also chose a poem and a song for each week, drawing from two different anthologies. One of these texts would be used for phonological language play and the other for teaching concepts about print. We chose those selections so that students could memorize them, but we selected for complex academic language rather than decodable words, further enhancing sensitivity to English grammar. The difference between typical practice in kindergarten and Bookworms kindergarten shared reading texts is that each text is used to develop a specific competency, helping the teacher and students focus their attention.”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 47, the manual states, “The poems and rhymes we use were not written to teach any specific decoding skill, so the authors had free choice in their language.”

Materials include some systematic and explicit instruction of high-frequency words (e.g., the, of, to, you, she, my, is, are, do, does). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence was found for the instruction of high-frequency words for all students. Instruction of high-frequency words is found only in the differentiated instruction lessons in How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3.

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 70, the manual states, “One area of difference between Bookworms kindergarten and traditional practice is that we do not target memorization of high frequency words in kindergarten word study. You will see that we assess and teach high frequency word reading in our DI lessons, but we neither teach nor practice it in kindergarten spelling lessons. We do this so that our kindergarten students learn to spell from sound and because high frequency word spelling can be learned much more quickly and easily when students have stronger phonemic awareness and alphabetic knowledge. Addition of drill and practice of high frequency words will waste valuable time and derail the writing practice children do in ELA. They will spend all of their writing time asking the teacher how to spell specific words instead of applying their growing word knowledge and seeing themselves as writers.”

Students have some opportunities to read and practice high-frequency words in isolation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Read common high-frequency words by sight (e.g., the, of, to, you, she, my, is, are, do, does).

    • No evidence was found for the instruction of high-frequency words for all students. Instruction of high-frequency words is found only in the differentiated instruction lessons in How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3.

Materials do not include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words for all students to make reading progress.

Indicator 1Q
02/04

Materials, questions, and tasks provide systematic and explicit instruction in and practice of word recognition and analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1q.

The Kindergarten Bookworms materials include some systematic and explicit instruction in word recognition and analysis in connected texts and tasks. However, lessons with connected texts are only included in the Differentiated Instruction materials; therefore, it is not certain that all students will receive instruction in these materials or lessons. While connected texts are included in the Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans, the texts do not directly relate to the word recognition and analysis skills being taught and do not contain words related to that focus. There is no evidence that these skills or words are taught in a research-based progression.

Materials provide some support to students’ development to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills (e.g., one-to-one correspondences, syllable segmentation, rime and onset recognition, long and short sounds with common spellings and distinguish between similarly spelled words by identifying sounds of the letters) in connected text and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Demonstrate basic knowledge of one-to-one correspondences by producing the primary sound or many of the most frequent sounds for each consonant.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 11, the class learns two vowel patterns, the /at/ in cat, spelled a-t and /an/ in pan, spelled a-n. As the teacher introduces students to word cards, the teacher reads each word card aloud, without showing the students the word. They repeat the word and decide how to sort the words: hat/cat, hat/pan. hat/cat. Using a mixed order, the students repeat the process using the following words: mat, fat, sat, can, man, pan, van.

  • Associate the long and short sounds with common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels. Evidence was not found for all five vowels. Distinguish between similarly spelled words by identifying the sounds of the letters that differ.

    • No evidence was found.

Materials provide minimal opportunities to read high-frequency words in connected text and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: Evidence of instruction in high-frequency words is found only in Differentiated Instruction lessons. It is not certain that all students will receive this instruction. No evidence is found for instruction for all students in these skills.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Basic Alphabet Knowledge Generic Lesson Plan, page 51, the lesson begins with an alphabet review where students sing and point to letters of the alphabet. The second part of the lesson focuses on initial sound sorting. Next, the students practice letter names and sounds and high-frequency words. The lesson ends with students tracking memorized text. Using sentences or a short predictable book, the teacher teaches students the words, and students say the words while pointing to the initial letter in each.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Basic Alphabet Knowledge Generic Lesson Plan, Lesson 9, the students identify letters i, p, r, and a. The students identify high-frequency words in, is, you, that, and it. The students read the sentence, “That crayon is mine.”

Lessons and activities provide students with opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding (writing) in context and decoding words (reading) in connected text and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Student Workbook, page 197, the teacher instructs students to write a written response. The directions in the workbook say, “Draw a picture of the life cycle you think is the most interesting. Use your sounds to help you write some words that tell why you think that one is the most interesting.” The Shared Reading Lesson Plans do not specify when to use this workbook page.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 4, the teacher instructs students to count the number of words and determine the number of syllables in specific words using the weekly poem.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans Module 2, Lesson 30, students write sentences independently to create a four-sentence story. The teacher teaches word recognition and analysis strategies, including one-to-one correspondence for spelling sounds and common spelling patterns for long and short vowels to encode.

Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level phonics skills aligned to the program’s scope and sequence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Evidence of decodable texts is found only in differentiated instruction lessons. There is no certainty that every student will receive grade-level phonics instruction.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, materials include decodable texts for the following:

    • Blends and Digraphs: 29 passages

    • R Controlled Vowels: 29 passages

    • Vowel Consonant e: 14 passages

    • Long Vowel Teams: 29 passages

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Word Recognition and Fluency, Blends and Digraphs, students read the words tip, map, fin, shin, lag, bad, pig, kid, sham, mix, tap, rat, pin, bat, had. Students read a decodable text: “I saw a pig. The pig was big. It had a pink tail. It had a pink nose.”

Materials do not include decodable texts that contain grade-level high-frequency/irregularly spelled words aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.

  • Evidence of decodable text was found in Differentiated Instruction, but no evidence was found for whole-class instruction. Further, there is no certainty that these texts align to high-frequency/irregularly spelled words or a scope and sequence.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 102, it states, “We do not match our decodable text to our decodable instruction with much precision.”

Indicator 1R
02/04

Materials support ongoing and frequent assessment to determine student mastery and inform meaningful differentiation of foundational skills, including a clear and specific protocol as to how students performing below standard on these assessments will be supported.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1r.

The Kindergarten materials provide opportunities to assess students on most foundational skills. Assessments include the Informal Decoding Inventory, a test on letter names, a test on letter sounds, and a test on Fry Instant Words. However, except for a rubric that is available for teacher use, there are minimal opportunities to assess concepts about print. While the materials provide an Assessment Plan for each grade level, teacher guidance for assessment protocols are not clear or specific. While there are multiple assessments for a teacher to use over the course of the year, many are in the Differentiated Reading Instruction materials, and it is not certain that these assessments will be administered to all students. There are instructional supports and lessons in the Differentiated Reading Instruction materials.

Assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of foundational skills; however, there are minimal assessments on concepts of print. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include some assessment opportunities that measure student progress of print concepts.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 5, what to look for in an informal assessment is included in a teacher tip. “Students may use different props to finger point. We do not expect students to finger point accurately at this time of the year. We are just looking for top to bottom, left to right movement of the finger.”

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 31, the materials state that Concepts of Print should be assessed using a rubric to rate students during rhymes. This rubric should be used once a month until the student reaches proficiency. The rubric was not located.

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 67, the materials include a Kindergarten foundational skills rubric to “describe an individual student and a group of students across these skills.” Areas addressed related to print concepts include concepts about print and concepts of words.

      • For concepts of print, students receive “Excellent” if they can demonstrate top to bottom, left to right, and return sweep; “Good” if the student can demonstrate that top to bottom text organization; “Developing” if the student demonstrates book handling and can identify words as different from illustrations; “Emerging” if the student is inconsistent in book handling.

      • For concepts of words, students receive “Excellent” if with a memorized text, the student can locate any word by checking for initial consonant sound; “Good” if with a memorized text, the student can locate any word by pretend reading and fingerprinting; “Developing” if with a memorized text, the student can recite and fingerpoint accurately; “Emerging” if with a memorized text, the student demonstrates inconsistent tracking.

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 68, there is a rubric designed to measure students’ progress and mastery of print concepts. The concepts include book handling, differentiating between illustrations and words, and text organization from top to bottom, left to right, and return sweep.

  • Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonological awareness.

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 31, the materials state that Phonological Awareness should be assessed once a month until the student reaches proficiency using a rubric to rate students during poetry reading. The rubric was not located.

    • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 67, the materials include a Kindergarten foundational skills rubric to “describe an individual student and a group of students across these skills.” Areas related to phonological awareness include syllables, onset-rime awareness, and phoneme awareness.

      • For syllable awareness, a student is “Excellent” if with an orally-presented multisyllabic word, the student can segment the first syllable; “Good” if with an orally presented multisyllable word, then the student can count syllables; “Developing” if with an orally presented two-syllable word, the student can count syllables; “Emerging” if with an orally presented multisyllabic word, the student cannot yet demonstrate any syllable awareness.

      • For onset-rime awareness, a student is “Excellent” if with an orally presented single syllable word, the student can substitute the onset to generate a rhyming word; “Good” with an orally presented single syllable word, the student can segment an onset from a rime; “Developing” if with an orally presented single syllable word, the student can blend an onset and a rime; “Emerging” if with an orally presented single syllable word, the student cannot yet demonstrate any onset-rime awareness.

      • For phoneme awareness, a student is “Excellent” if with an orally presented word or set of phonemes, the student can segment and blend; “Good” if the student can blend three phonemes presented as separate phonemes; “Developing” if with an orally presented three phoneme word, the student can segment an initial phoneme; “Emerging” if with an orally presented three phoneme word, the student cannot yet demonstrate any phoneme awareness.

  • Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics and decoding.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 22, the assessments include Informal Decoding Inventory: Short Vowels through Vowel Teams; Informal Decoding Inventory: Multisyllabic Words; and Test of Oral Reading Fluency.

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the materials include the Test of Letter Names, page 31. The test presents students with 26 upper letters and 28 lower case letters (two forms of a and g).

    • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 32, the materials include a Test of Letter Sounds. The directions instruct the teacher to tell students the letters are upper- and lowercase letters and point to each letter set (capital/lower case letter) and ask, “What sound do these letters say?” Students may say either the hard or soft sound for c and g. The teacher records the student’s responses on a separate copy of the form. The assessment directions note that x and q are left out of the assessment as they are “difficult sounds to identify in isolation.”

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, page 10, the materials state, Word study assessments begin during Lesson 25. The teacher presents picture cards from the week’s Word Study lessons, name the picture, and ask the students to write the beginning sound they hear. The assessment is designed to assess how accurately students can represent initial sounds in words.

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 45, the word study assessment has the teacher call out seven words from the weekly list of -it, -in, and -ig words. Some of the words are pit, wit, kit, pin, sin, bin, win, pig, big, dig, and jig.

  • Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 33, the text includes the Test of Fry Instant Words. The assessment assesses “a student’s ability to recognize 300 frequently occurring words, as selected by Edward B. Fry. The words are grouped into three sets of 100 by relative difficulty, and each group of 100 words is, in turn, grouped into sets of 25.” Scoring and interpretation notes that there is “no cumulative score. Each word is actually a separate skill, which means that there is a direct link between testing and teaching. Any word that is not pronounceable automatically simply requires more practice!”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, the assessment plan has word study assessments every five days beginning in Lesson 25.

  • The K-1 Teacher Manual, page 15, states, “We made that design choice to enhance knowledge- and language-building opportunities while we were building expressive language in kindergarten and beginning reading fluency in first grade.” Therefore, there is no word recognition fluency assessed in Kindergarten.

Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current skills/level of understanding. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 21, the manual includes the assessment cycle for small group instruction. Screening assessments are completed for initial group placement. Diagnostic assessments for specific planning are completed as well as unit assessments to gauge learning and reevaluate group placement.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 22, the manual lists the following tests for Kindergarten students to be given depending on their reading ability:

    • Test of Letter Names - to determine which letters can be named when viewed in isolation.

    • Test of Letter Sounds - to determine which letters can be associated with the phonemes they represent.

    • K–1 Test of Fry Instant Words - to determine which high-frequency words can be pronounced quickly when they are viewed in isolation.

    • K–3 Informal Decoding Inventory:

      • Short Vowels through Vowel Teams: to determine the highest decoding skill set the student has attained in pronouncing one-syllable words of progressively more difficult patterns.

      • Multisyllabic Words: to determine proficiency in pronouncing two-syllable words of progressively more difficult patterns.

    • Test of Oral Reading Fluency - to determine speed and accuracy of reading aloud grade-level text.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, there is a rubric to assess students’ progress toward and mastery of concepts of print, concepts of word, syllable awareness, onset-rime awareness, phoneme awareness and retelling. This rubric is designed to use over time and for teachers to determine current skills/level of understanding and guide instruction to lead students toward mastery.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, the letter name assessment occurs in Module 1, Lesson 30. The assessment is individually administered to determine placement for future differentiated instruction lessons.

Materials support teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in foundational skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 23, the text illustrates strategies for forming groups in Kindergarten and half of Grade 1 based on assessments. If the student passed the vowel teams subtest of the Informal Decoding Inventory (IDI), the student should work on handwriting and spelling. If the student passed any lower subtest of the IDI, the student should be placed in the group for the lowest subtest they failed. If the student passed the test of letter sounds, the student should be placed in the using letter patterns group. If the student scored greater than 20 on the test of letter sounds, the student should be placed in the “Using Letter Sounds” group.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, page 28, materials state that after forming groups based on assessment data, the teacher should begin a 3-6 week instructional plan. Informal assessments should be completed during the last 15 minutes of the instruction. The last day of the cycle is for formal assessment in the areas being supported. If the student passes the assessment, the teacher advances the student to the next skill. If the student does not pass the assessment, the cycle repeats. If the student fails a second time, it is suggested that the cycle is repeated with a different teacher. If the student continues to struggle, it may be an appropriate time for an intervention.

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, the manual includes information on how to plan for various small, flexible reading groups that are created based on assessment data. An example is on pages 106-107. This section describes in detail how to plan for the “Blends and Digraphs Group and the R-Controlled Vowels Group.” Figure 5.5 on page 107 details the parts of the lessons, the rationale for the instructional items, and the actual instructional items.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 25, the materials include a Teaching Tip that states, “For any student who scores six correct or fewer on the assessment (spelling test of CVC words), consider using the Spelling Tool, Grades K-2 to analyze the student’s spelling performance and determine skill progression.”

Indicator 1S
02/04

Materials, questions, and tasks provide high-quality lessons and activities that allow for differentiation of foundational skills, so all students achieve mastery of foundational skills.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria for 1s.

The materials provide some suggestions for differentiating instructional materials, questions, and tasks when teaching foundational skills. In the K-1 Teacher Manual, there are several broad suggestions regarding how to scaffold the materials to meet the needs of students who struggle, students who are high-achieving, and English learners. While the K-1 Teacher Manual provides overall suggestions, teacher instructions are not specific or explicit in providing differentiated supports. The materials, questions, and tasks in the ELA or Shared Reading Lesson Plans do not support differentiation during core instruction or provide specific supports for students who read, write or speak a language other than English or who may otherwise struggle. The Differentiated Instruction Block provides targeted instruction for small groups, including students who struggle.

Materials provide some strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 72, the materials state, “Some students will struggle because they are multilingual. Shared reading is a time multilingual students will benefit because of the intense language exposure and opportunity. These students will benefit from the structures we have built into dialogic reading: word walk vocabulary instruction and scaffolded retellings with sentence frames. We built Shared Reading for language development, so multilingual learners will be well served.”

  • In the K-1 Teachers Manual, page 104, the text states that it is really different to engage the whole class in a group reading of the same trade book, rather than reserving books for guided reading matched to global instructional levels. Rather than changing the text level for students with weaker word knowledge, they use repeated reading and oral discussion to make text accessible.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 105, materials state that multilingual learners will have their foundational skills needs addressed during word study and the Differentiation Block. Shared Reading is a time of day with intense language exposure and opportunity. Multilingual learners may be able to track and read silently while the teacher reads chorally, and they will benefit from being partnered with a peer who will do the reading for them (while they track again) until they can begin to read chorally. Since Bookworms is not designed with a standards-mastery timeline, these students can be fully included in Shared Reading and increase their participation in practicing all standards as their language skills improve.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 126, the text states, “If you are serving a large number of newcomer multilingual learners, some may require a basic oral language intervention, one that cannot be provided by the classroom teacher. It may be wiser to schedule that intervention during ELA time rather than during Shared Reading. Shared Reading texts are slightly less complex and read more than one. Substituting a portion of grade-level instruction with intervention will always have implications, though. This substitution can only be possible if there are additional teachers to provide the oral language intervention.”

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Chapter 4: Targeting Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition, pages 45-48, the text describes methods for grouping students and strategies for teaching phonics, decoding, and spelling skills in small, targeted groups. There are lesson plans and assessments. This instruction exists for all struggling students, but it is not specific to students learning English.

Materials provide some strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level foundational skills and to meet or exceed grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 31, the text states that Kindergarten shared reading will provide ample opportunities to document student attainment of additional foundational skills. The materials provide a reporting sheet for teachers to use during instruction.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 71, the text addresses how to support students who struggle. The text states, “Teachers have to first get all the Shared Reading teaching procedures down pat, then let students get accustomed to a new way of spending time and energy, and then see who is struggling. When the students are identified, it is worth the time it takes to consider the source of the struggle before planning a support system.” The text lists the following as reasons why students may struggle:

    • All students will struggle if they don’t feel respected and supported by their teacher.

    • Some students will struggle because they lack reading stamina.

    • Some students will struggle because they enter the grade level with foundational skills deficits.

    • Some students will struggle because they have disabilities related to language and literacy.

    • Some students will struggle because they are adding English to their knowledge of a home language.

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 72, the text states, “What our strategies for supporting students have in common is that they ask teachers to consider how a student who needs additional support can still participate as fully as possible. We don’t substitute a different, easier text or task. We don’t change pacing. We create a community where all students can thrive.”

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 105, the text states, “Some students will struggle because they enter the grade level with foundational skills deficits. We anticipate that there will be some students in a first-grade class with very weak alphabet knowledge. You will know who these students are, and you will address their needs directly during word study and during the DI Block. It will not help to try to modify the goals or structures of Shared Reading for them. They will still benefit from Shared Reading, though, because they will be building concepts of print, background knowledge, specific vocabulary knowledge, grammatical knowledge, and story structure knowledge. Decide what is the most challenging task they can do during repeated reading (e.g., track the text with a finger as the teacher reads, or whisper read at a pace slightly behind the teacher, as an echo). Then decide how to release slightly more responsibility to them during partner rereading.” The text further states that “if students are weak, use the same goal-setting strategies that you use for other students building stamina, always identifying a participation strategy that is appropriate during the initial reading segment and during the rereading. Students may have to listen during the echo or choral reading and then listen again and fingerpoint during rereading. Some students may have to take breaks during shared and partner reading; work with them to make those breaks routine and unobtrusive to the rest of the students.”

  • In How to Plan Differentiated Reading Instruction: Resources for Grades K-3, Chapter 4: Targeting Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition, pages 45-48, the text describes methods for grouping students and strategies for teaching phonics, decoding, and spelling skills in small, targeted groups. There are lesson plans and assessments.

Materials provide some extensions and/or advanced opportunities to engage with foundational skills at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the K-1 Teacher Manual, page 72, the text addresses how to support students with high achievement. The text states, “In Dialogic Reading, teachers can ask especially sophisticated questions of them, provide language scaffolding to enhance the grammatical contexts in which they embed vocabulary words, and allow them to demonstrate retellings. They can assign text connections to these students as written work even early in the year when other students are doing these tasks orally.”

  • No other evidence was found.

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

Across the program, some texts are organized around knowledge-building topical units, though most are organized around a theme. Students have opportunities to analyze key ideas and details and the integration of knowledge and ideas within and across texts, though their opportunities to analyze craft and structure are limited. In the ELA units, students complete culminating tasks, which sometimes require them to use texts and/or knowledge from the Shared Reading lessons. These culminating tasks are written in nature and sometimes incorporate research skills, but the focus is on applying the traits of informative writing rather than building students’ research skills. Materials include a standards coverage document that indicates how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules. The majority of instruction across the year falls within grade-level aligned standards, but materials do not address all of the grade-level standards. Materials also provide documentation for flexible schedules that indicate how to implement Bookworms on a reduced schedule, but there is no guidance as to how students would master all grade-level standards if lessons were omitted.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

16/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

In Shared Reading, some texts are organized around a topic, while others are organized around a theme. In ELA, units often build knowledge about text structures. Although students have many opportunities to analyze key ideas and details through questions and retell opportunities, students have limited opportunities to analyze craft and structure within texts and across texts. Throughout the materials, students have opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge both within individual texts and across multiple texts. Students complete culminating tasks in ELA, though some require students to use texts and/or knowledge from Shared Reading. Culminating tasks rarely integrate speaking and listening and heavily focus on language standards. Although materials cover a year’s worth of writing instruction, materials do not thoroughly address all of the writing grade-level standards throughout the year. There are minimal lessons throughout both ELA and Shared Reading that support students in growing their research skills. Students do not conduct research to answer a question; rather, the research task focuses on ensuring students can identify, evaluate, and apply traits of informative writing. Some of the research projects are culminating tasks and do not help build students’ research skills.

Indicator 2A
02/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2a.

In both the Shared Reading and ELA modules, some units are organized around topics to build knowledge, while others are organized around a theme; however, some units are not cohesively organized to build knowledge or do not build knowledge on the intended topics. In ELA, units often build knowledge around text structures. Text sets within each unit typically include three texts, with some units including one or two texts. The limited volume of texts and varying number of lessons for each text could impede students’ ability to build knowledge.

Some texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 1, texts are connected by the topic, insects. Students read one informative text and two fantasy texts including A Bee’s Life by Donna Herwek and Super Fly Guy by Tedd Arnold. 

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Unit 3, students read books about life cycles, including Caterpillar to Butterfly by Laura Marsh and From Tadpole to Frog by Wendy Pfeffer. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Unit 1, students read a variety of narrative stories that are connected because they all have “narrative story structure.” Texts in this module include Caps for Sale by Esphyr Siobodkina, Frederick by Leo Lionni, and The Full Belly Bowl by Jim Aylesworth. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Unit 1, students listen to a variety of informational texts that describe different aspects of our world such as Clouds by Anne Rockwell and Follow the Water from Book to Ocean by Arthur Dorris. 

Some texts are connected by a theme. Examples include, but are not limited to the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Unit 1, students read several biographies about women who make a difference. Texts in this unit include Dancing Hands by Margarita Engle, which is a biography about Teresa Carreno and Daring Amelia by Barbara Lowell, which is about Ameila Earhart. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 4, students read texts about bravery, such as Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes and Happy Birthday Martin Luther King by Jean Marzollo. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Unit 2, students listen to various stories focused on the theme of “Wonderful You.” Texts in this unit include Career Day by Anne Rockwell, A Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon, and Leo the Late Bloomer by Robert Kraus. 

Some texts are not connected to a grade-appropriate cohesive topic or a theme. Examples include, but are not limited, to:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Unit 3, the unit overview indicates that students will learn about how “authors use onomatopoeia to describe sounds in a story” by chorally reading Roadwork by Sally Sutton and Rap a Tap Tap by Leo and Diane Dillon. The lessons miss opportunities to focus on this skill to build knowledge, as the materials do not explicitly address onomatopeia until the written assessment for each text.

Indicator 2B
02/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.

Although students have many opportunities to analyze key ideas and details through questions and retell opportunities, students have limited opportunities to analyze craft and structure within texts and across texts. No evidence was found of students recognizing common types of texts, naming the author and illustrator of a story, or identifying the cover, back cover, and title of a page.

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 26–30, students listen to the literary text, Paddington Sets Sail by Michael Bond. Students answer several questions about details while listening to the text including, “Why did the kids and Paddington cheer? Why do you think he put his hat on top? How do you think Paddington felt when he woke up? Why was there a crowd at the pier?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 6–10, students listen to the literary text Hi! Fly Guy by Tedd Arnold. After each page, the teacher asks students what is happening to support their retelling. Then after listening to the text, students respond to questions such as, “Did Fly Guy really know Buzz’s name? How would you feel if you were Buzz? Why did the judges finally let Fly Guy in the show?”

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 31–35, students listen to the text From Tadpole to Frog by Wendy Pfeffer. After each page, the teacher asks students what is happening. Then students engage in an oral language retell. The teacher provides sentence prompts to support students in this activity. Then after completing the retelling frame with students, students reread/recite the full retelling.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 26–30, students listen to the literary text Have you Seen my Dinosaur? by Job Surgal. Afterwards, the teacher asks students what happens first, next, then, and finally. Students discuss their responses with a partner. Then the teacher generates 1–2 sentences for students to repeat orally after the teacher.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 23–25, after students listen to Forest Bright, Forest Night by Jennifer Ward, the teacher and students make an anchor chart that lists the animals that are awake during the day and those that are awake during the night.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 11–13, during the interactive read-aloud of Can we Ring the Liberty Bell? by Martha E.H. Rustad, students respond to questions such as, “Where can you see the actual Liberty Bell? Why does every state keep a copy of the Liberty Bell hanging in the capital?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 36–37, students listen to How a Seed Grows by Helene Jordan. After the read-aloud, during the Respond Together section, the teacher and students draw and write about the seed growing process based on information from the text. The prompt states, “Draw a series of pictures showing the steps of planting a seed and growing it into a plant.” During the interactive read aloud, students answer questions such as, “What will our first step be? What about our second step? What would happen if we didn’t follow the steps in order?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 6–8, students listen to Follow the Water from Brook to Ocean by Arthur Dorris. While listening to the text, students respond to questions such as, “What can a river move bsides water and canoes? What else can people do in a river besides boating and swimming?” Then during the discussion, students respond to the following questions: “What is water important to us? What do we use water for? Is it important for plants and animals? Why?”

For most texts, students rarely analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 36–40, students learn about onomatopoeia after reading Roadwork by Sally Sutton. Students look back in the book to see if they can find examples of onomatopoeia. Then, students choose one of the words and draw a picture of something that makes that sound.

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.

Throughout the Kindergarten materials, students have opportunities to analyze the integration of knowledge both within individual texts and across multiple texts. During both Shared Reading and ELA, while students listen to the text, the teacher pauses multiple times to ask questions to help build knowledge. Students use both the text and the illustrations to do this. Students have several opportunities in each module in both ELA and Shared Reading to analyze knowledge across multiple texts.

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, while listening to Roadwork by Sally Sutton, the teacher reads each page of the text aloud and displays the picture. The teacher uses the sentence frame for each page. Students use the pictures to orally complete the sentence frame. On pages 1 and 2 of the text, the teacher reads “the workers plan ____.” Students should respond with “the road.”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 6–7, while listening to Frederick by Leo Lionni, students look at the illustrations and answer the questions, “Which one is Frederick? How do you know?” Then later in the lesson, students look at the illustrations again and answer the following questions: “Which of the mice is Frederick? How do you know? Why are the others there with their eyes closed?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 36–38, while listening to Sheila Rae, the Brave by Kevin Henkes, students respond to the following questions: “What are some of the ways that Sheila shows she is brave? Look at the illustrations. Do you think Louise is brave in the beginning of the story? How come?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 31–33, while listening to A Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon, students look at the illustrations and answer the question, “How would you describe what the children are thinking?” After the read aloud, students respond to the following questions: “How would you describe how some of the children are feeling? How is Camilla feeling?”

Most sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 11–15, students respond to the following prompt: In A Bees Life by Dona Herweck Rice the author includes photographs of real bees. In _Hi! Fly Guy _by Tedd Arnold and Super Fly Guy by Tedd Arnold the author/illustrator draws a fly that does not look exactly like a real fly. Why do you think the authors made different choices about the pictures in the book? Which type of book about insects do you like better - books that tell real information… or books that tell a made up story… ?” Students “identify basic similarities in and differences between two texts on the same topic” in the first part of the prompt.

  • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 41–45, after reading several stories about animal sidekicks including Have you Seen My Dinosaur? by Job Surgal and Henry and Mudge and the Wild Wind by Cynthia Rylant, students respond to the following questions: “Who is the animal sidekick in Tarra & Bella? How do you know? How is Bella different than other animal sidekick characters we have seen before?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 21–22, after reading George Washington: Our First President by Garnet Jackson and Wind Flyers by Angela Johnson, students discuss the similarities and differences between Geroge Washington and the Tuskegee Airmen. Students discuss the following questions with a partner: “How are George Washington and the Tuskegee Airmen the same?” and “How are Geroge Washington and the Tuskegee Airmen different?”

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 11–14, students listen to Follow the Water from Brook to Ocean by Arthur Dorris and Clouds by Anne Rockwell. After reading Clouds, students discuss the connections between clouds and water. Students are asked, “Why is water important for clouds? Why are clouds important for water?”

Indicator 2D
02/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2d.

Students complete culminating tasks in ELA, though some require students to use texts and/or knowledge from Shared Reading. All four culminating tasks are limited to writing tasks. The Module 1 culminating task includes one text from Shared Reading. The Module 2 and 3 culminating tasks integrate texts from both ELA and Shared Reading.  In Module 4, students reflect on themselves as a leader through a narrative writing piece but do not integrate what they learned in the module; students can successfully complete the culminating task without demonstrating knowledge of the Module 4 topic and texts. Culminating tasks rarely integrate speaking and listening and heavily focus on language standards.

Culminating tasks are evident, but are not varied across the year and are sometimes multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 44–45, students spend two days on the culminating task. With teacher support, students link subjects with predicates to create sentences that retell My Trip to the Hospital by Mercer Mayer and then draw a picture that aligns to the sentence. The next day, students match different subjects and predicates about the same text and illustrate their sentence. This culminating task focuses on the knowledge students learned about retelling and composing sentences. While the culminating task assesses story comprehension and understanding complete sentences, it does not integrate speaking and listening standards. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 44–45, students spend two days on the culminating task. On the first day, students work with the teacher and a partner to create an opinion sentence with an illustration using the text Happy Birthday, Martin Luther King by Jean Marzollo. On the second day, students independently write an opinion sentence with an illustration using the Shared Reading text Rap a Tap Tap by Leo and Diane Dillon. Students must demonstrate their knowledge of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Bill Bojangles Robinson, as well as their comprehension of two different texts and the opinion writing genre. The culminating task does not integrate speaking and listening standards.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 44–45, during the culminating task, students write an informative piece based on information they learned about the plant cycle from the texts How a Seed Grows by Helene Jordan, In a Nutshell by Joseph Anthony, and How Plants Grow by Dona Herweck Rice. On the first day, students write a topic sentence. On the second day, students write an additional sentence with a fact about the plant life cycle. This culminating task assesses students’ knowledge of the plant life cycle, comprehension of three texts from Shared Reading and ELA, and the informative writing genre. Students have the opportunity to share their writing with a partner.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 26–30 and Lessons 42–45, students complete two culminating tasks. In the first culminating task, students select a book from any time in the year and plan, write, and revise a Book of the Year commercial. Students present their commercials and respond to other students’ commercials. In the second culminating task, students write about how they have changed and grown as readers and writers over the course of the year. Students use the text Leo the Late Bloomer by Robert Kraus as an exemplar but do not integrate knowledge or comprehension of Module 4 texts during the culminating task. Students brainstorm, write, and revise their narrative piece and share their progress with a partner daily. The knowledge assessed in this culminating task includes narrative text structure, sentence composition, and self-reflection; however, the task does not require students to demonstrate their knowledge of the topics covered throughout the module.

Indicator 2E
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.

Although materials cover a year’s worth of instruction, materials do not thoroughly address all of the writing grade-level standards throughout the year. In the beginning of the year, students identify parts of a sentence and then begin composing simple opinion and factual sentences. Toward the end of the year, students write multiple related sentences with illustrations. Writing lessons follow a gradual release model and include teacher modeling with guided practice and a student work session. Students write in response to a text every fifth day in Shared Reading, with the complexity and rigor of their responses transitioning from illustrations, to sentence frames, to more independent writing across the year. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in process writing halfway through the year, although editing and revising instruction does not occur until Module 4. Both Shared Reading and ELA materials support writing instruction through the use of model texts, word-for-word scripts, Teaching Tips, and rubrics to assess writing.

Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. However, not all standards are covered throughout the year and some standards are not addressed until the second half of the year.  Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • According to the Bookworms K–1 Teacher’s Manual, writing instruction includes modeling, work sessions, and sharing. This structure includes explicit instruction in sentence-level composition that is modeled throughout the year and teaching students how to evaluate their writing based on the genre of writing, which begins in Module 4. 

  • Materials include 21 lessons on opinion writing, 24 lessons on narrative writing, and 21 lessons on informative writing, though process writing is not addressed until Module 4. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, students learn how to form sentences using subjects and predicates. In this module, students complete two opinion writing pieces, two informative writing pieces, and one narrative writing piece. In all five writing opportunities, the teacher guides students to compose sentences by identifying and combining phrases that are subjects and phrases that can be predicates. Then students draw pictures to illustrate the sentences. Students use this process of combining subjects and predicates throughout all of Kindergarten. According to the Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual, this helps lay a firm foundation for genre-specific writing instruction. This writing instruction helps them complete their first culminating writing task where they retell a story. They put the story events in chronological order and illustrate the setting. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, students continue working on sentence construction and apply that to the informative genre. They start by writing facts about texts they hear in Shared Reading, and by the end of the unit, they create a how-to book based on the text Building with Dad. Writing voves away from arranging premade subjects and predicates to convey ideas to students using letter sound to spell words. Students complete two opinion pieces, two narrative writing pieces, and three narrative pieces. In Module 2, students learn how to write opinion pieces where they write about their favorite character in books. This supports the culminating task where they write an opinion sentence about the text Rap a Tap Tap by Leo and Diane Dillion. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, students continue to learn how to construct sentences, and pre-made lists of subjects and predicates to support genre writing is taken away. Students write three opinion pieces, three informative pieces, and two narrative pieces. Students demonstrate their understanding of the opinion writing genre in the culminating task where they write a book review of one of the texts in this module. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, students begin writing their own sentences with a subject, predicate, and supporting details. Students also learn how to evaluate and revise their writing using a sentence checklist. Students have opportunities to write three opinion pieces, three narrative pieces, and three informative pieces. The opinion writing lessons continue to build toward the culminating task where students identify one book read throughout the entire year and write why it should be considered the Book of the Year.  

Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, writing lessons follow the same structure throughout the year and include modeling, a student work session, and sharing.

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, during modeling, the teacher models one aspect of writing. Materials always provide a script for teacher use, such as in Module 1, Lesson 38, where the teacher explains that narratives tell what happened and models thinking about what happens first, next, and last. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, modeling and work session plans often include Teaching Tips to personalize the instruction, such as in Module 3, Lesson 3, where Teaching Tips guidance recommends that the teacher forms a small group to help students with either subject/predicates, finding sounds to spell words, or rereading sentences to see if it makes sense. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, each lesson ends with a chance for students to share what they have accomplished during the lesson. According to the Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual, the purpose of students sharing their work is to help students reflect on their writing skills and set goals for improvement. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, materials include genre-specific rubrics/checklists for narrative, opinion, and informational writing. In Kindergarten, the teacher and students apply the checklists to students’ sentence-level writing and drawing. Although students learn how to use the sentence writing checklist so they can assess their own writing, this instruction does not occur until Module 4, Lesson 25. In this lesson, students write an informative piece on Harriet Tubman and the teacher models how to use the sentence writing checklist to evaluate and improve writing. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 4, lesson guidance references the Informative Writing Rubric to support the teacher with evaluating students’ informative writing on three facts. Guidance also recommends that the teacher collects this writing task as a baseline informative writing sample to compare with future informative writing pieces to determine students’ progress over time. 

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 23, students learn how to write opinion sentences to create book reviews. Materials include the following sentence frame: “_______ is a _______ book.”

Indicator 2F
02/04

Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students' knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2f.

There are minimal lessons throughout both ELA and Shared Reading that support students in growing their research skills throughout the Kindergarten materials. While some lessons address research skills such as gathering information to answer a question, these lessons are limited across the entire year. Some of the lessons that focus on helping students engage in shared research or writing to develop research skills address the standards, but the standards are not the focus of the lesson; instead, the focus is more on the skill of writing complete sentences. Students do not conduct research to answer a question; rather, the research task focuses on ensuring students can identify, evaluate, and apply traits of informative writing. Some of the research projects are culminating tasks and do not help build students’ research skills.

Some research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • With guidance and support from adults, recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 44–45, the teacher works with students to generate a list of predicates to match the subject of one of an interactive read-aloud text, Martin Luther King, Jr. The teacher may add a visual clue to each predicate, if it will help students. The teacher and students practice putting a subject and different predicates together to make complete sentences. Then, the teacher models counting the number of words in a sentence, drawing a line for each word, leaving a space in between each line, and putting a period after the third line. The teacher models using the text and the co-constructed list of predicates to write the sentence, Martin was smart. The teacher and students repeat this process using Bojangles as the subject.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 44–45, students work with the teacher to generate a list of abbreviated facts, using the information they learned from listening to How a Seed Grows by Helene Jordan, In a Nutshell by Joseph Anthony, and How Plants Grow by Dona Herweck Rice. The teacher draws visual clues next to the facts on the anchor chart. The teacher models how to choose a question to ask the reader to give the reader a clue that their informative writing will be about the life cycle of a plant. The teacher models how to count the number of words in the sentence, where to start writing the sentence, and how to use the text and letter-sound knowledge to write the words in the sentence. The teacher repeats this process when modeling how to write two facts about plants.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 3–5, the teacher writes a list of student-generated facts about animal sizes, after reading aloud Actual Size by Steve Jenkins. The teacher models how to turn a list of facts into complete sentences, specifically a topic sentence and supporting detail sentences.

Materials minimally support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 18–19, additional information is provided about each American included in the appendices of the book. In the Teaching Tips section, materials include additional information to help students develop knowledge on a topic, such as suggesting teachers share some of Georgia O’Keeffe’s artwork with students, explain to students that Maya Lin is an artist and architect who designed the Vietnam memorial in Washington D.C., and show students pictures of the memorial.

Materials include some shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., explore a number of books by a favorite author and express opinions about them). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 26–30, after listening to Pete’s Chair by Ezra Jack Keats, students complete a shared writing activity. Students share their opinion about the three Ezra Jack Keats books they read so far, including information about the main characters. Then students pick their favorite book and independently write about why it was their favorite book.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 44–45, during the culminating task, students create an informational text that teaches readers about plants. Students generate a list of facts together using the books In a Nutshell by Joseph Anthony, How a Seed Grows by Helene Jordan, and How Plants Grow by Dona Herweck Rice. Then, students independently write their sentences using the facts.

    • In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 3–5, students discuss the size of animals after reading Actual Size by Steve Jenkins. The teacher manual indicates that teachers and students could research a few additional animals and measure how big they are with masking tape.

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

04/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Instruction throughout the materials focuses on content that falls within grade-level aligned standards; however, materials do not address all of the grade-level standards. Most writing standards encompass explicit instruction, tasks, and assessed skills, but speaking and listening opportunities are limited. Materials include a standards coverage document in the Appendix of the Teacher Manual, which allows the teacher to see how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules. Materials include 180 lessons in ELA and 180 lessons in Shared Reading. While this could conceivably be completed in a school year, there is no time allotted for interruptions to the school year or reteaching. Core learning takes place during the Shared Reading and ELA blocks, for a total of 90 minutes a day, but some tasks from those blocks must be finished during the Differentiated Instruction block. Materials also provide flexible schedule documentation, though it is unclear whether students would master all standards if lessons were omitted.

Indicator 2G
02/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.

Instruction throughout the materials focuses on content that falls within grade-level aligned standards; however, materials do not address all of the grade-level standards. Most writing standards encompass explicit instruction, tasks, and assessed skills; however, speaking and listening opportunities are limited. Reading standards are addressed through instruction and questions and tasks but are not always addressed through assessments. Some standards are explicitly taught, while others have questions and tasks but no explicit instruction. Each lesson in Shared Reading and ELA has multiple standards tagged, making it difficult for schools and teachers to know what the priority or focus standard might be and leaving it up to educators to determine which standard is aligned to which instruction, question, task, and assessment item. In addition, outside of the writing rubrics that accompany the culminating tasks in ELA and smaller writing assignments in Shared Reading, there is no mechanism for teachers to determine whether a student has mastered a standard. However, the materials do include a standards coverage document in the Appendix of the Teacher Manual, which allows the teacher to see how standards repeat across lessons, units, and modules.

Over the course of each unit, some instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In the Appendix of the Bookworms K-1 Teacher Manual, the materials provide the standards by lesson for both the Shared Reading and ELA lessons, but it is unclear which standards listed are the priority and to which part of the instruction they align.

  • Shared Reading materials primarily address instruction aligned to RL.K.3 in Module 1. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 30, after listening to Paddington Sets Sail by Michael Bond, the teacher models the retelling process for students. The teacher models using the words first, next, then, and finally. Instruction on this standard also occurs in ELA. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 26, the teacher models making an anchor chart after reading aloud Giggle, Giggle, Quack by Doreen Cornin. The teacher writes down the main characters and setting. The teacher also explains that most stories have characters that have a problem to solve and then asks what the problem was in this text. 

  • Shared Reading materials lack evidence of explicit instruction aligned to RI.K.3; however, ELA materials include explicit instruction aligned to this standard. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 1–2, while listening to A Log’s Life by Wendy Pfeffer, the teacher pauses when they come across a plant or animal in the text to decide if it is a plant or animal. The teacher then writes it on a chart to keep track. 

  • Shared Reading materials lack evidence of explicit instruction aligned to RL.K.6 and RI.K.6. ELA materials include minimal explicit instruction aligned to RL.K.6; ELA materials lack evidence of explicit instruction aligned to RI.K.6 is not taught in ELA. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 6, the teacher reads aloud Frederick by Leo Lionni. Prior to reading, the teacher explains that it was written and illustrated by Leo Lionni and that the writers write the words and the illustrator draws the pictures.  

  • ELA materials include explicit instruction aligned to W.K.1 across all four modules. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 23–25, 29–30, and 34–35, the teacher models writing about their favorite book by first soliciting the reasons students like the books in the Module. Then the teacher models writing using one of the reasons. Afterwards, the teacher provides a sentence frame for students to do the same thing on their own. 

  • ELA materials include explicit instruction aligned to W.K.2. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 9, the teacher explains that when students write a how-to book, they explain how to do something in the order that the task should be completed. 

  • ELA materials include explicit instruction aligned to W.K.5 at the beginning of Module 4. In the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 5, the teacher introduces the terms revising and editing and models how to use a checklist to revise and edit work. 

  • Module 2 and Module 4 of the ELA materials provide explicit instruction aligned to W.K.7. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lessons 44–45, the culminating task is to convey a fact about the plant life cycle based on information that they learned from three Shared Reading texts. The teacher models writing a sentence about plants. 

  • Shared Reading and ELA materials lack evidence of explicit instruction aligned to SL.K.4  and SL.K.5. 

Over the course of each unit, some questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans provide opportunities for students to answer questions and complete tasks aligned to RL.K.3. For example in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lesson 45, after listening to My Trip to the Hospital by Mercer Mayer, students “read the book by telling what is happening on each page.”

  • Students have some opportunities throughout ELA to answer questions and complete tasks that align to RI.K.1. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 1, Lessons 21–22, students listen to A Tree for All Seasons by Robin Bernard. Students compare and contrast the seasons while listening to the text. Guiding questions include, “How is spring different from winter?” and “How is summer similar to, or the same as, spring?” 

  • Shared Reading and ELA materials provide opportunities for students to complete writing tasks that align to W.K.1. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 15, after listening to Super Fly Guy by Tedd Arnold, students draw a picture of their favorite book from the Insects Unit. The illustration must show why they liked that book. 

  • Students have opportunities throughout ELA to write informative writing pieces  that align to W.K.2. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 15, students write a Cloud Observation Report using information from the book Clouds by Anne Rockwell. 

  • Students have minimal opportunities to complete tasks that align to W.K.5. Students begin engaging with this standard in Module 4 of Shared Reading. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lesson 25, students work with a partner to make sure their own sentences have subjects and predicates. Then students make sure their sentences have capital letters and correct punctuation. 

  • Students have some opportunities to engage in tasks related to shared research projects that align to W.K.7. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lessons 44–45, students and the teacher engage in writing text-based opinion sentences about Martin Luther King Jr., and Bojangles. 

  • Shared Reading Lesson Plans provide opportunities throughout all four modules for students to answer questions that align to SL.K.4, but ELA materials do not include questions and tasks aligned to the standard. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 2, Lesson 34, after listening to Are you my Mother? by P.D. Eastman students respond to questions such as, “How would you ever feel if you didn’t know where your mother was? Have you ever fallen? Have you ever been scared by  loud noises?” Students share answers orally. 

  • Shared Reading and ELA materials lack evidence of questions and tasks aligned to SL.K.5, RL.K.6, and RI.K.6. 

Over the course of each unit, some assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Shared Reading Lesson Plans include assessment opportunities aligned to RL.K.3 at the end of every five days of instruction. For example, in the Shared Reading Lesson Plans, Module 3, Lesson 10, after listening to Good Night, Wind by Linda Elovitz Marshall, students draw a picture of one way that the wind acts like a person in the story and then write about it. The teacher assesses students’ work using the written response rubric, which measures accuracy and text evidence. 

  • Materials provide assessment opportunities aligned to W.K.1. For example, in the ELA Lesson Plans, Module 4, Lessons 26–30, students complete the Book of the Year writing task, where they write about the best book that they read throughout the year, demonstrating their own ability to share opinions in writing. 

  • Materials provide a rubric aligned to W.K.2 for teacher use to assess students’ informative writing.  

  • For each writing task in ELA, the teacher uses the editing and revision rubric to evaluate student writing; however, the rubric measures capitalization and spelling only and the teacher uses the rubric prior to providing students with explicit instruction on editing and revising. 

  • Materials do not provide formal assessment opportunities aligned to W.K.7, though the shared research projects are assessed based on students’ content knowledge, literacy knowledge, and integration of knowledge and ideas. The teacher uses a rubric which measures these three areas. For example, the ELA  Module 3 culminating task, which is also a shared research project, assesses whether students have a topic sentence and directly relates to information learned in books about the life cycle of plants. 

  • The K–1 Teacher Manual includes Listening and Speaking rubrics for Kindergarten for assessing SL.1 through SL.6. 

  • Shared Reading and ELA materials lack evidence of assessment opportunities aligned to RI.K.3, RL.K.6, and RI.K.6.

By the end of the academic year, some standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans address RL.K.3 within and across all four units. 

  • Shared Reading Lesson Plans  lack evidence of opportunities to address RI.K.3; however, ELA materials address the standards within and across all four Modules. 

  • Materials provide explicit instruction, questions and tasks, and assessment opportunities aligned to W.K.1 and W.K.2. in all four modules of ELA.  

  • Materials do not provide explicit instruction aligned to W.K.5 until Module 4 of ELA, which does not give students the opportunity to ensure mastery of the standard by the end of the year. 

  • ELA Lesson Plans address W.K.7 twice, once in Module 2 and once in Module 3. 

  • Throughout the entire program, the fourth day of Shared Reading materials addresses SL.K.4 through questions; however, materials lack evidence of explicit instruction or assessment of the standard to ensure mastery. In addition, ELA materials lack evidence of opportunities to address SL.K.4. 

  • Shared Reading and ELA Lesson Plans  lack evidence of opportunities to address SL.K.5, RL.K.6, and RI.K.6. 

Indicator 2H
02/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.

The Program Guide includes a suggested implementation schedule, which includes 2 hours and 15 minutes of instruction daily. In order to complete the lessons, one must spend 45 minutes per instructional block, Shared Reading, ELA, and Differentiated Instruction, each day. Materials include 180 lessons in ELA and 180 lessons in Shared Reading. While this could conceivably be completed in a school year, there is no time allotted for interruptions to the school year or reteaching. Core learning takes place during the Shared Reading and ELA blocks, for a total of 90 minutes a day, but some tasks from those blocks must be finished during the Differentiated Instruction block. The materials also provide flexible schedule documentation, though it is unclear whether students would master all standards if lessons were omitted. 

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The program allots 45 minutes for Shared Reading, 45 minutes for ELA, and 45 minutes for Differentiated Instruction. The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual states that the blocks have to be 45 minutes each in order to get the entire lesson in.

  • Materials provide a sample schedule for a 9–3 school day. The schedule includes time for Shared Reading, ELA, and Differentiated Instruction as well as math, a daily special, and either social studies or science.

  • In the Bookworms K-1 Teacher Manual, Planning for Success, the materials provide various flexible schedules for schools with fewer days or planned interruptions. These schedules can reduce the curriculum by either 10 or 20 days, though the impact on students’ mastery of the standards is not addressed.

Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Shared Reading and ELA instructional blocks include 180 days of lessons. This cannot be reasonably completed in a school year, as the implementation schedule does not factor in interruptions to instruction, such as early release days, special events, field trips, testing, and celebrations, or time for reteaching and reassessing learning.  

  • The Bookworms K–1 Teacher Manual states, “Each of the 3 blocks of time that we planned for in Bookworms must be 45 minutes long. It will not be possible for teachers to shorten any of them. Leaders who schedule the day without keeping those minutes protected are likely to frustrate teachers working on something very new and scuttle the potential effects of the design on student achievement.”

  • The Shared Reading Lesson Plans include seven components and the ELA Lesson Plans include nine components; however, materials do not provide a recommended time frame for each part of the lesson to help the teacher stay within the 45 minute lesson structure.

Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence of optional materials found. 

Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence of optional materials found. 

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

Indicator 3A
00/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

Indicator 3B
00/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

Indicator 3C
00/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

Indicator 3E
00/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

Indicator 3F
00/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

Indicator 3I
00/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

Indicator 3J
00/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

Indicator 3K
00/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

Indicator 3M
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3N
00/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

Indicator 3Q
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.