About This Report
- EdReports reviews are one tool to support curriculum decisions. We do not make recommendations, and our reports are not prescriptive.
- Use this report as part of a comprehensive, teacher-led adoption process that prioritizes local needs and integrates multi-year implementation planning throughout.
- EdReports evaluates materials based on the quality of their design: how well they structure evidence-based teaching and learning to support college and career-readiness. We do not assess their effectiveness in practice.
- Check the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used. Our current tools are version 2.0. Reports based on earlier tools (versions 1.0 or 1.5) offer valuable insights but may not fully align with current instructional priorities.
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Amplify Science | Science
Product Notes
These reports reflect both the 2022 review and the focused review of Indicator 1i and Gateway 3 for Grade 2 in 2023
Science K-2
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning partially meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems drive learning and use of the three dimensions at the unit level in multiple instances but infrequently at the chapter or activity level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for life science, physical science and earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices at the grade band and nearly all elements of the practices at grade level, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Science 3-5
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but inconsistently leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at the unit level but not at the chapter or activity level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 3-5 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for life science, physical science and earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices at the grade band and nearly all elements of the practices at grade level, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
3rd Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
4th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
5th Grade
View Full ReportEdReports reviews determine if a program meets, partially meets, or does not meet expectations for alignment to college and career-ready standards. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Materials must meet expectations for standards alignment in order to be reviewed for usability. This rating reflects the overall series average.
Usability (Gateway 3)
Report for 5th Grade
Alignment Summary
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Alignment to NGSS, Gateways 1 and 2. Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations. The materials include three-dimensional learning opportunities and opportunities for student sensemaking with the three dimensions. The formative and summative assessments consistently measure the three dimensions for their respective objectives. Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations. Phenomena and problems are present, connected to DCIs, and presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but do not leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. Phenomena and problems consistently drive learning and use of the three dimensions at the unit level but not consistently at the chapter or activity level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence and Scope. The materials connect units and chapters in a manner that is apparent to students, and student tasks increase in sophistication within and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices but not all elements of the practices are present. The materials include all grade-level SEP elements and nearly all elements across the band, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
5th Grade
Alignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Overview of Gateway 1
Designed for NGSS
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning meets expectations and Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning meets expectations.
Gateway 1
v1.5
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning
Materials are designed for three-dimensional learning and assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Criterion 1a-1c: Three-Dimensional Learning. The materials consistently include integration of the three dimensions in at least one learning opportunity per learning sequence and nearly all learning sequences are meaningfully designed for student opportunity to engage in sensemaking with the three dimensions. The materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the chapter level that build towards the performance expectations for the larger unit, and consistently assess to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives. The units also include three-dimensional objectives and include corresponding assessments that consistently address the three dimensions of the objectives.
Indicator 1A
Materials are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning.
Indicator 1A.i
Materials consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning opportunities. The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities. Throughout the grade level, all learning sequences (chapters) include three dimensions and consistently integrate SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs in student learning opportunities (lessons). The materials are designed for students to actively engage in the SEPs and CCCs to deepen understanding of DCIs. Three-dimensional connections are outlined for teachers at the unit, chapter, and lesson level.
Examples of where materials are designed to integrate the three dimensions into student learning opportunities:
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.6: Explaining How Raindrops Form, students read a text about water’s importance and examine provided data (SEP-INFO-E4). After learning about the water cycle, students conclude that water is part of a larger system on the island and is not disappearing; it is due to the larger systems of the hydrosphere (DCI.PS1.A-E1, DCI.PS1.A-E2, and CCC-SYS-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Introducing Ecosystems, students view photographs in a slideshow to gain information about rainforests and the impact of farming on the living things in the ecosystem (CCC-SYS-E2). Students develop arguments (SEP-ARG-E4) about the reasons why these organisms aren't thriving (DCI-LS2.A-E1). Students use a text (SEP-INFO-E1) to make observations about other ecosystems.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Nutrients and Soil, students use qualitative and quantitative data (SEP-DATA-E2) to compare soil types and the resulting plant life (DCI-LS1.C-E2, CCC-CE-C1). Through the use of the simulation (SEP-MOD-E6), students collect evidence to construct an argument (SEP-ARG-E1) about the importance of mushrooms and how they maintain balance in an ecosystem (DCI-LS2.A-E1, CCC-SYS-E2).
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns in the Night Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Distances to the Stars, students engage in a learning sequence to investigate why stars look so small. Students use the Patterns of Earth and Sky Simulation to investigate the distance from earth to the sun and to other stars. Students use the data that was collected to create a scale model (CCC-SPQ-E1) of the earth, the sun, and four other stars (DCI-ESS1.A-E1, SEP-MOD-E1, and SEP-MOD-E5).
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns in the Night Sky, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Modeling Earth’s Orbit, students discuss the position and motion of objects in the sky (DCI-ESS1.B-E1). With a "sun" at the center of the room, each student acts as a model of earth, carrying out the motions of spinning and orbiting (SEP-MOD-E4) to explain the patterns of stars (CCC-PAT-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Introducing Food Science, students conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-E3) where they make observations about three different mystery mixtures. Students then discuss class results with another student (SEP-INFO-E5) and explain that properties can be used to identify substances (DCI-PS1.A-E1) and that the particle interactions can cause mixtures to behave differently (CCC-SPQ-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit 2: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.5: Making Sense of Solubility, students read information about molecules (SEP-INFO-E4) and use a simulation that models varying degrees of solubility (SEP-MOD-E3); they combine information from these sources to explain the molecular interactions (CCC-SPQ-E1) involved in solutions. Students use the information from these activities and from prior lessons to evaluate explanations of two solutions and discuss what is happening at the molecular level (DCI-PS1B.E1).
Indicator 1A.ii
Materials consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions. Each learning sequence (chapter), includes multiple lessons where students progress towards the goals of the respective chapter and unit. While the materials consistently include opportunities for students to engage in the three dimensions in each chapter, not all lessons provide opportunities for students to build and use all three dimensions for sensemaking. However, the materials do consistently provide an opportunity in at least one lesson per chapter for students to engage in using the science and engineering practices (SEPs) and the crosscutting concepts (CCCs) to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions.
Examples where SEPs and CCCs meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions in the learning sequence:
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Water Shortages, Water Solutions, students discuss the different ways that humans use water in their daily lives and how the availability of water impacts the use of water by humans (DCI-ESS2.C-E1, CCC-CE-E2). Students consider the question “How can people affect how much freshwater is available?” and use the student reader to learn more about what causes water shortages (SEP-INFO-E3).
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.1: Investigating the Movement of Water Vapor, students examine how the shape of the land and movement of water vapor within the atmosphere affects rainfall. Through the use of a simulation, students determine where the island will receive rain. Students return to consider the island’s shape, landscape, direction of wind, and compare that to other islands using the online simulation (DCI-ESS2.B-E1). Then students use the simulation program to model what factors affect how water vapor moves in the air (SEP-MOD-E4) to understand how each component of this system (CCC-SYS-E2) interacts and produces the patterns of rainfall (CCC-PAT-E2).
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.3: How Plants Make Food, students explore how plants grow by producing their own food. Students create a board game that simulates photosynthesis and then create a digital model (SEP-MOD-E4, SEP-MOD-E6) to make sense of how plants get food and grow (DCI-LS1.C-E2, DCI-PS3.D-E2). In their models, students illustrate the relationships among the sun, plants, and animals within an ecosystem (CCC-SYS-E2). Students do a short writing activity to synthesize new knowledge learned and how it relates to cecropia trees (DCI-LS2.A-E1, SEP-INFO-E2) and their growth.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Nutrients and Soil, students explore how an ecosystem is affected if a mushroom is removed from the system. Students use qualitative and quantitative data (SEP-DATA-E2) to compare soil types and the resulting plant life (DCI-LS1.C-E2, CCC-CE-C1). Through the use of the simulation (SEP-MOD-E6), students collect evidence to construct an argument (SEP-ARG-E1) about the importance of mushrooms and how they maintain balance in an ecosystem (DCI-LS2.A-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns in the Night Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Distances to the Stars, students investigate why stars look very small. Students use the Patterns of Earth and Sky Simulation to investigate the distance from earth to the sun and to other stars. Students use the data to create a scale model (CCC-SPQ-E1) of earth, the sun, and four other stars (DCI-ESS1.A-E1, SEP-MOD-E1, and SEP-MOD-E5).
In Grade 5, Module: Patterns in the Night Sky Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Modeling Earth’s Orbit, students discuss the position and motion of objects in the sky (DCI-ESS1.B-E1). With a "sun" at the center of the room, each student acts as a model of earth, carrying out the motions of spinning and orbiting (SEP-MOD-E4) to visualize the patterns of stars (CCC-PAT-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Introducing Food Science, students describe a mixture (ketchup) and then observe various food mixtures. The class discusses their observations as a group. Students begin to make sense of how materials and mixture have different properties (DCI-PS1.A-E1) based on the particles and how they interact with one another (CCC-SPQ-E1). Students observe the properties of these mixtures and compare them (SEP-INV-E3) then discuss their data as a group (SEP-INFO-E5) and start to guess what each mixture is made of.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, students observe properties of solubility in the classroom and through an online simulation. Students create a digital model (SEP-MOD-E3) to explain what happens at the molecular level (SEP-CEDS-E2). The models show why some items dissolve in water and some do not based on attraction of molecules (DCI-PS1.B-E1, CCC-SPQ-E1).
Indicator 1B
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for three-dimensional learning.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials. The materials consistently provide learning objectives in the form of 3-D Statements for each Lesson, Chapter, and Unit. Lesson 3-D Statements build to support Chapter 3-D Statements, and the Chapter 3-D Statements build toward Unit 3-D Statements. In addition to the Chapter 3-D Statements, there are Chapter Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives that specify the focal elements of each dimension for the chapter, often using strikethroughs to indicate aspects not intended to be addressed. The Lessons contain individual assessments that often target a subset of the SEPs and/or CCCs included in a Chapter 3-D Statement, but over the course of the Chapter, assessments are consistently designed to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions in support of the Chapter Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives.
In addition to listing intended standards alignment, in the Teacher Guide for each Unit, Teacher References, Assessment System, and the Formative and Summative Assessment Opportunities section lists the DCI, SEP, and the CCC addressed in each Lesson-level assessment and includes strikethroughs of the portion of the standard that is not assessed. Assessments throughout Grade 5 consistently address the learning objectives.
Lessons, Chapters, and Units consistently incorporate tasks for the purpose of supporting the instructional process. Opportunities are provided through the use of two assessment types used in each Chapter: On-the-Fly Assessments and Critical Junctures. Rubrics at the Grade 3 level are consistent in format and methodology. Suggestions for multi-modal reteaching or ongoing re-visiting of the practices, crosscutting concepts or disciplinary core ideas while continuing instruction are not provided.
Examples of lessons with a three-dimensional objective where the formative assessment task(s) assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective, and provide guidance to support the instructional process:
In Grade 5, Unit Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 2: Why aren’t the cecropia trees growing and thriving?, the three-dimensional objectives are present as the Chapter Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives, representing eight elements of the three dimensions. In the fifth On-the-Fly Assessment, students synthesize and write down new understandings from a text they read then discuss where the food molecules for plants come from (DCI-LS1.C-E2, DCI-PS3.D-E2, SEP-INFO-E1). On-the-Fly Assessment 6 measures students’ ability to write a scientific explanation about where cecropia trees get their molecules (DCI-PS3.D-E1, DCI-LS2.A-E1, DCI-LS2.B-E1, DCI-LS1.C-E2). In On-the-Fly Assessment 7, students work together in groups to develop a model showing the transfer of energy in an ecosystem (food web) and present these models to the class (DCI-PS3.D-E2, CCC-EM-E3). In On-the-Fly Assessment 8, students read Why do Scientists Argue? and record ideas about how scientists prove their claims today, how Rachel Carson proved her ideas, and their own experiences with scientific argumentation (SEP-INFO-E2). In Critical Juncture Assessment 2, students construct an argument to answer the question: Why aren’t the cecropia trees growing and thriving? Students are directed to include their ideas about food molecules in their arguments and are provided a list of three claims to choose from (DCI-LS1.C-E2, DCI-PS3.D-E2, DCI-LS2.B-E1, SEP-INFO-E5, SEP-ARG-E4, CCC-EM-E2). The combination of these assessments are designed to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the learning objectives.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1: Why did the food coloring separate into different dyes?, the three-dimensional objectives are present as the Chapter Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives, representing eight elements of the three dimensions. In the first On-the-Fly Assessment, students observe and compare the properties of food mixtures like color, smell, texture, and viscosity, then make observations of the properties of each mixture and compare the mixtures (DCI-PS1.A-E3). In the second On-the-Fly Assessment, students read pages of Made of Matter and then place the following in order according to their size: “1 drop of water; 1,000,000 water molecules; 1 water molecule; 1 atom; 1 glass of water” using pictures and text from the book (DCI-PS1.A-E1, CCC-SPQ-E1). In the third On-the-Fly Assessment, students use a listening routine to discuss their ideas about the similarities and differences between molecules (DCI-PS1.A-E1). In the fourth On-the-Fly Assessment, students draw and label a model representation of a fan blowing model molecules of foam balls, rocks, and hook and loop tape across a medium of felt (partial DCI-PS1.A-E3). In the fifth On-the-Assessment, students draw nanovision models to show what happened to water molecules and food coloring molecules in a chromatography investigation (DCI-PS1.A-E1, SEP-MOD-E4) and teachers are directed to ask students to explain how their models help explain why the dyes are different colors (DCI-PS1.A-E3). In the sixth On-the-Fly Assessment, students create digital nanovision models with a partner to show what happens to water molecules and food coloring molecules in a chromatography investigation (DCI-PS1.A-E1) and students are directed to think about the different properties of the molecules when developing their model (DCI-PS1.A-E3). In the seventh On-the-Fly Assessment, students read Break It Down: How Scientists Separate Mixtures and complete a set of inferences about different mixtures based on their understanding of molecules and the information they read in the book (DCI-PS1.A-E1, DCI-PS1.A-E3). Students record the information along with the pages in the book that lead them to their inferences (SEP-INFO-E1). In the eighth On-the-Fly Assessment, students evaluate two competing models for explaining the chromatography investigation, identify what each model explains, and then identify whether the model fits with what they have figured out about molecules (DCI-PS1.A-E1, SEP-MOD-E1). Critical Juncture Assessment 1 is a two part formative assessment where students draw a final model to explain the chromatography investigation (DCI-PS1.A-E1, DCI-PS1.A-E3) and then construct a written explanation about why the food dye separated into different colors (SEP-INFO-E5, SEP-CEDS-E1). The combination of these assessments are designed to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the learning objectives.
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 4: Why is there more water vapor high up over West Ferris than East Ferris?, the three-dimensional objectives are present as the Chapter Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives, representing ten elements of the three dimensions. In On-the-Fly Assessment 9, students use The Earth System Simulation to discover what factors can affect how water vapor moves to different areas in the atmosphere (SEP-INV-E1). Students then compare how water vapor would move across two landscapes and reflect on how a mountain and the wind can affect rainfall (DCI-ESS2.A-E2). On-the-Fly Assessment 10 uses a simulation to assess how students engage in the practice of testing variables, ensuring that students are changing one variable (such as wind direction) and waiting to notice the results before changing another (CCC-SYS-E2). Additionally students synthesize information from this investigation and from reading How the Earth System Explains Dinosaur Extinction (SEP-INFO-E1, DCI-ESS2.A-E1). Students iterate on a previous freshwater collection design in On-the-Fly Assessment 11, evaluating their previous design and determining what they will improve (SEP-CEDS-E5, SEP-ETS1.B-E2, SEP-ETS1.B-E3, SEP-ETS1.C-E1). In Critical Juncture Assessment 3, students evaluate their rainshadow models to answer questions about the rainshadow effect and explain why water droplets condense to form rain more on one side of a mountain than another (DCI-PS1.A-E1, DCI-PS1.A-E2, DCI-ESS2.A-E1). The combination of these assessments are designed to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the learning objectives.
Indicator 1C
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials. Materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives for each unit in the form of Unit Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives; these typically consist of one or more disciplinary core ideas (DCIs), science and engineering practices (SEPs), and crosscutting concepts (CCCs). These objectives include a subset of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs identified within the Chapter Level Targeted 3-D Learning Objectives. Consistently, these Unit-level objectives indicate the specific elements targeted for each DCI, SEP, or CCC and in some instances strike though portions of elements that are not targeted.
Each unit provides summative assessments in the form of End of Unit (EOU) assessments and rubrics. Additionally, one unit (Sunlight and Weather) in this grade contains an Investigation Assessment. The combination of summative assessments for each unit consistently measure student learning of the three dimensions highlighted in the unit-level 3-D Statements.
The materials provide additional resources that also connect grade-level performance expectations (PEs) to specific units. The PEs are connected to the unit in the unit-level document. This alignment document indicates where formative and summative assessments are intended to occur in each chapter and includes targets for assessment that are beyond the scope of the specific unit, including assessments in other units in the grade and in other units across the grade band. In many instances, dimensions of the PEs connected to a specific unit are not assessed in that unit. For example, the 3-D Assessment Objectives document indicates that three PEs are connected to the Grade 5 Patterns of Earth and Sky unit. Summative assessments for this unit are designed to assess all three dimensions in one of the PEs associated with this unit; however, most of the dimensions associated with the other targeted PEs are not assessed. These three PEs collectively include two SEPs, three DCIs, and three CCCs. One of the SEPs, one of the CCCs, and all three of the DCIs are cross-referenced to summative assessment opportunities in this unit. Element-level specification is not provided.
Examples where the materials provide three-dimensional learning objectives for the learning sequence; summative tasks measure student achievement of the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives:
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, the unit-level objective is framed by the statement, “Students investigate why we see different stars at different times, using digital and kinesthetic models to figure out what causes (cause and effect) daily and yearly patterns (patterns) of Earth and sky.” This statement is followed by specific elements of DCIs, SEPs, and/or CCCs that are specifically targeted. Summative assessments include EOU assessments and rubrics; collectively, they are three-dimensional and consistently assess the targeted elements of the Unit objective(s).
In the EOU Assessment, students write explanations (SEP-ARG-E4) about why the sky looks different in different sections of an artifact. Students draw the missing constellation in the artifact and write an explanation to answer the questions: “Why does the sky look different in each nighttime section of the artifact?”, “Why does the nighttime section of the artifact show other stars in the sky but not the sun?” (DCI-ESS1.A-E1), “Why does the daytime section of the artifact show only the sun in the sky, but not other stars?”, and “On Earth, why does the pattern of daytime and nighttime repeat every day?” (DCI-ESS1.B-E1, CCC-PAT-E3). Students then complete a diagram and explain why a person does not fall off earth (DCI-PS2.B-E1).
Prompts and rubrics are provided. Rubric 1 assesses student understanding and application of the practice concept of planning and conducting investigations (SEP-INV-E1). Rubric 2 is used to assess student application of the practice analyzing and interpreting data (SEP-DATA-P3). Rubric 3 is used to assess students’ understanding of science ideas related to a daily and yearly pattern of stars in the sky (DCI-ESS1.A-E1, DCI-PS2.B-E1). Rubric 4 is used to assess the students’ understanding and application of the cross-cutting concept by using patterns to support their explanation of the position of stars at different times (CCC-PAT-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, the unit-level objective is framed by the statement, “Students are introduced to the particulate model of matter (energy and matter) and apply it in their role as food scientists as they explain how to separate a food-coloring mixture and how to create a stable salad dressing (stability and change). They do this by making firsthand observations of a variety of macroscale phenomena involved in separating and creating mixtures and then by creating diagram models and using physical and digital models to visualize what might be happening at the nanoscale (scale, proportion, and quantity).” This statement is followed by specific elements of DCIs, SEPs, and/or CCCs that are specifically targeted. Summative assessments include EOU assessments and rubrics; collectively, they are three-dimensional and consistently assess the targeted elements of the Unit objective(s).
In the EOU Assessment, students construct a scientific explanation about why some ingredients separate and how emulsifiers can change that. The End-of-Unit Assessment assesses students' understanding of the CCC of scale, proportion, and quantity (CCC-SPQ-E1); and the SEP of constructing explanations (SEP-CEDS-E2). Although understanding of the CCC and SEP are required, they are not explicitly assessed. Using the information that students have gathered from text and experience, as well as their understanding of the nanoscale that they’ve developed through drawing and investigating models of molecules, students write scientific explanations about why the ingredients in the salad dressing will stay mixed. The assessment checks for students’ understanding of molecular properties of mixing substances (DCI-PS1.B.E1) and that matter is made up of small particles (DCI-PS1A-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, the unit-level objective is framed by the statement, “Students use models to investigate why a reforested area of a Costa Rican rain forest is not thriving (energy and matter, systems and system models, cause and effect). Students use evidence to construct oral and written arguments about why the living things in this rain forest ecosystem are not growing and thriving (energy and matter, systems and system models, cause and effect).” This statement is followed by specific elements of DCIs, SEPs, and/or CCCs that are specifically targeted. Summative assessments include EOU assessments and rubrics; collectively, they are three-dimensional and consistently assess the targeted elements of the Unit objective(s).
In the EOU Assessment, students finish a diagram, adding symbols and labels to tell how the mice, snakes, grass, and mushrooms grow, including what they know about molecules and energy (SEP-MOD-E5, DCI-LS2.B-E1, DCI-LS2.A-E1). Students use the data provided plus their diagram to write an argument about why snakes are not thriving in a particular area (SEP-AUG-E4, DCI-LS1.C-E2, and DCI-PS3.D-E2).
Prompts and rubrics are provided. Rubric 1 assesses students' ability to construct an argument and support their claim with evidence and reasoning (SEP-ARG-E4) about the snakes in the ecosystem. Students use the data provided to make evidence-based claims on the factors that might impact the health of the ecosystem. Rubric 2 assesses student understanding of the DCIs related to how food provides animals with materials they need for growth and survival (DCI-LS1.C-E1), that energy released from food traces back to plants (DCI-PS3.D-E2, DCI-LS2.A-E1), and that matter cycles through ecosystems (DCI-LS2.B-E1). Rubric 3 assesses student understanding that matter is made from particles (CCC-EM-E1) and these particles are used for “food” for plants and animals, and matter can move through systems and be tracked through the different feeding levels in an ecosystem. The assessment does not specifically assess the components of the objectives related to the jaguars or sloths in a Costa Rican rainforest.
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, the unit-level objective is framed by the statement, “Students investigate how interactions between the parts of the Earth system affect the movement and distribution of water (systems and system models), and they apply their understanding to design solutions for a water shortage. Students also obtain information from first hand investigations, models, and text to figure out and construct written explanations of how new substances can form through chemical reactions (cause and effect), even though no matter is created or destroyed (energy and matter).” Summative assessments include EOU assessments and rubrics; collectively, they are three-dimensional and partially assess the highlighted elements within the objective.
In the EOU Assessment, students write a scientific explanation (SEP-CEDS-E2) for why West Ferris gets more rain than East Ferris (DCI-PS1.A-E1). Students describe how new substances can form through chemical reactions, in the context of adding substances to wastewater to get rid of harmful substances.
Prompts and rubrics are provided. Rubric 1 assesses student ability to construct an explanation and support the explanation with evidence and reasoning (SEP-CEDS-E2) about why each side of the island receives a different amount of rain (DCI-PS1.A-E1). Rubric 2 assesses student understanding of the DCIs related to the concepts that rain occurs when water vapor gets cold and condenses into liquid water and mountains can redirect water vapor higher in the atmosphere (DCI-ESS2.A-P1, DCI-ESS2.A-E1). Rubric 3 assesses student understanding that there are multiple components of the system (hydrosphere, atmosphere, and geosphere) and interactions among the components determine where the rain falls (CCC-SYS-E2).
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning
Materials leverage science phenomena and engineering problems in the context of driving learning and student performance.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Criterion 1d-1i: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning. The materials include phenomena in 76% of the chapters and problems in 6% of chapters. Of those phenomena and problems, they consistently connect to grade-level appropriate DCIs and are consistently presented to students as directly as possible. The materials consistently elicit but do not leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present. The materials consistently incorporate phenomena or problems to drive learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple chapters within each unit. Multiple instances of phenomena or problems driving learning and use of the three dimensions are present within the chapters.
Indicator 1D
Phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs). Within the grade, the materials provide opportunities for students to build an understanding of grade-level DCIs through unit-level or chapter-level phenomena or problems. In many cases, multiple lesson investigations work together to connect to a single phenomenon and/or problem to develop an understanding of corresponding DCIs. Across the series, students engage in a variety of disciplines including life science, earth science, and physical science while developing a deeper understanding of the engineering design cycle as they apply DCIs to the design problem.
Examples of phenomena and problems connected to grade-level appropriate DCIs or their elements.
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: End of Unit Assessments, the phenomenon is that we see different stars in the sky on different nights. Throughout the lesson, students use the Patterns of Earth and Sky Simulation to design their own investigation and collect data on how different stars’ visibility changes from month-to-month throughout the year (DCI-ESS1.B-E1). Students use the data they collect to explain observable patterns in the data.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.5: Exploring Another Model of Chromatography, the phenomenon is that food coloring separates into three dyes. Throughout the lesson, students explore two different models, chromatography and a “fan” model, to understand that matter can be subdivided into smaller particles and then the particles can be identified by their properties (DCI-PS1.A-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students are presented with a problem statement where they are asked to design a solution for East Ferris’ water shortage. Throughout the lesson, students use data to infer that much of the water on East Ferris is trapped in groundwater due to human use (DCI-ESS3.C-E1). Students applying what they know about conservation of matter (DCI-PS1.A-E2) to design a way to convert salt water to fresh water. They engage in the engineering process (DCI-ETS1.A-E1) to design a way to convert saltwater into freshwater.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.2 : Introducing Ecosystems, the phenomenon is that the jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees in a reforested section of a Costa Rican rain forest are not growing or thriving. In this lesson, students take on the role of ecologists as the teacher provides an overview of the rainforest that they will be studying more deeply. Students discuss how the organisms live together in this ecosystem and meet their needs (DCI-LS2.A-E1). Using data provided, students compare populations in a healthy forest to one impacted by the human activity of deforestation (DCI-ESS3.C-E1).
Indicator 1E
Phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible. Across the grade level, lessons present phenomena and problems to students as directly as possible. In multiple instances, students are initially presented the phenomenon or problem through pictures and videos that are accompanied by a scenario.
Examples of phenomena and/or problems presented to students as directly as possible
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.1: Pre-Unit Assessment, students are introduced to the phenomenon, “one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other does not.” Students are shown a projected image of a fictional location, Ferris Island, which demonstrates one side being lush and green and the other side being rocky. Since this is a fictional place, the introduction is the most direct way for students to interact with the problem as the island does not exist. The image of the island allows for observation of the differences across the island.
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students are presented with a problem statement where they are asked to design a solution for East Ferris’ water shortage. This problem connects to the Anchor Phenomenon for the unit, where students already observed (through pictures) that one side of the island has enough water to grow plants and the other side does not. Students receive a task card with criteria and constraints as they are challenged to convert salt water into fresh water. The prior lessons provide students with a direct way to understand the context of this design challenge.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Introducing Ecosystems, the phenomenon is that the jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees in a reforested section of a Costa Rican rain forest are not growing or thriving. Students are presented with the phenomenon through pictures of the animals and of the rainforest. Students discuss the habitat as a group and look at data comparing the populations of the animals and plants in this ecosystem. Since first-hand observations are not practical, presenting this phenomenon through pictures, discussions, and data is a direct method.
In Grade 5, Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, the phenomenon is that some ingredients disappear while others do not. Students are introduced to this phenomenon at the nanoscale through a digital simulation. This simulation allows students to combine molecules of different substances in a dish, stir, and see what happens at the nanoscale. The simulation provides the most direct way for students to observe this phenomenon.
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Student’s Investigations of Constellations or Stars, the phenomenon is that we see different stars in the sky on different nights. Students are introduced to this phenomenon through a digital simulation that allows students to observe and collect data on how different stars’ visibility changes from month to month throughout the year. Since students cannot observe the same star throughout an entire year, the simulation is the most direct way for students to interact with the phenomenon.
Indicator 1F
Phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems drive individual chapters using key elements of all three dimensions.
The Printable Resources for each unit contains a Coherence Flowcharts document. This document provides an overview of each chapter and includes sections labeled as Unit Anchor Phenomenon, Chapter-Level Anchor Phenomenon, and Investigative Phenomenon, along with summaries of each investigation, key concepts, and explanations that the unit is intended to address. Each statement that is labeled as a phenomenon is also accompanied by a question. In multiple cases, the sections labeled as Chapter-level or Investigative Phenomena focus on a broader science topic or concept, rather than an event students observe, ask questions about, or figure out.
The materials include an Anchor Phenomenon at the unit level. Near the start of most units, students are asked to play the role of a scientist or an engineer tasked with explaining a phenomenon or solving a problem. A phenomenon often drives learning across the unit, but does not typically drive learning and use of the three dimensions within a single lesson or chapter. Instead, a guiding question related to building understanding of the Anchor Phenomenon is presented at the start of each chapter. The lessons within the chapter build towards answering this guiding question and often focus on learning supporting concepts, rather than specifically focusing on the phenomenon or problem. Typically the Anchor Phenomenon serves as a central component of learning and can be explained through the application of targeted grade-appropriate science and engineering practices (SEPs), crosscutting concepts (CCCs), and disciplinary core ideas (DCIs), this is primarily found at the unit level and not within individual lessons or chapters (see Indicator 1i). However, multiple examples were found of chapters where phenomena or problems drive student learning and engage students with all three dimensions.
Examples of chapters where phenomena or problems do not drive student learning:
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, is not driven by a phenomenon or problem. Instead, the chapter focuses on understanding the topic of matter and energy. Students explore the rainforest and the impact of farming on the living things in the ecosystem (CCC-SYS-E2). Students use simulations to understand how matter and energy travel through the ecosystem (DCI-LS2.A-E1, DCI-LS2.B-E1). Much of the learning within the chapter is focused on general understanding of how animals gain mass, feeding relationships (DCI-LS1.C-E1), and the increase of matter (DCI-LS2.B-E1) as an organism eats. Near the end of this chapter, student learning connects to the unit phenomenon when students develop arguments (SEP-ARG-E4) about why jaguars and sloths aren't thriving. While this chapter connects to the unit phenomenon (see Indicator 1i), much of the learning within the chapter is focused on general understanding how animals obtain matter when they eat.
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 4, is not driven by a phenomenon or problem. Instead,the chapter focuses on understanding the water cycle. Students discuss their understanding of the water cycle. The concept of water conservation is introduced. Students discuss earth’s systems, specifically the hydrosphere and biosphere, and how these apply to the water cycle. Students discuss the concepts of different spheres (DCI-ESS1-E2) and use information provided in the lesson to write a scientific explanation to describe how rain forms (CCC-CE-E1, SEP-INFO-E3).
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 5, is not driven by a phenomenon or problem. Instead, the chapter focuses on understanding chemical reactions. Students collect data to determine the role chemical reactions play in wastewater treatment (SEP-INV-E3). Students also notice that a change in properties is not always evidence of a chemical reaction (DCI-PS1.B-E1, CCC-CE-E1). Students use a modeling tool (SEP-MOD-E4) to explore what happens to molecules during a chemical reaction. While this chapter connects to the unit phenomenon (see Indicator 1i), much of the learning within the chapter is focused on understanding that when a chemical reaction occurs, the properties of the substances change.
Examples of chapters where phenomena or problems drive student learning and engage students with all three dimensions:
In Grade 5, Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 2, the phenomenon that the sun can be seen at certain times of the day but not other times drives the learning. Throughout the chapter, students use a simulation to investigate how patterns can be used as evidence to support their understanding of the movement of the objects in the sky (CCC-PAT-E3) as they explore where and when they see the sun and stars. Students use the simulation to test various questions they ask (SEP-AQDP-E1) as they explore the orbit of earth around the sun and the rotation of earth on its orbit (DCI-ESS1.B-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, the phenomenon that some ingredients disappear when mixed with water and some do not, drives student learning of this lesson, but not across the chapter. Students create a digital model to represent what happens at the molecular level when a substance dissolves (SEP-MOD-E3). The model helps students explain why some items dissolve in water and some do not based on the attraction of molecules (DCI-PS1.B.E1), as well as how it is possible to understand how molecules behave even though they are too small to see (CCC-SPQ-E1).
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 3, the phenomenon is that oil and water separate after being mixed. Understanding why this happens drives learning and connects to understanding how to prevent salad dressing from separating. Students investigate properties of water and oil (SEP-INV-P4) to understand how molecules attract. They then discuss how the oil and water can mix for a short time but over time, separate back into separate substances; but when an emulsifier is added, the mixture remains a stable mixture for a longer period of time and does not separate as quickly (CCC-SC-E2). Students discuss how the properties of the mixture differ from each substance in the mixture (DCI-PS1.B.E1).
Indicator 1G
Materials are designed to include both phenomena and problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 are designed for students to solve problems in 6% (1/17) of the chapters. Throughout the materials, 76% (13/17) of the chapters focus on explaining phenomena.
The Grade 5 materials are designed as four instructional units, further organized into three to five chapters per unit. Each chapter is divided into multiple 60-minute lessons, comprising smaller activities. Each unit is structured to include 20 lessons plus two 60-minute assessment days.
The Earth System unit contains all the problems for this grade. In The Earth System unit, the problem is presented to students at the end of the chapter (chapter two). Problems are presented to students in the form of an Investigation Question that is answered through a Design Task. The task is tied back to the Anchor Phenomenon that was introduced at the beginning of the chapter.
Example of a problem in the materials:
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students are presented with a problem-statement where they are asked to design a solution for East Ferris’ water shortage. Throughout this two-session lesson, students assume the role of resource engineers and use their knowledge of evaporation and condensation to research, design, and test a freshwater collection system that can “convert saltwater into freshwater.”
The Earth System and Ecosystem Restoration units each contain an Anchoring Phenomenon, which sets the overarching tone and concept for the lessons and are found at the beginning of the instructional unit and continue throughout the instructional unit. Modeling Matter and Patterns of Earth and Sky units contain chapter-level phenomena, which set the overarching tone and concept for the lessons in that chapter and help build understanding of the unit-level phenomena.
While the materials for each unit contain sections labeled as Investigative Phenomenon, Predicted Phenomenon, and/or Everyday Phenomenon, these are typically concepts that are presented to fill in gaps of necessary student knowledge, rather than a specific event students are trying to figure out or explain.
Examples of phenomena in the materials:
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, the Anchor Phenomenon is that one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other side does not. Each chapter in the unit focuses on answering a question that will support students in explaining this phenomenon. Students make observations about the island then pose questions about why one side of the island has water and the other does not. Throughout the four chapters in this unit, students learn about the earth system and what animals need to grow and thrive to help figure out what is causing the water shortage and design possible solutions.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, the Anchor Phenomenon is that the jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees in a reforested section of a Costa Rican rain forest are not growing and thriving as well as those found in a healthier rainforests. Each chapter in the unit focuses on answering a question that will support students in explaining this phenomenon. Throughout the three chapters in this unit, students learn how organisms in an ecosystem get the matter and energy they need to survive. Students use evidence collected throughout the three chapters to construct an argument about why the living things in the rainforest ecosystem are not growing and thriving.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1: Why did the food coloring separate into different dyes?, the phenomenon is that a food coloring separates into three dyes. The chapter-level phenomenon is introduced to students in Lesson 1.4 in an email from a food-science lab. Throughout Lessons 1.4–1.6, students learn how different molecules have different properties. Students use evidence collected through a chromatography model, pasta model, fan model, and informational text to explain how food coloring can separate into three dyes.
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 4: How can we investigate why we see different stars on different nights?, the phenomenon is that we see different stars in the sky on different nights. Students use a digital simulation to design their own investigation and collect data on how different stars’ visibility changes from month-to-month throughout the year. Students use the data they collect to explain the phenomenon.
Indicator 1H
Materials intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet expectations that they intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems. The materials elicit but do not consistently leverage prior knowledge and experiences throughout the materials in a way that allows students to build from their own knowledge and experiences. Evidence for this elicitation includes:
In the Teachers’ Guide, Printable Resources, Eliciting and Leveraging Students’ Prior Knowledge, Personal Experiences, and Cultural Backgrounds, it states, “Prompts for eliciting students’ funds of knowledge. While leading discussions, the following prompts may be helpful in eliciting contributions from students:
What does… remind you of from your own life?
When have you had an experience related to…?
When have you observed something similar to…?
Can you connect… to something in your family or neighborhood?
What have you heard from your family about…?
Is there another word you would use for…?
What words do you know in another language about this topic?
Have you ever visited somewhere that reminds you of…?
Have you ever seen a TV show or read a book that’s similar to…?
Is there anything in our city/town that reminds you of…?”
These prompts provide ample and consistent opportunities for teachers to elicit prior knowledge and experience from students in their classrooms. Teachers are instructed to use What We Think We Know and Our Experiences charts to document students' knowledge and experience so they can return to them throughout the unit. However, the information students share and elicit is rarely incorporated into subsequent activities other than to reflect at the end of instruction. When incorporated into specific activities, it often misses the opportunity to position students to leverage their prior experience to make sense of the phenomenon. In some instances students' prior knowledge and experience are leveraged to support them in making sense of phenomena, but not consistently.
Examples where the materials elicit prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems, but miss the opportunity to leverage:
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.6, Activity 1, the lesson phenomenon is that the sun looks bigger and brighter than other stars. In this lesson, students are asked to think about their experiences with lights from a car that was far away but then got closer. Teachers are provided the following prompt: “Have you ever seen lights from a car that was far away but then got closer? What did you notice about how the brightness of the lights changed? What did you notice about how the size of the light changed?” Teachers are directed to adapt the headlight question prompt as necessary to meet the experiences of their students, however there is no specific guidance on how to do that. In addition, the next portion of the activity asks students to compare pictures of headlights from far away to pictures of headlights that are closer, which is an experience that they have been prompted to think about. This lesson misses the opportunity to leverage student prior knowledge and experiences.
In Grade 5, Unit: Earth Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.1, Activity 3, the unit phenomenon is that one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other side does not. In this lesson, students are asked to think about the shape of drops of different types of liquids. Students are asked to think about potential patterns that they might experience in the investigation. This lesson misses the opportunity to leverage student prior knowledge and experiences.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.3, Activity 4, the phenomenon is that jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees in a reforested section of a Costa Rican rainforest are not growing and thriving as well as those found in healthier rainforests. In this lesson, students are asked to think about their experiences with plants they have seen growing in gardens, farms, or different ecosystems and ask what those plants needed to grow and thrive? Students are directed to visualize these experiences as they write an explanation for where cecropia trees get their food molecules; however, they are using experience and knowledge from previous activities in the lesson and not their own prior experiences and knowledge. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student experience from outside the classroom.
Examples of opportunities for students to elicit and leverage their prior knowledge and experience include:
In Grade 5, Unit: Earth Systems, Chapter 5, Lesson 5.2, Activity 4, the unit phenomenon is that one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other side does not. In this lesson, students are asked to use their knowledge and experiences from outside the classroom along with what they have figured out in classroom investigations, to look at a series of images and determine whether or not there is evidence of a chemical reaction. The teacher then leads a discussion with students to identify six ways chemical reactions can be identified and students mark off examples in their notebook using their prior knowledge and class experiences. In this activity teachers leverage the students’ ability to connect patterns in their lived experience with patterns they notice in new data, to make sense of what is likely to occur.
In Grade 5, Unit: Earth Systems, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3, Activity 2, the unit phenomenon is that one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other side does not. In the lesson specifically, students are asked to consider what may happen to the groundwater levels in East Ferris as the population increases. Student prior knowledge and experience is elicited by having students consider ways that their own family uses water and how water use changes when more people visit their home. Students are asked to incorporate their experiences with personal water use habits along with ideas seen in a classroom video to develop an argument for what they think may happen to the water levels in the East Ferris reservoir under certain circumstances. Students use their lived experiences along with new information to make sense of the phenomenon.
While the materials support teachers to elicit and even help students identify how prior experiences and knowledge might be similar to what is happening in the classroom, they do not consistently provide opportunities for students to leverage that prior knowledge and experiences over subsequent activities. There are missed opportunities to bridge the gap between students’ current known experience(s), and the new, lesser-known/understood experience for the sake of building on their understanding, supporting sensemaking, and/or incorporating into their explanation of the phenomenon.
Indicator 1I
Materials embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions. The instructional materials consistently use phenomena or problems to drive student learning and to engage with all three dimensions across multiple chapters and lessons across the unit. Each chapter of the unit consists of multiple lessons and is associated with a question that focuses the chapter around a component of understanding the Anchor Phenomenon. The phenomenon or problem does not drive learning of all lessons within the chapters; many lessons are driven by a science topic or concept that builds background knowledge that can then be applied to the phenomenon or problem. However, each unit contains opportunities where the phenomenon or problem is driving learning across multiple lessons and multiple chapters. The materials consistently provide multimodal opportunities for students to develop, evaluate, and revise their thinking as students figure out phenomena or solve problems. Students have frequent opportunities to engage in multimodal learning to develop, evaluate, and revise their thinking across and/or within each unit.
Examples of unit-level phenomena that drive students’ learning and use of the three dimensions across multiple lessons.
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth Systems, the Anchor Phenomenon is that one side of Ferris Island has a water shortage and the other side does not. In Chapter 1, students are introduced to the island and are shown data about water on each side. Students share their initial thoughts and write about the island and weather patterns. Students learn about the water cycle and weather patterns through four chapters and apply this in an evidence-based argument discussing what is causing the difference between each side of the island. In Chapter 3, students look at a map to better understand how water travels in the atmosphere and where it is most common on earth (DCI-ESS2.A-E1, DCI-ESS2.C-E1). They use a simulation activity to visualize this process at the molecular level (DCI-PS1.A-E1). Students collect data from a simulation (SEP-DATA-E2) to see where condensation is most common and discuss the findings to identify patterns between temperature and elevation (CCC-PAT-E2). Students use evidence from models, simulations, and the text to explain how condensation and rain are related and use this information to future out why one side of the island has a water shortage.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, the Anchor Phenomenon is that jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees in a reforested section of a Costa Rican rainforest are not growing and thriving as well as those found in healthier rainforests. Throughout this unit, students examine a reforested section of the Costa Rican rain forest to investigate why jaguars, sloths, and cecropia trees are not thriving. Each chapter provides information about a different part of the food web to help students make sense of why these living things are not thriving in the ecosystem. In Chapter 1, students take on the role of ecologists as they study jaguars and sloths to determine why they are not thriving in the reforested section of the rainforest. Students learn about the different components of the Costa Rican ecosystem to answer why sloths and jaguars are not thriving in the environment (CCC-SYS-E2, DCI-LS2.A-E1). As they examine how matter is transferred (DCI-LS2.B-E1), students determine that a lack of trees must be the problem since jaguars eat sloths and sloths eat trees. In Chapter 2, students use a simulation (SEP-MOD-E3) to learn about the process of photosynthesis (DCI-PS3.D-E2). They learn cecropia trees must not be getting the sunlight, water molecules, or air molecules that they need to grow and thrive. Chapter 3, students learn about the soil where the cecropia trees are growing. Students engage in an investigation related to soils to determine if soil impacts plant growth. They use a simulation to learn that mushrooms are vital to soil health. Through the use of the simulation (SEP-MOD-E6), students use data to support a claim about what is affecting the health of the ecosystem (CCC-SYS-E2, DCI-LS2.B-E1).
Overview of Gateway 2
Coherence & Scope
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Gateway 2: Coherence & Scope; Criterion 1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions meets expectations.
Gateway 2
v1.5
Criterion 2.1: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions
Materials are coherent in design, scientifically accurate, and support grade-band endpoints of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for the Criterion 2a-2g: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions. The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Criterion 2a-2g: Coherence and Full Scope of the Three Dimensions. The materials support students in understanding connections between chapters and units. The materials, and corresponding suggested sequence, reveal student tasks related to explaining phenomena or solving problems that increase in sophistication within each unit and across units. The materials accurately represent the three dimensions across the series and only include scientific content appropriate to the grade level. Further, the materials include all DCI components and all elements for physical science; life science; earth and space science; and engineering, technology, and applications of science. The materials include all of the science and engineering practices but not all elements of the practices are present. The materials include all grade-level SEP elements and nearly all elements across the band, with adequate opportunity for students to use practices repeatedly and in multiple contexts. The materials include all of the grade-band crosscutting concepts and provide repeated opportunities for students to use CCCs across the grade band. The materials include NGSS connections to Nature of Science and Engineering elements associated with the SEPs and/or CCCs.
Indicator 2A
Materials are designed for students to build and connect their knowledge and use of the three dimensions across the series.
Indicator 2A.i
Students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from unit to unit.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that students understand how the materials connect the dimensions from chapter to chapter. The materials include four units comprising four to five chapters per unit. The Science Program Guide provides a recommended scope and sequence. The Unit Overview and Unit Map sections of the teacher materials provide information and support for teachers explaining how the chapters within a unit connect to each other. The Lesson Overview section of the teacher materials provides information and support for teachers that explains how the lessons within a chapter connect to each other. The first lesson of the unit (following the Pre-Unit Assessment) provides prompts that give context and goals for the entire unit. The first lesson of each subsequent chapter in the unit usually connects prior learning between the chapters in the unit. In three out of the four units in Grade 3, the final chapter connects to one or more disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) that are the focus of the unit, but not to the question presented in the Unit Map that provides context for the unit. While there are connections between chapters within each unit, there is not a connection between each unit and other units in the recommended sequence.
Examples of student learning experiences that demonstrate connections across chapters:
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, the Unit Map presents the question, “Archaeologists discovered part of an ancient artifact that depicts the sun and other stars. How can we figure out what would have appeared on the missing piece?” Across this unit, students have multiple opportunities to use models (SEP-MOD-E3, SEP-MOD-E4) and observe patterns as evidence (CCC-PAT-E3). Students explain changes in the sun, moon, and stars in the sky at different times of the day, month, and year (DCI-ESS1.B-E1) as they determine what would have appeared on the missing piece of the artifact. Each chapter addresses a different idea related to the patterns that exist across the sky. In Chapter 1, students take the role of an astronomer to figure out why it is harder to see stars in the daytime. This connects to Chapter 3 where students investigate why different stars are seen at different types of the year and to Chapter 4 where students investigate why different stars are visible on different nights. While Chapter 2 still relates to patterns in the sky, it focuses on understanding why the sun is visible during only parts of the day. Throughout all chapters, there is a consistent use of modeling and patterns to help students to understand how different objects are seen at different times within the night sky.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, the Unit Map presents the question, “What happens when two substances are mixed together?” Across this unit, students have multiple opportunities to conduct investigations (SEP-INV-E3) and use models (SEP-MOD-E3) to support explanations related to how mixing two or more different substances result in a new substance with different properties (DCI-PS1.B-E1). Students take on the role of food a scientist to solve two problems pertaining to mixtures and solubility. In Chapter 1, students use a chromatography investigation to separate food coloring to understand that matter is made up of particles too small to see. Students create digital models of the chromatography investigation to help understand what is happening at the molecular level. In Chapter 2, students investigate solubility and analyze their data. Students also create a digital model to explain what is happening at the molecular level. The models show why some items dissolve in water while others do not. In Chapter 3, students are reminded that molecules are too small to see and continue to investigate solubility and evaluate information focusing on liquids dissolving in other liquids. Students create digital models and drawings that show their understanding of particles in mixtures.
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, presents the question, “Why aren’t the jaguars and sloths in a reforested part of the Costa Rican rain forest ecosystem growing and thriving?” Across this unit, students have multiple opportunities to track how matter cycles (CCC-EM-E2) within an ecosystem and describe the different components of an ecosystem and their interactions as they figure out what is happening to the jaguars and sloths. Students collect data from various parts of a restored rainforest ecosystem to determine the reasons why animals and plants are not thriving. In Chapter 1, students use simulations to learn how organisms use food to increase their matter and grow (DCI-LS1.C-E1, DCI-LS1.C-E2). Students determine how matter impacts animals on a molecular level. Students connect the learning to how this impacts the jaguars and sloths and how these animals impact the ecosystem. In Chapter 2, students shift their focus towards the plants; specifically, why the cecropia trees aren’t growing and thriving. Students use a model to demonstrate how plants get food and grow; they also illustrate the relationships among the sun, plants, and animals within an ecosystem. In Chapter 3, students look at the soil and decomposers. Students conduct investigations to compare soil and use simulations to learn about the importance of soil health and how decomposers play a key role in the ecosystem.
Indicator 2A.ii
Materials have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they have an intentional sequence where student tasks increase in sophistication. Materials are designed with a recommended sequence and student tasks related to explaining phenomena and/or solving problems increase in sophistication within each unit and across the grade band.
Within the grade, the recommended sequence of units is Patterns of Earth and Sky, Modeling Matter, The Earth System, and Ecosystem Restoration, in that order. Within each of these units, there is a single anchor phenomenon that is presented to the students with investigative phenomenon utilized within the individual units. Although the units are provided in a recommended order, there is no specific increase of rigor as these units are presented. Approaches to the assessment of the different dimensions are also consistent and similar throughout each unit. However, the learning tasks within the unit increase in sophistication as students work towards explaining phenomena or solving problems.
Example of student tasks increasing in sophistication within a unit:
In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, students learn about a rainforest ecosystem and collect data from investigations and models to make arguments (SEP-ARG-E4) about what factors could be impacting the lives of the organisms in the ecosystem that are not thriving. Students learn about the components of good arguments and use scientific reasoning to discuss why the animals in the ecosystem are not thriving. Students collect evidence about plants through investigations and models and evaluate their own claims using evidence circles (SEP-ARG-E3). Finally, students use evidence from the entire unit to make claims supported by evidence and construct written arguments about the organisms in the ecosystem (SEP-ARG-E4). Students use their action steps to justify a restoration plan for the reforested area of the Costa Rican rainforest (SEP-ARG-E5).
In each K–5 grade level, there is one unit that emphasizes the practice of investigation, one that emphasizes the practice of modeling, and one that emphasizes the engineering practice of design. In addition, in Grades 3–5, there is also one unit that emphasizes the practice of argumentation. As students progress through the series, the materials connect learning of the three dimensions across the entire grade band. The way students engage with and use the three dimensions also increases in sophistication across the investigation, modeling, design, and argumentation units.
Examples of student tasks increasing in sophistication across grade levels:
Investigation Units: Each grade contains a unit focused on students developing the science practices related to investigations. Grade 3 and Grade 4 show continued increasing complexity and ask students to utilize practices within clearly defined investigations and topics, but Grade 5 does not show a clear increase over the previous two grades. In Grade 3, the Inheritance and Traits unit focuses on inherited traits and specifically asks “What is the origin of the traits of Wolf 44—a wolf that appears to be different from the rest of its pack?” Investigations throughout this particular unit focus on how traits are inherited. Students are investigating the process by which animals (different ones are utilized within the unit) inherit traits that are similar to and different from other animals. They use science and engineering practices (SEPs) to ask questions (SEP-ADQP-E3), investigate the phenomenon and other related information (SEP-INV-E3), and collect data on the topic to help inform their conclusions (SEP-CEDS-E1). In Grade 4, students build on their investigation skills with the Vision and Light unit, which focuses on how animals obtain information through their senses. This unit emphasizes the practice of asking of questions; students then need to investigate and collect information to answer a question (SEP-ADQP-E1, SEP-ADQP-E3) as well as use modeling to draw conclusions (SEP-MOD-E3, SEP-MOD-E4, and SEP-DATA-E2). The practices of asking questions and conducting investigations increase in complexity compared to Grade 3. The Grade 4 unit adds the use of data to the modeling process and investigation process around the phenomenon, which is an increase in the complexity from the prior investigation unit in Grade 3. Additionally, students continue to build the practice of constructing explanations and arguing from evidence. In Grade 5, the Patterns of Earth and Sky unit informs students that, “different sections of an ancient artifact show what the sky looked like from one location and depict different stars.” The phenomenon in this unit does not fully connect chapter-to-chapter, nor is there a clear unit to unit connection with prior grades. The Investigation aspects within this unit focus largely on the use of developing and using models (SEP-MOD-E3 and SEP-MOD-E4), but show no additional connections to the prior to units focused on investigations.
Argumentation Units: Each grade contains a unit focused on students developing the science practices related to investigations. Grades 3–5 show continued increasing complexity and ask students to utilize practices related to argumentation. In Grade 3, students use data to make predictions about the climate and evaluate different types of evidence (SEP-ARG-E2) in the Weather and Climate unit. Students practice organizing evidence and making claims by engaging in evidence circles (SEP-ARG-E1). Students work in groups to review evidence provided by the teacher and make claims and write an argument together about the weather on three islands. These skills are built upon in Grade 4, Earth’s Features unit, when students collect evidence from a rocky outcrop to study fossils in this area and make claims about the area’s history. To explain the fossil phenomenon, students first learn that claims must be supported by evidence (SEP-ARG-E2); then, they engage in discourse about their claims and write an argument about this area’s past (SEP-ARG-E4). As students gain more evidence about the rocky desert outcrop, they refine their arguments based on new evidence about what could have caused changes in the landscape on their own (SEP-ARG-E1, SEP-ARG-E5). In Grade 5, Ecosystem Restoration unit, students examine a rainforest ecosystem and use investigations and models to collect their own data that supports their arguments (SEP-ARG-E4) about what factors could be impacting the lives of the organisms in the ecosystem that are not thriving. Students learn about the components of good argumentation and use scientific reasoning to discuss why the animals in the ecosystem are not thriving (SEP-ARG-E3). At the end of the series, students are using their arguments, that are inclusive of claims, evidence, and reasoning to justify a plan to restore the reforested rainforest (SEP-ARG-E5).
Modeling Units: Each grade contains a unit focused on students developing the science practices related to modeling. Grades 3–5 show continued increasing complexity and ask students to utilize practices related to modeling. In Grade 3, the Balancing Forces unit introduces students to the unit phenomenon of the floating train. Students take on the role of an engineer and seek information to explain why the train floats; this requires students to explain balanced and unbalanced forces. By asking questions (SEP-ADQP-E4) across the entire unit, students explore and learn how different forces act on objects. Questions build on each other as students move throughout the unit. Students are also engaged in the use of the simulation to create models (SEP-MOD-E4). Some examples of models within the simulation have students demonstrating how a magnetic force causes the train to “float” and how balanced forces act on the train. Investigations outside of the simulation ask students to explore how gravity affects different objects pulling them towards the earth and to read about the use of a hoverboard. In addition to the use of models within these explorations, students continue to ask questions (SEP-ADQP-E4, SEP-INV-E1, SEP-INV-E3). In Grade 4, the Waves, Energy, and Information unit has students study the properties of sound waves to explain the phenomenon of sound moving through water. Students use tsunamis, stadium waves, and spring toys as models to understand wave-like motion (SEP-MOD-E4). Students use musical instruments, collision investigations, and a digital simulator (SEP-MOD-E4) to make connections between sounds and waves. By the end of the unit, students use models to manipulate waves and sounds and to make connections among waves, collisions, and sounds. Students continue to use the sound simulator to manipulate waveforms to make connections between the shape of the wave and its impact on sound (SEP-MOD-E6). To explain the phenomena, students creating and revising a model for how sound travels under water (SEP-MOD-E2). In Grade 5, the Modeling Matter unit has students use models to understand the forces among molecules (SEP-MOD-E3) and use digital simulations to make predictions about how molecules in salad dressing will behave. Students use and create models to make predictions about scientific phenomena.
Indicator 2B
Materials present Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) in a way that is scientifically accurate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they present disciplinary core ideas (DCIs), science and engineering practices (SEPs), and crosscutting concepts (CCCs) in a way that is scientifically accurate. Across the grade, the teacher materials, student materials, and assessments accurately represent the three dimensions and are free from scientific inaccuracies.
Indicator 2C
Materials do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they do not inappropriately include scientific content and ideas outside of the grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs). Across the grade, the materials consistently incorporate student learning opportunities to learn and use DCIs appropriate to the grade.
Indicator 2D
Materials incorporate all grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.
Indicator 2D.i
Physical Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meets expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for physical sciences. Across the grade, the materials include all of the associated elements of the physical science DCIs. These are found throughout all four units.
Examples of grade-level physical science DCI elements present in the materials:
PS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3: Made of Matter, students observe models of matter and review vocabulary of atoms and matter. Students participate in discussions to define atoms and molecules while discussing the need for models due to particles being too small for the human eye to see.
PS1.A-E1, In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Separating a Food-Coloring Mixture, students conduct a chromatography test to observe the molecules in food dye moving up paper. Students discuss the movement of the molecules and how they must be different substances due to the results of the lab. Teachers conclude the lesson by showing the class three types of pasta as a model of molecules and how they all differ from each other.
PS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.3: A Nanoscale View of Condensation, students focus on what happens at the nanoscale when water vapor condenses to form liquid water. Students first read a section in Water Encyclopedia about how water is made up of water molecules too small to see and how these water molecules are arranged differently in the different phases of water. Then, students use the Earth System Simulation to discover what happens to molecules when condensation occurs and raindrops form. Finally, students reflect on what they learned from reading in the reference book and investigating in the simulation as they create a model that shows raindrop formation in the Earth System Modeling Tool.
PS1.A-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving: Why do some salad dressings have sediments and others do not?, students use a digital simulation to model the behavior of molecules when substances are dissolved to observe that the amount of molecules/matter does not change.
PS1.A-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.5: Drinking Cleopatra’s Tears, students read the book, Drinking Cleopatra’s Tears to gain an understanding that earth’s water changes form and while it sometimes seems to vanish, the amount of water on earth remains constant. After reading, students synthesize these ideas with what they learned from hands-on investigations to come to a new understanding that matter can change form, but the amount of matter remains constant.
PS1.A-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 5, Lesson 5.3: Chemical Reactions at the Nanoscale, students use models to discover that the atoms that make up molecules do not appear or disappear during a chemical reaction, they simply recombine to make new molecules.
PS1.A.E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.7: Break It Down, students read a text about scientists making inferences to distinguish between mixtures. Students gain an understanding about how scientists are able to make observations and measurements to identify substances in mixtures.
PS1.A-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.8: Evaluating Chromatography Models, students review the text and the pasta model to describe the behavior of molecules and how various experiments and data collection can help identify substances.
PS1.A-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 5. Lesson 5.1: Investigating Wastewater Treatment, students are introduced to the term “properties” and investigate the properties of several substances. Students identify the properties of three substances to identify the substances.
PS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.1: Investigating Flavor Ingredients, students discuss mixtures and test the flavor of mixing various ingredients in their quest to design a salad dressing. Students observe properties of ingredients and their ability to dissolve or not.
PS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, students use a digital simulation to model what is happening at the molecular level when a substance completely dissolves and when one does not.
PS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 5, Lesson 5.1: Investigating Wastewater Treatment, students mix a combination of phenol red, calcium chloride, and baking soda. Students previously noted the physical properties of the three substances and identified that the mixture is a new substance with none of the original properties and that the mixture exhibits new properties.
PS1.B-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 5, Lesson 5.3: Chemical Reactions at the Nanoscale, students use a simulation tool to discover that the atoms that make up molecules do not appear or disappear during a chemical reaction, they simply recombine to make new molecules. No atoms are lost and none are gained and the total weight of the substance does not change.
PS2.B-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.5: How Does Up Change?, students engage in the creation of digital and kinesthetic models to demonstrate their understanding regarding the direction of up and down at various points on earth. The use of the digital modeling tool has students illustrate which way is up for people who are standing on the opposite sides of the earth. Students also observe a video and read about the effect of gravity and determine which way is "up" anywhere on planet earth. Students also connect the understanding of the direction “up” to the fact that as the earth spins, objects are pulled down with the force of gravity.
PS3.D-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 2, Lesson: 2.3: How Plants Make Food, students engage in a board game that replicates the process of photosynthesis to show how plants are dependent on the sun and produce energy.
PS3.D-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 2, Lesson: 2.1: Even Plants Need Food, students use a simulation activity to manipulate sunlight, air, soil, and water to find the components of the chemical processes that produce food and energy in plants.
Indicator 2D.ii
Life Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for life sciences. Across the grade level, the materials include all the associated elements of the life science DCIs. These are found in two out of the four units: Ecosystem Reforestation and Earth’s Systems; however, the element LS2.C.E1 is not fully addressed in the materials.
Examples of grade-level life science DCI elements present in the materials:
LS1.C-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.5: Modeling How Animals Use Food Matter, students read about alligators, specifically what they eat and how they grow. They use this information to make claims about how animals use food to grow and provide energy. Students then use an online simulation to observe how food is broken up in the body and becomes living tissue.
LS1.C-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.3: How Plants Make Food, students use a board game as a model for photosynthesis to show that air, water, and the sun help plants produce food and energy.
LS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Walk in the Woods, students read from an informational text about decomposers and apply that to what they learned about decomposers’ role in an ecosystem to the reforested rainforest.
LS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.3: Differences in Soil, students use an online simulation that allows them to manipulate soil compositions and students investigate the role of microbes and fungi in healthy soil composition.
LS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.6: The Role of Food in an Ecosystem, students use a food-web simulation to show that matter from plants becomes food for animals that helps the animals grow and thrive.
LS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.8: Arguments About Animals in the Ecosystem, students participate in evidence circles to support their claims about the relationships between sloths, jaguars, and cecropia trees. Through their discussion, they determine that there is not sufficient plant life in the reforested ecosystem.
LS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Introducing Ecosystems, students take on the role of ecologists as they work together to examine data to see how organisms meet their needs for survival in an ecosystem.
LS2.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.6: The Role of Food in the Ecosystem, students use the Ecosystem Modeling Simulation to demonstrate how organisms get food from one another and from their environment. Students use the simulation and a text to understand how animals and plants eat, grow, and release waste in an ecosystem.
Examples of grade-band life science DCI elements partially addressed in the materials:
LS2.C.E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Reforestation, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.8: Arguments About Animals in the Ecosystem, students use evidence to write arguments about the sloths and jaguars and why they may not be thriving in the reforested ecosystem. Students do not discuss organisms moving out of this ecosystem and others moving in.
Indicator 2D.iii
Earth and Space Sciences
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for earth and space sciences. Across the grade, the materials include nearly all the associated elements of the earth and space science DCIs. All of the elements are found in two out of the four units: Patterns of Earth and Sky and Earth’s Systems.
Examples of grade-level earth and space science DCI elements present in the materials:
ESS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3: How Big is Big? How Far is Far?, students read informational text that describes the relative sizes of objects and distances to those objects in space, providing information on the concept that stars range greatly in their distance from earth. Students use a visualizing strategy and connect to their own experiences regarding the size of familiar objects.
ESS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Earth and Stars in Space, students use two different models of the earth in the digital simulation to determine why other stars beyond the sun are not seen during the daytime. They determine that the sun is a star that is closer to earth so it appears larger and brighter than the other stars. In the simulation, they consider the shape of the earth and are given time to explore patterns that appear as the earth rotates.
ESS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.7: Explaining When We See Stars, students write an explanation where they explain that the sun, but not other stars, are visible in daytime because the sun is closer than other stars and therefore is brighter.
ESS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: The Daily Pattern, students use a digital simulation to observe the night sky and to examine the orbits of earth around the sun and of the moon around the earth. They learn that the rotation of earth about an axis between its north and south poles causes observable patterns. Students record observations and analyze data to understand rotation and the pattern of day and night. This includes seeing the sun during the daytime and the stars "moving" at night.
ESS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Modeling Earth’s Orbit, students obtain information from a constellation handbook and then use a model to visualize the pattern of orbit between the earth and sun. Students construct ideas of how earth's orbit and spin can affect the stars that can be seen at night due to different positions of the sun, moon, and stars at different times of the day, month, and year. Students engage in a model where the sun is at the center of the room, and each student acts as a model of earth, carrying out the motions of spinning and orbiting.
ESS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.1: Investigating the Movement of Water Vapor, students investigate a simulation model to show how wind and mountains can affect the movement of water vapor. Students investigate the effect of wind and mountains on rainfall.
ESS2.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Investigating Rainfall Distribution, students use a simulation to track water molecules and figure out why one side of a mountain can get a lot of rain while the other side gets very little rain. They then model what they discovered, demonstrating their understanding of what happens to water in the atmosphere at the nanoscale to create a rain shadow.
ESS2.C-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.1: Pre-Unit Assessment, students learn about water availability on earth through a hands-on activity with an inflatable globe and a set of graphs that show the global distribution of water. They discover that most of earth’s water is located in the oceans and there is a limited amount of freshwater available for people to use. Finally, students review the unit’s reference book, Water Encyclopedia.
ESS3.C-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Water Shortages, Water Solutions, students read Water Shortages, Water Solutions to learn more about how humans can affect the availability of freshwater.
ESS3.C-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students design and build freshwater-collection systems as a possible solution to the water shortage that will get freshwater from salt water and then collect the freshwater for people to use.
ESS3.C-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson: 1.2: Introducing Ecosystems, students take on the role of ecologists as the teacher provides an overview of the rainforest that they will be studying. Students discuss how the organisms live together in this ecosystem and use provided data to compare populations in a healthy forest to one impacted by human deforestation.
Indicator 2D.iv
Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science
The instructional materials reviewed Grades 3–5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-band and grade-level disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) for engineering, technology, and applications of science (ETS) and all associated elements. In Grade 3, no performance expectations (PEs) are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. However, the materials do include opportunities for students to engage with ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of ETS DCI elements present in the Grade 3 materials:
ETS1.A-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Planning Designs, students learn solutions to a problem may be limited by available materials and resources (constraints), and that the success of a solution is determined by how well it meets specific criteria. Students are presented with a design challenge of developing a robot that will remove invasive species. Students are given a list of criteria that the robot must do and have the constraint of a limited amount of materials to use.
ETS1.B-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Planning Designs, students learn that it is important to research a problem before beginning to design a solution, and that testing a solution involves investigating how well the design performs. Students use books and videos to research how a giraffe’s neck allows it to successfully get food and how the shape of the giraffe’s teeth allow it to grind-up its food. Students test their solutions to determine how well the teeth on their design performs.
ETS1.B.E2. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Preparing for Natural Hazards, students learn the importance of testing designs to identify failure points, then use those tests to determine where to improve their design. Students build a hurricane-proof structure to meet a set of criteria, then perform a series of tests to determine if their structures meet that criteria. Students come back together and discuss the features of each of their designs that were effective and ineffective each performance test.
ETS1.B-E3. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Planning Designs and Lesson 4.3: Making and Testing Designs, students learn that communicating with peers about proposed solutions is an important part of the design process, and shared ideas can lead to improved designs. Students communicate their design ideas before constructing their robot. In Lesson 4.3, students share their results of their tests on their design and then use the shared ideas from the class to improve their design.
In Grade 4, two PEs are associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs that also connect to an ETS DCI. The materials include opportunities for students to engage with these ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of the Grade 4 grade-level ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3: Exploring Systems, students learn that solutions to a problem may be limited by available materials and resources (constraints) and that the success of a solution is determined by how well it meets specific criteria. Students build a simple electrical system model that is powered by a solar panel using materials that are provided to them in a bag.
ETS1.C-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.4: System Improvements, students learn that testing different designs can help them determine which solves the problem. Students share data from their design tests with their classmates. Students use a listening strategy to provide input on the designs. After this, students receive a memo from the mayor asking them to consider two potential designs and recommend one.
In Grade 5, no PEs associated with physical, life, or earth and space science DCIs connect to an ETS DCI. However, the materials do include opportunities for students to engage with ETS elements in this grade.
Examples of ETS DCI elements present in the Grade 5 materials:
ETS1.A-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Design Freshwater Collection Systems, students learn that solutions to a problem may be limited by available materials and resources (constraints) and that the success of a solution is determined by how well it meets specific criteria. Students are challenged to design a system that will provide fresh water from salt water. They discuss constraints that engineers would face with this design and then are presented with constraints on the materials they can use. Students also determine that providing fresh water would be the indication of success.
ETS1.B-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.1: Investigating Dissolving: Why do some salad dressings have sediments and others do not?, students begin to design a salad dressing that must have particles dissolve. Past lessons contribute to the research that must be done before designing a solution. Testing is also done to see how the dressing performs with various ingredients.
ETS1.B-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Iterating on Freshwater Collection Systems, students discuss how testing their designs can identify failure points and this information can be used to determine what aspects of the design needs to be improved. Students measure how much freshwater their initial systems collect. Students then identify where their design failed and record which aspects of their design did not work and which aspects succeeded. Students improve their design based on the test results. This includes an explanation of why they think these successes and failures occurred.
ETS1.B-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Iterating on Freshwater Collection Systems, students learn that communicating with peers about proposed solutions is an important part of the design process, and that shared ideas can lead to improved designs. After completing their design of a freshwater collection system, students participate in an Engineer’s Jigsaw routine to see other groups’ designs and discuss their successes and failures. Students gather information from the jigsaw routine about how they can redesign their own systems. They discuss these plans in their groups and then improve their design.
The Grades 3–5 band includes three DCI PEs that are designed to be taught at any point across the grade band. These PEs include five elements. The materials provide opportunities to engage with ETS DCIs and their elements in all three grades within this band.
Examples of the 3–5 grade-band ETS DCI elements present in the materials:
ETS1.A-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Preparing for Natural Hazards, students learn that solutions to a problem may be limited by available materials and resources (constraints) and that the success of a solution is determined by how well it meets specific criteria. Students are tasked to design a structure that would be protective against the damage caused by a hurricane. Students are given a specific amount of tape, craft sticks, straws, scissors, and a single index card to build a structure to meet a set of criteria. Their structure must hold a penny above water, stay upright through wind and rain, be stable, and fit in a given container.
ETS1.B-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, lesson 4.2: Planning Designs, students learn that it is important to research a problem before beginning to design a solution and that testing a solution involves investigating how well the design performs. Students use books and videos to research how a giraffe’s neck allows it to successfully get food and how the shape of the giraffe’s teeth allow it to grind-up its food. Students test their solutions to determine how well the teeth on their design performs.
ETS1.B-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Iterating on Freshwater Collection Systems, students discuss how testing their designs can identify failure points and this information can be used to determine what aspects of the design needs to be improved. Students measure how much freshwater their initial systems collect. Students then identify where their design failed and record which aspects of their design did not work and which aspects succeeded. Students improve their design based on the test results. This includes an explanation of why they think these successes and failures occurred.
ETS1.B-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Iterating on Freshwater Collection Systems, students learn that communicating with peers about proposed solutions is an important part of the design process, and that shared ideas can lead to improved designs. After completing their design of a freshwater collection system, students participate in an Engineer’s Jigsaw routine to see other groups’ designs and discuss their successes and failures. Students gather information from the jigsaw routine about how they can redesign their own systems. They discuss these plans in their groups and then improve their design.
ETS1.C-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.4: System Improvements, students learn that testing different designs can help them determine which solves the problem. Students share data from their design tests with their classmates. Students utilize a listening strategy to provide input on the designs. After this, students receive a memo from the mayor asking them to consider two potential designs and recommend one.
Indicator 2E
Materials incorporate all grade-level Science and Engineering Practices.
Indicator 2E.i
Materials incorporate grade-level appropriate SEPs within each grade.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices (SEPs). Across the grade level, the units incorporate nearly all the grade-level elements. However, opportunities for students to fully meet the grade-band endpoint for the element SEP-MATH-E3 are missing; the materials do not require students to measure, graph, or estimate quantities related to area, volume, weight, or time to address scientific questions.
Across the grade, students are provided opportunities to engage with the SEPs multiple times and in multiple contexts. Students repeatedly engage with grade-band elements of SEPs multiple times across the units; students have multiple opportunities to conduct investigations, develop and use models, analyze data, and obtain information from text or other media to support explanations they construct about phenomena.
Examples of SEP elements associated with grade-level performance expectations present in the materials:
MOD-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns in the Earth and Sky, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.1: Observing Patterns, students engage in two different models to represent the movement of the earth and sun system. Students use a simulated model and kinesthetic model to understand that the sun is only visible for part of the day based on location; they use the sun and earth model to make predictions about whether the sun can be seen at a certain time in a specific location.
MOD-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.5: Models of Emulsifiers, students use a digital simulation and knowledge from this unit to create a nanoscale drawing that highlights the behavior of molecules in solutions. Students are able to predict how molecules will behave even though we are not able to see them.
INV-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students are introduced to a hands-on design challenge: to design and build freshwater collection systems that will get freshwater from saltwater and then collect the freshwater for people to use. Students control variables by using the same amount of hot, colored salt water. Students all have the same amount of time. The measurement technique of the resulting fresh water is identical. Students do two trials, the second one after revisions of their devices. Students reflect on what they have learned so far to help them design their systems, identifying evaporation and condensation as processes that can distill freshwater from saltwater.
INV-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 5, Lesson 5.4: Controlling Chemical Reactions, students investigate the Hot Yellow Gas (HYG) reaction again to figure out which combination of substances causes the results they observed in a previous lesson. Students test combinations of substances in the HYG reaction to figure out what makes the mixture get cold, which makes the mixture get hot, which makes the mixture turn yellow, and what forms a gas. With each test, students learn from their results to plan the next test. The lesson concludes with a discussion about what students figure out.
DATA-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Making Sense of Where Raindrops Form, students begin by predicting which areas of the atmosphere in a simulated landscape will have the most condensation. They use The Earth System Simulation to collect data on where and at what temperatures water vapor condenses in the atmosphere. They then graph their data set in The Earth System Data Tool to look for patterns, concluding that more condensation occurs high in the atmosphere because it is colder there.
ARG-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, students use evidence from a digital simulation along with observations from a lab on dissolving to support the argument that molecules exist and are moving, but are too small to see. This data also supports the argument that molecules have charges and specific arrangements that influence the solubility of substances.
INFO-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3: Matter Makes it All Up, students use information from a digital simulation model and the text, Matter Makes it All Up, to describe how animals use food to grow.
Examples of SEP elements associated with grade-level performance expectations partially present in the materials:
MATH-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Making Sense of Where Raindrops Form, students use The Earth System Simulation to collect data on where and at what temperatures water vapor condenses in the atmosphere. They record and graph temperature, atmosphere height, and number of molecules for various landscapes to show that water vapor condenses at colder higher elevations. Students then use the information from different condensation patterns on the different landscapes to future out why more water vapor gets cold over the west side of the island. While students record and graph quantities to address scientific questions, they don’t specifically use quantities related to area, volume, weight or time.
Indicator 2E.ii
Materials incorporate all SEPs across the grade band
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3–5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level science and engineering practices (SEPs) and associated elements. Across the grade band, the units fully incorporate all the SEPs and elements associated with the performance expectations (PEs) within the 3–5 grade band.
Across the grade band, students are provided opportunities to engage with the SEPs multiple times and in multiple contexts. Students repeatedly engage with grade-band elements of SEPs multiple times across the units; students have multiple opportunities to conduct investigations, develop and use models, analyze data, and obtain information from text or other media to support explanations they construct about phenomena. Many SEP elements were met multiple times across the units and grade levels.
Examples of SEP elements associated with performance expectations within the 3–5 grade band present in the materials:
AQDP-E3. In Grade 3, Unit: Balancing Forces, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.1: Discovering Non-Touching Forces, students ask questions about what causes the train to rise and how magnets are part of the train moving. Students then investigate the questions they had as they manipulate the magnets in different ways.
AQDP-E5. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Planning Designs, students define the design problem of building a robot that will remove an invasive plant species from a tree. Students develop a system, in the form of a robot, to solve their design problem. Students work within the criteria of an effective removal and the constraints of materials available for their system.
MOD-E3. In Grade 4, Unit: Earth’s Features, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.4: Modeling Erosion: Speed, students use the stream table model to construct their ideas about erosion and continue to investigate the question, “What affects the amount of rock that water can erode?” Students discuss how they could use the Erosion Model to test how the speed of water affects erosion.
MOD-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.5: Models of Emulsifiers, students use a digital simulation and knowledge from this unit to create a nanoscale drawing that highlights the behavior of molecules in solutions. Students are able to predict how molecules will behave even though we are not able to see them.
MOD-E6. In Grade 4, Unit: Waves, Energy, and Information, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.3: How Sounds Can Differ, students use a digital simulation model where they manipulate wave patterns to show that changes in wavelength and amplitude affect a sound’s volume and pitch.
INV-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.7: Designing Freshwater Collection Systems, students are introduced to a hands-on design challenge: to design and build freshwater collection systems that will get freshwater from saltwater and then collect the freshwater for people to use. Students control variables by using the same amount of hot, colored salt water. Students all have the same amount of time. The measurement technique of the resulting fresh water is identical. Students do two trials, the second one after revisions of their devices. Students reflect on what they have learned so far to help them design their systems, identifying evaporation and condensation as processes that can distill freshwater from saltwater.
INV-E3. In Grade 3, Unit: Environment and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Making and Testing Designs, students make and test their first test-versions of the neck design, share their designs and test results with another pair, and then revise their test-versions based on new ideas. Students are reminded of the procedure for neck-testing, take turns testing their giraffe-inspired necks, and record test data in their notebooks. Students share their designs and test results with another pair, and then record their new data about their designs. Students make a second test-version of the robot necks and test them.
DATA-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Making Sense of Where Raindrops Form, students begin by predicting which areas of the atmosphere in a simulated landscape will have the most condensation. They use The Earth System Simulation to collect data on where and at what temperatures water vapor condenses in the atmosphere. They then graph their data set in The Earth System Data Tool to look for patterns, concluding that more condensation occurs high in the atmosphere because it is colder there.
DATA-E2. In Grade 4, Unit: Earth’s Features, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Exploring Rock Formation and Environment, students collect data about rock samples, read about the rock types they’ve observed, and use the simulation to consider the question, “How do rocks provide information about what an environment was like in the past?” Students observe two rock samples—conglomerate and sandstone—and record their observations about how sedimentary rocks differ. Students share preliminary ideas about where the rocks may have formed.
DATA-E4. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Making and Testing Designs, students test their initial design for the RoboGrazer. Students measure and record the length of the robot neck and test how many leaves are touched within 30 seconds. Students share their data with classmates, analyzing which designs best met the criteria. Students then use that information to refine their designs.
MATH-E3. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 1, Lessons 1.2 and 1.3, students learn that data needs to be accurately recorded to recognize and predict patterns. Students perform a short experiment to determine the most effective way to measure rain data and collect temperature data. While students record and graph quantities to address scientific questions related to volume and temperature, they don’t specifically use quantities related to area, weight, or time.
MATH-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Making Sense of Where Raindrops Form, students use The Earth System Simulation to collect data on where and at what temperatures water vapor condenses in the atmosphere. They record and graph temperature, atmosphere height, and number of molecules for various landscapes to show that water vapor condenses at colder, higher elevations. Students then use the information from different condensation patterns on the different landscapes to future out why more water vapor gets cold over the west side of the island. While students record and graph quantities to address scientific questions, they don’t specifically use quantities related to area, volume, weight, or time.
CEDS-E2. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.2: Dangerous Weather Ahead, students use evidence from a text, Dangerous Weather Ahead, from a digital simulation, Weather and Climate Practice Tool, and from weather maps to construct an explanation about why natural disasters happen in some areas and not in others.
CEDS-E3. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.1: Investigating Energy Sources, students gather evidence and information to explain why the hospital lights and devices continue to work during a blackout. In this activity, students are examining evidence and asking questions about why the hospital still has electricity.
CEDS-E5. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 4, students construct circuits and make them fail. Another group analyzes the failed circuit to determine what is the failure point and provides solutions for fixing the circuit. Students then apply this understanding to the blackout problem in Ergstown and compare multiple solutions for minimizing the town’s blackouts.
ARG-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Investigating Dissolving, students use evidence from a digital simulation along with observations from a lab on dissolving to support the argument that molecules exist and are moving, but are too small to see. This data also supports the argument that molecules have charges and specific arrangements that influence the solubility of substances.
ARG-E6. In Grade 3, Unit: Environments and Survival, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.5: Presenting Design Arguments, students learn that they will participate in a Biomimicry Engineering Conference in which they will present design arguments for how their RoboGrazer designs meet the criteria. Students prepare their arguments by reviewing their test data and describing how their designs meet each of the criteria. Then the engineering conference begins, and students present their designs and design arguments and listen to others present.
INFO-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3: Matter Makes it All Up, students use information from a digital simulation model and the text, Matter Makes it All Up, to describe how animals use food to grow.
Indicator 2F
Materials incorporate all grade-band Crosscutting Concepts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3-5 meet expectations that they incorporate all grade-level crosscutting concepts (CCCs) and associated elements. Across the grade band, the units incorporate all of the elements associated with the performance expectations within the 3-5 grade band.
Across the grade band, students have multiple opportunities to engage with the grade-level CCCs that are implicitly connected to SEPs or DCIs as they build toward grade-level performance expectations. For example, students have frequent opportunities to conduct investigations or use a model to observe or test cause and effect relationships (SEP-MOD-E6), such as when they observe that mixing two substances can cause a new substance to form (DCI-PS1.B-E1). Students have multiple opportunities to use tests to gather evidence to support or refute ideas; however, opportunities to explicitly discuss this idea (CCC-CE-E1) are limited. When the materials provide opportunities to make the crosscutting concepts explicit for students, this is generally through sentence frames to help students use targeted CCCs, or through teacher prompts that provide explicit connections and guide student discussions about how scientists and engineers use different CCCs to answer scientific questions or solve engineering problems.
Examples of CCC elements associated with performance expectations within the 3-5 grade band present in the materials:
PAT-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Discovering Climate Through Data, students analyze monthly weather data organized in graphs from three different places over the course of three years. Students analyze yearly patterns and recognize that the repetitive patterns represent the climate for that area.
PAT-E2. In Grade 3, Unit: Inheritance and Traits, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Investigating Sparrow Offspring, students use the knowledge of inheritance patterns obtained throughout the unit to make predictions of the sparrow offspring that will result from designated parents.
PAT-E3. In Grade 4, Unit: Earth’s Features, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Sedimentary Rock Formation, students investigate rock samples and patterns of rock formation in the simulation to learn about how sedimentary rock forms. Students use a simulation to investigate the patterns of sedimentary rock formation. Students observe rocks forming in the simulation and record their observations about how this process happens. In doing so, students begin to make sense of the patterns that water and sediment have in a rock formation. Finally, students reflect on the information they gathered from the simulation by making a prediction of how the rock samples they observed at the beginning of the lesson may have formed.
CE-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Balancing Forces, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.1: Exploring Forces in a Chain Reaction, students watch a video about chain reactions, develop their own set of chain reactions, and explain how different forces caused each reaction. Throughout the series of reactions, students are demonstrating the relationships of the components in the series of interactions in a system. Teacher prompts focus students on what caused each object to start moving and the effect of the movement, additionally, they help students understand that scientists use cause and effect relationships to test and explain change or relationships.
CE-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Earth’s Features, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Exploring Rock Formation and Environment, students observe two samples of sedimentary rock to see what information they give about the environment in which they formed and discuss what caused the different properties of each sample to determine if they were formed in the same way. Students use the cause-and-effect relationship to explain change. SYS-E2. In Grade 3, Unit: Environment and Survival, students examine population data for two snail species where one is thriving and one is not. After reflecting on survival in snails and other organisms in particular environments, students describe the snail’s environment in terms of the different components and their interactions as they examine snail population data across different environments and with various predators. Students think about the causes of these differences and predict what would happen if another organism was introduced to the system.
SPQ-E1. In Grade 5, Unit 2: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.5: Making Sense of Solubility, students read information about molecules to understand that they exist at a small scale then use a simulation that models varying degrees of solubility to evaluate explanations of two solutions and discuss what is happening at the molecular level.
SPQ-E1. In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns in the Night Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Distances to the Stars, students investigate why stars look so small. Students use the simulation to investigate the distance from earth to the sun and to other stars. Students use the data that was collected to create a scale model of the earth, sun, and four other stars as they build understanding that natural systems can be immensely large.
SPQ-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Earth’s Features, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: students use the Earth’s Features Sim to explore how various processes on earth can occur over very long time periods.
SPQ-E2. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Future Weather on Three Islands, students perform a short experiment to determine the most effective way to measure rain data. As they measure rainfall and compare varying data with other groups, they learn that standard units are vital when communicating measurements.
SYS-E2. In Grade 4, Unit: Environment and Survival, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.2: Investigating Needs for Survival, students consider what organisms need to survive; they complete the Investigating Needs for Survival activity and investigate an organism with particular needs. Students read about four different environments (systems) and consider whether their organism can meet its needs in each of the four systems. Students start to think about the relationship between an organism and the system it is a part of.
SYS-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.1: Investigating the Movement of Water Vapor, students examine how the shape of the land and movement of water vapor within the atmosphere affects rainfall. Students consider the island’s shape, landscape, direction of wind, and compare that to other islands using the online simulation and then use the simulation program to model what factors affect how water vapor moves in the air. Students describe each component of this system and how they interact to produce the patterns of rainfall.
EM-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.5: Modeling How Animals Use Plant Matter, students use a simulation and a text about alligators to understand how animals grow from food at a molecular level. In the simulation, students track the volume of matter eaten to see that the matter that animals consume help the animals grow or becomes waste. Students begin to understand how matter moves within an ecosystem.
EM-E3. In Grade 4, Unit: Waves, Energy, and Information, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.4: Exploring Sound Waves, students are introduced to energy moving through the water as they examine the wave patterns caused by tsunamis. They learn that the water (the matter) hardly moves as energy is transferred but rather as the energy wave moves through, water moves perpendicularly, not with the wave. The students then look at how the energy from the waves causes damage as it approaches land. The waves impact land and energy is transferred to objects as the wave moves over them, causing additional energy transfer, sound, and damage. They model this by simulating a sports stadium wave and “pass” energy to one another.
Indicator 2G
Materials incorporate NGSS Connections to Nature of Science and Engineering.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 3–5 meet expectations that they incorporate NGSS connections to the nature of science (NOS) and engineering. The NOS and engineering elements are represented and attended multiple times throughout the grade-band units. They are used in correlation with the content and not used as isolated lessons. The NOS and Engineering elements are used in a variety of fashions throughout the units including videos, readings, and class discussions. Although most of the elements are present in the lessons, they are not explicitly called out in the instructional material.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with SEPs present in the materials:
VOM-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Vision and Light, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Crow Scientist, students read a text describing the investigations of a wildlife biologist. Students read about the scientist asking questions about crow behavior and then determining how to investigate the questions.
VOM-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.3: Differences in Soil, students read about an ecologist in A Walk in the Woods, and how that scientist uses various methods to collect data about soil composition and health. Students then use the ecologist's data to make claims about soil health.
BEE-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Weather and Climate, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2: Seeing the World Through Numbers, students read about organizing data to better make sense of it. In the text, Seeing the World Through Numbers, students read about a boy and his friends and how they compare temperature patterns from around the world. They then discuss how the patterns can help people make predictions about weather.
BEE-E2. In Grade 4, Unit: Waves, Energy, and Information, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Seeing Sound, students read the text, Seeing Sound, and discover the different ways that scientists use tools to visualize sounds to make sense of the world. Students discuss how tools and technologies are important for helping these professionals accurately see sound.
OTR-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Inheritance and Traits, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.1: Scorpion Scientist, students read a book called, Scorpion Scientist. The text describes a scientist gathering evidence that can be used to identify new species of scorpions. The scientist asks questions and performs investigations to seek answers on how to classify the new species and if that classification will result in changes to classification of current identified scorpions.
ENP-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Balancing Forces, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Discussing Gravity Acting Between Two Objects, students use a reading strategy related to setting a purpose for reading and complete a Gravity Anticipatory Chart to record their understanding and questions about gravity. Within the Reader, Handbook of Forces, students read about gravity and how it is a force that acts on objects without touching. Students read about how objects such as the earth exert a force called gravity that pulls you towards it.
ENP-E2. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Science You Can’t See, students read text describing how science and scientists can describe the ocean floor, atomic structure, and other natural events we can not see.
Examples of grade-band connections to NOS elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
WOK-E1. In Grade 3, Unit: Inheritance and Traits, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.1: Scorpion Scientist, students read a text that describes how a scientist asks questions and investigates to answer their questions, and how this can lead to answers. The text also describes answers leading to more questions to gain new knowledge.
HE-E2. In Grade 4, Unit: Vision and Light, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.2: Crow Scientist, students read a text where a wildlife biologist describes the team he works with to conduct investigations.
HE-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.7: Break It Down, students read text describing how scientists separate mixtures to provide water and save lives.
HE-E4. In Grade 3, Unit: Environment and Survival, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.1: Pre Unit Assessment, students read the book, Biomimicry, which is about scientists who study organisms to get ideas for solutions to design problems. The teacher leads discussion about how engineers design solutions to problems and that they use their imaginations to get design ideas from observing organisms’ traits.
Examples of grade-band connections to ENG elements associated with CCCs present in the materials:
INTER-E3. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 3, Lesson 3.4: Iterating on Freshwater Collection Systems, students discuss how the engineers in the book revised their designs for pumps using the same process that the students use to improve their freshwater reclamation models.
INTER-E4. In Grade 5, Unit: Earth’s Systems, Chapter 2: Why does more rain form over West Ferris than East Ferris?, students read text and discuss how engineers use the design process to plan, make, and test water treatment systems.
INFLU-E1. In Grade 4, Unit: Energy Conversions, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.1: Pre Unit Assessment, students discuss what happens when the power goes out in Ergstown and within the discussion, the teacher helps students make connections to the ideas that an engineers’ work is determined by people’s want and needs, and that people’s lives and interactions are influenced by the technologies that engineers develop.
INFLU-E3. In Grade 4, Unit: Waves, Energy and Information, Chapter 4, Lesson 4.3: Communicating with Codes!, after discussing the various ways that humans communicate with one another, students create a communication plan and use codes to communicate with one another. Students recognize that, although humans can be far apart, they can still communicate and interact across long distances by using new technology.
Overview of Gateway 3
Usability
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for Gateway 3: Instructional Supports & Usability; Criterion 1: Teacher Supports meets expectations. Criterion 2: Assessment meets expectations. Criterion 3: Student Supports partially meets expectations. Criterion 4: Intentional Design incorporates narrative evidence.
Gateway 3
v1.5
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for the Criterion 3a-3h: Teacher Supports. The materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for enacting the materials, contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts beyond the current grade so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series, provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies, and provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
Indicator 3A
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems.
The materials reviewed for Amplify Science Grade 5 meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in figuring out phenomena and solving problems. Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist the teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples from all units include:
The Teacher Guide, Unit Overview introduces a real-world problem, which serves as the anchor phenomenon, and its relevance to our lives. It also gives an overview of how students will build knowledge in order to solve a new problem.
The Teacher Guide, The Progress Build explains how knowledge about the phenomenon deepens as the students progress through the unit, specifically noting bolded statements.
The Teacher Guide, Getting Ready to Teach specifically details what the teacher needs to do to prepare Before You Present the Lesson, While You Present the Lesson, and After You Present the Lessons.
All Chapters, Lessons, Digital Resources, Classroom Slide|Powerpoint and the Google Slides suggest teacher talk and teacher actions.
All Chapters, Lessons, Lesson Brief, Activity, Instructional Guide, Step-by-Step provides the instructional strategy and precise teacher talk and teacher action.
All Chapters, Lessons, Lesson Brief, Activity, Instructional Guide, Teacher Support provides background information about the three dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards featured in the activity as well as the Rationale behind the teacher action and instructional suggestions.
The Teacher Guide, Unit Overview, Printable Resources, Coherence Flowcharts provide teachers with a graphic organizer for each chapter in the unit “that helps students see the connections between the phenomena and questions that drive students’ experiences, the evidence they gather, the ideas they figure out, and the new questions that those ideas generate.”
All lessons, Overview, Lesson at a Glance briefly describe student activities and suggested time allocation for each activity.
The instructional guides for each lesson from Grade 5 include suggestions about instructional strategies and guidance for presenting the content, which often includes identifying, with limited room for more targeted approaches to addressing student naive conceptions. Examples from all units include:
The Teacher Guide, Progress Build Section(s) provide prior knowledge (preconceptions) that students may bring to the lesson, foundational knowledge needed for student understanding and growth throughout the lesson, and progress build levels describing conceptual growth that students are expected to experience throughout the unit.
The Teacher Guide, Eliciting and Leveraging Student’s Prior Knowledge, Personal Experiences, and Cultural Backgrounds, supports teachers by introducing the phenomenon and consistently eliciting students' initial ideas related to the phenomenon. Also, this resource provides support for teachers to document ideas throughout the units on a class chart for ongoing reference and to help students add, revise, and reflect on their ideas.
With regard to addressing how to support students in figuring out phenomena and/or solving problems, the materials support the teacher in seeing connections between the phenomena and questioning, but miss the opportunity to clearly articulate/illustrate how the students’ understanding of the phenomenon deepens throughout. Evidence of connections between phenomena and questioning includes:
The Teacher Guide, Unit Overview, Printable Resources, Coherence Flowcharts provide teachers with a graphic organizer for each chapter in the unit “that helps students see the connections between the phenomena and questions that drive students’ experiences, the evidence they gather, the ideas they figure out, and the new questions that those ideas generate.”
Within each Activity, there is also an Instructional Guide with step-by-step guidance that is present for teachers to support their understanding of which Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs) are the focus and how to support students in using them as students figure out the phenomena or solve the problems.
All units conclude by asking students to apply the knowledge acquired throughout the unit to a new problem. Teachers are provided support via the PowerPoint slides and include suggested teacher talk to frame how engineers solve problems, in context with the ideas students learned and also teacher action to help students consider and discuss solutions.
Indicator 3B
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Amplify Science Grades 5 meet expectations for containing adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. The materials include support for teachers to develop their own understanding of grade-level concepts and content knowledge beyond the scope of the current course.
Support for teacher understanding is present across all units. The Teacher Guide section, Science Background provides adult-level science background related to the unit. This section contains expository explanations of scientific background for the three dimensions of NGSS pertaining to the unit, with grade-level appropriate student background as well as common preconceptions by both students and adults. The Teacher Guide explicitly states that the information is meant to guide the teacher in teaching the correct content, but is not meant as student-facing material.
Also in the Teacher Guide, Planning For the Unit, Digital Resource Tab, Unit Map, there is an outline of the expected student practices for each Chapter. It presents a Chapter guiding question with an explanation for the teacher regarding how the students will develop understanding through lesson activities.
The Teacher Guide, Science Background provides detailed adult-level science background regarding each unit’s science content along with a description of the extent to which this content is to be shared with students. The Science Background section includes cited references to inform teachers of the pedagogical research-based approaches to support grade-level content delivery as it is presented in the materials. In the Connections to Future Learning section of the Science Background, there is support for teacher content knowledge beyond scope of the current course. For example, in Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Planning for the Unit, Science Background, Connections to Future Learning, there are detailed paragraphs on how this content connects to learning to come in middle school as well as high school. It provides adult level explanations about the flow of energy and the cycling of matter through Earth's systems such as "In middle school, students learn that all Earth processes are the result of energy (from the sun and from Earth’s hot interior) flowing and matter cycling within and among the planet’s systems. The processes that occur within a system are limited by the supply of energy (the ability to make things move or change) and matter (anything that has mass and takes up space). For example, your body cannot function properly without an input of matter (food) and energy (via the chemical breakdown of food). Therefore, tracking fluxes of energy and matter within, into, and out of systems can be helpful in understanding the way a system is working. Looking at the interactions between energy and matter can even further elucidate natural phenomena. For example, the water cycle involves flows of matter (water) between the atmosphere and the surface and underground reservoirs of water on Earth, which are driven by energy transfers (e.g., sunlight that causes evaporation). Examining transfers and cycles of energy and matter is an important aspect of understanding any human-built or natural system."
Indicator 3C
Materials include standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards, that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Amplify Grade 5 meet expectations for including standards correlation information, including connections to college- and career-ready ELA and mathematics standards and that explain the role of the standards in the context of the overall series. The materials contain NGSS correlation information in multiple locations. All grades contain examples in the Teacher Guide:
Planning for the Unit and Standards at a Glance include a listing of the NGSS Performance Expectations (PEs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), DIsciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) addressed in the Unit.
Teacher References, 3-D Statements outline three-dimensional statements for the unit level, the chapter level, and the lesson level of each unit for all grades.
Lesson Guide, Overview, and Standards sections provide a listing of the NGSS PEs, SEPs, and CCCs that are addressed in the lesson. The Lesson Progression at the beginning of each unit shows how each NGSS standard connects to and builds upon the previous grade level.
The materials also include an explanation for the role of the NGSS standards in the context of the overall series. The Teacher Guide, Teacher Reference, Standards and Goals lists the PEs, SEPs, DCIs and CCCs that are covered in the unit. This section also provides an explanation of the core ideas across the K-8 grade span of the materials in a subsection titled “Trajectory of Core Ideas.”
The materials also provide lists of corollary Common Core ELA and mathematics standards. The Teacher’s Guide, Planning for the Unit, Standards at a Glance and Standards and Goals (under Teacher References) all list the corollary Common Core ELA (CCSS-ELA) and Common Core Math (CCSS-Math) standards addressed in each unit. Lesson Guide, Lesson Brief, and Standards include a list of the CCSS-ELA and CCSS-Math addressed in each lesson. The materials offer suggested connections with ELA and/or Math and consistently provide specific explanations regarding how the standards are aligned with the context of the lesson and/or series. For example, in Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Teacher References, Standards and Goals there are detailed paragraphs on how this content connects to the common core English Language Arts standards and the common core math standards. It provides adult-level explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/grade-band science, ELA, and mathematics that are present in the context of the series. Each CCSS-ELA and CCSS-Math standard has one to two examples of where the standard is addressed throughout the unit. An ELA example states, "Students have the opportunity to write explanatory texts to convey information about when stars are visible and why. For example, in Lesson 1.7, students write a scientific explanation to answer the question, Why don’t we see a lot of stars in the daytime? In Lesson 3.5, students write to explain how the movement of Earth affects which constellations are visible at different times of the year." A math example states, "Students have the opportunity to read and write about measurements that include decimals. In Lesson 1.4, students read and write about the distance of the sun from the Earth (0.000016 light-years). In a Going Further activity in the same lesson, they compare this decimal to other decimal distances. In Lesson 2.4, students read about weights that include decimals in the book, Which Way Is Up?"
Indicator 3D
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
The materials for Grade 5 provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, and caregivers about the program including suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement. There are examples across all units, in the Printable Resources of the Teachers’ Guide:
The NGSS Information for Parents and Guardians section, for each grade level there is an explanation of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and how the lessons within the grade level address three-dimensional learning. This document is available in English and Spanish.
The Eliciting and Leveraging Students’ Prior Knowledge, Personal Experiences, and Cultural Backgrounds sections, recommend teachers send home a Family Connections Homework assignment. This support provides questions for students to ask their families, so students are positioned to engage in class discussions about class experiences connected to the focal phenomenon.
The materials also include forms of communication for parents and caregivers, including for families that may speak and read in a language other than English.
In each grade level’s Teacher Guide, Printable Resources section, there are letters titled NGSS Information for Parents and Guardians about the NGSS that are available in both Spanish and English.
Each chapter of each unit at every grade level includes At-Home Discussion Questions. The At-Home Discussion Questions are offered in both English and Spanish.
The Amplify website has some materials available for caregivers in Spanish and English. While the site does provide some materials in both Spanish and English, it misses the opportunity to support caregivers in other languages. The Amplify website has resources for teachers to send to parents with information about the NGSS standards, unit maps, resources for back-to-school night, and Home Investigations that extend instructional units completed in school. These caregiver and family extension resources are found through a direct search on the website and miss the opportunity to be embedded in the teacher materials.
In the teacher materials, each grade level has specific examples of strategies for informing stakeholders. For example, In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, the Eliciting and Leveraging Students’ Prior Knowledge, Personal Experiences, and Cultural Backgrounds document provides direction for teachers to send home a family connection letter, Family Connections Homework. “Before the start of the unit, teachers send home with students a copy of The Earth System Family Connections Homework (copymaster found in Digital Resources for Lesson 1.1). This homework provides questions for students to discuss with family members intended to draw out family experiences and ideas related to the unit. During the class discussion to create the Our Experiences and What We Think We Know charts in Lesson 1.1, students are invited to share ideas from their family that they recorded. This is a valuable opportunity to highlight the ways that cultural and social backgrounds connect to and enhance science learning.”
Indicator 3E
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies. The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Evidence of this can be found throughout the grades, units and lessons. In each Unit Overview, Teacher References, and Standards and Goals section the materials explain an instructional approach that incorporates the strategies of Do, Talk, Read, Write, and Visualize in coordination with the NGSS crosscutting concepts (CCCs) and the disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) associated with the specific unit of instruction. These strategies are further explained in each Lesson with more explicit detail. Examples at the Grade 5 level include:
Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.2, Activity 2, SIM Figuring Out How to Do the Simulation demonstrates the “Do” approach. Students share a digital device as students explore the simulation freely before the teacher points out features important to the task. The Technological Note in the Teacher Support section for this activity states that sharing devices with a 1:2 ratio is intentional in order to promote talk between students during investigations.
Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.3, Activity 2, Teacher Guide, Lesson Brief Teacher Support demonstrates the “Read” approach. In the Literacy Note: Gradual Release of Responsibility, it states, “In this lesson, the teacher models making an inference with the first part of the text. The inference should be fairly clear to students because of their recent experiences in the classroom with dissolving. By giving this inference as an example, the teacher reminds students of the strategy of making inferences and helps them see how they can use this strategy with the text. Making inferences while reading is left deliberately open-ended; partners should talk with each other about the inferences they can make as they read the text so they can gain practice with this cognitive strategy. You may need to prompt students to pause while reading to think about each section of the book and try to draw their own conclusions.”
Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.5, Activity 2, Critical Juncture: Making Models of Mixing demonstrates the “Write” approach. Students write their evidence in a chart with scaffolds. In the first column, students need to indicate a range between one and five. In the second column, students need to circle one of four phrases that describe how mixed the two substances are, and in the third column, students write a constructed response to the question, What is your evidence?
The materials provide some explanation for the research-based strategies that are used in the design of the program. While the Program Guide, Science Program Guide, Designed for the NGSS, and Program Development sections explain the Do, Talk, Read, Write, Visualize pedagogical approach that drives Amplify Science, there is a missed opportunity to incorporate explicit citations or references in the teacher materials. Instead, the references for “Research Behind the Program'' exist on a website outside of the teacher materials.
Indicator 3F
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities. In the Teacher’s Guide, Unit Overview, Planning for the Unit, Materials and Preparation section for each unit, a thorough list of the materials needed over the course of each chapter and lesson is present. Every list includes the quantity needed to support a class of 36 students, a description of each item and in which lessons the item(s) will be used. It also contains a comprehensive list of materials that need to be provided by the teacher or school, the quantity needed, item description and the lessons requiring these materials.
In addition to the unit overview, each Lesson Brief contains a lesson-level Materials and Preparation section outlining the materials needed for the class, groups of students and/or individual students and preparations needed before the start of each lesson.
Indicator 3G
Materials provide clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for embedding clear science safety guidelines for teachers and students across the instructional materials. In the Unit Overview, Printable Resources section, an Investigation Notebook is provided for student use. Each Investigation Notebook contains a section titled, “Safety Guidelines for Science Investigations.” It is important to note that teachers should always locate and adhere to local policies and regulations related to science safety in the classroom. In each Unit Overview, Materials and Preparation, Materials at a Glance section, there is a reminder: “Note: Check and follow your district’s safety regulations pertaining to the use of proper equipment and procedures for students participating in hands-on science activities.”
Additional safety notes are located in the teacher print or digital materials within lessons which have specific safety notes for the teacher to communicate to students.
One example of an additional safety note includes:
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System Unit, Lesson 2.7, provides a specific safety note regarding the use of hot water. “Safety Notes: (1) This lesson involves the use of a small amount of hot water. Do not provide students with boiling water. Instruct students to handle the hot water carefully. (2) Remind students to be careful when getting plastic wrap from the Materials Station. The cutting edge is sharp. You may suggest they use scissors to cut the plastic wrap rather than the box edge.”
Indicator 3H
Materials designated for each grade are feasible and flexible for one school year.
The materials reviewed for Amplify Science Grade 5 include some opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content. The materials are feasible for one school year. The materials within each Unit and Lesson allow students to learn at an appropriate pace for the given grade level. In the Materials and Preparation section of the Unit Overview, it lists the preparation time required for each Lesson, with some Lessons requiring more time to prepare than others.
Examples of information related to feasibility and flexibility include:
The Program Guide, Scope & Sequence states that Grade 3 consists of four Units made up of 22 Lessons each, except for The Earth System Unit which has 26 Lessons. In each Unit, two days are allocated for the full session, Pre-Unit Assessment, and End-of-Unit Assessment. Each Lesson for Grade 5 takes approximately 60 minutes “though teachers can expand or contract the timing to meet their needs.” The Program Structure K-5 Trifold provides the same information as the Program Guide.
In each Unit, the Teacher Guide, Teacher References, and Lesson Overview & Compilation summarize Lessons and provide suggested time allocations for each Lesson. This information is also found in the Lesson Brief and Step-by-step for each Lesson. For example, Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.1, Student Write Initial Explanations states, “Students are introduced to a pre-unit assessment writing task in order to record their initial thoughts about the content in the unit (20 min).”
In each Lesson, the Lesson Overview and Lesson at a Glance list the Activities for the Lesson and the time allocated. For example, Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.1 Overview, Lesson at a Glance lists four Activities with times allocated ranging from 5 to 30 minutes for a total of 60 minutes.
According to an Amplify Q&A article on the Amplify Help Site, All collections, Amplify Science, Amplify Science K-8 Resources, Amplify Science Pacing Guidance, “Because science is implemented in such varied ways across districts, we do not offer a specific pacing guide. However, the lesson information below will help you determine the best way to fit the program into the structure of your district’s instructional calendar.”
Lessons for each Unit provide a summary of suggested time frames for each lesson activity. This information is provided within the Lesson Guide for each Lesson. Adaptations for materials or guidance for a range of district constraints due to time and or scheduling differences are not directly available in the materials.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for the Criterion 3i-3l: Assessment. The materials indicate which standards are assessed and include an assessment system that provides multiple opportunities throughout the courses to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance for teachers to interpret student performance and suggestions for follow-up. The materials also provide assessments that include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of course-level standards and practices.
Indicator 3I
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The assessment materials for Grade 5 are comprehensively designed and aligned within the Units. It is clear for teachers where the assessments are, the type of assessments that are provided, and to what standard(s) each assessment opportunity is intended to be aligned. For instance, in the Grade 5 Teacher’s Guides, any unit, Teacher References, Assessment System, each assessment opportunity throughout the Unit is listed in a chart in relation to the Lesson, type of assessment, and NGSS standard intended to be assessed. In addition, in the Teacher Guide for every Grade 5 Unit, under Printable Resources, there is a document titled 3-D Assessment Objectives This document contains the 3-D Statements and accompanying objectives, their pertinence in the unit, and the type of assessment aligned to that objective. “Each table includes the Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) included in that Performance Expectation and specifies the location of assessments associated with these three dimensions.”
The materials provide information detailing how assessments build toward the standards for the grade level or band. In the Teacher Guide of each Unit, Teacher Reference, Assessment System, Monitoring Progress section, there is a discussion of Critical Juncture Assessments with an outline of each Critical Juncture concept and assessment in each Unit. The Critical Juncture assessments provide the teacher with specific three-dimensional statements to assess before moving forward in the Lessons. Lessons that provide Critical Junctures or On-the-Fly Assessments also provide an Assessment Guide or a Hands-On Flextension Lesson Guide in the Lesson Brief, Overview, Digital Resources section which states the DCI, SEP, and CCC.
In addition to listing intended standards alignment in the Teacher Guide of all Units, Teacher References, Assessment System, and the Formative and Summative Assessment Opportunities sections list the DCI, SEP, and the CCC addressed in each assessment. These also include strikethroughs of the portion of the standard that is not assessed in the Unit. While strikethroughs indicate which portion of the standard is not being assessed, there is a missed opportunity to state how the assessments contribute to building toward the end of grade-level performance expectations.
Indicator 3J
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing an assessment system with multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning, sufficient guidance for teachers to help them interpret student performance, and suggestions for following-up with students.
Examples include:
In each Unit, the Assessment Guide for the End-of-Unit Assessment provides three rubrics, one each for the DCI, SEP, and CCC as well as questions to support teachers in determining students’ initial understanding of the standards identified for each assessment. For example, Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 3.7, Assessment Guide: Assessing Students’ End-of-Unit Explanations About Emulsifiers in Salad Dressing states students are at a level two for performance of the practices of constructing explanations and obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information if “The writing goes beyond describing the observable interactions of the ingredients to propose: why the oil and vinegar initially separated but the addition of the lecithin resulted in mixing and why different molecules interact in different ways.” For the disciplinary core idea, students may earn up to three points if they show, “understanding that substances are made of particles that are too small to be seen,” “understanding that the particles that make up materials have properties that explain why ingredients sometimes mix,” and “understanding that the particles that make up materials have properties that explain why ingredients sometimes separate.” Sample evidence is provided for each of these criteria. Students may earn up to two points for the crosscutting concept scale, proportion, and quantity if they, “recognize that objects can exist at the observable scale and also at a scale that is too small to be observed with the naked eye,” and “account for the observable separation or mixing of ingredients by describing interactions of particles that are too small to be observed with the naked eye.”
Further, the Assessment Guide for the End-of-Unit Assessment rubrics include suggestions for Follow-Up. For example, in Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, End-Of-Unit Assessment Guide found in the Digital Resources for the lessons with End-of-Unit Assessments and Investigation Assessments there is detailed information that "shows specific suggestions for follow-up with students who need additional support based on the results of the assessment." There are follow up activities suggested for each rubric. Each rubric addresses the SEPs, DCIs, and CCCs that were assessed. The rubric provides follow-up questions for the teacher to ask the students, such as "If the argument doesn’t propose a claim that directly answers the question: Ask, “What are the possible reasons the snakes aren’t growing and thriving? Which reason do you think best explains why they aren’t growing and thriving?”" If the student is still struggling, the rubric provides a specific lesson and activity for them to review such as, "review with them the resources for writing scientific arguments in Lesson 1.8, Activity 3."
The Embedded Formative Assessments, The Critical Juncture, and On-the-Fly Assessments, provide guidance on what to look for and how to tailor instruction if students do not demonstrate understanding. For example, Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Unit Overview, Teacher References, Embedded Formative Assessments, Lesson 1.7, Activity 3 Tailor Instruction recommends, “If students do not demonstrate understanding that the stars are in all directions around Earth and the sun is the closest star, have them read pages 12, and 19–21 in How Big Is Big? How Far Is Far?” Another example is found in Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.10, Activity 2, Critical Juncture Assessment 1b, Hummingbird Icon which suggests teachers tailor instruction if students are not demonstrating understanding on this Critical Juncture Assessment. Teachers provide examples of explanations that use evidence effectively and direct students to return to the Modeling Matter Diagramming Tool to reconstruct a model of chromatography, talking through what their model shows and revising their explanation to ensure the models and explanations support each other. Also, in Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.3, Activity 3, On the Fly Assessment, Hummingbird Icon suggests teachers look for students to use evidence to put items in order for smallest to largest. Students who identify atoms, molecules, and a drop of water in the incorrect order are directed to revisit a caption for clarification. Teachers may also print out and cut apart images for students to use as manipulatives in clarifying their thinking.
In each Unit, Unit Overview, Teacher References, the Embedded Formative Assessments detail the targeted learning objectives and how students will demonstrate the targeted standards under the heading Look Fors as well as the next steps teachers should take when students do not demonstrate understanding under the heading Now What? For example, in Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Lesson 1.6, Activity 2, On-the-Fly Assessment 3: Explaining the Size and Brightness of the Sun, Now What? recommends, “If students do not understand that stars other than the sun appear small because they are so far from Earth, have them refer back to the distance table in How Big Is Big? How Far Is Far? Also ask them to compare the distances using their own data from the Sim. Help students understand the relative distances of the sun and other stars by drawing a simple diagram on the board to show how much further the stars are from Earth as compared to the distance between the sun and Earth.”
Indicator 3K
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/grade-band standards and elements across the series.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing assessment opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level standards and elements across the series. The assessment system consistently incorporates the three dimensions. The assessment system also provides a variety of assessment types, but constructed response is the predominant modality. The Pre-Assessment, On-the-fly, Critical Juncture, and End-of-unit assessments require written responses. They assess the DCIs CCCs, and SEPs. There is a missed opportunity for students to demonstrate all of the SEPs, but there is a consistent focus on the practices of constructing explanations, argumentation, and modeling. Both versions (A and B) of the summative assessment ask students to provide written explanations. Version B provides students with sentence starters. Examples of assessments in this grade can be found in the reports for Indicators 1b and 1c.
In addition to summative assessments, Conversation rubrics found throughout the resources offer prompts, look fors, and/or suggestions for how to evaluate students but most focus on a singular dimension. There are rubrics that provide questions to develop understanding of students’ ability to demonstrate each dimension. The rubrics provide partial scores for partial student answers.
Indicator 3L
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The materials for Grade 5 include some assessments that offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. The materials offer some general suggestions to help students demonstrate their knowledge such as allowing more time for writing. Most support is provided for formative assessments as they are embedded within the instructional process. However, the materials miss the opportunity to provide specific examples for access or accommodation as it pertains to summative assessments for disabled students or multilingual learners beyond suggesting that teachers think about how to accommodate students who need more support.
In the Materials Overview of each Lesson, a section regarding differentiation provides embedded support for diverse learners, potential challenges in the Lesson, specific differentiation strategies for multilingual learners, and specific strategies for students who need more support and who may experience more challenges. This information is provided at the Lesson level but is applicable to the formative assessments as these assessments are embedded within the lesson structure. To the extent that instruction is supported with accommodation suggestions, most lessons have suggestions for differentiation that rely on the teacher to “make a plan” for special accommodations but do not provide specific guidance to support the teacher. For example, in Grade 5, Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 2.7, Differentiation, teachers are told to provide students with additional time or another accommodation as they plan for specific students before administering the assessment. They are also told they may consider offering additional time during the next day’s lesson or to have instructional aides read prompts to students but there is no guidance on accommodations that would be appropriate while still providing grade-level access to the assessment itself.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet expectations for the Criterion 3m-3v: Student Supports. The materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level science. The materials also provide multiple extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage with grade-level science at higher levels of complexity. While suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3M
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing strategies and support for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering. The strategies, supports, and resources to support students in regular and active participation and engagement include sentence starters or frames for discussions, revisiting the text, strategically pairing students, allowing adequate time, and utilizing graphic organizers.
Examples include:
Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.3, Differentiation Brief recommends teachers strategically pair stronger readers with students who may need additional reading supports.
Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 3.1, Differentiation Brief provides sentence starters. Students use sentence starters as a framework to share ideas during small and whole group discussions. Examples of sentence frames include, “When we ___, I observed ____.” as well as, “I think it might be because _____.”
Grade 5, Access and Equity, Differentiation Strategies, Students with Disabilities section of the Program Guide states that detailed suggestions for students with disabilities can be found within each lesson and assessment task. Some examples are strategic grouping to create “positive and supportive student partnerships” that are important to developing a class culture where students feel comfortable in sharing ideas, and utilizing graphic organizers which are provided within lessons to guide student thinking. Another strategy suggested is that teachers provide students with adequate time to discuss and compose their ideas with partners or small groups before a writing task.
Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Lesson 1.3, Differentiation Brief suggests providing reading support by implementing Partner Reading time and checking in on the students by asking them to rephrase, in their own words, what they have read. Teachers can also meet with a small group while the rest of the class reads independently, or guiding the lesson in such a way that partners pause after reading a section and discussing the text or making inferences as a class.
The materials miss the opportunity to draw a clear connection between specific strategies and supports for “students who need more support” and any below grade-level knowledge or skills.
Indicator 3N
Materials provide extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering at greater depth.
The materials for Grade 5 meet expectations for providing extensions and/or opportunities for students to engage in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering at greater depth. Materials provide multiple opportunities for advanced students to engage in grade-level/grade-band science at a higher level of complexity. In multiple instances, the program differentiates for students who need more challenge. For example, in Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.2, in the Differentiation Section there is a strategy for students who need more challenge. The teacher is given a suggestion for having students make another model with a different substance for comparison, "In this lesson, all students are challenged to come up with a generic model of a solid dissolving in a liquid. Provide more challenge by having students make a model of citric acid dissolving in water versus sugar dissolving in water."
Additionally, in the digital platform, the Programs and Apps icon, Other Resources, Science Program Hub, Additional Unit Materials, any grade, any unit, Unit Extensions; teachers are provided a list of recommended extension activities such as field trips, integrating STEAM activities, incorporating forms of art, and conducting a research project in a group that can be offered to all students. Each document contains a statement similar to: “The experiences above can support the Disciplinary Ideas addressed in this unit, as well as practices such as Designing Solutions and crosscutting concepts such as Structure and Function.” These extension activities are activities that all students can benefit from. The extension activities are optional, but do present extra work for students who are asked to complete them. For Instance, in Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Lesson 2.6, Lesson Overview, Differentiation: Students who need more of a challenge are directed to create a presentation to build on their scientific explanations from their writing.
Indicator 3O
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
The materials for Grade 5 include varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning. Lessons are supported with a Google Slide or Powerpoint Presentation rich with images and questions to guide the Teacher Led discussions. Teacher Led discussions introduce the investigative question. The materials state, “Through this routine, students explicitly apply their ideas and experiences to new situations and investigations.” As Lessons progress, students deepen their knowledge as they compile information through collaborative activities including partner reading, hands-on investigations, analyzing data or models in pairs, shared writing of scientific explanations, and Think-Write-Pair-Share. Examples of varied approaches to learning tasks include:
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Lesson 2.6, Activity 1 demonstrates a Roundtable Discussion. In step three of the activity the teacher introduces the roundtable discussion routine. Students refer to page 31 of their investigation notebook to review the instructions as the teacher goes over them aloud. Students work in groups of four and have specific discussion questions they will ask during the discussion. Once the discussion concludes, groups report to the rest of the class what they discussed in their session.
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Lesson 5.1, Activity 3 demonstrates a hands-on activity where students mix substances in order to see a chemical reaction. At the end of the activity students record their observations and answer the questions in their investigation notebook. The next activity is a whole group, teacher-led discussion of the observations the students had.
Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth & Sky demonstrates learning by demonstrating changes in thinking over time. The Student Notebook says that students are encouraged to keep track of what they observe and to record their ideas as the unit progresses. This serves as a record of students’ thinking as their ideas change over the course of the unit.
Resources provide information about regular opportunities for students to assess their own learning. One specific example is in the Unit: Spinning Earth, Teacher Guide, Teacher References, Assessment System, Student Self-Assessments, describes the role of student self-assessments and an example from the Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Teacher Guide, Teacher References, Assessment System, Student Self-Assessments, describes the role of student self-assessments and an example from the unit, “At the end of each chapter, students are invited to check their progress toward understanding why the organisms aren’t growing and thriving, using the following prompts:
I understand how matter from cecropia trees becomes matter in jaguars.
I understand what cecropia trees in the project area need in order to get more body matter.
I understand what affects the health of all the organisms in the project area.
I understand how cecropia trees, decomposers, sloths, and jaguars in the project area use food molecules.
I understand that scientific explanations can change based on new evidence.
This quick yet important activity asks students to reflect on whether they understand or don’t yet understand about the core concepts from the unit.”
Additionally, the Student Notebook resource indicates that student self-assessments are optional, however, this is not indicated in the Teacher Guide.
Indicator 3P
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
The materials for Grade 5 include limited opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies and limited guidance for grouping students. The different groupings promote interaction, engagement, and learning. Teacher guidance on how and when to use groupings is provided; however, there is a missed opportunity to provide suggestions on how to form the different groupings strategically. In all units, pairs of students engage in Partner Reading, exploring simulations on digital devices, and the Think-Write-Pair-Share routine. During hands-on investigations, students may be encouraged to work in groups of four. Examples of teacher guidance on how and when to use a variety of grouping strategies to increase interaction, engagement, and learning include:
Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of the Earth & Sky, Lesson 1.2, Activity 4 demonstrates how students engage in a Think-Write-Pair-Share routine where they have a chance to think about their ideas, write them down, share their ideas with a partner, and then with the whole class. Thereafter, students have the option to share an idea from their partner with the whole class.
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.2, Activity 2 demonstrates how students work in groups of four to set up terrariums. The Step-by-Step 4 directs the teachers to describe the role for each group member, “Soil Monitor, Grass Seed Monitor, Alfalfa Seed Monitor, and Moisture Monitor.” The Teacher Support provides an Instructional Suggestion, “Classroom Management: Group WorkThis unit requires that students do a great deal of group work. You may wish to review your classroom expectations for group work. For example, taking turns, sharing materials, listening to one another’s ideas, encouraging all members to participate, using kind voices, staying on task, etc. If your students do not have much experience working in groups, you may want to establish some guidelines for group work and have a few students role-play, following the guidelines, as a way to model the expectations for other students.
Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of the Earth & Sky, Lesson Slideshows contain suggested talk moves for teachers to support partner sharing and whole class discussions.
Indicator 3Q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
The materials for Grade 5 partially meet expectations for strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering. Throughout the units there are visual representations and language supports that can assist with anticipating and addressing potential language demands as well as supporting student agency. Examples include:
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.3, Differentiation Brief, Specific Differentiation Strategies for English Learners, teachers are directed to partner multilingual learners strategically such that they can engage in conversations about the reading slightly above their own language proficiency to accelerate second-language learning and increase confidence in scientific discourse.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.10, Differentiation Brief, Specific Differentiation Strategies for English Learners, the materials provide a list of words that may be useful to multilingual learners, in addition to posted vocabulary, when expressing their ideas, alleviating the need for students to focus on spelling those words and to focus on expressing their understanding.
The materials also include instances of language support to address the role of misconception in content versus language demands and grouping strategies to support multilingual learners. Examples include:
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.9, Differentiation Brief, Specific Differentiation Strategies for English Learners, teachers are directed to provide students with options in their response, suggesting that multilingual learners may have more success in expressing their ideas/understanding through drawing and/or orally rather than through written explanations.
In Grade 5 Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.9, Differentiation Brief, Specific Differentiation Strategies for English Learners, teachers are directed to provide students with options in their response, suggesting that multilingual learners may have more success in expressing their ideas/understanding through drawing and/or orally rather than through written explanations.
There are also examples of general accommodations for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English, such as additional wait time, practice, and sentence stems. Examples of these accommodations include:
In all units, Program Guide, Access and Equity, Differentiation, English Learner suggests increasing wait time. The guide indicates that multilingual learners often need more time to process their oral responses to questions posed by the teacher. This is due to multilingual learners needing to make sense of unfamiliar words or phrases and mentally translate the question in their native language before formulating a response. The guide specifically states to increase wait time to 10 seconds before calling on students to increase participation from multilingual learners in class discussions.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 1.2, Activity 3, Lesson Guide, students engage in a shared listening routine where one student shares for one minute while the other student listens. This student then restates the first student’s ideas. The first student may correct any misstatements, but may not add new information. Students then switch roles for a second question. Under Teacher Supports, materials advise teachers of this strategy's benefits to multilingual learners who are able to hear a model of language usage from their peers before sharing their own ideas.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson 2.3, Differentiation Brief, Specific Differentiation Strategies for English Learners, teachers are directed to partner multilingual learners strategically such that they can engage in conversations about the reading slightly above their own language proficiency to accelerate second-language learning and increase confidence in scientific discourse.
There is also a Multilingual Glossary that provides definitions and translations for key Unit vocabulary for each Unit in ten languages (Arabic, Chinese, French, Haitian Creole, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, and Vietnamese).
Also, there are general supports for students who are performing at grade level, but nothing beyond grade level for those students who may exceed grade-level understanding of content, but who may have limited English proficiency. There are also missed opportunities to provide specific supports for multilingual learners at differing levels of English language proficiency. As a result, while suggestions for multilingual learners appear consistently across lessons, they do not consistently provide the support necessary for multilingual learners to regularly participate in learning grade-level/grade-band science and engineering.
Indicator 3R
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
The materials reviewed for Amplify Science Grade 5 include a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics. The materials provide examples of various demographic and physical characteristics in the books and slideshows. The images show students engaging in and able to do the work related to the context of the learning. Depictions of people in the materials and books represent many different characteristics.
Examples include:
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Lesson 2.8, Activity 2, Teacher Support, Rationale for Pedagogical Goals: Understanding the Nature of Science, explains that “This unit gives students the opportunity to experience the understanding that ‘Science Is a Human Endeavor.’ In this lesson, Engineering Clean Water illustrates the idea that most scientists and engineers work in teams, composed of men and women from all cultures and backgrounds. The international collaboration between Yoshika, Anjerul, and the other scientists who worked to solve Dhaka’s water problem exemplifies this.”
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Book: Why Do Scientists Argue? Is a book about a female ecologist. It also shows images of scientists of different genders and with different physical characteristics.
Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of the Earth and Sky, Book: Dog Days of Summer explains the historical importance of stars to different cultures with regards to agricultural and religious ceremonies, including the Zuni and Egyptians.
Grade 5 Unit: Modeling Matter, Book: Food Scientist’s Handbook, mages in the book depict scientists of different genders and with different physical characteristics.
Indicator 3S
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
The materials for Grade 5 provide some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. This is evidenced in the teacher-facing guidance documents, specifically the Teacher Guide section that includes a section titled Differentiation of English Learners. A specific strategy that is identified in some lessons across all Grades 3-5 is the use of Spanish cognates. Teachers are encouraged to show Spanish cognates for certain science terms discussed in lessons to support English learners in developing meaning. Students are provided language support in their Investigation Notebooks in the form of bilingual and multilingual glossaries. The materials guide teachers to use the student’s preferred language and previous exposure to everyday and academic English strategically in instruction. However, there is a missed opportunity to provide guidance to teachers with strategies for using home languages, other than English or Spanish, to facilitate learning.
Examples of using home language to facilitate learning include:
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Unit Overview, Printable Materials, Investigation Notebook The glossary at the end of the notebook provides the vocabulary term in English (word and definition) and directly below the term is the term and definition in Spanish. In Grade 5, Unit Overview, Printable Materials, Investigation Notebook The glossary at the end of the notebook provides the vocabulary term in English (word + definition) and directly below the term is the term and definition in Spanish.
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.7, Differentiation Brief, Embedded Supports for Diverse Learners presents how to use everyday and academic English strategically in instruction. Teachers refer to the Science/Everyday Words chart to show how scientific words are related to words in everyday use that may be familiar to students. This helps students develop their academic language skills.
Indicator 3T
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
The materials for Grade 5 provide some guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning. For instance, in every unit in Grade 5, the Teacher Guide, Printable Resources, Eliciting and Leveraging Students’ Prior Knowledge, Personal Experiences, and Cultural Backgrounds, there is an explanation for teachers for why eliciting and building upon student prior knowledge, personal experiences, and cultural and social backgrounds is important to the learning process. Teachers are encouraged to collect student ideas on “What We Think We Know Charts” and to return and connect student prior experience to what they are learning multiple times per chapter. Every chapter of every unit contains this guidance which includes the following:
“Prompts for eliciting students’ funds of knowledge. While leading discussions, the following prompts may be helpful in eliciting contributions from students:
What does… remind you of from your own life?
When have you had an experience related to…?
When have you observed something similar to…?
Can you connect… to something in your family or neighborhood?
What have you heard from your family about…?
Is there another word you would use for…?
What words do you know in another language about this topic?
Have you ever visited somewhere that reminds you of…?
Have you ever seen a TV show or read a book that’s similar to…?
Is there anything in our city/town that reminds you of…?
There are example student responses and suggested actions for teachers based upon these prompts.
Indicator 3U
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
The materials for Grade 5 provide consistent general literacy supports for students; however, they miss the opportunity to provide information and/or supports for students at varied reading levels.
The materials provide multiple entry points to help struggling readers to access and engage in grade-level science. Examples include:
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.3, Partner Read Guidelines and Differentiation Brief suggests partner reading. Students follow partner reading guidelines including, taking turns reading, being respectful and polite to their partner, and working together to make sure both partners understand what they have read. Teachers may choose to partner students with the same partner for each partner read or vary partners based on student needs.
Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Lesson 2.8, Lesson Overview, Differentiation suggests that students might work in small groups and have students focus on a section of the book because the materials mention that reading informational texts can be challenging for many students. The materials suggest considering whether students would benefit from additional support within the lesson.
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.3 suggests students complete an optional anticipation guide to access their prior knowledge about the reading, Matter Makes it All Up. Students work with a partner prior to the reading to read statements and select whether they agree or disagree with each statement. Students revisit these statements after the reading and make changes to their responses based on evidence from the reading.
Grade 5, Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.3, Activity 2 Teacher Supports, Literacy Note makes a recommendation that after completing the partner read, students complete a shared class reading where teachers pause to discuss the reading, pose questions, and assist students in making sense of challenging vocabulary.
Indicator 3V
This is not an assessed indicator in Science.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology (when applicable) with guidance for teachers.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 5 have narrative evidence for Criterion 3w-3z: Intentional Design. The materials integrate technology such as interactive tools and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in grade-band learning; the materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology, when applicable, to support and enhance student learning. The materials have a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic. The materials do not include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, as much of the collaboration is designed for in-person engagement.
Indicator 3W
Materials integrate interactive tools and/or dynamic software in ways that support student engagement in the three dimensions, when applicable.
The materials for Grade 5 integrate interactive tools in ways that support student engagement in the three dimensions. In the Program Structure and Components Trifold, Program Components, Slide 5, Amplify’s digital tools overview indicates that Grades K-1 include the digital teacher’s guide and videos, while Grades 2-3 also include student practice apps and Grades 4-5 include all resources including practice apps and simulation tools.
Examples include:
In Grade 5, Unit: The Earth System, Programs & Apps icon, Tools, Elementary Student Apps, Weather and Climate, a digital practice tool is available to students in five lessons in this unit. The practice tools in this unit include modeling and data tools and they are intended to assist students in deepening their understanding of evaporation, condensation, rain shadows, and chemical reactions. Students use data from the simulation activity to interpret condensation data and recognize the connection between lower temperatures and increased condensation rates.
In Grade 5, Unit: Patterns of Earth and Sky, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.5, Activity 2, students are directed to the Student Apps Page to use the Patterns of Earth and Sky simulation to investigate patterns in star positions throughout the day and night.
In Grade 5, Unit: Modeling Matter, Chapter 2, Lesson 2.2, Activity 3, students are directed to the Student Apps Page to use an interactive simulation to investigate the behavior of different molecules when they interact.
Indicator 3X
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
The materials for Grade 5 include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for students to collaborate with each other in some instances. In all cases students are focused on learning how to use the technology in collaboration with other students in a face-to-face format.
Indicator 3Y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
The materials for Grade 5 include a visual design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject. The materials are neither distracting nor chaotic. Teacher materials are arranged uniformly throughout the grade levels, each unit beginning with an overview, then providing chapters of each unit with chapter sections in a labeled grid format (e.g. 5.1, 5.2, 5.3). Section grids are followed by resources for the teacher and are organized similarly for all Units.
Resources are organized in the following order:
MENU TAB: Printable Resources;
MENU TAB: Planning for the Unit; Unit Map, Progress Build, Getting Ready to Teach, Materials and Preparation, Science Background and Standards at a Glance;
MENU TAB: Teacher References; Lesson Overview Compilation, Standards and Goals, 3-D Statements, Assessment System, Embedded Formative Assessments, Books in This Unit;
MENU TAB: Offline Preparation.
Materials are predictably accessible throughout each unit as the format remains consistent from unit-to-unit, grade-to-grade.
Student materials are similarly consistent. Each unit includes a Student Investigation Notebook that provides documents from the chapters in the corresponding unit. There is a table of contents and consistent and repeated Safety Guidelines for students in each investigation notebook followed by the pages for each chapter. Each notebook contains a glossary and provides the students ample room to write and/or type responses/observations.
Student readers are presented digitally and easy to manipulate for students online, or for classroom presentation using a digital screen. The books are colorful and contain appropriate illustrations and utilize easy to read font (format and sizing).
Indicator 3Z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable. As a broad approach to providing guidance, every Lesson of every Unit in Grade 5 contains a Lesson Brief, Materials and Preparation, and Before the Day of the Lesson section that tells teachers which digital resources should be used and how to prepare them for each Lesson.
In addition to general preparation guidance, examples of teacher guidance for technology use in Grade 5 can be found within Lesson Briefs such as in Unit: Ecosystem Restoration, Lesson 1.1, Lesson Brief, Exploring the Simulation which states, “7. Discuss how the Sim works. As students share something they figured out about how the Sim works, project the Sim and demonstrate what each responding student tells you to do. What did you figure out about how the Sim works?
Point out the following features if students don’t bring them up in the discussion:
Living things can be removed or added to the ecosystem by pressing them and selecting YES or NO to turn them on or off.
The sun, carbon dioxide, and water can each be removed separately. (Note: To remove water, you can press on any area within the soil.)
The speed of the Sim can be adjusted by selecting 0.5x, 1x, or 2x at the top right of the screen.
The Sim can be paused/unpaused to spend more time looking at something of interest.
8. Consider students’ questions. What did the Sim exploration make you wonder about?”
Similar guidance can be found in the Unit: Modeling Matter, Lesson Brief, Lesson 2.2, Activities 2,3 and 4, Investigating Dissolving simulations and the Unit: Investigating Size and Distance, Lesson Brief, Lesson 1.5, Activity 2, Investigating Stars in Daytime and Nighttime.