Benchmark Advance, 3-5
2022

Benchmark Advance, 3-5

Publisher
Benchmark Education Company
Subject
ELA
Grades
3-5
Report Release
01/01/2023
Review Tool Version
v1.5
Format
Core: Comprehensive

EdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations

Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.

Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Key areas of interest

Foundational skills are the beginning processes of reading for students in grades K–5. This score represents an average across grade levels reviewed for: print concepts, phonological awareness, phonics and word recognition, and fluency.

This score is the sum of all points available for all foundational skills components across all grades covered in the program.

The maximum available points depends on the review tool used and the number of grades covered.

Foundational Skills
24/24

This score represents an average across grade levels reviewed for: integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, and promotion of mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Building Knowledge
88/96
Our Review Process

Learn more about EdReports’ educator-led review process

Learn More

Additional Publication Details

Title ISBN
International Standard Book Number
Edition Publisher Year
Benchmark Advance 2022 Gr. 5 Classroom Package Print and Digital 1-Year 9781078689496
CLOSE

About This Report

Report for 5th Grade

Alignment Summary

The Benchmark Grade 5 materials meet the expectations of alignment to the Common Core ELA Standards. Materials include instruction, practice, and authentic application of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language work that is engaging and at an appropriate level of rigor for the grade.

5th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Meets Expectations
Gateway 3

Usability

24/25
0
15
22
25
Usability (Gateway 3)
Meets Expectations
Overview of Gateway 1

Text Quality and Complexity and Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading, and the majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text. Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners. Students engage in a variety of genres of writing tasks, and materials include explicit instruction for all grammar and usage standards for the grade level.

The Program Support Guide provides a one-page Year-Long Vocabulary Development Plan. Materials provide a consistent progression of phonics and word recognition lessons over the course of the year, including a Scope and Sequence of phonics and word recognition skills and Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Checks that assess a range of phonics and word recognition skills. Materials include explicit instruction, modeling, and student practice in all areas of fluency.

Criterion 1.1: Text Quality and Complexity

14/18

Texts are worthy of students’ time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade.

Materials support students’ advancing toward independent reading.

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. Units contain a variety of text types and genres including speeches, myth, legend, fables, drama, mystery, biographies, personal narrative, realistic fiction, historical fiction, opinion, various poetry, and informational texts based on social studies and life science concepts. Anchor texts range from 740L–1090L, with the majority of texts falling within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. Text excerpts that complement texts on the higher end of the stretch band  range in quantitative complexity from 740L–780L. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading. The anchor texts provide some range of text types, with the majority of texts being informational science or social studies texts. More varied text types are included in the small group instruction Building Knowledge Text Sets.

Indicator 1A
02/04

Anchor texts are of high quality, worthy of careful reading, and consider a range of student interests.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1a. 

While some anchor texts are of high-quality, consider a range of student interests, and support knowledge building related to the topic and unit essential question, some texts do not provide enough content, lack complexity and depth, or do not provide engaging illustrations. High-quality texts include engaging pictures, colorful illustrations, character relationships and motives, and rich vocabulary. Each unit begins with two short read paired texts and two extended reads. Some anchor texts are rich in figurative language, domain-specific vocabulary, and directly support student growth in vocabulary for the unit topic. Some anchor texts are short excerpts of larger published works and range from short reads to extended reads; however, some excerpts lack the depth for students to grow their understanding of story elements and are not of significant length to provide an engaging text for readers. Each unit concludes with a read aloud poem as the final anchor text. The poetry selections are used for one mini-lesson with the majority of poems published and written by a diverse representation of well-known poets, classic and modern. The selected poems generally do not directly support the essential question and may require additional inferences from students.

Some anchor texts are of high-quality and consider a range of student interests, are well-crafted, content rich, and engage students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 3, Days 1–4, students read a pair of opinion texts labeled “The Science of Growing Corn.” The pair includes “The Case for Keeping Corn Number 1”  by Carla Corriols and “Did Farmers of the Past Know More than We Do?’ by Verlyn Klinkenborg. This paired selection presents engaging and varied perspectives on progressive agriculture and offers two differing opinions on the best practices for farmers growing corn. 

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, Days 1–4, students read an informational speech by Justice Thurgood Marshall. “Thurgood Marshall’s Liberty Medal Speech” is a culturally relevant, high-interest complex text that shares information on citizenship and civil rights.

  • In Unit 4, Week 1, Day 4, students read the historical fiction text “Gold Country,” an excerpt from Staking a Claim: The Journal of Wong Ming-Chung, A Chinese Miner by Laurence Yep. This text includes photographs of the historical time period. The text uses descriptive language and a first person narrative that engages the reader and helps them to build understanding of the time period.

  • In Unit 6, Week 2, Day 1, students read the historical fiction text “The Law of Club and Fang,” an excerpt from The Call of the Wild by Jack London. The text includes colorful illustrations and rich language. The story is engaging for readers.

  • In Unit 7, Week 2, Days 1–4, students read “The Eighteenth of April,” an excerpt from Johnny Tremaine, a Newbery Award winning novel by Esther Forbes. The text is of high interest and relevant to students as it depicts the American Revolution through the eyes of a teenage boy. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 3, Days 1–3, students read the informational science text "Questions and Answers About Oceans" by Climate Kids/Michelle Pekko-Seymoure. This text is of high quality and contains rich academic vocabulary. It is also a topic of high interest as it focuses on different facts about the ocean. This informational science text is age-appropriate, contains vibrant illustrations, and is engaging.

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Days 1–2, students read the biography "Marie M. Daly: Biochemistry Pioneer" by Drake Conyers. This biographical text is of high quality as it contains rich content, vibrant illustrations, and a potential topic of high interest as it explores the life of the first African-American woman to earn a PhD in chemistry. 

Some of the anchor texts are not high-quality, well-crafted, content rich and engaging for students at their grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 5, students complete a 15 min-read read aloud of a brief excerpt of the narrative poem "Casey at the Bat" by Ernest Lawrence Thayer. While the text contains some academic vocabulary and figurative language, the excerpt only depicts the first time Casey misses the ball and does not support the anchor texts in the unit. 

  • In Unit 4, Week 2, Day 1, students read the historical fiction text “I Speak Spanish Too” by Maria Mahia. The story simplifies events in history (and today) to create a feel good story.

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, Day 4, students read an excerpt of the play “Brushfire” by David Boelke. The excerpt is too short to give it depth so that students can grow their understanding of the characters and their desires. Materials do not designate from what greater work this is an excerpt nor does it highlight the author. The lack of depth limits the worthiness of the text for students. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, Days 1–2, students read a brief excerpt from Mary Osborne’s prose version of The Odyssey by Homer. This very brief selection contains some academic vocabulary and figurative language, but it also requires additional knowledge of Greek mythology or the adventures of Odysseus to fully engage with the selection. It is too short of a passage for this to support student knowledge building or engagement. 

Indicator 1B
04/04

Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1b. 

Each of the 10 units contain a variety of text types and genres including speeches, myth, legend, fables, drama, mystery, biographies, personal narrative, realistic fiction, historical fiction, opinion, various poetry, and informational texts based on social studies and life science concepts. Across the core texts for all units, there is a 54/46 balance of literary and informational texts. This does not include the read aloud poem at the end of each unit because the lesson and tasks associated are not directly connected to the unit purpose or skills.  The majority of units provide mixed text types for students to cross-reference. Units 2, 4, 6, 9, and 10 fully focus on either informational or literary texts. 

Materials reflect the distribution of text types/genres required by the grade- level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, the short read text is an opinion piece, The Past and Future of a Crop by Amelia Millilo. 

  • In Unit 2, during small group instruction, students read the realistic fiction text Dad Came Home by Latoyoua Topping.

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, the short read text is a speech, “President Lyndon Johnson’s Voting Rights Address,”by President Lyndon Johnson 

  • In Unit 4, Week 1, during whole group instruction, students read the free verse poem “I Hear America Singing by Walt Whitman/ Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou.

  • In Unit 5, Week 2, students read a set of poetry labeled “Poems of the Industrial Age'' by well-known poets and authors from the early 20th centruy. This set of poems includes “Banking Coal’ by Jean Toomer, “Train Wreck” by James Steel Smith, and “Prayers of Steel'' by Carl Sandburg. 

  • In Unit 6, during small group instruction, students read the informational narrative nonfiction text Everest Dreaming by Sue Williams.

  • In Unit 7, Week 1, students read the memoir “The Banners of Freedom” by Boyrereau Brinch.

  • In Unit 8, Week 2, during small group instruction, students read the informational technical text Make a Family Emergency Plan by Kathy Furgang.

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, during small group instruction, students have three opportunities for reading historical fiction: Dear Annie: Letters from a Young Silversmith, Working in the 1800's, and Zora's Great Migration.

  • In Unit 10, Week 1, during whole group instruction, students read the biography John Dalton: Father of the Atomic Theory by Kathy Furgang.

Materials reflect an approximate 50/50 balance of informational and literary texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Overall the materials include 21 informational core texts and 23 literary core texts for a 48/52 balance.

  • Unit 1 contains 4 core texts with 25% being literary and 75% being informational.

  • Unit 2 contains 4 core texts with 100% being literary.

  • Unit 3 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 4  contains 5 core texts with 100% being literary.

  • Unit 5 contains 7 core texts with 71% being literary and 29% being informational.

  • Unit 6 contains 4 core texts with 100% being literary.

  • Unit 7 contains 4 core texts with 50% being literary and 50% being informational.

  • Unit 8 contains 4 core texts with 50% being literary and 50% being informational.

  • Unit 9 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

  • Unit 10 contains 4 core texts with 100% being informational.

Indicator 1C
04/04

Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Documentation should also include a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1c. 

Anchor texts range from 740L–1090L, with the majority of texts falling within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. Text excerpts that complement texts on the higher end of the stretch band  range in quantitative complexity from 740L–780L. Texts have an appropriate level of qualitative complexity, with most ranging from moderate to high complexity. The qualitative complexity of texts spans dimensions such as complex sets of events and characters that require an understanding of the time period, complicated plots, time shifts, and unfamiliar vocabulary including academic and domain-specific words. The Program Support Guide provides a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement.

Anchor/core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to their associated student task. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Day 1, students read “The Drive Down” (1080L), an excerpt from Brave As You by Jason Renolds. The quantitative complexity is above the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. Qualitatively, the text is considered highly difficult due to its unfamiliar vocabulary and complex sentence structure. Students summarize the text, and compare and contrast characters in the story. 

  • In Unit 4, Week 3, Day 1, students read “Miguel’s Prophecy” (740L), an excerpt from Esperanza Rising by Pam Munoz Ryan. The quantitative complexity falls below the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band; however, the text is qualitatively very complex as readers must draw inferences and navigate complex text structure. Students identify point of view and describe how point of view influences how events are described. 

  • In Unit 6, Week 3, Days 1–3, students read “The Knotted Branch” (940L), an extended read excerpt from “The Winter People'' by Joseph Bruchac. The quantitative complexity falls within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch band. This extended read has a high qualitative complexity, due to some rich vocabulary and descriptive language, unfamiliar terms that are not directly or indirectly supported with context clues, and the use of sentence structures that are both simple and complex. Students analyze characters in this text, as well as its accompanying paired selection, by comparing and contrasting the actions of the characters. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 2, Days1–4, students read “The Voyage” (820L) by Mary Pope Osborne. This excerpt from the ancient Greek myth falls within the Grades 4–5 Lexile Stretch Band. The mythical, somewhat other- worldly/fantasy quality will be unfamiliar to readers at first. Dialogue, sequence of events, descriptive text with some unfamiliar vocabulary, and sentences ranging from simple to complex also lend themselves to the text’s high qualitative complexity. After completing a close read of “The Odyssey Begins,” the previous text by the same author, students analyze the texts to compare and contrast the main character and identify the author’s purpose. 

Anchor/Core texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by an accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a separate text complexity document for both anchor texts and small group texts. The text complexity documents are accessible as PDFs for each grade in the digital Program Support Guide under the tab for Text Complexity Analyses and Rationales for Purpose and Placement. 

  • The Teacher Resource System for each unit also includes introductory materials including a Guide to Text Complexity section that provides an accurate summary of the quantitative and qualitative data for each anchor text in the unit. This guide contains an overall qualitative text complexity measure based on a color-coded system with levels of low complexity, moderate complexity, substantial complexity, and highest complexity. The guide shares a brief statement on the four qualitative measures of each text: Purpose and Levels of Meaning, Structure, Language Conventionality and Clarity, and Knowledge Demands.

  • The accuracy of the provided quantitative measures was verified using MetaMetrics or determined using the Lexile Text Analyzer on The Lexile Framework for Reading site. The accuracy of the provided qualitative measures was verified using literary and informational text rubrics.

Indicator 1D
02/04

Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band to support students’ literacy growth over the course of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 1d. 

The Lexile levels of the anchor texts range from 740–1090. Text complexity varies across the year but does not necessarily build over the course of the year. The texts with the highest quantitative measures are all informational texts containing domain-specific vocabulary with the purpose of knowledge building. While modeling of skills is present in most lessons, the time for modeling and practice is very brief and the skills change from day to day without providing sufficient practice and reinforcement. While the extended read texts in Weeks 2 and 3 of each unit allow for multiple reads, throughout each unit the routines, time frames, and expectations for reading and analyzing texts are similar and do not necessarily change based on the complexity of the text, making it difficult to determine how the materials will build independence in the reader throughout the year.

The complexity of anchor texts students read provides some opportunity for students’ literacy skills to increase across the year, encompassing an entire year’s worth of growth. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, the anchor texts range from 860L–1090L. Throughout the unit, students practice comprehension strategies, including explaining cause and effect relationships in the text. For example, students read the informational science text “The Structure of a Corn Plant” by Matthew Felkonian (1000L). The text is rated as moderately complex with some complex language but overall moderate knowledge demand. In Week 1, Day 3, the teacher rereads two paragraphs of the text and models how to analyze the structure of the text for cause and effect. Students then complete a Cause-and-Effect Text Structure Chart. At the end of the lesson, students use the information in the charts to discuss how the development of corn has had lasting impacts on the world. 

  • In Unit 5, the anchor texts are mostly poetry with two prose texts at a 970L and 980L. Throughout the unit, students practice comprehension strategies, such as determining how stanzas in a poem fit together and the relationship between events in a text. For example, during Week 3, students read two informational social studies texts, “Eli Whitney’s Cotton Gin” (970L) by Judi Black and “The Making of an Industrial Age” (980L) by Kathy Furgang. In Lesson 4, students close read “The Making of the Industrial Age” and analyze the chronological order of the text. With teacher guidance, students work with partners to answer the following prompt: “How did the inventions of the spinning jenny, spinning mule, and cotton gin influence other developments of the Industrial Revolution? Cite specific text evidence to support your thinking.”  The next day, students learn about problem/solution text structure and relationships in a text. Students utilize learning of relationships in text and text structure when independently responding to the writing prompt: “What problems did innovations in the textile industry solve? What new problems did these innovations create? How does the problem/solution structure contribute to the overall meaning of the text? Cite evidence from multiple texts to support your answer.”

  • In Unit 9, the anchor texts range from 800L–1030L. During the unit, students use what they have learned about text structure and relationships within the text to analyze how chronology shows relationships between concepts in a text. In Week 1, students read the biographical text “John Dalton: Father of the Atomic Theory” (880L) by Kathy Furgang. This text is rated as substantially complex with complexity in language and knowledge demands. The teacher explains that students will be looking for relationships between events and concepts in the text. Students work with partners to annotate the text and hold a Constructive Conversation to answer the question, “How does Democritus' theory of atoms relate to Dalton's atomic theory? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” After reflecting on the lesson, students independently respond to the prompt, “How does Dalton's atomic theory relate to modern science? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.”

As texts become more complex, some appropriate scaffolds and/or materials are provided in the Teacher Edition (e.g., spending more time on texts, more questions, repeated readings, skill lessons). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, the teacher reads the first two paragraphs of “The Structure of a Corn Plant” by Matthew Felkonian to model the comprehension strategy, asking questions: “Today as we read this text, I’m going to show you how I ask questions to help me focus my thinking and read for meaning.” Students then continue reading and practicing the strategy with a partner. 

  • In Unit 5, Week 2, students read two poems, ”Prayers of Steel '' by Carl Sandburg and “Banking Coal '' by Jean Toomer and compare the themes of both texts. Students work in pairs to read and annotate the texts. Teacher guidance includes, “...Observe [students’] conversation to determine the level of support they might need.” 

  • In Unit 9, Week 2, students engage in an independent read of the text “Old Cities Revitalized” by Alexandra Hanson Harding. Teacher guidance for the first read includes, “Ask students to read paragraphs 1–3 and to annotate the text to support their comprehension. For example, they might underline relevant details, circle unfamiliar vocabulary and look for context clues, and jot ideas and questions in the margins. If it is useful, choose an alternate approach from Ways to Scaffold the First Reading.” The scaffolding suggestions, which are located in the margin of the lesson, are not text-specific and are the same for every unit.

Indicator 1E
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year, including accountability structures for independent reading.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1e.

Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading. The anchor texts provide some range of text types, with the majority of texts being informational science or social studies texts. More varied text types are included in the small group instruction Building Knowledge Text Sets. Each unit also includes a novel study that is recommended but not required for independent reading. 

Materials provide support for the teacher to foster independent reading; however, the prompts frequently focus on comprehension strategies. Materials provide independent reading procedures but many are not built into the program framework. The program includes “independent reading mini lessons;” however, there is no schedule or guidance available for teachers to know when to teach these mini lessons. Accountability systems for independent reading include a reading log and corresponding family letter. Materials provide a recommended amount of time students should spend reading, along with a schedule to provide students adequate opportunities to engage in independent reading; however, there is no information on the volume of reading students should do during this time. The Pacing Guide in the Teachers Resource Guide for each unit delineates implementation formats for 90-minute, 120-minute, and 150-minute blocks. For the implementation of the program within a 90-minute reading block, the Read Aloud is removed and the time for small group and independent reading time is combined to 15 minutes or less which would significantly reduce the volume of reading for students, as time allotted for the Building Knowledge Text Sets is reduced.

Instructional materials clearly identify opportunities and support for students to engage in reading a variety of text types and genres. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Across Units 1-10, the anchor texts include personal essays, realistic fiction, informational life science and social studies texts, biographies, fantasy, dramas and plays, opinion texts, journals, speeches, personal narratives, myths, legends, science fiction, fables, and free verse, lyric, and narrative poetry. 

  • The Building Knowledge Text Sets (in which not every student will access all texts) include fantasy, realistic fiction, journals, social studies texts, biographies, plays, fables, procedural texts, opinion, drama, historical fiction, life science, technical texts, legends, narrative nonfiction, graphic stories, folktales and personal narrative texts. 

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Days 1-3 students read the realistic fiction “The Drive Down” an excerpt from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. In Unit 2, Week 1, Days 4-5 students read “Grandpop’s Surprise” an excerpt from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. In Unit 2, Week 2, Days 1-5 students read “Sky-Glitter” an excerpt from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. In Unit 2, Week 3 Days 1-2 students read “Ernie’s Secret” an excerpt from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. In Unit 2, Week 3, Day 5 students read the narrative poem Casey At Bat by Ernest Lawrence Thayer.

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, Days 1-3, students read the myth The Odyssey Begins by Mary Pope Osborne. In Unit 8, Week 1, Day 4, students read the informational science interview Water-Wise Landscaper by Climate Kids/Michelle Pekko-Seymoure. In Unit 8, Week 2, Days 1-4 students read the myth The Voyage by Mary Pope Osborne. In Unit 8, Week 3, Days 1-3 students read the informational science text Questions and Answers About the Oceans by Climate Kids. In Unit 8, Week 3, Day 5 students read the narrative poem Burn Lake by Carrie Fountain.

Instructional materials identify opportunities and support for students to engage in a volume of reading. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students read 50 anchor texts over the course of the year. 20 of these texts are short reads, 20 are extended reads, and 10 are poems. Additionally they read 30 vocabulary practice texts and 10 reader theater texts. Students listen to a read aloud for 10-15 minutes daily.

  • Within a school day students listen to a read-aloud for 10-15 minutes, engage with an anchor text, and participate in small group and/or independent reading. 30-40 minutes of independent reading time is suggested per day.

  • The Weekly Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes a section titled Independent Reading & Conferring. While materials offer independent reading selections, the teacher is also prompted within the lesson for students to use this time to complete the whole group reading and task. Each day has a focus task for independent reading including “Set Personal Learning Goals,” “Read Independently,” Begin the Blueprint,” “Read the Vocabulary Practice Text,” or “Create a Decision Making Guide.” The planner provides these teacher recommendations for independent reading:

    •  Ensure that all students read independently to build volume and stamina.

    • Confer with a few students on their text selections, application of strategies, and knowledge building tasks.

    • See additional independent suggestions (including the Research and Inquiry Project) on the Unit Foldout. 

  • In Unit 4, during a three week time period, students read two short reads; poetry I Hear America Singing/Caged Bird by Walt Whitman and Maya Angelou and historical fiction text Gold Country by Laurence Yep. Students read two extended texts; a historical fiction text I Speak Spanish Too by Maria Mahia and realistic fiction text Miguel’s Prophecy by Pam Muñoz Ryan. In addition they read the narrative poem I, Too by Langston Hughs. Students participate in daily independent and/or small group reading.

There is sufficient teacher guidance to foster independence for all readers (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The teacher edition includes daily Reading and Responding lessons to be used with the anchor texts.

  • Materials provide a list of trade books for read alouds that could also be used as recommendations for students during independent reading time.

  • Materials include a weekly reading log for both at home and at school, as well as a family letter that coincides with the home reading log.

  • Materials offer additional resources to support the teacher with fostering students’ independent reading; however, some of these resources are not a part of the core program or are not incorporated into the daily framework. These materials include:

    • Independent reading mini lessons are provided but information as to when to do them is not included.

    • The Teacher Edition provides Review and Routines which includes independent reading routines. The routines provide information as to what to do during independent reading. They do not provide information for setting up procedures or expectations. Materials also do not provide information on the volume of reading students should be doing during this time.

    • The Additional Resources section includes a Managing Your Independent Reading Guide. This  resource includes teacher guidance on conferring periodically or as often as possible with students. The “Conferring with Students'' section explains what a reading conference is, why teachers should have them and a general idea of how to run one. This section does not give teachers guidance on how to grow independent readers during a conference.

    • Each unit provides a student ebook for recommended independent reading; however, materials do not provide text-specific guidance, student tasks, or accountability measures for the ebook.

Criterion 1.2: Tasks and Questions

16/16

Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.

The majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text. Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners. The discussion protocols fall primarily under the following two protocols: Turn and Talk and Constructive Conversations. These discussion opportunities are frequent in the materials and vary in purpose. In some units, students engage in whole group presentations. Materials provide opportunities for on-demand writing and longer process writing tasks throughout the school year. Students engage in a variety of genres of writing tasks including, but not limited to, informative/explanatory, opinion, narrative, and poetry. Materials provide a balance of required writing throughout the year. Students engage in writing to respond to text, build knowledge, write essays, and create products. The majority of units feature text-based prompts or process writing prompts that explicitly require students to gather and use evidence from either anchor texts or outside sources such as websites. Evidence-based writing instruction occurs during writing lessons and includes intentional modeling, practice, and analysis. Materials include explicit instruction for all grammar and usage standards for the grade level. Instruction on grammar and usage occurs in context within anchor reading texts and in grammar lessons provided in the writing block. The Program Support Guide provides a one-page Year-Long Vocabulary Development Plan which provides the focus word list for each week. Vocabulary relates to the Unit’s theme or topic and appears in the texts and activities students engage in during the lessons.

Indicator 1F
02/02

Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and/or text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1f. 

The majority of questions and tasks are text-specific, text-dependent, and require evidence from the text. Activities such as Build, Reflect, Write; Extended Thinking Questions; Apply Understanding; Share and Reflect; Constructive Conversations, and Guided Practice accompany the anchor texts for Short Reads and Extended Reads. When completing many of these tasks, students must use textual evidence to support answers to questions and discussions, both independently and collaboratively. Each unit also includes text-specific questions during which students synthesize or compare and contrast information across texts. 

The Teacher’s Resource System for each unit provides implementation and follow up support for text-dependent questioning and discussion. The Teacher’s Resource System also includes text-dependent questions and tasks for the teacher to use during mini-lessons and small group instruction. The student ebook for each unit’s anchor texts also includes text-dependent questions in the Apply Understanding and Build Knowledge sections after each text. Writing prompts that build toward the unit culminating task are also typically text-dependent. Materials include possible responses for many questions or discussion prompts posed during the mini-lessons. The Small Group texts also include text-dependent questions; however, due to the choice in literacy block length and needs of students, some students may not have the opportunity to respond to all of the text-dependent questions during small group time.

Text-specific and text-dependent questions and tasks support students in making meaning of the core understandings of the texts being studied. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 4, students read the extended read text “A Short History of a Special Plant’ by Laura McDonald. During the reading, students “reread paragraphs 7–9. Identify and underline key details. Use these to determine the central idea.” During the Apply Understanding part of the lesson, “students reread paragraphs 10–15, identify key details, interpret graphic features, and identify a central idea.” Students then “write a short paragraph explaining how key details and graphic features helped them determine one or more central ideas.” Once students complete this, they respond to the following question in their e-notebook: “Reread paragraphs 14–15 and refer to the graph ‘U.S. Corn Production.’ Based on this information, what factors may have contributed to the decline in corn production in 2012? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.” 

  • In Unit 6, Week 3, Lesson 9, in Constructive Conversations, students work with a partner to read and annotate “Brushfire” by David Boelke and “The Knotted Branch” by Joseph Bruchac and respond to the following prompt: “Compare and contrast the ways Saxso from ‘The Knotted Branch’ and Ed from ‘Brushfire!’ respond to the challenges they face. What do their responses tell you about the relationship between family and survival? Cite specific evidence from each text to support your thinking.” Materials include possible responses and evidence for teacher use. 

  • In Unit 9, Week 2, Lesson 12, in Apply Understanding, students independently use their notebooks or e-notebooks to respond to the following question: “ Which city was most affected by the Great Migration: Chicago, New York City, or Detroit? Cite specific text evidence to support your thinking.” Materials include sample answers and evidence as a model.

Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-based questions and tasks. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 9, materials include a script for teacher use to engage students’ thinking and set the purpose for the lesson: “Earlier in the unit, you read ‘Grandpop’s Surprise,’ which recounted how Genie found out his grandfather was blind. Today, you will use information from that text, as well as from ‘Ernie’s Secret,’ to compare and contrast two excerpts that have the same theme.” During Constructive Conversations, students work with a partner to compare and contrast the ways the texts introduce and develop the theme of being brave. Materials include possible responses for teacher use, such as “‘Grandpop’s Surprise’ introduces the theme of bravery when Genie learns why Grandpop does not want people to know he’s blind.”

  • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 12, the teacher reads aloud “Eli Whitney’s Cotton Gin” by Judi Black and models going back into the text to find a problem/solution relationship. The Teacher Resource system includes the following script for teacher use: “I read that it was ‘tedious and labor-intensive work: to separate cotton fibers from the seed.’ In the next sentence of the text, the author says that this stage took the most time to complete. These sentences introduce a problem. I'm going to underline them and rewrite the problem in my own words in the margins: Separating cotton fibers was a difficult, time-consuming process. Now I'll continue to read and look for the solution.”

  • In Unit 9, Week 3, Lesson 9, the teacher displays the close reading question, “What economic change did most cities in the United States experience between 1930-1960? What were the effects of this change? Cite specific text evidence from ‘Chicago: An American Hub’ and ‘Old Cities Revitalize’ to support your answer.” Students reread and annotate the texts with a partner. Then they discuss the close reading question. Materials include the following teacher guidance to support students with the task: “The question directs me back to a specific text. I scan ‘Chicago: An American Hub’ to locate relevant information about the economy in the 1930s to 1960s. I find information in paragraph 8 about the effect of the Great Depression in the 1930s on Chicago’s economy. The author compares it to other cities. There is also information about the 1950s and 1960s that will help me answer the question.”

Indicator 1G
02/02

Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1g. 

Materials include regular opportunities for students to engage in discussions with the class or partners. The discussion protocols fall primarily under the following two protocols: Turn and Talk and Constructive Conversations. These discussion opportunities are frequent in the materials and vary in purpose. Guidance for teachers and students includes a question for the teacher to pose, possible student responses, and generic protocol directions through the use of the “Guidance for Effective Classroom, Small Group, and Partner Discussion in the Review and Routines Guide.” Most notably, the materials provide a breakdown of each protocol in the “Speaking and Listening Protocols” document found in the Additional Materials section. 

Materials provide varied protocols to support students’ developing speaking and listening skills across the whole year’s scope of instructional materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Multiple opportunities to Turn and Talk throughout each unit and the year. These Turn and Talks vary on their structure and their purpose. 

  • Each unit contains Discuss the Blueprint lessons. These lessons include a Constructive Conversations component. The directions remain the same throughout the units and the school year. 

  • Under Additional Resources for each unit, materials provide a Real-World Perspectives Supporting Constructive Conversations reproducible for use with the corresponding lesson of the unit. This reproducible tells students the different parts of a Constructive Conversation and includes sentence stems for student use during each part. According to the reproducible, the five parts of a Constructive Conversation include state ideas; clarify ideas; support and build up ideas; introduce, clarify, and support a second idea; and evaluate and compare ideas. The reproducible includes 5 Respectful Conversation Tips and a Build Knowledge Word Bank. The reproducible starts with the first 3 parts of the conversation and adds the fourth and fifth step as the year progresses. The Build Knowledge Word Bank changes from unit to unit.

  • In the Day 2 mini lesson of the Launch materials, students learn about being an active listener. “Conduct a brief discussion about what people do to be active listeners. List suggestions given by students on the anchor chart. Some important things to include could be as follows: - Have eyes on the speaker, - Maintain a quiet body, - Use appropriate expression to show interest, - Be patient while the speaker chooses what to say. Give enough wait time - Think carefully about what the speaker is saying.” 

  • In the Research and Inquiry guide for teachers, the margin on page 10 provides Options for Presenting for student use. The options are the same for each research project and the following is provided:

    • “There are many ways that students can share with one another. Choose one that works well in your classroom setting.

    • Whole group: Students can present to the entire class.

    • Small group: Break students into groups of 3–4 to present to one another.

    • Partnerships: Pair students up to share their projects.

    • Video: Students can film their presentation and share them on a digital platform.

    • Visits: Students can visit other classrooms to share what they have created and learned, or guests can join you in the classroom in person or virtually.

    • Out in the World: If the inquiry project is one that would be useful for others, students can mail or email the project.”

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 1, students engage in a Turn and Talk to “Discuss each caption’s connection to the image it supports.” Teachers remind students to “...take turns and listen carefully when their partner iis speaking.” 

  • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 3, at the end of the lesson, students engage in a discussion to share and reflect on their learning about the brainstorming process. Teacher guidance includes, “Have partners discuss the brainstorming process and how they chose what they want to write about. Select one or two students to share their ideas with the class. At the end of the lesson, students should review their writing checklists and, if necessary, update them.” 

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Lesson 9, students engage in a Constructive Conversation with a partner to dig deeper on the topic of chemical change: “How is Dalton's Atomic Theory relevant to Marie Daly's work linking the chemical reactions during digestion to human health in relationship to cholesterol? Cite specific evidence from ‘Marie M. Daly: Biochemistry Pioneer’ and ‘John Dalton: Father of the Atomic Theory’ to support your answer.” The teacher observes the conversation and provides support as needed. 

Speaking and listening instruction includes facilitation, monitoring, and instructional support for teachers. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Teacher Resource material, under the Additional Materials section for each unit, materials include a document that provides general teacher guidance on “Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations.” This guidance is the same throughout all units across the year.

    • For example, the resource states, “Teachers and students can better understand how to improve conversations with the tools that accompany the Benchmark Advance program. The first tool, the ‘Conversation Blueprint,’ is a visual guide to help teachers scaffold students’ conversations. This tool shows the structure of the two main types of conversations that should happen during lessons. The tools especially designed for students are the Think-Speak-Listen Flip Book…” These tools offer sentence systems for various skills within a conversation.”

  • The Discuss the Blueprint Constructive Conversations lessons include an Observational Checklist for Constructive Conversations for teacher use. Guidance in the Observational Checklist includes, “As peers engage in conversation, use the questions below to evaluate how effectively they communicate with each other. Based on your answers, you may wish to plan future lessons to support the constructive conversation process.” Questions include, “stay on topic throughout the discussion?, listen respectfully?, build on the comments of others?”

  • In Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 7, students conduct a Constructive Conversation with a partner. Materials include a list of Look-Fors for the teacher to use when monitoring students’ conversations. “Do peers:

    • stay on topic throughout the discussion?

    • listen respectfully?

    • build on the comments of others appropriately?

    • pose or respond to questions to clarify information?

    • support their peers to participate?”

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, Lesson 4, students read “Androcles and the Lion,” a fable by Aesop. During the Constructive Conversation: Partner section of the Build Vocabulary mini-lesson, students determine the meaning of selected words from the story. Materials include a graphic organizer of context clues that the teacher should hear students say when discussing each word. 

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, Lesson 7, students complete the short read “The Birth of Chicago” by Odia Wood-Krueger. After completing a partner practice task on gathering evidence from multiple sources, students then participate in a Turn and Talk. Materials provide teacher support for implementing the task and monitoring responses: “Pose questions that require students to use their knowledge of text features to focus on Enduring Understanding 1 from the Knowledge Blueprint (The first people to live in the area that becomes a city are part of that city’s history). Ask partners to share ideas using words from the Build Knowledge Word Bank. Invite a few students to share their ideas.” Materials include sample answers for teacher use.

Indicator 1H
02/02

Materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1h. 

Throughout the year, students typically have the opportunity to engage in speaking and listening daily, including opportunities to speak in whole group, partner, and small group settings. In some units, students engage in whole group presentations. These opportunities include speaker and audience expectations in the form of teacher directions and anchor charts. The materials provide partner sharing and small group discussion opportunities during the majority of speaking and listening tasks. Students complete a Knowledge Blueprint graphic organizer during the unit and hold a class discussion on what they learned at the end of the unit; the Knowledge Blueprint is expanded upon throughout the unit. Materials include opportunities to implement agreed upon rules for discussions, partner and small group work, and to guide students on answering questions about a speaker. While the materials do provide opportunities for students to address all of the Speaking and Listening standards, some of the activities are optional or at the discretion of the teacher. 

Students have many opportunities over the school year to demonstrate what they are reading through varied speaking and listening opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation and other information known about the topic to explore ideas under discussion. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Week 3, students work with a partner to integrate information from multiple sources. Students “[r]eread paragraphs 4–7 and review the line graph, U.S. Corn Yields (1866–present). How does the information presented by the line graph support the author’s opinion? Jot your notes in the margin as you integrate information from the text and line graph.” 

  • Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions and carry out assigned roles. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Review and Routines Grade 5, Day 2, the teacher and students co-create an anchor chart about what it means to be an active listener. These agreed-upon rules are revisited and used throughout the year. The teacher then models how partners should take on roles during their discussion and says, “Now, in your partner group, each partner will take turns asking and answering a question. In round one, Partner 1 will start by asking the question while Partner 2 answers. Then Partner 2 will ask Partner 1 the same question and listen to Partner 1 answer. In round two, Partner 2 asks the question first while Partner 1 answers. Partner 1 asks Partner 2 the same question and listens to Partner 1 answer. Let’s begin. Partner 1, here’s your first question.”

  • Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics, sound) and visual displays in presentations when appropriate to enhance the development of main ideas or themes. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 9, students present a multimedia presentation to the class that addresses the following prompt: “In this unit, we will be creating a multimedia presentation about a way to improve your community.” Students work on the presentations in Weeks 1-3 to ensure that the presentation:

      • Identifies a clear topic and purpose, and is shaped for a specific audience.

      • Organizes information in a logical way.

      • Includes effective visuals and/or other multimedia components

While the materials indicate that students can incorporate other multimedia components outside of visuals, the materials only provide guidance to teachers about how to model including various types of visuals.

Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Pose and respond to specific questions by making comments that contribute to the discussion and elaborate on the remarks of others. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 5, Unit 2, Step 5, students present their author comparison studies. The materials direct the teacher to say, “Audience: Be prepared to contribute to a discussion by responding to specific questions from the presenter, and by posing some specific questions of your own. You should pose questions and make comments that elaborate on what the presenter said, as well as on the remarks of others. Think about the key ideas expressed in the presentation. What conclusions can you draw from the information and knowledge you learned?”

  • Review the key ideas expressed. Materials do not have opportunities for students to draw conclusions in light of information and knowledge gained from the discussions. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In the Research and Inquiry Project Teacher’s Guide Grade 5, Units 7-8, Step 5, students present their research project. The materials direct the teacher to say, “Audience: Be prepared to contribute to a discussion by responding to specific questions from the presenter, and by posing some specific questions of your own. You should pose questions and make comments that elaborate on what the presenter said, as well as on the remarks of others. Think about the key ideas expressed in the presentation. What conclusions can you draw from the information and knowledge you learned?”

  • Summarize a written text read aloud or information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 10, Week 3, Lesson 12, students read the poem “The Snowflake” (author not cited) and then listen to an audio recording. Students then analyze the meaning of the poem. 

  • Summarize the points a speaker makes and explain how each claim is supported by reasons and evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 6, Week 3, students compare two unit texts, “The Knotted Branch” an excerpt of The Winter People by Joseph Bruchac, and “Brushfire” a play excerpt by David Boelke. During the Constructive Conversation section, students work in pairs to synthesize information across both texts: “Compare and contrast the ways Saxso from ‘The Knotted Branch’ and Ed from ‘Brushfire!’ respond to the challenges they face. What do their responses tell you about the relationship between family and survival? Cite specific evidence from each text to support your thinking.” Afterwards, students participate in a Turn and Talk and discuss the following question: “What lessons can readers learn about problem-solving and decision-making from the ways Saxso’s responds to challenges in ‘The Knotted Branch?’” 

  • Report on a topic or text or present an opinion, sequencing ideas logically and using appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details to support main ideas or themes; speak clearly at an understandable pace. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • In Unit 1, Weeks 1–3, students work on a Research and Inquiry report: “For this Research and Inquiry Project, you will research a plant-based resource or a staple food crop such as rubber, timber, wheat, rice, soy, or potatoes. Then you will create a project to present the knowledge you have built. Your project will include facts and key information about the topic, as well as visuals such as maps, drawings, timelines, or photographs that help the audience build knowledge. You will create a podcast, a video, a print or digital timeline, or an idea of your own.” Students present their project upon completion and the teacher may utilize the Options for Presenting resource.

Indicator 1I
02/02

Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g., multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1i. 

Materials provide opportunities for on-demand writing and longer process writing tasks throughout the school year. Mini-lessons provide students with direct instruction, guided practice, and independent time for writing. Students engage in a variety of genres of writing tasks including, but not limited to, informative/explanatory, opinion, timelines, and summaries. At the end of each text or text set, students have opportunities to write in response to text and are required to cite text evidence in their response. With multi-day writing tasks, the teacher models various revision and editing strategies and students have time to revise and edit their writing. Materials provide guidance for digital opportunities with some writing tasks. Materials also include additional guided inquiry projects aligned with unit(s) topics that can be incorporated within the unit.

Materials include on-demand writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, after reading “The Structure of a Corn Plant” by Matthew Felkonian and “The Future of a Crop” by Amelia Millilo, students write a 1–2 paragraph response in a notebook or e-notebook to answer the following questions: How do the parts of a plant work together to perform a function? Cite evidence from Short Read q to support your answer.  Summarize the two sides of “The Ethanol Debate” presented in Short Read 2.  Use key details from the text to support your work.  In Short Reads 1 and 2, the authors use plant diagrams.  How are the diagrams similar?  How are they different?  What is the purpose of each diagram?  Cite details from both texts that support your answer.  

  • In Unit 4, Week 2, after reading “I Speak Spanish, Too” by Maria Mahiat, students rewrite an event from another perspective: “Reread paragraphs 8–15. How would this section be told differently from Judy’s perspective...write the change in perspective in the margins.”

  • In Unit 5, Week 3, students independently complete the Write to Demonstrate Knowledge section of the Culminating Task. Students write 1–2 paragraphs about the Enduring Understandings for the Unit which address the positive and negative impacts of technological innovation: “Reread the Enduring Understandings on the inside front cover. How have the texts you’ve read, your own experience creating a timeline, and the research you’ve done for your Research and Inquiry Project given you new insights into these statements?”

  • In Unit 6, Week 2, after reading “The Law of Club and Fang” from The Call of the Wild by Jack London, students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the following prompt: “How does Buck’s life now compare with the life he lived in California? Based on your analysis, has being in this new environment changed his character? Cite specific evidence from the text to support your claim.”

  • In Unit 10, Week 2, students write a summary of the key details and central idea of one section of “Changes in Matter” by Laura McDonald.  

Materials include process writing opportunities that cover a year’s worth of instruction. Opportunities for students to revise and edit are provided. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, students write an informative/explanatory essay about a topic based on voting rights in the United States. Students plan and draft their essays and the teacher models evaluating and revising correct use of commas. During Guided Practice, students work with a partner to revise practice text for correct comma usage. During Independent Writing, students revise their drafts for correct comma usage.

  • In Unit 5, Week 3, students create a timeline that includes important events and inventions during the Industrial Revolution. Students revisit the timeline and add additional information based on their responses to the following questions: “What new information from this week’s reading should be added to your timeline?” and “How do you determine what dates and events are important enough to include?” 

  • In Unit 9, Week 3, students develop a multimedia presentation. During a mini-lesson, the teacher models how to evaluate each part of the presentation, connect ideas using note cards, and ensure visuals are strong. Students analyze and revise their presentations afterwards. 

Materials include digital resources where appropriate. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • All units include Build-Reflect-Write eNotebooks for student use when responding to the close reading text Apply Understanding questions and Culminating Activity Enduring Understanding questions, as well as when completing Build Vocabulary tasks, Build Grammar and Language tasks, and graphic organizers for their Research and Inquiry project.

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, students type the final draft of their essays on voting rights in the United Stateson the computer. Materials also include a Keyboarding Practice Lesson that can be given to increase students’ keyboarding skills.

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, students create a multimedia presentation. The teacher models generating ideas for strong supporting visuals. During oral rehearsal, students work with a partner to review their Multimedia Presentation Storyboard and discuss ideas for visuals. During independent time, students continue to work on their presentations, planning their reason/evidence slides and planning on visuals to support their presentation.

Indicator 1J
02/02

Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1j. 

Across the year, students engage in a variety of writing text types through many different types of writing activities. Materials include an entire unit on text-based prompts and a unit on process writing for each of the writing types. The Program Support Guide includes a K-6 Year-Long Writing Scope and Sequence indicating which writing types and standards are the focus of each unit. There is a balance between writing in response to texts as well as process writing on a topic aligned to the unit focus. The writing mini-lessons occur daily and each unit utilizes multiple anchor charts, checklists, and graphic organizers called planning guides to support and guide students through each writing process. The majority of units include mentor texts for students to analyze before writing their own pieces.

Materials provide multiple opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply different genres/modes/types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for opinion writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 28% of the writing in Grade 5 is opinion writing. Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing as the focus of Unit 2 and Unit 5. In Unit 6, students also use opinion writing for a text-based prompt in each of the weeks.

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for informative/explanatory writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 36% of writing in Grade 5 is informative/explanatory writing. Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing as the focus of Units 1, 3, 8, and 9. Both the Research Project in Unit 8 and the Multimedia Project in Unit 9 are informational. In Unit 6, students also use informative writing for a text-based prompt in each of the weeks.

  • The following percentages or number of writing opportunities for narrative writing encompass the writing types and prompts from the writing mini-lessons across the year but do not include the daily text-based questions:

    • Approximately 36% of writing in Grade 5 is narrative writing. Students have opportunities to focus on Unit 4 and Unit 7. In Unit 6, students also use narrative writing for a text-based prompt in each of the weeks. This percentage also includes the poetry writing students do in Unit 10.

  • Explicit instruction in opinion writing:

    • In Unit 2, Week 2, students engage in writing a multimedia opinion essay addressing the following prompt: “After reading “The Drive Down,” and “Grandpop’s Surprise,” write a multi-paragraph essay in which you answer the question: Would you recommend author Jason Reynolds to other readers? Support your opinion with details from the excerpts.”  The teacher models developing reasons based on facts and details, using text evidence to form an opinion, and planning and organizing the opinion essay.  

  • Explicit instruction in informative/explanatory writing:

    • In Unit 1 students write an informative/explanatory text. In Week 1 students analyze the features of an informative/explanatory essay and take notes from the source text and video. In Week 2, the teacher reviews the key elements of an informative/explanatory essay, reads the prompt, and models how to analyze it. During Independent time students generate questions about corn production that will help them focus on maid ideas and key details as they read and view sources. Students continue to plan, draft, revise, and edit through Week 3, the teacher models how to evaluate an essay. 

  • Explicit instruction in narrative writing: 

    • In Unit 7, students study informational texts about ancient cultures and  engage in narrative writing by crafting a self-selected piece of historical fiction. In Week 1, students read a mentor text and the teacher uses the sample story of two brothers in Egypt as they model how to use the Historical Fiction Anchor Chart and Writing Checklist. The lesson models support students as they brainstorm a historical --- and determine the needed evidence or information to create characters and the event. In Week 2, students begin a draft of their piece with an attention to developing their characters and events. In Week 3, students continue enhancing their pieces and working with partners to use more descriptive details and pace the events in the story. Once edited, students use technology to publish their writing. 

Different genres/modes/types of writing are distributed throughout the school year. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in opinion writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • Introduce a topic or text clearly, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure in which ideas are logically grouped to support the writer's purpose. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Week 1, the teacher models how to state an opinion and use facts, reasons, and details from a text to support a point of view in an opinion writing piece. During independent work time, students begin to plan and draft their own opinion essay by stating their opinion.  

    • Provide logically ordered reasons that are supported by facts and details. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Week 1, the teacher models organizing and planning an opinion essay, using facts and details. During independent work time, students begin to organize their facts and add details to support their opinion.  

    • Link opinion and reasons using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., consequently, specifically). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 5, Week 2, the teacher models using words and phrases to link and opinion and reasons.  The teacher draws attention to words and phrases that show the relationship between the opinion statement and the reason and explains that “linking words and phrases connect and hold ideas together.  These words and phrases show the relationships between the key ideas and give your entire essay a cohesive feel.”  Students work in pairs to examine their drafts and identify transition words and phrases they have already used.  They then talk about words and phrases they could add to better link their ideas and provide meaningful transitions between details and concepts.  During independent work time, students focus on using linking words and phrases in their individual drafts.  

    • Provide a concluding statement or section related to the opinion presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 2, Week 1, the teacher models creating a concluding statement.  Students work with a partner to write a concluding statement for a given opinion statement. During independent time students write a different concluding statement for the mentor opinion essay.

  • Students have opportunities to engage in informative/explanatory writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Introduce a topic clearly, provide a general observation and focus, and group related information logically; include formatting (e.g., headings), illustrations, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 1, Week 1, the teacher models how to organize related ideas in paragraphs. The teacher begins by introducing the topic in the first paragraph so readers know that corn is important to people and animals.  The teacher models using notes to develop the next paragraph by adding related ideas and descriptive words to help the reader understand what the plant looks like.  Students work in pairs to reread paragraph 4 of the Mentor text to analyze the main idea of the paragraph and the facts and details that support it. During independent work time, students analyze the Mentor text conclusion.  

    • Develop the topic with facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples related to the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 8, Week 2, the teacher models using relevant facts and details related to the topic to provide support for the main idea. Students work in pairs to write a sentence with no specific details.  Then, they rewrite the sentence using facts, details, and quotations to develop their ideas. During independent work time, students should add facts, details, and examples to their drafts.  The teacher should encourage students to add a quotation if appropriate.  

    • Link ideas within and across categories of information using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., in contrast, especially). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 8, Week 2, the teacher models how to make connections in writing by linking ideas with linking words, phrases, and clauses.  During independent work time, students revise their individual writing to add linking words, phrases, and clauses.  

    • Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Week 3, the teacher models revising an informative essay to add domain specific vocabulary and precise language for clarity.  During independent work time, students revise their individual informative writing pieces to add precise language and domain specific vocabulary.  

    • Provide a concluding statement or section related to the information or explanation presented. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 3, Week 2, students engage in a mini-lesson on providing a concluding statement to their essay. Teachers use a model to show how an effective conclusion summarizes the informative/explanatory essay. Students write a conclusion for their essay during independent time. 

  • Students have opportunities to engage in narrative writing. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

    • Orient the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Week 2, the teacher models how to determine character traits and use this information to develop the narrator as a character in fictional narratives.  Students work with a partner to identify another character trait of the narrator, considering the narrator’s thoughts, actions, and words as they draw inferences. During independent work time, students write a short scene with the narrator, using one of the character traits.  When writing, students should use the narrator’s thoughts, actions, and words to show the character trait.  

    • Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, description, and pacing, to develop experiences and events or show the responses of characters to situations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 4, Week 3, students engage in a mini-lesson on how to improve the dialogue in a narrative writing task. Teachers model improving dialogue by matching the formality of the dialogue and by specific word choice such as adding an idiom or a comparative adverb. Then students work with a partner to revise a section of dialogue. Finally, students return to their drafts to revise their dialogue.

    • Use a variety of transitional words, phrases, and clauses to manage the sequence of events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 7, Week 3, the teacher models using transitional words and phrases to a historical writing piece.  Students work in pairs to look for places in their historical fiction pieces to add words that signal event order.  During independent work time, students should add transitional words and phrases to their historical writing piece to make the sequence of events clearer.  

    • Use concrete words and phrases and sensory details to convey experiences and events precisely. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 7, Week 3, the teacher models using descriptive words to convey experiences and events precisely.  Students read aloud a practice text and work together to add descriptive details.  During independent work time, students revise their historical writing pieces to add precise words and phrases to “convey events and experiences more specifically.”  

    • Provide a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • In Unit 7, Week 2, the teacher models writing a conclusion for a narrative piece of writing that “wraps up the action and the scene and provides the reader with something to think about.”  Students work in pairs to brainstorm a conclusion for their historical narrative writing piece.  During independent work time, students draft a conclusion to their historical fiction writing piece.  

Where appropriate, writing opportunities are connected to texts and/or text sets (either as prompts, models, anchors, or supports). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 2, students reread a section of the text “Fighting for the Vote” identifying details that support a central idea, and then use those notes to write a summary. 

  • In Unit 6, Week 1, students write a personal connection in the margins of paragraph 3 of “Androcles and the Lion.”

  • In Unit 10, Week 1, students write a response to the following questions, “How does Dalton's atomic theory relate to modern science? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” Teachers instruct students to use both the text and graphic features to answer the question.

Indicator 1K
02/02

Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1k. 

The majority of units feature text-based prompts or process writing prompts that explicitly require students to gather and use evidence from either anchor texts or outside sources such as websites. Evidence-based writing instruction occurs during writing lessons and includes intentional modeling, practice, and analysis. Teacher modeling typically uses graphic organizers or anchor charts, think-alouds, and underlining in the text where to find evidence. Each unit includes three writing prompts and 1–2 longer writing texts in which students must use text evidence in their responses. 

Materials provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 2, Mini-lesson 6, the teacher explicitly models using evidence to develop topics and details in essays: “Once a writer introduces the topic of an informative essay, the next step is developing the topic. Today we will use the information we’ve gathered to develop our topics and add details to our essays.” Students work to review their Planning Guides and annotate details and examples to include in their essays. Students continue into independent writing time and draft specific details that will help them develop cohesive, relevant, and engaging paragraphs.

  • In Unit 6, Week 2, Mini-lesson 9, the teacher explicitly models gathering facts and details from credible sources: “To gather information, I’m going to look for relevant facts and details in “The Structure of the Corn Plant” that relate to my essay topic.” The teacher models how to use the Note-Taking Guide to capture evidence. Students use evidence and apply it to writing by responding to the prompt: “Based on your notes from the source text, write a description of a corn plant in your own words.”

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, Mini-lesson 9, the teacher explicitly models selecting knowledgeable and credible print sources: “I've chosen credible print sources to gather information for my topic on threats to the world’s water supply. By reviewing the Table of Contents and index, I found several facts in the book The Human Effect on Earth's Resources. I also found facts in an article in a science journal.” The teacher models how to use the Note-Taking Chart to gather evidence. Students collect evidence to use in the draft writing of a research project.

Writing opportunities are focused around students’ recall of information to develop opinions from reading closely and working with evidence from texts and sources.

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, Mini-lesson 10, the teacher models how to summarize and synthesize to learn about voting rights. “When I synthesize, I read my summary and decide if my thinking has changed. Then I draw a conclusion to give new meaning to the text. My new opinion is if a group of voters is discriminated against, then the problem should be solved.” The teacher poses a guided practice task and students complete the task by finding key details in a paragraph and using them as evidence to summarize and synthesize their opinion.

  • In Unit 5, Week 1, Mini-lesson 3 the teacher models how to write and opinion essay on a scienc and technology topic: “I want to select a clear opinion statement that I think can be supported with evidence, but I also know that I may need to revise my opinion if the evidence I find in my research does not support it.” Students begin drafting their informative/explanatory essays using the  Informative/Explanatory Essay Anchor Chart, the Informative/Explanatory Essay Writing Checklist, the Planning Guide, and the Texts for Close Reading.

  • In Unit 7, Week 2, students write 1–2 paragraphs in their notebook or e-notebook in response to the following text-based prompt: “In ‘Natve Americans in the Revolution,’ the author claims that the conclusion of the American Revolution was not the end of the violence between Native nations and American settlers. Does the author’s evidence adequately support this claim? Cite specific evidence to support your thinking.” The bottom of each writing page in the e-notebook includes the following checklist:

    • “State an answer to the question.

    • Cite specific evidence from the texts to support the answer.

    • Check spelling, grammar, and punctuation.”

Indicator 1L
02/02

Materials include explicit instruction of the grade-level grammar and usage standards, with opportunities for application in context.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of Indicator 1l.

Materials provide instruction for all grade-level grammar and usage standards. Student practice opportunities are designed to lead to mastery of the standards. Instruction on grammar and usage occurs in context within anchor reading texts and in grammar lessons provided in the writing block. Student practice is included in Grammar in Context lessons, the Phonics and Word Study Resource Book, and the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook. The Grammar & Spelling Activity Book contains opportunities to further reinforce students’ skills through guided practice, scaffolded learning, independent work, in class or for homework. Students routinely apply grammar and usage standards to their writing. All grammar lessons require students to return to their writing to edit for recently-taught skills, and students edit their writing for appropriate usage. 

Materials include explicit instruction of all grammar and usage standards for the grade level. For example:

  • Explain the function of conjunctions, prepositions, and interjections in general and their function in particular sentences.

    • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher tells students conjunctions combine words, phrases, and clauses. The teacher displays a modeling text and explains how the coordinating conjunctions in the text connect ideas. In partners, students write a sentence with a coordinating conjunction and explain how the conjunction joins ideas. 

    • In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 8, the teacher displays and reads the unedited Modeling Conjunctions and Prepositions Text from previous lessons and models evaluating and revising writing. The teacher says, “I’ll add the proposition “in” to combine these two sentences” and “I think I’ll connect these sentences with “however.” Students work together with partners to revise the sentences in the Practice Conjunctions and Preposition Text. Students also reflect on how conjunctions and prepositions are added to clarify their writing.

    • In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 13, the teacher introduces and reviews interjections and punctuation for effect. Students complete guided practice with partners to circle interjections in sentences and add the correct punctuation for effect. 

  • Form and use the perfect (e.g., I had walked; I have walked; I will have walked) verb tenses.

    • In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher sets the purpose for the lesson saying, “The perfect forms of a verb are used to show completed, or “perfected” actions or conditions. Verbs can be past perfect, present perfect, or future perfect tense. Today I’m going to show you how to form and use the past perfect tense of verbs.” The teacher displays the Verb Tense Chart and discusses the verb tenses, how they are formed and used. Students rewrite a sample sentence using the past perfect tense. Students write three sentences using past, present, and future perfect tense. Students in need of additional practice complete Unit 2, Week 1 Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, in which students rewrite sentences using the indicated perfect tense.

    • In Unit 8, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher reviews past perfect verb tense and guides students through using verb tense to understand the sequence of events. 

      • In the Build-Write-Reflect e-Notebook, Unit 8, Week 2, students write sentences in the past perfect tense.

  • Use verb tense to convey various times, sequences, states, and conditions.

    • In Unit 1, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher is provided with instruction to engage thinking, model verb tense text, and practice verb tense. During guided practice, students circle the verb phrases and identify the verb tenses. Students decide whether the verb is in the present, past, or future tense. 

      • In the Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, Unit 1, Week 1, students write their own sentences using verb tenses to describe when something happened, is happening, or will happen. Students refer to page 4 of the Texts for Close Reading. Students have an instruction paragraph to notice how the verb tense changes from present tense to past perfect tense. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 1, Week 1, students complete the following activity: “Circle the form of the verb that best matches the rest of the sentence.”

    • In Unit 8, Week 3, Lesson 11, the teacher models checking that the verb tense used in unedited writing correctly conveys the time, sequence, state, or condition intended. The teacher models identifying and circling each verb or verb phrase in writing. Students read each other’s drafts and identify verb tense usage. Partners explain instances of correct usage and point out instances where verb tenses could be used more effectively. 

  • Recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb tense.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 11, the teacher sets the purpose for the day’s lesson saying, “It’s important to use the correct tense in your writing so it’s easy for readers to understand what you are trying to communicate. Today we’ll look for inappropriate shifts in verb tense in our own writing and correct it when necessary.” The teacher displays and reads aloud unedited text and models how to edit the text’s first two sentences for inappropriate shifts in verb tense. In partners, students correct the verb tense in the second half of the modeling text. 

    • In Unit 8, Week 3, Lesson 8, the teacher models checking for verb tenses while editing their writing. The teacher circles each verb and verb phrase in the first sentence (had found was) and says, “Now I’m going to use words and phrases that signal time to help me determine if the verbs are in the correct tense. I need to ask myself: did this happen in the past, present, or future? The teacher models analyzing and using the correct verb tense in remaining sentences. Students practice using verb tense text with guided practice. Partners are to work together to revise the sentence to use the correct verb tenses. 

  • Use correlative conjunctions (e.g., either/or, neither/nor).

    • In Unit 7, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher tells students that correlative conjunctions are pairs of words that work together to connect ideas in a sentence, including either/or, neither/nor, and not only/but also. The teacher identifies and discusses correlative conjunctions in a modeling text. Students identify correlative conjunctions in an additional sentence. 

    • In Unit 9, Week 2, Lesson 7, the teacher explains how conjunctions help connect clauses in sentences. The teacher models how to analyze the function of a conjunction. Students apply understanding in the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book and Build-Write-Reflect-e- notebook.

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 9, Week 2, students complete the following activity: “Underline the correlative conjunctions in each sentence. Rewrite each sentence using the correlative conjunctions in ( ).”

  • Use punctuation to separate items in a series.

    • In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 11, the teacher reviews the purpose of commas to separate items in a series or after an introductory phrase. The teacher models how to check a sentence for the correct comma use. In partners, students edit the practice text, correcting comma usage. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 3, Week 3, students complete the following activity: “Rewrite each sentence, using commas to separate items in a series.”

    • No other evidence for using punctuation to separate items in a series was found. There is instruction for the Grade 4 standard of using punctuation for effect. For example:

      • In Unit 7, Week 3, Lesson 5, the teacher models how you think about and annotate the sentences. Students share and reflect on how using punctuation for effect can help them when writing dialogue. 

      • In Unit 8, Week 1, Lesson 8, the teacher provides instruction on punctuation for effect. Commas signal a pause during reading. Students pay attention to punctuation as they draft, revise, and edit their writing.

  • Use a comma to separate an introductory element from the rest of the sentence.

    • In Unit 3, Week 3, Lesson 11, the teacher reminds students that they previously learned how commas are used to separate items in a series and after an introductory phrase. The teacher models how to evaluate and revise their writing to check for correct use of commas saying, “I’ll begin by looking for a series of items and introductory phrases. I noticed that the second sentence begins with an introductory phrase so I probably need to add a comma.” For guided practice, students work with partners to revise sentences for correct comma usage. Students read sentences from their drafts aloud and note places where they pause. Partners talk about whether or not the comma is necessary at the pause point.

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher reviews using a comma to separate a modifying phrase from the rest of the sentence. The teacher displays and discusses modeling text that uses modifying phrases separated by commas, and students identify and discuss modifying phrases in the practice text. For guided practice, students work with partners to read the sentences, identify the modifying phrase in each, and discuss how the modifying phrase further develops the sentence's meaning. During independent writing, students include modifying phrases that will provide additional information to their readers.

  • Use a comma to set off the words yes and no (e.g., Yes, thank you), to set off a tag question from the rest of the sentence (e.g., It’s true, isn’t it?), and to indicate direct address (e.g., Is that you, Steve?).

    • In Unit 4, Week 3, Lesson 8, the teacher tells students to use a comma to set off the yes and no words and indicate a direct address. The teacher displays a text and models revising the text to include correct commas. Students use the practice revision text to add commas to set off yes and no and indicate a direct address. 

    • In Unit 7, Week 3, Lesson 8, the teacher models adding a tag sentence, “I will add a tag question for emphasis. A tag question is a two-part sentence, with one part being positive and the other being negative, with a comma separating the two sentences.” Students revise their writing during independent and small group writing, focusing on using quotation marks and choosing punctuation effectively. 

  • Use underlining, quotation marks, or italics to indicate titles of works.

    • In Unit 8, Week 1, Lesson 6, the teacher tells students that when they cite the title of a book, they must use underline or italics, and when they cite a magazine article, they must use quotation marks for the title. Students practice using correct punctuation citing titles in their research project. 

    • In Unit 9, Week 3, Lesson 7, students utilize text features to add to their understanding.

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 9, Week 3, students complete the following activity: “Rewrite the sentences using quotation marks or underlining for titles.”

  • Spell grade-appropriate words correctly, consulting references as needed.

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Lesson 1, Phonics and Word Study Resource Book, the teacher writes metal, travel, April, dollar, spider, and color. The teacher reviews words with unaccented final syllables and underlines the final syllable in each word. Students sort a list of words into a chart headed al, el, il, ar, er, and or. Students complete a spelling pre-assessment of unaccented final syllable words and sort the words into the spelling chart. 

    • In the Spelling Reference Guide, during mini-lessons, students explore a variety of spelling reference material, look up words in a dictionary, and use a word’s definition to help check and correct spellings.

  • Expand, combine, and reduce sentences for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style.

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Lesson 14, the teacher models reducing sentences too long and difficult to read. The teacher displays the unedited modeling text and explains how to identify a run-on sentence and reduce it. In partners, students use the practice text to reduce and edit a sentence. 

      • In the Grammar and Spelling Activity Book, Unit 7, Week 1, students complete the following activity: “Read the first and second sentences. On the line, write whether the second sentence reduces, expands, or combines the first sentence(s).”

  • Compare and contrast the varieties of English (e.g., dialects, registers) used in stories, dramas, or poems.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 7, the teacher models comparing and contrasting varieties of English by displaying and discussing the close reading question: “Reread paragraphs 7 and 10-15. Compare the narrative voice in paragraph 7 to the dialect used by the boys in paragraphs 10-15. Cite specific evidence from the text to describe how these differences in language affect the overall tone of the scene.”

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Lesson 12, the teacher indicates students will “compare and contrast styles of language used” in a letter and in a speech. The teacher points out the use of a formal register in the letter, and students annotate the text to show the varieties of English.

  • Materials include authentic opportunities for students to demonstrate application of skills in context, including applying grammar and convention skills to writing. For example:

    • In Unit 6, Week 2, Lesson 13, the teacher reminds students to check their spelling during their independent writing time.

    • In Unit 8, Week 3, Lesson 8, during independent writing, students revise or edit their writing, being mindful of standard grammar rules such as inappropriate shifts in verb tense and other uses of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

    • In Unit 10, Week 2, Lesson 11, students use an editing checklist to edit a model poem and their own poem for the format, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 

Indicator 1M
02/02

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to interact and build key academic vocabulary words in and across texts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 1m. 

The Program Support Guide provides a one-page Year-Long Vocabulary Development Plan which provides the focus word list for each week. Vocabulary relates to the Unit’s theme or topic and appears in the texts and activities students engage in during the lessons. Each unit focuses on different types of vocabulary development including Language of Instruction, General and Domain-Specific Vocabulary, and Word Study/Spelling. Within these focuses, students have opportunities to work with vocabulary including, but not limited to, context clues, determining meaning through roots and affixes, drawing, and acting out words. The digital Program Support Guide includes an expanded version of the Vocabulary Development Plan. Anchor text and close reading texts have selected vocabulary identified and provide brief opportunities for students to define and/or exemplify the words. Vocabulary is explicitly taught before reading each anchor text in various ways.

The Additional Materials section provides several graphic organizers such as a Concept Map or Frayer Model for vocabulary acquisition. Materials also provide a Vocabulary Development Tool that includes graphic organizers and a one-page explanation of the Define/Example/Ask routine which is the main vocabulary routine highlighted in each unit. Materials also provide a Multilingual Glossary that includes a definition, example, and image for each of the focus words for the units. 

Materials provide teacher guidance outlining a cohesive year-long vocabulary development component. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a year-long vocabulary development plan which lists the explicitly taught words by units and weeks. The list identifies the words as Tier 2 or Tier 3 words. While this document is labeled as a plan, it is a one-page list of words per unit.

  • The digital Program Support Guide includes an expanded version of the Vocabulary Development Plan. This plan highlights the vocabulary development research base and the key types of vocabulary instruction used in the materials.

  • The Teacher’s Resource System includes a Vocabulary Development section for each unit. This section provides a two-page overview of the Build Knowledge Word Bank, Language of Instruction, General Academic and Domain-Specific words, graphic organizers, and Word Study/Spelling supports. The Build Knowledge Word Bank lists the words that are explicitly taught in the first lesson of each unit and repeated throughout. The Vocabulary Development section also provides a chart that includes the Tier 2 and Tier 3 words that are found in each text. Materials highlight words that are explicitly taught at the beginning of each week and include images of the graphic organizers used to teach these words. Each identified word also includes the page number on which it appears in the student text. 

  • Materials provide a Vocabulary Development Tools resource. This resource contains printable vocabulary tools, including an analogy graphic organizer, a concept map, a Frayer model, a vocabulary word study log, vocabulary routines, and making meaning with words. There are two protocols in the Vocabulary Routine section: Define/Example/Ask and a Kate Kinsella routine. During the Kate Kinsella routine, the teacher introduces the word and provides verbal practice for students, and then students engage in written practice. 

  • Materials include Vocabulary Routines that the teacher can use to introduce vocabulary words. The routine that is stated in the teacher lesson plans is Define/Example/Ask; however teachers can choose to use the Academic Vocabulary Routine provided in Vocabulary Routines. While the directions for these routines state that teachers should review vocabulary every day, the actual lesson plan does not allot time or provide guidance on vocabulary review other than in the lessons where vocabulary is introduced or when the skill is vocabulary-related. Additionally, teacher guidance for using vocabulary words that are not explicitly taught is unclear.

Vocabulary is repeated in contexts (before texts, in texts) and across multiple texts.

  • The Vocabulary Development Plan notes that the Build Knowledge Vocabulary “words and phrases may or may not appear in the unit texts that students read. They were chosen to provide conceptual language that supports the unit topic and Enduring Understandings and for students to use as they communicate and grow their word knowledge within and across grades.” For example, in Unit 5, Unit Resources, Vocabulary Development, the Building Knowledge vocabulary words and phrases are industry, manufacture, progress, process, production, and revolution. The phrase mass production appears in “Technology and the Lowell Mill Girls” by Anonymous and Marshall Putnam Thompson and revolutionized appears in “The Making of the Industrial Age” by Kathy Furgang. Industry, manufacture, progress, and process do not appear in any of the unit texts that students read.  

  • In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 1, during Build Vocabulary/Preview the Text, the teacher introduces four vocabulary words using the Define/Example/Ask Routine. Students will encounter these words as they read “Ready to Race” (author not cited). The teacher guide states, “Tell students that during independent time, they will encounter the Week 2 words again by reading the Vocabulary Practice Text on page 17 of the Texts for Close Reading and by completing vocabulary activities in their Build-Reflect-Write e-notebooks.” Some of these activities include answering vocabulary questions related to the Vocabulary Practice Text, answering questions connected to students’ experiences with the vocabulary words, drawing out words, and writing a riddle with a vocabulary word.

  • In Unit 9, the focus is on The Economic Development of Cities. In Week 1, Lesson 10, students read the text, “Chicago: An American Hub,” by Ena Kao and encounter the word vibrant in context. In Week 2, Lesson 1, the teacher explicitly teaches the word vibrancy and students encounter the word as they read the text, “The Great Migration and the Growth of Cities” by Monica Halpern. 

Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and to high-value academic words (e.g., words that might appear in other contexts/content areas). 

  • In each unit, the Vocabulary Development tab within Unit Resources illustrates the vocabulary terms students will cover. Materials note that the Build Knowledge Word Bank terms “are explicitly introduced in Mini-Lesson 1, practiced each week in Texts from Close Reading “Build Vocabulary” activities, and used orally and in writing as students construct the Knowledge Blueprint, discuss the Essential Question and Enduring Understandings, and complete-building tasks.” The General Academic and Domain-Specific words “appear in this unit’s Texts for Close Reading selections. Highlighted words are explicitly taught during First Reading mini-lessons each week. Students encounter these words again as they read the weekly Vocabulary Practice Texts.” Because explicit instruction focuses on the highlighted words, many of the General Academic and Domain-Specific words listed are not addressed. 

  • Each unit includes a Vocabulary Practice Text for each week. This short new text focuses on some of the vocabulary words from the anchor texts. Students read these texts independently and complete vocabulary tasks in their Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebooks.

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, students engage in a mini-lesson where they read a section of “The US Constitution: Then and Now” (author not cited). At the beginning of this mini-lesson, the teacher uses the Define/Example/Protocol to introduce several vocabulary words, such as amend, factor, and petition. The teacher defines amend as “To amend something is to change it.” Then, the teacher provides an example, “As I learn new details, I may amend my ideas.” Finally, the teacher asks students to turn and talk to their neighbor to answer the question, “What is something you could amend?”

Criterion 1.3: Foundational Skills

08/08

Materials in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language targeted to support foundational reading development are aligned to the standards.

Materials provide a consistent progression of phonics and word recognition lessons over the course of the year, including a Scope and Sequence of phonics and word recognition skills and Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Checks that assess a range of phonics and word recognition skills. Materials include tasks and questions that provide opportunities for students to access different foundational skills within the anchor texts and supporting texts. Materials include explicit instruction, modeling, and student practice in all areas of fluency. The materials include explicit instructional routines for rate, accuracy, and expression, including teacher modeling and student practice.

Indicator 1N
04/04

Materials, questions, and tasks address grade-level foundational skills by providing explicit instruction in phonics, word analysis, and word recognition that demonstrate a research-based progression.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of Indicator 1n.

Grade 5 materials provide a consistent progression of phonics and word recognition lessons over the course of the year. The materials include a Scope and Sequence of phonics and word recognition skills and Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Checks that assess a range of phonics and word recognition skills. The materials indicate that the Quick Checks may be given at the beginning, middle, and end of the year or as needed to inform core instruction or intervention. Tasks and questions in the materials progress in a logical sequence that leads to the application of skills. Materials provide explicit instruction in grade-level phonics and word recognition skills and provide regular practice decoding multisyllabic words using a repeating Reading Big Words Strategy. Routines for decoding and building automaticity of reading multisyllabic words occur in each unit. Teachers use assessments to drive instruction and to help students make progress toward mastery. While all necessary assessment components are present, navigation of the multitude of related but separate assessment pieces is not streamlined. Teachers monitor students’ writing for phonics skills and provide additional instruction and practice, as needed.

Materials contain explicit instruction of irregularly spelled words, syllabication patterns, and word recognition consistently over the course of the year. For example:

  • Use combined knowledge of all letter-sound correspondences, syllabication patterns, and morphology (e.g., roots and affixes) to read accurately unfamiliar multisyllabic words in context and out of context.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 2, the teacher guides students through reading the accountable text “Danger Offshore” to focus on reading words with open syllables. The teacher models the decoding skill, and students circle five words with open syllables. 

    • In Unit 8, Week 2, Phonics and Word Study, Lesson 1, the teacher introduces the Latin roots aud, vis, form, cede. The teacher reads each root and explains the meaning. The teacher writes eight words with the roots and asks students to copy the words, read them aloud, and underline each root. Students read 50 words, first to the teacher and then independently. Students underline each root word. The sheet contains an additional 50 words for practice. 

    • In Additional Resources, the materials provide an instructional routine for decoding multisyllabic words, the Reading Big Words Strategy. The steps in this strategy include the following: look for common prefixes and/or suffixes, look at the base word and use knowledge of syllable types and spelling patterns to read it, sound out and blend together all of the word parts, repeat the word, adjusting pronunciation to account for unaccented syllables, check the word in the sentence to see if it makes sense. 

All tasks and questions are sequenced to application of grade-level work (e.g., application of prefixes at the end of the unit/year; decoding multi-syllable words). For example: *Note: Look for the sequence of skills over the course of the year

  • In the Scope and Sequence, the materials outline the following sequence of phonics and word study skills: long and short vowels, r-controlled vowels, syllable types, homographs, variant vowels, noun suffixes, Latin roots, adjective suffixes, inflectional endings, plurals, Greek and Latin science roots. For example:

    • In the Scope and Sequence, Units 1 and 2 review short, long, and r-controlled vowels as well as closed and open syllables. 

    • In the Scope and Sequence, Unit 8 introduces Latin roots, adjective suffixes; Unit 9 introduces inflectional endings and prefixes; and Unit 10 introduces Greek and Latin science roots and science prefixes. 

  • In My Word Study Book 2, Unit 7, Week 2, students underline the prefixes re-, pre-, dis-, or mis-. Students pronounce each word with the teacher, practice reading the word independently, and read with a partner.

Multiple assessment opportunities are provided over the course of the year to inform instructional adjustments of phonics, word recognition, and word analysis to help students make progress toward mastery. For example:

  • In Assessments, Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Checks, the materials include 116 Quick Check assessments. The materials contain a Quick Check to Intervention Resource Map that indicates which intervention lessons correspond to specific Quick Check skills. 

  • In Phonics and Word Recognition Quick Checks, Quick Check 97, students choose the correct suffix to add to a base word in a sentence. Students choose from five suffixes and complete ten words.

  • In Unit 2, Teacher’s Resource System, Intervention and Reteaching Resources, a guide indicates phonics and word recognition quick checks assessment results for controlled vowels, closed and open syllables, correlate to re-teaching phonics and word recognition Lessons 1-3.

  • In Phonics and Word Study Resource Book, Unit 10 Cumulative Assessment, students complete a spelling and dictation assessment. Teachers use assessments to drive instruction and help students make progress toward mastery. Teachers monitor students’ writing for phonics skills and provide additional instruction and practice as needed.

Indicator 1O
02/02

Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply grade-level phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of Indicator 1o.

Grade 5 materials offer opportunities for students to apply grade-level phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills. Materials include tasks and questions that provide opportunities for students to access different foundational skills within the anchor texts and supporting texts. The weekly lesson pattern includes independent practice using a word study text that contains words targeting the week’s phonics or word analysis skill. Phonics and word analysis lessons provide students an opportunity to apply the skill to the core text with teacher guidance. During recurring weekly phonics and word study lessons two and three, students engage in two readings of the week’s accountable text targeting newly-taught or reviewed skills.

Multiple and varied opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to learn, practice, and apply phonics, word analysis, and word recognition skills in connected tasks. For example:

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 5, students practice dividing words with vowel-r patterns into syllables. The teacher guides students through dividing five words with vowel-r patterns into syllables. During independent work time, students read “Susan B. Anthony” “to develop fluency and automaticity with vowel-r syllable words.” Materials indicate teachers continue focusing on vowel-r patterns “during both whole-and small-group-time, as needed.”

  • In Unit 7, Week 3, Lesson 2, students independently read “Young Patriots” in the Word Study e-book to develop fluency and automaticity with words with silent letters kn, wr, gh, gn, and wh. The teacher reminds students to monitor their accuracy using what they know about word families and syllable types.

  • In Unit 9, Week 3, Lesson 2, the teacher models using the Reading Big Words Strategy to pronounce words with prefixes: pro-, em-, en-, per-, im-. The teacher displays words: proceed, employed, enlisted, performance, immigrating and circles the prefix in each word, explaining how the prefix changes the meaning of the word. During guided practice, students work in pairs to search for words in a print or online dictionary and add them to a 5-column chart with categories: pro-, em-, en-, per-, im-. When finished students add words to the class list, the teacher guides students to read the words generated during the lesson.

Materials include tasks and questions that provide opportunities for students to access different foundational skills within the anchor text and supporting texts. For example:

  • In Unit 1, Week 2, Lesson 2, students review long vowel syllable patterns using “A Short History of a Special Plant” on pages 12-16 of Cultivating Natural Resources. The teacher displays words: humor, elevate, provide, breeding, propose and models flexible use of syllable division, dividing words after the first vowel or consonant. The teacher circles the long vowel syllables in each word and reviews that words with the VCV syllable pattern often have long vowel sounds. Students chorally read paragraph 2 of “Clean Burning Coal Is America’s Future.” The teacher models analyzing the word sustainable using knowledge of long vowel patterns and context clues. Students apply understanding of long vowel syllable patterns while reading “A Tale of Three Sisters” in the Word Study e-book.

  • In Unit 5, Week 3, Lesson 2, after a lesson on homophones, students read the first paragraph of the core text, “The Making of the Industrial Age”, which contains the words way, affected, their would, and which. Students read the text chorally, and the teacher pauses to model decoding and determining the meaning of the word affected. Students read the word study text “Samuel Morse: Inventor and Artist”, independently to gain fluency and automaticity with homophones

  • In Unit 10, Week 2, Lesson 5, the teacher models dividing VCV words. Students practice reading six words and breaking them “into syllables or manageable chunks.” During independent work time students read, “A Tale of Three Sisters”, to “develop fluency and automaticity with long vowel syllable pattern words.”

Indicator 1P
02/02

Instructional opportunities are frequently built into the materials for students to practice and achieve reading fluency in order to read with purpose and understanding.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of Indicator 1p.

Grade 5 materials include explicit instruction, modeling, and student practice in all areas of fluency. The materials include explicit instructional routines for rate, accuracy, and expression, including teacher modeling and student practice. Students engage in multiple readings of the core text and accountable texts each week. The materials support using context and decoding strategies to confirm understanding and word meaning. The materials indicate how to use quick checks to determine fluency. A resource map suggests Instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery of fluency. The resource map references specific lessons to focus on reading with understanding, intonation, and expression. 

Multiple opportunities are provided over the course of the year in core materials for students to demonstrate sufficient accuracy and fluency in oral and silent reading. For example:

  • Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.

    • In Unit 1, Week 3, Phonics and Word Study, Lesson 2, the teacher guides students through a whisper read of the accountable text “Intergalactic Space Force.” Students read the text chorally. The teacher asks students comprehension questions about the text. Students respond and underline words and phrases in the text to support their answers.

    • In Unit 6, Week 1, Phonics and Word Study, Lesson 2, the teacher guides students through a whisper read of the accountable text “The Crow and the Pitcher.” Next, students read the text chorally. The teacher asks students comprehension questions about the text. Students respond and underline words and phrases in the text to support their answers. 

Materials support reading of prose and poetry with attention to rate, accuracy, and expression, as well as direction for students to apply reading skills when productive struggle is necessary. For example: 

  • Read grade-level prose and poetry orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.

    • In Unit 1, Additional Resources, Instructional Routines and Strategies, the materials provide instructional routines in areas of fluency: Inflection/Intonation - Pitch, Volume, Stress; Speed/Pacing - Slow, Varied, Fast; Dramatic Expression - Characterization/Feelings, Anticipation/Mood; Phrasing - Units of Meaning in Complex Sentences, Dependent Clauses; Confirm or Correct Word Recognition and Understanding; Short Pauses; Full Stops; High-Frequency Word Phrases. Each routine includes teacher modeling along with explicit instruction and student practice. 

    • In Unit 1, Week 3, Lesson 12, students read “A Girl’s Garden.” The teacher models identifying the features and structures of poems. In partners, students read aloud lines 25-44 of the poem, annotating the features and structures of poetry they encounter. Students reread the poem with a partner to build fluency or listen to the audio recording during independent time.

    • In Reader’s Theater Handbook, Unit 2, Lesson 5, students perform the script, and the teacher notes students’ “fluency and phrasing, intonation, pacing, accuracy, and expression.”

Materials support students’ fluency development of reading skills (e.g., self-correction of word recognition and/or for understanding, focus on rereading) over the course of the year (to get to the end of the grade-level band). For example:

  • Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as necessary.

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Lesson 2, during independent work time, students read with a focus of fluency and automaticity, monitoring “to make sure they read words correctly, using what they know about word families and syllable types.”

    • In Unit 5, Week 2, Lesson 2, the teacher models decoding and context clues to determine the pronunciation and meaning of the word invention in a second reading of the core text. The teacher models identifying the prefix in- and using it to decode the word. The teacher models using context to determine the meaning of the word. 

    • In Instructional Routines, Fluency Routines, the teacher uses a routine to guide students to read words correctly and make “sure that the words they read make sense in context.” The routine includes the teacher modeling how to confirm the meaning of a word, students choral-reading the same section, and students rereading the text while paying “attention to word parts.”

Assessment materials provide teachers and students with information of students’ current fluency skills and provide teachers with instructional adjustments to help students make progress toward mastery of fluency. For example:

  • In Planning Your Yearly Assessments, Grade 5, teachers are directed to administer Fluency Quick Checks “at the beginning of the year to gauge baseline Fluency and to inform your instructional decisions. These should be administered 3 times a year, at the beginning, middle, and end, to monitor progress and employ next steps for instruction. There are next steps at the end of the Fluency Quick Checks.”

  • In Assessments, Fluency Quick Checks, the materials include ten Grade 5 assessment passages that can be used to assess oral reading accuracy, reading rate, and fluency (phrasing, intonation, and expression). The passages are identified by Lexile, and students read passages at their instructional reading level. For example:

    • In Fluency Quick Check #46, A Big Scoop, students complete a fluency quick check with the teacher on how many words read per line. Students are also required to tell how they know. To determine fluency mastery, students are assessed on oral reading accuracy, reading rate (words per minute), and comprehension.

    • In Fluency Quick Check #47, Cutting Down on Trash, students complete a fluency quick check with the teacher on how many words read per line. To determine fluency mastery, students are assessed on oral reading accuracy, reading rate (words per minute), and comprehension.

  • In Assessments, Fluency, the Fluency Quick Check Resource Map provides a map of fluency intervention lessons that match each fluency skill and quick check. The directions for assessment outline how to assess each skill and determine whether a student needs intervention lessons. 

  • In Assessments, Fluency Quick Checks, the Additional Teacher Resources section contains alternate fluency assessments, including fluency rubrics, fluency self-assessments, reader’s theater self-assessments, performance assessments, and oral presentation assessments. 

Overview of Gateway 2

Building Knowledge with Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks

The majority of texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels, and materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards, including explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the standards. Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time.

Criterion 2.1: Building Knowledge

22/24

Materials build knowledge through integrated reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language.

The majority of texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including “Government and Citizenship,” “Perspectives in Literature,” and “Earth Science.” Materials include anchor texts with accompanying Mini-Lessons in which students discuss and write their answers to text- dependent questions or tasks that address word choice, text structure, academic and figurative language, main ideas, and key details of the text. Materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Students learn about a topic or theme that is integrated throughout close readings and knowledge building texts; however, access to knowledge building texts cannot be ensured for all students as these readings occur during small group instruction. Most culminating tasks involve multiple literacy skills; however, the tasks follow a standard format that does not vary across the year. Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards, including explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the standards. Materials include both short embedded research tasks and longer research projects.

Indicator 2A
02/04

Texts are organized around a cohesive topic(s) to build students’ ability to read and comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2a.

The majority of texts are organized around a topic to build students’ knowledge and vocabulary, which over time, supports and helps grow students’ ability to comprehend complex texts independently and proficiently; however, some units focus on a theme rather than a topic. The K–6 program focuses on ten knowledge strands that repeat across grade levels and addresses topics including “Government and Citizenship,” “Perspectives in Literature,” and “Earth Science.” Topics and themes are vertically aligned across K–6 to support knowledge building from year to year. Each unit lasts three weeks and contains Shared Reading, Mentor Reading, and Extended Reading texts related to the same topic; however, without using the small group Knowledge Building texts, which cannot be guaranteed for all students, students do not read enough texts to build knowledge of the unit topics. During whole group instruction, students engage in reading, writing, and discussion around the topic or theme and essential questions throughout each unit. Each unit includes a Knowledge Blueprint that serves as an anchor document throughout the unit. Tasks and questions are designed to build knowledge of the topic or theme throughout the unit to help students complete the Knowledge Blueprint.

Some texts are connected by a grade-appropriate cohesive topic/line of inquiry. Some texts build knowledge and the ability to read and comprehend complex texts across a school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 1, texts are organized around the topic, “Cultivating Natural Resources.” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate that the unit “explores the role of plants in the development of modern society. It focuses on plant structure and function, the cultivation of crops and technological advances in plant technology, and differing opinions about the use of plant resources.” Students read informational and opinion texts to answer the unit essential question “How do we decide which resources we should develop?” The texts support the Enduring Understandings for Unit 1: “All animals, including humans, directly or indirectly depend on plants to convert the sun's energy into food. As scientific knowledge and technology progresses, the ways in which people develop natural resources changes. Human development of resources has a lasting impact on the natural world. There are costs and benefits to developing resources.” Texts in the unit include, but are not limited to:

    • In Week 1, students read “The Structure of Corn'' by Matthew Felkonian and “The Future of a Crop'' by Amelia Millilo to answer the question, “What are the different ways people have used corn plants over time?” Students add to the Knowledge Blueprint to answer the following questions: “Why is corn an important resource for people? How has the way we develop natural resources like corn changed over time? What effect has resource development had on communities and the natural world?” 

    • In Week 2, students reread a section of “The Future of Crops'' (author not cited) and complete the extended read “A Short History of a Special Plant” by Laura McDonald. Students “[i]ntegrate information from both texts about how hybrid corn has helped the United States.” 

    • In Week 3, after reading “The Science of Growing Corn” by Carol Corriols, which shares two opposing opinions about cultivating corn. Students add to their Knowledge Blueprints and then discuss what they have learned with regard to the essential question and understandings. 

  • In Unit 8, texts are organized around the topic, “Water: Fact or Fiction” to answer the essential question, “What does water mean to people and the societies they live in?” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate the purpose of the texts in this unit is to explore “the role of water, and its value to societies, through literary fiction and nonfiction pop science Q and A articles.” 

    • In Week 1, the short reads include “The Odyssey Begins,” a brief fiction excerpt from Homer’s Odyssey by Mary Pope Osborne that shows how water shaped a journey. The second read is “Water-Wise Landscaper” by Climate Kids and Michelle Pekko-Seymoure, a Q & A interview with a landscaper on how to conserve water when planting in desert regions. Students begin the Knowledge Blueprint to understand what water means to people and societies. 

    • In Week 2, Extended Read 1 is “The Voyage” another excerpt from Homer’s Odyssey.” This excerpt gives additional explanation on how ancient cultures viewed water. 

    • In Week 3, the Extended Read 2 is “Questions and Answers About the Oceans” by Climate Kids and Michelle Pekko-Seymoure. This text explains how Earth’s oceans help balance systems on earth. The unit finishes with a read aloud of the poem “Burn Lake” by Carrie Fountain. 

Some texts are connected by a theme. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 4, texts are organized around the topic, “Recognizing Author’s Point of View.” In the Building Knowledge Plan Year-Long Plans, publishers indicate the unit purpose: “The poems and historical fiction excerpts selected for this literature unit allow students to build knowledge about some of the many uniquely American voices in literature, build knowledge about the past, and reflect on how these voices still resonate today.” The texts examine the essential question, “How can other perspectives help us evaluate the world?” The texts support the Enduring Understandings for Unit 4: “Every work of poetry or prose has a distinct point of view, perspective, purpose, and theme(s). A narrator’s or speaker’s point of view and perspective influences how events are described and perceived. People of different genders, cultures, or perspectives may experience the same events or interactions differently. Reading about an event through another’s viewpoint offers readers an opportunity to build social awareness and expand their understanding of different perspectives, cultures, and contexts.” Texts in this unit include, but are not limited to:

    • In Week 1, students read I Hear America Singing by Walt Whitman and Caged Bird by Maya Angelou. Students add to their Knowledge Blueprint on the author's point of view, perspective, purpose, and how they can learn from that perspective. Students read Gold Country by Laurence Yep and add to their Knowledge Blueprint. After discussing their Knowledge Blueprint, students begin writing a fictional narrative and working on their culminating task, which is writing a summary.

    • In Week 2, students read I Speak Spanish Too by Maria Mahia. This selection focuses on perspective and story structure.  

    • In Week 3, students read “Miguel’s Prophecy” from Esperanza Rising by Pam Muñoz Ryan. Students discuss their Knowledge Blueprint and complete their culminating project—writing interview questions for a historical figure that they read about. Students demonstrate their knowledge of the essential question and enduring understandings as they independently write one to two paragraphs in response to prompts.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.

Materials include anchor texts with accompanying Mini-Lessons in which students discuss and write their answers to text- dependent questions or tasks that address word choice, text structure, academic and figurative language, main ideas, and key details of the text. Within the Mini-Lesson students frequently hold Constructive Conversations which include text-based prompts. Daily lessons, close-reading texts, and the student e-Notebook include opportunities for students to respond to questions. While questions support the Common Core State Standards, materials do not present the questions in a sequenced manner that supports students delving deeper into texts or increasing the level of rigor over the span of a lesson, unit, or school year. Additionally, the questions and tasks associated with the texts within the lesson and the e-notebook are not tagged to standards and do not always reflect the skill focus of the lesson. Without standard alignment or intentional sequencing, the questions do not clearly support a progression to mastery.

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will compare and contrast the overall structure of concepts in two texts.  While students identify chronological elements of the structure and explain how the structure helped them understand the order of events in the text, students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the overall structure of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts,” as required by the standards. For example:

    • In Week 1, Lesson 4, students explain the relationship between chronological events in a text. The teacher models how to use dates and specific time-order words or phrases to find chronology. During Guided Practice, students work in small groups while reading paragraph 3 of “The U.S. Constitution: Then and Now” by Benjamin Godfrey and underlining time-order words and phrases. Students explain how the chronological structure helped them understand the order of events in the text. During Apply Understanding, students independently reread paragraphs 4–5 and underline time-order words. Students write the chronological relationship described and the signal language that helps them recognize the structure. Students retell the events in chronological order.

  • In Unit 10, the Strategies and Skills page in the Teacher Resource System indicates that the unit will introduce the skill of explaining the relationship between individuals, concepts, and events in a text. Although students examine two different texts on the same topic, students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the overall structure (e.g., chronology, comparison, cause/effect, problem/solution) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts,” as required by the standards. For example:

    • In Week 1, students read John Dalton: Father of Atomic Theory” by Kathy Furgang. In Lesson 4, without prior teacher modeling, students work with a partner during the Constructive Conversation to answer the question, “How does Democritus' theory of atoms relate to Dalton's atomic theory? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” During independent work, the teacher asks students to write a response to the following prompt: “How does Dalton's atomic theory relate to modern science? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” 

    • In Week 2, students use this skill again when reading “Changes in Matter” by Laura McDonald. In Lesson 10, students discuss the following Constructive Conversation prompt: “Identify the relationship between the procedure on page 16 and energy. Is this procedure an example of a physical change or a chemical change? Cite specific text evidence to support your answer.” During independent work, students write a response to the Apply Understanding question: “Identify the relationship between the steps of the procedure on page 16 and the result. Would changing the procedure result in a physical change or chemical change? Cite specific text evidence to support your answer.”

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 4, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will describe how a narrator’s point of view influences events are described. For example: 

    • In Week 3, Lesson 4, students describe how a narrator’s point of view influences how events are described. During the Constructive Conversation, students work with a partner on the following task: “In “Miguel’s Prophecy,” how does the author’s use of point of view influence how the challenges of migrating to the United States are described? Cite specific evidence from the text to support your answer.” During Apply Understanding, students independently respond to the following question: “If the author of “Gold Country” used the same point of view as “Miguel’s Prophecy,” how might the description of Runt’s meeting the Australian boy change?”

  • In Unit 7,  the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will compare and contrast the overall structure of events in two or more texts. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 8, students compare and contrast the overall structure of events in two or more texts. During the Constructive Conversation, students work with a partner to respond to the following prompt: “How do the structures of ‘Native Americans in the Revolution’ and ‘The Banners of Freedom’ help deepen your understanding of how the American Revolution affected people’s lives? Cite specific evidence from the text to support your thinking.” During Apply Understanding, students independently respond to the following question: “Compare and contrast the structures of ‘Road to Revolution’ and ‘The Banners of Freedom.’ How do these different structures help explain some of the effects of the American Revolution? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.”

Indicator 2B
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the key ideas, details, craft, and structure within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2b.

Materials include anchor texts with accompanying Mini-Lessons in which students discuss and write their answers to text- dependent questions or tasks that address word choice, text structure, academic and figurative language, main ideas, and key details of the text. Within the Mini-Lesson students frequently hold Constructive Conversations which include text-based prompts. Daily lessons, close-reading texts, and the student e-Notebook include opportunities for students to respond to questions. Strategies and Skills incorporate the language of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Most questions and tasks fully align to the Strategies and Skills and correlated standard, while other questions and tasks partially align to the correlated standard. 

For most texts, students analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will compare and contrast the overall structure of concepts in two texts. While students identify chronological elements of the structure and explain how the structure helped them understand the order of events in the text, students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the overall structure of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts,” as required by the standards. For example:

    • In Week 1, Lesson 4, students explain the relationship between chronological events in a text. The teacher models how to use dates and specific time-order words or phrases to find chronology. During Guided Practice, students work in small groups while reading paragraph 3 of “The U.S. Constitution: Then and Now” by Benjamin Godfrey and underlining time-order words and phrases. Students explain how the chronological structure helped them understand the order of events in the text. During Apply Understanding, students independently reread paragraphs 4–5 and underline time-order words. Students write the chronological relationship described and the signal language that helps them recognize the structure. Students retell the events in chronological order.

  • In Unit 10, the Strategies and Skills page in the Teacher Resource System indicates that the unit will introduce the skill of explaining the relationship between individuals, concepts, and events in a text. Although students examine two different texts on the same topic, students do not “[c]ompare and contrast the overall structure (e.g., chronology, comparison, cause/effect, problem/solution) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts,” as required by the standards. For example:

    • In Week 1, students read John Dalton: Father of Atomic Theory” by Kathy Furgang. In Lesson 4, without prior teacher modeling, students work with a partner during the Constructive Conversation to answer the question, “How does Democritus' theory of atoms relate to Dalton's atomic theory? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” During independent work, the teacher asks students to write a response to the following prompt: “How does Dalton's atomic theory relate to modern science? Emphasize the importance of chronology in your answer.” 

    • In Week 2, students use this skill again when reading “Changes in Matter” by Laura McDonald. In Lesson 10, students discuss the following Constructive Conversation prompt: “Identify the relationship between the procedure on page 16 and energy. Is this procedure an example of a physical change or a chemical change? Cite specific text evidence to support your answer.” During independent work, students write a response to the Apply Understanding question: “Identify the relationship between the steps of the procedure on page 16 and the result. Would changing the procedure result in a physical change or chemical change? Cite specific text evidence to support your answer.”

For most texts, students analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 4, the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will describe how a narrator’s point of view influences events are described. For example: 

    • In Week 3, Lesson 4, students describe how a narrator’s point of view influences how events are described. During the Constructive Conversation, students work with a partner on the following task: “In “Miguel’s Prophecy,” how does the author’s use of point of view influence how the challenges of migrating to the United States are described? Cite specific evidence from the text to support your answer.” During Apply Understanding, students independently respond to the following question: “If the author of “Gold Country” used the same point of view as “Miguel’s Prophecy,” how might the description of Runt’s meeting the Australian boy change?”

  • In Unit 7,  the Strategies and Skills page of the Teacher Resource System indicates that students will compare and contrast the overall structure of events in two or more texts. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 8, students compare and contrast the overall structure of events in two or more texts. During the Constructive Conversation, students work with a partner to respond to the following prompt: “How do the structures of ‘Native Americans in the Revolution’ and ‘The Banners of Freedom’ help deepen your understanding of how the American Revolution affected people’s lives? Cite specific evidence from the text to support your thinking.” During Apply Understanding, students independently respond to the following question: “Compare and contrast the structures of ‘Road to Revolution’ and ‘The Banners of Freedom.’ How do these different structures help explain some of the effects of the American Revolution? Support your answer with specific evidence from the text.”

Indicator 2C
04/04

Materials require students to analyze the integration of knowledge within individual texts as well as across multiple texts using coherently sequenced, high quality text-specific and/or text-dependent questions and tasks.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2c.

Materials provide opportunities for students to answer questions that support knowledge building. Each instructional day includes a reading mini-lesson designed to build content knowledge and practice literacy skills and strategies using the anchor texts. Each week, the student e-book also includes a Build Knowledge Across Texts question in which students respond to a prompt to synthesize information or analyze multiple texts. The majority of questions included in the Constructive Conversation, Apply Understanding, and Build Knowledge sections require students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas within individual texts, as well as across multiple texts. Questions connect to topics or themes and texts for each unit, allowing for analysis through discussion and writing tasks. Materials provide questions and prompts in direct teaching mini-lessons, small group or paired tasks, and independent work time. 

Most sets of questions and tasks support students’ analysis of knowledge and ideas. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will analyze how visual elements contribute to meaning and tone. For example:

    • In Week 1, Lesson 13, during Guided Practice, students work with a partner to analyze an illustration in “Grandpop’s Surprise” by Jason Reynolds and “The Drive Down” by Jason Reynolds. The teacher guides students “to think about how the character is feeling and how they came to that conclusion by using the illustration.” During Apply Understanding, students independently look at the illustrations in “The Drive Down” by Jason Reynolds and write 3–4 sentences analyzing how the illustrations add to the tone and meaning of the story.

  • In Unit 9, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will explain how an author uses reasons and evidence. For example:

    • In Week 3, Lesson 4, students read “Old Cities Revitalize” by Alexandra Hanson-Harding and focus on explaining how the author uses reasons and evidence. In the Constructive Conversation section, students discuss their responses to the following question, “How does the section ‘Baltimore, Maryland: Putting Out the Welcome Mat’ support the author’s claim that ‘some urban areas are beginning to turn around’? Cite specific reasons and evidence from this section to support your answer.” Students then share and reflect on how examining the author’s claims helped their understanding of the topic of urban development. During independent work time, students practice with a similar task. In the Apply Understanding section, students write a response to the following prompt: “How does the section ‘Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Goes Green’ support the author’s claim that ‘cities are acting creatively to revitalize their downtowns and attract new businesses and residents?’ Cite specific reasons and evidence from the text to support your answer.”

Most sets of questions and tasks provide opportunities to analyze across multiple texts as well as within single texts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 1, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will integrate information from several texts on the same topic. For example:

    • In Week 2, Lesson 12, the teacher models how to answer the following question: “Reread paragraphs 3–4 in ‘The Structure of a Corn Plant’ and paragraphs 4–5 from ‘A Short History of a Special Plant.’ Integrate information from both texts to describe how the corn’s stalk helps the corn plant grow and stay healthy.” During the Guided Reading portion of the lesson, students read and respond to the following question: “Reread paragraph 1 in ‘The Structure of a Corn Plant’ and paragraph 6 in ‘A Short History of a Special Plant.’ Integrate information from both texts to explain the role Native Americans played in the cultivation of corn. Cite specific evidence from the texts in your answer.” Students work independently to demonstrate their understanding of the topic by writing a response to the following prompt: “Reread paragraphs 2–3 of ‘The Future of a Crop’ and paragraphs 10–13 of ‘A Short History of a Special Plant.’ Integrate information from both texts and explain how hybrid corn has helped the United States. Cite specific evidence from the text to support your answer. 

    • In Week 3, Lesson 7, the Extended Read is a paired selection that offers two different opinions on the science of growing corn. Students closely read “The Science of Growing Corn” and partner for the Constructive Conversation section to complete this prompt: “Reread paragraphs 1–2 and 14–15. Compare and contrast the authors’ language to determine whether these texts are subjective or objective. What is each author’s purpose and how does that affect your understanding of the topic? Cite specific evidence and jot your answer in the margin.”  

  • In Unit 6, the Strategies and Skills introduction in the Teacher Resource Systems indicates that students will compare and contrast two texts with similar themes. For example:

    • In Week 3, Lesson 9, students compare two texts with similar themes. Students work with a partner to respond to the following prompt: “Both ‘The Knotted Branch’ and ‘The Law of Club and Fang’ focus on the theme of ‘survival of the fittest.’ Compare and contrast the way each text approaches this theme. Cite specific text evidence related to the way characters respond to challenges to support your thinking.” During independent work time students complete the following task: “All of the texts in this unit deal with the theme of characters versus nature. Select two or more texts from this unit and compare and contrast how each text approaches this theme. Cite specific evidence related to how characters respond to challenges to support your thinking.”

Indicator 2D
04/04

Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of a unit's topic(s) through integrated literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening).

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2d.

All units conclude with a culminating activity based on the unit’s Essential Questions that develops throughout the unit. Students learn about a topic or theme that is integrated throughout close readings and knowledge building texts; however, access to knowledge building texts cannot be ensured for all students as these readings occur during small group instruction. Most culminating tasks involve multiple literacy skills; however, the tasks follow a standard format that does not vary across the year. The format includes holding a Constructive Conversation about the central topic/essential question and completing a Write to Demonstration Knowledge task, which entails responding to each Enduring Understanding in the unit. The culminating task, conversations, and writing take place across the last two days of the unit. Students begin planning their culminating task product during a mini-lesson; however, students are typically expected to complete the task for homework or during independent time. On the last day, students hold a Constructive Conversation about the unit topic during the whole group time, and then complete the Write to Demonstrate Knowledge independently. 

Culminating tasks are evident across the year and multifaceted, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of several different standards (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at the appropriate grade level, and comprehension and knowledge of a topic or topics through integrated skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, students begin working on their culminating task product, in which they write interview questions to ask when interviewing a famous American. In Week 3, Lesson 10, the Build Towards a Culminating Task section includes the following question, “What would you want to ask Thurgood Marshall if you could interview him?” For independent work and homework, students choose who to interview and complete their questions. In Lesson 14, students finish the remaining culminating task activities, including holding a Constructive Conversation about the essential question and what they learned about their questions they wrote, as well as what they learned about how laws change. During independent time, students complete the Write to Demonstrate Knowledge portion of the task on each Enduring Understanding listed for the unit. As students write a response in their e-notebook for each understanding, the directions for the task prompt students to use the texts they have read and the research they have done for their Research and Inquiry Projects.

  • In Unit 4, Week 1, students complete the first step of their culminating task—“write a summary explaining how the perspective of one of the speakers, narrators, or characters in this unit has impacted your worldview.” Students engage in a discussion about the similarities between the texts and compare the various points of view. Materials provide a Choose a Question to Ask a Speaker or Narrator strategy for students needing more support. Students then write one question they would ask each of the speakers of that week’s reading. In Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 14, students discuss the point of view and perspective of the readings. Then students think about what question they would ask the speaker and the main character. In Week 3, Lesson 10, students discuss the point of view of the text, the feeling the author was trying to convey, and why the author chose to write about this particular time period. Then, students write two questions for the characters. Students complete the task for homework. Directions for the task include looking at the notes and Blueprint for the Unit and writing a 2–3 paragraph summary. Students must include how the chosen perspective relates to their own and what they have learned, in their summary. Students use the Blueprint, text annotations, and summary to complete the unit wrap-up. 

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, students complete the first step of their culminating task, which is to “write a public service announcement [PSA] for water conservation.” Students engage in a discussion about the impact of water in the story of Odysseus’s travels and what Michelle Pekko-Seymoure feels about the role of water in the world. Students look back through the texts and write four facts about water that they would include in their PSA. Materials provide an Identify Water Conservation Issues strategy for students needing more support. In Week 2, Lesson 14, students discuss the role of water in the excerpt from Homer’s Odyssey, what it represents, and how ancient Greeks thought about water. Students then look back through the text and identify four images that they would include in their PSA. In Week 3, Lesson 10, students discuss what they have learned, what surprised them, and why water is important. Then students choose a format for their PSA and make a plan. Students complete the task for homework. Directions for the task include creating a plan, writing a rough draft, practicing reading the PSS, and presenting their script. The PSA must include why water is important, its impact on society, and how to protect and conserve water. Students use the Blueprint, text annotations, and water conservation PSA to complete the unit wrap-up.

Indicator 2E
04/04

Materials include a cohesive, year-long plan for students to achieve grade-level writing proficiency by the end of the school year.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2e.

Materials include writing instruction aligned to grade-level standards, including explicit writing instruction and application opportunities aligned to the distribution of writing text types called for in the Standards. Writing mini-lessons occur daily for at least 15 minutes depending on the instructional time block used. Each unit focuses on writing in response to text-based prompts or process writing. The program uses a repetitive instructional process, rubrics, and protocols for all writing across grade levels. In addition to mentor texts, materials provide instructional resources for teacher use such as anchor charts, writing checklists, modeling scripts, and potential  student responses. 

Materials include writing instruction that aligns to the standards for the grade level and supports students’ growth in writing skills over the course of the school year. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a K–6 year-long writing plan in the Program Support Guide. This one-page plan provides a brief overview of each unit writing focus, the Research and Inquiry Project, and on-demand opportunities in the reading materials. The Program Support Guide also includes a Skills Scope and Sequence that indicates which writing types students will focus on each week.

  • Writing instruction follows a repetitive process. During Week 1, the teacher and students analyze a mentor writing text, and the teacher models various skills. Although short writing mini-lessons include teacher modeling and guided practice, the lessons do not embed time for students to write, peer review, revise, and publish work. Students are expected to complete these tasks during independent time. During Week 2, the teacher continues modeling skills students will need as they begin planning and drafting a writing product. During Week 3, students finalize, revise, and publish their work. While materials provide rubrics for peer and teacher evaluation, these rubrics are the same across all grades.

  • The distribution of writing modes required by the standards is as follows: 30/35/35 opinion/informative or explanatory/narrative writing. Materials reflect an approximate 28/36/36 balance. Each unit focuses on one type of writing:

    • In Unit 1, there are 15 lessons on informative/explanatory writing, leading students to use facts and evidence to plan, draft, revise, and edit informative essays on a prompt related to natural resources.

    • In Unit 2, there are 15 lessons on opinion writing, leading students to state opinions about characters and support their opinions with evidence from the text.

    • In Unit 3, there are 15 lessons on informative/explanatory writing, leading students to write an informative/explanatory essay on a topic related to the U.S. Constitution.

    • In Unit 4, there are 15 lessons on narrative writing, leading students to write their own narratives.

    • In Unit 5, there are 15 lessons on opinion writing, leading students to write an opinion essay on a technology related issue. 

    • In Unit 6, there are 15 lessons on writing to text based prompts: informative/explanatory, opinion, and narrative writing.  

    • In Unit 7, there are 15 lessons on narrative writing, leading students to write a narrative.

    • In Unit 8, there are 15 lessons on research writing, in which students choose a topic related to Earth Science, select sources, and plan, draft, revise, and edit texts, incorporating facts and details from the sources. 

    • In Unit 9, there are 15 lessons in which students conduct research, create a multimedia presentation, and present it to their peers.  

    • In Unit 10, there are 15 lessons on poetry writing. In which students study mentor poetry and draft, revise, and edit their own poems.  

Instructional materials include a variety of well-designed guidance, protocols, models, and support for teachers to implement and monitor students’ writing development. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Each unit provides daily mini-lessons for writing which include teacher modeling supports, anchor charts, writing checklists, mentor writing prompts and source texts, strategies, graphic organizers, and additional instructional materials. Materials follow a similar design, lesson template, pacing structure, and protocol list across Grades 3–6. The mini-lessons occur daily but recommend short time frames for instruction. Lesson language and expectations for writing are similar across all grades. For example: In Unit 5, the additional materials include an opinion essay writing checklist, a brainstorming chart for the opinion essay, an evaluating online sources guide, a note-taking guide, a planning guide, and a rubric.  

  • Each Unit Assessment includes a 4-Point Assessments rubric. The rubric is consistent across all the writing tasks, with only the type of writing changing. For example, the rubric for the informative/explanatory essay is listed below. The rubric for the opinion essay is exactly the same with the exception of the change in writing type from “informative/explanatory” to “opinion.”

    • “It is clearly organized and effectively incorporates details from sources.

    • It has all of the features of informative/explanatory writing. 

    • The writer follows rules of grammar and sentence structure.

    • The writer follows conventions of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.”

Indicator 2F
04/04

Materials include a progression of focused research projects to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2f.

Materials include both short embedded research tasks and longer research projects. At the end of each unit, students have the opportunity to complete a three-week Research and Inquiry Project for the first four units and a six-week project in the remaining six units. Research projects follow six steps: Choose, Explore, Interpret, Create, Present, and Reflect. Materials include explicit instruction on a progression of research skills according to grade-level standards. The research tasks and research projects are not embedded in the instructional plan for the daily lessons. Recommendations for incorporating the projects in the curriculum include using small group/independent time, homework, and other content time such as the science or social studies instructional block. Some units include shorter embedded research tasks, such as researching topics for writing and evaluating sources, that usually connect to the unit’s writing tasks. 

Research projects are sequenced across a school year to include a progression of research skills that build to mastery of the grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Recall relevant information from experiences or gather relevant information from print and digital sources; summarize or paraphrase information in notes and finished work, and provide a list of sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • Guidance for the Research and Inquiry Projects for each task includes six mini-lessons focused on the following topics: Choose, Explore, Interpret, Create, Present, and Reflect.  

      • Step 1: Choose: The focus of this mini lesson is on choosing a topic.   The teacher introduces the project, sets a purpose, guides topic choice, introduces the Research and Inquiry Project Tool, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 2: Explore: The focus of this mini lesson is on students generating questions and gathering sources. The teacher sets a purpose, guides question design and source selection, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 3: Interpret: The focus of this mini lesson is on researching and taking notes. The teacher sets a purpose, guides research and fact gathering, sends off, and wraps up.  

      • Step 4: Create: The focus of this mini lesson is on designing and constructing the research project. The teacher sets a purpose, guides design and creation, sends off, and wraps up.

      • Step 5: Present: The focus of this mini lesson is on sharing and building knowledge together. The teacher sets a purpose, guides preparing and presenting, sends off, and wraps up.

      • Step 6: Reflect: The focus of this mini lesson is on assessing and self-reflecting. The teacher sets a purpose, guides self-assessment and self-reflection, sends off, and wraps up. These six steps are repeated for each of the Research and Inquiry Projects completed with little variation, other than the topic. For example:

        • In Unit 1, the research project is to research a plant-based resource or a staple food crop such as rubber, timber, wheat, rice, soy, or potatoes and create a project to present the knowledge students have built. The project should include facts and key information about the topic, as well as visuals such as maps, drawings, timelines, or photographs that help the audience build knowledge. Students create a podcast, a video, a print or digital timeline, or an idea of their own. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources. The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search, List, and Decide strategy. First, the teacher chooses a sentence step and adds the topic.  Next, the teacher confirms this guiding question does not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful. After that, the teacher models listing the available sources and including needed information for citations. Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking two sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot, Categorize strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, rephrasing the information, and sorting the facts and details into the appropriate categories. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

        • In Unit 4, the research project is to choose a time period from one of the unit selections and research another perspective from that same period. Students choose another historical fiction story narrator and investigate how the narrator’s historical context shapes their perspective. The project can be a printed or written research report, a virtual poster, a web page, a video presentation, or another presentation of the student’s choice. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources.  The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search, and Decide strategy. First, the teacher chooses a sentence step and adds the topic. Next, the teacher confirms this guiding question does not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful. After that, the teacher models listing the available sources and including needed information for citations.  Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot, Categorize strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, and rephrasing the information. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

    • In Units 9–10, the research project is to choose a city and research how a crucial historical event or economic development changed it and create a museum exhibit to present the information. The exhibit should include images and/or audio clips. The project can be a written or typed report, a poster, a digital slideshow, a brochure, or another presentation of the student’s choice. In Mini Lesson 2, the teacher models generating questions and exploring sources. The teacher guides question design and source selection during a think aloud using the Question, Search, and Decide strategy. First, the teacher chooses a sentence step and adds the topic. Next, the teacher confirms this guiding question does not have a yes/no answer. The teacher then models searching through the sources available with the guiding questions in mind, choosing sources they think will be useful. After that, the teacher models listing the available sources and including needed information for citations. Finally, the teacher models narrowing the sources by reviewing the sources with the guiding questions in mind and picking sources they think will best help answer the guiding questions. In Mini Lesson 3, the teacher models researching and taking notes during a think aloud using the Read, Interpret, Jot, Categorize strategy. The teacher models reading a source, thinking about whether the information helps answer the guiding question, writing down the information if it fits the guiding question, and rephrasing the information. In Mini Lesson 4, the teacher models designing and constructing the research project using the Read, Design, Create strategy.  

Materials support teachers in employing projects that develop students’ knowledge of different aspects of a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Each unit contains a Knowledge Blueprint in which the students gather information related to the Enduring Understandings for the unit. While reading each text, the students add information to the Blueprint. The information added to the Blueprint builds over the course of each three-week unit, allowing students to build knowledge on the unit topic from various sources. The Blueprint also contains critical vocabulary that is used and referenced various times throughout the unit.

  • The Research and Inquiry Projects include the following teacher supports:

    • Research and Inquiry Project Tool for students to complete as they plan their project. The teacher can use the tool to focus students on the research step they are on. The tool can be interactive; the teacher can write notes or reminders to students during the project. The teacher can also use the tool to assess students at the end of the research project.

    • Strategy bank tools that explain the various strategies included in the mini lessons, such as Talk, Jot, Choose; Question, Search, Decide; Read, Interpret, Jot; Read, Design, and Create; Plan, Present, and Ask; an Question, Remember, Jot

    • Addressing the needs of multilingual learners

    • Making time for research and inquiry

    • How to group students:  Flexible grouping to promote learning

    • Using the Research and Inquiry Project Tool to support and assess students

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, the teacher conducts a mini-lesson on reviewing print sources for relevant information. Materials include a script to support the teacher with modeling how to gather information from sources. The script directs the teacher to display a note-taking chart and model gathering relevant notes: “As I scan each source, I am focusing on information related to my topic. I can focus my search by looking for cause and effect relationships to help me find relevant events in Susan B. Anthony’s life. When I take notes, I use my own words, or paraphrase. I make sure to list where I found specific information. That way I can go back for more information as I write my essay, and I can check my facts. The source list will also help me support my reasons and evidence when writing.”   

Materials provide opportunities for students to synthesize and analyze content tied to the texts under study as a part of the research process. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Students conduct short research projects that use several sources to build knowledge through investigation of different aspects of a topic. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • In Unit 3, Week 1, Lesson 3, students develop their focus for an informative/explanatory essay about voting rights in the United States. In Lesson 6, students select knowledge and credible print resources. In Lesson 9, students gather notes from their print sources. In Lesson 11, students use information from their research to begin to plan their essay.  In Week 3, Lesson 13, students complete their essay.  

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Lesson 3, students brainstorm potential topics for an opinion essay on a science and technology topic of the students choosing. In Lesson 6, students select knowledgeable and credible sources online. In Lesson 9, students research and take notes from the online sources. In Lesson 11, students use their research to begin formatting/writing their essay. In Week 3, Lesson 13, students complete their essay.  

    • In Unit 8, Week 1, students begin a research project. In Lesson 3, students focus their research. In Lesson 6, students select knowledgeable and credible print sources. The teacher displays the Source Evaluation Chart and models evaluating a source to see if it has facts about the topic, is well organized, is trustworthy, is written by an expert, and is up to date. Students work with a partner to fill out the chart with a print resource. During independent time, students complete the chart as they conduct their research. 

  • Students draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

    • In Unit 1,Week 1, Lesson 6,  students write an informative/explanatory essay in which they describe the appearance and structure of a corn using relevant facts and details from “The Structure of a Corn Plant” and the video “Harvesting Corn.” Students use the resources to find facts and details related to the topic.

    • In Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 6, students engage in a lesson on evaluating reliable sources by looking if the source is accurate and up to date. The teacher models how to evaluate sources. Students then work with a partner to evaluate an encyclopedia and another print source.

Criterion 2.2: Coherence

06/08

Materials promote mastery of grade-level standards by the end of the year.

Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Materials include 10 units over the course of the year. Each unit encompasses three weeks of lessons. Each daily lesson is designed to take roughly 60–65 minutes. Materials provide alternative options for 150-, 120-, or 90-minute literacy blocks. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time.

Indicator 2G
04/04

Materials spend the majority of instructional time on content that falls within grade-level aligned instruction, practice, and assessments.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 2g.

Materials include instruction, questions and tasks, and assessments aligned to grade-level standards. Students have opportunities to answer questions about illustrations, plot, and characters. Students practice activities such as comparing and contrasting charts, retelling details, and answering standards-aligned questions about texts. At times, students focus on comprehension strategies that may not align to standards. Although the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart illustrates when standards repeat across the year, it is unclear which learning target aligns to the instructional content and questions and tasks within each lesson.

Over the course of each unit, the majority of instruction is aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • All Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are taught in the school year according to the reformatted Correlation of Benchmark Advance to the Common Core Standards chart. Materials use general learning goals rather than CCSS, which sometimes focus on skills that are implied within the standards. It is unclear which portions of the lesson align to the learning goals listed.

    • In Unit 2, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 8, the teacher informs students that they will compare and contrast two of the characters from “Sky-Glitter” from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. The teacher models using the Speaking and Writing Response Frames to respond to the following Constructive Conversation: Partner prompt: “Compare and contrast how Genie interacts with Grandpop and how he interacts with Grandma. How are these interactions similar? How are they different/ Cite evidence that supports your answer.”  This instruction aligns to RL.5.3: “Compare and contrast two or more characters, settings, or events in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., how characters interact).”

    • In Unit 4, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 4, the teacher models how to use context clues to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words and phrases. While reading aloud the first two lines of “I Hear America Singing” by Walt Whitman, the teacher circles the word blithe and says, “I think I need to know the meaning of this word so I can comprehend the poet’s message. I’m going to read further to see if I can find any context clues to help me determine the meaning. A synonym—a word with the same meaning—is a kind of context clue.” The teacher continues reading the text aloud, modeling their thinking and use of context clues to determine the meaning of the word blithe. The teacher confirms their definition with the dictionary. Afterwards, the teacher repeats this modeling process with the words downstream and current while reading aloud the first stanza of “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou. This instruction aligns to L.5.4a and L.5.4c: “ Use context (e.g., cause/effect relationships and comparisons in text) as a clue to the meaning of a word or phrase.” and “Consult reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation and determine or clarify the precise meaning of key words and phrases.”  

    • In Unit 7, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 13, the teacher models how to understand the sequence of events in “The Banners of Freedom” from The Memoirs of Boyrereau Brinch (author not cited): “I will look for sequence words as I read. I’ll underline, ‘After we disbanded’ and ‘When I had fulfilled this contract.’ These words signal time order, but since the text is a memoir, the structure may not always follow chronological order.” This instruction does not fully align to RI.5.5: “Compare and contrast the overall structure (e.g., chronology, comparison, cause/effect, problem/solution) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts.”

Over the course of each unit, the majority of questions and tasks are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Questions and tasks are mostly aligned to the skills addressed in each of the lessons. While many of the skills support the standards, not all skills are standards-aligned. Students typically answer one or two leading questions during the lesson and two to three questions independently per core text. Questions are not labeled according to the standards and teachers would have to determine the alignment on their own.

    • In Unit 3, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 12, students respond to the following Conversation: Partner prompt: “Use your knowledge of chronological texts to answer the following question: How was the creation of the Constitution similar to the Declaration of the Rights of Women? How was it different? Cite evidence from both ‘Creating the Constitution’ [by Benjamin Godfrey] and ‘Fighting for the Vote’ [by Margaret Macon] to support your answer.” This task aligns to RI.5.5: “Compare and contrast the overall structure (e.g., chronology, comparison, cause/effect, problem/solution) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in two or more texts.”

    • In Unit 6, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 2, students independently read paragraph 3 of “Androcles and the Lion” by Aesop and make a connection to the text. This task does not align to grade-level standards.

    • In Unit 8, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 6, after the teacher models how to develop supporting text in a research project, students work with a partner to review each other’s Research Project Planning Guide. Students “write a sentence with no specific details, based on their partner’s topic.” Then, students “add facts, details, and quotations from their notes to develop this sentence.” Partner groups “discuss facts, details, and quotations that they can add.” This task aligns to W.5.2b: “Develop the topic with facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples related to the topic.” 

Over the course of each unit, the majority of assessment questions are aligned to grade-level standards. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Teacher materials include a Weekly and Unit Assessment tab that includes the print version of three assessments for each unit. Materials also provide an Answer Key and Item Rationales document that indicates the DOK level, standard alignment for each assessment question, and rationales for correct and incorrect answers. Occasionally, the standard listed does not fully align to the assessment question.  

    • In Unit 1, Week 2, Assessment, students read a short passage along with a chart and mostly answer multiple-choice questions. Examples include, but are not limited to: 

      • “Before the Civil War, why did U.S. farmers resist growing peanuts?” (DOK 1, RI.5.3) This assessment question aligns to RI.5.3: “Explain the relationships or interactions between two or more individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text based on specific information in the text.” 

      • “Which sentence states the main idea of the passage?” (DOK 2, RI.5.2) This assessment question does not fully align to RI.5.2: “Determine two or more main ideas of a text and explain how they are supported by key details; summarize the text.”  

      • “Choose three effects that happen as a result of causes stated in the passage.” (DOK 2, RI.5.3) This assessment question aligns to RI.5.3: “Explain the relationships or interactions between two or more individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text based on specific information in the text.”

    • In Unit 8, Unit Assessment, students read two short passages and answer multiple-choice, short answer, and longer response writing items including, but not limited to:

      • “What does the word relish mean as it is used in paragraph 4 of Passage 2? (DOK 2, RI.5.4)” This assessment question aligns to RI.5.4: “Determine the meaning of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases ina text relevant to a grade 5 topic or subject area.” 

      • “Based on these two passages, what can the reader conclude about rivers in the United States? Select two answers. (DOK 3, RI.5.9)” This assessment question does not fully align to RI.5.9: “Integrate information from several texts on the same topic in order to write or speak about the subject knowledgeably.”

      • “Select three sentences that belong in a summary of this passage. Write the best sentences in the chart in the correct order. (DOK 2, RL.5.2)” This assessment question does not fully align to RI.5.2: “Determine two or more main ideas of a text and explain how they are supported by key details; summarize the text.”

      • “In ‘Old Man Ends the Flood,’ how is Old Man different from the other characters in the passage? How is he similar? Write a paragraph comparing and contrasting the characters from the story. Compare and contrast Old Man with at least one other character. Use details from the passage to support your answer. (DOK 3, RL.5.3)” This assessment question aligns to RL.5.3: “Compare and contrast two or more characters, settings, or events in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., how characters interact).”

By the end of the academic year, standards are repeatedly addressed within and across units to ensure students master the full intent of the standard. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • RL.5.5 is taught in Units 2, 4, and 5 according to the correlation chart: “Explain how a series of chapters, scenes, or stanzas fits together to provide the overall structure of a particular story, drama, or poem.” 

    • In Unit 2, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 9, students read “Grandpop’s Surprise” and “Ernie’s Secret,” two chapters from As Brave As You by Jason Reynolds. Afterwards, students “analyze how each chapter contributes to the overall structure of the story and compare and contrast how both chapters approach themes in the book.” During the Constructive Conversation: Partner activity, students respond to the following prompt: “Explain how the chapters you’ve read from As Brave As You fit together to provide a structure for the story. Then compare and contrast how they approach and help develop the theme of ‘bravery.’ Cite specific evidence from each text to support your thinking.”    

    • In Unit 4, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 8, students engage in a close reading lesson to explain how multiple sections provide a structure of a story. During the Constructive Conversation, students discuss the following questions: “How is the story’s conflict represented in paragraphs 14‑24? Does the section form the rising action, climax, falling action, or resolution of the story? Cite specific evidence from the text.” During independent time, students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the prompt: “What part of the story do paragraphs 27–30 represent? Do they form the rising action, climax, resolution, or falling action of the story? How does this section build on paragraphs 14–23? Cite specific evidence from the text.” 

    • In Unit 5, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 8, students engage in a close reading lesson to examine how stanzas fit together to provide the structure of a poem. During the Constructive Conversation, students discuss their responses to the following prompt: “Reread ‘The Railroad Agent’ by James Steel Smith. How is the second stanza different from the first stanza? How does the second stanza develop the theme the poet introduces in the first stanza? Cite specific text evidence to support your thinking.” During independent time, students write 1–2 paragraphs in response to the following prompt: “Reread ‘Prayers of Steel’ by Carl Sandburg. How is the second stanza different from the first? How does the second stanza help to develop the theme that the poem introduces in the first stanza? Cite specific text evidence to support your thinking.” Although students examine how stanzas work together to develop theme, students do not explain how stanzas fit together to provide the overall structure of the poems they read.

  • RI.5.4 is taught in Units 1, 7, 9, and 10 according to the correlation chart: “Determine the meaning of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases in a text relevant to a grade 5 topic or subject area.”

    • In Unit 1, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 5, students engage in a lesson to determine the meaning of domain-specific vocabulary. The teacher uses the text “A Short History of a Special Plant” by Laura McDonald to model how to figure out the words symbiosis and integrity. During guided practice, students work with a partner to figure out the meaning of the word rotation. Students make a note of unfamiliar words they are reading and use context clues to try and figure out what the words mean. Then, students use a dictionary to confirm their definitions, which aligns to a different standard, L.5.4c: “Consult reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation and determine or clarify the precise meaning of key words and phrases.” 

    • In Unit 7, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 5, students engage in a lesson to determine the meaning of domain-specific vocabulary using context clues, specifically comparisons. The teacher poses the question, “How were the Native American nations that resented the colonists different from other Native American nations?” The teacher directs students to circle the words resented, warfare, militiamen, civil war, and surrender. Students then reread the text Native Americans in the Revolution by Abigail Conklin and “use comparisons to determine the meaning of the words.”  

    • In Unit 10, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 5, students engage in a lesson on using context clues to determine the meaning of words. While reading the text Changes in Matter by Laura McDonald,  students use a chart to write the word, their definition, and then the dictionary definition for the words substance, physical change, chemical change, reactants, and evaporation. While using context clues to determine the meaning of domain-specific vocabulary aligns to RI.5.4, using the dictionary to determine or clarify the meaning of words aligns to a different standard, L.5.4c: “Consult reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation and determine or clarify the precise meaning of key words and phrases.”

Indicator 2H
02/04

Materials regularly and systematically balance time and resources required for following the suggested implementation, as well as information for alternative implementations that maintain alignment and intent of the standards.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 2h.

Materials include 10 units over the course of the year. Each unit encompasses three weeks of lessons. Each daily lesson is designed to take roughly 60–65 minutes. Materials provide alternative options for 150-, 120-, or 90-minute literacy blocks. The scope and sequence provides a year-long plan with structured core instruction. Each activity within the lesson includes a time frame to complete all of the components; however, there is not sufficient time to complete the tasks in the allotted time. Additionally, many tasks are pushed into independent or small group time and according to their time frame, those two time periods include many tasks from the core lesson. Materials also provide optional activities, such as Research and Inquiry Projects, a Novel Study in each unit, and Media Literacy lessons, but there is limited guidance on how to schedule these into instruction. Additionally, the time needed for implementation may not be feasible within a 90- or 120-minute block. Although materials recommend assessments for each unit, materials do not dedicate time for their administration. The Comprehensive Literacy Planner for each week indicates that assessments can be given “at the end of the week,” but there is not a specific time frame built in for their administration. 

Suggested implementation schedules and alternative implementation schedules align to core learning and objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials contain a Comprehensive Literacy Planner for each week within a unit. The Comprehensive Literacy Planner lays out the Read-Aloud, Phonics and Word Study Lessons, Comprehension Lessons, Writing & Language Lessons, Small-Group Reading Ideas, Independent Reading & Conferring Ideas, Independent Writing & Conferring Ideas, and Assessment recommendations. Although the planner gives a suggested time frame for lessons, the planner does not include time frames for small group and independent work.

  • The Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes the following guidance for Small-Group Reading: “Meet with small groups of students to: scaffold reading behaviors and strategies using small-group texts, teacher’s guides, and prompting cards, build fluency using the reader’s theater scripts and Readers Theater Handbook lessons, Revisit complex texts in Texts for Close Reading, See additional small-group suggestions on the Unit Foldout.” Under Independent Reading & Conferring the Planner provides this guidance: “During independent time: Ensure that all students read independently to build volume and stamina, Confer with a few students on their text selections, application of strategies, and knowledge building tasks, see additional independent suggestions (including the Research and Inquiry Project) on the Unit Foldout.”

Suggested implementation schedules cannot be reasonably completed in the time allotted. Examples include, but are not limited, the following:

  • Materials provide pacing options for 150-, 120-, and 90-minute literacy blocks. Each option includes suggested time frames for the Read Aloud, Reading and Word Study, and Writing and Grammar lesson components.

    • 150-Minute Literacy Block

      • Read-Aloud: 15 minutes

      • Reading and Word Study: 75 minutes

      • Writing and Grammar: 60 minutes

    • 120-Minute Literacy Block

      • Read-Aloud: 10 minutes

      • Word Study: 60 minutes

      • Writing and Grammar: 50 minutes

    • 90-Minute Literacy Block

      • Reading & Word Study: 50 minutes

      • Writing & Grammar: 40 minutes

  • Within those three pacing options the time allotted for Reading and Word Study is 75 minutes, 60 minutes, and 50 minutes, respectively. Reading and Word Study includes the Comprehension and Word Study Mini-lessons and Independent and Small Group time. Three days a week, the Reading and Wordy Study portion of the day includes 45 minutes of planned lessons. According to the pacing options given for the above literacy blocks that would leave 35, 15, and 5 minutes of Independent/Small Group time, respectively. Students also receive tasks to complete during independent time or for homework. 

  • The implementation schedule for each Unit provides a time frame of 60-65 minutes for each part of the daily lesson.

    • Read Aloud: 10 minutes

    • Reading and Vocabulary Mini-lessons: 15 minutes per lesson

    • Small-Group Lesson:10–15 minutes per group

    • Writing and Language Mini-lessons: 15 minutes

    • Word Study Mini-lessons: 15 minutes 

    • Assessments are listed, but materials do not include a suggested time frame for their administration.

  • In Unit 1, Week 1, Mini-lesson 12, the suggested time to complete this part of the lesson is 15 minutes. The teacher spends one minute engaging students’ thinking. Then, the teacher spends five minutes reading a section of the text and identifying dialect and register, including how that affects the text. Students spend five minutes working with a partner to reread paragraphs 7–9 and find examples of dialect. Students annotate these paragraphs and write down the register that the character might use. Then, students find places where the dialect isn’t used and compare that to the sections it was used. Then, students come back together as a group and share and reflect for 3–4 minutes. During the last minute of the lesson, the teacher goes over the section that students will complete independently. 

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, Day 4, the Comprehensive Literacy Planner includes teaching Mini-lesson 10 and 12 and Phonics and Word Study Lesson 2. These three lessons require a total of 45 minutes. Students also receive five tasks to complete during independent time. 

Optional tasks may distract from core learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In the Research & Inquiry Projects Teacher Guide, the Making Time for Research & Inquiry section provides suggestions for incorporating Research & Inquiry into the school day. One option suggests building Research & Inquiry into the small-group time. Materials list a possible schedule for this option, and all of the options take 15 minutes out of small group time. A second option entails completing the bulk of the work at home, once daily instruction concludes. The third option recommends pushing the project into science or social studies instructional time, with the selected content area dependent upon the best correlation for the project. 

  • Materials include cursive writing practice pages, but the practice pages do not appear to have specific lessons associated with them.

  • Materials contain a Media Literacy Handbook. This resource contains lessons introducing students to types of media, messages, and uses. Guidance notes, “This handbook acts as a lesson bank that can be used in any order, depending on need and interest.”

  • Materials include a novel for conducting a Novel Study. Resources to support this instruction can be found in the Novel Study tab of the digital platform. The digital version of the novel contains a Teacher Resources icon at the top of the page. Clicking here launches the Novel Guide, which contains three sections: Guide at a Glance, Novel Plot Summary, and Student Guide. This guide provides the Lexile level of the novel, three reading options—independent, partner, peer group—and pacing suggestions. The Student Guide section includes various supports, such as planners, writing prompts, and charts, for student use before, during, and after reading. 

  • Materials provide resources to conduct Book Clubs. The schedule section of Small Group and Independent Resources describes cycling between a common novel for a few weeks, Book Clubs for about three weeks, and individual books for a few weeks. Materials provide ideas for mini-lessons, selecting books, and running the Book Clubs; however, materials do not provide lessons for conducting Book Clubs.

Optional tasks are meaningful and enhance core instruction. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials include Intervention Teaching Guides for Comprehension and Language. The Introduction for teachers states, “Benchmark Advance Intervention is intended for students who need extra support to master grade-level skills. It offers reteaching and additional practice to reinforce instruction in the core program.” The intervention lessons parallel the instruction in the core program and are designed to last 15 minutes.

  • Materials contain a Grammar, Spelling & Vocabulary Activity book. The resource links to each week’s grammar and spelling/vocabulary focus and includes four practice pages for each week. The pages provide practice for the targeted goals, as well as a review of previously taught skills. The introduction states, “The activities are designed for flexible use in the classroom.”

  • Research and Inquiry Projects connect to the unit topics and themes and support the building knowledge requirements in each unit.  For example, the Unit 3 topic is “The U.S. Constitution: Then and Now,” and students “[s]elect a law and explore how that law has continued to evolve,” during the Research & Inquiry Project. 

  • Research and Inquiry Projects connect to skills and standards in the unit. For example, in Unit 1, students focus on identifying key details, using visuals, and integrating information. During the Research & Inquiry project, students create a product about a plant-based resource. 

  • Optional materials connect with the unit topic or theme and essential question. For example, the Unit 6 topic and essential questions are about survival in the wild. The small group texts include, but are not limited to, “Surviving Alaska” by Paul Graci, a book about surviving in Alaska. The program lists trade books that support the topic and essential questions including, but not limited to, “Nelson Mandela” by Kadir Nelson. This story highlights Nelson Mandela’s struggle in Apartied South Africa. 

  • Optional materials connect with the unit’s overall standards focus. For example, the Unit 6 focus standards examine determining theme and comparing two texts, and the small group text “Pure Vida” by Judith Bauer Stamper focuses on analyzing story elements. 

  • Materials include optional Read-Aloud Extending Activities; however, these activities are generic and are the same for every unit. For example, some activities include “Character Reflection,” during which students write words or phrases that they are thinking about the character. After sharing their thoughts with a partner, students create a list poem with the words and phrases. 

  • Although the lessons are primarily for building fluency, the optional Reader’s Theater materials connect to each unit’s topic or theme and essential question. For example, the Unit 8 topic is about water and water’s role in societies. During the text “Wild Weather” by Joanna Korba, students answer questions about the water and its impact on people, such as “Tell what will happen when the sand dunes in the Ténéré soak up rain?“

Overview of Gateway 3

Usability

Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course.

Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Performance Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. The Program Guide includes a Supports for Exceptional Learners document which provides detailed guidance for teachers when supporting the diverse learning needs of English learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that contains the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Students have some opportunities to read and view materials and assessments that depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA.Materials integrate technology, including interactive tools, such as eBooks and interactive learning games, in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards.The visual design of the materials is not distracting and supports student learning and engagement, and the layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels.

Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports

09/09

The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.

Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition. Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. Materials include a Home/School Connections letter for each unit which can be found in the Home-School section of the digital platform. The letter is available in six languages and explains the knowledge building concept and includes activities for families to do, but it does not include information about the ELA skills and strategies students will work on in the unit. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment. Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson.

Indicator 3A
02/02

Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a. 

Materials provide guidance for teachers embedded within the lessons and ancillary material. Materials provide support including what to do, what materials to use, models of scripts, completed charts, and a list of the additional materials provided. In the lesson, there are clear directions that lay out each step of the lesson and scripting in blue font for teachers. Learning goals are provided for the week and each lesson. 

Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials provide teachers with overviews and highlight instructional supports and instructional routines. Each unit has an overview section that provides teachers with a broad view of the program and resources provided in the curriculum including, but not limited to, the content knowledge alignment, pacing options, and sample literacy blocks, and digital and print components.

  • Within each unit is a section for unit resources that include overviews such as strategies and skills, intervention and reteaching resources, vocabulary development, and suggested language objectives. For example, the components at a glance provide a visual organization for the materials for that unit broken down by week. This includes the materials for the read-aloud, reading and vocabulary mini-lessons, small-group reading, writing, and language lessons. The right-hand side includes an additional list of the resources found in the Digital Learning Portal.  

  • After the introductory section, materials are then broken down by each week, and each week has a Learning Goal tab that provides teachers with an overview of the learning for that week that includes skills and strategies to build knowledge, spelling words, and vocabulary. There is also a Comprehensive Literacy Planner that breaks down each day with a broad overview that is the same for the whole week. For example, in Unit 1, Week 1, Day 1, in the section for small-group reading it lists 

“Meet with small groups of students to: 

  • Scaffold reading behaviors and strategies using small-group texts, teacher’s guides, and prompting cards.

  • Build fluency using the reader’s theater scripts and Readers Theater Handbook lessons.

  • Revisit complex texts in Texts for Close Reading.

  • See additional small-group suggestions on the Unit Foldout.”

  • In each lesson, materials provide teachers with a guide for that lesson. The guide includes a screenshot and link to the student materials, the learning targets, a breakdown of the lesson components with a teacher script that includes time requirements, what to do and say, as well as questions and prompts for that lesson. For example, in Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 7, Teachers are given the directions to spend 1 minute Engaging Thinking “Set the purpose for today's lesson.” Then in blue font, materials include a model script for teacher use: “Today, we will analyze the author’s use of run‑ons and fragments in ‘I Speak Spanish, Too.’”

Materials include sufficient, useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Materials provide scripts when modeling and moving through the lesson. For example, in Unit 3, Week 2, Lesson 4, the lesson focuses on determining central ideas and the supporting details. Materials provide the following teacher script in blue: “We have explored finding central ideas and key details that support them. Some informational texts have more than one central idea. Finding these central ideas helps the reader focus on the important ideas in the text. Today I'll show you how I find the key details in a text to determine a central idea. Then I'll ask you to do the same.” Then lesson guidance directs the teacher to complete a read-aloud and model identifying key details and how they help determine the central idea: “The title explains the central idea of this selection: the fight for the right to vote. There can be several central ideas that connect to this central idea. I'll look for key details in the first paragraph. I'll underline ‘colonists could not vote for their representatives’ and ‘they set out to establish a new government.’ These key details lead me to the central idea of this paragraph: The colonists wanted a new government so that they could have representation. I'll write that in the margin.” Materials provide guidance for teachers as they observe students working with a partner during guided reading time: “Ask students to reread paragraphs 3–8 and underline key details. Then ask them to jot the central ideas in the margin.”

  • Materials provide an Instructional Routine and Strategy guide for each unit. For example, in the Fluency Routine, the guide states, “...fluent readers convey meaning by stressing important words and letting their voices rise and fall.” Then, teachers read a short section with a flat tone and reread it with prosody. Next, the teacher says, “Turn and talk to a partner. How did your understanding of the characters change during my second reading?” Then students practice fluent reading during choral reading. This strategy repeats across all 10 units and does not vary based on the genre of the text students read. 

  • The Building Knowledge Topic Library contains a teacher's guide that includes, but is not limited to, an overview with a Lexile and summary, a Building Reading Behaviors section which includes strategies and supports, and a Deepening Understanding section. Each section includes teacher scripts, questions, sample questions, and a rationale. For example, the teacher’s guide for the text  “K9 To Serve and Protect” includes the following sample model: “To draw an inference, I combine my prior knowledge with new information to learn more. During my preview of the book, I drew several inferences. For example, the title of Chapter 1 is ‘The Rookie.’ I know that a rookie is someone who is new to a job. So I inferred that someone in the story will be new at a job.” 

Indicator 3B
02/02

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.

Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition.

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes a number of supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts:

    • “Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations” by Jeff Zwiers, Ed.D., an informational resource that explains the two common types of conversations that take place in the classroom and the instructional supports the materials provide to support students with those conversations

    • Speaking and Writing Response Protocols by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., which explains speaking or writing frame scaffolds that teachers may use as part of a gradual release model to support students with discussions and writing tasks throughout the year 

    • Instructional Spotlights, which includes training videos on Building and Assessing Fluency, Managing an Independent Reading Program, and Instructional Tips for differentiation and small groups, foundational skills, social-emotional learning, whole group instruction, and writing 

Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Program Support Guide includes skills development content to support teachers with improving their foundational skills knowledge:

    • “Phonics and the Way to Meaning” from Phonics in Motion by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., a chapter excerpt that explains what brain research tells us, what the research means, explicit and systematic teaching, and an overview of key phonics research

    • The Essential Role of Metacognition in the Science of Reading by Peter Afflerbach, PhD, an article which defines metacognition and its connection to reading science research

  • The Teachers’ Professional Learning Library section of the PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes content to support teachers with improving their understanding of interactive writing, phonics and word study, reading assessments, and reading fluency. 

Indicator 3C
02/02

Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.

Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. The Program Scope and Sequence also utilizes language from the CCSS in the Weekly Skills and Strategies section for each unit across the year. The revised Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document explicitly lists the CCSS and the unit in which the standard is taught. This document also indicates primary and secondary citations for each standard, as well as where the standard is addressed in the program’s ancillary materials. The Skills Development section of the Program Support Guide includes an additional scope and sequence document. This document uses language from the CCSS, categorizes the skills and strategies addressed in the program at the unit- and week-level, and indicates when skills and strategies are first introduced and subsequently revisited.    

Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Program Support Guide includes a Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document. This document outlines the standards in reading, writing, speaking and listening, fluency, and vocabulary, the teacher resource citations, and where that standard is addressed. 

  • The Program Scope and Sequence includes a visual document that outlines the essential question, unit readings, weekly readings, and weekly skills and strategies across the year. The Weekly Skills and Strategies section uses language from the standards to describe the comprehension and vocabulary strategies and the grammar skills addressed. For example, in Unit 3, Week 1, the vocabulary strategy listed is “Use Context Clues to Determine the Meaning of Words and Phrases,” which aligns to L.5.4a.  

  • In the Unit Resources section of each Teacher’s Resource System, materials provide a Suggested Language Objective document that lists the connection to state content standards and WIDA language development standards. The document states the objective of what students should know and be able to do using student-friendly language.

Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit Resources section of the Teacher’s Resource System contains a Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge document that outlines which Metacognitive Strategies, Fix-Up Strategies, and Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills students are working on, as well as the week in which the strategies and skills are taught. The document also outlines whether the skill is introduced, revisited, or assessed on the unit assessment. 

  • Each unit contains a Learning Goals document that outlines the standards-based skills that students are working on in that unit for foundational skills, metacognitive skills, comprehension, vocabulary, writing, grammar, and speaking and listening. For example, in Unit 7, Week 1, one of the Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills listed is “Compare and Contrast the Overall Structure of Events in Two or More Texts (Chronology),” which aligns to RI.5.5. 

Indicator 3D
Read

Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.

Materials include a Home/School Connections letter for each unit which can be found in the Home-School section of the digital platform. The letter is available in six languages. The letter explains the knowledge building concept and includes activities for families to do, but it does not include information about the ELA skills and strategies students will work on in the unit. Activities include a Topic Connection, a Vocabulary Connection, a Comprehension Connection, and a Word Study Connection. Materials also include a Parent/Caregiver letter that can be found in the Managing Your Independent Reading Program Reproducible Resources. Guidance indicates that this letter be sent home at the beginning of the school year, as the letter informs parents about reading their child should be doing at home. The letter lists several ways to share the books with their child and it also includes suggestions for talking about the book, reading the book, and writing about the book. The Parent/Caregiver letter is also available in Spanish.

Materials contain strategies for informing students, parents, or caregivers about the ELA program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Unit 1 Home/School Connections letter states, “This year, our fifth grade students will build literacy and language skills by participating in ten cross-disciplinary units of study in our Benchmark Advance Program…. In this unit, your child will read and compare selections about plants, their function, and how humans cultivate food crops and develop these natural resources.” 

Materials contain suggestions for how parents or caregivers can help support student progress and achievement. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials provide a Supporting Your Student Remotely Module. This resource includes “videos that guide parents on creating a learning environment.”

  • The Unit 9 Home/School Connections letter includes four suggested activities to do at home, one of which is the Vocabulary Connection: “Visual Dictionary—Ask your child to make a visual dictionary to help him or her have easy access to the definitions of the following words: decline, entrepreneurs, estimated, ethnic, incentives, incorporated, obstacles, opportunities, prosperity, and revitalize.”

  • The Parent/Caregiver Letter found in the Managing Your Independent Reading Program states, “You can help your child practice reading. Here are several ways to share the books with your child.” Some ways listed include, but are not limited to, “ask your child about the title and author, talk about the pictures on each page, listen as the child reads the book to you, have your child predict what might happen next and explain why, and ask your child to write or draw something about the book.”

Indicator 3E
02/02

Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e. 

The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Many of the provided components include videos and demos to support teachers with understanding the instructional approaches. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment.

Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Advance digital platform includes a Reviewer’s Multimedia Guide to Benchmark Advance. This resource includes videos explaining the program’s instructional approaches to reading, vocabulary, writing, speaking and listening, and assessment in Grades K–2 and Grades 3–6.  

  • The PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab in the Benchmark Universe platform includes several components to support teachers with understanding the various instructional approaches of the program:

    • The Program Overview includes short videos that explain the instructional framework of the unit topic text sets, foundational skills, reading and writing, responsive teaching, and the program’s spiral design of instruction. 

    • The Grades 3–6 Program Review includes explanations and demo videos of the instructional design routines; read alouds; whole group, phonics and word study, reading, and writing mini-lessons; small group instruction; independent work time; and assessment.  

    • The Instructional Concepts module includes explanations of the program’s approach to vocabulary development in Grades 2–6.  

  • The Additional Resources tab in each unit includes an Instructional Routines and Strategies document. This document explains the instructional routines for read alouds, vocabulary, spelling, and fluency. 

Materials include and reference research-based strategies.

  • The PD Training: Curriculum Resources include a Research Foundations module. This module explains the research that supports the program’s approach to word recognition and decoding; language comprehension which includes background knowledge and vocabulary; reading comprehension; writing, including handwriting, spelling, and composition; and assessment.

Indicator 3F
01/01

Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.

Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson. If the teacher needs examples of articles, texts, or resources, those items are not called out in the provided materials list; those materials are listed in the lesson details and the modeling script provided for teacher use. The Additional Materials bank for each unit details the items needed for each lesson, including but not limited to, the mentor text, writing prompts, vocabulary charts, note-taking guides, glossaries, and close reading questions. Materials also provide a bank of generic graphic organizers such as T-charts, concept maps, and Frayer Model. The Additional Materials section of the digital platform contains a digital folder that includes all of the supporting materials for each unit.  

Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 1, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:

    • Unit 2 video

    • Multilingual Glossary

  • In Unit 5, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 6, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:

    • Modeling Text

    • Opinion Essay Anchor Chart

    • Modeling Supporting Evidence Text

    • Student Opinion Essay Planning Guide (from Mini‑Lesson 3)

    • Opinion Essay Writing Checklist (from Mini‑Lesson 3)

  • In Unit 8, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 4, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:

    • Practice Task

    • Figurative Language Anchor Chart

    • Response Notebooks or e‑Notebooks

Indicator 3G
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3H
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.2: Assessment

10/10

The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.

Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level. Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning and include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. Materials provide Weekly and Unit assessments in print and e-assessment format. While the e-assessments include digital tools that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessments, the print versions do not include assessment accommodations.

Indicator 3I
02/02

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.

Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level. 

Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments and include all standards and practices for the grade or course level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Interim Assessment is administered four times a year. Interim Assessment 1 is administered twice, once as a pre-test and once as a post-test. Interim Assessment 2 assesses standards taught in Units 1–3. Interim Assessment 3 assesses standards taught in Units 1–6. The Interim Assessment includes an answer key that lists the ELA standards assessed for each item. 

  • The Performance Task Assessments may be administered after Units 2, 5, and 8. The performance tasks are based on standards taught in previous lessons and include a writing task. The answer key includes standards for each item. 

  • The rubrics provided to assess the Performance Task Assessment writing tasks identify the overarching Writing standard and identify the assessed Writing and Language sub-standards. The Evidence of Genre Characteristics and Grammar and Conventions columns of the provided rubric contain varied lists of elements for each scoring range. These lists use language from the Writing and Language sub-standards and the answer key identifies the standards assessed. 

  • Weekly Assessments are administered at the end of each of the three weeks within each unit. The assessments include an item rationale with the standards assessed for each question. 

Indicator 3J
04/04

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.

Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning. Materials include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The Interim, Performance Task, Weekly, and Unit Assessments include item rationales for incorrect and correct answers. Materials provide teacher guidance for reteaching and reassessing strategies and skills.

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Universe materials provide multiple methods for assessment including forms and checklist for informal assessments, Interim Assessments, Quick Checks, Weekly and Unit Assessments, and Performance Tasks. 

  • Each unit includes two weekly assessments and one cumulative unit assessment.  Each of these assessments contains an answer key and item rationale that indicates the standard being assessed for each assessment item, as well as explanations of correct and incorrect responses.

  • Each unit includes a Build Knowledge Evaluation Tool, a rubric designed to help teachers “evaluate students’ demonstration of knowledge gained during the unit.”  This assessment tool follows a four-point scale that rates students on their knowledge blueprint, their culminating task, and how they demonstrated knowledge through writing.  Each unit also includes an exemplar of student work that meets expectations for demonstration of knowledge gained.

  • The Language and Comprehension Quick Checks assess students on language and reading skills. Materials include two forms of each assessment, and the assessments may be administered more than once during the year. Guidance notes that the Quick Checks “are intended as formative assessments to help you monitor students’ progress and adapt instruction to individuals’ needs.” 

Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Overview section of the Informal Assessments guide outlines the program’s Assessment, Teaching, and Learning cycle: “Meaningful, ongoing, and multifaceted observation is the heart of the evaluation process. Since observations must occur in authentic contexts, utilize your whole-class and small-group reading time to document students’ efforts to: join collaborative conversations; ask and answer questions; react to prompts; contribute ideas for graphic organizers; process texts; problem-solve new words; apply targeted skills and strategies; act out and/or talk, draw, or write about books. Use the information you gain to differentiate instruction by developmental reading behaviors and characteristics, metacognitive and comprehension strategy needs, instructional reading levels, fluency, and vocabulary understandings.”

  • The Overview section of each Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide includes guidance on how to use the results from each type of assessment. Materials note that the main purpose of the Interim Assessments is “to monitor progress.” Guidance directs teachers to “look for steady progress from the beginning of the year to the end” when evaluating students’ scores. Next steps for Interim Assessments includes general suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed.” and “Reviewing a student’s assessment with the student may also be helpful. It can provide an opportunity for students to see which questions they answered incorrectly and why their answers were incorrect.” Next steps for Performance Task assessments is as follows: “After scoring a Performance Task, review each student’s results to see how well he or she performed on each part: the selected-response questions and the writing prompt. Some students will perform well on the first part but not the second, and this information can be valuable in planning further instruction. When reviewing students’ responses, you may want to refer to the state standards indicated in the Answer Keys to identify areas that require additional instruction.”

  • The Weekly and Unit Assessments include a section that describes ways to use the assessment results. Guidance includes suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed. For example, a student may answer questions about Key Details and Main Idea correctly but have trouble with questions that require Making Inferences or Comparing and Contrasting. Instruction for this student in the next week or following unit may require more focus on these two strategies.” 

  • The Introduction section of the Language Quick Checks and the Comprehension Quick Checks include guidance on using the scores to provide students support. If students score between 80%–100%, the teacher should “[m]ove on to the next Quick Check or skill.” If students score between 66%–80%, guidance is as follows: “Consider administering the Quick Check again. Continue monitoring the student during future Quick Checks.” If students score below 66%, the teacher should “[u]se additional resources shown in the Resource Map to provide the student with opportunities to remediate skills.” The skills assessed in the Language Quick Checks Resource Map align to the Writing and Language Handbook, and the skills assessed in the Comprehension Quick Checks align to the Benchmark Advance Intervention Reading lessons. 

  • Each unit includes a Small Group Texts for Reteaching Strategies and Skills document. This document lists small group texts that are aligned to the metacognitive strategies and comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency skills for each unit’s scope and sequence. The teacher may use these texts to reteach skills and strategies during small group instruction. 

  • Each unit includes an Intervention and Reteaching Resources document. This document lists specific strategies and skills taught in the unit and guides the teacher to specific resources for reteaching, practice, and assessment of those skills.

Indicator 3K
04/04

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.

Materials include assessments that measure the standards. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards.  

Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The materials provide a K-6 Informal Assessments resource. This assessment resource includes developmental checklists, independent reading observation checklists, records and checklists to use in small group instruction, retelling assessments and rubrics, and writing rubrics and checklists.

  • Each unit includes three assessments: a Week 1 Assessment, a Week 2 Assessment, and a Unit Assessment. The Weekly Assessments mostly include multiple choice and evidence-based selected response item types. The Unit assessments include the same item types, as well as one compare and contrast constructed response question. 

  • Materials include Interim Assessments and Performance Task assessments. The Overview section of the Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide notes, “All of the reading questions in the Interim Assessments are selected-response items. The Grades K–1 assessments only use multiple-choice items with three answer choices. In Grades 2–6, all of the questions in the Interim Assessments and Performance Tasks consist of several different selected-response item types….Both the Interim Assessments and the Performance Tasks include an extended-response writing prompt.” Grades 2–6 Interim Assessment item types include multiple choice, multiple response, evidence-based selected response, hot text, matching, and drag and drop. The item types for Grades 2–6 Performance Tasks are as follows: “The assessment component for each grade offers three Performance Tasks: one narrative task, one informative/explanatory task, and one opinion/argumentative task. Each task has two parts. Part 1 presents two or three sources (reading passages or videos) for students to read or view and a set of three to four selected-response questions. Part 2 provides an extended-response writing prompt.” 

Indicator 3L
Read

Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.

The digital versions of the Unit Assessments, Performance Tasks, and Interim Assessments provide some universal accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. These universal accommodations include a line reader, magnifier for diagrams and illustrations, increasing or decreasing text size, and ability to change the screen color. The Custom Features Tab includes an e-Assessment category which provides screenshots and explanations of the tools provided on the digital assessment platform. Digital materials also provide an introduction video for student use on how to navigate the test and how to access the assessment tools. 

Materials offer some accommodations that ensure all students can access the assessment (e.g., text to speech, increased font size) without changing the content of the assessment. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Students can increase font size in the e-assessments. Materials provide an introductory video for students that shows them how to access this accommodation.

  • Students can select a magnifier from the toolbar on the e-assessments. In the settings tab, students can also adjust the contrast of the screen by changing the background from white to a selected color. 

  • Select assessments that are audio-enabled provide audio support. 

Materials include some guidance for teachers on the use of provided accommodations. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Additional Resources section of each unit includes an Access and Equity document that provides teachers with information about teaching Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners; however, this document primarily provides instructional routines and strategies rather than assessment accommodations.  

  • There was no evidence of teacher guidance on the use of the provided assessment accommodations found in the materials.

Criterion 3.3: Student Supports

05/06

The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.

Materials provide specific strategies and support for students with special needs within the whole group lessons and indicate these tips using a key icon in the lesson section where support may be provided. Materials provide limited extension opportunities for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level to engage with literacy content and concepts at a greater depth. Materials contain some multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem solve using a variety of formats and methods. Although materials indicate which tasks pair or partner groups, materials do not provide guidance on how and when to use specific grouping strategies. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that identifies the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Materials, including texts and assessments, depict characters and individuals of varying ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. Materials typically present these diversities in a positive light. Materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA. Materials also provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document; however, the use of this resource is optional.

Indicator 3M
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.

Materials provide specific strategies and support for students with special needs within the whole group lessons. Materials indicate these tips using a key icon in the lesson section where support may be provided. Materials also include various support documents, such as the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document and the Access and Equity document, that provide generalized strategies applicable to any lesson. These generalized supports are the same across Grades 3–6. 

Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document includes features of the program that support English Learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. Program supports for students with special needs include, but are not limited to, Unit Intervention/Reteaching Resources and Access Features. This support document is the same for K–6.

  • In the Additional Resources tab of each unit, the Access and Equity document provides general guidance on planning and delivering instruction for students with disabilities including:

    • Get to know your students with disabilities as individuals.

    • Utilize the Individual Education Program (IEP) or 504 Plan.

    • Build collaboration between the general education and special education teachers.

    • See Accommodating Students with Special Needs Throughout the Literacy Block to learn more about how to differentiate instruction using the specially designed features in Benchmark Advance

  • The Accommodating Students with Special Needs Throughout the Literacy Block document provides general suggestions to support students with special needs during the literacy block. Suggestions include, but are not limited to:

    • Provide visual cues such as photos, illustrations, gestures, and facial expressions.

    • Provide sentence frames.

    • Allow students to write or draw to express their ideas during discussions.

    • Based on your observations, adjust the content and pace of instruction.

    • Allow partner or buddy reading and discussion while creating annotated notes.

  • The Apply Understanding section of most lessons includes specific strategies for working with students with special needs. Materials indicate these supports using a key icon with the word Access written on the key. 

    • In Unit 1, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 4, the Access tip states, “Have students dictate the central idea to a partner, or draw a picture representing the central idea. As an alternative, have students complete Explain How Key Details Support the Central Ideas of a Text A or B in Grade 5 Comprehension Quick Checks. As needed, ask a volunteer to read aloud the passages and record the student's answers to the questions.” 

    • In Unit 5, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 7, the Access tip states, “Allow students to read the texts with a partner. As they read, encourage them to annotate the text and note any inferences they make about the worker in the poem. When they are finished, have partners share their inferences and discuss how they used text details to make these inferences.” 

    • In Unit 9, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 3, the Access tip states, “Have students work with a partner to complete the activity above. The partner may need to read the paragraphs aloud, pausing to discuss key details. If students have not already, they may complete Determine Two or More Main Ideas in a Text Quick Check A or B in Grade 5 Comprehension Quick Checks.”

Indicator 3N
01/02

Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.

Materials provide limited extension opportunities for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level to engage with literacy content and concepts at a greater depth. Most opportunities occur during small group or independent reading activities and do not appear to be specific extension opportunities for above-level learners. Some instructional lessons include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions. Materials include various support documents, such as the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document and the Access and Equity document, that provide generalized strategies applicable to any lesson. These generalized supports are the same across Grades 3–6. Materials include some instances of additional work for above-level learners, such as extended writing requirements for the Research and Inquiry Projects.

Materials provide limited opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include some instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document includes features of the program that support English Learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. Program supports for high-ability learners include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions, Novel Study Units , Knowledge Building Topic Libraries for Independent Reading, Text Evidence Question Cards for Titles in Knowledge Building Topic Libraries, and Read-Aloud Extension Activities. These options appear to be available to all students. Materials do not provide a distinction between alternatives for above-level learners and all learners.

  • Week 2 and Week 3 Close Reading lessons include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions. These suggestions include reinforcing or extension prompts that the teacher may offer based on how students respond to the lesson tasks. For example, in Unit 4, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 10, the suggestion states if “students independently infer how the story would be different…” then “extend a challenge task, time permitting: Have students rewrite paragraph 5 from Peter's point of view.” It is unclear if the suggestions are for above-level learners or for students who have mastered the lesson task or skill. 

  • In the Additional Resources tab of each unit, the Access and Equity document provides general guidance on planning and delivering instruction for students who are advanced learners. The document includes suggestions for recognizing advanced learners and tips for differentiating instruction. The bulleted suggestions are repeated recommendations using the same materials listed in the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document.

  • In Unit 2, Step 1 for the Research and Inquiry Project, Research Tales from Other Countries, includes an Extend option for exceptional learners. The option recommends students use three tales instead of two to complete the project: “You may wish to share several examples of author comparisons for advanced learners who want to create something larger, broader, and more complex than the project requirements. Students may even choose to compare more than two authors.” 

Indicator 3O
Read

Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.

Materials contain some multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem solve using a variety of formats and methods. Materials leverage the use of various formats, including discussions and presentations. Students share their thinking with the class, and write in response to their reading and conversations. While materials provide opportunities for students to reflect, self-assess their work, and receive feedback, students do not have opportunities to monitor and move their own learning.  

Materials provide some multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem-solve using a variety of formats and methods. Materials leverage the use of a variety of formats and methods over time to deepen student understanding and ability to explain and apply literacy ideas. Students have opportunities to share their thinking and apply their understanding in new contexts but do not have opportunities to demonstrate changes in their thinking over time. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit or unit pair includes a Research & Inquiry Project that is designed to deepen students’ knowledge of the unit topic. During the Step 1: Choose mini-lesson, students use the Talk, Jot, Choose strategy to select a research focus. During the Step 2: Explore mini-lesson, students use the Question, Search, Decide strategy to find trustworthy and reliable sources. During the Step 3: Interpret mini-lesson, students use the Read, Interpret, Jot strategy to “research and gather facts and key information about their topic.” During the Step 4: Create mini-lesson, students use the Read, Design, Create strategy to make their final product. During the Step 5: Present mini-lesson, students use the Plan, Present, Ask strategy to share their final product with their peers. Project guidance directs the teacher to choose the presentation option that works best in their classroom setting. Presentation options include whole group, small group, partnerships, filming the presentation and sharing it on a digital platform, visiting another classroom to share their presentation or inviting guests to join the classroom virtually or in person, and mailing or emailing the presentation to a local business, organization, or community center who may find displaying the project useful.    

  • At the end of each week, students build knowledge of the unit topic as they respond to guiding questions and use information from unit texts to record what they learned about each Enduring Understanding. After completing the Knowledge Blueprint at the end of Week 3, students participate in a culminating task to demonstrate their knowledge. Culminating tasks typically entail a small group Real World Perspectives: Constructive Conversation, a very brief time to share and reflect, and an independent writing task.

Materials provide for ongoing review, practice, self-reflection, and feedback. Materials provide multiple strategies, such as oral and/or written feedback, peer or teacher feedback, and self-reflection. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Students use the Research & Inquiry Project Tool and their Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebooks for reflection and feedback. After selecting a research focus, students “reflect on why they chose the topic and ask themselves if this is a topic they really care about.” After students begin researching and gathering facts and information about their selected topic, they “reflect on whether the facts relate to their guiding questions.” After students present their final research and inquiry project to the class, they reflect on “how their presentation went” and what went well about their presentation. The teacher uses the Important Notes or Reminders column to provide students with feedback during each step of the Research & Inquiry Project. During the Step 6: Reflect mini-lesson, students use the Question, Remember, Jot strategy to self-assess and self-reflect on the Research & Inquiry Project process and the knowledge they gained.      

  • The Informal Assessments manual includes opinion, informative/explanatory report, and personal narrative writing checklists for student use in Grades 2–6. Students typically self-assess their work during the final writing lesson of the unit.  

  • Some writing lessons include an Independent and Small-Group Writing and Conferring inset. This guidance supports teachers with observing students and providing support during writing tasks. For example, in Unit 8, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 3, students continue working on their research project. The Independent and Small-Group Writing Conferring guidance is as follows:

    • Directive Feedback: Starting with a question is a good way to grab your reader’s attention. Ask a question to start your introduction.

    • Self-Monitoring and Reflection: What technique can you add to this introduction to grab the reader’s attention?

    • Validating and Confirming: You wrote a strong introduction that catches the reader’s attention and introduces your topic clearly.     

Materials provide a clear path for students to monitor and move their own learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found 

Indicator 3P
Read

Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.

Although materials indicate which tasks pair or partner groups, materials do not provide guidance on how and when to use specific grouping strategies. Within instructional lessons, students transition between whole group and partner or pair activities, such as Constructive Conversations; Guided Practice; Annotate, Pair, Share; and Share and Reflect. Students rarely participate in small group settings outside of small group instruction.

Materials provide for varied types of interaction among students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each lesson includes opportunities for whole group, partner, and independent interactions. These grouping interactions occur during each daily lesson. For example, in Unit 6, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 3, students read and analyze source texts. The lesson begins in a whole group setting, with the teacher reading aloud the mentor source texts, “John Paul Jones” (author not cited) and “Bernardo de Galvez” (author not cited), and modeling how to underline key facts. After providing a summary of the central ideas in each passage, the teacher engages students in a discussion about the texts. Afterwards, students work with a partner to complete the Key Facts Chart. During independent work time, students complete another Key Facts Chart on the student source texts, "Deborah Samson" (author not cited) and "James Armistead" (author not cited).  

Materials provide limited guidance for the teacher on grouping students in a variety of grouping formats. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Review and Routines for Beginning the School Year materials include a few strategies for partnering students into pairs. On Day 1, the teacher uses Stand Up, Hand Up, Pair Up to create partner groups. On Day 2, the teacher lines up students according to their birthday month and uses that line to create partner groups. It is unclear when the teacher should use the Review and Routines materials, as they are not referenced in instructional lessons.

  • In Unit 3, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 13, students work with a partner to compare the text structures of “Voting Rights Act Address” by  President Lyndon B. Johnson and “Creating the Constitution” by Benjamin Godfrey. Materials do not provide guidance on how to partner students. 

  • In Unit 10, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 9, students use the selections from Transforming Matter (author not cited) to integrate information from various sources when discussing the following prompt during a Constructive Conversation: “How is Dalton's Atomic Theory relevant to Marie Daly's work linking the chemical reactions during digestion to human health in relationship to cholesterol? Cite specific evidence from ‘Marie M. Daly: Biochemistry Pioneer’ and ‘John Dalton: Father of the Atomic Theory’ to support your answer.” Materials do not provide guidance on how to partner students. 

Indicator 3Q
02/02

Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.

The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.

The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document. This document contains a three column list that identifies the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. The resources listed for English Learners include supplemental materials or supports that also apply to all students, such as the sentence stems for Constructive Conversations, Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, and Flipbooks. Materials include Integrated English Language Development (iELD) strategies, instructional supports that are specifically designed to help students meet or exceed grade-level standards, in the margins of the teacher-facing lesson materials for teachers. These supports include lesson-specific, multi-level strategies, sentence stems, and prompts for multilingual learners. Additionally, the Research and Inquiry Project guide includes an Addressing the Needs of Multilingual Learners section and lesson-specific multilingual learner supports, which include the sidebar features for multilingual learners in each of the seven standard mini-lessons. These lessons are not embedded in the core instructional plan and are up to the teacher’s discretion and time allowance. 

Materials provide strategies and support for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Supports for Exceptional Learners document lists the supports the materials provide for English language learners. Supports include Unit Introduction Videos, Suggested Language Objectives, Integrated English Language Development strategies, Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, Language Transfer Supports, Supporting Constructive Conversation sentence stems, Thinking-Speak-Listen Flipbooks, a Multilingual Glossary, Home Connection Letters, and a Contrastive Analysis of English and 9 World Languages document. 

  • Within each unit, the majority of the reading mini-lessons include a light orange text box labeled Integrated ELD (iELD). These Integrated English Language Development supports include three levels of scaffolding for student responses: Light Support, Moderate Support, and Substantial Support. The supports typically include sentence stems and additional scaffolds for student use when writing in response to or discussing questions about the texts they are reading. For example, in Unit 8, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 2, students read “The Voyage” by Mary Pope Osborne and an excerpt of The Odyssey by Homer. Students underline key details to write a summary. In the Integrated ELD (iELD) box, the Substantial Support recommendations include: “Help students use the paragraph frame to summarize the chapter. Odysseus sees a ___. She gives him her ___. It will protect him from ___.” 

  • The Research and Inquiry Project guide includes a one-page document,  Addressing the Needs of Multilingual Learners, and lesson-specific multilingual learner supports. This document is the sole place in which the program shares its perspective on multilingual learner support: “Keeping our multilingual learners in the forefront of our practice is critical to the equity work that we, as educators, embrace on a daily basis. We have the power and responsibility to create responsive learning conditions in order for all of our students to express themselves and build independence.”

Indicator 3R
Read

Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.

Materials, including texts and assessments, depict characters and individuals of varying ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. Materials typically present these diversities in a positive light. Materials include images and information with people of various demographics but do not include images and information with people of various physical characteristics. Depictions of individuals with different abilities was limited to characters with glasses on some of the individuals; these individuals were usually teachers and scientists. Though characters in illustrations represent various racial and ethnic backgrounds, there is an overlap on the depiction of people throughout the program’s grades. For example, Grades 3 and 6 feature texts about Rosa Parks which use the same images, but materials rarely address any other Civil Rights topics or leaders. Grades 3, 4, and 5 each have a text on César Chavez, but there is not a text on any other Hispanic leader. Materials also contain few core texts written by or about Native Americans. 

Materials and assessments sometimes depict different individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 1, the Unit Opener video includes a scene of a diverse group of young people, including a young man in a wheelchair, talking at a park. 

  • In Unit 6, the Texts for Close Reading selection is Up Against the Wild (author not cited). When introducing the essential question for the unit, materials include an image of a group of firefighters and a White female adventurer hiking a snow covered mountain. It is unclear if the image of the firefighters depicts individuals of different genders, races, and ethnicities. Selections such as the fable “Androcles and the Lion” by Aesop and “The Law of Club and Fang” from The Call of the Wild by Jack London include animal illustrations. The play excerpt “Brushfire!” by David Boelke includes minimal illustrations and it is unclear if those illustrations depict different individuals of different genders, races, and ethnicities. “The Knotted Branch” from The Winter People by Joseph Bruchac, an award-winning Native American author and professional storyteller, includes illustrations of its male Abenaki main character, Saxso. 

Materials and assessments balance positive portrayals of demographics or physical characteristics. Materials avoid stereotypes or language that might be offensive to a particular group. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 1, the front cover of the Texts for Close Reading book, Developing Characters’ Relationships (author not cited), one of the main characters in the excerpts from As Brave as You by Jason Reynolds is blind.

  • Both texts for the Interim Assessments depict true stories based on courageous women. In one text, Jerrie Mock completes a round-the-world trip on an airplane. In the second text, Ida Pfeiffer completes a harrowing ship voyage around Cape Horn.

Materials sometimes provide representations that show students that they can succeed in the subject, going beyond just showing photos of diverse students not engaged in work related to the context of the learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 7, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 1, students read “Native Americans in the Revolution” by Abigail Conklin. Students learn about Native Americans and their role in the American Revolution and how the American Revolution affected Native Americans.

  • In Unit 9, the Texts for Close Reading selection is The Economic Development of Cities (author not cited). One selection, “Chicago: An American Hub” by Ena Kao, includes images of male and female people of color serving as construction workers. Another selection, “The Great Migration and the Growth of Cities” by Monica Halpern, includes an image of “Cootie” Williams, a Duke Ellington band member, playing the trumpet in front of an African-American audience at a Harlem ballroom. The final vocabulary practice text, “Helping Communities Grow in New York City” (author not cited), includes an image of children, one of whom uses a wheelchair, in a community garden. This is the sole representation of someone with a disability in the selections. 

Indicator 3S
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.

Materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA. The Teacher Resource System includes a Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document; however, this document is not embedded within the daily lessons nor does it reference student home language. While the Integrated English Language Development (iELD) box within applicable lessons includes suggestions for differentiation and support, this resource does not address ways to help students incorporate their home language into their ELA learning. Although materials provide Home/School Connections letters in six different translations, the letter provides families with limited information such as the unit, vocabulary, and text students will engage with for the week; it does not present multilingualism as an assessment in reading. The Access and Equity resource does not offer guidance on leveraging home language, cultural knowledge, communities, and diversity as assets. Additionally, the suggested language objectives do not advise using a student's home language to facilitate literacy learning.

Materials provide limited suggestions and strategies to use the home language to support students in learning ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Informal Assessments manual includes developmental and individual reading behavior checklists, one of which is the Observation Checklist of First-Language Reading Behaviors and Experiences. This developmental checklist includes a list of six observable Literacy Behaviors and Experiences. Guidance directs the teacher to “[u]se this checklist to help you identify the level of support each of your new ELs may need.” The teacher rates each behavior or experience as yes, no, or do not know. Materials provide the following guidance to inform next steps: “If the student does not exhibit age-appropriate reading behaviors in his or her first language, you will need to provide intensive support and instruction in both English language and literacy. If the student demonstrates age-appropriate reading behaviors in his or her first language, the student is likely to make rapid literacy progress directly correlated with English-language development.” Although three of the observable behaviors and experiences address students’ home language, materials do not provide guidance or suggestions for teachers to use the home language to support students with their ELA learning. The Literacy Behaviors and Experiences are as follows: 

    • Student has attended school on a regular basis.

    • Student can show how a book is read.

    • Student recognizes familiar illustrations and photographs from literature.

    • Student can read in his or her first language.

    • Student can write in his or her first language.

    • Student can find first-language cognates in English texts.

Materials present multilingualism as an asset in reading, and students are explicitly encouraged to develop home language literacy and to use their home language strategically for learning how to negotiate texts in the target language. Teacher materials include guidance on how to garner information that will aid in learning, including the family’s preferred language of communication, schooling experiences in other languages, literacy abilities in other languages, and previous exposure to academic or everyday English. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Indicator 3T
Read

Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.

Materials provide limited guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon students' cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. Some Grammar in Context lessons include Language Transfer Supports. Materials also provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document; however, the use of this resource is optional. Materials contain a Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspective document; however, most of the questions and guidance miss opportunities to draw upon students’ linguistic or ethnic backgrounds. Materials include some prompts during which students talk about themselves and things they like to do with friends or at home. Other than language differences, linguistic and convention differences were not acknowledged in the materials. Materials include some instances in which the teacher might state that a word means hello in another language. The Access and Equity resource does not offer guidance on drawing upon students' cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. Rather, it offers general strategies such as the use of visuals (photos, diagrams with labels, illustrations), manipulatives, realia (real objects), hands-on activities, total physical response (TPR), gestures, graphic organizers, sentence frames, and other accommodations that minimize language barriers and maximize comprehension of the concepts. Sections of the materials provided in multiple languages are limited to a Multilingual Glossary and Home/School Connections letters that are offered in multiple languages. Materials provide some opportunities for students to feel acknowledged during tasks based on customs of other cultures. 

Materials make some connections to the linguistic, cultural, and conventions used in learning ELA. Materials make some connections to the linguistic and cultural diversity to facilitate learning. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include Language Transfer Supports in some Grammar in Context lessons. These supports are intended “to identify transfer issues some Els may have.” For example, in Unit 10, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 5, students use “Marie M. Daly: Biochemistry Pioneer” by Drake Conyers to review prepositions and prepositional phrases. The Language Transfer Support is as follows: “Many English prepositions have unique corresponding Spanish prepositions (behind/detrás; against/contra; beside/al lado; under/debajo; over/sobre). However, the English prepositions at, in, on and upon all translate into the same Spanish pronoun: en. Be aware that Spanish speakers may need additional support to understand the nuances in meaning between these prepositions and to use them correctly in their speaking and writing.”  

  • Materials provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document which identifies similarities and differences between English and nine other languages. This is an optional resource for teacher use to inform instruction to support students’ understanding of how English works in ways that are similar to or different from usages in their home language. The document can also serve as a scaffolding support for students. The document encourages teachers to “identify and capitalize on students’ existing language skills.” This resource is not connected to or referenced in instructional lessons.

Materials include teacher guidance on how to engage culturally diverse students in the learning of ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • No evidence found

Materials include some equity guidance and opportunities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Additional Resources tab of the Teacher Resource System includes an Access and Equity document. This document includes the following guidance: “Remember to think about the many aspects of the individual (culture, age, first language, socioeconomic level, and more). For example, wait time is both a common accommodation for students with disabilities who need additional time to process information and for English Learners who require additional time to process the second language.”

Materials include some opportunities for students to feel “acknowledged,” such as tasks based on customs of other cultures; sections provided in multiple languages such as the glossary, digital materials, family letters; etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Each unit includes a Multilingual Glossary that contains the vocabulary for that unit. The glossary provides a picture, definition, phonetic pronunciation, audio clip of pronunciation, part of speech, definition, and the word in a sentence. The written form of the vocabulary word is available in Arabic, French, Haitian Creole, Mandarin, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, and Vietnamese.

  • Materials provide Home/School Connections letters in each unit. The letters are available in six different languages: English, Haitian Creole, Mandarin, Portuguese, Spanish, and Arabic.

Materials include some prompts where students are encouraged to share how they (or their parents) do things at home or use information to create personal problems, etc. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • In Unit 3, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 1, the Culturally Responsive Persepctives section of the Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document addresses diversity, as students read “Liberty Medal Acceptance Speech” by Justice Thurgood Marshall. Teacher guidance includes, “Invite students to share examples of how people from different backgrounds contribute to a richer culture through their words in speech and in writing.” The instructional lesson includes an inset directing teachers to “[u]se the discussion prompts on pages 6–7 to engage students and make connections to their experiences and perspectives.”

  • In Unit 9, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 2, the Culturally Responsive Persepctives section of the Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives document addresses health, as students read “The Birth of Chicago” by Odia Wood-Krueger. Teacher guidance includes, “Invite students to name different languages that they know, or that are spoken by their friends and family. Talk about the benefits of knowing how to communicate in different languages.” The instructional lesson includes an inset directing teachers to “[u]se the discussion prompts on pages 6–7 to engage students and make connections to their experiences and perspectives.”

Indicator 3U
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Indicator 3V
Read

This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.

Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design

Read

The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.

Materials include digital tools for both teacher and student use including, but not limited to annotation tools such as a digital pen, digital highlighter, and digital post-it notes. Materials have limited digital technology for student and teacher communication. Teachers can monitor students' work and progress and leave feedback and notes using digital tools built into the e-Notebook. Teacher collaboration is limited to the ability to share customized e-Book materials with other teachers at that school or in that district. Materials have a visual design that supports learning and is not chaotic nor does it distract from student learning. The teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure within and throughout the units and across each grade. The Benchmark Universe Dashboard homepage includes a Benchmark Academy section with PD about curriculum resources. The training tab includes Benchmark Universe How to Videos, such as Tech Talks and e-Assessment Teacher and Administrator Modules on assigning, previewing, and grading assessments as well as navigating the reports.

Indicator 3W
Read

Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.

Materials include digital tools for both teacher and student use including, but not limited to annotation tools such as a digital pen, digital highlighter, and digital post-it notes. Materials can also be activated to provide audio for words, sections, or the entire text. Materials include a digital pocket chart for whole group, small group, or individual students that comes with ready-made digital cards. The eBooks do not include digital tools for manipulation such as drag and drops, sorts, or organizers. Interim, Unit, and Weekly assessments are digitized and once completed can produce standards-based reports at the student, class, school, and district level. The materials can be filtered and assigned individually. Although teachers and students can customize some digital materials for local classroom use, materials do not include guidance for customizing at the district or school level.

Digital technology and interactive tools, such as data collection tools, simulations, and/or modeling tools are available to students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Universe e-Books include interactive tools for teacher use when modeling and for students to use when reading. Features include a zoom tool, a pen/highlighter tool, an expandable margin for capturing notes, and audio read by a person with a speed adaptation feature. The audio tool can read the whole section or individual words when activated. Materials also include tools so students can add a digital post-it, a shape, or a screen shade.

  • The e-Book includes additional tools for teacher use, including ways to customize the text and add videos, blank pages, or hyperlinks.

  • Materials provide e-Assessments for the Weekly, Unit, and Interim Assessments. The reporting platform provides teachers with assessment data, such as a standards-based report that shows teachers which standards were not met. Digital assessment reports are available at the student, class, school, and distinct levels. The reporting platform also includes a feature to create groups based on the results of the assessments. 

Digital tools support student engagement in ELA. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials include a Texts for Close Reading e-Book, Knowledge Building Library e-Book, Build-Reflect-Write e-Notebook, and a Word Study Practice Text e-Book that provide students with an interactive experience through the use of digital tools. Digital features include audio support and annotation/note taking.  

  • Materials provide an e-Pocket Chart that can be used to work with students on activities such as word building, sorts, and sentence building. This feature includes digital cards of letters, word parts, words, punctuation, and images. 

Digital materials can be customized for local use (i.e., student and/or community interests). Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The digital Benchmark Universe Library is arranged by filters, materials, and two digital storage sections: Bookshelf and Assignments. Teachers can drag and drop lessons and/or materials into the two digital storing tiles to customize their resources and to share them with other teachers. 

Indicator 3X
Read

Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.

Materials have limited digital technology for student and teacher communication. Teachers can monitor students' work and progress and leave feedback and notes using digital tools built into the e-Notebook. Teacher collaboration is limited to the ability to share customized e-Book materials with other teachers at that school or in that district.

Materials include or reference some digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Teachers can monitor students' work and leave feedback or notes for individual students, in the Build-Reflect-Write e-notebooks

  • The Texts for Close Reading for each unit includes an e-Book that can be customized. Teachers can share customized pages of the e-Book with teachers at the same school or district.  

Indicator 3Y
Read

The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.

Materials have a visual design that supports learning. The design is not chaotic nor does it distract from student learning. The teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure within and throughout the units and across each grade. The Teacher Resource System consistently includes headings that signal when support is available for a specific purpose, as seen in the following section headers: Engage, Model, Guided Practice, Connect to Knowledge Turn & Talk, and Apply to Understand Build Knowledge. Teacher materials include icons and links to Additional Materials as well as student text icons to click on to connect to the student text. Materials are typically error-free. 

Images, graphics, and models support student learning and engagement without being visually distracting. Images, graphics, and models clearly communicate information or support student understanding of topics, texts, or concepts. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials balance the use of blank space on home and landing pages in the Teacher Resource System, as well as in the student My Reading and Writing eBook. 

  • Materials consistently use the same icons throughout each grade and unit, including student-facing instructional activities.

  • Teacher support and guidance is clearly and consistently labeled throughout units which include Access suggestions, Integrated English Language supports, sample student responses, and sample anchor charts.

  • Each unit includes a Unit Opener video that supports student learning and engagement for the upcoming unit. For example, in Unit 6, the Opener Video introduces the idea of people surviving in nature from the elements and their fears and the Unit’s  essential question, “What compels us to survive?”

Teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure across lessons/modules/units. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The Benchmark Advance homepage contains links to program resources, the Teacher’s Resource System, and instructional resources. Resources can be filtered by grade level and unit. 

  • Each unit homepage contains the following tabs: 

    • Overview, Unit Resources, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Additional Resources

  • Each unit section contains a drop down menu with more tabs. 

    • The Overview section includes the following tabs: Content Knowledge Alignment, Vertical Progression of Knowledge-Building Unit Topics and Essential Questions, Author & Consultant Team, About the Program, Pacing Options and Sample Literacy Block, and Digital and Print Components.

    • The Unit Resources section includes the following tabs: Unit Opener, Strategies and Skills, Unit Components at a Glance, Intervention and Reteaching Resources, Guide to Text Complexity, Social-Emotional Learning & Culturally Responsive Perspectives, Vocabulary Development, Pathways to Knowledge, Research and Inquiry Project, and Suggested Language Objectives.

    • Each Week contains a Weekly Resources tab and a Mini-Lessons tab. 

    • The Additional Resources section includes the following tabs: Instructional Routines and Strategies, Constructive Conversation, Speaking and Writing Response Protocols, Reading Big Words, Managing an Independent Reading Program, Recommended Trade Books, Text Evidence/Close Reading Answer Key, Real-World Perspectives: Supporting Constructive  Conversations, Small Group Texts for Reteaching Strategies and Skills, Guide to Text Complexity, Access & Equity, and Contrastive Analysis.

Organizational features (Table of Contents, glossary, index, internal references, table headers, captions, etc.) in the materials are clear, accurate, and error-free. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Materials are typically free of errors; however, some icons in several units appear to have broken links and provide an error message on the digital platform rather than open the student text.

Indicator 3Z
Read

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.

The Benchmark Universe Dashboard homepage includes a Benchmark Academy section. This section includes a PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab.  The training tab includes Benchmark Universe How to Videos, such as Tech Talks and e-Assessment Teacher and Administrator Modules on assigning, previewing, and grading assessments as well as navigating the reports. The Benchmark Advance homepage includes student how-to videos on accessing assignments, navigating the digital platform, and using eBook tools and distance learning resources. 

Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The PD Training: Curriculum Resources support teachers with understanding the program and its associated resources. The Tech Talks support teachers with navigating eBook tools and features, customizing resources, sharing and accessing customizations, assigning resources, and managing assignments. 

  • The PD Training: Curriculum Resources and the Benchmark Advance landing pages house student how-to videos. These videos support students with accessing assignments, navigating Benchmark Universe, and using eBook tools and distance learning resources. 

  • The Benchmark Advance homepage includes a Distance Learning Printable Packet Options section. This section includes resources to support student and parent engagement and offers educators strategies to support online student learning. Materials include a three-part video series designed to help parents support their students with the program at home. Materials also include a three-part video series for teachers to support them with starting distance learning, engaging asynchronous and synchronous small group and whole group lessons, and providing and monitoring feedback to students.  

  • Within each unit, the Overview section includes a Digital & Print Components tab. This document outlines which items are digital and which items are print. Additionally, the document explains how the teacher can use the components to support student learning.