Compare Specific Materials

Clear All Filters

Update How Results Are Shown

Amplify ELA (2016)

Published By: Amplify

| Date Published: 2016/08/01

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34

Amplify ELA (2019)

Published By: Amplify

| Date Published: 2020/06/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34

ARC (American Reading Company) Core (2017)

Published By: American Reading Company

| Date Published: 2018/09/17

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
37/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
37/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
38/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
30/34

Benchmark Advance (2018)

Published By: Benchmark Education Company

| Date Published: 2018/03/16

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
37/42
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
37/42
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
38/42
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
28/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
31/34

Benchmark Advance (2021)

Published By: Benchmark Education Company

| Date Published: 2020/10/29

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
38/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
38/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
38/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/36
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A

Bookworms (2017)

Published By: Comprehensive Reading Solutions

| Date Published: 2017/04/09

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
36/42
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
37/42
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
37/42
20/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
36/42
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
20/32
Usability
N/A

Bookworms (2018)

Published By: Open Up Resources

| Date Published: 2019/07/25

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
40/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
40/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
40/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A

Calvert Education Curriculum (2018)

Published By: Calvert Learning

| Date Published: 2019/04/15

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
32/42
20/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
20/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
20/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
20/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
20/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
20/32
Usability
N/A

Collaborative Literacy (2016)

Published By: Center for the Collaborative Classroom

| Date Published: 2019/05/15

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
33/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
29/36
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
33/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
29/36
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A

Collections (2015)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2016/08/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
30/36
16/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
25/36
16/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
30/36
18/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
16/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
25/36
Building Knowledge
16/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
18/32
Usability
N/A

Collections (2017)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2017/02/22

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
30/36
16/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
26/36
16/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
31/36
18/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
16/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
26/36
Building Knowledge
16/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
31/36
Building Knowledge
18/32
Usability
N/A

Common Core Code X (2014)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2019/04/22

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
30/36
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
30/36
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
30/36
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A

Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) (2015)

Published By: Amplify

| Date Published: 2017/04/08

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
37/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
37/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
37/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
32/34

Developing Core Literacy Proficiencies (2016)

Published By: Odell Education

| Date Published: 2017/08/31

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
32/36
28/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
32/36
28/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
32/36
28/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
31/34

EL Education Grades 6-8 Language Arts Curriculum (Second Edition) (2019)

Published By: EL Education

| Date Published: 2021/02/11

| EdReports Review Tool v1.5

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25

EL Education 6–8 Language Arts (2019)

Published By: Open Up Resources

| Date Published: 2021/02/11

| EdReports Review Tool v1.5

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25

EL Education K-5 Language Arts (2017)

Published By: Open Up Resources

| Date Published: 2018/03/06

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
39/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
39/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
39/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Engage NY (2016)

Published By: Engage NY

| Date Published: 2017/01/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Expeditionary Learning (2016)

Published By: EL Education

| Date Published: 2016/07/08

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Holt McDougal Literature (2012)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2017/08/31

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
24/36
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
24/36
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
24/36
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
24/36
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
24/36
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
24/36
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A

Into Literature (2020)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2019/11/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
36/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
36/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
36/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
31/34

Into Reading (2020)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2020/01/23

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
39/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
40/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
40/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
32/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
32/34

Journeys (2017)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2017/04/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
27/42
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
27/42
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
27/42
12/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
21/36
10/32
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
27/42
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
27/42
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
27/42
Building Knowledge
12/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
21/36
Building Knowledge
10/32
Usability
N/A

LearnZillion EL Education 6-8 Language Arts (2020)

Published By: LearnZillion

| Date Published: 2021/02/11

| EdReports Review Tool v1.5

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
35/36
30/32
Meets Expectations
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25
Text Quality and Complexity
35/36
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
23/25

LearnZillion EL Education K-5 Language Arts (2019)

Published By: LearnZillion

| Date Published: 2019/05/15

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
39/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
39/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
39/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

LearnZillion Guidebooks (2018)

Published By: LearnZillion

| Date Published: 2019/04/02

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34

Literacy by Design (2013)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2018/12/05

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A

Fishtank ELA 3-5 (2018) (2018)

Published By: Match Education

| Date Published: 2019/01/29

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
37/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
18/34
37/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
18/34
37/42
28/32
Meets Expectations
18/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
18/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
18/34
Text Quality
37/42
Building Knowledge
28/32
Usability
18/34

Mirrors & Windows: Connecting with Literature (2016)

Published By: EMC School Publishing

| Date Published: 2018/10/24

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
33/36
18/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
18/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
18/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
18/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
18/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
18/32
Usability
N/A

MyPerspectives (2017)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2017/05/19

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34

myView Literacy (2020)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2020/04/14

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
40/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
40/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
40/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
30/34
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
30/34
Text Quality
40/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
30/34

Paths to College and Career (2016)

Published By: John Wiley & Sons

| Date Published: 2017/01/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Reach for Reading (2017)

Published By: National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning

| Date Published: 2019/10/02

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
32/42
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
30/36
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
30/36
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A

Reading Street Common Core (2013)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2017/04/06

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
19/42
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
14/36
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
19/42
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
14/36
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A

Reading Wonders (2017)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2017/04/05

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
39/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
39/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
39/42
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A

ReadyGEN (2016)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2017/04/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
39/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
38/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
38/42
30/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
39/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
38/42
Building Knowledge
30/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Spider Learning ELA (2019)

Published By: Spider Learning, Inc.

| Date Published: 2020/06/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
13/36
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
13/36
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
13/36
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
13/36
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
13/36
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
13/36
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A

Springboard (2021)

Published By: College Board

| Date Published: 2020/08/27

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
35/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34
Text Quality
35/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
33/34

Springboard English Language Arts Common Core Edition (2014)

Published By: College Board

| Date Published: 2016/08/08

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
31/36
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
31/36
22/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
32/36
24/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
31/36
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
31/36
Building Knowledge
22/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
24/32
Usability
N/A

Springboard English Language Arts Common Core Edition (2018)

Published By: College Board

| Date Published: 2018/03/16

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
33/36
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
33/36
26/32
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A
Text Quality
33/36
Building Knowledge
26/32
Usability
N/A

StoryTown (2009 with 2012 CCSS Pack)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2018/04/12

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
17/36
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Text Quality
17/36
Building Knowledge
N/A
Usability
N/A

StudySync ELA (2021)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2020/09/03

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
32/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
32/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
32/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
32/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34

Wit & Wisdom (2016)

Published By: Great Minds

| Date Published: 2020/02/27

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
41/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
41/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
41/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
36/36
32/32
Meets Expectations
34/34
Text Quality
41/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
41/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
41/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34
Text Quality
36/36
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
34/34

Wonders (2020)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2019/11/21

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Text Quality and Complexity
Building Knowledge
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
42/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
42/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
42/42
32/32
Meets Expectations
31/34
Text Quality
42/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
42/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34
Text Quality
42/42
Building Knowledge
32/32
Usability
31/34

The EdReports rubric supports a sequential review process through three gateways. These gateways reflect the importance of alignment to college and career ready standards and considers other attributes of high-quality curriculum, such as usability and design, as recommended by educators.

Materials must meet or partially meet expectations for the first set of indicators (gateway 1) to move to the other gateways. 

Gateways 1 and 2 focus on questions of alignment to the standards. Are the instructional materials aligned to the standards? Are all standards present and treated with appropriate depth and quality required to support student learning?

Gateway 3 focuses on the question of usability. Are the instructional materials user-friendly for students and educators? Materials must be well designed to facilitate student learning and enhance a teacher’s ability to differentiate and build knowledge within the classroom. 

In order to be reviewed and attain a rating for usability (Gateway 3), the instructional materials must first meet expectations for alignment (Gateways 1 and 2).

EdReports.org’s tools evaluate instructional materials from the educator and student perspective. We know when materials enter a classroom, teachers are looking for two key features: are the materials aligned to college- and career- ready standards and are they usable for students and educators?

Alignment: The foundation of the review process is the evaluation of the instructional materials’ alignment to college- and career-ready standards. Reviewers examine not only the presence of standards, but how well the standards are sequenced and the depth with which standards are included. Aligned materials allow students to engage with texts, problems, and assessments that build logically from year to year so that they graduate college- and career-ready.

Our overall alignment rating combines the scores for the following categories:

  • In ELA: 

    • Text Quality and Complexity (gateway 1)

    • Building Knowledge Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks (gateway 2)

  • In Math: 

    • Focus and Coherence (gateway 1)

    • Rigor and Mathematical Practices (gateway 2)

  • In Science:

    • Designed for NGSS (gateway 1)

    • Coherence and Scope (gateway 2)

Usability: The review process also examines whether or not the instructional materials are usable for students and educators. Materials must be well designed to facilitate student learning and enhance a teacher’s ability to differentiate and build knowledge within the classroom. It also means that the materials offer assessments that help educators and parents focus on strengths and areas of growth, and incorporate technology effectively as a means to helping students learn.

If materials meet expectations for alignment, then the final rating assigned is the usability score (gateway 3).