About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Benchmark Advance | ELA
ELA K-2
The instructional materials for grades K, 1, and 2 meet the expectations of alignment, building knowledge, and usability. Most texts are of high quality and include rigorous reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language practice. Students have opportunities to engage with texts and tasks that promote knowledge building. Supports for teachers to implement the materials with fidelity are clear and include guidance for differentiation to authentically grow students’ skills.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 2nd Grade
Alignment Summary
The Benchmark Grade 2 materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.
2nd Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Some of anchor texts used in the Benchmark program are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level; however, some texts are low-quality. The mentor read-aloud texts, shared readings, and poetry texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade level according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and a relationship to their associated student task. Materials include standards-aligned, text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments that support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied and require students to engage with the text directly. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in partner discussions, after listening to or rereading texts. On-demand writing opportunities occur as students respond to text-based prompts and complete short, focused projects, such as writing an opinion piece about their favorite character from the text, and materials include opportunities for students to engage in process and evidence-based writing during every unit. Materials include systematic and explicit instruction in phonological awareness and phonics, including a scope and sequence based on the expected hierarchy to build toward students’ application of foundational skills. Materials provide a range of foundational skills assessments, including formal and informal assessments, weekly and unit assessments, interim assessments, Quick Checks, and foundational skills screeners.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Text Quality
Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.
Some anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level; however, some texts are low-quality. Anchor texts include Mentor Read-Alouds and Extended Read-Alouds, some of which are published works by well-known authors. While materials meet the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards, materials do not reflect the 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. The mentor read-aloud texts, shared readings, and poetry texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade level according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and a relationship to their associated student task. The complexity of anchor texts students engage with provides some opportunities for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year. Tasks related to the texts do not always show progression in complexity, and some tasks are based on comprehension strategies rather than the standards. Materials include Interactive Read-Alouds, Shared Readings, Reading Mini-Lessons with Mentor Read-Alouds or Extended Reads, and Small Group Readings.
Indicator 1A
Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. *This does not include decodables. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the expectations for Indicator 1a.
Some anchor texts are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level; however, some texts are low-quality. Anchor texts include Mentor Read-Alouds and Extended Read-Alouds, some of which are published works by well-known authors. Academic vocabulary within many mentor reads directly relates to the unit's topic. Some Mentor Read-Aloud and Extended Read-Aloud books contain vibrant illustrations and topics students can identify. At times, shared reading texts include rich vocabulary and provide opportunities for the teacher to engage students in the text. Anchor texts of low-quality include Mentor Read-Alouds that minimally relate to the topic and are not worthy of repeated readings for closer study. Additionally, low-quality anchor texts do not provide opportunities for students to grow their vocabulary on the unit's topic.
Some anchor texts are high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content-rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, the Mentor Read- Aloud, Filiberto in the Valley by Alex Branger is a fantasy about a male character named Carlitos of Hispanic descent and his pet domesticated mouse Filberto. Carlitos and Filberto explore the countryside on horseback and have adventures. This text is age-appropriate, and it contains rich language.
In Unit 3, Week 3, the Shared Reading, the Government at Work Texts for Close Reading contains the poem Words Like Freedom by Langston Hughes. The text recognizes the language of the African Diaspora as valid and essential to American literature and thought. This classic poem includes rich language.
In Unit 7, Week 2, the Mentor Read-Aloud Primary Sources by Margaret McNamara is an informational text about different types of primary sources used in research. It includes historical paintings and toys and archival photos of famous people, such as Martin Luther King Jr. It includes people from different backgrounds, such as African-American TV reporters, and an Asian girl interviewing her Dad. The text includes historical photos, rich content, and academic vocabulary.
In Unit 9, Week 1, the Short Read Goat and Bear in Business by Gare Thompson is a funny animal fantasy story based on a traditional folktale. It is a classic story and is age-appropriate.
In Unit 10, Week 3, the Extended Read-Aloud, Crazy Horse Memorial by Art Coulson, includes factual information, geographical references, and proper names. The text contains rich academic vocabulary. The illustrations are thought-provoking and vibrant.
Examples of anchor texts of low quality include, but are not limited to:
In Unit 3, Week 1, the Short Read “Can You Sew a Flag, Betsy Ross?” by Cindy Peattie has basic language lacking strong content.
In Unit 4, Week 1, the Short Read “The Huemel Egg” by Carlos Labbe lacks depth and does not provide enough context to help students understand why a black cat would be mistaken for a baby huemel (deer).
In Unit 7, Week 1, the Short Read “The Oregon Trail” (author not cited) is short in length. The text has basic language and lacks strong academic vocabulary.
In Unit 10, Week 1, the Short Read “Sand Sculpture” by Eleanor Hahn lacks opportunities for students to understand the different states of matter. It offers only vague descriptions of how sand sculptors can form large sculptures.
Indicator 1B
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level. *This does not include decodable. Those are identified in Criterion 3.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 1b.
While materials meet the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards, materials do not reflect the 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Rather, materials reflect a 36/64 balance of informational and literary texts across the year. Although each unit does not contain a variety of genres, the distribution of genres across the year include fantasy, realistic fiction, folktales, poems, and texts based on science and social studies concepts.
Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, there are two science texts, two fantasy texts, and a narrative poem. Examples of texts include Fillberto in the Valley by Alex Branger (literary fantasy) and Postcards from Alex by Antonio Martinez (literary fantasy).
In Unit 2, there are two folktales, two realistic fiction texts, and one narrative poem. Examples of texts include The Foolish Milkmaid by Aesop (literary folktale/short read) and The Daydreaming Sprinter by Charles R. Smith, Jr (realistic fiction).
In Unit 3, there are two social studies texts, two realistic fiction texts, and one narrative poem. Examples of texts include Getting a Message to General Washington by Susan Shafer (literary realistic fiction) and Words Like Freedom by Langston Hughes (literary narrative poem).
In Unit 4, there are four folktales and a narrative poem. Examples of texts include Read to Me by Jane Yolen (literary narrative poem) and Stone Soup by Winston Ramos (literary folktale).
In Unit 5, there are three biographies, one social studies text, and one free verse poem. Examples of texts include A Woman with Vision by Roman Karst (informational biography) and “Eletelephony” by Laura E. Richards (literary free verse poem).
In Unit 6, there are four folktales and a narrative poem. Examples of texts include Be Glad Your Nose Is On Your Face by Jack Prelutsky (literary narrative poem) and A Foxy Garden by Jeffrey B. Fuerst (literary folktale).
In Unit 7, there are three realistic fiction texts, one social studies text, and one narrative poem. Examples of texts include A Dinosaur Named SUE by Terri Patterson (literary realistic fiction) and Primary Sources by Margaret McNamara (informational social studies).
In Unit 8, there are two science texts, two opinion texts, a realistic fiction text, a fantasy text, and a free verse poem. Examples of texts include “Wind and Water Change Earth Bonita Springs Debates Its Future” by Tracy Owen (literary opinion) and Earth’s Changes by Louise Carroll (informational science).
In Unit 9, there are three literary texts, one fantasy text, one realistic fiction text, and a narrative poem. Examples of texts include Cherokee Art Fair by Traci Sorell (literary realistic fiction) and Goat and Bear in Business by Gare Thompson (literary fantasy).
In Unit 10, there are three informational texts and one literary narrative poem. Examples of texts include Crazy Horse Memorial by Art Coulson (informational science) and The Art of Origami by Sarah Brien (informational art).
Materials do not reflect a 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials for this grade level include 18 informational texts and 32 literary texts. The yearlong balance of informational and literary texts is 36% informational and 64% literary.
In Unit 1, students read a total of five texts. The unit contains two informational texts (40%) and three literary texts (60%).
In Unit 2, students read a total of five texts, all of which are literary (100%).
In Unit 3, students read a total of five texts. The unit contains two informational texts (40%) and three literary texts (60%).
In Unit 4, students read a total of five texts, all of which are literary (100%).
In Unit 5, students read a total of five texts. The unit contains four informational texts (80%) and one literary text (20%).
In Unit 6, students listen to a total of five texts, all of which are literary (100%).
In Unit 7, students read a total of five texts. The unit contains two informational texts (40%) and three literary texts (60%).
In Unit 8, students read a total of five texts. The unit contains two informational texts (40%) and three literary texts (60%).
In Unit 9, students listen to a total of five texts. The unit contains two informational texts (40%) and three literary texts (60%).
In Unit 10, students listen to a total of five texts. The unit contains four informational texts (80%) and one literary text (20%).
Indicator 1C
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1c.
The mentor read-aloud texts and some shared readings and poetry texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade level according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and a relationship to their associated student task. Across the year, anchor texts range from 520L to 740L. The distribution of texts is varied and includes eight accessible texts, twenty-five moderate texts, fourteen complex texts, one very complex text, and two highly complex texts. The Program Support Guide includes rationales for educational purposes and placement in the grade level. Students engage in tasks, such as participating in discussions with partners and using text evidence from illustrations and text features to answer questions. Students engage in shared and interactive writings about texts and unit summaries called “blueprints,” to synthesize unit information.
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, students read the anchor text, Postcards for Alex by Antonio Martinez (580L). The qualitative complexity rating is moderate because it is an epistolary story (a story told through letters) that may be unfamiliar to some readers. The text also includes some domain-specific terms, such as burrow, desert, and rain forest, which are either defined in context or supported with art. The text includes geographical references to Chile and animals, such as the llama, flea, and armadillo. Students describe the text's overall structure and use information from the illustrations and words to demonstrate their understanding of story structure.
In Unit 3, Week 1, students read the mentor text, Smoke Jumpers by Matt Bander (650L). The qualitative complexity is moderate as the text contains descriptive sentences about events and ideas with a clear and explicit connection. The information is detailed, but the topic is familiar. For three days, students distinguish between important and unimportant information in the text, use context clues to learn vocabulary, and describe connections between events.
In Unit 8, Week 3, students read the mentor text, “Bonita Springs Debates Its Future” by Tracy Owen (550L). The qualitative complexity is high as it contains many complex and compound sentences, sophisticated language, facts, quotes, and domain-specific words—of which only a few are defined within the text. The text is presented in the context of a newspaper article. For four days, students build knowledge using metacognitive and fix-up strategies, determine the purpose of the text, determine the meaning of multiple-meaning words, and describe how the author’s reasons support specific points in the text.
Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Week 3, students listen to and read the mentor text, Robots Go to School by Kathy Kafer (680L). The text has a medium qualitative complexity rating. The rationale for educational placement states that robots can solve many problems for us. Robots in school are one example of how technology can help us solve problems. This relates to the unit topic, “Solving Problems Through Technology.”
In Unit 6, Week 3, students read the anchor text, Why the Sky is Far Away by Eileen Robinson (740L). The text has a high qualitative complexity rating. The rationale for the educational placement states that the tale from West African culture discourages wastefulness– a theme of the unit (conservation).
In Unit 8, Week 1, students read Tornado by Ben Chatham (650L). The text has a moderate qualitative complexity rating. The rationale for the educational placement states that tornadoes are unpredictable and deadly. People must react quickly to stay safe. This passage explains how to deal with a tornado.
In Unit 10, Week 3, students read Crazy Horse Memorial by Art Coulson (690L). The text has a high qualitative complexity rating. The rationale for the educational placement states this text is included because it provides historical information about Crazy Horse and supports the unit topic by revealing the physical processes used to create a memorial on a mountain. The description of the sculpting processes teaches readers about the ways solids can be manipulated.
The Text Overview provides accurate information relating to the texts’ qualitative features for the grade level as determined by the rubrics included in the EdReports evidence guides. The Lexiles available on Metametrics indicate an appropriate quantitative level of complexity for Grade 2.
Indicator 1D
Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the expectations of Indicator 1d.
The complexity of anchor texts students engage with provides some opportunities for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year. Across the school year, Lexile levels range from 520L–660L. Qualitatively, most texts are of moderate complexity with some texts falling within the medium and high ranges. Tasks related to the texts do not always show progression in complexity, and some tasks are based on comprehension strategies rather than the Standards. Materials provide the same scaffolds for texts regardless of complexity. Students reread complex texts multiple times for different instructional purposes and analysis.
The complexity of anchor texts students read provides minimal opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, the texts range in quantitative complexity from 520L–650L. In Week 2, Day 2, students listen to and read “Our Government Laws” by Nya Brown (520L); the qualitative and associated task complexities are moderately complex. The teacher reads aloud the title and paragraphs 1–2 while looking for text evidence to identify the selection's main idea. During Guided Practice, students work with partners to identify the main focus of each section and paragraph. Students underline the text evidence that answers the question in the subheading. In the Apply Understanding section, during the independent time, students review an informational text they are reading and use a self-stick note to mark one example of text evidence they found that helps them understand the main focus.
In Unit 7, the texts range in quantitative complexity from 550L–730L. In Week 3, Day 2, students read paragraphs 1–5 of “A Dinosaur Named SUE” by Terri Patterson (570L); the qualitative and associated task complexities are moderate. The teacher asks students to read and annotate the text to support comprehension. The teacher reminds students to reference the anchor charts. During Share and Reflect, students address the following questions with a partner: “What strategies did you use as you read? How did they help you? What new knowledge did you gain from reading ‘A Dinosaur Named SUE’? What kinds of mental images did you have when reading the text? How did this selection change or expand your thinking about the essential question: ‘How does understanding the past shape the future?’” Then students participate in Review Fix-Up Strategies: Read Out Loud to Support Comprehension. For independent work, students read paragraphs 6–10 to finish the text. The teacher reminds students to apply strategies and annotate the text to support comprehension.
In Unit 10, the texts range in quantitative complexity from 530L–690L. In Week 2, Day 1, students read paragraphs 1–2 of “The Art of Origami” by Sarah Brien (530L); the text is moderately complex and the associated task has an accessible complexity rating. Students annotate the text to support their comprehension. If students cannot read the text independently, the teacher can select an alternate approach from Ways to Scaffold the First Reading. During Share and Reflect, students address the following questions: “What strategies did you use as you read? How did they help you? What new knowledge did you gain about making origami? How did this selection change or expand your thinking about the Essential Question: ‘How can matter change?’ How did the numbered photographs help you to understand each step of making origami?” During Apply Understanding for two minutes, students independently read paragraphs 3–8 to finish the text. The teacher directs students to continue applying strategies and annotate the text to support comprehension.
As texts become more complex, some scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (i.e., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, for the first read of “The Foolish Milkmaid” a fable by Aesop, materials include the following student supports: previewing the text, building vocabulary with the Define/Example/Ask Routine, using Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, modeling, listening to the interactive e-book, dictating for the student, and sharing orally. In Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, if students are English Language Learners who need support with vocabulary and language demands, then the teacher could: read the text to the students, conduct a before-reading picture walk to introduce vocabulary and concepts, stop after meaningful chunks to define unfamiliar words, and paraphrase difficult sentences. If students are readers who decode with little comprehension, then the teacher could read the text with students and stop after meaningful chunks to ask who, what, when, where, how questions, and work with students to find answers in the text. If students need some support to read unfamiliar texts with comprehension, then the teacher could have students read with a partner. The partners should read aloud meaningful chunks and ask each other who, what, when, where, and how questions about the characters and events.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, for the first read of “A Foxy Garden” by Jeffrey B. Fuerst, materials include the following student supports: previewing the text, building vocabulary with the Define/Example/Ask Routine, using Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, reminding students to annotate the text, sharing and reflecting within small groups, reading the text with a partner, sharing ideas orally, and completing vocabulary activities with a partner. In Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, if students are English Language Learners who need support with vocabulary and language demands, then the teacher could: read the text to the students, conduct a before-reading picture walk to introduce vocabulary and concepts, stop after meaningful chunks to define unfamiliar words, and paraphrase difficult sentences. If students are readers who decode with little comprehension, then the teacher could read the text with students and stop after meaningful chunks to ask who, what, when, where, how questions, and work with students to find answers in the text. If students need some support to read unfamiliar texts with comprehension, then the teacher could have students read with a partner. The partners should read aloud meaningful chunks and ask each other who, what, when, where, and how questions about the text to identify key details.
In Unit 9, Week 3, Day 1, for the first read of “Cherokee Art Fair” by Traci Sorell, materials include the following student supports: previewing the text, building vocabulary with the Define/Example/Ask Routine, using Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, modeling asking a question before reading, reminding students to use other strategies to help understanding (rereading to clarify), sharing ideas orally with a partner, listening to the interactive e-book, dictating for the student, and completing Quick Check A or B. In Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, if students are English Language Learners who need support with vocabulary and language demands, then the teacher could: read the text to the students, conduct a before-reading picture walk to introduce vocabulary and concepts, stop after meaningful chunks to define unfamiliar words, and paraphrase difficult sentences. If students are readers who decode with little comprehension, then the teacher could read the text with students and stop after meaningful chunks to ask who, what, when, where, how questions, and work with students to find answers in the text. If students need some support to read unfamiliar texts with comprehension, then the teacher could have students read with a partner. The partners should read aloud meaningful chunks and ask each other who, what, when, where, and how questions about the characters and events.
Indicator 1E
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1e.
Materials provide three pacing options: 150-minute, 120-minute, or a 90-minute literacy block. The Reading Foundations, Reading to Build Knowledge and Vocabulary, Read-Aloud, and Writing and Grammar supports include teacher guidance on dividing the time. Materials include Interactive Read-Alouds, Shared Readings, Reading Mini-Lessons with Mentor Read-Alouds or Extended Reads, and Small Group Readings. Each unit contains texts related to the unit topic in shared readings, vocabulary mini-lessons, and small group instruction. Three week units include five to seven shared readings, two extended reading texts, two Mentor Read-Alouds, decodables, leveled readers to use within small group instruction, and two reader’s theater texts.
Materials include a comprehensive range of materials to support a robust independent reading program, including reading logs, anchor charts, at-home monitoring, classroom design, and suggestions. In addition, materials provide daily guidance and structures to support teachers with incorporating independent reading into the literacy block. The Managing an Independent Reading Program resource includes teacher guidance on supporting students in reading. Guidance encourages students to develop a daily at-home reading practice for a minimum of twenty minutes.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in reading a variety of texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students read or listen to five texts: two short reads, two Extended Reads, and a poem. All of the texts in this unit are literary texts.
In Unit 3, students read or listen to five texts: two short reads, two Extended Reads, and a poem. The unit contains two informational social studies texts, two realistic fiction texts, and one narrative poem.
In Unit 4, students read or listen to five texts: two short reads, two Extended Reads, and a poem. All of the texts are literary texts, four of which are folktales and one of which is a narrative poem.
In Unit 7, students read or listen to five texts: two short reads, two Extended Reads, and a poem. The unit contains two realistic fiction texts, one narrative nonfiction text, and one narrative poem.
Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and supports for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, students engage in a volume of reading:
In Unit 1, Week 1, students read the Short Reads, “Emperor Penguin Habitat” by Thea Feldman and “Postcards from Alex by Antonio Martinez,
In Unit 1, Week 2, students read the Extended Read “Habitat Around the World” by Thea Feldman.
In Unit 1, Week 3, students read the the Extended Read “Filberto in the Valley” by Alex Brangor.
In Unit 2, students engage in a volume of reading:
In Unit 2, Week 1, students read the Short Reads, “The Foolish Mermaid” by Aesop and “The Daydreaming Sprinter” by Charles R. Smith, Jr.
In Unit 2, Week 2, students read the Extended Read “Yeh-Shen”a Chinese folktale retold by Yuanyuan Gu.
In Unit 2, In Week 3, students read the Extended Read, “Great Girls’ Contest” by Mattie Harper.
In Unit 10, students engage in a volume of reading:
In Unit 10, Week 1, students read the Short Reads, “The Art of Origami” by Sarah Brien and “Sand Sculpture” by Eleanor Hahn.
In Unit 10, Week 2, students read the Extended Read “Matter Changes in Many Ways” by Jay Brewster.
In Unit 10, Week 3, students read the Extended Read “Crazy Horse Memorial” by Art Coulson.
The Additional Resources section includes a document titled Managing an Independent Reading Program. This document lists multiple times that students can independently read during the daily reading block and also mentions the Managing Your Independent Reading Program document.
There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
During independent reading, students keep reading logs and reading response journals. Teachers can conference regularly with individual students to monitor their progress.
The mini-lesson component of the Managing Your Independent Reading Program document includes guidance on the teacher’s role when selecting a topic based on their observation of student needs, interests, and curriculum goals. The teacher provides mini-lessons on management, literary works, and effective reading strategies using examples from real texts.
The Additional Resources section includes a document titled Managing an Independent Reading Program. This document lists multiple times that students can independently read during the daily reading block and also mentions the Managing Your Independent Reading Program document.
Every unit contains a Comprehensive Literacy Planner that gives an overview of all mini-lessons for the week. This document includes teacher guidance on providing students with time for independent reading each day and refers the teacher to the Unit Foldout for more information.
Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Materials include standards-aligned, text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments that support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied and require students to engage with the text directly. Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in text-based discussions with partners, with Speaking and Listening Protocols embedded in the program and also found in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank, located in the Additional Materials section. Students participate in Turn, Talk, and Listen partner activities related to the text, paraphrase partner’s answers, and share their ideas with the class. On-demand writing opportunities occur as students respond to text-based prompts and complete short, focused projects, such as writing an opinion piece about their favorite character from the text. Materials include opportunities for students to engage in process writing during every unit and contain various opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres and types of writing by the standards. Students have multiple opportunities to learn, practice, and apply evidence-based writing. Materials provide daily explicit grammar and usage instruction and opportunities for student practice and application of all grade-level grammar and usage standards. Additionally, materials include a year-long vocabulary development plan, which lists all Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary organized by Unit and Weeks. The plan includes a key that outlines which vocabulary words are explicitly taught in the unit and which week the words repeat in.
Indicator 1F
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1f.
Materials include standards-aligned, text-specific and text-dependent questions, tasks, and assignments that support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied and require students to engage with the text directly. Lessons contain multiple questions that include the depth of knowledge necessary to answer the questions and the correct answer, so teachers are supported in planning and implementing the questions and tasks. The Teacher’s Resource System provides text-based questions to ask students and anchor charts to model and support student learning. Materials frequently provide sentence frames, and student tasks include options to draw or speak.
Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the text being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 5, students reread paragraph 1 of Emperor Penguin Habitat by Laura Charleston and paragraph 6 of Habitats Around the World by Thea Feldman and answer the following text-specific questions: “How is Antarctica different from the rainforest? Underline specific evidence from the texts to support your answer.” Materials include a possible student response in the Teacher’s Resource Guide.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 2, after rereading paragraph one from “Stone Soup” by Winston Ramos, students discuss the following text-specific question: “Why does the author use the phrases ‘real treat’ and ‘you will see’ in paragraph 6? How does pulling a pot from his coat ‘like a magician’ add meaning to the story?”
In Unit 7, Week 3, Day 2, during the Extended Read Mini-Lesson, students read “A Dinosaur Named SUE” by Terri Patterson. Students engage in a Constructive Conversation with a peer group, as the teacher displays the following text-specific activity: “Reread the August 11th journal entry. Then review the map on page 20. Explain how the map supports the author’s writing. Cite specific examples from the map and words in the text to support your answer.” During the Apply Understanding portion of the lesson, students independently complete a similar text-based task during which they write 1–2 paragraphs using complete sentences.
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, the Teacher’s Resource Guide prompts teachers to read aloud paragraphs 1–2 of The Foolish Milkmaid by Aesop and model how to identify key details to determine the story’s central message. In the Guided Practice section, teachers reread paragraphs 3–4 and pose text-dependent questions to guide students’ thinking as they identify additional details related to the story's central message.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 4, students reread the first two paragraphs of “Water’s Awesome Wonder” by Sarah Brien and work in small peer groups to answer the following text-specific question: “What is the author’s main purpose for writing about the Grand Canyon? How do you know?” Materials include a possible student response. The Reinforce and Reaffirm the Strategy section of the lesson provides teachers with If/Then strategies to support students.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 4, students complete the following task: “Reread paragraph 1 of ‘Sand Sculpture.’ How is a sand sculpture different from something you might quickly create with a pail and shovel at the beach? What key details does the author provide in this paragraph to help you identify the difference?” Materials include a Possible Response section in the margin to support the teacher with implementing the task.
Indicator 1G
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1g.
Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in text-based discussions with partners. The Speaking and Listening Protocols are embedded in the program and can also be found in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank, located in the Additional Materials section. The Foundations and Routines Unit introduces the protocols and provides many opportunities to practice to solidify students’ understanding of the steps in each protocol. Protocols are introduced, practiced, and applied by Unit and students engage in more complex protocols in later units. Think-Speak-Listen tools for language structures are also provided to help students support their ideas with reasons, evidence, and examples. The Teacher Resource System includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers, including extensive information about discussion protocols and constructive conversations.
Materials include protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Additional Resources section includes a Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank and a Constructive Conversation protocol document. This document defines the protocols and provides information to understand the how and why of the protocol. The Protocol Complexity Table provides a visual overview showing the Protocol use in Each Unit and how protocol complexity build across the year.
Materials also include Think-Speak-Listen protocols that go along with the Constructive Conversation materials. The protocols in the lesson plan contain sentence stems designed to support student conversation during instruction.
The Turn and Talk Protocol is explicitly taught and used frequently throughout the materials, and the instructions are limited to, “Ask partners to share responses to the Turn and Talk questions. Remind them to take turns and listen carefully when their partner is speaking.” The teacher provides the topic or questions to the students.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 4, students engage in a Constructive Conversation. Partners look for clues and work together to create an answer to the question. The teacher observes their conversations to determine the level of support they may need. Students will use the foundational Turn and Talk protocol described in the protocol continuum table located in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, students engage in the extended read, A Foxy Garden by Jeffrey B. Fuerst. Students read paragraphs 1–3 and make connections between the text and personal experiences. Students discuss their answers in a small group. Students will use the foundational Turn and Talk protocol described in the protocol continuum table located in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank.
In Unit 9, Week 2, Day 3, students use the Constructive Conversation protocol to discuss the text From Pine Tree to Pizza Box by Amy and Richard Hutchings. The teacher places students into groups of three to four students, and they discuss the prompt, “Reread paragraphs 1 and 2 and examine the diagram on page 12. How does the diagram contribute to your understanding of trees as an important resource? Use text evidence to support your ideas.” Students will use the foundational Turn and Talk protocol described in the protocol continuum table located in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank.
Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Additional Resources section includes a Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank, a Constructive Conversation protocol document, and the Foundations and Routines resource guide includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional supports for teachers.
In the Teacher Resource material, under the Additional Materials section for each unit, materials include a document that provides general teacher guidance on “Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations.” This guidance is the same throughout all units across the year.
For example, the resource states, “Teachers and students can better understand how to improve conversations with the tools that accompany the Benchmark Advance program. The first tool, the ‘Conversation Blueprint,’ is a visual guide to help teachers scaffold students’ conversations. This tool shows the structure of the two main types of conversations that should happen during lessons. The tools especially designed for students are the Think-Speak-Listen Bookmarks…” These tools offer sentence systems for various skills within a conversation.”
The Conversational Blueprint document includes a supporting document that fits the description at the end of the Constructive Conversation guidance.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 3, students read the text, Smoke Jumpers by Matt Bander. The teacher reads out loud paragraphs 1 - 2 as students follow along. The teacher poses the question to students, “How do smoke jumpers and their tools get to a fire?” The teacher uses the words first, next, then, last and finally to support student learning.
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 2, students read the text, Wind and Water Change Earth by Tracy Owen. The teacher facilitates a Constructive Conversation with the students. Guidance for the protocol reminds teachers to have students annotate the text, ask clarifying questions, and build on each other’s ideas. The teacher circulates and provides feedback to students and checks to ensure they have used text evidence. The Teacher’s Resource System includes a possible student response to aid teachers. To provide additional support or extend the experience, the guidance directs the teacher to reference the Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy.
In Unit 10, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher engages the students in small group Constructive Conversations during the extended read, Sand Sculpture by Eleanor Hahn. Students answer the text-based question, “How does the caption on page 6 provide additional information about sand sculptures?” The left margin of the lesson plan includes a sample response to aid the teacher. Students will use the foundational Turn and Talk protocol described in the protocol continuum table located in the Speaking and Listening Protocols Bank.
Indicator 1H
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading (or read aloud) and researching (shared projects) with relevant follow-up questions and support.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1h.
Throughout the year, students typically have the opportunity to engage in speaking and listening daily, including opportunities to speak in whole group, partner, and small group settings. In some units, students engage in whole group presentations. These opportunities include speaker and audience expectations in the form of teacher directions and anchor charts. The materials provide partner sharing and small group discussion opportunities during the majority of speaking and listening tasks. Students complete a Knowledge Blueprint graphic organizer during the unit and hold a class discussion on what they learned at the end of the unit; the Knowledge Blueprint is expanded upon throughout the unit. Materials include opportunities to implement agreed upon rules for discussions, partner and small group work, and to guide students on answering questions about a speaker. While the materials do provide opportunities for students to address all of the Speaking and Listening standards, some of the activities are optional or at the discretion of the teacher.
Students have many opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., gaining the floor in respectful ways, listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under discussion). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher and students co-create an anchor chart that build students’ listening habits. This chart is reviewed throughout various lessons across the year.
Create audio recordings of stories or poems; add drawings or other visual displays to stories or recounts of experiences when appropriate to clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Un Unit 7, Week 3, Day 5, students are working on the final draft of their narrative nonfiction letters. The materials indicate, “You may wish to have students create audio recordings of their narratives or add drawings or other visual displays.” While teachers have the option to have students create audio recordings or include drawings, it is not a requirement in the core materials.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 5, students are working on the final draft of their research project. The materials indicate, “You may wish to have students create audio recordings of their research report or add drawings or other visual displays to clarify their ideas, thoughts, and feelings.” While teachers have the option to have students create audio recordings or include drawings, it is not a requirement in the core materials.
In the Reader’s Theater Handbook, Unit 7, Lesson 1, Discuss Staging, the materials suggest that the teache may want to audio or video record the performance: “Also consider whether to video- or audiotape the performance to post on a sharing website or add to students’ portfolios.” While teachers have the option to have students create audio recordings, it is not a requirement in the core materials.
Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Build on others' talk in conversations by linking their comments to the remarks of others. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher presents the Essential Question, “What can we learn when we face challenges?” Students write or draw their initial responses to the question and discuss ideas as a class. After reviewing the captions on the pictures of the opening page of text, students turn and talk and share their connections to the images. The teacher reminds students to take turns and listen carefully when their partner is speaking. The lesson plan provides teacher guidance for students to build up each other’s comments.
In Unit 9, Week 2, Day 3, the teacher reviews prior learning about how irregular verbs change their spelling and their pronunciation to form the past tense. Students will build on this knowledge to identify and discuss irregular past tense verbs in the text “From Pine Trees to Pizza Box” by Amy and Rachel Hutchings. The teacher models identifying the irregular past tense verbs in the text. Students work in pairs to discuss sentences and identify the verbs, the irregular past tense verbs, and why they are irregular by describing their present tense forms. Students should take turns speaking and build on each other’s comments. After concluding the partner practice, the class reviews when to use irregular past tense verbs in sentences. The teacher asks students to reflect on what they have learned about the irregular past tense verbs and invites several students to explain how they identify irregular past tense verbs.
Ask for clarification and further explanation as needed about the topics and texts under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 2, Units 7-8: Step 5, the materials direct the teacher to say to students, “Listeners: After the presentation, ask questions to clarify anything you do not understand. As you discuss the research report, everyone should follow agreed-upon rules for discussion: gain the floor in a respectful way, listen carefully to others, and talk one at a time.”
Recount or describe key ideas or details from a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 5, after listening to the poem “The Bat” by Theodore Roethke, the teacher models identifying the features and structure of the poem. The class constructs a Features of Poetry Anchor Chart. Students work with partners to read the poem on their own and discuss the poetic features they find and the mood these features help create. As a class, students discuss the poetic features and the mood created by the features.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, after listening to “The Foolish Milkmaid” by Aesop, students use the Central Message Chart to record key details of the text and what they have learned. The teacher rereads the story details. Afterwards, students form partner groups and infer a central message based on the story details. As a group, students generate a possible central message and discuss how the details support the central message.
Ask and answer questions about what a speaker says in order to clarify comprehension, gather additional information, or deepen understanding of a topic or issue. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher introduces words from “The Heumel Egg” retold by Carlos Labbe using the Define/Example/Ask Routine. Students make connections to the text. Students use given questions to have a conversation about the story. Questions include: “Can you think of another text to text question? What is it? Can you think of another personal connection? What is it? What new information or ideas did you learn from the story?” Students discuss as a class.
Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 2, Unit 4, Step 5, the materials direct teacher to say to students, “It is time for you to work on Step 5 in your e-notebooks. As you tell your story, you must include relevant, descriptive details you planned for and created in steps 3 and 4 of this project. Relevant details include what your character looks like, where they live, and what happens to them. Remember to speak in complete sentences and to say each word clearly so others can understand you. Also, be prepared to answer questions others may have about your topic. Some classmates may need more clarification or explanation about parts of your folktale.”
Indicator 1I
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process, grade-appropriate writing (e.g., grade-appropriate revision and editing) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1i.
As a part of daily instruction, students utilize the My Reading and Writing notebook for text-based, on-demand writing opportunities. Additional on-demand writing opportunities occur as students respond to text-based prompts and complete short, focused projects, such as writing an opinion piece about their favorite character from the text. Materials include opportunities for students to engage in process writing during every unit. Students learn to pre-write, draft, revise, edit and proofread, and publish or present. During the writing portion of the lesson, students complete process writing tasks spanning different genres and content, with writing tasks lasting from five days to fifteen days. Materials include some digital resources and opportunities for students to develop their final drafts.
Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 2, students gather facts and details to answer a text-based prompt, “Today, you are going to gather facts and details from a print source to use in your informative/explanatory essay.” Students review the text “Habitats Around the World” to complete a chart of facts and details that they may include in their essay.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 2, students use their notebooks or e-notebooks to write their answer to Question 1 on page 26 of The Stone Garden by Jeffrey B. Fuerst Students’ responses should contain complete sentences and be 1–2 paragraphs in length.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 2, students engage in a research project. The teacher reminds students they have been looking at a research report during the week. The teacher says that she will model first in gathering facts and information, and then students will complete the task. The teacher gives students a model that includes, Topic, sources, facts, quotes, and important words. There is guidance on teacher feedback that teachers should provide students with based on what they need.
Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Weeks 1–3, students write an informative/explanatory essay. In Week 1, students read a mentor text, recall information from experiences, gather information from sources, and organize. In Week 2, students introduce their topic, develop their topic with specific details, use linking words and phrases to connect ideas, and draft a concluding statement. In Week 3, students revise to improve sentence fluency, revise to include domain-specific vocabulary, edit for correct use of verbs, edit to check capitalization, punctuation, and spelling, and publish.
In Unit 6, Weeks 1–3, students write a narrative. In Week 1, students analyze a mentor narrative text, brainstorm, evaluate their ideas, plan, and organize their narrative fiction. In Week 2, students develop strong characters, draft, and provide closure. In Week 3, students revise their writing for use of temporal words and add sensory details, and edit for complete, compound sentences, correct use of adjectives and adverbs, and correct spelling. Then students add a title to their narrative and publish their work.
In Unit 8, Weeks 1–3, students write a research report. In Week 1, students read a mentor text, gather information from sources, take notes from an illustration or photograph, plan, and organize their research report. In Week 2, students introduce their topic, develop their topic with specific facts and details, use linking words and phrases, and draft a conclusion. In Week 3, students revise their writing to improve sentence fluency and include domain-specific vocabulary, and edit for formal use of English and correct spelling. Afterwards, students publish and share their writing.
Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Writer’s Universe contains various digital lessons that include videos and interactive graphic organizers that walk students through each step of the writing process. The digital resources include space for students to type their drafts and submit their work to the teacher. Afterward, the teacher unlocks the next step of the writing practice. Materials also include a mentor text and instruction and interactive practice to support writing related to that genre—opinion about a topic, opinion about a text, personal narrative, fable, informative about Science, and informative about Social Studies.
In Unit 7, on pages 49–50 of the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, students research a historical person or event. Students use digital resources to gather both primary and secondary sources.
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 5, students type their poems on a computer, using the decisions they made based on their answers to the three guiding questions. They include an illustration or image on the same page as their poem. Guidance suggests the teacher allow students to create audio recordings of their acrostic poems.
Indicator 1J
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing (year-long) that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1j.
Materials contain various opportunities for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres and types of writing by the standards. Materials provide opportunities for students to use both print and video sources in multiple units and include links to online material for teachers to use as they see fit to support student writing. Support includes sentence frames that the teacher can use to support students' writing.
Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Different genres/modes/types of writing are not evenly distributed throughout the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Percentage or number of opportunities for opinion writing:
Students have 6 out of 30 opportunities to learn, practice, and apply opinion writing across the school year.
In Unit 1, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 2, there are three opportunities for opinion writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Unit 3, there are no opportunities for opinion writing
In Unit 4, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 5, there are three opportunities for opinion writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are opinion in nature.
In Unit 6, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 7, there are no opportunities for opinion writing
In Unit 8, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 9, there are no opportunities for opinion writing.
In Unit 10, there are no opportunities for opinion writing
Percentage or number of opportunities for informative/explanatory writing:
Students have out 9 of 30 opportunities to learn, practice, and apply informative/explanatory writing across the school year.
In Unit 1, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 2, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 3, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 4, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 5, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 6, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 7, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 8, there are three opportunities for informative/explanatory writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are informative/explanatory in nature.
In Unit 9, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
In Unit 10, there are no opportunities for informative/explanatory writing.
Percentage or number of opportunities for narrative writing:
Students have out 9 of 30 opportunities to learn, practice, and apply narrative writing across the school year.
In Unit 1, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 2, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 3, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 4, there are three opportunities for narrative writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are narrative in nature.
In Unit 5, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 6, there are three opportunities for narrative writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are narrative in nature.
In Unit 7, there are three opportunities for narrative writing. All writing opportunities for this unit are narrative in nature.
In Unit 8, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 9, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
In Unit 10, there are no opportunities for narrative writing.
Explicit instruction in opinion writing:
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher shows and reads Opening Paragraph examples. The teacher models how to improve the introduction.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher displays the introductory paragraph. The teacher models how to add an opinion statement.
Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher reads the writing prompt and reads the sample opening paragraph. The teacher explains why it is a strong introduction.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher displays the Model Opening Paragraph and models thinking aloud about why the paragraph is cohesive.
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher explains the elements of cohesive body paragraphs. The teacher shows a planning chart from Week 1. The teacher shows and reads the modeling text and models how to write the first body paragraph.
Explicit instruction in narrative writing:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher displays the Mentor Diary Entry Planning Guide. The teacher models thinking aloud using details from the chart to complete the first row of the chart.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 4, the teacher reminds students that the story's conclusion should reveal the theme, solve the problem, and show how the character changed. The teacher shows and reads aloud the modeling text. The teacher explains how they wrote the ending to provide closure.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 3, the teacher displays and reads aloud the middle paragraphs of their letter. The teacher explains how they organized that part of the letter.
Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year, although the distribution is not even. Examples include, but are not limited to:
Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing. For example:
Write opinion pieces in which they introduce the topic or name the book they are writing about, state an opinion, supply a reason for the opinion, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, students form an opinion statement about the main character in “The Foolish Milkmaid.”,
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 3, students use the Mentor Opinion Essay and a sample two-column chart of opinion and reasons to help them as they develop their reasons that support their opinion. Students add sentences stating reasons that support their opinion.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 4, students write concluding sentences for their opinion writing piece.
Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. For example:
Write informative/explanatory texts in which they name a topic, supply some facts about the topic, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 1, students write an informative/explanatory essay describing how emperor penguins survive Antarctica’s harsh winters. Students plan their own informative/explanatory essays.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, students write introductory paragraphs for their opinion writing prompt in which they tell what their essay is about.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, students study a model opening paragraph about the President of the United States, then plan and write their own introductory paragraph about the unit topic of government.
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 4, students write conclusions for their research reports.
Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. For example:
Write narratives in which they recount two or more appropriately sequenced events, include some details regarding what happened, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide some sense of closure.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 3, students write a diary entry from the point of view of a villager in the story Stone Soup. Students include details such as events, thoughts, and feelings of villagers from the story Stone Soup into their diary entries.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 4, students write a conclusion for their narrative writing piece.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 3, students write the body of their narrative nonfiction letter. Students work on writing about events in the order they occur and should include the bigger moment and the smaller moments.
Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). For example:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, students write an informative/explanatory essay using the mentor essay on grasslands as a model. Students choose what facts and focus their informative/explanatory essay about grasslands will include.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 3, students work on a 15-day informative/explanatory writing task. This lesson guides students to choose a source to find information for their essays. The sources suggested are the Texts for Close Reading, a Leveled Text from Unit 3, or books from the classroom or school library.
In Unit 6, Week, students study Stone Soup as a mentor text and write their own narrative fictional piece. Students note the setting, characters, and problem in Stone Soup and notice how the author develops the theme.
In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 1, students create a multimedia presentation. Students use the mentor multimedia presentation “My First Trip to Bear Lake” as a model and note the key features of a strong presentation.
Indicator 1K
Materials include regular opportunities for evidence-based writing to support recall of information, opinions with reasons, and relevant information appropriate for the grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the expectations of Indicator 1k.
The instructional materials for Benchmark Grade 2 include frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply evidence-based writing. Students use their "Texts for Close Reading" book related to each unit to complete writing aligned to the Reading mini-lessons. Each week students have multiple text-dependent questions to answer, and they write 1-2 paragraph responses. Students have writing opportunities that focus on recalling information from reading closely and working with texts and sources. Using the Benchmark Writer’s Universe, students use digital materials to create writing pieces in each genre throughout the year.
Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher models how to look for relevant facts and details in the print source, “Emperor Penguin Habitat.”
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 3, after reading “The Foolish Milkmaid,” the teacher models using details in the text and from the notes to form an opinion and write their opinion.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 2, after reading “Stone Soup,” the teacher models retelling events sequentially in diary entries.
Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 2, students do a close reading of The Stone Garden and write in response to the following question: Reread paragraphs 5–7. How is the visitor’s point of view different from the townspeople’s? Cite specific evidence to support your answer.
In Unit 7, Week 1 students read the texts The Oregon Trail and Ranch Flyer. In the Texts for Close Reading book, after reading the two texts, students are given the following task: “If you could read more from one of the two writers, which one would you prefer? Why? Use evidence from the text, including specific elements of the writing style that you liked, to support your choice.”
In Unit 9, Week 2 students continue working on their culminating task for the unit, which is to create an advertisement for a good. On Day 5, students complete the task of identifying the resources needed. The task states, “Revisit the text you read this week. Think about how resources are used to make boxes. Then think about the product you picked to sell in your business and how it is made. What resources will you need to produce your product or good? Where will you get the resources you need?”
Indicator 1L
Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1l.
Grade 2 materials provide explicit instruction for all grade-level grammar and conventions standards. The materials include embedded, authentic opportunities for students to apply skills to writing. Grammar and usage are taught and practiced both in explicit, isolated lessons and in the context of read alouds, shared and independent writing, and dictation exercises. Students have opportunities to work with the whole group, with partners, as well as independently. Students engage in authentic independent writing activities daily. During each unit, a piece of independent writing is taken through the steps of the writing process. Explicit opportunities for application in context occur primarily during the editing phase of the writing process.
Materials include explicit instruction of all grammar and conventions standards for the grade level. For example:
Use collective nouns (e.g., group).
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher explains that collective nouns are words for groups of people, animals, or things. The teacher models with a chart, and students make a list of collective nouns to add to the chart, e.g., army, herd, hive, litter, pack, series, kit, bunch, crowd, team, band, school, pair, class, family, set. The teacher models revising an example draft. Partners work together to revise sentences using collective nouns and then share out with the class.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher tells students that collective nouns refer to a group of people, animals, places, things, or ideas as a single unit. The teacher displays and reads aloud a paragraph from the day’s short read and discusses the collective noun family used in the paragraph. The teacher displays and reads another paragraph from the same text, and students identify the collective nouns series, kit, and bunch. Students reflect on how to use collective nouns and share examples of collective nouns.
Form and use frequently occurring irregular plural nouns (e.g., feet, children, teeth, mice, fish).
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher uses letter cards and Elkonin boxes to build irregular plural nouns from singular nouns, such as woman/women, leaf/leaves.
In Unit 10, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that irregular plural nouns do not form the plural by adding -s or -es. The teacher uses a paragraph from “Crazy Horse Memorial” and models identifying the irregular plural nouns. The teacher demonstrates and gives examples of how irregular plural nouns form their plurals: one sheep/many sheep; one leaf/many leaves. Student partners identify the irregular plural noun in a sentence and explain the difference between regular and irregular plural nouns.
Use reflexive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves).
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 4, students explore pronouns and reflexive pronouns when writing from a first-person point of view. The teacher displays and reads aloud a list of pronouns and reflexive pronouns and creates an anchor chart to summarize pronoun and reflexive pronoun usage. The teacher models identifying the reflexive pronoun in the mentor text. Student partners identify the pronouns and reflexive pronouns in the final paragraph of the mentor text and use them in sentences. During independent writing time, students include at least one reflexive pronoun.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher displays and reads a list of pronouns and reflexive pronouns. Pronouns: I, me, you, she, her, he, him, it, we, they, them, us, you; Reflexive pronouns: myself, yourself, herself, himself, itself, ourselves, themselves, yourselves. The teacher creates an anchor chart describing when to use pronouns and reflexive pronouns. The teacher uses a sentence containing a reflexive pronoun and models how to identify it. Partners identify pronouns and reflexive pronouns in the final paragraph of the mentor text and use them in a new sentence and then share with the class.
Form and use the past tense of frequently occurring irregular verbs (e.g., sat, hid, told).
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher reviews the definition of past tense verbs and irregular verbs. The teacher displays the following verb sets: draw/drew, make/made, sit/sat, tell/told, bite/bit, fly/flew, go/went, hide/hid, sing/sang. The teacher models generating a pair of sentences that use both tenses of the same verb. Students generate and share sentences. The teacher displays the sentence: He took two small suitcases with him. Following a teacher think-aloud to show students how to identify the irregular past tense verb took, students identify the irregular verbs thought, was, and saw and name the present tense.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher reviews regular past tense verbs and displays a regular and irregular past tense verb list, including the words hid, saw, came, told, ran, and sang. Students engage in oral practice using irregular verbs in sentences.
Use adjectives and adverbs, and choose between them depending on what is to be modified.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher reviews prior learning and displays a list of adjectives and adverbs, providing oral sentences as examples pointing out adjectives and adverbs in each. Adjectives: busy, clever, proud, angry, bored, easy, messy, smooth, great, deep, small, difficult; Adverbs: there, exactly, soon, suddenly, down, here, very, happily, simply, kindly. The teacher identifies and explains adjectives and adverbs using a sentence from “The Blind Men and the Elephant.” Partners use another sentence from a different paragraph in the same story to discuss the sentence, identify the adjectives and adverbs, and discuss why authors use them in writing.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher creates a two-column chart. The teacher uses the columns to generate information about and examples of adjectives and adverbs. The teacher displays a three-column chart with five sentence frames missing an adjective or an adverb, e.g., John eats ___ vegetables. The second column contains adjectives and the third lists adverbs. The teacher models how to decide whether the adjective or the adverb belongs in the frame sentence. The teacher displays four new frame sentences with a missing adjective or adverb. Students use the words from the chart to complete the sentences.
Produce, expand, and rearrange complete simple and compound sentences (e.g., The boy watched the movie; The little boy watched the movie; The action movie was watched by the little boy).
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher reminds students that a sentence tells a complete thought and includes a subject and predicate. The teacher displays text from “Robots Go to School” and models how to identify complete sentences. Partners discuss groups of words from the text to determine if they are sentences. Students identify the subject and predicate in each sentence. Volunteers share sentences with the whole class. The teacher facilitates a conversation about how paying attention to an author’s use of complete simple sentences can help students as readers and writers.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher reminds students that a compound sentence has two complete, related thoughts that are joined with a conjunction. The teacher displays the sentence: Long ago, everything was gray and cold and ugly, and the land was empty. The teacher explains that the sentence is a compound sentence because it contains two complete sentences joined by a conjunction and shows students the comma before the conjunction. The teacher displays the following sentence: Magically, when the raindrops were caught, they didn’t disappear; and soon their baskets and bags were full. The teacher explains that a semicolon can also be used to join a compound sentence. Students identify the two complete sentences and explain the meaning of the sentence.
Capitalize holidays, product names, and geographic names.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher creates a two-column chart with related common and proper nouns, including product names, geographical names, and holidays. The teacher tells students these categories of proper nouns are always capitalized. The teacher displays three sentences and models identifying the proper nouns. Students find places in their writing where they can include names of specific products, geographical locations, or holidays and add them to their writing.
In Unit 7, Week 3, Day 2, during a guided shared/interactive writing, the teacher reminds students to correct capitalization in their own writing. The teacher explains that Independence Day is capitalized in the middle of the sentence because it is a holiday.
Use commas in greetings and closings of letters.
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher displays and reads aloud the first diary entry in “The Oregon Trail” and highlights the greeting, modeling where to place the comma. “I notice that there is a comma after “Dear Diary”. “Dear Diary” is the greeting. When we write letters, we always need to put a comma after the greeting. The comma separates the greeting from the rest of the letter.” The teacher repeats the process with the closing. Partners discuss the parts of the diary entry and where the commas are placed. Students discuss how the greeting is different from the closing. Volunteers explain where commas are used in a letter or journal entry.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher displays a letter to the editor from “Bonita Springs Debates its Future” and highlights the greeting, modeling where to place the commas in a letter. The teacher reads the letter and displays the closing. Partners discuss the type of closing used and determine whether the letter is friendly or formal. Students find and discuss the commas used in a second letter’s greeting and closing and discuss where they were placed.
Use an apostrophe to form contractions and frequently occurring possessives.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher displays a list of contractions with not and is, reviews definitions of contractions, and provides examples. Students generate additional sentences using the contractions can’t, don’t, isn’t, it’s, and here’s. The teacher displays a list of possessives and provides examples, explaining that possessives show ownership. The teacher provides oral sentences and asks students to generate additional sentences using the following: John’s hat, the dog’s bone, the school’s principal, the ants’ food. The teacher uses a paragraph to model how to determine whether the word can’t is a contraction or possessive. Partners identify which words with an apostrophe are contractions and which show possession and then discuss the words that make up the contractions and which letters are replaced by the apostrophe.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 3, students revise and edit their essays focusing on capitalization and apostrophes in possessives. The teacher models the rules for apostrophes in possessives. Partners read each other’s essays looking for errors in capitalization and apostrophes in possessives, then discuss how to correct the errors. Volunteers share revisions they have made and how they knew a change was needed. During independent writing time, students continue editing their drafts, focusing on capitalization and apostrophes in possessives. Students highlight nouns and circle nouns that show ownership and check with partners to see if the apostrophes are used correctly.
Generalize learned spelling patterns when writing words (e.g., cage → badge; boy → boil).
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 4, following instruction on using common endings, letter patterns, and word parts in familiar words to decode new words while reading, students read and write groups of words and complete each word family with one or more spelling words, generating other words for each word family.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher displays letter cards for the word year. The teacher guides students to change the word to gear, dear, and deer. Students practice with fear, near, hear, spear, cheer, steer, and sheer.
Consult reference materials, including beginning dictionaries, as needed to check and correct spellings.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher models how to use singular nouns to form plural and irregular plural nouns, e.g., man/men, dog/dogs. The teacher and students create an Irregular Nouns Anchor Chart. Partners work together to write the forms of nouns on a chart. Students are provided with a dictionary and reminded they could refer to it if they are unsure of a plural form of a noun. Students write two or more sentences that include singular, plural, and irregular plural nouns during independent time.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 4, the teacher displays a text and models how to check spelling mistakes, rereading, and underlining words they are unsure of, so they remember to check the word in a dictionary. Students work with partners to review their own drafts and check spellings discussing how to revise any problems and use the dictionary to assist them with correctly spelling words.
Compare formal and informal uses of English
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 5, the teacher tells students that formal English follows grammar rules and uses precise vocabulary and that informal English may not follow grammar rules and might use contractions or slang. The teacher displays a chart showing informal sentence examples, e.g., 1 of the coolest is Arches National Park. The teacher models how to revise the sentence into formal English. Students give input to revise the remaining three sentences.
In Unit 9, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher models using sentence structure, vocabulary, and standards of language to look for clues to determine whether a passage is formal or informal English. Partners continue with the same connected text and identify sentences as formal or informal.
Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. For example:
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 4, students apply previous learning about pronouns, reflexive pronouns, adjectives, and adverbs to draft diary entries. The teacher conducts a think-aloud to highlight the effective use of pronouns, reflexive pronouns, adjectives, and adverbs. Student partners review and edit their usage of current grammar topics in their diary drafts.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher guides students to compare their draft writing to a rubric to evaluate and edit their draft carefully. Students make necessary changes before writing the final draft. Evaluation criteria on the rubric states: “includes a variety of sentence types and structures and uses adjectives and adverbs.”
Indicator 1M
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 1m.
Materials include a year-long vocabulary development plan, which lists all Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary words. The Year-Long Vocabulary Plan is organized by Unit and Weeks. The plan includes a key that outlines which vocabulary words are explicitly taught in the unit and which week the words repeat in. If the vocabulary words were previously taught, the key also notes where in the previous unit the words were taught. Vocabulary words are underlined in the daily lesson guide for teachers. Materials include defined routines for teachers to follow and multiple graphic organizers for students to record vocabulary words in various ways. Students read, write, illustrate, manipulate, and complete fill-in-the-blank prompts for practice to gain competency with vocabulary words throughout each unit.
Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a Define/Example/Ask routine to introduce new vocabulary words for each unit. The teacher provides the definition of the word and an example of the word used in a sentence within the context of the unit. Then students complete a Turn and Talk for each word to answer a question that uses the vocabulary word.
In the Program Support Guide, Building Knowledge and Vocabulary, materials include Building Vocabulary Year-long Plans that address Tier 2 General Academic and Tier 3 Domain-Specific Vocabulary for Speaking, Listening, Reading, and Writing for Grade 2. The list includes 12 words per unit and 120 vocabulary words over the course of the school year.
In the Whole Group Teacher Resources section, materials include a Vocabulary Development Tools document. The resource contains five different graphic organizers, such as Frayer Model, Concept Map, and Analogy, that can introduce new vocabulary in different ways.
Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, when previewing the fable, The Foolish Milkmaid by Aesop, students learn about the vocabulary word foolish. Students encounter the word again in Unit 7 when reading the poem, “Crazy Boys” by Beverly McLoughland.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher introduces students to the Knowledge-Building Vocabulary words services, community, symbols, and protect using the Define/Example/Ask Routine to introduce the vocabulary. Students encounter the word community again when reading the e-book, Being a Good Citizen by Katie Sharp.
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 1, while previewing the Short Read “The Oregon Trail” (author not cited), the teacher introduces the vocabulary words exhausted and supplies using the Define/Example/Ask routine. Students revisit the word supply during the Unit 9 Extended Read, “Cherokee Art Fair” by Traci Sorell.
Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher introduces the vocabulary words invention, engineer, problem, solution, and solve using the Define/Example/Ask routine. These words are essential to understanding the text Solving Problems Through Technology.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher introduces the vocabulary words scrumptious, concealed, floated, and angry using the Define/Example/Ask routine. These words are essential to understanding the text Why the Sky is Far Away retold by Eileen Robinson.
In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays and introduces words from the unit, Buyers and Sellers. During the Define/Example/Ask, students learn about the vocabulary words produce, producer, goods, resources, and choice. These words are essential to understanding the unit’s content.
Criterion 1.3: Foundational Skills
Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of most grade-level phonics standards, including knowing spelling-sound correspondence for common vowel teams, decoding regularly spelled two-syllable words, and decoding words with prefixes and suffixes. Additionally, materials include research foundations to explain guiding principles for phonics instruction and practice. The skills follow a cohesive, research-based scope and sequence that introduces letters and sounds based on utility and increasing complexity. The Grade 2 materials provide consistent guidance and opportunities for students to practice, review, decode, and encode common and additional vowel teams both in the context of connected text and in isolation. Materials include frequent opportunities for students to gain automaticity in decoding and recognition of high-frequency words. Materials provide some opportunities for students to practice word recognition and analysis skills in connected reading and writing tasks. The materials include formal and informal assessments, weekly and unit assessments, interim assessments, Quick Checks, and foundational skills screeners. Weekly and unit assessments include both comprehension and foundational skills items. The materials include a guide to planning yearly assessments that includes an overview of the different assessments and guidelines for the timing and frequency of use. Materials include foundational skills supports for English language learners, students in special populations, and above-grade-level students. Materials include a master program support document “Supports for Exceptional Learners” that outlines the variety of supports built into the program for all three groups of students.
Indicator 1N
Materials, questions, and tasks directly teach foundational skills to build reading acquisition by providing systematic and explicit instruction in the alphabetic principle, letter-sound relationships, phonemic awareness, and phonics that demonstrate a transparent and research-based progression for application both in and out of context.
Indicator 1N.i
Explicit instruction in phonological awareness (K-1) and phonics (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1n.i.
The Grade 2 materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of most grade-level phonics standards, including knowing spelling-sound correspondence for common vowel teams, decoding regularly spelled two-syllable words, and decoding words with prefixes and suffixes. The materials support teachers with explicit examples for modeling and with examples to use for further student practice. The materials provide the teacher with words for each sound-spelling pattern as well as the proper way to break words into sounds and syllables. The materials contain frequent opportunities for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern in context. The materials include opportunities for students to distinguish between short and long vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words.
Materials include a review of previously taught phonological awareness skills. For example:
Short and long vowels are explicitly reviewed in the first six weeks and instruction includes opportunities to contrast short and long vowel sounds, reinforcing instruction from Grade K and 1.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher reviews that each vowel has a short and long sound. The teacher states each sound (long and short), then students repeat. For example, the short sound of a is /ă/; the long sound of a is /ā/.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher asks students to listen for the long e sound in words. The teacher models the short and long sound, has students repeat, points to the letters in random order, and asks students to provide the short and long vowel sound for each one.
Materials contain explicit instructions for systematic and repeated teacher modeling of all grade-level phonics standards. For example:
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words:
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher introduces the long a sound-spelling card and specifically mentions the long a spellings a, ai, ay, a_e. The teacher models building and sounding out the word pan and adding the vowel i to make the word pain. The teacher repeats the routine with the words man, main; plan, plain.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays letter cards for the word cut and models blending the sounds. The teacher adds a final -e to change the word to cute and models blending the new word with the following script: “I can add an i to the end to make the final e vowel spelling u_e. The vowel spelling u_e can stand for the long u sound. Listen as I blend the new word: /cūūūt/. Say the word with me: cute.” The teacher uses the script to repeat instruction with the following word pairs: us/use, hug/huge.
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher writes and displays words on index cards: broke, both, grow, globe, toe, bowl, float, throw, roast, going. Students read and spell each word chorally. The teacher makes four columns by placing words at the top: roast, both, grow, broke. The teacher guides students to sort the remaining words into the columns. When complete, students chorally read and spell the words in each column.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher introduces the vowel team /oi/ with the Sound-Spelling card and provides words with the /oi/ sound. The teacher blends and builds words with /oi/, having students provide the new words when adding a letter.
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 4, the teacher explains, “when a vowel team such as ee, ea, ey, or ie appears in a long word, the vowel team remains in the same syllable.” The teacher models reading the word peanut. The teacher follows a read, build, write routine for treetop, seashell, keyhole, cornfield, seatbelt, beehive.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher explains that when a vowel team such as oo, ui, ew, ue, ou, or oe appears in a long word, the letters in the vowel team remain together in the same syllable because the two letters go together to make one sound. The teacher models reading the word rooftop by writing the word and pointing out the vowel team /oo/ spelling oo. The teacher adds top and explains that it is a closed syllable. The teacher circles the vowel spellings oo and o and tells students that each syllable has one vowel sound and to divide the word between the two consonants in the middle: roof/top. The teacher models blending syllables to read the word.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes:
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher introduces the words player and illustrator and explains that adding -er or -or to a verb can change the verb into a noun: teach, teacher. The teacher continues modeling with a list of words and asks students to write and underline the -er and -or, pointing out the base word and discussing how adding the ending changes the meaning of the word. The teacher blends and builds words with the letter cards: baker: sleeper, runner, skater, visitor, doctor, author.
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher tells students, “A prefix is a word part added to the beginning of a word. Adding a prefix makes a new word with a different pronunciation and meaning.” The teacher explains the meaning of the prefixes un-, re-, and dis- and models building and reading the words unpack, reread, and disbelieve.
Identify words with inconsistent but common spelling-sound correspondences:
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 2, the teacher writes and displays the words boy, toy, boil, coin, join, enjoy, joyful, point, noise, voice on index cards. Students chorally read and spell each word. The teacher makes a two-column chart with the word coin on top of one and boy on the other. The students sort the cards by their spelling, oi or oy. When the columns are finished, students chorally read and spell the words in each column. The teacher points out that oi is in the middle of words and oy at the end of words.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher displays “the complex vowel /oo/ spelling” along with a picture of a book and the spellings oo, u displayed underneath. The teacher says the vowel team and writes the words hood, foot, bush, and underlines the spelling. The materials call for the teacher to display the word could and compare the vowel sound. The teacher connects “could to would and should to highlight the common spelling pattern.”
Lessons provide teachers with systematic and repeated instruction for students to hear, say, encode, and read each newly taught grade-level phonics pattern. For example:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher reviews r-controlled vowels and uses an e-pocket chart to build words, e.g., tore, torn, worn, wore. Students blend and read each word. The teacher asks students to sort spelling words into their spelling pattern; words include fork, born, oars, roar, wore, more. The teacher gives students letter cards and asks students to build additional words, e.g., fort, short, shore.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 2, students practice r-controlled vowel patterns through blending multisyllabic words with suffixes after teaching modeling, blending, and building words with suffixes -er and -est, and whisper reading and choral reading connected text containing multisyllabic words with suffixes.
Indicator 1N.ii
Phonological awareness based on a research-based continuum (K-1).
Indicator 1N.iii
Phonics demonstrated with a research-based progression of skills (K-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1n.iii.
The Grade 2 materials include research foundations to explain guiding principles for phonics instruction and practice. The skills follow a cohesive, research-based scope and sequence that introduces letters and sounds based on utility and increasing complexity. The Scope and Sequence delineates primary, secondary, and spiral review patterns for each unit. There are opportunities for students to apply new phonics skills as well as previously taught phonics skills. Students have various ways to manipulate individual phonemes and spell words using new spelling patterns as well as many opportunities to apply these skills to context, e.g., decodable readers. Phonics skills are taught and practiced both in isolation and in the context of decoding and encoding words, sentences, and texts.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode (phonemes, onset and rime, and/or syllables) phonetically spelled words. For example:
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 4, the teacher explains that when a vowel team like ai or ay appears in a long word, the vowel team sticks together in the same syllable because the two letters stand for one vowel sound. Following teacher modeling, students use letter cards to build and then write the words painting, railway, remain, subway, today, pregame.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, students practice reading multisyllabic words with long u spelling patterns: use, useless. The teacher models decoding by analogy using words: few and nephew. Students practice with confuse and curfew. Students read “Vote for Lulu” to transfer skills to a text.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes.
In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher displays the following words on index cards. Students read, chorally spell, and sort the words according to the suffix: shiny, slowly, lucky, neatly, sunny, likely, messy, quickly, rainy, friendly.
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher models naming a base word and underlining the prefix un-. Students write and read the words unclear, uneasy, replace, refill, disklike, disobey and identify the prefix and base word. During Reading Big Words, students practice reading the words unlucky, dishonestly, uncaringly. During Word Study, students build and read the words unclog, unlatched, reopen, reheat, disagree, dishonest.
Identify words with inconsistent but common spelling-sound correspondences.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 1, students practice reading words with r-controlled vowels air, are, ear, ere.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, students blend and build words with /oo/ sounds. The words include suit, flew, clue, Ruth, soup, shoes, tune.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to read complete words by saying the entire word as a unit using newly taught phonics skills. For example:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays the sound-spelling for long /o/. The teacher writes words and asks students to read the words coat, gold, blown, toe, home. Students also chorally read mulit-syllabic compound words containing the previously mentioned long o words.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 2, students build and read words with r-Controlled vowels ear, eer, ere. The teacher builds the word year and models blending then saying the word. Students practice blending and reading words: fear, near, hear, spear, cheer, steer, sheer.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to decode words in a sentence. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 2, students whisper read the decodable text Rules and Laws. The teacher models blending decodable words. Students engage in a choral reading of the text.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 3, students practice decoding r-Controlled vowels or, oar, ore in the text “Fox Makes Friends” from Texts for Close Reading.
Lessons provide students with frequent opportunities to build/manipulate/spell and encode words using common and newly-taught sound and spelling patterns phonics. For example:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher displays the word cards: fork, oars, more, store, born, roar, before, horn, sports, wore. Students read and chorally spell each word, then sort the words under the headings fork, oars, and more. Students choral read and spell the words in each column.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher checks students’ spelling of weekly words by saying each spelling word and using it in a sentence. Students write the word: faster, fastest, slower, slowest, newer, newest, colder, coldest, taller, tallest.
Materials contain a variety of methods to promote students’ practice of previously taught grade level phonics. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 2, students practice blending and building words. Words are listed for Spiral Review: car, cart, card, hard, harm, farm, farmer.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 2, students practice blending and building words. Words are listed for Spiral Review: toy, boy, boil, broil.
Materials clearly delineate a scope and sequence with a cohesive, intentional sequence of phonics instruction and practice to build toward application of skills. For example:
In the Program Support Guide, the Scope and Sequence outlines a sequence of phonics instruction that moves from simple to complex, moving from short vowels to closed and open syllable patterns, then vowel team and r-controlled vowel syllable patterns, then compound words, inflectional endings, and prefixes and suffixes.
In the Program Support Guide, the Scope and Sequence delineates primary, secondary, and spiral review patterns for each unit. The spiral review covers phonics patterns from previous units.
Materials have a clear research-based explanation for the order of the phonics sequence. For example:
In the Program Support Guide, the Phonics Overview document uses Scarborough’s Reading Rope and A Fresh Look at Phonics by Wiley Blevins to explain how the “12 Elements of Phonics Success” are built into the program.
In the Program Support Guide, Wiley Blevins’ Phonics and the Way to Meaning document provides research-based support for the materials’ phonics approach, emphasizing blending sounds to sound out words rather than memorizing sight words and story patterns.
In the Program Support Guide, Phonics/Word Study Research Foundations & Scope and Sequences, the explanation includes guiding principles including teaching short-vowel sounds before long-vowel sounds, teaching consonants and short vowels in combination, and teaching higher-utility letters early in order for more words to be made, read, and spelled.
Materials provide sufficient opportunities for students to develop orthographic and phonological processing. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 4, students practice decoding the words few nephew, confuse, curfew. Students practice writing spelling words including huge, rescue, few.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher displays the Sound-Spelling Card for the diphthong /ou/ and tells students, “This is a picture of a cow. The vowel sound in cow is /ou/. The sound /ou/ is spelled two ways: ou and ow. In the word cow /ou/ is spelled with ow.” The teacher provides an example for both spellings and models blending the words. The teacher says the following words, and students listen for the /ou/ sound, write the word, and underline the spelling for /ou/: proud, out, town, vow.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays the Sound-Spelling Card for the vowel team /oo/ and tells students, “This is a picture of a spoon. The vowel sound in spoon is /ōō/. The sound /ōō/ is spelled many ways: oo, u_e, u, ew, ue, ou, ui, oe. In the word spoon /ōō/ is spelled with oo.” The teacher provides an example for all spellings and models blending the words. The teacher says the following words, and students listen for the /ōō/ sound, write the word, and underline the spelling for /ōō/: soon, suit, grew, glue, duty, group, prune.
Indicator 1N.iv
Decode and encode common and additional vowel teams (Grade 2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1.n.iv.
The Grade 2 materials provide consistent guidance and opportunities for students to practice, review, decode, and encode common and additional vowel teams both in the context of connected text and in isolation. Students have ample opportunities to read and reread multiple decodable texts to practice their phonics skills. Materials include practice opportunities throughout the week in accountable/decodable texts, anchor texts, vocabulary practice texts, poetry selections, and other book collections.
Materials include ample opportunities over the course of the year for students to decode and encode common vowel teams. For example:
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, Lesson 2 the teacher displays letters cards for the word got and models blending the sounds. The teacher adds an a to change the word to goat and models blending the new word. The teacher repeats instruction with the following word pairs: cop/cope, log/low, top/toe. Students practice decoding the words boat, toast, cold, hold, Joe, toe, bowl, snow, grow, note, and mode.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher introduces the long e sound-spelling card with the ee, e, y, ey, ie, and e_e spellings for long e. The teacher models building and blending the word bed and adds the letter a to make the word bead. Students read each word and repeat the routine for the word sets: set, seat; fed, feed. Students practice reading long e words such as she, me, keep, meet.
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 2, Lesson 5, the teacher displays letter cards for the word too and models blending the sounds. The teacher adds on th to the end and models blending the new word tooth. The teacher repeats instruction with the words booth and boot.
Materials include multiple opportunities over the course of the year for students to decode and encode additional vowel teams. For example:
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, students practice blending and building words by building a word with a short vowel sound, then adding a letter to create a long vowel team/sound such as pan/pain. The teacher writes words, and students chorally blend the sounds to read them: hazy, basic, brain, break, chain, day, gray, great, snail, snake, shade.
In Unit 6, Week 3, Day 1, the teacher introduces the sound-spelling card for the complex vowel /o/ spelled aw, au, ai, (w)a. The teacher writes the words talk, draw, hand, wash, and underlines the spellings. The teacher asks students to write the words flaw, Paul, walk, wasp and underlines the spelling. The teacher writes the words claw, jaw, sauce, taught, call, malt, talk, chalk, and students chorally blend each word. During small group instruction, the teacher gives students letter cards, and students blend and build the words mall, vault, wash. Students practice writing spelling words, including the words tall, talk, draw, fault.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to review previously learned common and additional vowel teams. For example:
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, spelling practice includes a spiral review of the words: due, pound, gown, pointed, boyhood.
The Word Study Resources materials provide “Build Automaticity” pages that review previously learned vowel teams. Students read each word with the teacher, underline the vowel pattern, read each word independently, then time their word reading with a partner for one minute.
Indicator 1O
Materials, questions, and tasks provide explicit instruction for and regular practice to address the acquisition of print concepts, including alphabetic knowledge, directionality, and function (K-1), structures and features of text (1-2).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1o.
The Grade 2 materials contain frequent and adequate opportunities for students to identify text structures and text features and apply these skills. The materials provide instruction and practice identifying and using text features, including title, headings, table of contents, and graphics. The teacher models using text features, and students have frequent opportunities to explain how to use the text features to build an understanding of the text.
Students have frequent opportunities to identify text structures (e.g., main idea and details, sequence of events, problem and solution, compare and contrast, cause and effect). For example:
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher explains the structure of good narrative fiction. The teacher explains that good narrative fiction has a beginning that introduces the characters, setting, and problem, a middle where the characters try to solve the problem, and an end where the problem is solved. The teacher uses "Stone Soup" as an example of a good narrative text structure.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 1, during Short Read One, the teacher displays the text, “The Art of Origami,” and asks students to preview the text and notice the text structure and graphic features and the metacognitive anchor charts, reminding students that there are many strategies for making meaning with new text.
Materials include lessons and activities about text features (e.g., title, byline, headings, table of contents, glossary, pictures, illustrations). For example:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher guides students to text features “such as the title, author’s name, and illustrations.” The teacher asks students how illustrations help infer information about the character in the story.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher models using the title “to identify important information.”
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher displays the text, “The Oregon Trail” and explains that text features are parts of the text that help readers find information more easily and give more information about the topic, pointing out a subheading. The teacher models how the author uses journal entries to divide the text and how to use the subheadings to find key facts about the events. Students work with a group to use subheadings to help locate key information, pointing out that dates are arranged chronologically. Students use the subheadings to answer various comprehension questions.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher tells students that many texts contain graphics, such as illustrations, photographs, and maps, that give information about a topic. The teacher displays a map from the mentor text “Wind and Water Shape Arches National Park.” The teacher models getting information from the map and adding that information to research notes. Students choose a text from their independent research and identify information provided through a graphic.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher displays the text, “Sand Sculpture” and reviews and defines text features, and poses text evidence questions for small groups to focus on for discussion. The teacher models and reviews that text features are elements of a text that are not in the main body, such as subheadings, bold print, sidebars, glossaries, indexes, table of contents, electronic menus, icons, and captions. Students work in small groups to use text features to answer comprehension questions and locate information. Students share out specifically how they used the text features, especially captions, to locate information and understand the text.
Indicator 1P
Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and gain decoding automaticity and sight-based recognition of high-frequency words. This includes reading fluency in oral reading beginning in mid-Grade 1 and through Grade 2.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1p.
The Grade 2 materials include frequent opportunities for students to gain automaticity in decoding and recognition of high-frequency words. Each week, students engage in repeated readings of grade-level texts, and the materials link decoding of these texts to comprehension. Materials include weekly explicit instruction and practice recognizing high-frequency words, introducing 300 words throughout ten units. Materials contain consistent weekly lessons indicating the teacher models fluent reading of text. The materials provide students frequent opportunities to hear fluent reading of shared and mentor texts and to practice fluent reading of grade-level texts. The materials include explicit instructional routines for all areas of reading fluency, and the materials directly refer the teacher to these routines for instruction, modeling, and student practice.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to purposefully read on-level text. For example:
Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.
In Unit 5, Components at a Glance, students read one word study text each week: “A Cool Solution,” “Satellites,” “Music for Joy”), two short reads each week: “A Woman with a Vision,” “A Lucky Accident”, and two extended reads each week: “Two Famous Inventors,” “Robots Go to School”. The unit also includes texts for small-group reading at a range of second-grade levels and vocabulary practice e-books. The text has a Connect Phonics to Comprehension exercise. The teacher asks comprehension questions, and students use the text and pictures to answer the questions.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 3, students read Texts for Close Reading “Up, Up, and Away” and connect phonics to comprehension through discussion questions.
Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy, rate, and expression in oral reading with on-level text and grade-level decodable words. For example:
Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.
In Unit 1, Additional Resources, Instructional Routines and Strategies, the materials provide instructional routines in areas of fluency: Inflection/Intonation - Pitch, Volume, Stress; Speed/Pacing - Slow, Varied, Fast; Dramatic Expression - Characterization/Feelings, Anticipation/Mood; Phrasing - Units of Meaning in Complex Sentences, Dependent Clauses; Confirm or Correct Word Recognition and Understanding; Short Pauses; Full Stops; High-Frequency Word Phrases. Each routine includes teacher modeling along with explicit instruction and student practice.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 1, during Extended Read One, the teacher explains that fluent reading requires readers to adjust their speed, reading at a slower pace to make sure they read all the words correctly and understand the text. The teacher follows the fluency routine to model reading at a slower pace and provides guided practice using paragraphs 1 and 2 of “Stone Soup.” Students partner-read for additional practice.
In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 4, the teacher may “wish to conduct a rereading of ‘Trading This for That’ or ‘A Baker’s Dozen’ or another text in your classroom collection for additional practice with accountable text.”
In Reader’s Theater, Unit 6, The Boy Who Cried Wolf, Lesson 2, the teacher models reading with expression and how to “alter your voice to convey the character’s emotion.” Students chorally read and then echo read the script.
Materials provide opportunities for students to hear fluent reading of grade-level text by a model reader. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher explains that fluent reading requires readers to read with phrasing. The teacher uses the “Phrasing - Units of Meaning in Complex Sentences” instructional routine to model reading paragraph two of “Our Government’s Laws” by Nya Brown.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher explains that fluent reading requires reading with dramatic expression. The teacher uses the “Expression - Dramatic Expression” instructional routine to model reading paragraphs 11-12 of “A Foxy Garden” by Jeffrey B. Fuerst.
Materials include systematic and explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words. For example:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher uses the Read, Spell, Write, Apply routine to introduce high-frequency words: long, now, our, some, them, through, upon, was, when, work. The teacher displays the word card, says the word, and has students repeat it. The teacher points out the sounds and spellings. The teacher points to each letter and spells the word. The students repeat. Students write the word. Partners take turns using the word in an oral sentence. The routine is repeated for each high-frequency word.
In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher displays high-frequency words. The teacher asks students to read and spell each word chorally. The teacher dictates “each word without showing it,” and students write the word, self-correcting spelling after the word is displayed. Words displayed include before, done, about, even. The teacher asks students to practice high-frequency words with a Read, Build, Write routine. Students build each word with letter cards and use the word in a sentence. Words include before, done, about, even, every, near, school, earth.
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher uses the Read, Spell, Write, Apply routine to introduce the words built, correct, inside, island, language, oh, person, street, system, and warm. The teacher displays the word cards and points to and reads the word. Students repeat the word. The teacher points out the sounds and spellings in each word. The teacher points to each letter and spells the word. Students read and spell the word. Students write the word as they spell it out loud. Partners use each word in an oral sentence.
Students have opportunities to practice and read irregularly spelled words in isolation. For example:
Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 3, the teacher displays high-frequency words, asks students to read and spell each word, and write each word chorally. Words displayed include come, here, to, of.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 3, the teacher draws a ladder with ten rungs and writes a high-frequency word on each rung. Students take turns “climbing the ladder” by reading the words: always, any, blue, buy, city, draw, four, great, how, live.
Materials include a sufficient quantity of new grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words for students to make reading progress. For example:
In the Scope and Sequence, materials list High-Frequency Words that are introduced across the ten units at a rate of 10 words per week for a total of 300 words.
Indicator 1Q
Materials, questions, and tasks provide systematic and explicit instruction in and practice of word recognition and analysis skills in a research-based progression in connected text and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1q.
Grade 2 materials provide some opportunities for students to practice word recognition and analysis skills in connected reading and writing tasks. A scope and sequence delineate when phonics skills and high-frequency words occur over the course of the year. The materials include a variety of decodable texts and interactive texts that have newly taught phonics skills and high-frequency words. Students engage in authentic writing experiences daily and receive explicit instruction on how to transfer their growing phonics skills into writing. Materials include instruction on applying phonics skills to writing and applying word analysis to connected writing tasks.
Materials support students’ development to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills (e.g., apply spelling-sound relationship on common words, decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels, decode words with common prefixes and suffixes) in connected text and tasks. For example:
Distinguish long and short vowels when reading regularly spelled one-syllable words.
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher models with the words tap, tape, guiding students to change the middle sound from short /a/ to long /a/ in tape. The teacher repeats the routine, substituting the medial sound with the words hop/hope; set/seat; bit/bite; cut/cute. The teacher displays the letter cards for rip and models blending the sounds and reading the word. The teacher models how to replace consonants and vowels to make new words: rip, dip, drip, drop, crop, lip, slip, flip; top, stop, step; hop, chop, shop; hat, chat, that; run, sun, spun.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher displays the letter cards for cut and models how to blend and read the sounds together, running a hand under each letter. The teacher adds an -e to the end of the word and continues to model how to blend and read the word, explaining that by adding the -e now the vowel is a long vowel (cute). The teacher continues modeling with the following words: us, use, hug, huge.
Know spelling-sound correspondences for additional common vowel teams.
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 2, students read the accountable text, “All About Squirrels,” containing words with long a vowel teams.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 3, students decode words with long e spellings in the story “Bee and Daisy” from Texts for Close Reading page 17: ee, ea, e, y, ey, ie, e_e.
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 3, students decode words with vowel teams /oi/: oi, oy in “Satellites” from Texts for Close Reading page 17.
Decode regularly spelled two-syllable words with long vowels.
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 2, students read the interactive text, “Found,” which includes two-syllables long and short vowel words with -le endings.
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 3, students read the decodable text “The Baseball” by Lonnie Smith, including compound words with long vowels: baseball, handmade, newspaper, childhood.
Decode words with common prefixes and suffixes.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 2, students practice decoding words with prefixes tri- and un- and suffix -ed in States of Matter, “The Art of Origami.”
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 4, students practice decoding by analogy with prefixes un- re- dis-.
In Unit 10, Week 3, Day 3, students focus on suffixes -ful and -less: helpful, colorful, painless, fearless. The teacher reads the text’s title, “New Planets,” and points out words with suffixes -ful and -less, such as beautiful and wonderful in the first paragraph and useless in the third paragraph. Students whisper-read the text as the teacher circulates and gives corrective feedback and modeling how to blend decodable and read high-frequency words that students struggle with.
Materials provide frequent opportunities to read irregularly spelled words in connected text and tasks. For example:
Recognize and read grade-appropriate irregularly spelled words.
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 3, students read, “Firefly Tricks Spider” from Texts for Close Reading, practicing high-frequency words: good, many, near, off, people, right, that, two, under, very.
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 5, students practice reading high-frequency words: all, away, better, by, change, done, even, found, learn, in Texts for Close Reading, “The President’s House.”
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 3, students read the decodable text, “A Cool Solution” by Jasmine Gomez. The teacher tells students that the word have is irregular and is not a VCe syllable.
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 2, students read the interactive text ,“The Wright Brothers Take Off!” containing words with silent letters.
Lessons and activities provide students some opportunities to learn grade-level word recognition and analysis skills while encoding (writing) in context and decoding words (reading) in connected text and tasks. For example:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 3, students read the decodable text, “Meet Ranger Diaz.” The teacher models blending decodable words and reading high-frequency words, and students practice.
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 5, during Spelling Patterns and Dictation, students write the following spelling words: pie, tie, child, kind, sky, dry, high, lime, light, bright during a spelling assessment. The teacher states the word and uses each word in a sentence. The teacher can have students write the word or the sentence. Encoding during Spelling Patterns and Dictation is limited to the assessment.
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level phonics skills aligned to the program’s scope and sequence. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 3, Day 2, the teacher guides students through a reading of Interactive Text, “The New Guy” focusing on r-controlled vowel /ur/.
In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 2, students decode r-controlled vowels air and are in “Pecos Bill” from Word Study Resources.
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 2, students read the interactive text “Our Sandcastles,” which contains words that end in -or or -er.
Materials include decodable texts that contain grade-level high-frequency/irregularly spelled words aligned to the program’s scope and sequence.
The Scope and Sequence lists high-frequency words: point, second, think, until, white, river, song, three, watch, young for Unit 6, Week 1. The words are introduced on Day 1, practiced on Day 2, read in Texts for Close Reading “Hansel and Gretel” on Day 3.
In Unit 9, Week 2, Day 3, students read the decodable text, “Zollipops” by Juan Pablo Nobrega. The teacher models how to read the passage’s high-frequency words, and students practice.
Indicator 1R
Materials support ongoing and frequent assessment to determine student mastery and inform meaningful differentiation of foundational skills, including a clear and specific protocol as to how students performing below standard on these assessments will be supported.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1r.
Grade 2 materials provide multiple foundational skills assessments. The materials include formal and informal assessments, weekly and unit assessments, interim assessments, Quick Checks, and foundational skills screeners. Weekly and unit assessments include both comprehension and foundational skills items. Unit assessments include student-read passages; however, the unit assessment passages are designed to measure comprehension. The materials include a guide to planning yearly assessments that includes an overview of the different assessments and guidelines for the timing and frequency of use. Materials include information for teachers to use scores to determine current levels of student proficiency. Materials include resources to directly match assessment results to intervention or extension resources as needed. While all necessary assessment components are present, navigation of the multitude of related but separate assessment pieces is not streamlined.
Multiple assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate progress toward mastery and independence of foundational skills. For example:
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of phonics and decoding.
In Informal Assessments Grades K-6, Supporting Reading Development, an Individual Reading Observation Checklist includes: searches through the difficult word and blends sounds together, takes apart words using large units or syllables.
In Informal Assessments, Grades K-6, Supporting Reading Development, an Individual Reading Observation Checklist includes: decodes text using knowledge of the structure of words such as endings, prefixes, suffixes, compound words, contractions, and root words. Identifies variant sounds of consonants and vowels, integrates meaning, structure, and visual cues to decode and comprehend text.
In Assessments, Phonics and Word Recognition, the Skills Quick Checks Grades K-2 include subtests to measure students’ ability to identify sounds and decode and encode words. The subtests include the following: initial and final consonants, consonant blends and digraphs, silent letters, short and long vowels, r-controlled vowels, vowel teams, contractions, compound words, plural nouns, inflectional endings, prefixes, suffixes.
In Assessments, Weekly and Unit Assessments, materials provide weekly assessments and end of unit assessments that measure student progress on recently-taught skills. These assessments include opportunities to identify and match sounds and to decode words in passages.
In Assessment, Weekly & Unit Assessments, Unit 3, Week 1, the teacher asks students to choose a word with the same vowel sound as blue; multiple choice selections include the words drum, tune, luck.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of word recognition and analysis. For example:
In Informal Assessments, Grades K-6, Supporting Reading Development, an Individual Reading Observation Checklist includes: decodes text using knowledge of common letter-sound correspondences, including blends, digraphs, consonant variants, r-controlled vowels, Decodes text using knowledge of the structure of words such as endings, prefixes, suffixes, compound words, contractions, and root words.
In Assessments, Phonics and Word Recognition, the Skills Quick Checks Grades K -2 include ten subtests to measure students’ ability to read high-frequency words. The subtests follow the sequence of high-frequency word instruction.
In Assessments, Weekly and Unit Assessments, the materials provide weekly assessments and end of unit assessments that measure student progress in recently-taught skills. These assessments include opportunities to identify recently-taught high-frequency words in a passage.
Materials include assessment opportunities that measure student progress of fluency. For example:
In Informal Assessments Grades. K-6, Supporting Reading Development, an Individual Reading Observation Checklist includes: Reads fluently, reads longer texts with greater accuracy, reads high-frequency words fluently.
In Assessments, Fluency Quick Checks, the materials include 10 Grade 2 assessment passages that can be used to assess oral reading accuracy, reading rate, and fluency (phrasing, intonation, and expression). The passages are identified at Lexile levels of 100L-230L, 230L-380L, and 360L-530L The teacher selects the “right” passages from the various ranges. Students read passages at their instructional reading level defined as 95-98% accuracy while the teacher records running record data, calculating Oral Reading Accuracy (%), Reading Rate, Comprehension # Correct, Fluency Rating of 1-4.
In Assessments, Fluency Quick Checks, the Additional Teacher Resources section contains alternate fluency assessments, including fluency rubrics, fluency self assessments, reader’s theater self-assessments and performance assessments, and oral presentation assessments.
Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current skills/level of understanding. For example:
In Assessments, Foundational Skills Screeners, the Introduction indicates how to use screener assessment data to determine current levels. The materials indicate that if students score between 81-100% overall, those students are at or above grade level. If students score between 65-80%, those students are meeting grade level expectations. If students score under 65%, those students are below grade-level expectations.
In Assessments, Weekly and Unit Assessments, Answer Keys and Item Rationales, the materials provide correlated standards to each multiple choice question for each weekly and each unit assessment. The materials provide rationales for each correct and incorrect answer as well as a scoring rubric for written assessment tasks.
In Assessments, Weekly and Unit Assessments, the Overview explains that the Benchmark Education online platform organizes student scores on unit assessments into the following percentage bands to help teachers evaluate how well students understand recently-taught skills: 0-39%, 40-59%, 60-79%, 80-100%. The Answer Key and Rationales provide more detailed analyses of student scores, as each assessment item indicated the tested standard or skill.
Materials support teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery in foundational skills.
In Assessments, Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Check to Intervention Resource Map, the materials provide a resource map that identifies intervention lessons for the following phonics skills: initial and final consonants, consonant blends and digraphs, silent letters, short and long vowels, r-controlled vowels, vowel teams, contractions, compound words, plural nouns, inflectional endings, prefixes, suffixes. The map provides teachers with the page numbers of intervention lessons directly matched to Quick Check assessment items.
In Assessments, Fluency, the Fluency Quick Check Resource Map provides a map of fluency intervention lessons that match each fluency skill and quick check. The directions for assessment outline how to assess each skill and determine whether a student is in need of intervention lessons.
In Assessments, Weekly and Unit Assessments, materials provide two assessments per unit in Weeks 1 and 2. The directions indicate if a student is not making progress, “that may indicate a need for further observation or individualized help.”
In Unit 9, Intervention and Reteaching Resources, a correlation chart provides reteaching lessons and practice activities for the unit's phonological awareness, phonics and word recognition, and fluency skills. The materials indicate that the reteaching and practice activities should be based on weekly and unit assessment results and observations. The chart indicates which Quick Check assessment(s) teachers should use to monitor student progress.
Indicator 1S
Materials, questions, and tasks provide high-quality lessons and activities that allow for differentiation of foundational skills, so all students achieve mastery of foundational skills.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for 1s.
Grade 2 materials include foundational skills supports for English language learners, students in special populations, and above-grade-level students. Materials include a master program support document “Supports for Exceptional Learners” that outlines the variety of supports built into the program for all three groups of students. While the chart provides suggestions, the suggestions are general and offer strategies rather than providing access to specific activities to further skills in individual standards. The chart provides strategies for each component in the program and contains the same general recommendations for Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Intervention supports for students in special populations are both embedded in small-group lessons and included in separate, comprehensive intervention materials. ELL and above-grade level supports are built into whole-group and small-group lessons. The materials provide extensions or advanced opportunities to apply foundational skills through knowledge-based writing and challenge word study. The Above-Level Student Supports for Phonics: 30-Week Plan provides guidance on extensions and/or advanced opportunities to engage with foundational skills at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
Materials provide general strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards. For example:
In the Program Support Guide, Supports for Exceptional Learners outline the variety of supports built into the program for English learners, including “Language Transfer Support” in phonics lessons and grammar in context lessons, ways to scaffold the first reading, and Contrastive Analysis of Nine World Languages.
In the Whole Group Teacher Resources, Multilingual Glossary, the materials provide definitions, a photograph, the spoken English word, and the corresponding written word in ten languages.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 3, there is English Language Development for light, moderate, and substantial support. For light support, students are to write words on the board that end with a single consonant. The teacher asks how to add -ing or -ed to each word. Volunteers change the words on the board. Students use the words in sentences. For moderate support, students review the instructional rules, write the words on cards, sort the words, and write the words on the board by adding inflectional endings. Students use the words in sentences. The teacher provides sentence starters as needed. For substantial support, the teacher prepares word cards and inflectional ending cards. Students manipulate cards to create new words.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 1, the materials include Language Transfer Support for the lesson’s target inflectional endings. The materials indicate that comparative adjectives do not change form in Hmong and Korean. If students use more and most incorrectly, the teacher writes the sentences and edits them with students. Students practice saying the sentences correctly.
Materials provide general strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level foundational skills and to meet or exceed grade-level standards. For example:
In the Program Support Guide, Supports for Exceptional Learners outline the variety of supports built into the program for students with special needs that includes intervention and reteaching resources, blend and build words spiral review, access features in reading and writing lessons, phonics manipulative and e-pocket chart, ways to scaffold the first reading, and interactive audio-assisted e-books.
In the Intervention Materials, the materials include sets of intervention lessons for fluency (12 lessons), phonics and word recognition (122 lessons), phonological awareness (20 lessons), and print concepts (10 lessons).
In Intervention, Phonics and Word Recognition, Lesson 121, the teacher displays the frieze cards for long and short o and reviews the sounds. The teacher uses the words drop/drove, stop/smoke, and pond/close to teach patterns that make short and long vowel sounds. Students practice spelling words with long and short vowel sounds. The lesson includes a formative assessment and follow-up interventions to use in response to specific student misconceptions.
In Additional Resources, Access and Equity, the materials recommend getting to know the students, utilizing the IEP or 504 plan, and working collaboratively with the special education teachers. Materials also provide research-based suggestions for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders and a chart outlining the program components alongside suggestions, if applicable, regarding modifying lesson components to support students with challenges in oral language, decoding, comprehension, and written language.
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the materials include a note about remediation, “for students below grade-level expectations, continue to teach previously taught skills they have not yet mastered. Focus on blending, dictation, word building, and reading and writing about decodable texts.”
Materials provide extensions and/or advanced opportunities to engage with foundational skills at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level. For example:
The Above-Level Student Supports for Phonics: 30-Week Plan provides guidance on acceleration and enrichment and daily skill-specific extension activities for
each week of the explicit, systematic Grade 2 phonics instruction. Activities include blending, spelling/dictation, blending and building words, word sorts, and writing extensions.
The Program Support Guide, Supports for Exceptional Learners outlines the variety of foundational skills supports built into the program for high-ability learners, including blend and build words challenge practice, small-group acceleration prompts, and classroom book clubs.
In Additional Resources, Access and Equity, Phonics, Page AR62, suggestions for accommodations include, “provide more complex words and sound combinations”
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the small-group acceleration instructions indicate that the teacher should teach a skill further along in the phonics scope and sequence during small-group time.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 1, includes a note about acceleration “for students above grade-level expectations, continue to teach a skill further in the phonetics scope and sequence during small group time.”
Overview of Gateway 2
Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks
Some texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including life science, perspectives in literature, government and citizenship, and themes across cultures. Materials include various opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple Mentor, Read-Alouds, Shared Readings, and Extended Reads according to grade-level standards. Materials contain coherently sequenced text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts. Each unit has an Inquiry and Research project that incorporates texts from the unit as well as outside sources, as appropriate. Each project answers the essential question, includes text evidence and cross-text analysis, and addresses the enduring understanding for the unit. Culminating tasks include opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level reading, speaking, listening, and writing standards from the unit. Materials include a year-long plan grounded in standards alignment to support students’ writing development and proficiency. Writing lessons, tasks, and projects authentically integrate with reading, speaking, listening, and language and include learning, practice, and application of writing skills. Materials include research projects sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills, and each project provides an opportunity for students to confront and analyze different aspects of a unit topic in greater depth using multiple texts and other source materials.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge
Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.
Some texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including life science, perspectives in literature, government and citizenship, and themes across cultures. Materials include various opportunities for students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple Mentor, Read-Alouds, Shared Readings, and Extended Reads according to grade-level standards. Materials contain coherently sequenced text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts. Each unit has an Inquiry and Research project that incorporates texts from the unit as well as outside sources, as appropriate. Each project answers the essential question, includes text evidence and cross-text analysis, and addresses the enduring understanding for the unit. Culminating tasks include opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level reading, speaking, listening, and writing standards from the unit. Materials include a year-long plan grounded in standards alignment to support students’ writing development and proficiency. Writing lessons, tasks, and projects authentically integrate with reading, speaking, listening, and language and include learning, practice, and application of writing skills. Materials include research projects sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills, and each project provides an opportunity for students to confront and analyze different aspects of a unit topic in greater depth using multiple texts and other source materials.
Indicator 2A
Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.
Some texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K-6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including life science, perspectives in literature, government and citizenship, and themes across cultures. Each unit lasts three weeks and contains Shared Reading, Mentor Reading, and Extended Reading texts related to the same topic; however, without using the small group Knowledge Building texts, which cannot be guaranteed for all students, students do not read enough texts to build knowledge of the unit topics.
Some texts are connected by a grade-level appropriate topic. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read/listen and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, texts are organized around the topic, “Investigating the Past.” The texts help students to answer the Essential Question, “How does understanding the past shape the future?” as they [r]ead and understand how texts are organized around primary sources. The Enduring Understandings for the unit are: “Primary sources include firsthand accounts, photographs, writings, maps, and artifacts. Primary sources help people learn about history and understand what life was like in the past. People search for artifacts and fossils in order to better understand the past. Understanding and learning from the past helps people better plan for the future.”
In Week 3, Day 3, students read the story A Dinosaur Named Sue by Terri Patterson. The teacher poses questions that require students to use their knowledge of shades of meaning to focus on Enduring Understanding 2: “People search for artifacts and fossils in order to better understand the past.” and Enduring Understanding 3: “Understanding and learning from the past helps people better plan for the future.” Students reread paragraph 7 and answer the question, “Explain the difference between the words hard, skillful, and careful. Describe how the sentences ‘Our hard and skillful work over the past few days finally paid off’ and ‘Then we had to be even more careful” help you to visualize how the team worked.’
In Week 3, Day 5, in the Engage Thinking section of Culminating Task: Design a Time Capsule, the teacher tells students that “yesterday they did the first part of their culminating task, designing a time capsule. Today, they will reflect on the task and the unit’s Essential Question, and Enduring Understandings.”
In Unit 9, texts are organized around the topic, Buyers and Sellers. The texts help students answer the Essential Question, “How do the goods we make, buy, and sell connect us?” as they “[r]ead and understand texts are organized around the economics concepts of goods and services. The Enduring Understandings for the unit are: “Goods are items that are made, bought, and sold. People use natural resources to make, or produce, goods. People make choices about what goods to buy based on their needs and wants. Producers, buyers, and sellers are all connected.” Texts in this unit include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Week 1, Day 1, the teacher plays the unit video and then asks students what they saw and heard. Then students turn to the unit opener spread, Buyers and Sellers. The teacher reads aloud the Essential Question, “How do the goods we make, buy, and sell connect us?”
In Week 3, Day 3, using the text Cherokee Art Fair by Traci Sorell during the Connect Skills to Knowledge section, the teacher poses questions for students to answer that determine the meaning of words and phrases to focus on Enduring Understanding 1: “Goods are items that are made, bought, and sold.” and Enduring Understanding 4: “Producers, buyers, and sellers are all connected.”
In Week 3, Day 4, students read the text, Cherokee Art Fair by Traci Sorell. The teacher reminds students that in the story, the character made things to sell. The teacher reminds students that when they wrote in the blueprint, they addressed Enduring Understanding 4: “Producers, buyers, and sellers are all connected.” Students complete the blueprint. Students then use the information from the Blueprint to create an advertisement for a product they would like to make and sell during the Make a Plan part of the lesson.
Examples of texts that are connected by a theme rather than a topic, include but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, texts are organized around the theme, Characters Facing Challenges. The texts help students explore the Essential Question: “What can we learn when we face problems?” The Enduring Understandings for the unit are: All stories, whether traditional or modern, have characters who face problems. Characters in stories face problems caused by internal and external challenges. Readers can build knowledge about solving problems in the real world by looking at how characters face challenges in stories. Texts in this unit include, but are not limited to the following:
In Week 1, Day 3, students listen to the story “The Foolish Milkmaid” by Aesop. In the Connect Skills to Knowledge: Turn and Talk section, the teacher reminds students of Enduring Understandings 2 and 3 from the Knowledge Blueprint: “Characters in stories face problems caused by internal and external challenges. Readers can build knowledge about solving problems in the real world by looking at how characters face challenges in stories.” Students discuss what internal and external problems Molly had and what problem Molly faced that the students can relate to.
In Week 2, Day 4, students read “Yeh-Shen” retold by Yuanyuan Gu. In the Connect Skills to Knowledge: Turn and Talk section, the teacher reminds students of Enduring Understandings 1 and 3 from the Knowledge Blueprint: “All stories, whether traditional or modern, have characters who face problems. Readers can build knowledge about solving problems in the real world by looking at how characters face challenges in stories.” Students discuss what challenges the characters face in “Yeh-Shen” and how Yeh-Shen’s challenges help you learn about different ways to solve problems in the real world.
In Week 3, Day 3, students read “Great Girls Contest” by Mattie Harper. In the Connect Skills to Knowledge:Turn and Talk section, the teacher reminds students of Enduring Understandings 2 and 3 from the Knowledge Blueprint: “Characters in stories face problems caused by internal and external challenges. Readers can build knowledge about solving problems in the real world by looking at how characters face challenges in stories.” Students discuss the types of challenges Willow faced in the story and what knowledge can be built from this story and applied in the real world.
In Unit 6, texts are organized around the theme, Other Cultures. The texts help students answer the Essential Question, “What can different cultures teach us?” as they “[r]ead folktales in a range of styles with diverse cultures, and written by authors from the culture.” The Enduring Understandings for the unit are: “Storytelling is a very old tradition shared by many cultures around the world. People tell stories to entertain, educate, and share ideas. There are common themes, or central messages, that can be found in folktales across many cultures. Readers can build knowledge and understanding about different cultures and traditions, and learn valuable lessons from folktales.” Texts in this unit include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Week 1, Day 1, students read the story Tales to Live By by Grace Lin. The teacher reads aloud the Essential Question, “What can different cultures teach us?” Students quickly jot or sketch their initial response to the Essential Question on a piece of paper.
In Week 3, Day 3, students read the story Why the Sky is Far Away by Grace Lin. In the Connect Skills section, the teacher reminds students of Enduring Understanding 1: “Folktale shares a message about how something in nature happened or came about. Storytellers shared a message about the importance of not being greedy.” Students discuss why they think the sky is angry.
In Week 3, Day 4, students read the story Why the Sky is Far Away by Grace Lin. The teacher reminds students of Enduring Understanding 4: “Readers can build knowledge and understanding about different cultures and traditions, and learn valuable lessons from folktales.” Students talk with a partner about what they learned.
Indicator 2B
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2b.
Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts and across multiple Mentor, Read-Alouds, Shared Readings, and Extended Reads according to grade-level standards. Students use key ideas from the text to describe characters. Students compare characters, the illustrations, organization, and descriptions in multiple texts.
For most texts (read-aloud texts K–1 and anchor texts Grade 2), students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, after rereading How Beetle Got Its Gorgeous Coat by Elena del Pino, students work in small groups to answer the questions: “How do the rat and beetle respond to the idea of having a race? Why? What does the rat think during the race? Describe how the rat responds to what happens at the end of the race. Describe how the beetle responds at the end of the race? What does this tell you about her character?”
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 2, after reading The Oregon Trail, a series of diary entries from a young girl named Edith, students identify the key ideas of each diary entry by answering the questions: “Who is the author of the diary? What is the main focus of Edith’s diary entry dated May 17, 1849? Who is Edith traveling with? What is the diary entry for June 29, 1849 mainly about? Why is ‘The Oregon Trail’ a good title for this selection? How do Edith’s diary entries help you understand the past?”
In Unit 10, Week 2, Day 4, after reading States of Matter: Matter Changes in Many Ways by Jay Brewster, students answer the following key detail prompt: “Reread paragraph 4. The text says, ‘Gasses expand, or spread out, to fill the container they are in.’ Why did the author include this detail? Cite specific text evidence to support your answer.”
For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher models identifying, underlining, and analyzing how repeating words and phrases add rhythm and meaning in the story. Then, the teacher asks partners to reread paragraphs 5–6 and underline the repeated phrase in each paragraph. Students discuss which words are repeated and why they think the author repeats them. The teacher provides the following prompts to help students identify and analyze the phrases: What does each blind man say? Why do you think the author repeats these words? How does this repetition help you understand the story? The teacher allows students time to reread and annotate their texts. Then, the teacher guides them to understand that the five blind men all touched the elephant, but felt different parts, so they imagined the elephant in different ways. The teacher facilitates a conversation about how the author uses repetition in this story to explain how the five blind men imagined the elephant differently based on what each felt.
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 4, students use the text A Foxy Garden by Jeffrey B. Fuerst and analyze differences in the points of view of characters and the impact that has on the text. Students answer the following questions: Reread paragraphs 15-16. How is Bear’s point of view about the crops different from Fox’s? Cite evidence to support your answer. Reread paragraph 22. How and why has Bear’s point of view changed since the beginning of the story. Cite evidence to support your answer.
In Unit 8, Week 2, Day 4, students reread Wind and Water Change Earth by Louise Carroll. The teacher poses questions that require students to use their knowledge of identifying the main purpose of a text. For example: Reread the section “How Can We Control Water and Wind?” What key details in this section support the author’s main purpose? How does this add to your understanding of the main purpose of the selection? Use text evidence to support your ideas.
Indicator 2C
Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high-quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2c.
Materials contain coherently sequenced text-dependent questions and tasks that require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas across both individual and multiple texts. Students use the text explicitly to answer questions during the lessons and related tasks. Text-dependent questions and tasks include mentor read-aloud, extended read-aloud, short reads, and anchor text read-aloud. In addition, students use the Knowledge Blueprint to build on their knowledge from the texts while answering purposeful text-dependent questions and applying their reading to the Enduring Understandings of the unit.
Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 1, Week 1, Day 5, students use the text Postcards from Alex by Antonio Martinez. The teacher models how the settings and events fit into the overall structure of the story in the beginning and middle of the story. During the Guided Practice section, students complete an Annotate, Pair, Share during which they read and annotate the text while finding answers to three text-dependent questions. Questions include: “How would you summarize the events in the middle of the story? How does the end of the story provide a solution to Alex’s problem? How is the solution to Alex’s problem at the end of the story related to the essential question, ‘How do living things get what they need to survive?’”
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 4 students read the story Yeh-Shen by Yuanyuan Gu and use their knowledge of the illustrations and text to respond to the following questions: “What challenges do the characters face in ‘Yeh‑Shen?’ How do Yeh‑Shen’s challenges help you learn about different ways to solve problems in the real world?” Students also work with a partner to answer the question, “How well do the illustrations on pages 14–15 support how the festival is described in the story?” One student orally states ideas while the other student writes down the response. Students must cite one detail from the text and one from the illustration to support their answer.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 5 students use the text Primary Sources by Margaret McNamara to explain how images contribute to and clarify a text. During a Small Peer Group Constructive Conversation, students “[r]eread the section ‘Paintings and Photographs’ on pages 13–14. Then review the images on pages 13–14. Explain how the images help you better understand why paintings and photographs are considered good primary sources for topics from the past. Cite specific examples from the images and words to support your answer.” During the Apply Understanding portion of the text students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the following question: “Which image from this selection contributed the most to your understanding of the value of primary sources? Cite evidence from the illustrations and text to support your thinking.”
Sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 4, students compare and contrast characters and how they respond to major events and challenges in a story using, Great Girls’ Contest by Mattie Harper and Yeh-Shen retold by Yuanyuan Gu. Students answer the following text-dependent question: Explain how Willow’s response to receiving new basketball shoes is similar to Yeh-Shen’s response to receiving new gold slippers. How is it different? Cite evidence from both texts to support your answer.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 4 students use the texts Two Famous Inventors and Robots Go to School by Kathy Kafer to compare and contrast key points in two texts on the same topic. During Small Peer Groups, students engage in a Constructive Conversation to answer text-dependent questions: “How do school robots help students who can’t go to school? How do they help teachers and classmates? Based on what you read, how do you think school robots could be improved?” Then, students share their thoughts with the class. During the Apply Understanding portion of the lesson, students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the following prompt: “Reread paragraph 4 of ‘Two Famous Inventors’ and paragraphs 1–3 of ‘Robots Go to School.’ How are Thomas Edison’s inventions—the phonograph and the first movie camera—different from the school robot?”
In Unit 9, Week 2, Day 5 students listen to the texts From Tree to Baseball Bat by Matt Smith and From Pine Tree to Pizza Box by Amy and Richard Hutchings and compare and contrast the most important points in two texts on the same topic. The teacher tells students how to compare the texts to find similarities and differences. Then students work in Small Peer Groups to use the strategy to answer a text-dependent question about similarities between the two texts: “How are the steps in making a pizza box similar to the steps in making a baseball bat?” Students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the question discussed.
Indicator 2D
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.
Each unit includes a culminating task that incorporates texts from the unit, as well as outside sources, where appropriate. Culminating tasks include opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level reading, speaking, listening, and writing standards from the unit. Materials include culminating tasks that vary by topic throughout the year; however, the tasks do not vary in form from unit to unit.
Culminating tasks are evident across the year and multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, students create a guide to solving problems as the culminating task. Using the knowledge built across the unit where they read about characters who solve both internal and external problems, students create a guide with ideas for how to solve each type of problem. Students read, plan and write the guide, speak to present their learning to the class, and listen to peers’ presentations.
Step 1: Students identify the problems. Students look back through the texts and think about whether Molly and Gerald’s problems were internal or external, think about problems they have faced, and write about an example of internal and external problems they have faced.
Step 2: Students identify solutions. Students look back through the texts and think about how the characters' problems were solved. Students then reflect on their own internal and external problems identified previously and write possible solutions for each type of problem.
Step 3: Students plan their guide. Students revisit the problems and possible solutions from steps 1 and and decide which possible solutions to include in their guide.
Step 4: Create a guide to solving problems. Students create their guide, have a constructive conversation, and write to demonstrate knowledge.
In Unit 6, after reading different stories throughout the unit and identifying the messages of the stories, students select a character to write a letter to in order to explain how the story’s message will help them.
Step 1: Students look back through the texts, determine what the message of each story is, and think about what they have learned from each story.
Step 2: Students think about the characters by recording the story’s message, while thinking about the lesson Bear learns and how it will help him in the future.
Step 3: Students choose a character from one of the stories to write their letter to and think about how the message of the story will help the character.
Step 4: Students create their letter.
In Unit 10, students draw a still life drawing, identify the states of matter in their drawing, and write about how the objects can change states during the culminating task. Students present their report to the class, answering questions from their classmates and the teacher to show their knowledge and skills built across the unit.
Step 1: Students reflect on the week’s readings and choose a scene to draw.
Step 2: Students identify matter and its state. After looking back through the text, students think about the states of matter and revisit the scene from step 1. Students identify the objects and whether they are a liquid, solid, or gas and use this information to write the labels for their drawing.
Step 3: Students determine how matter changes. After looking back through the texts, students think about the states of matter and how matter changes. Students pick one object from their drawing and write about how the object can change.
Indicator 2E
Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2e.
Materials include a year-long plan grounded in standards alignment to support students’ writing development and proficiency. Writing lessons, tasks, and projects authentically integrate with reading, speaking, listening, and language. Writing tasks and projects include learning, practice, and application of writing skills.The majority of writing instruction is process writing, which occurs daily and includes a variety of genres. The Teacher Resource System includes models, planning organizers, protocols, sample responses, sample anchor charts, and plans to support implementation of the writing tasks and projects, as well as guidance or support for pacing writing over shorter and extended periods of time as appropriate for the grade.
Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Over the course of the year, the number of lessons for each genre include 30 lessons on narrative writing, 30 lessons on informative/explanatory writing, and 30 lessons on opinion writing.
Units 4, 7, and 10 focus on narrative writing. Students write their own narratives, nonfiction narrative letters, and acrostic poems.
Units 1, 3, 8, and 9 focus on informative/explanatory. Students write facts and details from anchor texts, informational texts using the anchor texts as models, research, create and present a multimedia presentation.
Units 2 and 5 focus on opinion writing. Students write their opinions about the characters in anchor texts and technology-related issues.
Guidance in the margins of lessons frequently includes, “Confer with a few students about their writing or drawing.” However, materials do not give specific guidance on how to support individual student’s growth in writing or how to help students achieve mastery of grade-level writing standards.
Writing instruction follows a similar format by unit: Week 1: analyzing a mentor text (if appropriate), teacher modeling to brainstorm, draft, revise, and share. Weeks 2 and 3: Student practice of the writing type: brainstorm ideas, choose topic, draft, revise and expand, writer's craft focus, edit, publish, and share. For example:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 1, the teacher models introducing the topic of an essay and writing an opening paragraph. Students discuss the model opening paragraph with partners. During independent writing time, students draft an introduction for their essay. Students share and reflect on what they wrote during independent writing time.
In Unit 9, Week 3, Day 3, the teacher creates a checklist to guide students as they rehearse their multimedia presentations with a partner. Materials provide a sample multimedia presentation checklist.
Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed lesson plans, models, and protocols for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Beginning in Grade 2, the K-6 Informal Assessments: Writing Assessments section includes rubrics and checklists for each type of writing. For example: In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, the teacher introduces the narrative writing checklist to students, explaining that “writers need to plan, organize, and revise narrative fiction. The checklist for writing narrative fiction will guide students during the writing process.”
Materials provide sample anchor charts. For example: In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher models how to use the provided chart to brainstorm ideas for a narrative writing piece. The margin includes a sample anchor chart for the narrative fiction writing process entry for teacher use.
Materials provide sample conferring prompts in the margin for the teacher to use when meeting with students. For example:
In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, students work on planning their narrative fiction writing. The teacher uses a mentor writing text to model each step of the writing process. The margins of the lesson include prompts for the teacher to use when conferring with students about their writing. Prompts include:
“Directive Feedback: Tell me about how your character feels at the beginning of the story. Then write those feelings in the first column of the chart.
Self Monitoring and Reflection: Reread your descriptions of how your characters feel at the beginning and the end of the story. How does the character change?
Validating and Confirming: Your chart is clear and I understand how the character changes from the beginning to the end of the story.”
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 2, students learn how to write acrostic poems. The Independent and Small Group Writing and Conferring chart includes feedback for teacher use as students analyze and begin to write their own poetry. The directions and feedback include, “As students write independently, monitor their progress and provide feedback as needed to support students’ analyses.
Directive Feedback: Notice words the poet uses more than once. Think about whether or not the lines are the same length.
Self-Monitoring and Reflection: Do you see repeated words or sound words? What is the topic of the poem?
Validating and Confirming: You answered the questions in your chart. Now think about a possible topic for your own poem.”
The additional resources and materials for each unit include graphic organizers and note-taking guides. For example: In Unit 5, the additional materials include an opinion essay writing checklist, an opinion essay features chart, and a guide to brainstorm a solution.
Indicator 2F
Materials include a progression of research skills that guide shared research and writing projects to develop students' knowledge using multiple texts and source materials.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.
Materials include research projects sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills. Students participate in seven research and inquiry projects over the course of the year. Each project provides an opportunity for students to confront and analyze different aspects of a unit topic in greater depth using multiple texts and other source materials. Students apply reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Projects become progressively more challenging and ensure students acquire deep topic knowledge. Shared research and writing projects encourage students to develop knowledge and understanding of a topic using texts and other source materials. The research project routine includes selecting a research focus, identifying relevant information from unit selections, identifying sources for additional information, planning, creating, presenting, reflecting, and responding to the information. Through the research projects, students synthesize and analyze grade-level readings and develop their knowledge of grade-level topics. Materials include teacher guidance for each step of the project to guide students toward mastery.
Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Guidance for the Research and Inquiry Projects for each task includes six mini-lessons focused on the following topics: Choose, Explore, Interpret, Create, Present, and Reflect.
Step 1: Choose: The focus of this mini lesson is on choosing a topic. The teacher introduces the project, sets a purpose, guides topic choice, introduces the Research and Inquiry Project Tool, sends off, and wraps up.
Step 2: Explore: The focus of this mini lesson is on students generating questions and gathering sources. The teacher sets a purpose, guides question design and source selection, sends off, and wraps up.
Step 3: Interpret: The focus of this mini lesson is on researching and taking notes. The teacher sets a purpose, guides research and fact gathering, sends off, and wraps up.
Step 4: Create: The focus of this mini lesson is on designing and constructing the research project. The teacher sets a purpose, guides design and creation, sends off, and wraps up.
Step 5: Present: The focus of this mini lesson is on sharing and building knowledge together. The teacher sets a purpose, guides preparing and presenting, sends off, and wraps up.
For example, in Unit 1, Mini Lesson 1, the teacher introduces the project’s goals with students: to choose a plant or animal habitat, research the topic, create a poster, and share with others. The teacher guides the topic choice during a think aloud using the Talk, Jot, Choose strategy. After introducing the project tool, students complete the Talk, Jot, Choose strategy to select their topic. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models writing guiding questions and finding sources for the poster project during a think aloud using the Question, Search, Decide Strategy. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot Strategy. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and creating the poster during a think aloud using the Read, Design, Create strategy. The teacher models reading over notes, sketching out a plan, and making the poster. In Mini Lesson 5, the teacher models guiding and presenting the research project during a think aloud using the Plan, Present, Ask strategy. In Mini Lesson 6, the teacher models assessing and self-reflecting on the research process during a think aloud using the Question, Remember, Job Strategy.
Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge on a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Knowledge Blueprint in which the teacher gathers information related to the Enduring Understandings for the unit. While reading each text, the teacher and students work together to add information to the Blueprint. The information added to the Blueprint builds over the course of each three-week unit, allowing students to build knowledge on the unit topic from various sources. The Blueprint also contains critical vocabulary that is used and referenced various times throughout the unit during discussions and writing tasks.
For each Research and Inquiry Project, materials include a Strategy bank tools that explains the various strategies included in the mini lessons, such as Talk, Jot, Choose; Question, Search, Decide; Read, Interpret, Jot; Read, Design, and Create; Plan, Present, and Ask; and Question, Remember, Jot. Additional teacher supports provide guidance on making time for research and inquiry, how to group students, flexible grouping to promote learning, and addressing the needs of multilingual learners.
Materials provide Think-Speak-Listen Bookmarks that include questions to guide discussions.
Materials include a teacher rubric that addresses the following areas: Content, Presentation, and Effort and Collaboration. Materials also include student-friendly versions of the rubrics.
Materials include shared research projects to help develop students’ research skills. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., read a number of books on a single topic to produce a report; record science observations).
In Unit 2, during the Research and Inquiry Project, students research a fable or a folktale of their choice. First, students talk about the fables and folktales. Then they think about the characters and the challenges they face. Finally, students look at the ideas and choose one to focus on. After students research a folktale or fable of their choice, they make a chart with the information they found as a visual way to show facts and details about how characters explore challenges in a tale.
In Units 5 and 6, during the Research and Inquiry Project, students research an invention to find out how, when, and why it was invented. After selecting an invention to research, students explore magazines, books, and websites to learn more about the invention and answer their questions. Students must find at least three credible and reliable sources. Then, students interpret and select facts that show why their selected invention was important and how it changed lives, and consider how the invention might be changed in the future to become even better. Students finish their research and inquiry project by creating a research report, which could be in the format of a written or typed report, a poster, a web page, or a pamphlet. Students present their report to the class then reflect on what they learned about the good and what went well and what they would do differently next time as a researcher.
In Units 7 and 8, during the Research and Inquiry Project, students choose a person or event from history that interests them. Then, students research, plan, create, and share a history research report. In addition to facts and details about a person or event from the past, the research report should also include visuals and audio, such as photographs, maps, charts, or a recording of a speech.
Criterion 2.2: Coherence
Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.
Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Materials provide implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules for pacing, including a one-page K–2 Phonics Scope and Sequence document. Materials include 150 days of lessons, which should reasonably fit into a 180-day school year; however, materials do not include guidance on when to give assessments. Although daily instructional components contain suggested time frames, the suggested times are not feasible and often include 4–5 mini-lessons per day with four or more components in each mini-lesson.
Indicator 2G
Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria of Indicator 2g.
Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Students have opportunities to answer questions about illustrations, plot, and characters. Students practice activities such as comparing and contrasting charts, retelling details, and answering standards-aligned questions about texts. At times, students focus on comprehension strategies that may not align to standards. Although the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart illustrates when standards repeat across the year, it is unclear which learning target aligns to the instructional content and questions and tasks within each lesson.
Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are taught in the school year according to the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart. Materials use general learning goals rather than CCSS, which sometimes focus on skills that are implied within the standards. It is unclear which portions of the lesson align to the learning goals listed.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 2, the teacher reads aloud the title and first paragraph of Smoke Jumpers by Matt Bander. The teacher then models how students identify the main topic of the entire selection and the focus of the first paragraph. The teacher then reads aloud paragraph 2 and models how to find the focus of the paragraph. This instruction aligns to RI.2.2: “Identify the main topic of a multiparagraph text as well as the focus of specific paragraphs within the text.”
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 3, the teacher reads the story “Village of the Moon Rain” by Grace Lin and demonstrates “how to use the words to understand the setting.” The teacher also models “how to make a connection between the text and illustration to understand the characters and events.” This instruction aligns to RL.2.7: “Use information gained from the illustrations and words in a print or digital text to demonstrate understanding of its characters, setting, or plot.”
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 5, students read the poem, “Wind and Water Change Earth, Weather” by Tracy Owen. Students close their eyes and listen to the poem. The teacher explains the meaning of onomatopoeia and repetition. The teacher models identifying both within the text. This instruction aligns to RL.2.4: “Describe how words and phrases (e.g., regular beats, alliteration, rhymes, repeated lines) supply rhythm and meaning in a story, poem, or song.”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Most questions and tasks align to Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Within the lessons, it is unclear which questions and tasks align to the learning goals listed.
In Unit 1, Week 2, Day 2, students identify the key details in the story “Habitats Around the World” by Thea Feldman. Students respond to the following question: “What is the main focus of paragraph 4. What is the main focus of paragraph 6? Why is ‘Habitats Around the World’ a good title for this selection? How does this selection relate to the essential question, ‘How do living things get what they need to survive?’” These questions align to RI.2.2: “Identify the main topic of a multiparagraph text as well as the focus of specific paragraphs within the text.”
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 5, student partner groups reread paragraphs 3–8 in “Can You Sew a Flag Betsy Ross?” by Cindy Peattie. Then, students answer the following questions to explore the differences in characters’ points of view: “What does General Washington feel the new country needs? Why? How does Betsy Ross feel about the stars in the flag? How is that different from General Washington’s idea shown in his sketch? What conclusions can you draw about Betsy Ross’s point of view from the way she makes the flag?” These questions align to RL.2.6: “Acknowledge differences in the points of view of characters, including by speaking in a different voice for each character when reading dialogue aloud.”
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, students read paragraphs 2–4 of “The Huemul Egg” retold by Carlos Labbe. After reading, students discuss and underline details that help them understand the central message. Students then respond to the following questions: “How does the author introduce the main character of this folktale? What problem does Pedro face at the beginning of this story? How does Pedro decide to solve the problem? Why? What happens in the middle of the story as a result of Pedro’s actions? Describe what happens to the greedy man at the end of the story. In your own words, what is the central message of this tale? How can you apply the central message to your classroom community?” These questions align to RL.2.2: “Recount stories, including fables and folktales from diverse cultures, and determine their central message, lesson, or moral.”
Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each Unit has two weekly assessments and one unit assessment. The weekly assessments include “selected response items, consisting of multiple choice, multiple response, evidence-based selected response, and hot text questions.” The unit assessments include two types of open responses: short answer constructed responses and an extended response writing prompt. Materials include answer keys and item rationales that indicate the standards addressed by each question.
In Unit 4, Week 2, Assessment, students read the story “The Turtle Who Talked Too Much” (author not cited). Questions 4 and 5 are as follows: “What do the cranes do when Turtle asks for help? Choose two answers. What is the message of this story?” These assessment questions align to RL.2.2: “Recount stories, including fables and folktales from diverse cultures, and determine their central message, lesson, or moral.”
In Unit 5, Unit Assessment, students read “Louis Braille” (author not cited). Question 1 is as follows: “What is the purpose of this text?” Question 8 is as follows: This assessment question partially aligns to RI.2.6: “Identify the main purpose of a text, including what the author wants to answer, explain, or describe.”
In Unit 9, Unit Assessment, students read “From Sheep to Sweater” (author not cited); the text includes four supporting illustrations. Students respond to Question 3: “What information does picture 1 add to the passage?” This assessment question aligns to RI.2.7: “Explain how specific images (e.g., a diagram showing how a machine works) contribute to and clarify a text.”
By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
RL.2.4 is taught in Units 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 according to the reformatted Correlation to the Common Core State Standards Chart: “Describe how words and phrases (e.g., regular beats, alliteration, rhymes, repeated lines) supply rhythm and meaning in a story, poem, or song.”
In Unit 1, Week 3, Day 2, students apply their knowledge of context clues and word meaning when reading “Filiberto in the Valley” by Alex Branger. During the Constructive Conversation: Partner activity, students reread the first paragraph of the text, underline the phrase “escaped from his cage,” and discuss and write about how the author’s use of this phrase helps them understand Filiberto. Students do not examine rhythm during this lesson.
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 2, students read “The Blind Man and the Elephant” retold by Sunita Apte. The teacher rereads the first three paragraphs of the text, underlines the repeating phrase “An elephant is like….”, and models how to use the repeated phrases to understand the rhythm and meaning of the story. During the guided practice activity, students work with a partner and reread paragraphs 5–6, underline the repeated phrase in each paragraph, and discuss which words are repeated and why they think the author repeats the words.
In Unit 5, Week 3, Day 5, the teacher reads aloud the poem “Eletelephony” by Laura E. Richards and models how to analyze rhyme using the Features of Poetry Anchor Chart created during Unit 1. After reading lines 3–4, the teacher discusses the rhyme and rhythm of the poem, including the line break and rhyme scheme. During Guided Practice, students read lines 9–10, “identify the rhyming words and clap to the beat,” and “discuss how rhyme and regular beats [are] used in the poem.” Students do not examine meaning during this lesson.
RI.2.8 is taught in Units 2, 5, and 8 according to the reformatted Correlation to the Common Core State Standards Chart: “Describe how reasons support specific points the author makes in a text.” While students identify reasons that support points made by the author, students do not always describe how reasons support specific points.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, after modeling how to analyze an opinion prompt, the teacher uses the Mentor Opinion Essay to “[d]iscuss one of the points the author makes and reasons that support it.” During Guided Practice, students work with a partner and “reread the Mentor Opinion Essay to locate and describe additional reasons and examples from the text that support the points the writer stated in the opinion essay.”
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 2, during the Constructive Conversation: Small Peer Group activity, students read “Two Famous Inventors” by Margaret McNamara and respond to the following text evidence questions: “What is the main focus of paragraph 3? What reasons does the author give to support her point? What is the main focus of paragraph 7? What reasons does the author give to support her point? Why is ‘Two Famous Inventors’ a good title for this selection? How does reading this selection help you to answer the Essential Question: ‘Where do ideas for inventions come from?’”
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 5, the teacher uses the first two paragraphs of “Water’s Awesome Wonder” by Sarah Brien to model how to identify an opinion and supporting statements. During Guided Practice, students work in small groups to reread the text and respond to the following text evidence questions: “What is weathering? What is erosion? How does the author support the point that something beautiful can be created by weathering and erosion? Which details back up the author’s opinion that the Grand Canyon is beautiful? How do the reasons the author gives support the point that water can be an artist?”
Indicator 2H
Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria of Indicator 2h.
Materials provide implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules for pacing, including a one-page K–2 Phonics Scope and Sequence document. Materials include 150 days of lessons, which should reasonably fit into a 180-day school year; however, materials do not include guidance on when to give assessments. Although daily instructional components contain suggested time frames, the suggested times are not feasible and often include 4–5 mini-lessons per day with four or more components in each mini-lesson. The individual components of lessons, the quantity of mini-lessons to provide teacher-directed instruction, and the time for student practice are not practical and cannot be completed within the daily literacy block. Optional materials provided do not distract from the core learning; rather, optional materials enhance core learning as it aligns to the content, strategies, and skills taught in the unit. Materials include support in the lesson margins for teacher use when supporting learners at various levels of understanding.
Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Additional Resources, materials include a K–2 Phonics Scope and Sequence document. This one-page overview outlines the phonics skills for the grade level, broken down by Unit and Week.
Each unit includes a Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge scope and sequence, which shows which strategies and skills are taught each week and which ones are assessed at the end of the unit. There are also intervention and reteaching resources for teachers to use to support core instruction.
The Components at a Glance for each unit outlines the time frame for the read-aloud, shared reading, phonics mini-lessons, reading and vocabulary mini-lessons, small-group reading, and writing and language mini-lesson.
Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include 150 days of core instruction, including 10 topic- and thematic-based units. Each unit lasts three weeks, and each instructional week contains five days of instruction. Materials also include an optional 20-day Foundations and Routines unit at the beginning of the year.
Three pacing options are provided: 150 minute literacy block, 120 minute literacy block, and a 90 minute literacy block.
150 minute literacy block: Read Aloud (15 minutes); Phonics and Word Study (30 minutes); Reading to Build Knowledge and Vocabulary including whole group instruction, small group, and independent reading and conferring (65 minutes); and Writing and Grammar including whole group instruction and independent writing and conferring (40 minutes).
120 minute literacy block: Read Aloud (10 minutes); Phonics and Word Study (30 minutes); Reading to Build Knowledge and Vocabulary including whole group instruction, small group, and independent reading and conferring (50 minutes); and Writing and Grammar including whole group instruction and independent writing and conferring (30 minutes).
90 minute literacy block: Phonics and Word Study (25 minutes); Reading to Build Knowledge and Vocabulary including whole group instruction, small group, and independent reading and conferring (40 minutes); and Writing and Grammar including whole group instruction and independent writing and conferring (25 minutes).
The Comprehensive Literacy Planner for each unit includes time frames for specific components of daily lessons and individual activities, and materials specify timing for the literacy block. A typical lesson may include a read-aloud (10 minutes); metacognitive, comprehension, vocabulary, grammar and language, and phonics and word study mini-lessons (30-40 minutes); small-group reading, independent reading and conferring (no time suggestion given); writing and language mini-lessons (20 minutes); independent writing and conferring (no time suggestion given); and assessment (no time suggestion given).
In Unit 5, Week 1, Day 4, the lesson includes Phonics and Word Study (10–15 minutes) including read multisyllabic words (5–7 minutes), decode by analogy (3–5 minutes), read for fluency and transfer (2–3 minutes), and small group instruction (10–15 minutes); Short Read 2 mini-lesson on distinguishing between important and unimportant information to build knowledge (20 minutes) and explain how images contribute to and clarify a text (15 minutes); and Process Writing (15 minutes). Materials do not include time for small group reading/independent reading and conferring, independent writing and conferring, or assessment.
Materials do not provide guidance on utilizing instructional days that have not been allotted for instruction or when to administer assessments. It is unclear if assessments should be administered on their own instructional day or in lieu of instruction.
Optional materials and tasks do not distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, the small group reading section of the Comprehensive Literacy Planner notes that the teacher could choose to use decodable readers or reader’s theater scripts to build fluency.
The small group reading and writing portion of the Components at a Glance section suggests that students spend 15–20 minutes with the teacher daily in small groups. Materials also suggest specific leveled texts that relate to the unit topic or theme and include teacher guides and text-evidence question cards.
Each unit includes an Additional Materials section that includes models, charts, graphic organizers, spelling word lists, videos, and Reader’s Theater texts. These resources can be used for extra practice with core content, individualized learning, or small-group time.
The Unit Resources section contains a document titled Intervention and Reteaching Resources; the Unit Components at a Glance document references this document. The document includes teacher guidance on specific resources that can be used in small groups to target specific skill and strategy deficits that students may have. The Intervention and Reteaching Resources document also includes Quick Check Assessments to monitor students’ progress.
Optional materials and tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Small group instruction time allows the teacher to work with small groups or individual students on re-teaching. Students who are not working with the teacher work on independent tasks, during this 15–20 minute block of time.
The Unit Components at a Glance document contains teacher guidance on optional activities for students to complete during Small Group Reading Instruction/Independent Reading and Conferring.
The Teacher Resource System liberally includes teacher tips and notes on differentiation. Options include reminders or activities to include in the moment to enhance core instruction and suggestions for Independent/Partner work time.
The Additional Resources section of the Teacher Resource System includes a Recommended Trade Books section, which lists numerous books that expand on the unit concepts and essential questions. The guidance on the document notes that these texts should be used during Read-Aloud time in the classroom; however, it is important to note that the 90-minute sample literacy block does not contain a Read-Aloud time. The 120- and 150-minute sample literacy blocks contain a Read-Aloud time.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course.
Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Performance Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. The Program Guide includes a Supports for Exceptional Learners document which provides detailed guidance for teachers when supporting the diverse learning needs of English learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that contains the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Students have some opportunities to read and view materials and assessments that depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA.Materials integrate technology, including interactive tools, such as eBooks and interactive learning games, and virtual manipulatives/objects, such as ePocket charts, in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards.The visual design of the materials is not distracting and supports student learning and engagement, and the layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition. Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. Materials include a Home/School Connections letter for each unit which can be found in the Home-School section of the digital platform. The letter is available in six languages and explains the knowledge building concept and includes activities for families to do, but it does not include information about the ELA skills and strategies students will work on in the unit. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment. Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students. They have information around the ancillary materials, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
For example, In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 2, in the Identify Main Topic and Key Details section, the teacher is provided with information on what they should display and the focus of the lesson with a suggestion of what to say to open the lesson.
For example, In Unit 7, Week 3, Day 4, in the Constructive Conversation: Small Peer Group part, the teacher is told to have students open the story A Dinosaur Named SUE. The teacher, “explains that today students will work in small groups to reread the text and answer a Close Reading question. Display and read aloud the prompt.”
Materials include sufficient and useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, in the unit opener there is a heading around building knowledge goals. The information identifies what the purpose of the lesson is.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 2, in the Share and Reflect section, the teacher is prompted to, “have groups explain how images and words help them better understand a text. Invite one or more students to share their ideas with the rest of the class.”
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes a number of supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts:
“Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations” by Jeff Zwiers, Ed.D., an informational resource that explains the two common types of conversations that take place in the classroom and the instructional supports the materials provide to support students with those conversations
Speaking and Writing Response Protocols by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., which explains speaking or writing frame scaffolds that teachers may use as part of a gradual release model to support students with discussions and writing tasks throughout the year
Instructional Spotlights, which includes training videos on Building and Assessing Fluency, Managing an Independent Reading Program, and Instructional Tips for differentiation and small groups, foundational skills, social-emotional learning, whole group instruction, and writing
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Program Support Guide includes skills development content to support teachers with improving their foundational skills knowledge:
“Phonics and the Way to Meaning” from Phonics in Motion by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., a chapter excerpt that explains what brain research tells us, what the research means, explicit and systematic teaching, and an overview of key phonics research
The Essential Role of Metacognition in the Science of Reading by Peter Afflerbach, PhD, an article which defines metacognition and its connection to reading science research
The Teachers’ Professional Learning Library section of the PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes content to support teachers with improving their understanding of interactive writing, phonics and word study, reading assessments, and reading fluency.
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. The Program Scope and Sequence also utilizes language from the CCSS in the Weekly Skills and Strategies section for each unit across the year. The revised Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document explicitly lists the CCSS and the unit in which the standard is taught. This document also indicates primary and secondary citations for each standard, as well as where the standard is addressed in the program’s ancillary materials. The Skills Development section of the Program Support Guide includes an additional scope and sequence document. This document uses language from the CCSS, categorizes the skills and strategies addressed in the program at the unit- and week-level, and indicates when skills and strategies are first introduced and subsequently revisited.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Program Support Guide includes a Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document. This document outlines the standards in reading, writing, speaking and listening, fluency, and vocabulary, the teacher resource citations, and where that standard is addressed.
The Program Scope and Sequence includes a visual document that outlines the essential question, unit readings, weekly readings, and weekly skills and strategies across the year. The Weekly Skills and Strategies section uses language from the standards to describe the comprehension and vocabulary strategies and the grammar skills addressed. For example, in Unit 7, Week 3, one of the grammar skills listed is “Use an Apostrophe to Form Contractions,” which aligns to L.2.2c.
In the Unit Resources section of each Teacher’s Resource System, materials provide a Suggested Language Objective document that lists the connection to state content standards and WIDA language development standards. The document states the objective of what students should know and be able to do using student-friendly language.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Resources section of the Teacher’s Resource System contains a Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge document that outlines which Metacognitive Strategies, Fix-Up Strategies, and Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills students are working on, as well as the week in which the strategies and skills are taught. The document also outlines whether the skill is introduced, revisited, or assessed on the unit assessment.
Each unit contains a Learning Goals document that outlines the standards-based skills that students are working on in that unit for foundational skills, metacognitive skills, comprehension, vocabulary, writing, grammar, and speaking and listening. For example, in Unit 2, Week 3, one of the Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills listed is “Describe How Characters Respond to Major Events and Challenges,” which aligns to RL.2.3.
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Materials include a Home/School Connections letter for each unit which can be found in the Home-School section of the digital platform. The letter is available in six languages. The letter explains the knowledge building concept and includes activities for families to do, but it does not include information about the ELA skills and strategies students will work on in the unit. Activities include a Topic Connection, a Vocabulary Connection, a Comprehension Connection, and a Phonics Connection. Materials also include a Parent/Caregiver letter that can be found in the Managing Your Independent Reading Program Reproducible Resources. Guidance indicates that this letter be sent home at the beginning of the school year, as the letter informs parents about reading their child should be doing at home. The letter lists several ways to share the books with their child and it also includes suggestions for talking about the book, reading the book, and writing about the book. The Parent/Caregiver letter is also available in Spanish.
Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Home/School Connections letter that the teacher sends home. It outlines the key ideas, describes how the unit is organized, and lists the texts that the student will be reading.
Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide a Supporting Your Student Remotely Module. This resource includes “videos that guide parents on creating a learning environment.”
In Unit 6, the Home/School Connections letter suggests that parents and students select two different people, places, holidays, or objects. Then the student should describe or draw how they are alike and different.
In Unit 9, the Home/School Connections letter suggests that parents and students practice identifying steps in a process—an important reading skill—with their student by pointing out examples of procedural text in their daily lives, such as recipes and directions. Then parents should challenge their student to put the steps in order by explaining how to play their favorite game or make their favorite recipe.
The Parent/Caregiver Letter found in the Managing Your Independent Reading Program states, “You can help your child practice reading. Here are several ways to share the books with your child.” Some ways listed include, but are not limited to, “ask your child about the title and author, talk about the pictures on each page, listen as the child reads the book to you, have your child predict what might happen next and explain why, and ask your child to write or draw something about the book.”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Many of the provided components include videos and demos to support teachers with understanding the instructional approaches. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance digital platform includes a Reviewer’s Multimedia Guide to Benchmark Advance. This resource includes videos explaining the program’s instructional approaches to reading, vocabulary, writing, speaking and listening, and assessment in Grades K–2 and Grades 3–6.
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab in the Benchmark Universe platform includes several components to support teachers with understanding the various instructional approaches of the program:
The Program Overview includes short videos that explain the instructional framework of the unit topic text sets, foundational skills, reading and writing, responsive teaching, and the program’s spiral design of instruction.
The Grade 2 Program Review includes explanations and demo videos of the instructional design routines; read alouds; whole group, phonics and word study, reading, and writing mini-lessons; small group instruction; independent work time; and assessment.
The Instructional Concepts module includes explanations of the program’s approach to vocabulary development in Grades 2–6.
The Additional Resources tab in each unit includes an Instructional Routines and Strategies document. This document explains the instructional routines for read alouds, retelling, phonological awareness, blending, high-frequeny words, vocabulary, spelling, and fluency.
Materials include and reference research-based strategies.
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources include a Research Foundations module. This module explains the research that supports the program’s approach to word recognition and decoding; language comprehension which includes background knowledge and vocabulary; reading comprehension; writing, including handwriting, spelling, and composition; and assessment.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson. If the teacher needs examples of articles, texts, or resources, those items are not called out in the provided materials list; those materials are listed in the lesson details and the modeling script provided for teacher use. The Additional Materials bank for each unit details the items needed for each lesson, including but not limited to, the mentor text, writing prompts, vocabulary charts, note-taking guides, glossaries, and close reading questions. Materials also provide a bank of generic graphic organizers such as T-charts, concept maps, and Frayer Model. The Additional Materials section of the digital platform contains a digital folder that includes all of the supporting materials for each unit.
Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 7, Week 1, Day 2, the program suggests teachers have the following materials when using the mentor read-aloud The Oregon Trail: Grade 2 Language Quick Checks pages 54–55: Reference Materials Guide.
In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 5, the lesson includes a materials section that lists the texts for close reading and the pages, letters cards, and high frequency cards.
In Unit 10, Week 1, Day 2, the program suggests teachers have the following materials when using the mentor read-aloud The Art of Origami: Grade 2 Language Quick Checks pages 46–47: dictionaries (print or digital), reference material guide, root words chart, and the guided practice task.
Indicator 3G
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3H
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level. Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning and include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. Materials provide Weekly and Unit assessments in print and e-assessment format. While the e-assessments include digital tools that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessments, the print versions do not include assessment accommodations.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments and include all standards and practices for the grade or course level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Interim Assessment is administered four times a year. Interim Assessment 1 is administered twice, once as a pre-test and once as a post-test. Interim Assessment 2 assesses standards taught in Units 1–3. Interim Assessment 3 assesses standards taught in Units 1–6. The Interim Assessment includes an answer key that lists the ELA standards assessed for each item.
The Performance Task Assessments may be administered after Units 2, 5, and 8. The performance tasks are based on standards taught in previous lessons and include a writing task. The answer key includes standards for each item.
The rubrics provided to assess the Performance Task Assessment writing tasks identify the overarching Writing standard. The Evidence of Genre Characteristics and Grammar and Conventions columns of the provided rubric contain varied lists of elements for each scoring range. These lists use language from the Writing and Language sub-standards and the answer key identifies the standards assessed.
Weekly Assessments are administered at the end of each of the three weeks within each unit. The assessments include an item rationale with the standards assessed for each question.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning. Materials include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The Interim, Performance Task, Weekly, and Unit Assessments include item rationales for incorrect and correct answers. Materials provide teacher guidance for reteaching and reassessing strategies and skills.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Universe materials provide multiple methods for assessment including forms and checklist for informal assessments, Interim Assessments, Quick Checks, Weekly and Unit Assessments, and Performance Tasks.
Each unit includes two weekly assessments and one cumulative unit assessment. Each of these assessments contains an answer key and item rationale that indicates the standard being assessed for each assessment item, as well as explanations of correct and incorrect responses.
Each unit includes a Build Knowledge Evaluation Tool, a rubric designed to help teachers “evaluate students’ demonstration of knowledge gained during the unit.” This assessment tool follows a four-point scale that rates students on their knowledge blueprint, their culminating task, and how they demonstrated knowledge through writing. Each unit also includes an exemplar of student work that meets expectations for demonstration of knowledge gained.
The Language and Comprehension Quick Checks assess students on language and reading skills. Materials include two forms of each assessment, and the assessments may be administered more than once during the year. Guidance notes that the Quick Checks “are intended as formative assessments to help you monitor students’ progress and adapt instruction to individuals’ needs.”
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Overview section of the Informal Assessments guide outlines the program’s Assessment, Teaching, and Learning cycle: “Meaningful, ongoing, and multifaceted observation is the heart of the evaluation process. Since observations must occur in authentic contexts, utilize your whole-class and small-group reading time to document students’ efforts to: join collaborative conversations; ask and answer questions; react to prompts; contribute ideas for graphic organizers; process texts; problem-solve new words; apply targeted skills and strategies; act out and/or talk, draw, or write about books. Use the information you gain to differentiate instruction by developmental reading behaviors and characteristics, metacognitive and comprehension strategy needs, instructional reading levels, fluency, and vocabulary understandings.”
The Overview section of each Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide includes guidance on how to use the results from each type of assessment. Materials note that the main purpose of the Interim Assessments is “to monitor progress.” Guidance directs teachers to “look for steady progress from the beginning of the year to the end” when evaluating students’ scores. Next steps for Interim Assessments includes general suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed.” and “Reviewing a student’s assessment with the student may also be helpful. It can provide an opportunity for students to see which questions they answered incorrectly and why their answers were incorrect.” Next steps for Performance Task assessments is as follows: “After scoring a Performance Task, review each student’s results to see how well he or she performed on each part: the selected-response questions and the writing prompt. Some students will perform well on the first part but not the second, and this information can be valuable in planning further instruction. When reviewing students’ responses, you may want to refer to the state standards indicated in the Answer Keys to identify areas that require additional instruction.”
The Weekly and Unit Assessments include a section that describes ways to use the assessment results. Guidance includes suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed. For example, a student may answer questions about Key Details and Main Idea correctly but have trouble with questions that require Making Inferences or Comparing and Contrasting. Instruction for this student in the next week or following unit may require more focus on these two strategies.”
The Introduction section of the Language Quick Checks and the Comprehension Quick Checks include guidance on using the scores to provide students support. If students score between 80%–100%, the teacher should “[m]ove on to the next Quick Check or skill.” If students score between 66%–80%, guidance is as follows: “Consider administering the Quick Check again. Continue monitoring the student during future Quick Checks.” If students score below 66%, the teacher should “[u]se additional resources shown in the Resource Map to provide the student with opportunities to remediate skills.” The skills assessed in the Language Quick Checks Resource Map align to the Writing and Language Handbook, and the skills assessed in the Comprehension Quick Checks align to the Benchmark Advance Intervention Reading lessons.
Each unit includes a Small Group Texts for Reteaching Strategies and Skills document. This document lists small group texts that are aligned to the metacognitive strategies and comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency skills for each unit’s scope and sequence. The teacher may use these texts to reteach skills and strategies during small group instruction.
Each unit includes an Intervention and Reteaching Resources document. This document lists specific strategies and skills taught in the unit and guides the teacher to specific resources for reteaching, practice, and assessment of those skills.
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
Materials include assessments that measure the standards. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials provide a K-6 Informal Assessments resource. This assessment resource includes developmental checklists, independent reading observation checklists, records and checklists to use in small group instruction, retelling assessments and rubrics, and writing rubrics and checklists.
Each unit includes three assessments: a Week 1 Assessment, a Week 2 Assessment, and a Unit Assessment. The Weekly Assessments mostly include multiple choice and evidence-based selected response item types. The Unit assessments include the same item types, as well as one compare and contrast constructed response question.
Materials include Interim Assessments and Performance Task assessments. The Overview section of the Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide notes, “All of the reading questions in the Interim Assessments are selected-response items. The Grades K–1 assessments only use multiple-choice items with three answer choices. In Grades 2–6, all of the questions in the Interim Assessments and Performance Tasks consist of several different selected-response item types….Both the Interim Assessments and the Performance Tasks include an extended-response writing prompt.” Grades 2–6 Interim Assessment item types include multiple choice, multiple response, evidence-based selected response, hot text, matching, and drag and drop. The item types for Grades 2–6 Performance Tasks are as follows: “The assessment component for each grade offers three Performance Tasks: one narrative task, one informative/explanatory task, and one opinion/argumentative task. Each task has two parts. Part 1 presents two or three sources (reading passages or videos) for students to read or view and a set of three to four selected-response questions. Part 2 provides an extended-response writing prompt.”
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Materials provide Weekly and Unit assessments in print and e-assessment format. While the e-assessments include digital tools that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessments, the print versions do not include assessment accommodations. Additionally, there was no evidence of teacher guidance regarding the use of accommodations for assessments within the grade-level materials or the program support documents.
Materials offer some accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
All interim and Unit assessments are offered as eAssessments as well and tools are included for students to magnify the text or image, use a line reader, highlighter, strikethrough, and take notes. Additionally, students can increase and decrease font size and change the contrast.
Materials include some guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Additional Resources section of each unit includes an Access and Equity document that provides teachers with information about teaching Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners; however, this document primarily provides instructional routines and strategies rather than assessment accommodations.
There was no evidence of teacher guidance on the use of the provided assessment accommodations found in the materials.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The Program Guide includes a Supports for Exceptional Learners document which provides detailed guidance for teachers when supporting the diverse learning needs of English learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. The Program Guide also includes an Access and Equity document with detailed guidance on supporting students with special needs throughout the literacy block. Materials provide some extension opportunities for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level to engage with literacy content and concepts at a greater depth. Materials provide options for remediation and acceleration in the daily small group instruction block; however, whole group lessons do not include explicit extension activities. Materials contain multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem solve using a variety of formats and methods. Materials leverage the use of various formats, including discussions and presentations. Materials provide different grouping structures for students, including independent, partner, and small group structures during reading, writing, Research and Inquiry projects, and the Reader’s Theatre activities; however, materials do not provide guidance on how the teacher should choose partners for collaborative activities. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that contains the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Students have some opportunities to read and view materials and assessments that depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Materials maintain a balance of positive portrayals in representation to prevent the prevalence of negative stereotypes harmful to students; however, there are some instances where negative stereotypes and biases persist. Materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
The Program Guide includes a Supports for Exceptional Learners document which provides detailed guidance for teachers when supporting the diverse learning needs of English learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. The Program Guide also includes an Access and Equity document with detailed guidance on supporting students with special needs throughout the literacy block. Within instructional lessons, materials use a key symbol labeled Access to indicate strategies teachers may use as entry points for students who may need alternative ways to demonstrate their learning within the lessons.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document includes features of the program that support English Learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. Program supports for students with special needs include, but are not limited to, Unit Intervention/Reteaching Resources and Access Features. This support document is the same for K–6.
In the Additional Resources tab of each unit, the Access and Equity document provides general guidance on planning and delivering instruction for students with disabilities. An example of provided guidance includes: “Students may highlight, underline, or circle key parts of text using the consumable or the e-reader version. Annotated notes may be taken electronically in the e-reader version of the text. Notes may take the form of diagrams, visuals, charts, or key phrases.”
The Accommodating Students with Special Needs Throughout the Literacy Block document provides general suggestions to support students with special needs during the literacy block. Suggestions include, but are not limited to:
Provide visual cues such as photos, illustrations, gestures, and facial expressions.
Provide sentence frames.
Allow students to write or draw to express their ideas during discussions.
Based on your observations, adjust the content and pace of instruction.
Allow partner or buddy reading and discussion while creating annotated notes.
The Apply Understanding section of most lessons includes specific strategies for working with students with special needs. Materials indicate these supports using a key icon with the word Access written on the key. For example, in Unit 4, Week 3, Day 4, the Access tip states, “With prompting and support from a partner or an adult, have students answer simple questions about how the characters in “Stone Soup” and “The Stone Garden” are similar and different. If necessary, have partners listen to the stories using the interactive e‑book and then discuss the prompt orally. A scribe can record their answers.”
Indicator 3N
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
The materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. There are additional words in the lessons to challenge students during phonics instruction. Additionally, teachers have options for remediation and acceleration in the daily small-group instruction block. However, there are no explicit extension activities included within the lesson the teacher could draw from to extend the learning. Lessons do not contain regular extensions to engage in literacy for students who speak, write, read, or listen above grade-level. There is no evidence of students completing tasks different from their peers, but teachers are told to advance the progression to a more challenging skill or shorten the assignment. There are “Extend” Modifications on some of the Research & Inquiry Project, the If/Then Reinforce and Reaffirm, Additional Resources Read-Aloud Extension Activities by Linda Hoyt, and small group instruction.
Materials provide some opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials are free of instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In the Benchmark Advance 2022 Program Support Guide the guide provided broad suggestions for teachers where they can find alternative supports to provide for high ability learners.
In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 2, in the Reinforce and Reaffirm the Strategy teachers are given the following guidance: If students independently explain how the images contribute to and clarify the text...Then extend a task, time permitting: Have students explain how images contribute to and clarify their understanding of a leveled text they have previously read.
Teacher small-group resources contain leveled texts aligned to each unit topic. There are Lexile levels beyond grade level that the teacher can use with advanced learners.
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Materials contain multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem solve using a variety of formats and methods. Materials leverage the use of various formats, including discussions and presentations. Students share their thinking with the class, and write in response to their reading and conversations. While materials provide opportunities for students to reflect, self-assess their work, and receive feedback, students do not have opportunities to monitor and move their own learning.
Materials provide multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Students have opportunities to share their thinking and apply their understanding in new contexts but do not have opportunities to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Knowledge Building Song. Teachers may access the songs using the Additional Materials link within lessons or through the Sing, Swing, and Learn section of the digital platform. Lesson guidance includes, “Play the unit knowledge building song throughout the unit to help build students' knowledge and oral vocabulary. Have students participate through singing, movement, and dance.”
Each unit or unit pair includes a Research & Inquiry Project that is designed to deepen students’ knowledge of the unit topic. During the Step 1: Choose mini-lesson, students use the Talk, Jot, Choose strategy to select a research focus. During the Step 2: Explore mini-lesson, students use the Question, Search, Decide strategy to find trustworthy and reliable sources. During the Step 3: Interpret mini-lesson, students use the Read, Interpret, Jot strategy to “research and gather facts and key information about their topic.” During the Step 4: Create mini-lesson, students use the Read, Design, Create strategy to make their final product. During the Step 5: Present mini-lesson, students use the Plan, Present, Ask strategy to share their final product with their peers. Project guidance directs the teacher to choose the presentation option that works best in their classroom setting. Presentation options include whole group, small group, partnerships, filming the presentation and sharing it on a digital platform, visiting another classroom to share their presentation or inviting guests to join the classroom virtually or in person, and mailing or emailing the presentation to a local business, organization, or community center who may find displaying the project useful.
At the end of each week, students build knowledge of the unit topic as they respond to guiding questions and use information from unit texts to record what they learned about each Enduring Understanding. After completing the Knowledge Blueprint at the end of Week 3, students participate in a culminating task to demonstrate their knowledge. Culminating tasks typically entail a small group Real World Perspectives: Constructive Conversation, a very brief time to share and reflect, and an independent writing task.
Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Students use the Research & Inquiry Project Tool and their Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebooks for reflection and feedback. After selecting a research focus, students “reflect on why they chose the topic and ask themselves if this is a topic they really care about.” After students begin researching and gathering facts and information about their selected topic, they “reflect on whether the facts relate to their guiding questions.” After students present their final research and inquiry project to the class, they reflect on “how their presentation went” and what went well about their presentation. The teacher uses the Important Notes or Reminders column to provide students with feedback during each step of the Research & Inquiry Project. During the Step 6: Reflect mini-lesson, students use the Question, Remember, Jot strategy to self-assess and self-reflect on the Research & Inquiry Project process and the knowledge they gained.
The Informal Assessments manual includes opinion, informative/explanatory report, and personal narrative writing checklists for student use in Grades 2–6. Students typically self-assess their work during the final writing lesson of the unit.
Some writing lessons include an Independent and Small-Group Writing and Conferring inset. This guidance supports teachers with observing students and providing support during writing tasks. For example, in Unit 2, Week 3, Day 1, students begin writing their opinion essays. The Independent and Small-Group Writing Conferring guidance is as follows:
Directive Feedback: You can add some details to make your introduction stronger.
Self-Monitoring and Reflection: What do you want readers to know about your opinion? What can you add to get readers excited and want to keep reading?
Validating and Confirming: Your opinion and reasons are clearly stated. You also made me want to keep reading.
Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Materials provide different grouping structures for students, including independent, partner, and small group structures during reading, writing, Research and Inquiry projects, and the Reader’s Theatre activities; however, materials do not provide guidance on how the teacher should choose partners for collaborative activities. Although teachers can create small groups using the Manage Students page in the digital platform, materials do not provide grouping strategies or use weekly or unit assessment data to group students in the management system.
Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 5, In small groups, students read paragraphs 2–4, of The Huemul Egg by Carlos Labbé, to discuss and underline details that help them understand the central message.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 4, students engage in a Constructive Conversation with their small peer group to discuss their responses to a close reading prompt. Afterwards, students independently “reread the section ‘Paintings and photographs’ and examine the images and captions on pages 13–14. Describe how these images captured historical events.”
Materials provide limited guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 3, Week 2, Day 2, the students participate in an Annotate, Pair, Share activity where they work with a partner to annotate the text and answer provided questions. Materials do not provide teacher guidance on how to partner students.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 2 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document. This document contains a three column list that identifies the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. The resources listed for English Learners include supplemental materials or supports that also apply to all students, such as Suggested Language Objectives, Think-Speak-Listen Bookmarks which include sentence stems for Constructive Conversations, Language Transfer Supports, and a Multilingual Glossary. Materials include Integrated English Language Development (iELD) strategies, instructional supports that are specifically designed to help students meet or exceed grade-level standards, in the margins of the teacher-facing lesson materials for teachers. These supports include lesson-specific, multi-level strategies, sentence stems, and prompts for multilingual learners. Beginning in Grade 2, the program provides the following additional multilingual learner supports: Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, a support for reading texts; Real-World Perspectives: Supporting Constructive Conversation Handouts, a support for culminating tasks; and Addressing the Needs of Multilingual Learners and lesson-specific Multilingual Learner Supports, a support for the Research & Inquiry Projects.
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 5, students read “How the Beatle Got Its Gorgeous Coat” a folktale from Brazil retold by Elena del Pino and determine the central message of the text. The iELD supports for this lesson include sentence stems, pre-teaching vocabulary, pausing to have students answer questions using text evidence, and guiding students to develop understanding of a central theme. For example, the Light Support recommendations include the following: “Answer questions about vocabulary as partners read the text. Have partners stop after reading each paragraph and ask themselves: What does this paragraph teach me? Does it help me determine the central message? Have partners underline text evidence that helps them find the central message. Display these frames to help partners respond: I learned ___ when I read ‘___.’ This text evidence helps me determine that the central message might be ___.”
In Unit 7, Week 1 Day 3, while reading “The Oregan Trail” (author not cited), students learn about commas in greetings and closings. The iELD support for this lesson include underlining, reading and comparing different portions of the text, direct re-teaching, sentence frames, and extended re-teaching. For example, the Substantial Support recommendations are as follows: “Read the second diary entry with students. Pause after the greeting and explain: The greeting is how a letter begins. A comma comes after the greeting. After reading the closing, explain: The closing is how a letter ends. A comma comes after the closing. Help students underline the commas in the text.”
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Students have some opportunities to read and view materials and assessments that depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Materials maintain a balance of positive portrayals in representation to prevent the prevalence of negative stereotypes harmful to students; however, there are some instances where negative stereotypes and biases persist. Students do not consistently have the opportunity to see themselves succeed based on the representation of characters in the text they read throughout the units. Some texts have a balance of gender and at least two races, but often one of the two races are white characters. While some images enhance stereotypes, others proudly celebrate the non-stereotypical roles of people based on their gender.
Materials and assessments sometimes depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, the Unit Opener video largely depicts White males solving “traditional work related problems,” like fixing a bike or working on a farm. While the other characters represent different genders, they do not represent different races, cultures, or ethnicities.
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 1, the Extended Read “Primary Sources” by Margaret McNamara includes photographs of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., people in the Revolutionary Way, and people of various ethnicities.
In Unit 9, Week 3, Day 1, students read “Cherokee Art Fair” by Traci Sorell. The text depicts traditional Cherokee people and describes cultural jewelry making.
Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 5, Week 2, Day 1, the Extended Read “Two Famous Inventors” by Margaret McNamara provides information about Thomas Edison and George Washington Carver. The text describes Carver as a teacher and inventor and includes a photograph of him teaching.
Materials sometimes provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 1, the student-facing Research and Inquiry Project instructions includes an image of an African-American female student presenting to a class of White students with hands raised and a White, female teacher listening.
In Unit 3, Week 1, Day 1, the text “Smoke Jumpers” by Matt Bander contains images of White male smoke jumpers.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
Materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA. The Teacher Resource System includes a Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document; however, this document is not embedded within the daily lessons nor does it reference student home language. While the Integrated English Language Development (iELD) box within applicable lessons includes suggestions for differentiation and support, this resource does not address ways to help students incorporate their home language into their ELA learning. Although materials provide Home/School Connections letters in six different translations, the letter provides families with limited information such as the unit, vocabulary, and text students will engage with for the week; it does not present multilingualism as an assessment in reading. The Access and Equity resource does not offer guidance on leveraging home language, cultural knowledge, communities, and diversity as assets. Additionally, the suggested language objectives do not advise using a student's home language to facilitate literacy learning.
Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Informal Assessments manual includes developmental and individual reading behavior checklists, one of which is the Observation Checklist of First-Language Reading Behaviors and Experiences. This developmental checklist includes a list of six observable Literacy Behaviors and Experiences. Guidance directs the teacher to “[u]se this checklist to help you identify the level of support each of your new ELs may need.” The teacher rates each behavior or experience as yes, no, or do not know. Materials provide the following guidance to inform next steps: “If the student does not exhibit age-appropriate reading behaviors in his or her first language, you will need to provide intensive support and instruction in both English language and literacy. If the student demonstrates age-appropriate reading behaviors in his or her first language, the student is likely to make rapid literacy progress directly correlated with English-language development.” Although three of the observable behaviors and experiences address students’ home language, materials do not provide guidance or suggestions for teachers to use the home language to support students with their ELA learning. The Literacy Behaviors and Experiences are as follows:
Student has attended school on a regular basis.
Student can show how a book is read.
Student recognizes familiar illustrations and photographs from literature.
Student can read in his or her first language.
Student can write in his or her first language.
Student can find first-language cognates in English texts.
Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
Materials provide limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students' cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning and miss opportunities to capitalize on students' diverse cultural and social backgrounds. Some phonics and Grammar in Context lessons include Language Transfer Supports. Materials also provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document; however, the use of this resource within lessons is limited. Materials contain a Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspective document; however, most of the questions and guidance miss opportunities to draw upon students’ linguistic or ethnic backgrounds. Materials include some prompts during which students talk about themselves and things they like to do with friends or at home. The Access and Equity resource does not offer guidance on drawing upon students' cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. Rather, it offers general strategies such as the use of visuals (photos, diagrams with labels, illustrations), manipulatives, realia (real objects), hands-on activities, total physical response (TPR), gestures, graphic organizers, sentence frames, and other accommodations that minimize language barriers and maximize comprehension of the concepts. Sections of the materials provided in multiple languages are limited to a Multilingual Glossary and Home/School Connections letters that are offered in multiple languages. Opportunities for students to feel acknowledged during tasks based on customs of other cultures or sections of the materials provided in multiple languages are limited and lacking.
Materials make some connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make some connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include Language Transfer Supports in some phonics lessons and some Grammar in Context lessons. These supports are intended “to identify transfer issues some Els may have.” For example, in Unit 1, Week 3, Day 1, students learn about the long a sound and spelling patterns. The Language Transfer Support is as follows: “Check for transferability of phonemes and graphemes using the Contrastive Analysis in Additional Resources. The /a/ sound transfers or has an approximation in most languages (notable exception: Tagalog). The graphemes (spelling patterns) do not transfer. Practice articulation with a few simple, high-utility words and phrases, such as play, rain, and May I ___? Then have students copy the words to practice writing the letters and reading words with long a spellings.”
Materials provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document which identifies similarities and differences between English and nine other languages. This is an optional resource for teacher use to inform instruction to support students’ understanding of how English works in ways that are similar to or different from usages in their home language. The document can also serve as a scaffolding support for students. The document encourages teachers to “identify and capitalize on students’ existing language skills.” At times, the Language Transfer Supports in phonics lessons direct the teacher to “[c]heck for transferability of phonemes and graphemes using the Constrastive Analysis.”
Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
No evidence found
Materials include some equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Additional Resources tab of the Teacher Resource System includes an Access and Equity document. This document includes the following guidance: “Remember to think about the many aspects of the individual (culture, age, first language, socioeconomic level, and more). For example, wait time is both a common accommodation for students with disabilities who need additional time to process information and for English Learners who require additional time to process the second language.”
Materials include some opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Multilingual Glossary that contains the vocabulary for the unit and the option to view the word in ten other languages. Additionally, students can hear the word, definition, and a sample sentence read aloud to them by clicking on the icon.
Materials provide Home/School Connections letters in each unit. The letters are available in six different languages: English, Haitian Creole, Mandarin, Portuguese, Spanish, and Arabic.
Materials include some prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 2, Day 1, the Culturally Responsive Perspectives section of the Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document addresses grooming, as students read “Yeh-Shen,” a Chinese folktale retold by Yuanyuan Gu. Teacher guidance includes, “As a class, discuss what people do to dress up for a special occasion. Ask students to list special occasions for which a person might wear formal or special clothing, or have special hairstyles or jewelry. If you have students from other countries or regions in your class, ask them to share information about special occasions in those places.” The instructional lesson includes an inset directing teachers to “[u]se the discussion prompts on pages 164–165 to engage students and make connections to their experiences and perspectives.”
In Unit 7, Week 2, Day 1, the Culturally Responsive Perspectives section of the Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document addresses learning, as students read “Primary Sources” by Margaret McNamara. Teacher guidance includes, “ As a class, discuss how seeing real people in photos and reading their words in diaries and letters connect us to history and allow us to learn the perspectives of diverse communities. Invite students to name a person or event important in the history of their community. Also ask them to name someone from a different community who they would like to know more about.” The instructional lesson includes an inset directing teachers to “[u]se the discussion prompts on pages 164–165 to engage students and make connections to their experiences and perspectives.”
Indicator 3U
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
Materials integrate technology, including interactive tools, such as eBooks and interactive learning games, and virtual manipulatives/objects, such as ePocket charts, in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards. Materials do not include or reference digital technology that provides teachers and/or students opportunities to collaborate. The visual design of the materials is not distracting and supports student learning and engagement. The layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels. Where appropriate, materials include guidance on locating texts in the student-facing materials and provide reminders for accessing other resources to support learning. The Benchmark Universe Dashboard homepage includes a Benchmark Academy section with PD about the curriculum resources. The training tab includes Benchmark Universe How to Videos, such as Tech Talks and e-Assessment Teacher and Administrator Modules on assigning, previewing, and grading assessments as well as navigating the reports.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Materials integrate technology, including interactive tools, such as eBooks and interactive learning games, and virtual manipulatives/objects, such as ePocket charts, in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards. Digital tools allow students to annotate texts and work collaboratively in a remote setting. Some eAssessments and reports support data collection and inform instruction. The assignments portal and teacher ePlanner integrate technology to support teachers in engaging students with grade-level standards.
Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each unit contains a Unit Video and Unit Song to introduce the unit and to reinforce key vocabulary throughout the unit.
Materials include a digital ePocket Chart. This resource aligns to the foundational skills instruction students receive each week.
Materials provide an array of Interactive Learning Games. Students practice identifying sounds and high frequency words through games such as Word Builder, Balloon Pop, Matching, and Sorting.
Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials include a student-facing My Reading and Writing eBook for each unit. When using this resource, students can annotate text; text can be read aloud; and responses can be saved.
All texts can be assigned to students to read digitally. Students have the option to listen to texts being read aloud (if allowed by the teacher), annotate texts, and use tools like annotations, auto play, audio speed, insert text box, bookmark, link, notes, and zoom.
Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The ePocket Chart is customizable.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Materials have limited digital technology for student and teacher communication. Teachers can monitor students' work and progress and leave feedback and notes using digital tools built into the e-Notebook. Teacher collaboration is limited to the ability to share customized e-Book materials with other teachers at that school or in that district.
Materials include or reference some digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Teachers can monitor students' work and leave feedback or notes for individual students, in the Build-Reflect-Write e-notebooks
The Texts for Close Reading for each unit includes an e-Book that can be customized. Teachers can share customized pages of the e-Book with teachers at the same school or district.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The visual design of the materials is not distracting and supports student learning and engagement. The layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels. Where appropriate, materials include guidance on locating texts in the student-facing materials and provide reminders for accessing other resources to support learning. The student-facing materials and Teacher Resource System clearly communicate information. The Teacher Resource System consistently includes headings that signal when support is available for a specific purpose, as seen in the following section headers: Engage, Model, Guided Practice, Connect to Knowledge Turn & Talk, and Apply to Understand Build Knowledge. The My Reading and Writing eBook supports student understanding of topics, texts, and concepts. Materials are mostly free of errors.
Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials balance the use of blank space on home and landing pages in the Teacher Resource Guide, as well as in the student My Reading and Writing eBook.
Materials consistently use the same icons throughout each grade and unit, including student-facing instructional activities.
Teacher support and guidance is clearly and consistently labeled throughout units and includes Access suggestions, Integrated English Language supports, sample student responses, and sample anchor charts.
Each unit includes a Unit Opener video that supports student learning and engagement for the upcoming unit.
Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance homepage contains links to program resources, the Teacher’s Resource System, and instructional resources. Resources can be filtered by grade level and unit.
Each unit homepage contains the following tabs:
Overview, Unit Resources, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Additional Resources
Each unit section contains a drop down menu with more tabs.
The Overview section includes the following tabs: Content Knowledge Alignment, Vertical Progression of Knowledge-Building Unit Topics and Essential Questions, Author & Consultant Team, About the Program, Pacing Options and Sample Literacy Block, and Digital and Print Components.
The Unit Resources section includes the following tabs: Unit Opener, Strategies and Skills, Unit Components at a Glance, Intervention and Reteaching Resources, Guide to Text Complexity, Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives, Vocabulary Development, Pathways to Knowledge, Research and Inquiry Project, and Suggested Language Objectives.
Each Week contains a Weekly Resources tab and daily lesson tabs. Each Day contains 4–5 instructional components. The layout to access lessons is consistent within and across units.
The Additional Resources section includes the following tabs: Instructional Routines and Strategies, Additional Dictation Routine and Dictation Tasks, Constructive Conversation, Managing an Independent Reading Program, Recommended Trade Books, K–2 Phonics Scope and Sequence, Above-Level Student Supports for Phonics, Phonics Cumulative Assessments, Text Evidence/Close Reading Answe Key, Real-World Perspectives: Supporting Constructive Conversations, Small Group Texts for Reteaching Strategies and Skills, Guide to Text Complexity, Access & Equity, and Contrastive Analysis.
Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials are typically free of errors; however, materials contain some labeling and typographical errors.
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The Benchmark Universe Dashboard homepage includes a Benchmark Academy section. This section includes a PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab. The training tab includes Benchmark Universe How to Videos, such as Tech Talks and e-Assessment Teacher and Administrator Modules on assigning, previewing, and grading assessments as well as navigating the reports. The Benchmark Advance homepage includes student how-to videos on accessing assignments, navigating the digital platform, and using eBook tools and distance learning resources.
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources support teachers with understanding the program and its associated resources. The Tech Talks support teachers with navigating eBook tools and features, customizing resources, sharing and accessing customizations, assigning resources, and managing assignments.
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources and the Benchmark Advance landing pages house student how-to videos. These videos support students with accessing assignments, navigating Benchmark Universe, and using eBook tools and distance learning resources.
The Benchmark Advance homepage includes a Distance Learning Printable Packet Options section. This section includes resources to support student and parent engagement and offers educators strategies to support online student learning. Materials include a three-part video series designed to help parents support their students with the program at home. Materials also include a three-part video series for teachers to support them with starting distance learning, engaging asynchronous and synchronous small group and whole group lessons, and providing and monitoring feedback to students.
Within each unit, the Overview section includes a Digital & Print Components tab. This document outlines which items are digital and which items are print. Additionally, the document explains how the teacher can use the components to support student learning.