Benchmark Advance, Grade 6
2022

Benchmark Advance, Grade 6

Publisher
Benchmark Education Company
Subject
ELA
Grades
6
Report Release
01/17/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
Not Eligible
Key areas of interest

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
NC = Not Claimed. The publisher does not claim that this component is addressed in the materials.
NC
Building Knowledge
20/24
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

About This Report

Report for 6th Grade

Alignment Summary

The Benchmark Grade 6 materials partially meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include some instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.

6th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Partially Meets Expectations
Usability (Gateway 3)
Not Rated
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading, and the majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text.

Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners.Materials provide opportunities for on-demand writing and longer process writing tasks throughout the school year, and evidence-based writing instruction occurs during writing lessons and includes intentional modeling, practice, and analysis. Materials provide explicit instruction for all grade-level grammar and usage standards.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

12/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. Units contain a variety of text types and genres including drama, myths, legend, screenplay, fantasy, biographies, memoirs, science fiction, opinion, various poetry, and informational texts based on social studies and life science concepts. Publishers indicate that there is a 54/46 balance of literary and informational texts; however, this number includes all small group and Reader’s Theater texts which not every student read. Instead, the core texts for the materials reflect a 66/34 balance. Anchor texts range from 920L–1220L, with the majority of texts falling within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading. The anchor texts provide some range of text types, with the majority of texts being informational science or social studies texts. More varied text types are included in the small group instruction Building Knowledge Text Sets.

Indicator 1A
02/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1a. 

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. High-quality texts include engaging pictures, colorful illustrations, character relationships and motives, and rich vocabulary. Each unit begins with two short read paired texts and two extended reads. Some anchor texts are rich in figurative language, domain-specific vocabulary, and directly support student growth in vocabulary for the unit topic. Some anchor texts are short excerpts of larger published works and range from short reads to extended reads; however, some excerpts lack the depth for students to grow their understanding of story elements and are not of significant length to provide an engaging text for readers. Each unit concludes with a read aloud poem as the final anchor text. The poetry selections are used for one mini-lesson with the majority of poems published and written by a diverse representation of well-known poets, classic and modern. The selected poems generally do not directly support the essential question and may require additional inferences from students.

Some anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 1, students read the autobiographical excerpt “This Fascinating World of Nature” from Unbowed by Wangari Maathai. The text is an autobiography by a Nobel Peace Prize winner about her life in Kenya. The text is engaging for readers and includes an image of the author and photographs of wildlife. 

  • In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 1–5, students read the realistic fiction excerpt "Cassie's Fight" from Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, by Mildred D. Taylor. Abundant in cultural relevance, this excerpt from a Newbery Award winning novel contains a topic with which students can identify and has thematically rich issues with a strong, complex character.

  • In Unit 3, Weeks 2–3, students read two informational texts, “Queen Elizabeth I of England” by Alan Wood and “Queen Elizabeth II of England” by Benjamin Godfrey. Both texts are rich in knowledge and domain-specific vocabulary as they explore the rule of the two queens and the government structure of the British parliament.  

  • In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, students read the informational narrative poem "In Response to Executive Order 9066/Executive Order 9066" by Dwight Okia. This text is of high quality and its Japanese American author adds to its cultural relevance. The text includes historical photos that support meaning.

  • In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 5, students read the narrative poem "Ain't I A Woman?" by Sojourner Truth. This text is of high quality and is culturally relevant with a well known author. It contains thought provoking and thematically rich issues.

  • In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 1, students read the informational text “Studying Earth’s Core” by Tom Johnson. This text includes supportive text features, such as diagrams, photographs, and headings to help build understanding of the subject.

  • In Unit 10, Week 2, Days 1–4, students read the informational science text "Flip, Spin, and Soar!" by Michael Sandler. This text includes text features that extend meaning, and contains academic vocabulary.

Some of the anchor texts are not high-quality, well-crafted, content rich and engaging for students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, students read “The Broken Sphere,” an excerpt from the legend Shadows of Sherwood by Kekla Magoon. The excerpt is too short to give it depth and engage readers.

  • In Unit 7, Week 3, Day 5, students listen to the read-aloud poem “Dream Catchers,” which is labeled as an Ojibwe poem. While the poem may introduce a culturally relevant topic, it does not indicate that it is from a published or verified source.

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 4, students read the informational science text "Glaciers on the Move" by Kathy Furgang. This text contains a brief overview of information and does not go in depth into the topic.

  • In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 1, students read the informational textMission to Mars” by Ann Hodgman. Although the text addresses a high interest topic, it lacks content and rich vocabulary. It contains text features, including a diagram and a table, but these features do not help support or extend learning from the text. 

Indicator 1B
02/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Each of the 10 units contain a variety of text types and genres including drama, myths, legend, screenplay, fantasy, biographies, memoirs, science fiction, opinion, various poetry, and informational texts based on social studies and life science concepts. Publishers indicate that there is a 54/46 balance of literary and informational texts; however, this number includes all small group and Reader’s Theater texts which not every student read.  Instead, the core texts for the materials reflect a 66/34 balance.  This does not include the read aloud poem at the end of each unit because the lesson and tasks associated are not directly connected to the unit purpose or skills. Only 4 units include literary core texts for instruction. The majority of units focus completely on either literary or informational texts.  Units 4, 6, and 8 provide mixed text types for students to cross-analyze. 

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 4, the extended read is a memoir "The Writings of John Muir" an excerpt from The Story of My Boyhood and Youth by John Muir.

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, during whole group instruction, students read the drama excerpt "In Hiding" from the The Diary of Anne Frank, by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett.

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, the read-aloud poem is “Revolutionary Dreams” by Nikki Giovanni. 

  • In Unit 4, during small group instruction, students read the personal narrative When I Was Your Age by Doris Kells Goodenow, Elvira Medina, Domenico Tino, Eleanor Foster, and Virginia Azua Alanis.

  • In Unit 5, one of the Reader’s Theater selections is an adaptation from the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. 

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, during whole group instruction, students read the informational narrative poem “The Legend of El Dorado/Eldorado” by Edgar Allan Poe.

  • In Unit 7, the Knowledge Building Topic Set includes one biography Julius Caesar/ Cleopatra by Sarah Albee and The da Vinci Notebooks by Leonardo da Vinci. 

  • In Unit 8, during small group instruction, students read the informational book Trackers of Dynamic Earth by Anna-Maria Crum.

  • In Unit 9, Week 3, the extended read text is research nonfiction. “Going Out” is an excerpt from Factory Girl by Leslie T. Chang. 

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Day 5, during whole group instruction, students read the free verse poem “The Windmill” by Amy Ludwig VanDerwater.

Materials do not reflect a 55/45 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Overall the materials include 29 informational core texts and 15 literary core texts for a 66/34 balance.

  • Unit 1 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 2 contains 4 core texts with 100% being literary.

  • Unit 3 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 4  contains 4 core texts with 66% being literary and 34% being informational.

  • Unit 5 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 6 contains 6 core texts with 83% being literary and 17% being informational.

  • Unit 7 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 8 contains 4 core texts with 50% being literary and 50% being informational.

  • Unit 9 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 10 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

Indicator 1C
04/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c. 

Anchor texts range from 920L–1220L, with the majority of texts falling within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. The qualitative complexity of texts spans dimensions such as complex sets of events and characters that require an understanding of the time period, complicated plots, time shifts, and unfamiliar vocabulary including academic and domain-specific words. The Program Support Guide provides a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement.

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 4, students read “Jason’s Challenge” (1140L), an excerpt from The Golden Fleece and the Heroes who Lived Before Achilles by Padraic Colum. The quantitative complexity falls at the high end of the Grades 6–8 Lexile Stretch Band. The text has a high qualitative complexity due to its difficult sentence structure, archaic language, and references to people and places that may be unfamiliar to the reader. While reading, students make connections about characters and describe a character’s response to events. 

  • In Unit 5, Week 3, Days 1–4, students read the informational text “Updating Archeology” (1220L) by Ken Floyd. The quantitative complexity is the highest in the unit, landing above the Grades 6–8  Lexile Stretch Band. Qualitatively, the text has a simple and straightforward purpose, utilizes a chronological text structure, and contains domain-specific vocabulary and complex sentences. Students trace and evaluate the author’s claim, as well as how graphics support the text’s meaning, through partner discussions. Students write their responses to questions about the best details to support an author’s claim and compare graphics from the unit texts.  

  • In Unit 6, Week 3, Days 1–4, students read a fantasy text, “Midwinter Day” (940L), an excerpt from Susan Cooper’s The Dark is Rising. Quantitatively, this text falls at the lower end of the Grades 6–8 Lexile Stretch Band; however, the text has a high qualitative complexity rating. The text is about time travel and students must make inferences to determine meaning. The text contains figurative and old-fashioned language, as well as formal British dialect and references. Students analyze how the character’s actions impacted the plot. During the close reading lesson, students discuss and write about how the unit texts demonstrate that different cultures and time periods treated the idea of a quest differently. Then, students write a short essay on which genre best communicates the quest. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, students read “The South Pole” (930L), a short read, science fiction excerpt from “Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea” by Jules Verne. The text falls just within the Grades 6–8 Lexile Stretch Band. Qualitatively, this short read is moderately complex due to its novel form and chronological order. The text contains some complex and very precise descriptions and many compound and complex sentences with subordinate clauses and transitional phrases. After analyzing the characters in the excerpt, students listen to an audio version of the story and discuss the differences in both ways of experiencing the story. Students then write a response to a prompt about the mental images created by certain phrases in the story. 

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a separate text complexity document for both anchor texts and small group texts. The text complexity documents are accessible as PDFs for each grade in the digital Program Support Guide under the tab for Text Complexity Analyses and Rationales for Purpose and Placement. 

  • The Teacher Resource System for each unit also includes introductory materials including a Guide to Text Complexity section that provides an accurate summary of the quantitative and qualitative data for each anchor text in the unit. This guide contains an overall qualitative text complexity measure based on a color-coded system with levels of low complexity, moderate complexity, substantial complexity, and highest complexity. The guide shares a brief statement on the four qualitative measures of each text: Purpose and Levels of Meaning, Structure, Language Conventionality and Clarity, and Knowledge Demands.

  • The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.

Indicator 1D
02/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d. 

The Lexile levels of the anchor texts range from 920–1220. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. The texts with the highest quantitative measures are all informational texts containing domain-specific vocabulary with the purpose of knowledge building. While modeling of skills is present in most lessons, the time for modeling and practice is very brief and the skills change from day to day without providing sufficient practice and reinforcement. While the extended read texts in Weeks 2 and 3 of each unit allow for multiple reads, throughout each unit the routines, time frames, and expectations for reading and analyzing texts are similar and do not necessarily change based on the complexity of the text, making it difficult to determine how the materials will build independence in the reader throughout the year.

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides some opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, the anchor texts range from 950L–1180L. Throughout the unit, students practice comprehension strategies, including analyzing how a key idea is developed in a text. For example, students read the informational science text “Marjory Stoneman Douglas: Friend to the Everglades” by Amanda Polidre (950L). The overall complexity of the text is rated as substantially complex with qualitative complexity spanning text structure, language, and knowledge demand. In Week 1, Lesson 4, the teacher models how to determine the key idea and how it is developed. After the model, students work in pairs to annotate the text and answer the questions, “What other details support the central idea of the text? What major event or detail do you think should be included in the text?” At the end of the lesson, students self-select a leveled text and practice determining the key idea and its development. During independent time, students answer the Apply Understanding question, “How did Marjorie Stoneman Douglass advocate for the Everglades?”

  • In Unit 5, the anchor texts range from 1120L–1220L. During the unit, students build on prior learning to practice comprehension strategies, including analyzing how a key idea is developed in a text. For example, students read the informational text “Robot Cops” by Judi Black (1120L). The text is rated as moderately complex across all qualitative measures of levels of meaning, text structure,  language, and knowledge demand. In Week 1, Lesson 7, the teacher begins the lesson by stating, “Authors can also use graphic features to develop a topic. When authors use photos and captions or other graphic features to elaborate, they provide visual and text details that support the written text. Today, we’re going to analyze how the author of ‘Robot Cops’ uses photos and captions to develop key ideas in the text.”  Then, students work in pairs to annotate the text and respond to the following prompt: “Underline the key ideas in the text that the photographs and captions on pages 4 and 5 elaborate. Then draw lines from the key ideas to the corresponding photographs or captions. Discuss how the author uses the photograph and caption to elaborate the key idea. Jot your ideas in the margin.” At the end of the lesson, students reflect on the lesson and discuss their responses to the question, “How do the photographs, captions, and text show positive and negative effects of robot cops on people?”

  • In Unit 10, the anchor texts range from 990L–1150L. Throughout the unit, students utilize prior learning to determine central ideas and key details that support its development. In Week 2, Lesson 4, students read the informational text “The Silk Road, Yesterday and Today” by Alexandra Hanson-Harding (1020L). The text is rated substantially complex with qualitative complexity in layers of meaning and language. Students work in pairs to annotate the text and complete the following task: “Reread the introduction to ‘The Silk Road, Yesterday and Today.’ Identify key details to determine the central idea of the text. Continue reading the section ‘China and Rome’ on pages 13–14 to find details that support the central idea.” At the end of the lesson, students “reflect on how they determined the central idea” during the Share and Reflect section and the teacher “call[s] on one or two students to share their thought processes with the whole class.” During independent time, students continue identifying key details to determine the central idea for the remainder of the text. 

As texts become more complex, some appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week1, the teacher reads aloud “Marjory Stoneman Douglas: Friend of the Everglades” by Amanda Polidre and demonstrates how to determine the central idea by identifying key details in the text. During independent reading time, students use sticky notes to identify key details in their leveled reader. 

  • In Unit 5, Week 1, students independently read “Robot Cops” by Judi Black. As students read they annotate and make inferences in the margin. Teacher guidance includes, “Encourage students to use other strategies they know to support their understanding….” 

  • In Unit 8, Week 3, students read “Studying Earth’s Core” by Tom Johnson with a partner and annotate and discuss the text. Teacher guidance includes, “Provide additional support or extend the experience using Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy.” The scaffolding suggestions, which are located in the margin of the lesson, are not text-specific and are the same for every unit.

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading. The anchor texts provide some range of text types, with the majority of texts being informational science or social studies texts. More varied text types are included in the small group instruction Building Knowledge Text Sets. Each unit also includes a novel study that is recommended but not required for independent reading. 

Materials provide support for the teacher to foster independent reading; however, the prompts frequently focus on comprehension strategies. Materials provide independent reading procedures but many are not built into the program framework. The program includes “independent reading mini lessons;” however, there is no schedule or guidance available for teachers to know when to teach these mini lessons. Accountability systems for independent reading include a reading log and corresponding family letter. Materials provide a recommended amount of time students should spend reading, along with a schedule to provide students adequate opportunities to engage in independent reading; however, there is no information on the volume of reading students should do during this time. The Pacing Guide in the Teachers Resource Guide for each unit delineates implementation formats for 90-minute, 120-minute, and 150-minute blocks. For the implementation of the program within a 90-minute reading block, the Read Aloud is removed and the time for small group and independent reading time is combined to 15 minutes or less which would significantly reduce the volume of reading for students, as time allotted for the Building Knowledge Text Sets is reduced.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Across Units 1-10, the anchor texts include science fiction, informational life science and social studies texts, biographies, memoirs, research nonfiction, fantasy, drama, screenplay, opinion texts, journals, speeches, personal narratives, myths, legends, science fiction, fables, and and narrative poetry. 

  • The Building Knowledge Text Sets (in which not every student will access all texts) include fantasy, realistic fiction, journals, social studies texts, biographies, plays, fables, mystery, procedural texts, opinion, drama, historical fiction, life science, legends, narrative nonfiction, graphic stories, folktales and personal narrative texts. 

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Days 1-3 students read the drama “In Hiding” from The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 4 students read the myth “Jason’s Challenge” from The Golden Fleece and the Heroes Who Lived Before Achilles by Padraic Colum. In Unit 2, Week 2, Days 1-5 students read the realistic fiction text “Cassie’s Fight” from Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry by Mildred D. Taylor. In Unit 2, Week 3, Days 1-3 students read the legend “Feyrouz the Brave” from Arabian Nights by Wafa Tarnowska. In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 5 students read the poem The Road Not Taken by Robert Frost.

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, Days 1-3 students read the poem The Legend of El Dorado/Eldorado by Edgar Allan Poe. In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4 students read the legend “The Broken Sphere” an excerpt from Shadows of Sherwood by Kekla Magoon. In Unit 6, Week 2, Days 1-4 students read the legend/narrative poem/screenplay The Legend of Mulan / Mulan Joins the Army by Ouyang Yuqian. In Unit 6, Week 3, Days 1-3 students read the fantasy “Midwinter Day” from The Dark is Rising by Susan Cooper. In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 5 students read the poem Ain’t I A Woman by Sojourner Truth.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and support for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students read 50 anchor texts over the course of the year. 20 of these texts are short reads, 20 are extended reads, and 10 are poems. Additionally they read 30 vocabulary practice texts and 10 reader theater texts. Students listen to a read aloud for 10-15 minutes daily.

  • Within a school day students listen to a read-aloud for 10-15 minutes, engage with an anchor text, and participate in small group and/or independent reading. 30-40 minutes of independent reading time is suggested per day.

  • The Weekly Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes a section titled Independent Reading & Conferring. While materials offer independent reading selections, the teacher is also prompted within the lesson for students to use this time to complete the whole group reading and task. Each day has a focus task for independent reading including “Set Personal Learning Goals,” “Read Independently,” Begin the Blueprint,” “Read the Vocabulary Practice Text,” or “Create a Decision Making Guide.” The planner provides these teacher recommendations for independent reading:

    •  Ensure that all students read independently to build volume and stamina.

    • Confer with a few students on their text selections, application of strategies, and knowledge building tasks.

    • See additional independent suggestions (including the Research and Inquiry Project) on the Unit Foldout. 

  • In Unit 10, during a three week time period, students read two short reads; an informational science text Mission to Mars by Ann Hodgeman and an opinion Humans to Mars: Yes or No? By Ann Hodgeman. Students read two extended texts; an informational science text Flip, Spin, and Soar! By Michael Sandler and an opinion Track Cycling for Young People: Pros and Cons by Asha Sandler, Andrea Hawkins, Jonathan Montre and a free verse poem The Windmill by Amy Ludwig VanDerwater. Students participate in daily independent and/or small group reading.

There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The teacher edition includes daily Reading and Responding lessons to be used with the anchor texts.

  • Materials provide a list of trade books for read alouds that could also be used as recommendations for students during independent reading time.

  • Materials include a weekly reading log for both at home and at school, as well as a family letter that coincides with the home reading log.

  • Materials offer additional resources to support the teacher with fostering students’ independent reading; however, some of these resources are not a part of the core program or are not incorporated into the daily framework. These materials include:

    • Independent reading mini lessons are provided but information as to when to do them is not included.

    • The Teacher Edition provides Review and Routines which includes independent reading routines. The routines provide information as to what to do during independent reading. They do not provide information for setting up procedures or expectations. Materials also do not provide information on the volume of reading students should be doing during this time.

    • The Additional Resources section includes a Managing Your Independent Reading Guide. This  resource includes teacher guidance on conferring periodically or as often as possible with students. The “Conferring with Students'' section explains what a reading conference is, why teachers should have them and a general idea of how to run one. This section does not give teachers guidance on how to grow independent readers during a conference.

    • Each unit provides a student ebook for recommended independent reading; however, materials do not provide text-specific guidance, student tasks, or accountability measures for the ebook.

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

17/18

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text. Activities such as Build, Reflect, Write; Extended Thinking Questions; Apply Understanding; Share and Reflect; Constructive Conversations, and Guided Practice accompany the anchor texts for Short Reads and Extended Reads. Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners. The discussion protocols fall primarily under the following two protocols: Turn and Talk and Constructive Conversations. In some units, students engage in whole group presentations. Materials provide opportunities for on-demand writing and longer process writing tasks throughout the school year. Students engage in a variety of genres of writing tasks including, but not limited to, informative/explanatory, argument, narrative and summaries. Materials include an entire unit on text-based prompts and a unit on process writing for each of the writing types. The Program Support Guide includes a K-6 Year-Long Writing Scope and Sequence indicating which writing types and standards are the focus of each unit. The majority of units feature text-based prompts or process writing prompts that explicitly require students to gather and use evidence from either anchor texts or outside sources such as websites. Evidence-based writing instruction occurs during writing lessons and includes intentional modeling, practice, and analysis. While all three writing types are present across the year, the distribution of writing types required by the standards is not present. Materials provide explicit instruction for all grade-level grammar and usage standards. Instruction on grammar and usage occurs in context within anchor reading texts and in grammar lessons provided in the writing block. The Program Support Guide provides a one-page Year-Long Vocabulary Development Plan which provides the focus word list for each week. 

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f. 

The majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text. Activities such as Build, Reflect, Write; Extended Thinking Questions; Apply Understanding; Share and Reflect; Constructive Conversations, and Guided Practice accompany the anchor texts for Short Reads and Extended Reads. When completing many of these tasks, students must use textual evidence to support answers to questions and discussions, both independently and collaboratively. Each unit also includes text-specific questions during which students synthesize or compare and contrast information across texts. 

The Teacher’s Resource System for each unit provides implementation and follow up support for text-dependent questioning and discussion. The Teacher’s Resource System also includes text-dependent questions and tasks for the teacher to use during mini-lessons and small group instruction. The student ebook for each unit’s anchor texts also includes text-dependent questions in the Apply Understanding and Build Knowledge sections after each text. Writing prompts that build toward the unit culminating task are also typically text-dependent. Materials include possible responses for many questions or discussion prompts posed during the mini-lessons. The Small Group texts also include text-dependent questions; however, due to the choice in literacy block length and needs of students, some students may not have the opportunity to respond to all of the text-dependent questions during small group time.

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 13, the teacher uses  The Haudenosaunee Confederacy by Monica Halpern to model how to use text details to determine the author’s purpose. During Guided Practice, students complete the following task, “Read paragraphs 4–6. What do you think is the author’s purpose for focusing on Dekanawida? What details support your thinking?” Materials include possible responses for teacher use.

  • In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 8, after reading The Legend of Mulan by Ouyang Yuqian, students work with a partner to read, annotate, and discuss the following prompt during Constructive Conversations: “How is Mulan’s response to the narrator in stanza 2 of ‘The Ballad of Mulan’ different from her response to the prince in stanza 9? What can we infer about how her character has changed based on these responses?” Materials provide possible responses for teacher use.

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Lesson 4, students independently write in response to the following Apply Understanding question: “Evaluate the three opinion articles in the selection “Track Cycling for Young People: Pros and Cons.” Which of the authors in this section does the best job of supporting his or her claims with reasons and evidence? Use details from the selection to support your thinking.” Materials include sample answers and evidence as a model for student use.

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 4, the teacher conducts a read aloud of “In Hiding” an excerpt from The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Then, the teacher models going back into the text to annotate details: “I can see several details in this introduction that can help me understand the central idea of this section. For example, the text says that Anne hid because, “Jewish people were the target of discrimination and, eventually, persecution.” I will underline this detail.” 

  • In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 12, materials include the following guidance to support the teacher with engaging student thinking and setting the purpose for the lesson: “Lyric poems are often written with strong emotions and typically have a musical quality. Today, we will explore the structure and rhythm of one of Emily Dickinson’s best-known poems, ‘I’m Nobody! Who are you?’ by comparing our silent reading to an audio recording of the poem.” The teacher reads the first stanza aloud and models how the punctuation in the poem guides the reading of the poem. Then the teacher plays the audio version of the first stanza. Materials include guidance to support the teacher with pointing out differences in the two types of texts: “I noticed that when I read the poem, the pause I took when I encountered a dash was different in length than the narrator’s in the recording. I also noticed that my inflections when I read the lines with the exclamation points and question marks were slightly different as well.”

  • In Unit 7, Week 3, Lesson 7, during Constructive Conversations, students work in partner groups to reread and annotate “The Golden Age of the Inca Empireby Vincent Banks and to discuss the following prompt: “How well does the author support his claim that the Inca were ‘one of the greatest civilizations in the Americas?’ Cite specific evidence from the text to support your thinking.” Materials include possible responses to support the teacher such as, “The author provides strong text evidence to support his claim that the Inca were ‘one of the greatest civilizations in the Americas.’ He gives data on the size of the empire and the number of structures and terraces at Machu Picchu, and he backs up the statistics with a map and photographs.”

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners. The discussion protocols fall primarily under the following two protocols: Turn and Talk and Constructive Conversations. These discussion opportunities are frequent in the materials and vary in purpose. Guidance for teachers and students includes a question for the teacher to pose, possible student responses, and generic protocol directions through the use of the “Guidance for Effective Classroom, Small Group, and Partner Discussion in the Review and Routines Guide.” Most notably, the materials provide a breakdown of each protocol in the “Speaking and Listening Protocols” document found in the Additional Materials section. 

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Multiple opportunities to Turn and Talk throughout each unit and the year. These Turn and Talks vary on their structure and their purpose. 

  • Each unit contains Discuss the Blueprint lessons. These lessons include a Constructive Conversations component. The directions remain the same throughout the units and the school year. 

  • Under Additional Resources for each unit, materials provide a Real-World Perspectives Supporting Constructive Conversations reproducible for use with the corresponding lesson of the unit. This reproducible tells students the different parts of a Constructive Conversation and includes sentence stems for student use during each part. According to the reproducible, the five parts of a Constructive Conversation include state ideas; clarify ideas; support and build up ideas; introduce, clarify, and support a second idea; and evaluate and compare ideas. The reproducible includes 5 Respectful Conversation Tips and a Build Knowledge Word Bank. The reproducible starts with the first 3 parts of the conversation and adds the fourth and fifth step as the year progresses. The Build Knowledge Word Bank changes from unit to unit.

  • In the Launch materials, the Day 2 mini lesson,students learn about being an active listener. “Conduct a brief discussion about what people do to be active listeners. List suggestions given by students on the anchor chart. Some important things to include could be as follows: - Have eyes on the speaker, - Maintain a quiet body, - Use appropriate expression to show interest, - Be patient while the speaker chooses what to say. Give enough wait time - Think carefully about what the speaker is saying.” 

  • In the Research and Inquiry guide for teachers, the margin on page 10 provides Options for Presenting for student use. The options are the same for each research project and the following is provided:

    • “There are many ways that students can share with one another. Choose one that works well in your classroom setting.

    • Whole group: Students can present to the entire class.

    • Small group: Break students into groups of 3–4 to present to one another.

    • Partnerships: Pair students up to share their projects.

    • Video: Students can film their presentation and share them on a digital platform.

    • Visits: Students can visit other classrooms to share what they have created and learned, or guests can join you in the classroom in person or virtually.

    • Out in the World: If the inquiry project is one that would be useful for others, students can mail or email the project.”

  • In Unit 2, Week 2 Lesson 14, students engage in a Constructive Conversation with a partner to prepare for the culminating task. The teacher states, ”Now you will talk with a partner about what you learned. Then you’ll do the second step in creating a character analysis chart, this unit’s culminating task.” Using the Knowledge Blueprint, students turn to a partner and discuss the questions. 

  • In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 9, students engage in a Share and Reflect with a partner to “...reflect on how examining the way different texts approach quests helps them explore this theme.” Use the Speaking and Writing Response Frames for modeling support. Students are told to use the Speaking and Writing response frames. Teachers are told to provide additional support or extend the experience, use Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy. The teacher calls on a few students to share their reflections. 

  • In Unit 10, Week 1, Lesson 6, students practice reading a limerick with a partner “using delivery and expression that is appropriate to the poem’s content.” Then partners discuss “what makes the limerick funny.” The teacher calls on a few students to share out. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Resource material, under the Additional Materials section for each unit, materials include a document that provides general teacher guidance on “Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations.” This guidance is the same throughout all units across the year.

    • For example, the resource states, “Teachers and students can better understand how to improve conversations with the tools that accompany the Benchmark Advance program. The first tool, the ‘Conversation Blueprint,’ is a visual guide to help teachers scaffold students’ conversations. This tool shows the structure of the two main types of conversations that should happen during lessons. The tools especially designed for students are the Think-Speak-Listen Flip Book…” These tools offer sentence systems for various skills within a conversation.”

  • The Discuss the Blueprint Constructive Conversations lessons include an Observational Checklist for Constructive Conversations for teacher use. Guidance in the Observational Checklist includes, “As peers engage in conversation, use the questions below to evaluate how effectively they communicate with each other. Based on your answers, you may wish to plan future lessons to support the constructive conversation process.” Questions include, “stay on topic throughout the discussion?, listen respectfully?, build on the comments of others?”

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 12 in Connect Skills to Knowledge: Turn and Talk, teacher guidance includes, “Pose questions that require students to use their knowledge of cause and effect to focus on Enduring Understanding 2 from the Knowledge Blueprint (Human development of resources has a lasting impact on the natural world). Ask partners to share ideas using words from the Build Knowledge Word Bank. Use the Build Up an Idea protocol found in the Additional Materials Bank. Invite a few students to share their ideas.” 

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 15 students read the poem, “The Legend of El Dorado” by Edgar Allen Poe. During the Constructive Conversation: Partner section of the mini-lesson, students discuss their annotations of the poem on descriptions of a character's actions. The margin of the Teacher’s Resource System provides an Observation Checklist for Constructive Conversation: “As peers engage in close reading, use the questions below to evaluate how effectively they communicate with each other. Based on your answers, you may wish to plan future lessons to support the constructive conversation process. Do peers…

    • stay on topic throughout the discussion? 

    • listen respectfully? 

    • build on the comments of others appropriately? 

    • pose or respond to questions to clarify information? 

    • support their peers?” 

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Lesson 10, students complete the Discuss the Blueprint mini-lesson. During the Constructive Conversation: Partner section, teacher guidance includes: “Ask students to turn to page 26 in ‘Forces: Going to Extremes’ and focus on Discuss Your Knowledge Blueprint in the Build Knowledge section. Explain that they will now turn to a partner to answer and discuss the questions listed in the section.” Then, in the Look-Fors text box below, materials include the following monitoring suggestions for teacher use: 

  • “Partners are actively engaged in discussion, with both partners contributing ideas.

  • Partners are referring to their blueprints and going back into their Texts for Close Reading and referencing their annotations.

  • Words from the Build Knowledge Word Bank are being used, as well as words related to biochemistry and Marie M. Daley’s work.”

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

Throughout the year, students typically have the opportunity to engage in speaking and listening daily, including opportunities to speak in whole group, partner, and small group settings. In some units, students engage in whole group presentations. These opportunities include speaker and audience expectations in the form of teacher directions and anchor charts. The materials provide partner sharing and small group discussion opportunities during the majority of speaking and listening tasks. Students complete a Knowledge Blueprint graphic organizer during the unit and hold a class discussion on what they learned at the end of the unit; the Knowledge Blueprint is expanded upon throughout the unit. Materials include opportunities to implement agreed upon rules for discussions, partner and small group work, and to guide students on answering questions about a speaker. While the materials do provide opportunities for students to address all of the Speaking and Listening standards, some of the activities are optional or at the discretion of the teacher. 

Students have many opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Week 1 students work with a partner and reread “Marjory Stoneman Douglas: Friend of the Everglades” by Amanda Polidore. Students respond to the following questions: “What other details support the central idea of the text? What major event or detail do you think should be included in the text?” Afterwards, students continue their partner discussions, focusing on “the details that helped them determine the central idea of the paragraphs. Were they different? Were they the same?” The teacher calls on “one or two students to share their thoughts with the class.” 

  • Follow rules for collegial discussions, set specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 5, Overview, How to Group Students: Flexible Grouping to Promote Learning, the materials provide to teachers about how these projects can organized, including individualism collaborative, and as a jigsaw. In the jigsaw, each student in a group is responsible for a certain portion of the project.

    • In the Grade 5, Reader’s Theater Handbook, Unit 2, Lesson 3, students take on various roles in the text and determine as a group how to complete the task in the given time frame. 

  • Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics, images, music, sound) and visual displays in presentations to clarify information. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 2, Weeks 1–3,  students work on a Research and Inquiry report: “For this Research and Inquiry Project, you will research discrimination during an era or event, and then create a research presentation for it. A research presentation shares important facts about a topic, and often includes visuals and/or audio to help explain the information. You can choose to create a virtual slide show, video report, typed report with pictures-or an idea of your own!” Students present their project upon completion and the teacher may utilize the Options for Presenting resource.

Speaking and listening work sometimes requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources.

  • Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 6, Units 7-8, Step 5, students are presenting their research project about ancient civilizations. The materials direct teachers to say, “History investigators—it is time for you to work on Step 5 of your research project in your e-notebooks. This is a chance for you to show others all that you learned about your ancient civilization. Remember that after you present, you should ask audience members specific questions about your presentation.

Audience—Remember to respond to the questions the presenter asks with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic. You should also pose your own questions.”

  • Review the key ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 10, students will poll their classmates to learn about their perspectives about the texts in the unit. The materials direct the teacher to say, “t the end of this unit, you will have polled several classmates about their perspectives of the selections in this unit. Using your notes, you will write a summary of your classmates’ responses and include your own insights. Today, you will poll two classmates on their perspectives of this week’s text.

Look back at “The Meeting.” What is the topic of this text? What is Stef’s perspective? Ask two classmates what insights they gained from this text. You may ask open‑ended questions such as What are your feelings about the topic? Take notes on their responses.”

  • Interpret information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how it contributes to a topic, text, or issue under study. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Week 2, students participate in a Constructive Conversation with a partner. After reading “The Legend of Mulan” by Ouyang Yuqian, students listen to the audio of the text. Students “mark the text when they hear audio that shows mood or indicates feeling or emotion” and “work with a partner to discuss their annotations.” 

  • Delineate a speaker's argument and specific claims, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 10, Week 1, students engage in a Constructive Conversation. The teacher frames the activity, stating, “In a previous lesson, we examined two sides of an argument in ‘Humans to Mars: Yes or No.’ Today, you will synthesize information to form your own opinions and decide where you stand on traveling to Mars.” During the Constructive Conversation, students discuss which argument from the texts is most convincing. Afterwards, the teacher “[selects] one or two students to share their thoughts on the selection with the class.” 

  • Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 8, Weeks 1-3, students research an ancient civilization, determining how to present their research in an organized and logical manner, with guidance on effective presentation skills.

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials provide opportunities for on-demand writing and longer process writing tasks throughout the school year. Mini-lessons provide students with direct instruction, guided practice, and independent time for writing. Students engage in a variety of genres of writing tasks including, but not limited to, informative/explanatory, argument, narrative and summaries. At the end of each text or text set, students have opportunities to write in response to text and are required to cite text evidence in their response. With multi-day writing tasks, the teacher models various revision and editing strategies and students have time to revise and edit their writing. Materials provide guidance for digital opportunities with some writing tasks. Materials also include additional guided inquiry projects aligned with unit(s) topics that can be incorporated within the unit. 

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, students read  “Jason’s Challenge” by Padraic Colum.  Then, students write a text connection, a self connection, and a world connection response. 

  • In Unit 4, Week 1, students write a paragraph comparing the theme of being an American using the texts “In Response to Executive Order 9066” by Dwight Okita and “Executive Order 9066” by Dwight Okita.  Students must use text evidence in their response. 

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, after reading “Marco Polo, China Trader” by Andrea Matthews and “Kublai, The Great Khan” by Susan Virgilio, students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the following questions: “Why do you think Kublai Khan trusted Marco Polo with important missions? Kublai Khan expanded the Mogol Empire even farther than Genghis Khan did. What factors allowed him to accomplish this? What can you infer about Kublai Khan’s reign from the two texts? Was it a successful one? Use details from the texts to support your answer.”

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Weeks 1–3, students write an informative/explanatory essay about a topic related to why societies form different governments. The teacher uses the Draft Model Text to model how to combine or separate sentences. Then, students work with a partner to practice. Finally students go back to their essay draft and work on revisions including focusing on sentence length. The teacher reminds students to use their writing resources for support with their revisions including, but not limited to, the Essay Anchor Chart and the Essay Planning Guide. 

  • In Unit 5, Week 3, students write an argumentative essay about a technology-related issue. After students plan and begin their drafts, the teacher models “how to edit to identify and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and persons.” During Guided Practice, students work with a partner to continue identifying the pronouns and their antecedents in the model text. During independent writing, “students review their use of pronouns as they edit their argument essay drafts. Students should also refer to the Argument Essay Rubric to begin their final revisions to their drafts.”

  • In Unit 7, Week 3, students engage in a mini-lesson on word choice while writing a narrative essay. The teacher models how to add precise, descriptive, and sensory language to a Draft Modeling Text. Students work with a partner to add the three types of language to a Practice Text. Then students revise their narrative by adding descriptive, precise, and sensory language. 

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • All units include Build-Reflect-Write eNotebooks for student use when responding to the close reading text Apply Understanding questions and Culminating Activity Enduring Understanding questions, as well as when completing Build Vocabulary tasks, Build Grammar and Language tasks, and graphic organizers for their Research and Inquiry project.

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, students may create the final draft of their opinion essay on the computer. Materials also include a Keyboarding Practice Lesson that can be given to increase students’ keyboarding skills. 

  • In Unit 5, Week 1, students learn about credible print and digital sources. After the teacher models the process for evaluating sources, students work with a partner to evaluate sources using a provided website. Students use these three questions to determine if a source is credible:

    • “Who created and maintains the website content, and is the author or organization considered an expert on the topic?

    • When was the information created and last updated? 

    • Does the information on the site show a particular bias or point of view?”

  • In Unit 8, Week 2, students create a multimedia presentation. The teacher models how to choose images for multimedia presentations. During Guided Practice, students work with a partner to brainstorm types of images they might use in the Mentor Multimedia Presentation. During independent time, students continue to draft their presentations, select images that support their topic and important ideas, and keep track of the sources for the images.

Indicator 1J
01/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1j.  

Across the year, students engage in a variety of writing text types through many different types of writing activities. Materials include an entire unit on text-based prompts and a unit on process writing for each of the writing types. The Program Support Guide includes a K-6 Year-Long Writing Scope and Sequence indicating which writing types and standards are the focus of each unit. There is a balance between writing in response to texts as well as process writing on a topic aligned to the unit focus. The writing mini-lessons occur daily and each unit utilizes multiple anchor charts, checklists, and graphic organizers called planning guides to support and guide students through each writing process. The majority of units include mentor texts for students to analyze before writing their own pieces. While all three writing types are present across the year, the distribution of writing types required by the standards is not present.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing; however, materials do not reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for opinion writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 28% of the writing in Grade 6 is argumentative writing. Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing as the focus of Unit 2 and Unit 5. In Unit 6, Week 3, students also use argumentative writing for a text-based prompt.

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for informative/explanatory writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 36% of writing in Grade 6 is informative/explanatory writing. Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing as the focus of Units 1, 3, 8, and 9. Both the News Report in Unit 8 and the Multimedia Project in Unit 9 are informational. In Unit 6, Week 2, students also use informative writing for a text-based prompt.

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for narrative writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 36% of writing in Grade 6 is narrative writing. Students have opportunities to focus on Unit 4 and Unit 7. In Unit 6, students also use narrative writing for a text-based prompt. This percentage also includes the poetry writing students do in Unit 10.

  • Explicit instruction in argumentative writing:

    • In Unit 5 the teacher models writing an argumentative essay and students plan, draft, revise, edit, and publish an argument essay. In Week 1, after previously gathering evidence to support reasons, the teacher models how to plan and organize argument essays. 

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

    • In Unit 3, students write an informative/explanatory essay about a topic related to why societies form different governments. In Week 1, the teacher models taking notes and organizing an essay. In Week 2, the teacher models introducing your topic, developing your topic, clarifying relationships among ideas and concepts, and developing a concluding statement. In Week 3, the teacher models revising to maintain formal style and tone as well as precise language and varying sentence length. 

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing:

    • In Unit 4, students write journal entries. In Weeks 1 and 2, the teacher models using events and details from a source text, developing the character, and developing the character's voice. In Week 3, the teacher models using narrative techniques to develop a character, using transition words and using precise language.  

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students have opportunities to engage in argumentative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Week 2, the teacher models how to introduce a claim in argumentative writing.  Students work in pairs to orally rehearse how they can introduce their claims and build interest in their topic.  During independent work time, students draft a cohesive paragraph for their argument essay.  

    • Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Week 3, the teacher models how to support claims with clear reasons and text evidence in argumentative writing.  Students work with a partner to examine the source text for text evidence to support a claim and then add to the example.  During independent work time, students work on their drafts and focus on providing reasons for their claims and supporting those reasons with text evidence.  

    • Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Week 3, the teacher models how to clarify the relationship among claims by using correlative conjunctions.  Students work in pairs to revise sentences by adding correlative conjunctions to clarify relationships among ideas and to vary sentence structure.  During independent work time, students revise their drafts to clarify relationships among claims and reasons and to vary sentences by using correlative conjunctions.  

    • Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Week 3, the teacher models revising writing drafts for a formal tone.  Students work in pairs to review a sample text and determine how to revise for a more formal tone.  During independent work time, students revise their individual drafts for a more formal tone. 

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the argument presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Week 2, the teacher models elaborating on previously written concluding statements for argumentative essays.  Students work with a partner to review their drafts and determine how they can elaborate on their concluding statements.  During independent writing time, students revise their concluding statements.  

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce a topic; organize ideas, concepts, and information, using strategies such as definition, classification, comparison/contrast, and cause/effect; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 9, Week 2, students engage in a mini-lesson about how to write an introduction and a title for a news report. Teachers use a Draft Model Text to show an effective and an ineffective title and instruction. Students write a title and introduction for their news report during independent writing time. 

    • Develop the topic with relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3 students write an informative/explanatory essay about a topic related to why societies form different governments. In Week 1, the teacher displays and distributes the Informative/Explanatory Essay Writing Checklist and explains it to students. The teacher models how to use a three-column chart to brainstorm a topic. Students practice using a three-column chart to brainstorm their topics.

    • Use appropriate transitions to clarify the relationships among ideas and concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Week 2, the teacher models using transition words and phrases to show contrasting, similar, or cause-and-effect relationships between ideas.  Students work in pairs to practice using transitions and phrases by writing two or three sentences describing details related to their essay topic.  During independent work time, students revise their drafts to make clear connections between ideas and concepts.  

    • Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Week 3, the teacher models using precise and descriptive language and making the meaning of domain specific vocabulary accessible to the reader.  Students work in pairs to revise a sentence and replace general words with more descriptive and specific vocabulary.  During independent work time, students identify weak or vague vocabulary in their essays and replace it with more precise language or domain specific language.  

    • Establish and maintain a formal style. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Week 3, the teacher models revising an essay to maintain a formal style and tone.  Students work in pairs to review a practice text and discuss what changes could be made to present a more formal style and tone.  During independent work time, students make revisions to their individual writing pieces to maintain a more formal style and tone.  

    • Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the information or explanation presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Week 3, the teacher models ending an essay with a strong concluding statement or section.  The teacher tells students this is important because it is “your opportunity to remind readers of your topic’s important ideas and leave your readers with something to think about. Students work in pairs to brainstorm ways to develop a concluding statement for their own essays.  During independent work time, students draft a concluding statement for their writing piece.  

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 7, Week 2, the teacher models how to establish context and introduce characters in a historical fiction writing piece.  Students work in pairs to reread the model text and other information that reveals about the character and events.  During independent work time, the students begin to draft their historical fiction piece by establishing a situation and introducing characters in cohesive paragraphs.  

    • Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Week 1, the teacher models developing a character’s voice using a Character Trait Chart and Sample Character Voice Chart. The teacher shows how to use the trait of a character and examples of the character’s voice and way to convey that voice. Students work with a partner to practice.  During independent work time, students choose a trait and write a paragraph to convey the character’s voice. 

    • Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence and signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Week 3, the teacher models using transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence.  Students work in pairs to revise a text by adding temporal words, phrases, or clauses.  During independent work time, students revise their drafts by adding temporal transition words, phrases, and clauses.  

    • Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to convey experiences and events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Week 3, the teacher models using precise words and phrases and sensory language when writing a journal entry.  Students work in pairs to revise a practice text by adding precise words and phrases.  During independent work time, students revise their individual drafts to add precise words and phrases.  

    • Provide a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 7, Week 11, the teacher models writing a conclusion to a historical writing piece.  Students review the modeling text and discuss how the ending shows the environment and possible future for Ammon and Kaapo. During independent work time, students draft a conclusion to their historical writing piece that provides cohesion and a sense of closure. 

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 3, students write a response to the question, “How does Muir’s use of personification show us how he views nature? Use details in the text to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 3, Week 2, students write a four to five sentence response to the text “Queen Elizabeth 1 of England.” Students answer the question “Was Queen Elizabeth I an effective monarch?” Students are instructed to use text evidence and in addition, write one unimportant detail along with their response. 

  • In Unit 7, Week 2, students write a 1-2 paragraph response to the question “Compare and contrast the information "Ancient Egypt's Golden Empire" and "Rome's Augustan Age" provide about Egyptian and Roman architecture. What can you infer from this architecture about each civilization’s priorities and values?”

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

The majority of units feature text-based prompts or process writing prompts that explicitly require students to gather and use evidence from either anchor texts or outside sources such as websites. Evidence-based writing instruction occurs during writing lessons and includes intentional modeling, practice, and analysis. Teacher modeling typically uses graphic organizers or anchor charts, think-alouds, and underlining in the text where to find evidence. Each unit includes three writing prompts and 1–2 longer writing texts in which students must use text evidence in their responses.

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 6, the teacher models how to combine evidence and reasons from the text “Cassie's Fight” by Mildred D. Taylor to take a position on what qualities a true friend must have. The teacher uses the Source, Reason, and Text Evidence chart to model adding new information. 

  • In Unit 6, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 11, the teacher models how to use information from the Mentor Planning Guide to draft an informative/explanatory essay in response to the Mentor Writing Prompt. The teacher displays the Modeling Text, reads each paragraph, and explains what each paragraph entails. The modeling illustrates how to craft an introduction that engages readers’ attention and clearly identifies the topic of the essay, incorporate specific details and reasons to support the topic, and form a conclusion by restating the topic and ending with a question. Materials include a script and a Modeling text for teacher use.  

  • In Unit 8, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 6, the teacher models how to develop a multimedia presentation topic using specific facts and details. The teacher reads aloud the script from Mentor Multimedia Presentation: First Step and models how to analyze the facts and details used to support the explanation provided in the Mentor Multimedia Presentation. Materials include a script and a list of additional materials for teacher use. 

Writing opportunities focus around students’ analyses and claims developed from reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence.

  • In Unit 2, Weeks 1–3, students analyze a mentor writing prompt based on the short anchor texts they are reading. After teacher modeling and guided practice, students analyze their own prompt in Week 2: “Write a multiparagraph essay in which you take a position on what qualities a true friend must have. Use information and examples from ‘In Hiding’ and ‘Cassie’s Fight.’” Using the same skills modeled in Week 1, students analyze the texts, form a claim, and gather evidence to support their claim. In Week 3, students review, revise, and publish their response. 

  • In Unit 5, Weeks 1–3, students engage in process writing for an argumentative essay. The unit focus is technology, and the anchor texts share multiple perspectives on the use of robots in the workplace and self-driving vehicles. During Week 1, the teacher models how to begin creating a claim and gathering evidence to support the claim. Students self-select a topic and the topic does not have to connect to the unit texts. Teacher guidance includes, “[T]ell students to select a topic they have read about and to think about technology that interests them. Remind students that they want to select topics that are broad enough to support their claims with sufficient examples but narrow enough that they will be able to write a focused argument.”

  • In Unit 8, Weeks 1–3, students create a multimedia presentation that explores the Essential Question, “How does Earth itself inspire human endeavors?” During Week 1, the teacher introduces the Multimedia Presentation Checklist and models how to think about a multimedia presentation using the Mentor Multimedia Presentation resource. The teacher works with students to “[c]reate an anchor chart to identify the key features of a multimedia presentation.” Students work with partners to discuss possible purposes and audiences, brainstorm ideas related to Earth’s structure, evaluate topics, find credible sources for their topics, and generate ideas for visuals to include in their presentation. During Week 2, students begin drafting their presentations, including writing an introduction to their topic, developing the topic with supporting facts and details, and providing a concluding statement. Students also “[gather and select] images that support their topic and important ideas” and create “diagrams, charts, and tables to support important ideas in their scripts.” During Week 3, students revise their presentations “to include more multimedia components and formatting to aid the audience’s comprehension” and ensure their presentation “includes a variety of sentence patterns that will engage and interest [their] audience.” Students then rehearse and deliver their multimedia presentations to the class.

Indicator 1L
02/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations of Indicator 1n.

Materials provide explicit instruction for all grade-level grammar and usage standards. Student practice opportunities are designed to lead to mastery of the standards. Instruction on grammar and usage occurs in context within anchor reading texts and in grammar lessons provided in the writing block. Student practice is included in Grammar in Context lessons, the Phonics and Word Study Resource Book, and the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook. The Grammar & Spelling Activity Book contains opportunities to further reinforce students’ skills through guided practice, scaffolded learning, independent work, in class or for homework. Students routinely apply grammar and usage standards to their writing. All grammar lessons require students to return to their writing to edit for recently-taught skills, and students edit their writing for appropriate usage. 

Materials include explicit instruction of grammar and conventions standards for the grade level. For example:

  • Ensure that pronouns are in the proper case (subjective, objective, possessive).

    • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher defines subjective pronouns and displays the following list: I, he, she, it, they, we, you. The teacher uses the core text to model identifying subjective pronouns, and students practice identifying the subjective pronoun in an additional sentence from the core text.

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 1, Week 1, students choose the correct pronoun to complete two sets of sentences. Students identify incorrect pronoun usage in sentences and rewrite each sentence using the correct subjective pronouns. 

    • In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 13, the teacher uses the modeling text to identify objective pronouns and their antecedents. Students identify the objective pronoun and antecedent in the fourth sentence of the text and explain how they know it is an objective pronoun. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 1, Week 2, students choose the correct pronoun to complete two sets of sentences. Students identify incorrect pronoun usage in sentences and rewrite each sentence using the correct objective pronouns. 

    • In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 5, the teacher uses the core text to model identifying possessive pronouns. Students annotate a sentence from the core text, identifying possessive pronouns and explaining their function in the sentence.

      • In the Build-Write-Reflect e-Notebook, Unit 1, Week 3, students write a sentence with correct possessive pronoun usage.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 5, the teacher models underlining pronouns in paragraph eight from “Feyrouz the Brave'' in Character Matters. The teacher models making sure the pronouns are the correct case saying, “She is a sentence subject because Feyrouz is performing the action. She is a subjective pronoun; so, she is correct here.” The teacher points out that making sure the pronouns are in the correct case and verbs are the same tense makes text clearer and easier to understand.

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 2, Week 3, students complete sentences with the appropriate subjective, objective, or possessive pronoun. Students identify the incorrect pronoun in sentences and rewrite each sentence to include the correct pronoun. 

  • Use intensive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves).

    • In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher introduces reflexive and intensive pronouns and defines each. The teacher displays two sentences and models the use of yourself and myself. The margins contain the definition and examples of reflexive and intensive pronouns.

      • In the Build-Write-Reflect e-Notebook, Unit 6, Week 2, students write a sentence that pairs a noun or personal pronoun with a reflexive or intensive pronoun. 

    • In Unit 8, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher tells students that intensive pronouns refer back to and emphasize a noun or pronoun in a sentence but can be removed without changing its meaning. The teacher displays and reads aloud the Modeling Text from pages 12-16 of Exploring Earth’s Structures, modeling identifying the intensive pronoun.

      • In the Build-Write-Reflect e-Notebook, Unit 6, Week 2, students write a sentence that uses an intensive pronoun with an antecedent. 

  • Recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and person.

    • In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher reviews pronouns and states, “a pronoun must agree with its antecedent in number and person.” The teacher displays text, underlines the pronouns, and discusses the number and person for each pronoun. 

      • In the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 2, Week 1, students write a sentence containing pronouns that match numbers and people. 

      • In the Spelling and Grammar Activity Book, Unit 2, Week 1, students read sentences with inappropriate shifts in either number or person. Students circle the incorrect pronoun in each sentence then write the correct pronoun. 

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher uses the draft modeling text to model identifying and correcting pronouns that do not match in number or person. Students identify the remaining incorrect pronouns and revise the modeling text to include correct pronouns. 

      • In the Spelling and Grammar Activity Book, Unit 5, Week 1, students read sentences with inappropriate shifts in either number or person. Students circle the incorrect pronoun in each sentence then write the correct pronoun. 

  • Recognize and correct vague pronouns (i.e., ones with unclear or ambiguous antecedents).*

    • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher tells students that eliminating vague pronouns makes writing more effective. The teacher uses the modeling text to demonstrate how to ensure that pronouns correctly reflect their antecedent. Students write short paragraphs that contain at least two pronouns that reflect their antecedent.

      •  In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 1, Week 1, students complete the following activity: “In each sentence, underline the vague pronoun. Then rewrite the sentence correctly.”

    • In Unit 5, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher models recognizing and correcting vague pronouns saying, “When I read this text, I noticed the pronoun they and underlined it. But I was a bit confused at first--does this pronoun refer to the nouns areas or vents? If I look at the context clues, I can see that the pronoun describes something that produces ‘streams of mineral-rich fluids’. Although the sentence describes the areas where the vents are located, the vents are the ones producing the mineral-rich fluids. The pronoun refers to the vents. I’ll circle this word.” The teacher displays sentences from the core text, and students identify pronouns and their antecedents. Students discuss whether each pronoun is linked to an antecedent or whether it is a vague pronoun.

      •  In the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 5, Week 2, students write two sentences: one with a vague pronoun and another that corrects the vague pronoun. 

  • Recognize variations from standard English in their own and others' writing and speaking, and identify and use strategies to improve expression in conventional language.*

    • In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher introduces “why authors break rules of standard English” and points out that writers can use less formal English to show speech in a different dialect. The teacher models how to identify nonstandard English in the core text. Students use the practice text to identify examples of nonstandard English. Students revise the sentence to use conventional English. Students discuss the differences between the nonstandard and conventional versions of the text. Students discuss when it is appropriate and inappropriate to use variations in standard English in text.

      •  In the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 4, Week 2, students write a sentence that uses dialect or another variation from standard English. 

    • In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 13, the teacher models revising the unedited modeling text in Bud Caldwell’s authentic voice using variations from standard English. The teacher displays the edited sentences and reads them aloud, emphasizing the revisions.

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 4, Week 2, students complete the following activities: “Rewrite each sentence. Then rewrite it using standard English grammar and vocabulary. In the letter below, errors in standard English are underlined. Rewrite the letter using standard English grammar, spelling, punctuation, and vocabulary.”

  • Use punctuation (commas, parentheses, dashes) to set off nonrestrictive/parenthetical elements.

    • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher introduces using nonrestrictive elements in a sentence. The teacher displays a sentence and points out the use of the dash. 

    • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher defines nonrestrictive elements and uses the modeling text to model identifying nonrestrictive elements and combining two sentences to include a nonrestrictive element set off by commas. Students practice the same skills using the practice text. 

      • In the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 3, Week 1, students write a sentence using punctuation to set off two nonrestrictive elements. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 3, Week 1, students complete the following activity: “Rewrite each sentence. Use the punctuation named in parentheses ( ) to set off the nonrestrictive element.”

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher uses the unedited modeling text to model how to punctuate nonrestrictive and parenthetical text for clarity. Students use the practice text to identify nonrestrictive clauses and insert commas to edit the text. Students write and punctuate a sentence containing a nonrestrictive clause. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 7, Week 1, students use the punctuation indicated (commas, dashes, or parentheses) to set off a nonrestrictive element in a sentence. 

  • Spell correctly. 

    • In the Reference Materials Guide, Use Spelling Reference Materials Lesson, the teacher models using a print or digital dictionary to check the spelling of a word. The teacher models using guide words to locate the word and using the definition to confirm correct word choice. Students practice using a print dictionary to check the spelling of a word they had trouble spelling. 

    • In Unit 5, Additional Materials, Instructional Routines and Strategies, the Spelling Routine includes a three-step process for introducing, practicing, and assessing spelling words weekly. The routine consists of teacher modeling using word parts to spell words, partner and independent practice, cloze sentences, and writing sentences. 

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 5, the teacher reminds students to consult print or digital materials to confirm spelling accuracy.

  • Vary sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style.*

    • In Unit 4, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher states, “writers engage readers by varying sentences.” The teacher displays two sentences and explains the effect of the varying lengths. The teacher guides students in analyzing sentence lengths of four lines of text. 

      • In Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 4, Week 1, students write sentences or phrases in varying patterns by pairing longer complex sentences with simpler short sentences. 

    • In Unit 8, Week 3, Lesson 6, the teacher models evaluating their writing to improve it, saying, “When I reread this, I see that I use too many sentences that are the same length. It sounds choppy. I will use fewer simple sentences and expand some sentences to keep my viewers’ interest.” The teacher displays and reads aloud the Revision Modeling Text and discusses the revisions made. Students revise the practice text to vary sentence length and make the style stronger. Students revise their use of sentence variety in their drafts. 

  • Maintain consistency in style and tone.*

    • In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 3, the teacher demonstrates revising writing to maintain a formal style and tone. The teacher displays a text and makes changes, clarifying the purpose of each change. Students use the practice text to edit the text to present a formal style and tone. Students review their essays and make revisions to maintain a formal style and tone. Students discuss their revisions with a partner and share revisions with the class. 

    • In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 6, the teacher displays and reads aloud the Draft Modeling Text and models evaluating their writing for formal tone. “This draft sounds more like I’m stating my opinion to friends rather than writing a formal essay. I start with the phrase ‘as you know,’ which sounds like the beginning of an informal opinion and doesn’t provide the reader with useful information. I also use a contraction, quotation marks that indicate non-literal meaning rather than a quote from a source, and the slang word crummy.” The teacher displays the Revision Modeling Text and discusses the revisions with students. Students use the practice text to make revisions to maintain a formal style. The teacher reminds students that the formal style uses domain-specific language and avoids informal language, slang, and contractions. 

    • In Unit Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 5, the teacher tells students that writers often use dialogue and informal language to help show emotion. The teacher uses the core text to model identifying dialogue and how the dialogue helps maintain the style and tone of the writing. Students analyze a paragraph from the core text and determine how the author used sentence length to maintain a suspenseful tone. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 6, Week 3, students complete the following activity: “Read each pair of sentences. If the style and tone are consistent, write a checkmark on the line. If the style and tone are not consistent, write ‘no’ on the line.”

  • Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. For example:

    • In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 8, students edit their informative/explanatory essays focusing on varying sentence lengths during independent writing time.

    • In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 3, the teacher uses modeling text to model revising writing by varying sentence patterns. Students use the practice text to practice revising by varying sentence patterns, then revise their writing.

    • In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 6, during independent writing time, students revise their essays to have a more formal style.

Indicator 1M
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact with and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

The Program Support Guide provides a one-page Year-Long Vocabulary Development Plan which provides the focus word list for each week. Vocabulary relates to the Unit’s theme or topic and appears in the texts and activities students engage in during the lessons. Each unit focuses on different types of vocabulary development including Language of Instruction, General and Domain-Specific Vocabulary, and Word Study/Spelling. Within these focuses, students have opportunities to work with vocabulary including, but not limited to, context clues, determining meaning through roots and affixes, drawing, and acting out words. The digital Program Support Guide includes an expanded version of the Vocabulary Development Plan. Anchor text and close reading texts have selected vocabulary identified and provide brief opportunities for students to define and/or exemplify the words. Vocabulary is explicitly taught before reading each anchor text in various ways.

The Additional Materials section provides several graphic organizers such as a Concept Map or Frayer Model for vocabulary acquisition. Materials also provide a Vocabulary Development Tool that includes graphic organizers and a one-page explanation of the Define/Example/Ask routine which is the main vocabulary routine highlighted in each unit. Materials also provide a Multilingual Glossary that includes a definition, example, and image for each of the focus words for the units. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a year-long vocabulary development plan which lists the explicitly taught words by units and weeks. The list identifies the words as Tier 2 or Tier 3 words. While this document is labeled as a plan, it is a one-page list of words per unit.

  • The digital Program Support Guide includes an expanded version of the Vocabulary Development Plan. This plan highlights the vocabulary development research base and the key types of vocabulary instruction used in the materials.

  • The Teacher’s Resource System includes a Vocabulary Development section for each unit. This section provides a two-page overview of the Build Knowledge Word Bank, Language of Instruction, General Academic and Domain-Specific words, graphic organizers, and Word Study/Spelling supports. The Build Knowledge Word Bank lists the words that are explicitly taught in the first lesson of each unit and repeated throughout. The Vocabulary Development section also provides a chart that includes the Tier 2 and Tier 3 words that are found in each text. Materials highlight words that are explicitly taught at the beginning of each week and include images of the graphic organizers used to teach these words. Each identified word also includes the page number on which it appears in the student text. 

  • Materials provide a Vocabulary Development Tools resource. This resource contains printable vocabulary tools, including an analogy graphic organizer, a concept map, a Frayer model, a vocabulary word study log, vocabulary routines, and making meaning with words. There are two protocols in the Vocabulary Routine section: Define/Example/Ask and a Kate Kinsella routine. During the Kate Kinsella routine, the teacher introduces the word and provides verbal practice for students, and then students engage in written practice. 

  • Materials include Vocabulary Routines that the teacher can use to introduce vocabulary words. The routine that is stated in the teacher lesson plans is Define/Example/Ask; however teachers can choose to use the Academic Vocabulary Routine provided in Vocabulary Routines. While the directions for these routines state that teachers should review vocabulary every day, the actual lesson plan does not allot time or provide guidance on vocabulary review other than in the lessons where vocabulary is introduced or when the skill is vocabulary-related. Additionally, teacher guidance for using vocabulary words that are not explicitly taught is unclear.

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts.

  • The Vocabulary Development Plan notes that the Build Knowledge Vocabulary “words and phrases may or may not appear in the unit texts that students read. They were chosen to provide conceptual language that supports the unit topic and Enduring Understandings and for students to use as they communicate and grow their word knowledge within and across grades.” For example, in Unit 5, Unit Resources, Vocabulary Development, the Building Knowledge vocabulary words and phrases are innovations, advances/advancements, technological, insight, and equity. The vocabulary term technology appears in “Probing the Ocean Deep” by Kathy Furgang. Innovations, advances/advancements, insight, and equity do not appear in any of the unit texts that students read. 

  • In Unit 1, the focus is on Relationships in Nature. In Week 1, Lesson 1, the teacher introduces and explicitly teaches the Build Knowledge Vocabulary, which includes the words conservationist, ecosystem, impact, nature/natural, preserve/preservation, and restore. Students use these words to discuss the concepts and themes in the units, in addition to encountering some of them within the texts they read. In Lesson 10, prior to teaching the text, “Protectors of the Land: Wangari Maathai and John Muir” by Laura McDonald, the teacher provides additional instruction about the word preserve, which students encounter in the text along with preservation. In Lesson 2, students also encounter the word conservation when they read the text, “Marjory Stoneman Douglas: Friend of the Everglades” by ____.  They encounter the word conserve when they read “Protectors of the Land: Wangari Maathai and John Muir” by Laura McDonald in Lesson 10.

  • In Unit 7, Week 3, Lesson 1, during Build Vocabulary/Preview the Text, the teacher introduces four vocabulary words using the Define/Example/Ask Routine. Students will encounter these words as they read “The Golden Age of the Inca Empire” (author not cited). The teacher guide states, “Tell students that during independent time, they will encounter the Week 3 words again by reading the Vocabulary Practice Text on page 25 of the Texts for Close Reading and by completing vocabulary activities in their Build-Reflect-Write e-notebooks.” Some of these activities include answering vocabulary questions related to the Vocabulary Practice Text, answering questions connected to students’ experiences with the vocabulary words, writing a sentence using a vocabulary word, using vocabulary words to create labels and captions, and writing a poem using a vocabulary word.

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). 

  • In each unit, the Vocabulary Development tab within Unit Resources illustrates the vocabulary terms students will cover. Materials note that the Build Knowledge Word Bank terms “are explicitly introduced in Mini-Lesson 1, practiced each week in Texts from Close Reading “Build Vocabulary” activities, and used orally and in writing as students construct the Knowledge Blueprint, discuss the Essential Question and Enduring Understandings, and complete-building tasks.” The General Academic and Domain-Specific words “appear in this unit’s Texts for Close Reading selections. Highlighted words are explicitly taught during First Reading mini-lessons each week. Students encounter these words again as they read the weekly Vocabulary Practice Texts.” Because explicit instruction focuses on the highlighted words, many of the General Academic and Domain-Specific words listed are not addressed. 

  • Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice Text for each week. This short new text focuses on some of the vocabulary words from the anchor texts. Students read these texts independently and complete vocabulary tasks in their Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebooks.

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, students engage in a mini-lesson where they read a section of “Beyond Democracy” (author not cited). At the beginning of this mini-lesson, the teacher uses the Define/Example/Protocol to introduce several vocabulary words, such as transitioned, upheavals, and inherited. The teacher defines inherited as “Something inherited is received from a person who previously had ownership.” Then, the teacher provides an example, “I inherited a ring that belonged to my great-aunt.” Finally, the teacher asks students to turn and talk to their neighbor to answer the question, “What is something that might be inherited?”

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The majority of texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels, and materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards; however, materials do not provide explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the Standards. Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

20/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The majority of texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including “Government and Citizenship,” “Perspectives in Literature,” and “Earth Science.” Materials include anchor texts with accompanying Mini-Lessons in which students discuss and write their answers to text- dependent questions or tasks that address word choice, text structure, academic and figurative language, main ideas, and key details of the text. Materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Students learn about a topic or theme that is integrated throughout close readings and knowledge building texts; however, access to knowledge building texts cannot be ensured for all students as these readings occur during small group instruction. Most culminating tasks involve multiple literacy skills; however, the tasks follow a standard format that does not vary across the year. Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards; however, materials do not provide explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the standards. Materials include both short embedded research tasks and longer research projects.

Indicator 2A
02/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.

The majority of texts are organized around a topic or theme to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including “Government and Citizenship,” “Perspectives in Literature,” and “Earth Science.” Topics and themes are vertically aligned across K–6 to support knowledge building from year to year. Each unit lasts three weeks and contains Shared Reading, Mentor Reading, and Extended Reading texts related to the same topic; however, without using the small group Knowledge Building texts, which cannot be guaranteed for all students, students do not read enough texts to build knowledge of the unit topics. During whole group instruction, students engage in reading, writing, and discussion around the topic or theme and essential questions throughout each unit. Each unit includes a Knowledge Blueprint that serves as an anchor document throughout the unit. Tasks and questions are designed to build knowledge of the topic or theme throughout the unit to help students complete the Knowledge Blueprint.

Texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry/theme. Texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, texts are organized around the topic, “Legendary Journeys.” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate the unit purpose: “Readers will deepen their genre knowledge, and also their knowledge of how protagonists face challenges and conflict, by reading two genres: historical fiction (including a dramatic monologue) and traditional fiction.” The texts examine the essential question, “How can people inspire and change us?” The texts support the Enduring Understandings for Unit 2: “Characters' responses to events can shape the plot, just as characters can be shaped by events and their interactions with others. All fiction genres, whether dramas, traditional tales, or historical fiction, contain a protagonist, or leading character, who drives the narrative. The challenges a character faces—as well as how that character responds—form the basis for the theme, or message, the author wants to communicate. How an individual faces a challenge reveals important insights into that person's character.” The unit texts include, but are not limited to: 

    • In Week 1, students read “In Hiding,” a monologue by Anne Frank and “Jason’s Challenge,” an excerpt from The Golden Fleece and the Heroes who Lived Before Achilles) by Padraic Colum. Students analyze both texts to understand how a character rises to a challenge. 

    • In Week 2, the extended read is “Cassie’s Fight” an excerpt from Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry by Mildred D. Taylor, a historical fiction selection used to build students’ knowledge on the Jim Crow era. 

    • In Week 3, students complete the second extended read “Feyrouz the Brave,'' a retelling of an Arabian Nights tale by Wafa' Tarnowsk. This tale shows students a female protagonist and an example of historical fiction not typically included in the Western canon. The unit ends with a read aloud of the poem “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost. 

  • In Unit 6, texts are organized around the topic, “Characters at Crossroads.” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate the unit purpose: “This unit uses a variety of genres—including poetry, fantasy, and screenplays—to help students build knowledge about universal quest themes and protagonists.”  The texts examine the essential question, “What inspires a quest?” The texts support the Enduring Understandings for Unit 6: “A quest is a classic plot device in which a protagonist goes on a journey or search for something. The outer journey of the quest is usually accompanied by an inner journey, as the protagonist learns and grows. The lessons protagonists learn on quests can often be applied to real-life situations. Quest tales are a part of the oral or written tradition of nearly every known culture. Though a quest may be distinctly linked to a specific culture, these tales explore universal themes that can speak to all people.” The unit texts include, but are not limited to: 

    • In Week 1, students complete a Knowledge Blueprint as they read and identify the quest, the setting of the quest, and the theme of the quest. After reading “Eldorado” by Edgar Allen Poe and “The Broken Sphere,” an excerpt from Shadows of Sherwood by Kekla Magoon, students think about the messages delivered in each text and answer the question “What does this say, if anything, about the solitary nature of a quest?” Students add to the Knowledge Blueprint. 

    • In Week 2, after reading “The Ballad of Mulan” (Unknown Author) and the screenplay “Mulan Joins the Army” by Ouyang Yugian, students compare the two and answer the question, “Which text...helps you better understand why Mulan is considered a legendary hero?” 

    • In Week 3, after reading the text, “Midwinter Day” by Susan Cooper, students discuss the following question: “Why are certain characteristics important for going on a quest?” 

  • In Unit 10, texts are connected to the topic, “Forces: Going to Extremes.” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate the unit purpose: “In this unit, students will hit Grade 6 physical science standards by exploring forces, gravity, and motion, both on Earth and in space. They will build science knowledge by reading two genres: informational texts and opinion/argument texts.” The texts examine the essential question, “How does our knowledge of forces help us make sense of Earth and Beyond?” The texts support the Enduring Understandings for Unit 10: “Movement on Earth and in space is controlled by forces and motion. The force of gravity impacts all aspects of life on Earth and space exploration.  The laws of motion explain what happens when forces make things move and help people make accurate predictions.  The laws of motion explain what happens when forces make things move and help people make accurate predictions.  Humans use their understanding of forces and motion to carry out small and large scale tasks and make work more efficient, and to design and engineer simple and complex machines to solve problems.  Scientists, engineers, and mathematicians use their understanding of physics, forces, and motion to develop and engineer aeronautical vehicles and spacecraft that defy gravity and travel in and beyond Earth’s atmosphere. Texts in this unit include, but are not limited to: 

    • In Week 1, students read Mission to Mars by Ann Hodgeman and begin their Knowledge Blueprint by looking at problems presented in the text and at how scientific knowledge is applied to find solutions to the problems.

    • In Week 2, students read Flip, Spin, and Soar by Michael Sandler and add to the Knowledge Blueprint. Students discuss the question, “Why is it important to understand the science behind biking when it comes to BMX biking and bike racing?”

    • In Week 3, students read Track Cycling for Young People by Asha Sandler, Andrea Hawkins, and Jonathan Montre. Afterwards, students add to the Knowledge Blueprint. Students also read This Windmill by Amy Ludwig VanDerwater and determine how structure develops the narrator's point of view; however, this text does not support knowledge building of the unit topic. Students discuss their Knowledge Blueprint and complete their culminating project—writing a scientific explanation. Students demonstrate their knowledge in constructive conversations and independently write one to two paragraphs to demonstrate their knowledge of the essential question and enduring understandings.

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.

Materials include anchor texts with accompanying Mini-Lessons in which students discuss and write their answers to text- dependent questions or tasks that address word choice, text structure, academic and figurative language, main ideas, and key details of the text. Within the Mini-Lesson students frequently hold Constructive Conversations which include text-based prompts. Daily lessons, close-reading texts, and the student e-Notebook include opportunities for students to respond to questions. Strategies and Skills incorporate the language of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Most questions and tasks fully align to the Strategies and Skills and correlated standard, while other questions and tasks partially align to the correlated standard.

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, the Strategies and Skills page in the Teacher Resource System indicates that students learn about analyzing how part of a text contributes to plot development and describing a character’s response to plot events. For example: 

    • In Week 1, Lesson 7, the teacher reviews the five stages of plot and models how to identify the rising action in the text “In Hiding” from The Diary of Anne Frank: A Play dramatized by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. During the Constructive Conversation, students discuss their responses to the following prompt: “Read the remainder of Anne’s soliloquy. Underline two examples of text evidence that help you identify the scene as part of the rising action. Write your reasoning in the margin.” Students then participate in a brief Turn and Talk to discuss their responses to one of these two questions: “How is the rising action of the plot shaped by Anne’s responses to her circumstances? Based on the challenges Anne faces and her responses during the rising action, what message do you think the author is trying to communicate?” During independent work time, students write a response to the Apply Understanding question, “What can you infer about Miep and Mr. Kraler’s relationship to Anne? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.” This question does not directly connect to the lesson’s skill focus.

  • In Unit 5, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 4, students determine a central idea of a text. During the Constructive Conversation, students work with a partner to complete the following task: “Read and annotate paragraphs 1–9 of ‘Probing the Ocean Deep.’ Star the central idea and underline details that convey it.” During Apply Understanding, students independently read page 15 and identify key details that elaborate on the central idea. They summarize the central ideas and details from that page.

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will analyze how a part of a text contributes to the development of the plot.  While students analyze how scenes contribute to the plot, students do not “[a]nalyze how a particular sentence, chapter, scene, or stanza fits into the overall structure of a text,” as required by the standards. For example: 

    • In Week 3, Lesson 7, students engage in a lesson to understand how one section contributes to the development of the plot. With a partner, students respond to the following prompt: “Both ‘Feyrouz the Brave’ and ‘Jason’s Challenge’ contain scenes in which the main characters have fateful encounters with an old woman. Compare and contrast the way each of these scenes contributes to the plot of each story. Cite evidence from each text to support your thinking.” Then students engage in a Turn and Talk to discuss the following questions: “How do Feyrouz and Jason respond to their challenges? What do their responses show about their characters? How do these scenes contribute to the development the plot?”

  • In Unit 4, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will explain how an author develops points of view For example: 

    • In Week 1, Lesson 7, students examine how an author develops the point of view in poetry. Students reread “Up Hill” by Christina Rossetti and “...identify three metaphors to help you determine the speakers’ points of view.” Then students participate in a Turn and Talk to answer the following question: “Enduring Understanding 1 in this unit states that every story—both real and fictional—has a point of view that affects the way it is told. How does Christina Rossetti’s use of metaphors affect the way ‘Up‑Hill’ is told? What does it show about the poet’s point of view?”

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.

Materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. Each instructional day includes a reading mini-lesson designed to build content knowledge and practice literacy skills and strategies using the anchor texts. Each week, the student e-book also includes a Build Knowledge Across Texts question in which students respond to a prompt to synthesize information or analyze multiple texts. The majority of questions included in the Constructive Conversation, Apply Understanding, and Build Knowledge sections require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts, as well as across multiple texts. Questions connect to topics or themes and texts for each unit, allowing for analysis through discussion and writing tasks. Materials provide questions and prompts in direct teaching mini-lessons, small group or paired tasks, and independent work time. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 5, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will integrate information in different media or formats to develop a coherent understanding. Although students read different texts, students do not “[i]ntegrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue,” as required by the standards. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 12, students integrate information in different formats to develop an understanding of the text. Students review the content in the sidebar and the written text. During the Constructive Conversation, students complete the following task: “Read the sidebar on page 15. How does the sidebar ‘Ocean Research: A Cost-Benefit Analysis’ support the central idea of ‘Probing the Ocean Deep’? Support your thinking with evidence from the text.” Students annotate their text as they identify evidence and then compare their responses with a partner. During Apply Understanding, students independently respond to the following prompt: “How does the diagram ‘The Water Cycle’ help readers understand the information presented in ‘Ocean Research: A Cost-Benefit Analysis’? Write 4–5 sentences describing how the diagram is connected to the text.”

  • In Unit 8, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will compare and contrast the experience of reading a story to listening to or viewing a story. For example: 

    • In Week 1, Lesson 7, students compare and contrast the experience of reading a story to listening to a story. Students underline important details in the text “The South Pole” by Jules Verne  that describe Pierre ronnax and Captain Nemo. Students write some words that would describe each character and their relationship with each other. Then, students work on the second part of the task: “Listen to the audio version of the text on page 5. Annotate and make notes on any new ideas you have regarding the characters. How does your description of the characters and their relationship in the audio version differ from your ideas when you read the text? What changed your ideas?” Students discuss with a partner.

Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts.

  • In Unit 1, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will compare and contrast authors’ presentations of events. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 12, students compare and contrast authors’ presentation of events. The teacher models comparing and contrasting a biography and autobiography and how the authors develop two different aspects of an idea. During Guided Practice, students work with a partner to respond to the following question: “Compare and contrast ‘Protectors of the Land’ and ‘Fascinating World of Nature’ and the ways Wangari Maathai and John Muir wrote about nature. How do the differences and similarities in MacDonald’s Muir biography and Maahai’s autobiography help you understand the ways these two activists raised awareness about nature?”

  • In Unit 6, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will compare and contrast how texts in different genres approach a similar theme. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 12, students compare and contrast two texts' approaches to themes. During the Constructive Conversation, students discuss their responses to the following question, “Compare and contrast the ways ‘The Ballad of Mulan’ and ‘Mulan Joins the Army’ approach the same theme of duty. Cite specific details from each text in your comparison across text.” During Apply Understanding, students independently answer the following question: “Compare and contrast the ways in which the poem, ‘The Ballad of Mulan’ and the passage, ‘The Broken Sphere’ address how parents influence children’s lives. Cite specific details from each text in your analysis of this theme.”

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.

All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Students learn about a topic or theme that is integrated throughout close readings and knowledge building texts; however, access to knowledge building texts cannot be ensured for all students as these readings occur during small group instruction. Most culminating tasks involve multiple literacy skills; however, the tasks follow a standard format that does not vary across the year. The format includes holding a Constructive Conversation about the central topic/essential question and completing a Write to Demonstration Knowledge task, which entails responding to each Enduring Understanding in the unit. The culminating task, conversations, and writing take place across the last two days of the unit. Students begin planning their culminating task product during a mini-lesson; however, students are typically expected to complete the task for homework or during independent time. On the last day, students hold a Constructive Conversation about the unit topic during the whole group time, and then complete the Write to Demonstrate Knowledge independently.

Culminating tasks are evident across the year and multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, students begin working on the culminating task, as they write questions about the naturalists they are reading about. In Week 3, Lesson 10, students complete the culminating task, creating a nature interview, for homework. In Week 3, Lesson 14 students share their interview with their group and discuss the following questions: “What did you learn about conservationists and the work they do? How has learning about other people’s relationships with nature impacted your outlook on nature? What new thoughts about the Essential Question do you have?”

  • In Unit 3, students begin working on their culminating task product—making a brief plan for a new government by identifying three principles to guide it, a leader structure, and ways citizens will participate. The Build Toward a Culminating Task section in Week 3, Lesson 10 includes the following questions: “How has the role of the queen changed? Who holds the power in this type of government?” For independent work and homework, students complete their plan. In Week 3, Lesson 14, students finish the remaining culminating task activities, including holding a Constructive Conversation about the essential question and what they learned about the role of government in different societies. During independent time, students complete the Write to Demonstrate Knowledge portion of the task on each Enduring Understanding listed for the unit. As students write a response in their e-notebook for each understanding, the directions for the task prompt students to use the texts they have read and the research they have done for their Research and Inquiry Projects.

  • In Unit 6, students complete the first step of their culminating task, which is to “create a quest job description.” Students choose two traits that someone going on a quest would need. Materials provide an Identifying Character Traits strategy for students needing more support. In Week 2, Lesson 14, students discuss the different versions of Mulan and add two more traits that would be necessary for a quest job experience. In Week 3, Lesson 10, students discuss the elements of a quest and the theme of their text. Students add two more character traits to their lists. Students complete the task for homework. Directions for the task include thinking of a title and a name of the company hiring, and writing a one-paragraph description of the job including the traits necessary for the job. Students use the Blueprint, text annotations, and job descriptions to complete the unit wrap-up.

Indicator 2E
02/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.

Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards; however, materials do not provide explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the Standards. Writing mini-lessons occur daily for at least 15 minutes depending on the instructional time block used. Each unit focuses on writing in response to text-based prompts or process writing. The program uses a repetitive instructional process, rubrics, and protocols for all writing across grade levels. In addition to mentor texts, materials provide instructional resources for teacher use such as anchor charts, writing checklists, modeling scripts, and potential  student responses. 

Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level; however, the distribution of standards-aligned writing instruction does not support students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a K–6 year-long writing plan in the Program Support Guide. This one-page plan provides a brief overview of each unit writing focus, the Research and Inquiry Project, and on-demand opportunities in the reading materials. The Program Support Guide also includes a Skills Scope and Sequence that indicates which writing types students will focus on each week.

  • Writing instruction follows a repetitive process. During Week 1, the teacher and students analyze a mentor writing text, and the teacher models various skills. Although short writing mini-lessons include teacher modeling and guided practice, the lessons do not embed time for students to write, peer review, revise, and publish work. Students are expected to complete these tasks during independent time. During Week 2, the teacher continues modeling skills students will need as they begin planning and drafting a writing product. During Week 3, students finalize, revise, and publish their work. While materials provide rubrics for peer and teacher evaluation, these rubrics are the same across all grades.

  • The distribution of writing modes required by the standards is as follows: 35/35/30 opinion/informative or explanatory/narrative writing. Materials reflect an approximate 28/36/36 balance. Each unit focuses on one type of writing:

    • In Unit 1, there are 15 lessons on informative/explanatory writing, leading students to use facts and evidence to plan, draft, revise, and edit informative essays on a prompt related to nature.

    • In Unit 2, there are 15 lessons on opinion writing, leading students to state opinions about characters and support their opinions with evidence from the text.

    • In Unit 3, there are 15 lessons on informative/explanatory writing, leading students to write an informative/explanatory essay on a topic related to government.

    • In Unit 4, there are 15 lessons on narrative writing, leading students to write their own narratives.

    • In Unit 5, there are 15 lessons on opinion writing, leading students to write an opinion essay on a technology related issue. 

    • In Unit 6, there are 15 lessons on writing to text based prompts: informative/explanatory, opinion, and narrative writing.  

    • In Unit 7, there are 15 lessons on narrative writing, leading students to write a narrative.

    • In Unit 8, there are 15 lessons on research writing, in which students choose a topic related to Earth Science, select sources, and plan, draft, revise, and edit texts, incorporating facts and details from the sources. 

    • In Unit 9, there are 15 lessons in which students conduct research, create a multimedia presentation, and present it to their peers.  

    • In Unit 10, there are 15 lessons on poetry writing. In which students study mentor poetry and draft, revise, and edit their own poems.  

Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Each unit provides daily mini-lessons for writing which include teacher modeling supports, anchor charts, writing checklists, mentor writing prompts and source texts, strategies, graphic organizers, and additional instructional materials. Materials follow a similar design, lesson template, pacing structure, and protocol list across Grades 3–6. The mini-lessons occur daily but recommend short time frames for instruction. Lesson language and expectations for writing are similar across all grades. For example: In Unit 5, the additional materials include an argument essay writing checklist, a five-column chart, an argument essay planning guide, and a rubric.  

  • Each Unit Assessment includes a 4-Point Assessments rubric. The rubric is consistent across all the writing tasks, with only the type of writing changing. For example, the rubric for the informative/explanatory essay is listed below. The rubric for the opinion essay is exactly the same with the exception of the change in writing type from “informative/explanatory” to “opinion.”

    • “It is clearly organized and effectively incorporates details from sources.

    • It has all of the features of informative/explanatory writing. 

    • The writer follows rules of grammar and sentence structure.

    • The writer follows conventions of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.”

Indicator 2F
04/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.

Materials include both short embedded research tasks and longer research projects. At the end of each unit, students have the opportunity to complete a three-week Research and Inquiry Project for the first four units and a six-week project in the remaining six units. Research projects follow six steps: Choose, Explore, Interpret, Create, Present, and Reflect. Materials include explicit instruction on a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. The research tasks and research projects are not embedded in the instructional plan for the daily lessons. Recommendations for incorporating the projects in the curriculum include using small group/independent time, homework, and other content time such as the science or social studies instructional block. Some units include shorter embedded research tasks, such as researching topics for writing and evaluating sources, that usually connect to the unit’s writing tasks.  

Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • Guidance for the Research and Inquiry Projects for each task includes six mini-lessons focused on the following topics: Choose, Explore, Interpret, Create, Present, and Reflect.  

      • Step 1: Choose: The focus of this mini lesson is on choosing a topic.   The teacher introduces the project, sets a purpose, guides topic choice, introduces the Research and Inquiry Project Tool, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 2: Explore: The focus of this mini lesson is on students generating questions and gathering sources. The teacher sets a purpose, guides question design and source selection, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 3: Interpret: The focus of this mini lesson is on researching and taking notes. The teacher sets a purpose, guides research and fact gathering, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 4: Create: The focus of this mini lesson is on designing and constructing the research project. The teacher sets a purpose, guides design and creation, sends off, and wraps up.

      • Step 5: Present: The focus of this mini lesson is on sharing and building knowledge together. The teacher sets a purpose, guides preparing and presenting, sends off, and wraps up.

      • Step 6: Reflect: The focus of this mini lesson is on assessing and self-reflecting. The teacher sets a purpose, guides self-assessment and self-reflection, sends off, and wraps up. These six steps are repeated for each of the Research and Inquiry Projects completed with little variation, other than the topic. For example:

        • In Unit 1, the research project is to research a person or group who protects and restores nature, and create a presentation to share the information. The presentation should include facts about a topic, and may include visuals and/or audio. Students may choose to make a brochure or ad, a video biography, or an idea of their own. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources. The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search and List, and Decide strategy. First, the teacher chooses a sentence stem and adds the topic. Next, the teacher confirms the guiding questions do not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful. Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, and rephrasing the information. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

        • In Unit 4, the research project is to research one of the authors covered in the unit and then create an author study.  The research project can be a written or typed biography, a podcast interview with the author, an interactive author bulletin board or an idea selected by the student. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources. The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search and List, and Decide strategy. First, the teacher chooses a sentence step and adds the topic. Next, the teacher confirms this guiding question does not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful. Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot, strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, and rephrasing the information. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

        • In Units 9–10, the research project is to research an ancient or modern trade route other than the Silk Road and create a research report that can take the form of a written or typed report, annotated map, poster, digital slide show, or an idea of choice. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources. The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search and List, and Decide strategy.  First, the teacher chooses a sentence step and adds the topic. Next, the teacher confirms this guiding question does not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful.  Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, and rephrasing the information. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit contains a Knowledge Blueprint in which the students gather information related to the Enduring Understandings for the unit. While reading each text, the students add information to the Blueprint. The information added to the Blueprint builds over the course of each three-week unit, allowing students to build knowledge on the unit topic from various sources. The Blueprint also contains critical vocabulary that is used and referenced various times throughout the unit.

  • The Research and Inquiry Projects include the following teacher supports:

    • Research and Inquiry Project Tool for students to complete as they plan their project. The teacher can use the tool to focus students on the research step they are on. The tool can be interactive; the teacher can write notes or reminders to students during the project. The teacher can also use the tool to assess students at the end of the research project.

    • Strategy bank tools that explain the various strategies included in the mini lessons, such as Talk, Jot, Choose; Question, Search, Decide; Read, Interpret, Jot; Read, Design, and Create; Plan, Present, and Ask; an Question, Remember, Jot

    • Addressing the needs of multilingual learners

    • Making time for research and inquiry

    • How to group students:  Flexible grouping to promote learning

    • Using the Research and Inquiry Project Tool to support and assess students

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, the teacher conducts a mini-lesson on selecting credible print and digital sources. Materials include a script to support the teacher with modeling how to assess the credibility of sources. The script directs the teacher to create a three-column chart and model how to use the chart to organize their sources and evaluate their credibility: “When we research our topics, we should assess our sources to determine if they are credible before using them in our essays. During my initial research while brainstorming, I read a few websites to help me develop my question about Poland and its transition to a democracy. I evaluated my sources with the following questions: What are the credentials of the person or people who create and maintain the site? Does the author or sponsor have a strong bias or opinion? When was the content created?” 

Materials provide opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 3, students develop their focus for an informative/explanatory essay related to why societies form different governments. In Lesson 6, students select knowledge and credible online resources. In Lesson 9, students gather notes from their online sources. In Lesson 11, students use information from their research to begin to plan their essay. In Week 3, Lesson 13, students complete their essay.  

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 3, students brainstorm potential topics for an opinion essay on a technology topic of the students choosing. In Lesson 6, students select knowledgeable and credible sources in print and online.  In Lesson 9, students research and take notes from the print and online sources. In Lesson 11, students use their research to begin formatting/writing their essay. In Week 3, Lesson 13, students complete their essay.  

  • Students draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, students write an explanatory essay in which they discuss effective ways to protect nature, based on ideas from “Marjory Stoneman Douglas” (author not cited) and “Protectors of the Land” (author not cited). In Week 1, Lesson 6, students use the two texts to find facts and details related to those from the mentor text.  

    • In Unit 6, students imagine they traveled west on the Oregon Trail and write a journal entry describing what they saw and felt on the first day of their journey. In Week 1, Lesson 9, students use the Mentor Text “Traveling West” (author not cited) and the student text “A Night to Remember”(author not cited) to find evidence they would like to include in their response to the prompt.

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

06/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Materials include 10 units over the course of the year. Each unit encompasses three weeks of lessons. Each daily lesson is designed to take roughly 60–65 minutes. Materials provide alternative options for 150-, 120-, or 90-minute literacy blocks. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.

Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Students have opportunities to answer questions about illustrations, plot, and characters. Students practice activities such as comparing and contrasting charts, retelling details, and answering standards-aligned questions about texts. At times, students focus on comprehension strategies that may not align to standards. Although the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart illustrates when standards repeat across the year, it is unclear which learning target aligns to the instructional content and questions and tasks within each lesson. 

Over the course of each unit, some of the instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • All Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are taught in the school year according to the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart. Materials use general learning goals rather than CCSS, which sometimes focus on skills that are implied within the standards. It is unclear which portions of the lesson align to the learning goals listed.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 12, students engage in a lesson to determine the theme. The teacher models determining the theme of the poem “A Road not Taken” by Robert Frost by pointing out features such as descriptive and figurative language. This instruction does not fully align to RL.6.2: “Determine a theme or central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.”

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 12, the teacher models tracing and evaluating the author’s argument. During Guided Practice, students read pages 7 and 8 of “Robots in the Workplace” and put a star next to evidence that supports the claim that robots in the workplace are a great idea. Students also identify a counterclaim, find evidence that supports the counterclaim and evidence that the author refutes the counterclaim. This instruction does not fully align to RI.6.8: “Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.” Although the teacher models finding evidence to support the claim, the teacher does not model how to find a counterclaim or evidence that the author refutes the counterclaim.

Over the course of each unit, some questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Questions and tasks are mostly aligned to the skills addressed in each of the lessons. While many of the skills support the standards, not all skills are standards aligned. Some questions and tasks are repetitive based on the skill being taught and do not address the depth of each standard. Students typically answer one or two leading questions during the lesson and two to three questions independently per core text. The limited number of questions posed to students also limits alignment to the standards across the year. Questions are not labeled according to the standards and teachers would have to determine the alignment on their own.

    • In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 7, students read the final portion of Anne’s soliloquy in “In Hiding” from The Diary of Anne Frank: A Play dramatized by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. During guided practice, students “[u]nderline two examples of text evidence that help you identify the scene as part of the rising action. Write your reasoning in the margin.” This task does not fully align to RL.6.2: “Analyze how a particular sentence, chapter, scene, or stanza fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the theme, setting, or plot.”  

    • In Unit 7, Week 2, Lesson 8, students independently answer Question 1 on page 18 of Achievements of Ancient Cultures (author not cited). The question states, “In paragraph 2 of “Rome’s Augustan Age,” we learn that Augustus once said, “I found Rome a city of bricks and left it a city of marble.” How well do the paragraphs that follow support Augustus’s claim? Support your ideas with specific text evidence and examples from the text.” This question aligns to RI.6.8: “Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.”

Over the course of each unit, some assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. 

  • Teacher materials include a Weekly and Unit Assessment tab that includes the print version of three assessments for each unit. Materials also provide an Answer Key and Item Rationales document that indicates the DOK level, standard alignment for each assessment question, and rationales for correct and incorrect answers; however, the standard listed does not always align to the assessment question.   

    • In Unit 1, Week 2, Assessment, students read a short passage along with a chart and mostly answer multiple-choice questions. Examples include, but are not limited to: 

      • “Which detail from the passage helps explain the purpose of a conservation easement?” (DOK 2, RI.6.4) 

      • “Which key idea is most developed in the passage?” (DOK 2, RI.6.3) 

      • “Which two details show that The Land Trust for Tennessee has helped Tennessee maintain its natural beauty?” (DOK 3, RI.6.2) This assessment question does not fully align to RI.6.2: “Determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.”

    • In Unit 9, Unit Assessment, students read two short passages, along with a map and a graph, and answer multiple-choice, short answer, and longer response writing items including, but not limited to:

      • In Passage 1, what is the purpose of paragraphs 2 and 3? (DOK 3, RI.6.6) This assessment question does not fully align to RI.6.6: “Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text.”

      • Which two details from Passage 1 best show how Native Americans used horses to improve their lives? (DOK 3, RI.6.1) 

      • Which idea from Passage 1 is supported by the map? (DOK 2, RI.6.7) This does not fully align to RI.6.7: “Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.”

      • Think about the two passages you have read. According to these passages, how did people from other countries affect the native peoples they came in contact with in North America and Hawaii? (Constructed Response, DOK 3, RI.6.9) This does not fully align to RI.6.9: “Compare and contrast one author's presentation of events with that of another (e.g., a memoir written by and a biography on the same person).”

By the end of the academic year, standards are addressed within and across units; however, students may not master the full intent of the standard.

  • RL.6.3 is taught in Units 2, 4, and 6 according to the correlation chart: “ Describe how a particular story's or drama's plot unfolds in a series of episodes as well as how the characters respond or change as the plot moves toward a resolution.”

    • In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 7, students examine how a section of text contributes to the development of the plot. The teacher models this by creating an anchor chart with the stages of a plot, such as the exposition, the climax, and the resolution. Students work with a partner to respond to the following prompt: “Read the remainder of Anne’s soliloquy. Underline two examples of text evidence that help you identify the scene as part of the rising action. Write your reasoning in the margin.” Students do not describe how the plot unfolds in a series of episodes or describe “how characters respond or change as the plot moves toward a resolution.” 

    • In Unit 4, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 7, students engage in a lesson on the point of view in a poem. Students identify and explain figurative language in the poem and use this information to determine the point of view.  This does not fully align to RL.6.4: “Explain how an author develops the point of view of the narrator or speaker in a text.”

    • In Unit 6, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 4, students engage in a lesson to describe how a character changes as the plot develops. Students engage in a Constructive Conversation to respond to the prompt, “How does Will’s demeanor change as he talks to the old man? What can we infer about Will’s character from this change? Support your thinking with details from the text.” Then students work independently to write 1–2 paragraphs to answer the question, “Compare and contrast how the old man responds to Will and to the Rider. What can you infer about all these characters from this reaction? Support your thinking with details from the text.” Although students describe how characters respond or change, students do not describe how the plot unfolds in a series of episodes. 

  • RI.6.8 is taught in Units 5, 7, and 10 according to the correlation chart: “Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.”

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 12, students trace and evaluate an author’s argument. The teacher models using the text Robots in the Workplace by Anna Miller to locate the details that support the author’s argument. Students read the next section of the text and work with a partner to annotate and evaluate the author’s argument. It is unclear whether students distinguish between claims that are supported by reasons and evidence and those that are not.

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 7, students trace an author’s argument. During the Constructive Conversation, students respond to the following prompt: “Catherine Goodridge claims that Greece’s ‘Golden Age’ was a time when art flourished and the people were dedicated to gods and goddesses. How do the images and captions in the text support this claim? Underline important details and jot your notes in the margin.” This does not align to RI.6.8; rather, it aligns to RI.6.7: “Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.”

    • In Unit 10, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 10, trace an author’s argument. During the Constructive Conversation, students respond to the following prompt: “In the third paragraph, the author states, ‘Today's extreme bikers still seem magical.’ How does the author use scientific concepts to help the reader understand this claim? Cite evidence from the text in your response.” During independent time, students respond to the question, “In the section about bike racing, the author says, ‘Bike racing doesn't seem complicated.’ Do the text and image details support this statement or refute it? Cite evidence from the text in your response.” 

Indicator 2H
02/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.

Materials include 10 units over the course of the year. Each unit encompasses three weeks of lessons. Each daily lesson is designed to take roughly 60–65 minutes. Materials provide alternative options for 150-, 120-, or 90-minute literacy blocks. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time. Additionally, many tasks are pushed into independent or small group time and according to their time frame, those two time periods include many tasks from the core lesson. Materials also provide optional activities, such as Research and Inquiry Projects, a Novel Study in each unit, and Media Literacy lessons, but there is limited guidance on how to schedule these into instruction. Additionally, the time needed for implementation may not be feasible within a 90- or 120-minute block. Although materials recommend assessments for each unit, materials do not dedicate time for their administration. The Comprehensive Literacy Planner for each week indicates that assessments can be given “at the end of the week,” but there is not a specific time frame built in for their administration.  

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials contain a Comprehensive Literacy Planner for each week within a unit. The Comprehensive Literacy Planner lays out the Read-Aloud, Phonics and Word Study Lessons, Comprehension Lessons, Writing & Language Lessons, Small-Group Reading Ideas, Independent Reading & Conferring Ideas, Independent Writing & Conferring Ideas, and Assessment recommendations. Although the planner gives a suggested time frame for lessons, the planner does not include time frames for small group and independent work.

  • The Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes the following guidance for Small-Group Reading: “Meet with small groups of students to: scaffold reading behaviors and strategies using small-group texts, teacher’s guides, and prompting cards, build fluency using the reader’s theater scripts and Readers Theater Handbook lessons, Revisit complex texts in Texts for Close Reading, See additional small-group suggestions on the Unit Foldout.” Under Independent Reading & Conferring the Planner provides this guidance: “During independent time: Ensure that all students read independently to build volume and stamina, Confer with a few students on their text selections, application of strategies, and knowledge building tasks, see additional independent suggestions (including the Research and Inquiry Project) on the Unit Foldout.”

Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials provide pacing options for 150-, 120-, and 90-minute literacy blocks. Each option includes suggested time frames for the Read Aloud, Reading and Word Study, and Writing and Grammar lesson components.

    • 150-Minute Literacy Block

      • Read-Aloud: 15 minutes

      • Reading and Word Study: 75 minutes

      • Writing and Grammar: 60 minutes

    • 120-Minute Literacy Block

      • Read-Aloud: 10 minutes

      • Word Study: 60 minutes

      • Writing and Grammar: 50 minutes

    • 90-Minute Literacy Block

      • Reading & Word Study: 50 minutes

      • Writing & Grammar: 40 minutes

  • Within those three pacing options the time allotted for Reading and Word Study is 75 minutes, 60 minutes, and 50 minutes, respectively. Reading and Word Study includes the Comprehension and Word Study Mini-lessons and Independent and Small Group time. The Reading and Wordy Study portion of the day includes 30 minutes of planned lessons. According to the pacing options given for the above literacy blocks that would leave 45, 30, and 20 minutes of Independent/Small Group time, respectively. Students also receive tasks to complete during independent time or for homework.

  • The implementation schedule for each Unit provides a time frame of 60-65 minutes for each part of the daily lesson.

    • Read Aloud: 10 minutes

    • Reading and Vocabulary Mini-lessons: 15 minutes per lesson

    • Small-Group Lesson:10–15 minutes per group

    • Writing and Language Mini-lessons: 15 minutes

    • Word Study Mini-lessons: 15 minutes 

    • Assessments are listed, but materials do not include a suggested time frame for their administration.

  • In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 4, the Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes teaching Mini-lesson 9 and 10. These two lessons require a total of 30 minutes. Students also receive two tasks to complete during independent time. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 3, Mini-lesson 2, the suggested time to complete this part of the lesson is 15 minutes. The teacher spends one minute introducing the lesson’s focus. Then the teacher spends two minutes modeling how to use Latin roots to determine the meaning of words. Students have five minutes to work with a partner to read and add to a list of words using the roots sub, inter, vis, dorm, and sur. Then students spend three minutes choral reading a paragraph and watching the teacher model using Latin roots to figure out the meaning of a word. During the next three minutes, students choral read the spelling words and the teacher guides students in finding the Latin roots. The teacher gives instruction for independent time during the last minute of the lesson. 

Optional tasks may distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Research & Inquiry Projects Teacher Guide, the Making Time for Research & Inquiry section provides suggestions for incorporating Research & Inquiry into the school day. One option suggests building Research & Inquiry into the small-group time. Materials list a possible schedule for this option, and all of the options take 15 minutes out of small group time. A second option entails completing the bulk of the work at home, once daily instruction concludes. The third option recommends pushing the project into science or social studies instructional time, with the selected content area dependent upon the best correlation for the project. 

  • Materials contain a Media Literacy Handbook. This resource contains lessons introducing students to types of media, messages, and uses. Guidance notes, “This handbook acts as a lesson bank that can be used in any order, depending on need and interest.”

  • Materials include a novel for conducting a Novel Study. Resources to support this instruction can be found in the Novel Study tab of the digital platform. The digital version of the novel contains a Teacher Resources icon at the top of the page. Clicking here launches the Novel Guide, which contains three sections: Guide at a Glance, Novel Plot Summary, and Student Guide. This guide provides the Lexile level of the novel, three reading options—independent, partner, peer group—and pacing suggestions. The Student Guide section includes various supports, such as planners, writing prompts, and charts, for student use before, during, and after reading. 

  • Materials provide resources to conduct Book Clubs. The schedule section of Small Group and Independent Resources describes cycling between a common novel for a few weeks, Book Clubs for about three weeks, and individual books for a few weeks. Materials provide ideas for mini-lessons, selecting books, and running the Book Clubs; however, materials do not provide lessons for conducting Book Clubs.

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials include Intervention Teaching Guides for Comprehension and Language. The Introduction for teachers states, “Benchmark Advance Intervention is intended for students who need extra support to master grade-level skills. It offers reteaching and additional practice to reinforce instruction in the core program.” The intervention lessons parallel the instruction in the core program and are designed to last 15 minutes.

  • Materials contain a Grammar, Spelling & Vocabulary Activity book. The resource links to each week’s grammar and spelling/vocabulary focus and includes four practice pages for each week. The pages provide practice for the targeted goals, as well as a review of previously taught skills. The introduction states, “The activities are designed for flexible use in the classroom.”

  • Research and Inquiry Projects connect to the unit topics and themes and support the building knowledge requirements in each unit. For example, the Unit 3 topic is “Beyond Democracy,” and students “[r]esearch a country’s form of government,” during the Research & Inquiry Project.  

  • Research and Inquiry Projects loosely connect to skills and standards in the unit. For example, in Unit 1, students are focusing on identifying central ideas and key ideas, and comparing the author’s presentation of ideas. During the Research & Inquiry Project, students “[r]esearch a group or person who focuses on nature conservation” and create a presentation on that group. 

  • Optional materials connect with the unit topic or theme and essential question. For example, the Unit 6 theme and essential questions are about quests. The small group texts include, but are not limited to, “The Red-Tail Angels” by Tiffani Gaestel, a book about the Tuskegee Airmen. The program lists trade books that support the theme and essential questions including, but not limited to “Growing Up in Coal Country '' by Susan Bartoletti. This story tells the story of immigrant families' struggles in a Pennsylvania mining town. 

  • Optional materials connect with the unit’s overall standards focus. For example, the focus standards examine determining themes and comparing themes, and the small group text “Robin Hood Shoots for the Queen” retold by Jeannette Sanderson focuses on determining a theme. 

  • Materials include optional Read-Aloud Extending Activities; however, these activities are generic and are the same for every unit. For example, some activities include “Character Reflection,” during which students write words or phrases that they are thinking about the character. After sharing their thoughts with a partner, students create a list poem with the words and phrases. 

  • Although the lessons are primarily for building fluency, the optional Reader’s Theater materials connect to each unit’s topic or theme and essential question. For example, the Unit 8 topic is about Earth structures and how that inspires human endeavors. During the text “Demeter and Persephone” by Joanna Korba, students answer questions about the water and its impact on people, such as “Why do the people give thanks to Demeter? How does she help them?”

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

Indicator 3A
00/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

Indicator 3B
00/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

Indicator 3C
00/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

Indicator 3E
00/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

Indicator 3F
00/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

Indicator 3I
00/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

Indicator 3J
00/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

Indicator 3K
00/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

Indicator 3M
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3N
00/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

Indicator 3Q
00/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

NE = Not Eligible. Product did not meet the threshold for review.
NE

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.